Beneficial hemodynamic effects of intravenous and oral diltiazem in severe congestive heart failure

Safety and Efficacy of Nondihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers for Acute Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation with Rapid Ventricular Response and Comorbid Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

The use of nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (NDCCBs) to achieve rate control in atrial fibrillation with the rapid ventricular rate (AF RVR) is not recommended in patients with comorbid heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) due to the concern for further blunting of contractility. However, these recommendations are extrapolated from data examining chronic NDCCB use in HFrEF patients, and comorbid AF was not analyzed. These recommendations also do not cite the hemodynamic effects or clinical outcomes of NDCCBs for acute rate control in HFrEF patients with AF RVR. It is our goal to open the discussion concerning the hemodynamic effects and safety profile of NDCCBs for acute rate control in this specific patient population. In the acute setting of AF RVR and HFrEF, there is a paucity of low-quality data on the safety and hemodynamic effects of NDCCBs, with mixed results. There has not been a clear signal toward adverse outcomes with NDCCBs, particularly for diltiazem. Data in this scenario is similarly limited for beta blockers, which provide the additional hemodynamic effect of the neurohormonal blockade, which provides a long-term mortality benefit to HFrEF patients. We support the cautious use of beta blockers as first-line therapy in clinical settings where an acute rate control strategy for AF RVR is warranted. We also support diltiazem as a reasonable second-line option, though the relative paucity of data calls for further research to validate this conclusion. Verapamil in this setting should be avoided until more data are available.

Defining the role of calcium channel antagonists in heart failure due to systolic dysfunction

Calcium channel antagonists (CCAs) may either be divided into the dihydropyridines (e.g. amlodipine, felodipine, isradipine, lacidipine, nilvadipine, nifedipine, nicardipine etc.), the phenylalkylamines (e.g. verapamil) and the benzothiazepines (e.g. diltiazem) according to their chemical structure, or into first generation agents (nifedipine, verapamil and diltiazem) and second generation agents (subsequently developed dihydropyridine-derivatives). Second generation CCAs are characterized by greater selectivity for calcium channels in vascular smooth muscle cells than the myocardium, a longer duration of action and a small trough-to-peak variation in plasma concentrations. Heart failure is characterized by decreased cardiac output resulting in inadequate oxygen delivery to peripheral tissues. Although the accompanying neurohormonal activation, leading to vasoconstriction and increased blood pressure, is initially beneficial in increasing tissue perfusion, prolonged activation is detrimental because it increases afterload and further reduces cardiac output. At the level of the myocyte, heart failure is associated with increased intracellular calcium levels which are thought to impair diastolic function. These changes indicate that the CCAs would be beneficial in patients with heart failure. There has been a strong interest and increasing experience in the use of CCAs in patients with heart failure. Despite potential beneficial effects in initial small trials, findings from larger trials suggest that CCA may have detrimental effects upon survival and cardiovascular events. However, this may not necessarily be a 'class b' effect of the CCAs as there is considerable heterogeneity in the chemical structure of individual agents. Clinical experience with different CCAs in patients with heart failure includes trials that evaluated their effects on hemodynamic parameters, exercise tolerance and on symptomatology. However, the most relevant results are those from randomized clinical trials that assessed mortality as the primary endpoint. First generation CCAs have direct negative inotropic effects and even sustained release formulations have not proved any beneficial effect upon survival. With second generation CCAs, some benefit on hemodynamic parameters has been observed but none on survival, alone or in combination with ACE inhibitors. It is noteworthy that although amlodipine had a neutral effect on morbidity and mortality in large, randomized, placebo-controlled trials in patients with heart failure, the drug was well tolerated. There is no specific indication for CCAs (first or second generation) in patients with systolic heart failure, alone or in combination with ACE inhibitors, but amlodipine may be a considered in the management of hypertension or coronary artery disease in patients with heart failure.

New treatments for perioperative cardiac arrhythmias

Cardiac arrhythmias remain a major source of morbidity, mortality, and prolonged postoperative hospital stay in surgical patients. Recent studies in patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have expanded our knowledge in the management of cardiac arrhythmias. Future advances require additional studies focused on the unique proarrhythmic substrates in surgical patients, to provide a clear rationale for antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the perioperative period.

Diltiazem to treat sinus tachycardia in critically ill patients: a four-year experience

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether an intravenous infusion of the calcium channel blocker diltiazem was effective and safe in treating sinus tachycardia in critically ill adult patients with contraindications to beta-blockers or in whom beta-blockers were ineffective.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

University medical center.

PATIENTS

The records of 171 surgical intensive care unit patients with sinus tachycardia treated with intravenous diltiazem were evaluated.

INTERVENTIONS

In all patients with sinus tachycardia (heart rate >100 beats/min), heart rate control with intravenous diltiazem was attempted after adequate intravascular volume expansion, pain, and anxiety control. In all patients, beta-blockade either was contraindicated or (in 7%) had failed. Intravenous diltiazem was administered as a slow 10-mg bolus dose (0.1-0.2 mg/kg ideal body weight), and then an infusion was started at 5 or 10 mg/hr and increased up to 30 mg/hr, as needed, to decrease heart rate to <100 beats/min. Variables retrospectively collected included demographic data, preinfusion blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and preinfusion pressure-rate quotients (pressure-rate quotient = mean arterial pressure / heart rate). Intravenous bolus dose, when given, and diltiazem infusion rate and time necessary to achieve the target heart rate also were recorded. The lowest heart rate recorded within 24 hrs from the initiation of the infusion and the time necessary to achieve the lowest heart rate after beginning the infusion were recorded.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Of 171 patients studied, 97 (56%) were classified as responders. Multiple linear regression suggested that response could be predicted by age, pressure-rate quotients, baseline mean arterial pressure, and central nervous system failure. In the responders, a heart rate <100 beats/min was achieved in an average of 2 hrs, at a mean diltiazem infusion of 13.3 mg/hr. The lowest rate reached by the responders in a 24-hr period averaged 86 beats/min and was achieved in 4.8 hrs with a mean infusion rate of 14.8 mg/hr. Both target and lowest rate values were statistically different from baseline heart rate.

CONCLUSION

Diltiazem was effective in achieving short-term control of heart rate in 56% of the patients, virtually without adverse effects, where beta-blockade was contraindicated or ineffective.

Treatment of Perioperative Myocardial Ischemia

Prevention and treatment of myocardial ischemia re mains a central focus of perioperative care. Myocardial ischemia is best understood in terms of myocardial oxygen supply and demand ratios. Conventional ther apy includes nitrates, β-blockers, and calcium channel blockers. In all 3 drug classes, ischemia is reduced by either improving supply, decreasing demand, or both. More recent investigation evaluates these medications either as prophylactic therapy or as a component of long-term risk reduction for cardiac morbid events. Newer therapies, including anticoagulation, pain ther apy, normothermia, central neuroaxial techniques, and other therapies, are reviewed.

