Solvent-modified solid-phase microextraction for the determination of diazepam in human plasma samples by capillary gas chromatography

Solid-phase microextraction - a future technique in pharmacology and coating trends

Traditional sample preparation techniques based on liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) or solid-phase extraction (SPE) often suffer from a major error due to the matrix effects caused by significant co-extraction of matrix components. The implementation of a modern extraction technique such as solid-phase microextraction (SPME) was aimed at reducing analysis time and the use of organic solvents, as well as eliminating pre-analytical and analytical errors. Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is an innovative technique for extracting low molecular weight compounds (less than 1500 Da) from highly complex matrices, including biological matrices. It has a wide range of applications in various types of analysis including pharmaceutical, clinical, metabolomics and proteomics. SPME has a number of advantages over other extraction techniques. Among the most important are low environmental impact, the ability to sample and preconcentrate analytes in one step, simple automation, and the ability to extract multiple analytes simultaneously. It is expected to become, in the future, another method for cell cycle research. Numerous available literature sources prove that solid-phase microextraction can be a future technique in many scientific fields, including pharmaceutical sciences. This paper provides a literature review of trends in SPME coatings and pharmacological applications.

High Performance Liquid Chromatographic Method for Direct Determination of Diazepam in Whole Blood and Serum - Optimization of Solid-Phase Extraction Method

Herein, we present a simple and rapid high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method with UV-detection for the direct determination of diazepam in whole blood and serum that can be used for monitoring diazepam levels in clinical samples analysis. The isolation of diazepam and the internal standard bromazepam from serum and whole blood samples was performed using solid phase extraction method with RP select B cartridges. The analytes were separated employing a reversed phase C8 column with a mobile phase composed of 0.1 % (V/V) triethylamine in water (pH 3.5) and acetonitrile (63:37, V/V). UV detection was carried out at 240 nm. Linearity was achieved in the range from 10.0-1000.0 ng/ml for serum and whole blood. The method was applied to spiked and real biological samples after an oral administration of 10 mg diazepam. In conclusion, the proposed method is simple, rapid and provides efficient clean-up of the complex biological matrix and high recovery of diazepam.

Solid phase microextraction and related techniques for drugs in biological samples

In drug discovery and development, the quantification of drugs in biological samples is an important task for the determination of the physiological performance of the investigated drugs. After sampling, the next step in the analytical process is sample preparation. Because of the low concentration levels of drug in plasma and the variety of the metabolites, the selected extraction technique should be virtually exhaustive. Recent developments of sample handling techniques are directed, from one side, toward automatization and online coupling of sample preparation units. The primary objective of this review is to present the recent developments in microextraction sample preparation methods for analysis of drugs in biological fluids. Microextraction techniques allow for less consumption of solvent, reagents, and packing materials, and small sample volumes can be used. In this review the use of solid phase microextraction (SPME), microextraction in packed sorbent (MEPS), and stir-bar sorbtive extraction (SBSE) in drug analysis will be discussed. In addition, the use of new sorbents such as monoliths and molecularly imprinted polymers will be presented.

Microextraction techniques in therapeutic drug monitoring

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), as part of clinical process of medical treatments, is commonly used to maintain 'therapeutic' drug concentrations. TDM is useful to identify the causes of unwanted or unexpected responses, to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing, to improve clinical outcomes, and even to save lives. The determination of drug concentration in blood samples requires an excellent sample preparation procedure. Recent trends in sample preparation include miniaturization, automation, high-throughput performance, on-line coupling with analytical instruments and low-cost operation through extremely low or no solvent consumption. Microextraction techniques, such as liquid- and solid-phase microextraction, have these advantages over the traditional techniques. This paper reviews the recent developments in microextraction techniques used for drug monitoring in serum, plasma or blood samples.

