Lipoprotein(a) and coronary thrombosis and restenosis after stent placement

Lipoprotein(a): Insights for the Practicing Clinician

Following the discovery of the Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) molecule by Kare Berg in 1963, many physiological and pathological properties of this particle remain to be fully understood. Multiple population-based studies have demonstrated a correlation between elevated Lp(a) levels and the incidence of cardiovascular disease. Data extrapolated from the Copenhagen City Heart and ASTRONOMER studies also demonstrated the link between Lp(a) levels and the incidence and rate of progression of calcific aortic stenosis. Interest in Lp(a) has increased in recent years, partly due to new emerging therapies that can specifically reduce serum Lp(a) concentrations. Given the strong correlation between Lp(a) and CV disease from epidemiological studies, several international guidelines have also been updated to advocate Lp(a) testing in specific population groups. This review aims to highlight the importance of the role of Lp(a) in cardiovascular disease and discusses the potential of novel therapies in patients with elevated Lp(a) levels.

Clinical Factors Associated with Long Fluoroscopy Time in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions to the Culprit Lesion of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

The clinical outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) were comparable or even worse than those with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to the culprit lesions of NSTEMI would improve the clinical outcomes, some PCI require long fluoroscopy time, reflecting the difficulty of PCI. This study aims to find clinical factors associated with long fluoroscopy time in PCI to the culprit lesion of NSTEMI. We included 374 patients and divided those into the conventional fluoroscopy time (n = 302) and long fluoroscopy time (n = 72) groups according to the quintiles of fluoroscopy time. Clinical and angiographic parameters were compared between the two groups. Calcification and tortuosity were significantly more severe in the long fluoroscopy time group than in the conventional fluoroscopy time group. The prevalence of previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and bifurcation lesions was significantly greater in the long fluoroscopy time group than in the conventional fluoroscopy time group. In the multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis, previous CABG (odds ratio [OR], 3.368; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.407-8.064; P = 0.006), bifurcation lesion (OR, 2.407; 95% CI, 1.285-4.506; P = 0.006), excessive tortuosity (versus mild to moderate tortuosity; OR, 4.095; 95% CI, 1.159-14.476; P = 0.029), and moderate to severe calcification (versus none to mild; OR, 5.792; 95% CI, 3.254-10.310; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with long fluoroscopy time. In conclusion, previous CABG, bifurcation, excessive tortuosity, and moderate to severe calcification were associated with long fluoroscopy time. Our study provided a reference for PCI operators to identify the difficulties in PCI to the culprit lesion of NSTEMI.

Association of the long fluoroscopy time with factors in contemporary primary percutaneous coronary interventions

BACKGROUND

Since the long fluoroscopy time in primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) could be an indicator of delayed reperfusion, it should be important to recognize which types of lesions require longer fluoroscopy-time in primary PCI. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of the long fluoroscopy-time with clinical factors in primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).

METHODS

A total of 539 patients who underwent primary PCI were divided into the conventional fluoroscopy-time group (Q1-Q4: n = 434) and the long fluoroscopy-time group (Q5: n = 105) according to the quintile of the total fluoroscopy time in primary PCI. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to find associations between clinical variables and the long fluoroscopy-time.

RESULTS

In univariate logistic regression analysis, prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hemodialysis, and previous CABG were significantly associated with the long fluoroscopy-time. In addition, complex lesion characteristics such as lesion length, lesion angle, tortuosity, and calcification were associated with the long fluoroscopy-time. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, lesion length [per 10 mm incremental: odds ratio (OR) 1.751, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.397-2.195, P<0.001], moderate-excessive tortuosity (vs. mild tortuosity: OR 4.006, 95% CI 1.498-10.715, P = 0.006), and moderate to severe calcification (vs. none-mild calcification: OR 1.865, 95% CI 1.107-3.140, P = 0.019) were significantly associated with the long fluoroscopy-time.

CONCLUSIONS

In primary PCI for STEMI, diffuse long lesion, tortuosity, and moderate-severe calcification were associated with the long fluoroscopy-time. These complex features require special attention to reduce reperfusion time in primary PCI.

Outcomes of intravascular brachytherapy for recurrent drug-eluting in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVES

To examine the outcomes of vascular brachytherapy (VBT) for recurrent drug-eluting stents (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR).