Calcium channel blockers in cardiac failure

Congestive cardiac failure is an increasingly prevalent syndrome associated with a high morbidity and mortality. The role of calcium channel blockers in the treatment of heart failure is unclear. The potential benefits of these agents derive not only from their vasodilator properties, but also from anti-ischemic effects, beneficial effects on endothelial function and the development of atherosclerosis, and favorable effects on calcium cycling at a molecular level. Pitted against this array of potential benefits are direct negative inotropic effects and the potential for neuroendocrine activation. Treatment with short-acting dihydropyridine agents has not resulted in long-term clinical benefits in patients with cardiac failure. Diltiazem may be beneficial in patients with nonischemic heart failure, and verapamil has a neutral effect in cardiac failure, although it may have a role in combination with ace inhibition. To date, amlodipine has been associated with the most promising results, with evidence of a mortality benefit in nonischemic heart failure. Mibefradil is of no benefit in the management of heart failure, although the trend toward increased mortality in the treatment arm of the Mortality Assessment in Congestive Heart Failure (MACH)-1 trial may have been due to drug interactions. The potential role of calcium blockers in diastolic dysfunction and in combination with ace-inhibition requires further study.

Postoperative Cardiac Arrhythmias: Prevention and Management

Supraventricular arrhythmias or supraventricular tachy cardias (SVT) frequently occur after thoracic surgery and have been associated with prolonged hospital stays. The reported incidence of supraventricular ar rhythmias in this patient population ranges from 9% to 40%, with factors such as extent of surgery markedly influencing the incidence. SVT has been reported to be 12% to 16% after lobectomy, 20% to 30% after pneumo nectomy, and as much as 40% after extrapleural pneu monectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Pa tients who develop SVT have a higher rate of intensive care unit admission and higher 30-day mortality. SVT occurrence appears to be an important marker of poor cardiopulmonary reserve in patients who developed significant morbidity after thoracic surgery. It is pos sible that the rate of SVT occurrence increases propor tionally with extent of neural trauma to cardiac plexus structures in older patients. The timing of SVT onset is likely related to the high adrenergic activity of the postsurgery state and the resolution of a graded inflam matory process corresponding to the amount of blunt or sharp surgical trauma to sympathovagal nerve fibers innervating the sinus node. This article will focus on new issues leading to improved understanding of the pathophysiology and mechanisms of SVT after surgery. New approaches directed at prophylaxis and acute therapy of SVT are also discussed.

Comparison of the therapeutic effects of the beta-blocking agent bisoprolol and the calcium-blocking agent diltiazem in patients with heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy

Beta-blocking agents reduce mortality and improve symptoms in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). There have been reports that diltiazem, a calcium-blocking agent, is also effective in such patients. We prospectively compared the effects of the beta-blocking agent bisoprolol with those of the calcium-blocking agent diltiazem in 18 patients (11 males and 7 females, age 14 to 68) with DCM. The 18 patients, (10 in New York Heart Association functional class III and 8 in class IV) were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Bisoprolol was administered as the first drug in 10 patients and diltiazem was administered in 8. Cross-over to bisoprolol was also performed in 3 patients. At the end of the study, among the 13 patients who had been given bisoprolol, 9 showed a good response (efficacy rate: 69%). In contrast, only 3 of the 8 patients who received diltiazem showed a good response (efficacy rate: 37.5%). Among the patients in NYHA class III, all 7 (100%) who were treated with bisoprolol responded but only 2 of the 4 (50%) treated with diltiazem responded (p < 0.05). Among the patients in class IV, 2 of 6 (33%) responded to bisoprolol and 1 of 4 (25%) responded to diltiazem (not significant). These results suggest that diltiazem, like bisoprolol, has a beneficial effect in patients with DCM, with a greater effect in class III patients. However, we conclude that diltiazem should usually be used as a second choice to improve heart failure in DCM, and as the first medication only in those with contraindications to beta-blocking agents.

Intravenous diltiazem for the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter and moderate to severe congestive heart failure

The objective of this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to determine the safety and efficacy of intravenous diltiazem in the treatment of 37 patients with rapid (ventricular rate, mean +/- SD 142 +/- 17 beats/min) atrial fibrillation or flutter and moderate to severe congestive heart failure (ejection fraction, mean +/- SD 36 +/- 14%; New York Heart Association class III [23 patients], class IV [14 patients]). During the double-blind portion of the study, patients received either intravenous diltiazem, 0.25 mg/kg over 2 minutes, or placebo followed 15 minutes later by diltiazem or placebo, 0.35 mg/kg over 2 minutes, if the first dose was tolerated but ineffective. Placebo nonresponders were given open-label intravenous diltiazem in a similar fashion as in the double-blind portion of the study. In the double-blind part of the study, 21 (18 with 0.25 mg/kg, 3 with an additional 0.35 mg/kg) of the 22 patients (95%) responded to diltiazem, and 0 of 15 patients (0%) responded to placebo (p < 0.001). All 15 patients (13 with 0.25 mg/kg and 2 with an additional 0.35 mg/kg) who received placebo during the double-blind period had a therapeutic response to diltiazem during open-label therapy. Overall, 36 of 37 patients (97%) had a therapeutic response to intravenous diltiazem. Heart rate response to diltiazem after the 2-minute bolus infusions consisted of a > or = 20% decrease in heart rate from baseline in 36 patients; in addition, 17 patients also had heart rates decreased to < 100 beats/min, whereas no patient had conversion to sinus rhythm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hemodynamic tolerability and anti-ischemic efficacy of high dose intravenous diltiazem in patients with normal versus impaired ventricular function

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to compare the acute systemic and coronary hemodynamic effects of high doses of intravenous diltiazem in patients with normal versus impaired left ventricular function, investigate the safety of this drug and compare its anti-ischemic potential in these two patient groups during pacing-induced stress.

BACKGROUND

Because coronary hemodynamic effects and negative inotropic properties of diltiazem are dose related, high dose intravenous diltiazem may improve anti-ischemic efficacy but may not be tolerated in patients with impaired cardiac function.

METHODS

High dose intravenous diltiazem, 0.4 mg/kg for 5 min followed by 0.4 mg/kg for 10 min, was administered to 23 normotensive patients with coronary artery disease, 11 (group A) with normal and 12 (group B) with impaired ventricular function (ejection fraction < 45%) during two identical arterial pacing stress tests performed 30 min before (pacing test I) and immediately after diltiazem (pacing test II).