A comparative study of UV-spectrophotometry and first-order derivative UV-spectrophotometry methods for the estimation of diazepam in presence of Tween-20 and propylene glycol

Nonionic surfactants like polysorbates (Tweens) and co-surfactant like propylene glycol are used in pharmaceutical dosage forms, like microemulsion of diazepam. These additives interfere significantly with the estimation of diazepam by UV spectrophotomery method. The aim of this work was to develop a first-order derivative UV-spectrophotometry method that can estimate diazepam in presence of Tween-20 and propylene glycol. The experimental results clearly suggested that, in comparison with the UV-spectrophotometry method, the first-order derivative UV-spectrophotometry is a simple method to estimate diazepam with sufficient accuracy, specificity, and precision even in the presence of 282-times Tween-20 and 2,072-times propylene glycol.

Development of a solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method for the determination of pentachlorophenol in human plasma using experimental design

A new method, headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) with in situ derivatization and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), which was used for the determination of trace amount of pentachlorophenol (PCP) in human plasma was presented. The acetylation derivatization reaction was firstly optimized using a Doehlert design. Then a series of parameters relevant to the headspace SPME procedure, including fiber coating, extraction temperature, extraction time and salt addition, were optimized using a two-level full factorial design expanded further to a central composite design. The validation of method showed that the optimized method had good linearity (R(2)=0.999) within the concentration ranges 0.1-50.0ngml(-1), and was sensitive with the limit of detection of 0.02ngml(-1). Intra- and inter-day precision for pentachlorophenol in human plasma samples were not greater than 11.9% and 12.6%, respectively. The proposed method, to our knowledge, describes the first application of HS-SPME with GC-MS for analysis of PCP in blood plasma sample. Application of the method to real human plasma samples, PCP was successfully detected in some cases at concentration levels 1.2-6.3ngml(-1).

A Simple Flow Injection Spectrophotometric Procedure for the Determination of Diazepam in Pharmaceutical Formulation

A single-channel flow injection (FI) manifold with spectrophotometric detection has been designed and fabricated for diazepam determination. A 100 microl sample and/or standard solution containing diazepam was injected into a flowing stream of 0.1 mol L(-1) hydrochloric acid with the optimum flow rate of 6.8 mL min(-1). As soon as the sample reached the detector, the FI signal as a peak was recorded at 360 nm. The optimum conditions for microg amounts of diazepam were achieved. A linear calibration graph over the range of 2-110 mg L(-1) diazepam was obtained with the regression equation Y = 0.2926X + 0.5896 (r2 = 0.9929). The method was very sensitive, since as little as 0.60 mg L(-1) could be detected; very reproducible with an RSD of 3.3% (n=11); and very rapid with a sampling rate of 100 h(-1). The limit of quantitation (10 sigma) was 2.0 mg L(-1). The proposed FI procedure has been satisfactorily applied to the quantitation of diazepam in commercial pharmaceutical formulations. The obtained results were in excellent agreement with those obtained by the conventional spectrophotometric method, verified by the student t-test at the 95% confidence level.

Determination of phosphoric acid triesters in human plasma using solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

A simple and sensitive method for determination of phosphoric acid triesters at trace levels in human plasma sample is described. In this work, solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is employed as a sample preparation procedure for extraction and pre-concentration of alkyl and aryl phosphates followed by gas chromatography coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (GC-ICP-MS) for phosphorus-specific and very sensitive determination of these compounds in human plasma. The detection limits from blood plasma were 50 ngL(-1) (tripropyl phosphate), 17 ngL(-1) (tributyl phosphate), 240 ngL(-1) (tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate) and 24 ngL(-1) (triphenyl phosphate). Sample preparation involves plasma deproteinization followed by direct immersion SPME with 65 microm poly(dimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene) fiber. Extraction was performed at 40 degrees C for 30 min and at pH 7.0 in 10 mM sodium carbonate buffer. The reported method, to our knowledge, describes the first application of SPME with element-specific detection for analysis of phosphoric acid esters. Application of the method to the plasma samples, previously stored in poly(vinyl chloride) plasma bags revealed the presence of triphenyl phosphate, which was further confirmed by SPME GC time-of-flight high-resolution mass spectrometry.

