Zaleplon and triazolam physical dependence assessed across increasing doses under a once-daily dosing regimen in baboons

Tolerance and dependence following chronic alprazolam treatment in rhesus monkeys: Role of GABAA receptor subtypes

BACKGROUND

To assess GABA_A receptor subtypes involved in benzodiazepine tolerance and dependence, we evaluated the ability of subtype-selective and non-selective ligands to substitute for (i.e., produce "cross-tolerance") or precipitate withdrawal during chronic alprazolam treatment.

METHODS

Four female rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) were implanted with chronic intravenous catheters and administered alprazolam (1.0 mg/kg every 4 h). Following 14+ days of chronic alprazolam, acute administration of selected doses of non-selective and subtype-selective ligands were substituted for, or administered with, alprazolam, followed by quantitative behavioral observations. The ligands included alprazolam and midazolam (positive modulators, non-selective), zolpidem (positive modulator, preferential affinity for α1-containing GABA_A receptors), HZ-166 (positive modulator, preferential efficacy at α2- and α3-containing GABA_A receptors), and βCCT (antagonist, preferential affinity for α1-containing GABA_A receptors).

RESULTS

Acutely, alprazolam and midazolam both induced observable ataxia along with a mild form of sedation referred to as "rest/sleep posture" at a lower dose (0.1 mg/kg, i.v.), whereas at a higher dose (1.0 mg/kg, i.v.), induced deep sedation and observable ataxia. With chronic alprazolam treatment, observable ataxia and deep sedation were reduced significantly, whereas rest/sleep posture was unchanged or emerged. Zolpidem showed a similar pattern of effects, whereas no behaviors engendered by HZ-166 were changed by chronic alprazolam. Administration of βCCT, but not HZ-166, resulted in significant withdrawal signs.

CONCLUSIONS

These results are consistent with a role for α1-containing GABA_A receptor subtypes in tolerance and dependence observed with chronic alprazolam, although other receptors may be involved in the withdrawal syndrome.

Nonclinical pharmacology of daridorexant: a new dual orexin receptor antagonist for the treatment of insomnia

Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) represent a novel type of sleep medication that provide an alternative to the traditionally used positive allosteric gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-A receptor modulators. Daridorexant is a new DORA that exhibited in phase 3 trials in insomnia not only a beneficial effect on sleep variables, measured objectively and assessed subjectively, but also an improvement in daytime functioning. Daridorexant was discovered through a tailored research program aimed at identifying an optimized sleep-promoting molecule with pharmacokinetic properties appropriate for covering the whole night while avoiding next-morning residual activity at efficacious doses. By specific binding to both orexin receptors, daridorexant inhibits the actions of the wake-promoting orexin (also called hypocretin) neuropeptides. This mechanism avoids a more widespread inhibition of neuronal pathways and associated side effects that are intrinsic to positive allosteric GABA-A receptor modulators. Here, we review the general pharmacology of daridorexant, based on nonclinical pharmacology studies of daridorexant, unpublished or already described, or based on work with other DORAs. Some unique features of daridorexant will be highlighted, such as the promotion of natural and surmountable sleep, the preservation of memory and cognition, the absence of tolerance development or risk of physical dependence, and how it can benefit daytime functioning.

Tolerance to the rate-increasing and not rate-decreasing effects of pregnanolone in rats