RESULTS

Diltiazem was well tolerated despite high peak plasma levels, 869 +/- 152 micrograms/liter (group A) and 926 +/- 169 micrograms/liter (group B). It resulted in immediate but similar reductions in systemic resistance from 1,321 +/- 136 (control value) to 963 +/- 113 dynes.s.cm-5 (group A) and from 1,267 +/- 106 to 865 +/- 58 dynes.s.cm-5 (group B) and in mean arterial pressure from 107 +/- 3 to 93 +/- 4 mm Hg (group A) and from 103 +/- 4 to 86 +/- 4 mm Hg (group B), at 5 min after diltiazem (all p < 0.05 vs. control value). Diltiazem improved stroke output from 36 +/- 3 (control value) to 46 +/- 4 ml/beat per m2 in group B and from 44 +/- 4 (control value) to 49 +/- 5 ml/beat per m2 in group A, an effect that was significantly greater and more prolonged in group B than in group A. Although neither heart rate nor contractility was affected in either group, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure increased in group A (9 +/- 2 mm Hg to 12 +/- 1 mm Hg, p < 0.05) but not in group B. Despite similar reductions in coronary resistance and improvements in coronary flow, diltiazem consistently reduced myocardial oxygen extraction, but only in group B. Also, the anti-ischemic effects of diltiazem were more pronounced in group B. During pacing test II, myocardial lactate extraction normalized in group B (7 +/- 5% vs. -6 +/- 12% [pacing test I]) but not in group A, contractility indexes improved more and the increase in left ventricular filling pressure was reduced to a greater extent in group B. Moreover, the ischemia-induced increase in arterial pressures, observed in both groups during pacing test I, was prevented in group B but recurred in group A during pacing test II.

CONCLUSIONS

High dose intravenous diltiazem is well tolerated, augments coronary flow and improves left ventricular pump function, particularly in patients with preexisting ventricular dysfunction. As its anti-ischemic effects also appear more pronounced in the latter group, high dose diltiazem may be particularly useful when ventricular function is depressed, for example, during prolonged ischemia at rest.

Use of intravenous diltiazem in patients with acute coronary artery disease

The use of calcium antagonists for the treatment of patients with unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction has been a promising area of both basic and clinical research. Despite consistently beneficial effects experimentally, the clinical extrapolation of these results has been less than ideal, especially in patients with evolving myocardial infarction. Calcium antagonists have in some instances failed to manifest benefit and at times have been shown to have negative effects. One reason for this could be the use of oral or sublingual preparations, which result in variable absorption, variable volumes of distribution, and variable clearance. For this reason, an intravenous preparation of one of the calcium antagonists, diltiazem, may be more beneficial. Such a preparation has been developed and its safety confirmed in patients without cardiovascular disease and in patients with acute infarction. Substantial benefit has been documented in patients with stable angina and during noncardiac surgery. Preliminary data in patients with unstable angina suggest that the drug is effective, although studies comparing intravenous diltiazem with other agents or with the oral preparation of diltiazem have not yet been reported. Experimental data in animals with acute infarction have demonstrated that administration of intravenous diltiazem after occlusion, but prior to reperfusion, elicits a marked increase in the degree of myocardial salvage induced by thrombolysis. This appears to be due to the inhibition of lipid peroxidation rather than alterations in coronary perfusion. Thus, it appears that the intravenous preparation may permit the more effective use of diltiazem in patients with acute coronary artery disease.

The pharmacologic treatment of atrial fibrillation

The pharmacologic treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is aimed at controlling the ventricular response, restoring sinus rhythm, and preventing or delaying relapses. In the control of ventricular response, digitalis maintains a primary role when the arrhythmia is accompanied by heart failure. In ischemic, hypertensive, and degenerative (whose number is increasing at present) cardiopathies without evident ventricular dilatation, treatments with calcium antagonists (such as verapamil, gallopamil, or diltiazem) or beta-blocking agents must be preferred. In order to control the ventricular response in patients with chronic AF during physical activity, the association of digitalis with beta-blocking agents or calcium antagonists seems to provide satisfactory results. The drugs of the IC class, especially flecainide, represent a certain therapeutical progress in the restoration of sinus rhythm in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation affecting subjects without evident alterations of ventricular function, particularly in subjects with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, with forms of vagal origin, or with atrial fibrillation alone. A therapeutic combination of digitalis and quinidine may produce resolution of the arrhythmia in the presence of altered ventricular function or when AF is of an uncertain onset. In patients with hypertensive, ischemic, and/or degenerative cardiopathy without evident ventricular or advanced heart failure, the verapamil-quinidine association may also be effective and even quicker. The combination of drugs of the I and III class for restoration of the sinus rhythm in particularly resistant forms of AF without evident structural heart alterations is promising but must be verified in a greater number of patients. In the prevention of relapses amiodarone appears to have the widest spectrum of advantages from an electrophysiologic point of view; however, because of its many side effects, amiodarone represents a late therapeutical choice. The promising results obtained with flecainide are disputed by the results of the CAST, which limit the possibilities of using this drug to a low number of cases (W.P.W. syndrome, AF of vagal origin, atrial fibrillation alone). In the past, quinidine and disopyramide have been the drugs most widely used in the prophylaxis of AF. These drugs have a similar efficacy, and both of them provided some positive results. However, because of untoward side effects (especially for quinidine) during chronic treatment, the use of these drugs has been questioned. Perhaps in the majority of patients, the less dangerous therapeutic choice after the termination of the fibrillation is a combination of drugs slowly down AV node activity (digitalis or calcium antagonists and beta blockers) with class IA antiarrhythmics.

Different negative inotropic activity of Ca2(+)-antagonists in human myocardial tissue

To evaluate the negative inotropic effect of various Ca2(+)-antagonists in human myocardium without additional influences of preload, afterload, or frequency, we examined their effects on isometric force of contraction in isolated human papillary muscle strips and in auricular trabeculae. The 1,4-dihydropyridines isradipine, nitrendipine, and nifedipine, the phenylalkylamine verapamil, and the benzothiazepine diltiazem exerted concentration-dependent negative inotropic effects. The potency of the investigated Ca2(+)-antagonists was identical in papillary muscle strips of patients with only moderate clinical signs of heart failure undergoing mitral valve replacement-operation (NYHA II-III) and in terminally failing (heart transplantation, NYHA IV) human hearts. The IC50 values were lower in auricular trabeculae than in papillary muscle strips. The difference was significant for nifedipine, nitrendipine, and verapamil. The restorative effects of external Ca2+ after pretreatment with Ca2(+)-antagonists were significantly less strong after pretreatment with 1,4-dihydropyridine than with non-dihydropyridines in papillary muscle strips. It is concluded that 1,4-dihydropyridines and verapamil and diltiazem did differently influence Ca2(+)-mediated increase in force of contraction. Moreover, a relation between the therapeutically active free plasma concentration in vivo and the negative inotropic potency in vitro can be found. This relation follows a rank order of potency for negative inotropism (isradipine less than or equal to nitrendipine less than diltiazem less than nifedipine less than verapamil) and might have clinical relevance in the treatment of patients with compromised cardiac function.

Stable angina pectoris: 3. Medical treatment

The therapeutic goals for the patient with angina pectoris are to minimize the frequency and severity of angina and to improve functional capacity at a reasonable cost and with as few side effects as possible. An integrated approach necessitates attention to conditions that might be aggravating angina, such as anemia or hypertension. Alterations in life-style and personal habits, such as cessation of cigarette smoking, are often necessary and should be continually reinforced by the physician. Certain concomitant diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, may influence the selection of drug therapy. Nitrates, beta-adrenergic blockers, and calcium entry blockers are the major classes of drugs that can be used alone or in combination in a program that is designed for the individual patient.