Two-Step Liquid−Liquid−Liquid Microextraction of Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs in Wastewater

A simple and novel two-step liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction technique combined with reversed-phase HPLC has been developed for the determination of the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs ibuprofen and 2-(4-chlorophenoxy)-2-methylpropionic acid in wastewater samples. In the first step, the analytes were extracted from an acidified sample (donor solution) into 1-octanol immobilized in the pores of 10 pieces of polypropylene hollow fiber and further into a basic acceptor phase inside the hollow fiber channels. This first extraction step, using 0.01 M NaOH as the acceptor phase and 0.1 M HCl within the donor phase, had a 100% relative recovery with an enrichment factor of 100-fold. The extract in the first step was then adjusted to acidic condition with HCl. It now represented the donor phase for the second step of the extraction, using a single piece of hollow fiber, with 2 microL of 0.01 M NaOH solution as the acceptor phase. This analyte-enriched acceptor phase was subsequently withdrawn into a microsyringe and directly injected into an HPLC system for analysis. With this two-step microextraction, sensitivity enhancement of >15,000-fold could be obtained. Detection limits of < or =100 ng/L could be achieved for both compounds. The method was applied to the analysis of wastewater.

Determination of amitraz in canine plasma by solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography with thermionic specific detection

A simple and rapid analytical method is presented for the determination of amitraz in canine plasma samples using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and gas chromatography with thermionic specific detection (GC-TSD). The best conditions for the SPME procedure were: direct extraction on a polydimethlysiloxane (PDMS) fiber with 100-microm film thickness; 400 &microl of sample plasma matrix modified with 4 ml sodium borate solution (0.01 mol l(-1), pH 6.5); extraction temperature 70 degrees C, with stirring at 2500 rpm for 45 min. The method was linear between 20 and 400 ng ml(-1) with regression coefficients corresponding to 0.998 and coefficient of the variation of the points of the calibration curve lower than 15%. The lowest limit of quantification (LOQ) for amitraz in plasma was 20 ng ml(-1). This LOQ was determined as the lowest concentration on the calibration curve in which the coefficient of variation was lower than 15%. The proposed method was applied to determine amitraz concentrations in canine plasma to look for toxicity after treatment with amitraz in a dipping bath.

Solid-phase microextraction of human plasma samples for determination of sufentanil by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

A solid-phase microextraction (SPME) method has been developed for the quantitative analysis of sufentanil from human plasma by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The immersion SPME sampling technique was optimized for the extraction of sufentanil from plasma. The influence of the pH and the ionic strength of the sample on the extraction of the analytes by the SPME fiber were investigated. Sufentanil and fentanyl (internal standard) were extracted from plasma with a 65-microm polydimethylsiloxane-divinylbenzene (PDMS-DVB) fiber for 30 minutes using salting out agents in basic conditions. The calibration curve was linear over a concentration range of 6-50 ng/mL. Intraday and interday relative standard deviations were 3.6% and 10.6%, respectively. The limit of quantification was 6 ng/mL for a plasma volume of 1 mL. With regard to selectivity, simplicity, and low cost, the SPME method described should be useful for a rapid extraction of sufentanil from human plasma.

Analysis of certain tranquilizers in biological fluids

A review with 282 references is presented that deals with the reported methods of analysis of phenothiazines, thioxanthenes, and benzodiazepine derivatives of pharmaceutical interest. The review includes the methods adapted in biological fluids.

High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of diazepam in plasma of children with severe malaria

A sensitive, selective and reproducible reversed-phase HPLC method with ultraviolet detection was developed for the quantification of diazepam in small plasma samples from children with severe malaria. The method involves plasma deproteinization with acetonitrile, followed by liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl acetate-n-hexane. Diazepam was eluted at ambient temperatures from a reversed-phase C18 column with an acidic (pH 3.5) aqueous mobile phase (10 mM KH2PO4-acetonitrile, 69:31, v/v). Calibration curves in spiked plasma were linear from 10 to 200 ng (r2 > or = 0.99). The limit of detection was 5.0 ng/ml, and relative recoveries at 25 and 180 ng were >87%. Intra- and inter-assay relative standard deviations were <15%. There was no interference from drugs commonly administered to children with severe malaria (phenobarbitone, phenytoin, chloroquine, quinine, sulfadoxine, pyrimethamine, halofantrine, cycloguanil, chlorcycloguanil, acetaminophen and salicylate). This method has been used for monitoring plasma diazepam concentrations in children with seizures associated with severe malaria.

