The evolving role of direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes

Mechanisms of thrombosis and research progress on targeted antithrombotic drugs

Globally, the incidence of thromboembolic diseases has increased in recent years, accompanied by an increase in patient mortality. Currently, several targeting delivery strategies have been developed to treat thromboembolic diseases. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of thrombolysis and current anticoagulant drugs, particularly those with targeting capability, highlighting advances in the accurate treatment of thrombolysis with fewer adverse effects. Such approaches include magnetic drug-loading systems combined with molecular imaging to recanalize blood vessels and systems based on chimeric Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequences that can target platelet glycoprotein receptor. With such progress in targeted antithrombotic drugs, targeted thrombolysis treatment shows significant potential benefit for patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Bivalirudin Versus Heparins in Reduction of Cardiac Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Recent data suggest that bivalirudin, a reversible direct thrombin inhibitor, may be noninferior to heparins (unfractionated heparin/low molecular weight heparin) in providing protection against cardiovascular events, with significantly fewer bleeding complications. Whether this advantage is consistent has not been fully defined. We evaluated cardiac outcomes with bivalirudin vs the heparins in management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), including patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Formal computer-aided searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry) were performed by scrutiny of the reference lists of trials and review articles, abstracts, meeting proceedings, and the manufacturers of direct thrombin inhibitors. Five randomized controlled trials (BAT, 1995; CACHET, 2002; REPLACE-2, 2003; REPLACE-1, 2004; and ACUITY, 2006) comparing bivalirudin to the heparins in patients with ACS, including patients undergoing PCI, were identified. The meta-analysis consisted of 25 457 patients (bivalirudin, 15 077; heparins, 10 380). The primary safety end point was major bleeding, defined as intracranial, intraocular, or retroperitoneal hemorrhage; clinically overt blood loss leading to a hemoglobin drop exceeding 3 g/dL (or 10% of hematocrit) and transfusion of 2 or more units of whole blood or packed red blood cells. The combined relative risks (RR) across all of the studies and the 95% confidence intervals of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and revascularization (bivalirudin vs heparins) were computed using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model, whereas the random-effect model was used for major bleeding. A 2-sided α error < .05 was considered to be significant. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the 2 groups. Compared to the heparins, the risk of death, MI, revascularization, and composite ischemic end points were similar with bivalirudin monotherapy. However, the risk of major bleeding was significantly lower with bivalirudin use (RR = 0.553; 95% CI = 0.402-0.761; P = .001). The present meta-analysis suggests that bivalirudin may be noninferior to the heparins in reducing the composite of ischemic end points. Additionally, compared to the heparins, bivalirudin monotherapy may lower the rate of major bleeding.

Acute Coronary Syndromes: Unstable Angina and Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) encompass the clinical entities of unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Several advances have occurred over the past decade, including the emergence of new antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapies and novel treatment strategies, leading to marked improvements in mortality. However, there has also been an increased incidence in NSTE-ACS as a result of the use of high-sensitivity troponins and the increase in cardiovascular risk factors. This article provides a focused update on contemporary management strategies pertaining to antiplatelet, antithrombotic, and anti-ischemic therapies and to revascularization strategies in patients with ACS.

Dichotomous effects of exposure to bivalirudin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention on protease-activated receptor-mediated platelet activation

Bivalirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor that is increasingly used in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and has been previously shown to lack inherent platelet activation. Thrombin works through activation of protease activated receptor-1 (PAR1) and PAR4 on human platelets to initiate signaling cascades leading to platelet aggregation. Despite the increasing usage of bivalirudin, the effects on platelet function have not been well defined. Bivalirudin exposure during PCI was therefore assessed for its potential short-term effects on washed platelet function through PAR1 and PAR4. Bivalirudin significantly inhibited low-dose thrombin-mediated platelet aggregation, dense granule secretion, integrin αIIbβ3 activation and Rap1 activation and high dose thrombin-mediated dense granule secretion and Rap1 activation. Exposure to bivalirudin did not alter PAR1 or 4 agonist peptide (PAR1-AP or PAR4-AP) induced aggregation, dense granule secretion, integrin glycoprotein IIbIIIa activation or Rap1 activation. However, exposure to bivalirudin significantly potentiated surface expression of P-selectin following stimulation with high dose thrombin and PAR1-AP, and both low and high dose PAR4-AP. Hence, our data are the first to show that exposure to bivalirudin increased P-selectin expression with certain conditions demonstrating that bivalirudin can increase inherent platelet activity.