Mild heart failure: diagnosis and treatment

CHF afflicts 15 million persons worldwide despite advances made in its diagnosis and treatment. A thorough physical examination and basic, noninvasive evaluation are essential for establishing the diagnosis of heart failure and for designing an optimal, individualized treatment regimen. Although digitalis and diuretics continue to be used commonly for the treatment of CHF of all severities, the use of vasodilators and ACE inhibitors has increased dramatically, as they are used more widely and earlier in the course of the illness. Because the RAA system contributes significantly to the altered cardiovascular hemodynamics and symptomatology characteristic of heart failure, the ACE inhibitors provide a rational approach to therapy for many patients. Results of controlled clinical trials have shown that selected vasodilators and ACE inhibitors can improve survival in patients with CHF and that patients receiving ACE inhibitors show sustained improvement in clinical class, exercise tolerance, and hemodynamics. Thus the therapeutic spectrum available to the clinician dealing with patients with CHF has broadened substantively over the past decade.

Inotropic effect of nicardipine in patients with heart failure: assessment by left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume analysis

Nicardipine, a new dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, has been investigated for the treatment of coronary artery disease and heart failure. To assess the inotropic effect of nicardipine in humans independent of its vasodilator effect, equihypotensive doses of intravenous nitroprusside (mean infusion rate 65 +/- 13 micrograms/min) and nicardipine (mean dose 5.2 +/- 0.4 mg) were administered to 15 patients with heart failure (New York Heart Association functional classes II to IV, radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction 0.15 +/- 0.02). Left ventricular micromanometer pressure and simultaneous radionuclide left ventricular volume were obtained at baseline, during nitroprusside infusion, during a second baseline period and during nicardipine infusion. Heart rate did not change significantly with either nitroprusside or nicardipine. Mean systemic arterial pressure decreased by an average of 21 mm Hg with both drugs. A greater decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure occurred with nitroprusside (27 +/- 2 to 14 +/- 2 mm Hg, p less than 0.01) than with nicardipine (27 +/- 2 to 23 +/- 3 mm Hg, p less than 0.05), and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decreased significantly only with nitroprusside. Cardiac index increased from 1.8 +/- 0.1 to 2.1 +/- 0.1 liters/min per m2 (p less than 0.05) with nitroprusside and to a greater extent from 1.7 +/- 0.1 to 2.4 +/- 0.1 liters/min per m2 (p less than 0.01) with nicardipine. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased with nicardipine (0.15 +/- 0.01 to 0.19 +/- 0.01, p less than 0.01), but not with nitroprusside. Peak positive first derivative of left ventricular pressure (dP/dt) decreased by 9% with both agents.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Diltiazem attenuates the inotropic and peripheral vascular effects of cardiac glycosides

The influence of diltiazem on the hemodynamic effects of ouabain in 10 preinstrumented awake dogs was studied. Mean aortic pressure increased from 102 to 119 mm Hg with ouabain (p less than 0.05), an effect that was attenuated by pretreatment with diltiazem. The increase in systemic vascular resistance of 30% with ouabain was ablated by prior diltiazem. Heart rate did not significantly change with ouabain or with diltiazem plus ouabain, but intravenous diltiazem alone produced a reflex increase in heart rate of 26%. Left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic dimension was significantly greater with ouabain alone, but not with ouabain after pretreatment with diltiazem. LV dP/dt max increased by 40% with ouabain alone, but by only 23% (p less than 0.001) after pretreatment with diltiazem plus ouabain. When observed at matched preload and heart rate, diltiazem markedly attenuates the positive inotropic and peripheral arterial constrictive effects of acute ouabain administration in the conscious animal with normal LV function.

The effects of diltiazem on cardiac function in silent ischemia after myocardial infarction

In a total group of 56 patients with an acute myocardial infarction who were maximally exercised at predischarge, 20 patients (36%) showed greater than or equal to 1 mm asymptomatic ST-T segment depression during exercise. The site of the infarction was anterior in 12 patients and inferior in eight patients. All 20 patients underwent repeated exercise radionuclide angiography 2 days later, 2 hours following oral intake of 120 mg of diltiazem. Double product was not significantly different before and after diltiazem, both at rest and during exercise. Maximal ST-T depression after diltiazem was reduced from 2.3 +/- 0.8 to 0.7 +/- 0.6 mm (p less than 0.01). Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction at rest before diltiazem was 54.4 +/- 8.7% and after diltiazem was 56.2 +/- 11.3% (p = NS). During exercise, LV ejection fraction improved after diltiazem from 43.2 +/- 12.2% to 49.8 +/- 10.5% (p less than 0.05). Regional wall motion score (1 = normal, 2 = hypokinetic, 3 = akinetic, 4 = dyskinetic) at rest before diltiazem was 9.6 +/- 2.0 and after diltiazem was 9.1 +/- 1.8 (p = NS). During exercise, regional wall motion score improved after diltiazem from 5.8 +/- 1.3 to 4.3 +/- 1.1 (p less than 0.02). We conclude that silent ischemia occurs in a substantial number of patients after myocardial infarction and that diltiazem has acute beneficial effects on asymptomatic ST-T depression and on global and regional LV function in post-infarction patients with silent ischemia.

Vasodilator therapy without converting-enzyme inhibition in congestive heart failure--usefulness and limitations

Despite a well-established rationale for pharmacologically induced arterial and venous vasodilatation in congestive heart failure, the clinical usefulness of long-term vasodilator therapy without concomitant converting-enzyme inhibition generally has been disappointing. With the exception of nitrates and, possibly, the combination of nitrates and hydralazine, the use of converting-enzyme inhibitors in many aspects appears preferable in the majority of patients. This article reviews the pathophysiology of inappropriate vasoconstriction in heart failure, the cellular mode of action of the various vasodilators, hemodynamic effects with respect to the peripheral site of action, clinical usefulness and limitations of different vasodilators, and the various determinants of clinical efficacy. Finally, an attempt is made to assess when and how to introduce vasodilator treatment with and without concomitant ACE inhibition.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous diltiazem for treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. The Diltiazem-Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Study Group

This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of intravenous diltiazem for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. A double-blind, parallel, randomized, placebo-controlled protocol was used, and 6 large, urban hospitals, both university-affiliated and private, participated. The study involved 113 patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter, a ventricular rate greater than or equal to 120 beats/min and systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg without severe heart failure. The dose of intravenous diltiazem (or identical placebo) was 0.25 mg/kg/2 minutes followed 15 minutes later by 0.35 mg/kg/2 minutes if the first dose was tolerated but ineffective. If a patient did not respond, the code was broken and the patient was allowed to receive open-label diltiazem if placebo had been given. Of 56 patients, 42 (75%) randomized to receive diltiazem responded to 0.25 mg/kg and 10 of 14 responded to 0.35 mg/kg, for a total response rate of 52 of 56 patients (93%), whereas 7 of 57 patients (12%) responded to placebo (p less than 0.001). After the double-blind protocol, 49 of the 57 patients who received placebo were then given diltiazem; 47 of 49 responded, for an overall response rate of 99 of 105 patients (94%) with diltiazem. The median time from the start of drug infusion to the maximal decrease in heart rate was 4.3 minutes. Side effects occurred in 14 patients, 7 of whom had asymptomatic hypotension not requiring intervention. Thus, intravenous diltiazem was rapidly effective for slowing the ventricular response in most patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Blood pressure decreased slightly. Side effects were mild.

Calcium antagonists and heart failure

The systemic vasodilatory actions of the calcium antagonists make them potentially attractive for use as afterload reducing agents in patients with left ventricular failure. However, unlike other vasodilator drugs, these drugs also exert a direct negative inotropic effect on the myocardium. Clinical data suggest a limited role for the calcium antagonists as vasodilator therapy in patients with heart failure.

Beneficial effects of long-term diltiazem treatment in dilated cardiomyopathy

There is increasing evidence that chronic enhanced exogenous or endogenous catecholamine stimulation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy may worsen hemodynamic status and prognosis. The cause of this deterioration may lie in myocellular calcium accumulation and microcirculatory disorders. In a prospective study, the calcium channel antagonist diltiazem was given to 22 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (60 to 90 mg three times daily) in addition to conventional therapy of digitalis, diuretics and vasodilators. Twenty-five patients received the conventional therapy and served as historical controls. Eight additional patients who were not originally included in this control group received adjunctive diltiazem treatment after initially receiving conventional therapy alone. The three patient groups were similar in all hemodynamic and anamnestic features. Only patients with reduced myofibrillar volume fraction on myocardial biopsy were included in the trial, because they could be expected to show hemodynamic deterioration. The mean survival time was 29 months in the control group, whereas no patient in the diltiazem group died over a mean follow-up period of 15.4 months (p less than 0.001). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 0.34 to 0.44 (p less than 0.001) and New York Heart Association functional class improved significantly in the diltiazem group and during the diltiazem period in the crossover patients, but deteriorated in the control group. The results suggest that adjunctive diltiazem treatment in dilated cardiomyopathy has beneficial effects on mortality, hemodynamics and symptoms.

Clinical and hemodynamic effects of long-term administration of gallopamil in patients with coronary artery disease and normal or impaired left ventricular function

The hemodynamic and clinical profiles of gallopamil, a new calcium antagonist, were evaluated in 20 patients with severe coronary artery disease in a placebo-controlled, single-blind study. The patients were divided into 2 groups depending on baseline ejection fraction (greater than 45 or less than or equal to 45%) and underwent nuclear ventriculography, both at rest and during bicycle exercise under electrocardiographic monitoring, after 3 weeks of therapy (50 mg 3 times daily) and the 1-week run in and washout placebo periods. The mean anginal weekly frequency per patient was significantly reduced, from 3.4 to 0.5 (p less than 0.001). The left ventricular ejection fraction, cardiac volumes, ejection and filling indexes at rest and for the same workload were not altered in the population as a whole or in each of the 2 groups. The rate pressure product during exercise was reduced for the same workload from 18.0 +/- 5.0 X 10(3) to 16.8 +/- 4.7 X 10(3), while the regional ejection fraction in ischemic regions was not significantly changed. Individual variations of ventriculographic parameters in both groups were not related to basal values. Gallopamil increased the total duration of exercise from 432 +/- 201 to 537 +/- 188 s (p less than 0.001). Six patients did not complain of angina and their exercise was interrupted because of muscular weakness. The hemodynamic and clinical responses did not differ when the results in the population as a whole and in each of the 2 groups were compared. Gallopamil was effective and well tolerated, even in patients with very depressed cardiac function.

Vasodilator and inotropic drugs for the treatment of chronic heart failure: distinguishing hype from hope

During the past 10 years, more than 80 orally active vasodilator and inotropic agents have been tested in the clinical setting to evaluate their potential utility in the treatment of chronic heart failure. Although the initial reports of all of these drugs suggested that each represented a major therapeutic advance, only three agents--digoxin, captopril and enalapril--have produced consistent long-term hemodynamic and clinical benefits in these severely ill patients. Most of the other drugs that have been tested have not (to date) distinguished themselves from placebo therapy in large-scale, controlled trials, even though these agents produce hemodynamic effects that closely resemble those seen with digitalis and the converting-enzyme inhibitors. These observations suggest that the hemodynamic derangements that characteristically accompany the development of left ventricular dysfunction cannot be considered to be the most important pathophysiologic abnormality in chronic heart failure. Although cardiac contractility is usually depressed in this disease, positive inotropic agents do not consistently improve the clinical status of these patients. Similarly, although the systemic vessels are usually markedly constricted, drugs that ameliorate this vasoconstriction do not consistently relieve symptoms, enhance exercise capacity or prolong life. Hence, correction of the central hemodynamic abnormalities seen in heart failure may not necessarily provide a rational basis for drug development, and future advances in therapy are likely to evolve only by attempting to understand and modify the basic physiologic derangements in this disorder.

Low- and medium-dose diltiazem in chronic atrial fibrillation: comparison with digoxin and correlation with drug plasma levels

The safety and efficacy of diltiazem were compared with digoxin maintenance therapy for control of ventricular response in 19 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. The relationship between drug plasma levels and cardiovascular effects was also investigated. After 7 days of combined therapy with diltiazem (60 mg three times a day in 10 patients and four times a day in nine patients) and digoxin (0.125 mg/day in two patients and 0.250 mg/day in 17 patients), the 24-hour mean heart rate derived from ambulatory ECG recording was reduced by 16.3% in comparison with digoxin therapy alone; the serum digoxin level was not significantly changed (1.06 +/- 0.43 vs 1.05 +/- 0.61 ng/ml). After a standardized bicycle exercise test (50 watts for 3 minutes), maximal heart rate was reduced by 19.9%, diastolic blood pressure was decreased by 8.9%, and systolic pressure-rate product was decreased by 12.5%. Diltiazem plasma levels (mean 120.9 +/- 63.3 ng/ml) were linearly correlated with percentage variations in maximal heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, and pressure-rate product during exercise. Eighteen patients in succession discontinued digoxin therapy; after 14 days of diltiazem alone, the 24-hour mean heart rate returned to control values of digoxin therapy, whereas maximal heart rate and pressure-rate product during exercise were significantly reduced (-17.2% and -14.1%, respectively), with no changes in blood pressure. Diltiazem plasma levels (135.0 +/- 83.2 ng/ml) showed a linear correlation with the percentage of reduction in maximal heart rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Calcium channel antagonists. Part III: Use and comparative efficacy in hypertension and supraventricular arrhythmias. Minor indications

The major antihypertensive mechanism of calcium antagonists is by decreasing the systemic vascular resistance, modified by the counter-regulatory responses of the baroreflexes and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. In severe hypertension, the concept that calcium overload of the vascular myocyte could precipitate or aggravate peripheral vasoconstriction provides a logical basis for the use of these agents as first choice therapy; nifedipine, especially, has been well tested. As monotherapy for mild to moderate hypertension each of the three first-generation agents compares well with beta-blockers. Calcium antagonists may have a special role in the therapy of certain patient groups (elderly, black) or in those subjects whose life style involves intense physical or mental exertion (hemodynamics better maintained than with beta-blockade) or in patients with early end-organ damage such as left ventricular hypertrophy or renal insufficiency. However, the goal blood pressure may not be reached during monotherapy so that drug combinations may be required. Further indications for these compounds are as follows. Verapamil and diltiazem are frequently used in supraventricular tachycardias including acute and chronic atrial fibrillation. In the arrhythmias of the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, there is the potential danger of provocation of anterograde conduction. Further indications for calcium antagonists, still under evaluation, include congestive heart failure (controversial), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (verapamil), primary pulmonary hypertension (high doses required), Raynaud's phenomenon (nifedipine and diltiazem effective), peripheral vascular disease (proof not yet documented), cerebral insufficiency and subarachnoid hemorrhage (nimodipine promising), migraine, exertional bronchospasm, renal disease, atherosclerosis (experimental), and primary aldosteronism (nifedipine inhibits aldosterone release). Second-generation agents include dihydropyridines, such as nitrendipine, nicardipine, felodipine, amlodipine, nisoldipine, nimodipine, and isradipine. From these will be selected agents that are longer acting and provide higher vascular selectivity. New preparations of existing agents include slow-release formulations of nifedipine, verapamil, and diltiazem. Minor side effects include those caused by vasodilation (flushing and headaches), constipation (verapamil), and ankle edema. Serious side effects are rare and result from improper use of these agents, as when intravenous verapamil is given to patients with sinus or atrioventricular nodal depression from drugs or disease, or nifedipine to patients with aortic stenosis. The potential of a marked negative inotropic effect is usually offset by afterload reduction, especially in the case of nifedipine. Yet caution is required when calcium antagonists, especially verapamil, are given to patients with myocardial failure unless caused by hypertensive heart disease. Drug interactions of calcium antagonists occur with other cardiovascular agents such as alpha-adrenergic blockers, beta-adrenergic blockers, digoxin, quinidine, and disopyramide.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Calcium channel blockers

The calcium channel blockers initially were approved for the treatment of classical and variant angina pectoris. Recent studies indicate that these agents also are useful in such diverse conditions as pulmonary and systemic hypertension, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmias, asthma, Raynaud's syndrome, esophageal spasm, myometrial hyperactivity, cerebral arterial spasm, and migraine.

Efficacy, electrocardiographic and renal effects of intravenous diltiazem for essential hypertension

The acute systemic blood pressure, electrocardiographic and renal function responses to an intravenous bolus infusion of diltiazem (0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg) were evaluated in 18 subjects with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Although a significant blood pressure response occurred within 5 minutes, blood pressure returned to pretreatment levels within 1 to 3 hours. After drug infusion, a variety of rhythm and conduction disturbances were noted; the most important were transient prolongation of the PR Interval (first-degree atrioventricular block), a single episode of second-degree atrioventricular block (Mobitz I) associated with T-wave inversion and a transient episode of junctional escape rhythm and atrioventricular dissociation. Intravenous diltiazem had no consistent effect on glomerular filtration rate or effective renal plasma flow. Natriuresis and kaliuresis were observed only at the highest infusion dose. It is concluded that an alternative dosing regimen will be required if intravenous diltiazem is to be used safely and effectively to control blood pressure in patients with hypertensive disease.

Diltiazem treatment for the management of ischaemia in patients with poor left ventricular function: safety of long term administration

The tendency of oral diltiazem (a calcium entry blocking agent and a negative inotrope) to induce or exacerbate congestive heart failure when used for the long term management of myocardial ischaemia in patients with poor left ventricular function has not been investigated before. Twenty two patients (aged 42-73 years) with pretreatment left ventricular ejection fraction ranging from 0.11 to 0.39 were given open label oral diltiazem (120-360 mg/24 h (mean 254 mg)) for two weeks to 16 months (mean 7.5 months, median 6.2 months). There was a weight change of greater than 3 lb (1.35 kg) in nine patients--five gained weight and four lost it. Diltiazem treatment did not alter the mean (SD) cardiothoracic ratio on chest x ray (0.47 (0.06) before vs 0.48 (0.05) after) or the left ventricular ejection fraction at rest (0.28 (0.09) before vs 0.26 (0.08) after). Diltiazem was discontinued in one patient because of symptoms indicative of worsening congestive heart failure. No patient required admission to hospital for treatment of symptoms resulting from further left ventricular decompensation. Diltiazem was discontinued in six other patients for other reasons. Long term administration of oral diltiazem was not regularly associated with a deterioration in clinical, radiographic, or radionuclide ventriculographic estimates of left ventricular function, even in patients with poor baseline left ventricular systolic performance.

Effects on hemodynamics and left ventricular ejection fraction of intravenous bepridil for impaired left ventricular function secondary to coronary artery disease

To define the hemodynamic effects of bepridil in patients with depressed left ventricular (LV) function, 22 patients with an LV ejection fraction (EF) of 0.45 or less were studied before and after 2 mg/kg (n = 11) and 4 mg/kg (n = 11) of intravenous bepridil. Maximal hemodynamic effects were evident between 15 and 30 minutes after drug infusion. After 2 mg/kg, heart rate decreased 9% (p less than 0.01), cardiac index 17% (p less than 0.01), LV dP/dt max 16% (p less than 0.01), stroke work index 14% (p less than 0.01) and mean aortic pressure 8% (difference not significant). Right atrial pressure increased 8% (not significant), pulmonary arterial wedge pressure 24% (p less than 0.01) and systemic vascular resistance 17% (p less than 0.01). After administering 4 mg/kg of bepridil the changes in heart rate, cardiac index, right atrial pressure, LV dP/dt max, mean aortic pressure and systemic vascular resistance were almost identical to those after the smaller dose. The larger dose produced a 40% (p less than 0.01) increase in pulmonary arterial wedge pressure and a 22% decrease in stroke work index (p less than 0.01), but only the change in wedge pressure was significantly greater (p less than 0.01) than that produced by the lower dose. Radionuclide-determined LVEF decreased 6% (p less than 0.05), from 0.33 +/- 0.14 after 2 mg/kg and 11% (p less than 0.05) from 0.27 +/- 0.11 after 4 mg/kg of bepridil. The data indicate that bepridil exerts significant negative inotropic and chronotropic effects in patients with impaired LV function.