Determination of midazolam in human plasma by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry

A new method is described for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of midazolam, a short-acting 1,4-imidazole benzodiazepine, in human plasma. It involves a plasma deproteinization step, solid-phase microextraction (SPME) of midazolam using an 85-microm polyacrylate fiber, and its detection by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) in selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode, using pinazepam as internal standard. The assay is linear over a midazolam plasma range of 1.5-300 ng/mL, relative intra- and inter-assay standard deviations at 5 ng/mL are below 7%, and the limit of detection is 1 ng/mL. The method is simple, fast and sufficiently sensitive to be applied in clinical and forensic toxicology as well as for purposes of therapeutic drug monitoring.

Microextraction of drugs

This review will attempt to provide an overview as well as a theoretical and practical understanding of the use of microextraction technologies for drug analysis. The majority of the published reports to date focus on the use of fibre solid-phase microextraction and so the review is significantly focused on this technology. Other areas of microextraction such as single drop and solvent film microextraction are also described. Where there are insufficient examples in the literature to illustrate important concepts, examples of non-drug analyses are presented. The review is intended for readers new to the field of microextraction or its use in drug extraction, but also provides an overview of the most recent advances in the field which may be of interest to more experienced users. Particular emphasis is placed on the effect various sample matrices have on extraction characteristics.

Solid-phase microextraction for the assay of levomepromazine in human plasma

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) was investigated as sample preparation for the assay of the neuroleptic drug levomepromazine in human plasma. A mixture of human plasma, water, chloramitriptyline as internal standard, and aqueous NaOH was extracted with a 100-microm polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) fiber (Supelco). The desorption of the fiber was performed in the injection port of a gas chromatograph at 260 degrees C [HP 5890; BPX-5 (SGE): 30 m x 0.53 mm ID, 1-microm film capillary; nitrogen-phosphorus selective detection]. As repeatedly found for SPME analysis of drugs in plasma, the recovery was low (i.e., 7% for levomepromazine). However, the analyte and internal standard were well separated and the calibration was linear from 5 to 180 ng/mL. The within-day precision was 2%, 4%, and 19% at concentrations of 160 ng/mL, 80 ng/mL, and 5 ng/mL, respectively. The between-day precision was 3%, 7%, and 19%, respectively. The limit of determination was 5 ng/mL. The comparison with an established liquid-liquid extraction gas-liquid chromatography method revealed good agreement for spiked samples and patient samples. No interfering peaks of drugs coadministered with levomepromazine or of endogenous substances were found. It is concluded that the method can be used in the therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical toxicology of levomepromazine.

Solid-phase microextraction in biomedical analysis

Chromatographic methods are preferred in the analysis of organic molecules with lower molecular mass (<500 g/mol) in body fluids, i.e., the assay of drugs, metabolites, endogenous substances and poisons as well as of environmental exposure by gas chromatography (GC) and liquid chromatography (LC), for example. Sample preparation in biomedical analysis is mainly performed by liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase extraction. However, new methods are investigated with the aim to increase the sample throughput and to improve the quality of analytical methods. Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) was introduced about a decade ago and it was mainly applied to environmental and food analysis. All steps of sample preparation, i.e., extraction, concentration, derivatization and transfer to the chromatograph, are integrated in one step and in one device. This is accomplished by the intelligent combination of an immobilized extraction solvent (a polymer) with a special geometry (a fiber within a syringe). It was a challenge to test this novel principle in biomedical analysis. Thus, an introduction is provided to the theory of SPME in the present paper. A critical review of the first applications to biomedical analyses is presented in the main paragraph. The optimization of SPME as well as advantages and disadvantages are discussed. It is concluded that, because of some unique characteristics, SPME can be introduced with benefit into several areas of biomedical analysis. In particular, the application of headspace SPME-GC-MS in forensic toxicology and environmental medicine appears to be promising. However, it seems that SPME will not become a universal method. Thus, on-line SPE-LC coupling with column-switching technique may be a good alternative if an analytical problem cannot be sufficiently dealt with by SPME.