BACKGROUND

Recurrent DES-ISR can be challenging to treat. VBT has been used with encouraging results.

METHODS

We report the long-term outcomes of patients with recurrent DES-ISR treated with VBT between January 2014 and September 2018 at a tertiary care institution. The main outcome was target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), target lesion myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion-related cardiac death. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to identify variables associated with recurrent TLF.

RESULTS

During the study period, 116 patients (143 lesions) underwent VBT. Median follow-up was 24.7 (14.5-35.4) months. The incidence of TLR, target-lesion MI, and TLF was 18.9%, 5.6%,and 20.1% at 1 year, and 29.4%, 10.5%, and 32.9% at 2 years.Initial presentation with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was independently associated with TLF (hazard ratio = 1.975, 95% CI [1.120, 3.485], p = .019). Lesions treated with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance had a lower incidence of TLR (14.3% vs. 39.6%, log-rank p = .038), and a trend toward lower incidence of TLF (19% vs. 42.6%, log-rank p = .086).

CONCLUSIONS

VBT can improve the treatment of recurrent DES-ISR, but TLF occurs in approximately one in three patients at 2 years. Initial presentation with ACS was associated with higher TLF and the use of IVUS with a trend for lower incidence of TLF.

Lipoprotein(a) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND

The mechanism for hypercoagulability in malignancy is not entirely understood. Although several studies report contrasting finding about the link between elevated plasma levels of the lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and the possible recurrence of venous thromboembolism, we perform a study to evaluate the impact of the Lp(a) in the development of portal vein thromboembolism (PVT) in patients with HCC.

METHODS

We compared 44 PVT patients with 50 healthy subjects and 50 HCC patients.

RESULTS

The comparison between PVT patients and HCC showed in the former the mean value of serum lipoprotein levels was higher than 37.3 mg/dl (p = 0.000). The comparison between PVT versus healthy controls showed that in the former, mean value of serum lipoprotein levels was higher than 75 mg/dl (p = 0.000). The predictive value test of serum lipoprotein(a) on PVT was 0.72 and on HCC was 0.83. The odds ratio of lipoprotein(a) was 9.21 on PVT and 6.33 on HCC.

CONCLUSION

Patients with PVT and HCC showed a statistical significant serum lipoprotein(a) level higher than the subjects with HCC and no PVT or the healthy subject. So we assume a role of lipoprotein(a) as predictor of venous thromboembolism in neoplastic patients.

The relationship between Lp(a) and CVD outcomes: a systematic review

Robust associations between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and CVD outcomes among general populations have been published in previous studies. However, associations in high risk primary prevention and secondary prevention populations are less well defined. In order to investigate this further, a systematic review was performed including prospective studies, which assessed the relationship between Lp(a) and CVD outcomes using multivariable analyses. Additional information was gathered on Lp(a) assays, multivariable modelling and population characteristics. Literature searches from inception up to December 2015 retrieved 2850 records. From these 60 studies were included. Across 39 primary prevention studies in the general population (hazard ratios ranged from 1.16 to 2.97) and seven high risk primary prevention studies (hazard ratios ranged from 1.01 to 3.7), there was evidence of a statistically significant relationship between increased Lp(a) and an increased risk of future CVD. Results in 14 studies of secondary prevention populations were also suggestive of a modest statistically significant relationship (hazard ratios ranged from 0.75 to 3.7).Therefore current evidence would suggest that increased Lp(a) levels are associated with modest increases in the risk of future CVD events in both general and higher risk populations. However, further studies are required to confirm these findings.

Lipoprotein(a), interleukin-10, C-reactive protein, and 8-year outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

This prospective study investigated the association between preprocedural biomarker levels and incident major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in complex patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with sirolimus-eluting stenting.

HYPOTHESIS

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) have long-term prognostic value in patients undergoing PCI.