Systemic and coronary hemodynamic effects of combined intravenous diltiazem and nitroglycerin administration

This study evaluated left ventricular (LV) and coronary hemodynamic effects of intravenous nitroglycerin (NTG) in the presence of an intravenous infusion of diltiazem in 15 patients with severe coronary disease. Diltiazem (250 microgram/kg bolus followed by 1.4 micrograms/kg/min infusion) alone decreased mean systemic blood pressure (mean 6%) without changing heart rate or LV end-diastolic pressure. The rate of rise in LV pressure declined slightly (4%), and peripheral resistance decreased (19%). Coronary sinus (CS) and great cardiac vein (GCV) flows were preserved. Addition of NTG (average, 68 micrograms/min) decreased systemic pressure further (7%) as LV end-diastolic pressure declined (5 mm Hg). These pressure changes were accompanied by a 10% increase in heart rate (compared with the heart rate found with diltiazem alone). Peripheral resistance was similar to values after diltiazem alone. The CS and GCV flows did not decrease. The sequence of intravenous drug administration was reversed in three other patients with combination therapy, producing similar effects, regardless of which drug was administered first. Hemodynamic effects of intravenous diltiazem alone and its combination with intravenous NTG seemed potentially favorable for patients with ischemic heart disease.

Calcium channel blockers and cardiac surgery

Calcium channel blockers have an important role in the pharmacotherapy of cardiovascular disorders. These agents act by inhibiting the slow inward current into excitable cells, exert direct negative inotropic, chronotropic, and dromotropic activity, and are potent vasodilators. These direct effects are modified by reflex autonomic stimulation and by pathologic states. Serious adverse effects of the calcium channel blockers are most frequently observed in patients with ventricular dysfunction, conduction system disease, or concomitant beta blockade. Calcium channel blockers are indicated in the treatment of angina pectoris, supraventricular arrhythmias, and hypertension. The use of these agents in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, and pulmonary hypertension is investigational. The calcium channel blockers are gaining increased importance in the management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Verapamil is indicated for the treatment of post-cardiac-surgical atrial flutter and fibrillation; however, the calcium antagonists are not effective as prophylaxis against postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias. Laboratory studies have shown that drug interactions exist between calcium channel blockers and inhalational anesthetics and nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents; clinical studies have demonstrated that these interactions are rarely significant. Perioperative coronary spasm can be effectively treated with the calcium channel blockers. The timing of calcium antagonist withdrawal prior to surgery is controversial, but continuation of therapy until surgery is usually safe. The clinical significance of platelet function inhibition by the calcium antagonists is unknown. Protection of ischemic myocardium by calcium channel blockers has been demonstrated. Important interactions between the calcium antagonists, hypothermia, and the ionic constituents of cardioplegia require further study before the role of these agents as adjuncts to clinical cardioplegia is defined. Expanded indications and the introduction of new calcium channel blockers will result in increased use of these agents in the future.

Pharmacotherapy of congestive heart failure. An evaluation of recent advances

Vasodilator therapy represents an important step forward in the treatment of chronic left ventricular failure. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors appear to be the most versatile vasodilators, but selected direct-acting vasodilators, sympathetic inhibitors (prazosin), and possibly calcium channel antagonists (nifedipine and diltiazem) may be useful in certain situations. The bipyridine derivatives possess potent inotropic and vasodilating properties. The efficacy of intravenously administered amrinone and milrinone has been proven in the treatment of refractory left ventricular failure. Whether oral administration of milrinone or other bipyridine derivatives will prove to be safe and effective in the long-term treatment of chronic left ventricular failure remains uncertain.

Central and renal hemodynamic effects and hormonal response to diltiazem in severe congestive heart failure

The central and renal hemodynamic effects and the hormonal response to single doses of 60 mg and 90 mg of diltiazem were evaluated in 10 patients with severe chronic left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction 0.22 +/- 0.08). Diltiazem administration resulted in only mild and mostly statistically insignificant changes. After 60 mg, only heart rate (from 86 +/- 10 beats/min at baseline to 79 +/- 14 beats/min at 4 hours) and pulmonary vascular resistance (from 231 +/- 108 to 165 +/- 74 dynes s cm-5 at 4 hours) changed significantly. Administration of 90 mg of diltiazem resulted in no significant change in any of the measured or calculated central hemodynamic variables. Individual data, however, revealed an increase stroke volume index in 3 patients but a decrease in 1 patient and a persistent increase in mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure in another patient. These hemodynamic changes were not associated with symptomatic deterioration in any of the patients. Both renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate were impaired at baseline on both days and did not show a significant change 1, 2 and 4 hours after diltiazem administration. Similarly, no significant change was noted after either diltiazem dose in plasma catecholamine levels and renin concentration. In conclusion, administration of 60 to 90 mg of diltiazem in patients with severe chronic LV systolic dysfunction results in only mild and mostly insignificant acute effects on central and renal hemodynamics, plasma hormonal levels and patient clinical status.

Efficacy of oral diltiazem to control ventricular response in chronic atrial fibrillation at rest and during exercise

Although digoxin is often the first choice for control of ventricular response in chronic atrial fibrillation, it fails to slow exercise rates. Diltiazem, a calcium channel antagonist that slows atrioventricular conduction, was administered to 16 patients who failed to achieve adequate rate control on low level exercise testing despite digoxin therapy. Therapeutic response to diltiazem was assessed with submaximal and maximal exercise tests and 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. During the diltiazem treatment phase, ventricular response at rest diminished (96 +/- 17 versus 69 +/- 10 beats/min, p less than 0.001) as did rate during submaximal exercise (155 +/- 28 versus 116 +/- 26, p less than 0.001), maximal exercise (163 +/- 14 versus 133 +/- 26, p less than 0.001) and average ventricular response during 24 hour monitoring (87 +/- 13 versus 69 +/- 10, p less than 0.001). Rate at rest decreased 26 +/- 15% and submaximal exercise rate diminished 24 +/- 12%. Thirteen (81%) of the 16 patients exhibited at least 15% slowing of rate at rest and during submaximal exercise. Eleven patients (69%) reported alleviation of symptoms. There was no change in serum digoxin levels during diltiazem treatment (1.3 +/- 0.5 versus 1.3 +/- 0.6 ng/ml, p = NS). On withdrawal of diltiazem, ventricular response returned to baseline values. Diltiazem is an effective agent for control of ventricular response, both at rest and during exercise, in digoxin-treated patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.

Hemodynamic effects of PN 200-110 (isradipine) in congestive heart failure

PN 200-110 (isradipine), a dihydropyridine derivative, is a newly available calcium antagonist with potent vasodilatory properties. To determine if PN 200-110 might benefit patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), its acute hemodynamic effects were evaluated in a group of 12 patients with severe CHF. Measurements of cardiac performance were obtained after oral administration of placebo and 15 mg of PN 200-110. Placebo resulted in no significant changes in any of the variables. PN 200-110 decreased mean arterial pressure from 94 +/- 14 (mean +/- standard deviation) to 77 +/- 7 mm Hg (p less than 0.001) and increased both cardiac index from 2.1 +/- 0.4 to 2.8 +/- 0.6 liters/m2 (p less than 0.01) and stroke volume index from 26 +/- 7 to 36 +/- 10 ml/m2 (p less than 0.001). Systemic vascular resistance was reduced from 1,726 +/- 563 to 1,099 +/- 370 dynes s cm-5 (p less than 0.01). Neither heart rate nor pulmonary artery wedge pressure changed significantly. Of the 7 patients discharged receiving PN 200-110, 6 improved clinically and there was evidence of a substantial reduction in cardiothoracic ratio on chest x-ray in some patients. No serious side effects were encountered. Vasodilation with PN 200-110 can improve cardiac performance acutely in patients with CHF. Although this clinical experience is encouraging, carefully performed long-term trials must be done to determine the value of this drug in the management of patients with CHF.