Liquid-phase microextraction as a sample preparation technique prior to capillary gas chromatographic-determination of benzodiazepines in biological matrices

Liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) and gas chromatography were applied to determine diazepam and the main metabolite N-desmethyldiazepam in human urine and plasma. The analytes were extracted from 3.0-3.5 ml sample volumes directly into 25 microl of extraction solvent. The microextraction device consisted of a porous hollow fiber of polypropylene attached to two guiding needles inserted through a septum and a 4 ml vial. The hollow fiber filled with extraction solvent was immersed in sample solution. The extraction device was continuously vibrated at 600 rpm for 50 min. An aliquot (1 microl) of the extraction solvent with preconcentrated analytes was injected directly into the capillary gas chromatograph. Thirty samples were extracted simultaneously on the vibrator, providing a high sample capacity. The limits of detection were from 0.020 to 0.115 nmol/ml for diazepam and N-desmethyldiazepam in plasma and urine using a nitrogen-phosphorus detector (NPD).

Solid-phase micro-extraction of drugs from biological matrices

Solid phase micro-extraction was originally designed as a technique for the solvent-free analysis of volatile organic contaminants in environmental samples. However, a wide variety of applications are now being pursued, including the analysis of drugs from a variety of matrices. In this review, the analysis of drugs by SPME from biological and related matrices, including water, urine, blood, hair and saliva, is discussed. A general overview of the special problems and techniques involved in SPME from biological matrices is presented, along with specific references and discussion of the analysis of many types of drugs and metabolites. It is seen that SPME is a highly versatile and flexible technique for these analyses.

Development of a simple in-vial liquid-phase microextraction device for drug analysis compatible with capillary gas chromatography, capillary electrophoresis and high-performance liquid chromatography

A simple, inexpensive and disposable device for liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) is presented for use in combination with capillary gas chromatography (GC), capillary electrophoresis (CE) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). 1-4 ml samples of human urine or plasma were filled into conventional 4-ml vials, whereafter 15-25 microl of the extraction medium (acceptor solution) was filled into a short piece of a porous hollow fiber and placed into the sample vial. The drugs of interest were extracted from the sample solutions and into the small volumes of acceptor solution based on high partition coefficients and were preconcentrated by a factor of 30-125. For LPME in combination with GC, the porous hollow fiber was filled with 15 microl n-octanol as the acceptor solution. Following 30 min of extraction, the organic acceptor solution was injected directly into the GC system. For LPME in combination with CE and HPLC, n-octanol was immobilized within the pores of the hollow fiber, while the internal volume of the fiber was filled with either 25 microl of 0.1 M HCl (for extraction of basic compounds) or 25 microl 0.02 M NaOH (for acidic compounds). Following 45 min extraction, the aqueous acceptor solution was injected directly into the CE or HPLC system. Owing to the low cost, the extraction devices were disposed after a single extraction which eliminated the possibility of carry over effects. In addition, because no expensive instrumentation was required for LPME, 10-30 samples were extracted in parallel to provide a high number of samples per unit time capacity.

Determination of lidocaine in plasma by direct solid-phase microextraction combined with gas chromatography

Direct-immersion solid-phase microextraction (SPME) has been used to extract the local anesthetic lidocaine from human plasma. A simplified model shows the relationship between the total amount of drug in plasma and the amount of drug extracted. The model takes into account that the drug participates between the fiber, sample and proteins. Therefore the model can also be used to obtain a good approximation of the drug-protein binding. Extraction yields of lidocaine in plasma are <1%, and the protein binding of lidocaine was found to be about 74% at pH 9.5. A SPME method has been developed for the determination of the total amount of lidocaine in plasma. The protein binding was reduced by acidification and, subsequently, the sample was deproteinized with trichloroacetic acid. With a 100-microm polydimethylsiloxane-coated fiber and addition of sodium chloride to the sample an extraction yield of about 12% at equilibrium (45 min) has been obtained. The relative standard deviation of this method is <10%. A linear range was found from 25 to 2000 ng ml(-1) lidocaine in plasma (r=0.998) with a detection limit of 5 ng ml(-1) in plasma. An extraction yield of about 80% could be obtained after an overnight extraction by use of a 65-microm polydimethylsiloxane-divinylbenzene-coated fiber. If an extraction time of 10 min is used with this fiber, the same yield is obtained as with the single-phase fiber in 45 min. However, the drawback of this mixed-phase fiber is its much shorter lifetime.