Antiplatelet and antithrombin strategies in acute coronary syndrome: state-of-the-art review

Antiplatelet and antithrombotic agents significantly alter the clinical course of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and hence form the bedrock of the management pathway of this closely related continuum of coronary pathologies. The contemporary therapeutic armamentarium for the treatment of ACS now reflects the many technical and pharmacological advances that took place over the last two decades. In the original 1996 American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction, only one antiplatelet agent (Aspirin) and one anticoagulant (unfractionated heparin) were recommended as class I therapies. Since then many newer agents have been developed and approved for routine clinical use in ACS patients. Recent research has focussed on improving efficacy on one hand and reducing bleeding complications on the other. This review focuses on the mechanism, efficacy, safety profile and clinical trial evidence of P2 Y12 receptor antagonist antiplatelet agents, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (GPI), protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) inhibitors, thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin and Factor Xa inhibitors fondaparinaux and rivaroxaban.

Direct thrombin inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists or low molecular weight heparins for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement

BACKGROUND

Patients who have undergone total hip or knee replacement (THR, TKR) have a high risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) following surgery, despite appropriate anticoagulation with warfarin or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). New anticoagulants are under investigation.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the efficacy and safety of prophylactic anticoagulation with direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) versus LMWH or vitamin K antagonists in the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing THR or TKR.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Disease Group searched their Specialized Register (last searched 12 March 2010) and CENTRAL (last searched 2010, Issue 2).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three reviewers independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data in pre-designed tables. The reported follow-up events were included

MAIN RESULTS

We included 14 studies included involving 21,642 patients evaluated for efficacy and 27,360 for safety. No difference was observed in major VTE in DTIs compared with LMWH in both types of operations (odds ratio (OR) 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69 to 1.19), with high heterogeneity (I(2) 71%). No difference was observed with warfarin (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.15) in TKR, with no heterogeneity (I(2) 0%).More total bleeding events were observed in the DTI group (in ximelagatran and dabigatran but not in desirudin) in patients subjected to THR (OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.06, 1.85; I(2) 41%) compared with LMWH. No difference was observed with warfarin in TKR (OR 1.76; 95% CI 0.91 to 3.38; I(2) 0%). All-cause mortality was higher in the DTI group when the reported follow-up events were included (OR 2.06; 95% CI 1.10 to 3.87).Studies that initiated anticoagulation before surgery showed less VTE events; those that began anticoagulation after surgery showed more VTE events in comparison with LMWH. Therefore, the effect of the DTIs compared with LMWH appears to be influenced by the time of initiation of coagulation more than the effect of the drug itself.The results obtained from sensitivity analysis, did not differ from the analysed results; this strengthens the value of the results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Direct thrombin inhibitors are as effective in the prevention of major venous thromboembolism in THR or TKR as LMWH and vitamin K antagonists. However, they show higher mortality and cause more bleeding than LMWH. No severe hepatic complications were reported in the analysed studies. Use of ximelagatran is not recommended for VTE prevention in patients who have undergone orthopedic surgery. More studies are necessary regarding dabigatran.