Chronic treatment with benzodiazepines, which positively modulate γ-aminobutyric acidA (GABAA) receptors, can lead to the development of tolerance. Similar effects might also occur during chronic treatment with positive modulators acting at other sites on GABAA receptors (e.g. neuroactive steroids). In this study, tolerance and cross tolerance were examined in seven rats treated daily with the neuroactive steroid pregnanolone (25.6 mg/kg/day) and responding under a fixed ratio 10 schedule of food presentation. Dose-effect curves were determined for positive GABAA modulators (pregnanolone, flunitrazepam, midazolam, and pentobarbital), and other drugs (ketamine and morphine) before, during, and after chronic treatment. Initially, daily pregnanolone administration increased responding; although tolerance developed to the rate-increasing effects after 14 weeks, tolerance did not develop to the rate-decreasing effects. The potencies of pregnanolone, midazolam, and morphine to decrease responding did not change during treatment, whereas flunitrazepam was more potent and pentobarbital and ketamine were less potent during treatment as compared to before treatment. Pregnanolone and midazolam were more potent after treatment than before treatment. The development of tolerance to the rate-increasing effects of pregnanolone indicates that neuroadaptations occur during chronic treatment; the fact that tolerance develops to only some effects suggests that the behavioral consequences of these neuroadaptations are limited.

The behavioral pharmacology of zolpidem: evidence for the functional significance of α1-containing GABA(A) receptors

RATIONALE

Zolpidem is a positive allosteric modulator of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) with preferential binding affinity and efficacy for α1-subunit containing GABA(A) receptors (α1-GABA(A)Rs). Over the last three decades, a variety of animal models and experimental procedures have been used in an attempt to relate the behavioral profile of zolpidem and classic benzodiazepines (BZs) to their interaction with α1-GABA(A)Rs.

OBJECTIVES

This paper reviews the results of rodent and non-human primate studies that have evaluated the effects of zolpidem on motor behaviors, anxiety, memory, food and fluid intake, and electroencephalogram (EEG) sleep patterns. Also included are studies that examined zolpidem's discriminative, reinforcing, and anticonvulsant effects as well as behavioral signs of tolerance and withdrawal.

RESULTS

The literature reviewed indicates that α1-GABA(A)Rs play a principle role in mediating the hypothermic, ataxic-like, locomotor- and memory-impairing effects of zolpidem and BZs. Evidence also suggests that α1-GABA(A)Rs play partial roles in the hypnotic, EEG sleep, anticonvulsant effects, and anxiolytic-like of zolpidem and diazepam. These studies also indicate that α1-GABA(A)Rs play a more prominent role in mediating the discriminative stimulus, reinforcing, hyperphagic, and withdrawal effects of zolpidem and BZs in primates than in rodents.

CONCLUSIONS

The psychopharmacological data from both rodents and non-human primates suggest that zolpidem has a unique pharmacological profile when compared with classic BZs. The literature reviewed here provides an important framework for studying the role of different GABA(A)R subtypes in the behavioral effects of BZ-type drugs and helps guide the development of new pharmaceutical agents for disorders currently treated with BZ-type drugs.

Intravenous self-administration of γ-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) in baboons

BACKGROUND

Abuse of gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) poses a public health concern. In previous studies, intravenous (IV) self-administration of GHB doses up to 10 mg/kg was not maintained in non-human primates under limited-access conditions, which was inconsistent with the usual good correspondence between drugs abused by humans and those self-injected by laboratory animals.

METHODS

Self-administration of GHB was studied in 10 baboons using procedures standard for our laboratory to assess drug abuse liability. Each self-injection depended on completion of 120 or 160 lever responses. Sessions ran continuously; a 3-h timeout limited the number of injections per 24h to 8. Self-injection was established at 6-8 injections/day with cocaine (0.32 mg/kg/injection) prior to substitution of each GHB dose (3.2-178 mg/kg/injection) or vehicle for 15 days. Food pellets were available 24h/day.

RESULTS

GHB maintained significantly greater numbers of injections when compared to vehicle in 6 of the 9 baboons that completed GHB evaluations that included 32 mg/kg/injection or higher. The baboons that self-administered GHB at high rates were ones for which GHB was the first drug each had tested under the 24-h/day cocaine baseline procedure. Self-injection of the highest doses of GHB decreased food-maintained responding.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose GHB can function as a reinforcer in non-human primates under 24-h access, but self-administration history may be important. The findings are consistent with the demonstrated abuse liability of GHB in humans, and remove GHB as an exception to the typical good correspondence between those drugs abused by humans and those self-administered by nonhuman primates.