Fishing for a drug: solid-phase microextraction for the assay of clozapine in human plasma

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) was investigated as a sample preparation method for assaying the neuroleptic drug clozapine in human plasma. A mixture of human plasma, water, loxapine (as internal standard) and aqueous NaOH was extracted with a 100-micron polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) fiber (Supelco). Desorption of the fiber was performed in the injection port of a gas chromatograph at 260 degrees C (HP 5890; 30 m x 0.53 mm I.D., 1 micron film capillary; nitrogen-phosphorous selective detection). Fibers were used repeatedly in up to about 75 analyses. The recovery was found to be 3% for clozapine from plasma after 30 min of extraction. However, in spite of the low recovery, the analyte was well separated and the calibration was linear between 100 and 1000 ng/ml. The within-day and between-day precision was consistently about 8 to 15% at concentrations of 200 ng/ml to 1000 ng/ml. No interfering drug was found. The limit of detection was 30 ng/ml. The sample volume was 250 microliters. The influence of the concentration of proteins, triglycerides and salt, i.e., changes in the matrix on the peak areas and peak-area ratios was studied. The method is not impaired by physiological changes in the composition of the matrix. Good agreement was found with a liquid-liquid extraction-gas-liquid chromatography (LLE-GLC) standard method and an on-line column-switching high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for patients' samples and spiked samples, respectively. It is concluded that the method can be used in the therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine because the therapeutic window of clozapine is from 350 to 600 ng/ml.

Rapid analysis of tetracycline antibiotics by combined solid phase microextraction/high performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry

The technique of solid phase microextraction (SPME) combined on-line with high performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS) has been applied to the analysis of seven tetracycline analogues. Rapid baseline separation was achieved in under 5 min using a short 3 microm RP-18e cartridge column. Optimisation of the SPME procedure is described including choice of extracting fibre and modification of the sample by heating or salting out of the analytes. Detection limits of 4-40 ng/mL were obtained for the various analogues from extracted aqueous samples and absolute amounts of analyte extracted by the method determined using external calibration. To demonstrate the applicability of the technique for real samples the extraction of tetracycline from milk is described.

Determination of benzodiazepines in human urine and plasma with solvent modified solid phase micro extraction and gas chromatography; rationalisation of method development using experimental design strategies

Solid phase micro extraction (SPME) and gas chromatographic analysis was used for the analysis of several benzodiazepines (oxazepam, diazepam, nordiazepam, flunitrazepam and alprazolam) in human urine and plasma. Several factors likely to affect the analyte recovery were screened in a fractional factorial design in order to examine their effect on the extraction recovery. Parameters found significant in the screening were further investigated with the use of response surface methodology. The final conditions for extraction of benzodiazepines were as follows: Octanol was immobilised on a polyacrylate fibre for 4 min. The fibre was placed in the sample and extraction took place at pH 6.0 for 15 min. Urine samples were added to 0.3 g ml(-1) sodium chloride. In plasma, the extraction recovery was less than in urine and releasing the benzodiazepines from plasma proteins followed by protein precipitation was found necessary prior to sampling. The method was validated and found linear over the range of samples. The limits of detection in urine were determined to be in the range 0.01-0.45 micromol l(-1). The corresponding limits of detection in plasma were in the range 0.01-0.48 micromol l(-1). Finally, the method developed was applied to determine some benzodiazepines after administration of a single dose. This method offers sufficient enrichment for bioanalysis after a single dose of high dose benzodiazepines as diazepam, but for low dose benzodiazepines as flunitrazepam, further sensitivity is needed.

