A human 28S ribosomal RNA retropseudogene

Comparative Genomics Reveals LINE-1 Recombination with Diverse RNAs

Long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1, L1) retrotransposons are the most abundant protein-coding transposable elements (TE) in mammalian genomes, and have shaped genome content over 170 million years of evolution. LINE-1 is self-propagating and mobilizes other sequences, including Alu elements. Occasionally, LINE-1 forms chimeric insertions with non-coding RNAs and mRNAs. U6 spliceosomal small nuclear RNA/LINE-1 chimeras are best known, though there are no comprehensive catalogs of LINE-1 chimeras. To address this, we developed TiMEstamp, a computational pipeline that leverages multiple sequence alignments (MSA) to estimate the age of LINE-1 insertions and identify candidate chimeric insertions where an adjacent sequence arrives contemporaneously. Candidates were refined by detecting hallmark features of L1 retrotransposition, such as target site duplication (TSD). Applying this pipeline to the human genome, we recovered all known species of LINE-1 chimeras and discovered new chimeric insertions involving small RNAs, Alu elements, and mRNA fragments. Some insertions are compatible with known mechanisms, such as RNA ligation. Other structures nominate novel mechanisms, such as trans-splicing. We also see evidence that LINE-1 loci with defunct promoters can acquire regulatory elements from nearby genes to restore retrotransposition activity. These discoveries highlight the recombinatory potential of LINE-1 RNA with implications for genome evolution and TE domestication.

The Ribosome as a Missing Link in Prebiotic Evolution III: Over-Representation of tRNA- and rRNA-Like Sequences and Plieofunctionality of Ribosome-Related Molecules Argues for the Evolution of Primitive Genomes from Ribosomal RNA Modules

We propose that ribosomal RNA (rRNA) formed the basis of the first cellular genomes, and provide evidence from a review of relevant literature and proteonomic tests. We have proposed previously that the ribosome may represent the vestige of the first self-replicating entity in which rRNAs also functioned as genes that were transcribed into functional messenger RNAs (mRNAs) encoding ribosomal proteins. rRNAs also encoded polymerases to replicate itself and a full complement of the transfer RNAs (tRNAs) required to translate its genes. We explore here a further prediction of our “ribosome-first” theory: the ribosomal genome provided the basis for the first cellular genomes. Modern genomes should therefore contain an unexpectedly large percentage of tRNA- and rRNA-like modules derived from both sense and antisense reading frames, and these should encode non-ribosomal proteins, as well as ribosomal ones with key cell functions. Ribosomal proteins should also have been co-opted by cellular evolution to play extra-ribosomal functions. We review existing literature supporting these predictions. We provide additional, new data demonstrating that rRNA-like sequences occur at significantly higher frequencies than predicted on the basis of mRNA duplications or randomized RNA sequences. These data support our “ribosome-first” theory of cellular evolution.

Identification of a recently active mammalian SINE derived from ribosomal RNA

Complex eukaryotic genomes are riddled with repeated sequences whose derivation does not coincide with phylogenetic history and thus is often unknown. Among such sequences, the capacity for transcriptional activity coupled with the adaptive use of reverse transcription can lead to a diverse group of genomic elements across taxa, otherwise known as selfish elements or mobile elements. Short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs) are nonautonomous mobile elements found in eukaryotic genomes, typically derived from cellular RNAs such as tRNAs, 7SL or 5S rRNA. Here, we identify and characterize a previously unknown SINE derived from the 3'-end of the large ribosomal subunit (LSU or 28S rDNA) and transcribed via RNA polymerase III. This new element, SINE28, is represented in low-copy numbers in the human reference genome assembly, wherein we have identified 27 discrete loci. Phylogenetic analysis indicates these elements have been transpositionally active within primate lineages as recently as 6 MYA while modern humans still carry transcriptionally active copies. Moreover, we have identified SINE28s in all currently available assembled mammalian genome sequences. Phylogenetic comparisons indicate that these elements are frequently rederived from the highly conserved LSU rRNA sequences in a lineage-specific manner. We propose that this element has not been previously recognized as a SINE given its high identity to the canonical LSU, and that SINE28 likely represents one of possibly many unidentified, active transposable elements within mammalian genomes.

Sequence evidence in the archaeal genomes that tRNAs emerged through the combination of ancestral genes as 5' and 3' tRNA halves

The discovery of separate 5′ and 3′ halves of transfer RNA (tRNA) molecules—so-called split tRNA—in the archaeal parasite Nanoarchaeum equitans made us wonder whether ancestral tRNA was encoded on 1 or 2 genes. We performed a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of tRNAs in 45 archaeal species to explore the relationship between the three types of tRNAs (nonintronic, intronic and split). We classified 1953 mature tRNA sequences into 22 clusters. All split tRNAs have shown phylogenetic relationships with other tRNAs possessing the same anticodon. We also mimicked split tRNA by artificially separating the tRNA sequences of 7 primitive archaeal species at the anticodon and analyzed the sequence similarity and diversity of the 5′ and 3′ tRNA halves. Network analysis revealed specific characteristics of and topological differences between the 5′ and 3′ tRNA halves: the 5′ half sequences were categorized into 6 distinct groups with a sequence similarity of >80%, while the 3′ half sequences were categorized into 9 groups with a higher sequence similarity of >88%, suggesting different evolutionary backgrounds of the 2 halves. Furthermore, the combinations of 5′ and 3′ halves corresponded with the variation of amino acids in the codon table. We found not only universally conserved combinations of 5′–3′ tRNA halves in tRNA^iMet, tRNA^Thr, tRNA^Ile, tRNA^Gly, tRNA^Gln, tRNA^Glu, tRNA^Asp, tRNA^Lys, tRNA^Arg and tRNA^Leu but also phylum-specific combinations in tRNA^Pro, tRNA^Ala, and tRNA^Trp. Our results support the idea that tRNA emerged through the combination of separate genes and explain the sequence diversity that arose during archaeal tRNA evolution.

Ribin, a protein encoded by a message complementary to rRNA, modulates ribosomal transcription and cell proliferation

The control of rRNA transcription, tightly coupled to the cell cycle and growth state of the cell, is a key process for understanding the mechanisms that drive cell proliferation. Here we describe a novel protein, ribin, found in rodents, that binds to the rRNA promoter and stimulates its activity. The protein also interacts with the basal rRNA transcription factor UBF. The open reading frame encoding ribin is 96% complementary to a central region of the large rRNA. This demonstrates that ribosomal DNA-related sequences in higher eukaryotes can be expressed as protein-coding messages. Ribin contains two predicted nuclear localization sequence elements, and green fluorescent protein-ribin fusion proteins localize in the nucleus. Cell lines overexpressing ribin exhibit enhanced rRNA transcription and faster growth. Furthermore, these cells significantly overcome the suppression of rRNA synthesis caused by serum deprivation. On the other hand, the endogenous ribin level correlates positively with the amount of serum in the medium. The data show that ribin is a limiting stimulatory factor for rRNA synthesis in vivo and suggest its involvement in the pathway that adapts ribosomal transcription and cell proliferation to physiological changes.

RNAs from all categories generate retrosequences that may be exapted as novel genes or regulatory elements

While the significance of middle repetitive elements had been neglected for a long time, there are again tendencies to ascribe most members of a given middle repetitive sequence family a functional role--as if the discussion of SINE (short interspersed repetitive elements) function only can occupy extreme positions. In this article, I argue that differences between the various classes of retrosequences concern mainly their copy numbers. Consequently, the function of SINEs should be viewed as pragmatic such as, for example, mRNA-derived retrosequences, without underestimating the impact of retroposition for generation of novel protein coding genes or parts thereof (exon shuffling by retroposition) and in particular of SINEs (and retroelements) in modulating genes and their expression. Rapid genomic change by accumulating retrosequences may even facilitate speciation [McDonald, J.F., 1995. Transposable elements: possible catalysts of organismic evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 123-126.] In addition to providing mobile regulatory elements, small RNA-derived retrosequences including SINEs can, in analogy to mRNA-derived retrosequences, also give rise to novel small RNA genes. Perhaps not representative for all SINE/master gene relationships, we gained significant knowledge by studying the small neuronal non-messenger RNAs, namely BC1 RNA in rodents and BC200 RNA in primates. BC1 is the first identified master gene generating a subclass of ID repetitive elements, and BC200 is the only known Alu element (monomeric) that was exapted as a novel small RNA encoding gene.