METHODS

Between April 2002 and February 2003, 161 patients were included in the study. Blood was drawn before the procedure, and biomarkers were measured. Patients were followed-up for MACE (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization). Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine risk of MACE for tertiles of biomarkers. Both 1-year and long-term follow-up (median, 6 years; maximum, 8 years) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean age was 59 years, and 68% were men. During long-term follow-up, 72 MACE occurred (overall crude cumulative incidence: 45% [95% confidence interval (CI): 37%-52%]). Lp(a) was associated with a higher 1-year risk of MACE, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 3.1 (95% CI: 1.1-8.6) for the highest vs the lowest tertile. This association weakened and lost significance with long-term follow-up. IL-10 showed a tendency toward an association with MACE. The 1-year HR was 2.1 (95% CI: 0.92-5.0). Long-term follow-up rendered a similar result. The association of CRP with MACE did not reach statistical significance at 1-year follow-up. However, CRP was associated with long-term risk of MACE, with an HR of 1.9 (95% CI: 1.0-3.5).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective study, preprocedural Lp(a) level was associated with short-term prognosis after PCI. The preprocedural CRP level was associated with long-term prognosis after PCI.

Serum lipoprotein(a) level and clinical coronary stenosis progression in patients with myocardial infarction: re-revascularization rate is high in patients with high-Lp(a)

BACKGROUND

High serum lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels are associated with coronary artery disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The serum Lp(a) levels of 130 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who underwent direct percutaneous coronary intervention were investigated. On the basis of Lp(a) level at 1 month after the onset of AMI, the patients were classified into 2 groups (high-Lp(a) (> or =30 mg/dl) and low-Lp(a) (< 30 mg/dl)) for evaluation of the clinical coronary stenosis progression (CCSP) rate. CCSP is defined as either target lesion revascularization (TLR) or new lesion revascularization (NLR). The CCSP rate was significantly higher in the high-Lp(a) group than in the low-Lp(a) group (65.8% vs 29.3%, p<0.01). In patients who had coronary stents in the acute phase (n=79), the CCSP and NLR rates were significantly higher in the high-Lp(a) group than in the low-Lp(a) group (45.0% vs 20.3%, p<0.05; 35.0% vs 6.8%, p<0.01), but there was no significant difference in TLR rate between the 2 groups (10.0% vs 13.6%, p=0.858).

CONCLUSIONS

High serum Lp(a) level is a significant risk factor for CCSP, but does not influence restenosis after stenting.

Relationship of a comprehensive panel of plasma oxidized low-density lipoprotein markers to angiographic restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to assess the relationship between oxidized low-density lipoprotein (OxLDL) and restenosis. OxLDL induces up-regulation of inflammatory genes and cytokines and recruits monocytes to the vessel wall. Elevated levels of monocytes post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are associated with in-stent restenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred forty-one patients with stable angina pectoris had serial blood samples drawn before PCI (68% balloon only, 32% stent), immediately post-PCI and at 6 and 24 hours, 3 days, 1 week, and 1, 3, and 6 months. Plasma levels of OxLDL-E06, a measure of oxidized phospholipid (OxPL) content on apoB-100 detected by antibody E06 (OxPL/apoB), autoantibodies to malondialdehyde-LDL and copper-oxidized LDL, and apoB-immune complexes were measured in all samples. Quantitative and qualitative coronary angiography was performed with 94% angiographic follow-up. Restenosis was defined as >50% diameter stenosis (%DS). The overall angiographic restenosis rate was 32% (39% in balloon group, 16% in stent group). OxPL/apoB levels rose significantly and OxLDL autoantibody titers decreased immediately post-PCI in patients both with and without restenosis, but there were no significant differences among groups. There was also no relationship of any OxLDL marker to lesion length, %DS, or minimal lumen diameter. No differences were noted in stent versus balloon-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Serial measurement of a comprehensive panel of circulating OxLDL markers after uncomplicated PCI for stable angina does not predict restenosis.