Principles of laboratory assessment of drug abuse liability and implications for clinical development

Abuse liability testing plays an important role in informing drug development, regulatory processes, and clinical practice. This paper describes the current "gold standard" methodologies that are used for laboratory assessments of abuse liability in non-human and human subjects. Particular emphasis is given to procedures such as non-human drug discrimination, self-administration, and physical dependence testing, and human dose-effect abuse liability studies that are commonly used in regulatory submissions to governmental agencies. The potential benefits and risks associated with the inclusion of measures of abuse liability in industry-sponsored clinical trials is discussed. Lastly, it is noted that many factors contribute to patterns of drug abuse and dependence outside of the laboratory setting and positive or negative signals in abuse liability studies do not always translate to high or low levels of actual abuse or dependence. Well-designed patient and physician education, pharmacovigilance, and postmarketing surveillance can reduce the diversion and misuse of drugs with abuse liability and can effectively foster the protection and promotion of public health.

Reducing abuse liability of GABAA/benzodiazepine ligands via selective partial agonist efficacy at alpha1 and alpha2/3 subtypes

Abuse-liability-related effects of subtype-selective GABA(A) modulators were explored relative to the prototypic benzodiazepine lorazepam. 7-Cyclobutyl-6-(2-methyl-2H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ylmethoxy)-3-phenyl-1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-b]pyridazine (TPA123) has weak partial agonist efficacy at alpha(1)-, alpha(2)-, alpha(3)-, and alpha(5)-containing GABA(A) receptors, whereas 7-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-6-(2-ethyl-2H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ylmethoxy)-3-(2-fluorophenyl)-1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-b]pyridazine (TPA023) has weaker partial agonist efficacy at alpha(2) and alpha(3) and none at alpha(1) and alpha(5) subtypes. For both compounds, preclinical data suggested efficacy as nonsedating anxiolytics. Self-injection of TPA123 (0.0032-0.1 mg/kg) and TPA023 (0.0032-0.32 mg/kg) was compared with lorazepam (0.01-0.32 mg/kg) in baboons. TPA123 and lorazepam maintained self-injection higher than vehicle at two or more doses in each baboon; peak rate of self-injection of lorazepam was higher than TPA123. Self-injected lorazepam and TPA123 also increased rates of concurrently occurring food-maintained behavior. After the availability of self-administered TPA123 doses ended, an effect consistent with a mild benzodiazepine-like withdrawal syndrome occurred. In contrast with lorazepam and TPA123, TPA023 did not maintain self-administration. Positron emission tomography studies showed that TPA023 produced a dose-dependent inhibition in the binding of [(11)C]flumazenil to the benzodiazepine binding site in the baboon, which was essentially complete (i.e., 100% occupancy) at the highest TPA023 dose (0.32 mg/kg). In a physical dependence study, TPA023 (32 mg/kg/24 h) was delivered as a continuous intragastric drip. Neither flumazenil at 14 days nor stopping TPA023 after 30 to 31 days resulted in the marked withdrawal syndrome characteristic of benzodiazepines in baboons. In the context of other data, elimination of efficacy at the alpha(1) subtype of the GABA/benzodiazepine receptor is not sufficient to eliminate abuse liability but may do so when coupled with reduced alpha(2/3) subtype efficacy.

Selective changes in sensitivity to benzodiazepines, and not other positive GABA(A) modulators, in rats receiving flunitrazepam chronically

RATIONALE

Tolerance and dependence can develop during chronic benzodiazepine treatment; however, cross tolerance and cross dependence to positive modulators acting at other sites on GABA(A) receptors might not occur.

OBJECTIVES

The current study evaluated changes in sensitivity to positive GABA(A) modulators during chronic treatment with the benzodiazepine flunitrazepam to determine whether cross tolerance and cross dependence varied as a function of site of action.