Bivalirudin decreases NO bioavailability by vascular immobilization of myeloperoxidase

Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has emerged as an important alternative to heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, it remains elusive if potentially adverse extracoagulant properties are responsible for the fact that its favorable effects in clinical studies are mainly driven by a reduction in bleeding events. The aim of the current study was to determine the effects and mechanisms of acute treatment with bivalirudin in comparison to heparin on NO bioavailability, an important factor for the pathogenesis of ischemic events. In particular, we studied the interaction between bivalirudin and myeloperoxidase (MPO), a leukocyte-derived enzyme that consumes endothelial-derived nitric oxide (NO), modifies a variety of biological targets, and thus affects the integrity of the vessel wall. In patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention, bivalirudin, in contrast to heparin, exhibited a significant decrease in plasma MPO levels (p = 0.03) accompanied by a deterioration of flow-mediated dilation (p = 0.02), a surrogate for endothelial NO bioavailability. In vitro experiments revealed avid binding of bivalirudin to both bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAEC) and MPO. Methylation of bivalirudin carboxyl groups at the carboxyl-terminal end revealed the specific binding site of bivalirudin to MPO. Bivalirudin-facilitated binding of MPO to BAEC resulted also in functional changes in terms of increased NO consumption as well as enhanced MPO-mediated redox modifications. These results illustrate dichotomous extracoagulant properties of heparins and thrombin inhibitors and suggest that bivalirudin acutely impairs endothelial NO bioavailability, thereby underscoring the potentially critical role of MPO as a mediator of vascular function.

Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Whether bivalirudin is superior to unfractionated heparin in patients with stable or unstable angina who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after pretreatment with clopidogrel is unknown.

METHODS

We enrolled 4570 patients with stable or unstable angina (with normal levels of troponin T and creatine kinase MB) who were undergoing PCI after pretreatment with a 600-mg dose of clopidogrel at least 2 hours before the procedure; 2289 patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive bivalirudin, and 2281 to receive unfractionated heparin. The primary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, urgent target-vessel revascularization due to myocardial ischemia within 30 days after randomization, or major bleeding during the index hospitalization (with a net clinical benefit defined as a reduction in the incidence of the end point). The secondary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target-vessel revascularization.

RESULTS

The incidence of the primary end point was 8.3% (190 patients) in the bivalirudin group as compared with 8.7% (199 patients) in the unfractionated-heparin group (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.15; P=0.57). The secondary end point occurred in 134 patients (5.9%) in the bivalirudin group and 115 patients (5.0%) in the unfractionated-heparin group (relative risk, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.49; P=0.23). The incidence of major bleeding was 3.1% (70 patients) in the bivalirudin group and 4.6% (104 patients) in the unfractionated-heparin group (relative risk, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.90; P=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stable and unstable angina who underwent PCI after pretreatment with clopidogrel, bivalirudin did not provide a net clinical benefit (i.e., it did not reduce the incidence of the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, urgent target-vessel revascularization, or major bleeding) as compared with unfractionated heparin, but it did significantly reduce the incidence of major bleeding. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00262054.)

Monocyte functional responsiveness after PSGL-1-mediated platelet adhesion is dependent on platelet activation status

OBJECTIVE

Acute coronary diseases are characterized by elevated levels of circulating platelet-leukocyte complexes, raising the possibility that proinflammatory processes might be initiated in leukocytes after platelet adhesion. Here we examined the mechanism of platelet binding to polymorphonuclear leukocytes, monocytes, and monocyte subsets and investigated the potential functional consequences of monocyte binding to minimally activated or thrombin-activated platelets.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this article, we describe key differences in terms of stability of PSGL-1-mediated interaction of platelets with monocytes and polymorphonuclear leukocytes and a small but significant difference in platelet binding to monocyte subsets (CD14(high) and CD14(low)/HLA-DR(high)). We also report differential effects of platelet binding on monocyte functional responses between minimally and thrombin-activated platelets. In particular, monocyte CD11b expression and release of proinflammatory cytokines, like interleukin 1beta and tumor necrosis factor alpha, were significantly upregulated on adhesion of stimulated platelets, whereas unstimulated platelets had no effect. Moreover, binding of unstimulated, but not of thrombin-activated, platelets to monocytes had no impact on NF-kappaB activity, monocyte migration, and induction of apoptosis in the absence of survival factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that in the absence of overt activation, PSGL-1-P-selectin-dependent platelet binding to monocytes represents a normal physiological process with little impact on the potential of monocytes to cause vascular injury.