Genetic predictive factors in restenosis

Restenosis is still the main drawback of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). It is thought to be a multifactorial process where recoil of the vessel, neointimal proliferation and thrombus formation are thought to play a role. Until now it has proven difficult to predict restenosis on clinical and procedural grounds, however, genetic epidemiology might provide more insights. In this review several genetic variables, i.e. polymorphisms that were determined in relation to restenosis are described. The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) described in the literature so far involve; the renin-angiotensin system, platelet aggregation, the inflammatory response, matrix metalloproteinases, smooth muscle cell proliferation, lipids and oxidative stress and nitric oxide. Nowadays DNA-microarrays have been developed which make it possible to test 50 or 60 polymorphisms at once. However, the risk of error due to multiple testing should be kept in mind. The results of the studies described should be interpreted with care. Many of the published studies are of relatively small sample size, which sometimes show more positive outcomes than the larger studies, this is possibly due to publication bias towards more positive results. The small sample size studies also exhibit wide confidence intervals. On the other hand, one must take into account that the process of restenosis is a multifactorial one and it is likely that multiple genes are involved. Thus, relatively small odds ratios relating to single gene contribution to restenosis can be of paramount importance when encompassed in the overall picture. Although still much research has to be done, stratification according to genetic make-up may enable tailoring of the interventional treatment to the individual patient.

Myocardial perfusion imaging following percutaneous coronary intervention: the importance of restenosis, disease progression, and directed reintervention

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become a mainstay in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease. Currently, more than one million coronary angioplasty and stent implantation procedures are performed annually. Although increasingly complex lesions and higher risk patients are being successfully treated percutaneously, restenosis and disease progression continue to cause significant morbidity. Restenosis occurs in approximately one-third of patients, one-half of who remain asymptomatic, while disease progression occurs at rates approaching 7% per year. Despite technological advances, unadjusted mortality rates have actually increased since the mid-1980s, and the current annual risk of a major adverse cardiac event following PCI is 5% to 7%. Although randomized clinical trials are needed to more definitively show a benefit, when performed six or more months following PCI, myocardial perfusion imaging reliably identifies patients most at risk of a poor long-term outcome. Directed reintervention can have a salutary impact on the prognosis of these patients. In view of recent data showing a positive impact of imaging and reintervention in patients after PCI, current guidelines should be reassessed.

Predictors of adverse long-term outcome in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: with special reference to the admission concentration of lipoprotein (a)

The predictive values for long-term outcome in 127 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after successful primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) were prospectively investigated in the present study. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal AMI, and recurrent angina. Follow-up angiography was performed in 120 patients to assess restenosis. The primary endpoint occurred in 21 patients during a follow-up period of 35+/-24 months. These patients had a higher lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentration (p=0.0105) and more prevalence of multivessel disease (p=0.0028) than the other patients. The subjects were divided into 2 groups at the 75th percentile Lp(a) value: group A had an Lp(a) concentration >or=47 mg/dl and group B <47 mg/dl. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a lower cardiac event-free survival rate in group A (p=0.0007) and in patients with multivessel disease (p=0.001). In Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, an Lp(a) level >or=47 mg/dl (relative risk[RR] 5.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-15.0, p=0.0007) and multivessel disease (RR 5.3, 95% CI 2.0-13.7, p=0.0006) were independent predictors of the primary endpoint. An elevated Lp(a) concentration on admission and multivessel disease are significant predictors for long-term adverse outcome in AMI patients treated by primary PTCA.

Lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein(a) polymorphism and restenosis after intracoronary stent placement in Type 2 diabetic patients

The relationship between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and restenosis after intracoronary stent implantation has never been analysed in diabetic patients. The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate whether Lp(a) levels and apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotypes are predictors of restenosis after elective stent implantation in Type 2 diabetic patients with de novo lesions of coronary arteries. We recruited 102 Type 2 diabetic patients with a new lesion successfully treated with elective placement of one or two Palmaz-Schatz stents. Follow-up angiography was scheduled at 6 months or earlier if clinically indicated. Seven patients were lost to the follow up. Among 95 patients enrolled, restenosis was present in 37 (38.9%) and absent in 58 (61.1%). The restenosis group showed Lp(a) levels higher than the nonrestenosis group (25.1+/-14.4 vs. 21.3+/-14.6 mg/dl), but the difference was not significant. The restenosis group had a percentage of subjects with at least one apo(a) isoform of low molecular weight (MW) significantly greater than the nonrestenosis group (75.7% vs. 55.1%; P<.05). A multiple logistic regression analysis showed that presence of multivessel disease (risk relative [RR]: 5.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21-28.15; P<.05) was the only predictor of restenosis after stent placement in diabetic patients. Lp(a) and apo(a) polymorphisms did not enter the model as predictive variables. Our study shows that the presence of multivessel disease is a predictor of restenosis after intracoronary stent implantation in diabetic patients. On the contrary, Lp(a) and apo(a) polymorphisms do not appear to be reliable markers of restenosis in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Restenosis after intracoronary stent placement: can apolipoprotein(a) polymorphism play a role?

BACKGROUND

The relationship between lipoprotein(a) and restenosis after intracoronary stent implantation has been analysed by two specific studies, but the role of apoliprotein(a) polymorphism was not considered. The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate whether lipoprotein(a) levels and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes are predictors of restenosis after elective stent implantation in patients with de novo lesions of coronary arteries.

METHODS

We recruited 182 patients with a new lesion successfully treated with elective placement of one or two Palmaz-Schatz stents. Follow-up angiography was scheduled at 6 months or earlier if clinically indicated. Nine patients were lost to the follow up. Among 173 patients enrolled, restenosis was present in 52 (30.0%) and absent in 121 (70.0%).

RESULTS

Lipoprotein(a) levels were higher in the restenosis than in the nonrestenosis group (29.5+/-17.2 versus 27.4+/-20.2 mg/dl), even if the difference did not attain statistical significance (P=0.067). The restenosis group had a percentage of subjects with at least one apolipoprotein(a) isoform of low molecular weight significantly greater than the nonrestenosis group (82.7 versus 66.9%; P=0.035). A multiple logistic regression analysis showed that multiple stenting (RR: 4.01; CI 95%: 1.65-13.91; P=0.004), presence of diabetes (RR: 3.96; CI 95%: 1.67-9.37; P=0.002) and presence of multivessel disease (RR: 2.71; CI 95%: 1.19-6.16; P=0.017) were predictors of restenosis after stent placement. Lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a) polymorphism did not enter the model as predictive variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms that multiple stenting, diabetes and multivessel disease are powerful predictors of restenosis after intracoronary stent implantation. On the contrary, lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a) polymorphism do not appear to be reliable markers of restenosis in patients with stent implantation.

The impact of plasma levels of C-reactive protein, lipoprotein (a) and homocysteine on the long-term prognosis after successful coronary stenting: The Global Evaluation of New Events and Restenosis After Stent Implantation Study

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of high plasma levels of either C-reactive protein (CRP), lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) or total homocysteine (tHCY) with the long-term prognosis after successful coronary stenting (CS).

BACKGROUND

High plasma levels of either CRP, Lp(a) or tHCY may have an impact in coronary artery disease. However, long-term prospective data after coronary stenting (CS) are limited.

METHODS

Four-hundred and eighty-three consecutive patients with either stable or unstable coronary syndromes were followed for up to three years after successful CS. The composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction or rehospitalization for rest unstable angina, whichever occurred first, was the prespecified primary end point. Moreover, the one-year incidence of clinical recurrence of symptoms, in-stent restenosis (ISR) and progression of atherosclerosis to a significant lesion (PTSL) were additionally evaluated. PTSL was defined as an increase by at least 25% in the luminal diameter stenosis of a known nonsignificant lesion (<or=50% luminal diameter stenosis) that was located in a nonintervened vessel at restudy, resulting in an angiographically significant lesion (>or=70% luminal diameter stenosis).

RESULTS

By the end of the follow-up, high plasma levels of either CRP or Lp(a) but not tHCY were independently associated with the primary end point. In particular, CRP >or=0.68 mg/dl (p < 0.001) or Lp(a) >or=25 mg/dl (p = 0.003) conferred a significantly increased risk. By 1 year, a CRP >or=0.68 mg/dl conferred a significantly increased risk for clinical recurrence of symptoms (p < 0.001) or PTSL (p < 0.001). None of the studied biochemical markers was related to ISR.

CONCLUSIONS

High plasma levels of either CRP or Lp(a) but not tHCY may be associated with a higher incidence of late adverse events after successful CS. PTSL in vessels not previously intervened upon may play a significant role in the underlying pathophysiology as opposed to ISR.

Lipoprotein (a) level and mortality in patients with critical lower limb ischaemia

OBJECTIVE

to investigate if serum lipoprotein (a) level is a predictor of survival in patients with lower limb atherosclerotic occlusive disease.

DESIGN

prospective follow up study.

METHODS

demographic, biochemical and disease variables were collected prospectively in 441 patients with lower limb arterial occlusive disease. Survival data were obtained at a mean follow up of 44 months, and significant risk factors identified by the life table method and multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

the cumulative survival for all patients at three and five years was 79% and 63%. Lipoprotein (a) level was the only significant independent biochemical predictor for all deaths and cardiorespiratory deaths on multivariate analysis, along with age, diabetes mellitus, renal impairment, cardiac diseases and major amputation. An elevated Lipoprotein(a) level of >24 mg/dl incurred a 107% and 45% increase in mortality at three and five years respectively. The higher mortality associated with elevated Lipoprotein (a) was particularly evident in patients with critical ischemia, in whom three and five year survival was reduced from 85% to 63% and 67% to 53% (p=0.0064). In claudicants a survival discrepancy was manifested only after five years (73% vs 62%), and the overall association did not reach statistic significance (p=0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

lipoprotein (a) level is a reliable biochemical marker for survival in patients with critical ischemia where traditional atherosclerosis risk factors were prevalent.

Association of lipoprotein(a) concentration and apo(a) isoform size with restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Lp(a) is a unique class of lipoprotein particles that exhibits a considerable size heterogeneity resulting from the size polymorphism of apo(a), its unique protein component. An elevated level of Lp(a) in plasma has been proposed to be a risk factor for premature development of coronary artery disease. To evaluate the relationship between Lp(a) concentration and apo(a) isoform size with restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, Lp(a) levels and apo(a) phenotypes were determined in 204 patients who underwent a successful coronary angioplasty procedure and stent implantation. The patients were followed with clinical examinations and exercise tests at 1, 3, and 6 months, and a control coronary angiography was performed after 6 months to evaluate restenosis. Lp(a) levels were determined with an ELISA that is insensitive to the size heterogeneity of Lp(a), and the apo(a) isoforms were determined by a high-resolution agarose gel electrophoresis method followed by immunoblotting with a specific monoclonal antibody. Of the 146 patients who underwent angiographic evaluation, 57 (39%) had restenosis, whereas 89 (61%) did not. Lp(a) levels and the distribution of the expressed apo(a) phenotypes were compared in these two groups of patients. Although the mean and median Lp(a) levels were higher in the restenosed group, the difference was not statistically significant. However, a significant difference in Lp(a) values was found in women (P=0.043), even though, because of the small number of women in the study (n=35), no sound conclusions can be reached on the predictive role of Lp(a) in restenosis. There also was no difference in the distribution of apo(a) phenotypes between the two groups. Because of their wide distribution, Lp(a) values and apo(a) isoforms do not seem to be a useful indicator of risk of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in our study cohort.

The role of lipoprotein[a] in atherosclerosis

Recent studies confirm and extend previous evidence that lipoprotein (Lp) plays a significant role in atherosclerosis and is one of the top five or six risk factors for cardiovascular disease. In Japanese patients, Lp levels and apo phenotypes are significant predictors for myocardial infarction. Lp levels are significantly higher in ischemic stroke patients than in controls. However, plasma concentrations of Lp are not predictive of ischemic cerebral infarction in either men or women. Serum Lp levels are significantly higher in patients with carotid plaques or measurable intima-media thickness than in controls without. Despite these associations, there is no significant relationship between Lp level and arterial endothelial function, smooth muscle response, or carotid wall thickness, even though other lipid risk factors like low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and LDL-C/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio are correlated with abnormal arterial function and structure. There is new evidence that the association of Lp with extracellular matrix (ECM) secreted by arterial smooth muscle cells increases two- to threefold the subsequent specific binding of LDL. Alpha-defensins released from activated or senescent neutrophils stimulate the binding of Lp to ECM of endothelial cells. Several factors that affect the accumulation of Lp and oxidized LDL in the arterial intima have been identified. Several recent studies have provided new insights into the physiologic role that Lp might play in compromising fibrinolysis. The interaction of Lp with cells is clearly distinct from that with ECM and with fibrinogen; the regulation sites within Lp and plasminogen for these regulatory molecules are not identical. These recent advances bring us significantly closer to understanding how Lp exerts its atherogenic and thrombogenic properties.