METHODS

Eight rats responded under a fixed ratio 20 schedule of food presentation. Dose-effect curves were determined before, during and after chronic treatment with one or two daily injections of 1 mg/kg of flunitrazepam.

RESULTS

Prior to chronic treatment, benzodiazepines (flunitrazepam, midazolam), a barbiturate (pentobarbital), a neuroactive steroid (pregnanolone), and drugs with primary mechanisms of action at receptors other than GABA(A) receptors (morphine, ketamine) dose-dependently decreased responding. Twice daily treatment with flunitrazepam produced 9.5- and 23-fold shifts to the right in the flunitrazepam and midazolam dose-effect curves, respectively. In contrast, dose-effect curves for other drugs either were not changed or were shifted less than or equal to fourfold to the right.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased sensitivity to benzodiazepines and not to a barbiturate or a neuroactive steroid during chronic flunitrazepam treatment indicates that tolerance and cross tolerance developed only to benzodiazepines. Despite similar acute behavioral effects among positive GABA(A) modulators, the differential development of cross tolerance suggests that adaptations at GABA(A) receptors produced by chronic benzodiazepine treatment differentially affect positive modulators depending on their site of action; such differences might be exploited to benefit patients treated daily with positive GABA(A) modulators.

Behavioral effects and pharmacokinetics of gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) precursors gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) and 1,4-butanediol (1,4-BD) in baboons

RATIONALE

Gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) and 1,4-butanediol (1,4-BD) are prodrugs for gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB). Like GHB, GBL and 1,4-BD are drugs of abuse, but their behavioral effects may differ from GHB under some conditions.

OBJECTIVES

The first study compared the behavioral effects of GBL (32-240 mg/kg) and 1,4-BD (32-240 mg/kg) with each other and to effects previously reported for GHB (32-420 mg/kg). A second study determined GHB pharmacokinetics following intragastric administration of GHB, GBL, and 1,4-BD.

METHODS

Operant responding for food, observed behavioral effects, and a fine-motor task occurred at multiple time intervals after administration of drug or vehicle. In a separate pharmacokinetics study, blood samples were collected across multiple time points after administration of GHB, GBL, and 1,4-BD.

RESULTS

Like GHB, GBL, and 1,4-BD impaired performance on the fine-motor task, but the onset of motor impairment differed across drugs. GBL and 1,4-BD dose dependently decreased the number of food pellets earned, but at lower doses than previously observed for GHB. Similar to GHB, both GBL and 1,4-BD produced sedation, muscle relaxation, gastrointestinal symptoms, and tremors/jerks. Administration of GBL and 1,4-BD produced higher maximum concentrations of GHB with shorter times to maximum concentrations of GHB in plasma when compared to GHB administration.

CONCLUSIONS

GBL and 1,4-BD produced behavioral effects similar to those previously reported with GHB and the time course of effects were related to blood levels of GHB. Given their higher potency and faster onset of effects, the abuse liability of GBL and 1,4-BD may be greater than GHB.

Contribution of alpha1 subunit-containing gamma-aminobutyric acidA (GABAA) receptors to motor-impairing effects of benzodiazepines in squirrel monkeys

RATIONALE

Benzodiazepines (BZs) are effective anxiolytics and hypnotics, but their use is limited by unwanted side effects, such as motor impairment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the contribution of alpha1 subunit-containing gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) (GABA(A)) receptor subtypes to the motor-impairing effects of BZs, the present study evaluated two observable measures of motor coordination (balance on a pole, resistance to hind-limb flexion) engendered by nonselective and selective BZ-site agonists in squirrel monkeys.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multiple doses of nonselective BZs (triazolam, alprazolam, diazepam, and chlordiazepoxide) and alpha1 subunit-preferring agonists (zolpidem and zaleplon) were administered to adult male squirrel monkeys (N = 4-6), and experimenters rated the monkey's ability to balance on a horizontal pole ("ataxic-like effects"), as well as the degree of resistance to hind-limb flexion ("myorelaxant-like effects").