The Harmonizing Outcomes with RevasculariZatiON and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) Trial: study design and rationale

BACKGROUND

Advances in coronary angioplasty and adjunct pharmacology have improved patient outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, several areas for improvement remain. Hemorrhagic complications, which are common in patients receiving intense anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents during primary PCI to suppress ischemia, have been strongly associated with early and late mortality. Moreover, restenosis after bare-metal stents (BMSs) frequently results in symptom recurrence and the need for repeat rehospitalization and revascularization procedures. Newer pharmacologic agents and drug-eluting stents may address both of these issues.

STUDY DESIGN

In the HORIZONS-AMI trial, 3,602 patients with AMI undergoing primary PCI were prospectively randomized to unfractionated heparin plus routine use of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors versus the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin plus provisional use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors reserved for predefined thrombotic complications. In a second randomization, 3,011 eligible patients were randomly assigned to either a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent or to an otherwise identical BMS. The study was powered for the assessment of sequential safety and efficacy end points for each specific randomization, with clinical end points assessed at 30 days, 1 year, and then annually for 5 years.

SUMMARY

The ongoing HORIZONS-AMI trial will determine whether bivalirudin monotherapy reduces bleeding complications and improves overall event-free survival compared with unfractionated heparin plus the routine use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing primary PCI for AMI. Furthermore, this study will determine whether paclitaxel-eluting stents safely reduce rates of ischemic target lesion revascularization compared with BMSs in the setting of primary PCI.

Acute coronary care in the elderly, part I: Non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology

BACKGROUND

Age is an important determinant of outcomes for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS); however, community practice reveals a disproportionately lower use of cardiovascular medications and invasive treatment even among elderly patients with ACS who would stand to benefit. Reasons include limited trial data to guide the care of older adults and uncertainty about benefits and risks, particularly with newer medications or invasive treatments and in the setting of advanced age or complex health status.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This 2-part American Heart Association scientific statement summarizes evidence on patient heterogeneity, clinical presentation, and treatment of non-ST-elevation ACS in relation to age (< 65, 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and > or = 85 years). In addition, we review methodological issues that influence the acquisition and application of evidence to the elderly patients treated in community practice. A writing group combining international cardiovascular and geriatric perspectives convened to summarize available data from trials (5 combined Virtual Coordinating Center for Global Collaborative Cardiovascular Research [VIGOUR] trials) and 3 registries (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events, National Registry of Myocardial Infarction, and the Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines national quality improvement initiative [CRUSADE]) to provide a conceptual framework for future work in the care of the elderly with acute cardiac disease. Treatment for non-ST-segment-elevation ACS (Part I) and ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (Part II) are reviewed. In addition, ethical considerations pertaining to acute care and secondary prevention are considered (Part II). The primary goal is to identify the areas in which sufficient evidence is available to guide practice, as well as to determine areas that warrant further study. Although treatment-related benefits should rise in an elderly population with high disease risk, data to assess these benefits are limited, outcomes of importance vary, and heterogeneity among the elderly increases treatment-related risks. Although a uniform approach to care in the oldest of the old is unlikely, understanding the major contributors to benefits and risks from treatment will advance the ability to apply guideline-based care in this subset of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a few recent trials have described treatment effects in older patients, others continue to exclude patients on the basis of age. Going forward, prospective trials should enroll elderly subjects proportionate to their prevalence among the treated population to define risk and benefit. Findings from age subgroup analyses should be reported in a consistent manner across trials, including absolute and relative risks for efficacy and safety. Outcomes of particular relevance to the elderly, such as quality of life, physical function, and independence, should also be considered. Creatinine clearance should be calculated for every elderly patient to enable appropriate dosing. In addition, physicians need an understanding of conditions unique to older patients (eg, frailty, cognitive impairment) that influence treatment goals and outcomes. With these efforts, treatment risks can be minimized, and benefits can be placed in the health context of the elderly patient with ACS.