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) of drugs and poisons from biological samples

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME), a new solvent-free sample preparation technique, was invented by C. Arthur and J. Pawliszyn in 1990. This method mainly was applied for the extraction of volatile and semi-volatile organic pollutants in water samples. However, since 1995, SPME has been developed to various biological samples, such as whole blood, plasma, urine, hair and breath, in order to extract drugs and poisons in forensic field. The main advantages of SPME are: high sensitivity, solventless, small sample volume, simplicity and rapidity. We have reviewed the papers published in recent years about SPME in biological samples, and sorted out main experimental conditions, such as fibers, matrixes, the extraction approaches and time, as well as the acceleration method. We would expect SPME technique to have a promising future for toxicological analysis in forensic practice.

Methods for the measurement of benzodiazepines in biological samples

A review of methods for the measurement of benzodiazepines in biological specimens published over the last five years is presented. A range of immunoassay procedures using EIA, ELISA, FPIA, agglutination or kinetic interaction of microparticles, or RIA methods are now available. Cross reactivities to benzodiazepines are variable such that no one kit will recognise all benzodiazepines and their relevant metabolites at concentrations likely to be encountered during therapeutic use. Prior hydrolysis of urine to convert glucuronide metabolites to immunoreactive substances improves detection limits for many benzodiazepines. Several radioreceptor assays have now been published and show good sensitivity and specificity to benzodiazepines and offer the advantage (over immunoassay) of being able to detect these drugs with equal sensitivity. Solvent extraction techniques using a variety of solvents were still popular and offer acceptable recoveries and lack of significant interference from other substances. A number of papers describing solid phase extraction procedures were also published. Direct injection of specimens into a HPLC column with back flushing were also successfully described. Seventy two chromatographic methods using HPLC, LC-MS, GC and GC-MS methods were reviewed. HPLC was able to achieve detection limits for many benzodiazepines using UV or DAD detection down to 1-2 ng/ml using 1-2 ml of urine or serum (blood). ECD detectors gave detection limits better than 1 ng/ml from 1 ml of specimen, which was an order of magnitude lower than for NPD. EI-MS offered similar sensitivity, whilst NCI-MS was capable of detection down to 0.1 ng/ml. Methods suitable for the separation of enantiomers of benzodiazepines have been described using HPLC. Electrokinetic micellar chromatography has also been shown to be capable of the analysis of benzodiazepines in urine.

Determination of cannabinoids in water and human saliva by solid-phase microextraction and quadrupole ion trap gas chromatography/mass spectrometry

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is applied to the determination of cannabidiol, delta 8-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 8-THC), delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 9-THC), and cannabinol in pure water and human saliva. The inherent extraction behavior of the cannabinoids in pure water is evaluated along with optimization of the method in human saliva. The commercially available poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) SPME fibers were found to be the best class for the cannabinoid analysis. Partition coefficients were found to be extremely large for all of the cannabinoids (log K > 4.0). Equilibrium times for the 7- and 30-micron PDMS fibers were 50 and 240 min, respectively. A shorter extraction time of 10 min with the 30-micron PDMS fiber may be used for multiple extractions from the same vial, thus conserving the sample necessary for analysis and speeding up the total analysis time. Recoveries for the cannabinoids in saliva, relative to pure water, were dramatically improved by a method developed in our laboratory involving addition of glacial acetic acid to the sample vial prior to performing SPME. Using this method, recoveries relative to SPME in pure water ranged from 21 to 47% depending on the cannabinoid. The linear range for spiked saliva samples was established at 5-500 ng/mL (r2 > 0.994) with precisions between 11 and 20% RSD. The ultimate level of detection by SPME for the cannabinoids in saliva was 1.0 ng/mL, with signal-to-noise values of > or = 12. A saliva sample collected 30 min after marijuana smoking was subject to SPME and traditional liquid-liquid extraction analysis. Internal standard quantitation results for delta 9-THC by both methods yielded comparable results, indicating that the SPME method of analysis is highly accurate and precise. The level of delta 9-THC by SPME was found to be 9.54 ng/mL for the saliva sample.