RESULTS

Administration of all BZ-type drugs resulted in ataxic-like and myorelaxant-like effects. Pretreatment with the alpha1 subunit-preferring antagonist beta-carboline-3-carboxylate-t-butyl ester (betaCCT) attenuated the ataxic-like effects engendered by both types of drugs. However, betaCCT was largely ineffective at blocking the ability of both BZs and non-BZs to induce myorelaxant-like effects.

CONCLUSIONS

These experiments demonstrate dose-dependent motor impairment in squirrel monkeys using quantitative behavioral observation techniques. Altogether, these findings suggest a lack of a prominent role for alpha1 subunit-containing receptors in the alteration of hind-limb flexion, a putative measure of myorelaxation, induced by BZ-type drugs in monkeys.

Novel discriminative stimulus effects of TPA023B, subtype-selective gamma-aminobutyric-acid(A)/benzodiazepine modulator: comparisons with zolpidem, lorazepam, and TPA023

Anxiolytics with fewer unwanted effects may be created by varying GABAergic efficacy at the BZ binding site across GABA(A) receptor subtypes. TPA023 and TPA023B have in vitro antagonist efficacy at alpha(1) subtypes and partial-agonist efficacy at alpha(2/3) subtypes. TPA023B has partial-agonist efficacy at alpha(5); TPA023 has none. Drug discrimination procedures were used to determine whether the novel GABA(A) receptor efficacy profiles would be reflected in a model of subjective effects of BZ-site ligands. Rats were trained to discriminate TPA023, TPA023B, the nonselective BZ anxiolytic lorazepam, or the alpha(1)-selective hypnotic zolpidem. The lorazepam, zolpidem, and TPA023 discriminations were learned in < 50 sessions. The TPA023B training group showed no evidence of acquiring the TPA023B discrimination after 160 sessions despite various procedural manipulations. Neither zolpidem- nor lorazepam-trained rats generalized to TPA023B. Within the same dose range, however, TPA023-trained rats generalized fully and dose-dependently to TPA023B. Number of training sessions to regain criterion discrimination performance following TPA023B tests in the lorazepam, zolpidem, and TPA023 groups increased as a function of dose, likely due to effects of residual TPA023B. Together with previous data, the present results suggest that elimination of alpha(1) efficacy plus reductions in alpha(2/3) efficacy permits anxiolysis but decreases BZ-like interoceptive stimulus effects.

Abuse and dependence liability of benzodiazepine-type drugs: GABA(A) receptor modulation and beyond

Over the past several decades, benzodiazepines and the newer non-benzodiazepines have become the anxiolytic/hypnotics of choice over the more readily abused barbiturates. While all drugs from this class act at the GABA(A) receptor, benzodiazepine-type drugs offer the clear advantage of being safer and better tolerated. However, there is still potential for these drugs to be abused, and significant evidence exists to suggest that this is a growing problem. This review examines the behavioral determinants of the abuse and dependence liability of benzodiazepine-type drugs. Moreover, the pharmacological and putative biochemical basis of the abuse-related behavior is discussed.

Chronic intragastric administration of gamma-butyrolactone produces physical dependence in baboons

RATIONALE

Abuse of gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and its precursors is a public health concern. Gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) is found in commercially available products and, when ingested, is metabolized to GHB.

OBJECTIVE

The goal was to evaluate the physical dependence potential and behavioral effects of GBL.

METHODS

Vehicle and then GBL were administered continuously (24 h per da y) in baboons (Papio anubis, n=5) via intragastric catheters. GBL dosing was initiated at 100 mg/kg/day and then progressively increased stepwise by increments of 100 mg/kg to a final dose of 600 mg/kg. The number of food pellets earned, fine-motor task performance, and observed behaviors were used as dependent measures. Precipitated withdrawal was evaluated after administration of GABA-B and benzodiazepine receptor antagonists during chronic GBL dosing (400-600 mg/kg). Spontaneous withdrawal was evaluated after discontinuation of chronic GBL 600 mg/kg. Blood GHB levels were determined during chronic dosing of each GBL dose by isotope dilution assay.

RESULTS

Chronic GBL dose-dependently decreased food-maintained behavior, disrupted performance on the fine-motor task, and produced signs of sedation and muscle relaxation. The GABA-B antagonist SGS742 [56 mg/kg, intramuscular (IM)] precipitated a withdrawal syndrome, whereas the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil (5 mg/kg, IM) produced little or no effect. Signs of physical dependence were also demonstrated when chronic GBL dosing was discontinued. Analysis of plasma indicated GBL was metabolized to GHB; levels were 825 to 1,690 micromol l(-1) GHB and 2,430 to 3,785 micromol l(-1) GHB after week 1 of 400 and 600 mg/kg/day, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that, like GHB, chronic GBL dosing produced physical dependence that likely involved the GABA-B receptor.

Enhanced sucrose pellet consumption induced by benzodiazepine-type drugs in squirrel monkeys: role of GABAA receptor subtypes

RATIONALE

Benzodiazepine agonists characteristically increase food intake in humans and non-human subjects, and the underlying mechanisms of this effect are not understood completely.

OBJECTIVE

Compounds with selectivity for GABAA receptor subtypes were used to evaluate the role of GABAA receptors containing alpha1 and alpha5 subunits (alpha1GABAA and alpha5GABAA receptors, respectively) in benzodiazepine-induced increases in sucrose pellet consumption.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult male squirrel monkeys (N=4-6), maintained under free-feeding conditions, were administered with intramuscular injections of the nonselective benzodiazepines diazepam and alprazolam, the alpha1GABAA-preferring compounds zolpidem and zaleplon, or the alpha5GABAA-preferring agonist QH-ii-066 before daily 10-min periods when sucrose pellets were available. In a separate experiment, observable behavioral effects (e.g., ataxia and procumbent posture) were quantified after administration of alprazolam, zaleplon, and QH-ii-066. To further assess the roles of GABAA receptor subtypes, zolpidem-induced increases in pellet consumption were re-evaluated after pretreatment with nonselective antagonist flumazenil, the alpha1GABAA-preferring antagonist beta-carboline-3-carboxylate-t-butyl ester (BCCT), or QH-ii-066.

RESULTS

Alprazolam, diazepam, zolpidem, and zaleplon but not QH-ii-066 significantly increased sucrose pellet consumption. In addition, all agonists decreased locomotion and environment-directed behavior as well as engendered ataxia and procumbent posture. For all compounds except QH-ii-066, these behaviors occurred at doses similar to those that increased pellet consumption. Flumazenil and BCCT, but not QH-ii-066, antagonized zolpidem-induced increases in pellet consumption in a surmountable fashion.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the alpha1GABAA receptor subtype plays a key role in benzodiazepine-induced increases in consumption of palatable food, whereas the alpha5GABAA receptor subtype may not be involved in this effect.

Comparison of the behavioral effects of bretazenil and flumazenil in triazolam-dependent and non-dependent baboons

Behavioral effects of the benzodiazepine receptor partial agonist bretazenil were compared with those of the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist flumazenil under conditions in which three baboons received continuous intragastric (i.g.) infusion of vehicle and then continuous i.g. infusion of triazolam (1.0 mg/kg/day). In each condition, acute doses of flumazenil (0.01-3.2 mg/kg) and bretazenil (0.01-10.0 mg/kg) were administered every 2 weeks (beginning after 30 days of treatment in the triazolam-dependent condition). Food pellets were available during daily 20-h sessions. Following test injections, 60-min behavioral observations were conducted followed by a fine motor assessment. During chronic vehicle administration, neither drug produced changes in observed behaviors. Bretazenil increased pellets earned and time to complete the fine-motor task (10.0 mg/kg dose). During chronic triazolam dosing, both bretazenil and flumazenil precipitated benzodiazepine withdrawal syndromes, characterized by vomiting, tremors/jerks, and a decrease in pellets earned. Thus, bretazenil can function as an antagonist under conditions of benzodiazepine physical dependence.