Bivalirudin: Pharmacology and Clinical Applications

Bivalirudin (Hirulog, Angiomax) is a specific, reversible and direct thrombin inhibitor with a predictable anticoagulant effect. It is cleared by both proteolytic cleavage and renal mechanisms, predominantly glomerular filtration. Bivalirudin inhibits both circulating thrombin and fibrin bound thrombin directly by binding to thrombin catalytic site and anion-binding exosite I in a concentration-dependent manner. Bivalirudin prolongs activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, thrombin time and activated clotting time (ACT). ACT levels with bivalirudin do not correlate with its clinical efficacy. Bivalirudin with a provisional GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor is indicated in elective contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In respect to combined ischemic and hemorrhagic endpoints of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned urgent revascularization and major bleeding during PCI (including subgroups of patients with renal impairment and diabetes) bivalirudin is not inferior to unfractioned heparin and planned GpIIb/IIIa inhibitors. In addition, bivalirudin has been consistently shown to have significantly less in-hospital major bleeding than heparin alone or heparin in combination with a GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor. Bivalirudin appears to be also safe and effective during PCI in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Finally, data from PCI studies support the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin, although its direct randomized comparison with unfractionated heparin is lacking.

Antiplatelet therapy: current strategies and future trends

Pharmacological management of thrombotic complications is strongly influenced by antiplatelet treatment strategies. Recent clinical trials have clearly indicated that current antiplatelet strategies may not inhibit recurrent thrombotic events in selected patients and improvement is necessary. Recently, there has been a gradual modification in the guidelines for clopidogrel dosing. In addition, newly developed P2Y12 receptor inhibitors and thrombin inhibitors are undergoing Phase II and III clinical trials. Moreover, research related to novel agents that interfere with other steps in coagulation and platelet adhesion, and platelet thromboxane and thrombin receptor blockers, show promise. An important future step will probably be the development of personalized therapy based on defining the individual patient’s propensity for thrombosis through investigation of platelet–thrombin–fibrin interactions. Such an approach will enhance the targeting of specific therapy based on the pathophysiology of the individual patient.

Direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: effect in patients undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention

AIMS

We evaluated the effect of direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) in patients undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), using the DTI Trialists' Collaboration database of 35,970 patients from 11 randomized trials of DTIs vs. heparin.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis with PCI as a time-dependent covariate to assess the independent impact of DTIs according to the performance of early PCI. PCI was performed in 7049 patients in the first 72 h after randomization. In trials in which PCI was not planned, DTIs were associated with a 10% relative risk reduction in death or myocardial infarction at 30 days (HR=0.90, 95% CI: 0.84-0.97). This benefit was found to be greater in patients undergoing early PCI (HR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.48-0.91) than those undergoing non-early PCI (HR=0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-1.03). After adjustment for baseline characteristics and propensity to undergo PCI, the risk of death or myocardial infarction remained lower with DTI (HR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.44-0.89).

CONCLUSION

After adjustment for baseline differences and propensity to undergo early PCI, DTIs appeared to be more effective than heparin in reducing death or re-infarction among patients undergoing early PCI.

Bivalirudin as an Anticoagulation Agent: Safety and Efficacy in Peripheral Interventions

PURPOSE

Traditionally, unfractionated heparin is used to prevent thrombotic complications in peripheral interventions. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of bivalirudin as the anticoagulant agent for peripheral interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 108 patients who underwent 110 peripheral interventions between January 2002 and January 2004 and received bivalirudin as the sole anticoagulation agent was conducted at Baptist Cardiac and Vascular Institute. Interventions were performed in the following areas: iliac, femoropopliteal, and distal (n = 55), carotid (n = 31), vertebral (n = 1), renal (n = 14), aorta (n = 7), and subclavian (n = 2). The following procedural and clinical endpoints were examined: death, requirement of urgent surgery or surgery during the same admission, urgent percutaneous revascularization in the same treated vessel, thrombotic or embolic events, bleeding events, and groin complications.