Experience with calcium antagonist drugs in congestive heart failure

Several clinical studies have demonstrated beneficial hemodynamic effects of calcium antagonist drugs when used as arterial vasodilators in the treatment of certain patients with moderate to severe congestive heart failure. These drugs usually decrease systemic vascular resistance and improve ejection phase indexes of left ventricular function in such patients. However, calcium antagonists have intrinsic negative inotropic effects and other vasodilators such as nitroprusside, hydralazine and captopril appear to be more beneficial when used in the treatment of severe congestive heart failure.

Usefulness of calcium antagonists for congestive heart failure

In patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) due to dilated cardiomyopathy, nifedipine, diltiazem and several of the newer calcium antagonists including nicardipine, nitrendipine, felodipine and PN 200-110 (isradipine) improve left ventricular function. Because of its relatively more pronounced negative inotropic and chronotropic actions, verapamil is generally not tolerated by patients with left ventricular failure. In addition, even relatively vascular-selective agents such as nifedipine can occasionally cause significant left ventricular depression, particularly if combined with beta-adrenergic blocking agents. Comparative studies using nitroprusside to cause an equivalent decrease in arterial pressure indicate that nifedipine acts predominantly on the arterial vasculature, and that a small but significant decrease in contractility occurs, apparently due to a direct myocardial action. Although diltiazem causes a depression in myocardial contractility in dogs with volume overload heart failure, limited data show no significant negative inotropic action in patients with heart failure. The negative inotropic effects, if any, of newer and possibly more vascular-selective agents are not yet known. Calcium antagonists appear to act predominantly on the limb and coronary vasculature, with relatively less effect on renal and hepatic vessels. In patients with CHF, nifedipine causes an increase in coronary blood flow and a decrease in the aorto-coronary sinus oxygen difference indicating an improvement in myocardial energetics. Although nifedipine causes an increase in cardiac index and decreases in systemic vascular resistance and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during exercise, the limited data available fail to show a short- or long-term increase in exercise capacity. Nifedipine causes an increase in plasma renin activity, possibly due to a direct action on the kidney.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Calcium antagonists in heart failure?]

Although beneficial acute hemodynamic effects of calcium antagonists in heart failure have been reported, their use in this setting is still controversial because of the negative inotropic effects produced by these agents. The direct actions of calcium antagonists, that is direct depression of myocardial contractility and coronary and peripheral vasodilation, are modulated by systemic hypotension-induced baroreceptor activation of autonomic reflexes. Thus, at clinically relevant dosages, the baroreceptor-mediated cardiac stimulatory effects may counterbalance or override the direct negative-inotropic effects, as usually observed with nifedipine or diltiazem. By contrast, with verapamil significant depression of contractility may occur. Newer calcium antagonists with higher vasoselectivity such as nisoldipine or felodipine may be particularly interesting in the setting of congestive heart failure because of pronounced arterial vasodilatation and their additional effects on coronary blood flow, LV-regional wall motion and diastolic function and peripheral blood flow distribution with negligible myocardial effects. Due to their marked vasodilatating properties, newer derivatives may be advantageous in the treatment of heart failure due to coronary artery disease and hypertension. Although limited data concerning long-term efficacy are available, preliminary studies suggest long-term benefit in selected patients. It appears that verapamil should not be used for vasodilator therapy of severe heart failure, since deterioration of LV function may occur.

Diltiazem and reinfarction in patients with non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial

We performed a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study to evaluate the effect of diltiazem on reinfarction after a non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Nine centers enrolled 576 patients: 287 received diltiazem (90 mg every six hours) and 289 received placebo. Treatment was initiated 24 to 72 hours after the onset of infarction and continued for up to 14 days. The primary end point, reinfarction, was defined as an abnormal reelevation of MB creatine kinase in plasma within 14 days. Reinfarction occurred in 27 patients in the placebo group (9.3 percent) and in 15 in the diltiazem group (5.2 percent)--a 51.2 percent reduction in cumulative life-table incidence (P = 0.0297; 90 percent confidence interval, 7 to 67 percent). Diltiazem reduced the frequency of refractory postinfarction angina (a secondary end point) by 49.7 percent (P = 0.0345; 90 percent confidence interval, 6 to 73 percent). Mortality was similar in the two groups (3.1 and 3.8 percent, respectively, in the placebo and diltiazem groups), but adverse drug reactions (most of which were mild) were more common in the diltiazem group. Nevertheless, the drug was well tolerated, despite concurrent treatment with beta-blockers in 61 percent of the patients. We conclude that diltiazem was effective in preventing early reinfarction and severe angina after non-Q-wave infarction and that it was also safe and generally well tolerated.

Efficacy and safety of medium- and high-dose diltiazem alone and in combination with digoxin for control of heart rate at rest and during exercise in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation

We evaluated the efficacy and the safety of medium-(240 mn/day) and high-dose (360 mg/day) diltiazem alone and in combination with digoxin when used for control of heart rate in 12 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Medium-dose diltiazem was comparable to therapeutic dose of digoxin at rest (88 +/- 19 vs 86 +/- 12 beats/min) but superior during peak exercise (154 +/- 23 vs 170 +/- 20 beats/min; p less than .05). High-dose diltiazem resulted in better control of heart rate than digoxin both at rest (79 +/- 17 beats/min; p less than .05) and exercise (136 +/- 25 beats/min; p less than .05) but was associated with side effects in 75% of the patients. Combined therapy of digoxin and diltiazem enhanced the effect of digoxin alone and resulted in significantly better control of heart rate at rest (67 +/- beats/min with medium-dose and 65 +/- beats/min with high-dose diltiazem) and during peak exercise (132 +/- 32 and 121 +/- 24 beats/min, respectively). However, the difference in heart rate between these two doses was not significant. Reduction of heart rate combined with concomitant effect on blood pressure resulted in a significant fall in pressure-rate product at rest from 10,077 +/- 1708 mm Hg/min on digoxin alone to 7877 +/- 1818 mm Hg/min after the addition of medium-dose diltiazem (p less than .05) and during exercise form 25,670 +/- 3606 to 18,439 +/- 4115 mm Hg/min (p less than .05). Continued therapy with digoxin combined with diltiazem 240 mg/day for 21 +/- 8 days in nine patients showed persistent effect on heart rate and blood pressure without any toxic manifestations or change in serum digoxin (1.5 +/- 0.4 vs 1.3 +/- 0.4 ng/ml) or plasma diltiazem concentrations (204 +/- 72 vs 232 +/- 129 ng/ml). In conclusion, medium-dose diltiazem when combined with digoxin is an effective and safe regimen for the treatment of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and enhances digoxin-mediated control of heart rate both at rest and during exercise.