Self-injection of flunitrazepam alone and in the context of methadone maintenance in baboons

Patients in methadone maintenance programs use benzodiazepines to "boost" methadone's subjective effects, and flunitrazepam has been prominent in this context. Self-administration of flunitrazepam (0.001-0.32 mg/kg i.v.) alone and during daily oral methadone administration was evaluated in three baboons. Flunitrazepam maintained self-injection as an inverted U-shaped function of dose at rates higher than those maintained by most other benzodiazepines under the same procedure. In the context of demonstrated physical dependence on 3.2 mg/kg/day p.o. methadone, flunitrazepam doses on the ascending limb of the dose-effect curve maintained greater rates of self-injection than before methadone in two baboons. When the methadone dose decreased to 1.8 mg/kg/day, self-injection remained higher for those baboons and became higher than before methadone for the third baboon. Self-injection remained higher when methadone decreased to 1.0 mg/kg/day, except self-injection of the lowest flunitrazepam dose returned to or below the pre-methadone rate for two baboons. After methadone was discontinued, the dose-effect curve shifted to the right in one baboon but remained to the left in two. Flunitrazepam thus served as a reinforcer alone and in the context of methadone maintenance. Lower doses maintained higher self-injection during and shortly after methadone maintenance. Further research should explore the duration of higher self-injection rates following methadone maintenance.

Contributions of GABAA receptor subtype selectivity to abuse liability and dependence potential of pharmacological treatments for anxiety and sleep disorders

When benzodiazepines (BZs) supplanted barbiturates as a favored, safer treatment for anxiety and sleep disorders in the 1960s, the abuse liability and dependence potential of these drugs were little understood. Widespread recognition of the difficulty of stopping use of chronically taken BZs emerged through the popular press in the late 1970s, which resulted in reluctance to prescribe these otherwise clinically useful compounds. Evolution of the understanding of the biochemical basis for BZ effects in the 1980s and 1990s, coupled with regulatory emphasis on collection of data used in legal scheduling decisions, made possible a targeted search for drugs that would provide effective treatment for anxiety disorders in the absence of abuse liability or dependence potential. Compounds that have selective efficacy at subtypes of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor, are active in preclinical anxiolytic screens, but negative in preclinical studies of behavior relevant to evaluation of abuse liability appear to be one promising means for achieving this end.

Principles of drug abuse liability assessment in laboratory animals

This paper describes the rationale for use of preclinical assessments of abuse liability in laboratory animals, and then discusses "cross-cutting" methodological issues that apply to behavioral evaluations intended to contribute to an abuse liability evaluation package. Issues include use of: (1) positive and negative control conditions; (2) full dose-effect evaluations, (3) multiple dependent measures, (4) pharmacokinetic evaluations to guide choice of dose ranges, (5) a species for which good methodological and comparative data are available to aid interpretation of results, and (6) appropriate methods for the group or single-subject experimental design selected. The remainder of the paper describes basic methodology by which three core pieces of behavioral data required by the Food and Drug Administration for its use in the overall abuse liability analysis can be obtained preclinically. Reinforcing effects are assessed in study of drug self-administration; drug discrimination assesses degree of overlap of interoceptive stimulus effects with relevant comparison drugs; physical dependence potential is determined by assessing whether a withdrawal syndrome occurs after chronic drug administration. Background and methodological issues specific to each procedure are discussed. A key consideration for cross-cutting and specific methodological issues is that choices made enable confident interpretation of both positive and negative results.

Comparison of the effects of zaleplon, zolpidem, and triazolam at various GABA(A) receptor subtypes

The pyrazolopyrimidine zaleplon is a hypnotic agent that acts at the benzodiazepine recognition site of GABA(A) receptors. Zaleplon, like the hypnotic agent zolpidem but unlike classical benzodiazepines, exhibits preferential affinity for type I benzodiazepine (BZ(1)/omega(1)) receptors in binding assays. The modulatory action of zaleplon at GABA(A) receptors has now been compared with those of zolpidem and the triazolobenzodiazepine triazolam. Zaleplon potentiated GABA-evoked Cl(-) currents in Xenopus oocytes expressing human GABA(A) receptor subunits with a potency that was higher at alpha1beta2gamma2 receptors than at alpha2- or alpha3-containing receptors. Zolpidem, but not triazolam, also exhibited selectivity for alpha1-containing receptors. However, the potency of zaleplon at these various receptors was one-third to one-half that of zolpidem. Zaleplon and zolpidem also differed in their actions at receptors containing the alpha5 or gamma3 subunit. Zaleplon, zolpidem, and triazolam exhibited similar patterns of efficacy among the different receptor subtypes. The affinities of zaleplon for [(3)H]flunitrazepam or t-[(35)S]butylbicyclophosphorothionate ([(35)S]TBPS) binding sites in rat brain membranes were lower than those of zolpidem or triazolam. Furthermore, zaleplon, unlike zolpidem, exhibited virtually no affinity for the peripheral type of benzodiazepine receptor.

Changes in GABA(A) receptor gene expression induced by withdrawal of, but not by long-term exposure to, zaleplon or zolpidem

The effects of long-term treatment with and subsequent withdrawal of the two hypnotic drugs zaleplon and zolpidem on the abundance of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptor subunit mRNAs in cultured rat cerebellar granule cells were investigated. Incubation of neurons with either drug at a concentration of 10 microM for 5 days did not significantly affect the amounts of mRNAs encoding the alpha(1), alpha(4), beta(1), beta(2), beta(3), gamma(2)L, or gamma(2)S subunits. As expected, similar treatment with the nonselective benzodiazepine diazepam resulted in a decrease in the abundance of alpha(1), beta(2), gamma(2)L, and gamma(2)S subunit mRNAs as well as an increase in that of the beta(1) subunit mRNA. Withdrawal of zaleplon or zolpidem, like that of diazepam, induced a marked increase in the amount of the alpha(4) subunit mRNA. In addition, discontinuation of treatment with either hypnotic drug resulted in a decrease in the amounts of alpha(1), beta(2), gamma(2)L, and gamma(2)S subunit mRNAs as well as an increase in that of the beta(1) subunit mRNA. These effects of zaleplon and zolpidem on GABA(A) receptor gene expression are consistent with the reduced tolerance liability of these drugs, compared with that of diazepam, as well as with their ability to induce both physical dependence and withdrawal syndrome.

Zaleplon and triazolam: drug discrimination, plasma levels, and self-administration in baboons

Zaleplon is a chemically novel hypnotic that preferentially binds alpha(1)-subunit containing subtypes of the alphabetagamma configuration of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)(A) receptor. Zaleplon and the non-subtype-selective hypnotic triazolam occasioned 100% drug-appropriate responding in baboons trained to discriminate lorazepam or pentobarbital from vehicle. Flumazenil shifted the zaleplon generalization gradient at least five-fold to the right. A plasma elimination half-life of 6-8 h for oral 10 mg/kg zaleplon and 0.32 mg/kg triazolam was paralleled by discriminative control for 7 h. Zaleplon maintained self-injection greater than vehicle, as did comparison doses of the similarly selective hypnotic zolpidem and triazolam. Concurrent food-maintained responding increased during self-injection of all three drugs. Preferential binding at this alpha(1)-containing GABA(A) subtype did not diminish the benzodiazepine (Bzs)-like behavioral effects of zaleplon.