RESULTS

A total of 266 lesions were dilated in 185 arteries. There were no procedural mortalities, procedural success was 99.1%, and the complication rate was 3.6%. There was one embolic stroke (0.9%), one thrombosis (0.9%), and two groin hematomas (1.8%). No patient required urgent surgery or reintervention in the same treated vessel. No complications were noted at 7 days after the procedure. There were two interventions by postprocedure day 30: toe amputation and groin debridement.

CONCLUSION

Bivalirudin is a safe alternative to unfractionated heparin as the anticoagulation agent in peripheral interventions. This study shows that the complication profile is comparable to other bivalirudin studies. Bivalirudin is effective, easy to use, and is associated with few bleeding complications.

Tiny Solutions for Giant Cardiac Problems

Health care nanotechnology research has "domesticated" molecular and cellular processes to serve our needs. This paper introduces current cardiovascular therapies for nanotechnologists unfamiliar with the field or current developments. Although early in its development, cell-based disease therapy capitalizes on existing biologic systems to implement nanoscale functionality. We propose that the most efficient development pathway for nanomedicine is to merge biomolecular and cellular techniques with the nanotechnology knowledge base.

Direct thrombin inhibitors: pharmacology and clinical relevance

Although heparin has been a cornerstone of treatment for the prevention of thrombosis, it is limited by its adverse effects and unpredictable bioavailability. Direct thrombin inhibitors are a novel class of drugs that have been developed as an effective alternative mode of anticoagulation in patients who suffer from heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia, and for the management of thromboembolic disorders and acute coronary syndromes. The main disadvantages of the direct thrombin inhibitors are the lack of an antidote or readily available clinical monitoring. The mechanism of action, the properties of direct thrombin inhibitors and their potential to replace currently available anticoagulants are reviewed.

Emerging role of direct thrombin inhibitors in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: potential and peril

Ximelagatran, an emerging new direct, oral, fixed-dose thrombin inhibitor may offer an attractive alternate to warfarin for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The lack of drug-to-drug interactions and need for coagulation monitoring parameters such as international normalized ratio and a short half-life make therapeutic control and withdrawal in the event of bleeding easier. The side-effect profile, including elevation of liver enzymes, may temper the clinical utility of long-term use ximelagatran.

Heparin in interventional radiology: a therapy in evolution

Interventional radiology techniques made possible by the antithrombotic properties of heparin have revolutionized treatment for a myriad of disorders. Newer low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) offer several advantages over unfractionated heparin (UFH), especially in chronic settings. They are increasing in popularity for use during vascular procedures. However, LMWH shares limitations with UFH such as heterogeneity, nonspecificity, and induction of thrombocytopenia. These drawbacks have led to a search for the next generation of antithrombotic agents. Homogeneous drugs targeting specific coagulation cascade molecules are now available. The number of alternative anticoagulant drug combinations presents clinicians with a confusing array of choices. The strengths and weaknesses of UFH, LMWH, and direct antithrombin agents are presented. The promising future of LMWH and hirudins is discussed.

Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology

In patients with stable CAD, PCI can be considered a valuable initial mode of revascularization in all patients with objective large ischaemia in the presence of almost every lesion subset, with only one exception: chronic total occlusions that cannot be crossed. In early studies, there was a small survival advantage with CABG surgery compared with PCI without stenting. The addition of stents and newer adjunctive medications improved the outcome for PCI. The decision to recommend PCI or CABG surgery will be guided by technical improvements in cardiology or surgery, local expertise, and patients' preference. However, until proved otherwise, PCI should be used only with reservation in diabetics with multi-vessel disease and in patients with unprotected left main stenosis. The use of drug-eluting stents might change this situation. Patients presenting with NSTE-ACS (UA or NSTEMI) have to be stratified first for their risk of acute thrombotic complications. A clear benefit from early angiography (<48 h) and, when needed, PCI or CABG surgery has been reported only in the high-risk groups. Deferral of intervention does not improve outcome. Routine stenting is recommended on the basis of the predictability of the result and its immediate safety. In patients with STEMI, primary PCI should be the treatment of choice in patients presenting in a hospital with PCI facility and an experienced team. Patients with contra-indications to thrombolysis should be immediately transferred for primary PCI, because this might be their only chance for quickly opening the coronary artery. In cardiogenic shock, emergency PCI for complete revascularization may be life-saving and should be considered at an early stage. Compared with thrombolysis, randomized trials that transferred the patients for primary PCI to a 'heart attack centre' observed a better clinical outcome, despite transport times leading to a significantly longer delay between randomization and start of the treatment. The superiority of primary PCI over thrombolysis seems to be especially clinically relevant for the time interval between 3 and 12 h after onset of chest pain or other symptoms on the basis of its superior preservation of myocardium. Furthermore, with increasing time to presentation, major-adverse-cardiac-event rates increase after thrombolysis, but appear to remain relatively stable after primary PCI. Within the first 3 h after onset of chest pain or other symptoms, both reperfusion strategies seem equally effective in reducing infarct size and mortality. Therefore, thrombolysis is still a viable alternative to primary PCI, if it can be delivered within 3 h after onset of chest pain or other symptoms. Primary PCI compared with thrombolysis significantly reduced stroke. Overall, we prefer primary PCI over thrombolysis in the first 3 h of chest pain to prevent stroke, and in patients presenting 3-12 h after the onset of chest pain, to salvage myocardium and also to prevent stroke. At the moment, there is no evidence to recommend facilitated PCI. Rescue PCI is recommended, if thrombolysis failed within 45-60 min after starting the administration. After successful thrombolysis, the use of routine coronary angiography within 24 h and PCI, if applicable, is recommended even in asymptomatic patients without demonstrable ischaemia to improve patients' outcome. If a PCI centre is not available within 24 h, patients who have received successful thrombolysis with evidence of spontaneous or inducible ischaemia before discharge should be referred to coronary angiography and revascularized accordingly--independent of 'maximal' medical therapy.

Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY (ACUITY) trial: study design and rationale

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS; unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) are at significant risk for death and myocardial infarction. Early angiography followed by revascularization is considered the treatment of choice for moderate- to high-risk patients with ACS. However, despite the integration of newer therapies including stents, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and thienopyridines, the rate of adverse ischemic events still remains unacceptably high, and the intensive pharmacologic regimens used to stabilize the disrupted atherosclerotic plaque and support angioplasty and surgical revascularization procedures elicit a high rate of bleeding complications. Pilot trials suggest that the thrombin-specific anticoagulant bivalirudin may improve clinical outcomes in ACS.

STUDY DESIGN

In the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY (ACUITY) trial, 13,800 patients with moderate- to high-risk ACS are being prospectively randomly assigned at up to 600 centers to unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin + IIb/IIIa inhibition, versus bivalirudin + IIb/IIIa inhibition, versus bivalirudin + provisional IIb/IIIa inhibition. All patients undergo cardiac catheterization within 72 hours, followed by percutaneous or surgical revascularization when appropriate. In a second random assignment, patients assigned to receive IIb/IIIa inhibitors are subrandomized to upstream drug initiation, versus IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration during angioplasty only. The primary study end point is the composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization for ischemia, and major bleeding at 30 days. Clinical follow-up will continue for 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACUITY trial is the largest study yet performed in patients with ACS undergoing an invasive strategy. In addition to evaluating the utility of bivalirudin in ACS, this study will also provide important guidance regarding the necessity for and timing of IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration.