Technical complications of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Common Iliac Artery Access during Endovascular Thoracic Aortic Repair Facilitated by a Transabdominal Wall Tunnel

Purpose:

To describe a technique for common iliac artery (CIA) access during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair when unfavorable angulation between the CIA and the delivery sheath precludes direct arterial access.

Technique:

After retroperitoneal exposure of the CIA, a puncture site is chosen inferolateral to the surgical incision, and an 18-G trocar/cannula is advanced in alignment with the CIA through the anterior abdominal wall or skin of the upper thigh into the retroperitoneal space. Serial dilatation is performed over a guidewire placed through the cannula to create the subcutaneous tract. The trocar/cannula is replaced over the wire, and the CIA is punctured under direct vision. The guidewire is then advanced into the proximal aorta. A CIA arteriotomy is performed and the delivery system introduced over the guidewire through the tunnel into the iliac artery.

Conclusions:

Retroperitoneal exposure of the CIA with tunneled transabdominal wall delivery of the stent-graft avoids both external iliac artery injury and creation of a temporary access conduit in patients with iliac tortuosity and/or occlusive disease.

Endovascular Repair of Aortic Aneurysms: Treatment of Complications

Purpose:

To evaluate the use of interventional procedures for treating complications following endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms.

Methods:

Fifty-five patients (49 men; mean age 67.5 years) underwent endoluminal stent-graft repair of traumatic (n = 4) or arteriosclerotic (n = 51) aortic aneurysms in the thoracic (n = 3) or infrarenal (n = 52) aorta. Follow-up of therapeutic success included periodic clinical examination, angiography, and spiral computed tomography.

Results:

Discounting the 25 (45%) cases of postimplantation syndrome that did not require treatment, there were 22 complications observed in 20 (36%) patients over a mean 10-month follow-up (range 1 to 27). There were 2 transrenal endograft maldeployments, 1 case of twisted graft limbs, 2 access site problems (1 patient), 12 endoleaks (11 patients), 1 late graft limb thrombosis, 1 symptomatic internal iliac artery occlusion, 2 myocardial infarctions, and 1 transient psychosis. Seven (13%) patients did not undergo specific therapy, while 4 (7%) required operation (2 crossover bypass grafts, 1 suture revision, and 1 graft replacement). Among 9 (16%) patients treated with interventional techniques, 7 underwent percutaneous coil embolization for 8 endoleaks (7 successfully resolved). One late stent-graft disconnection required an additional stent-graft, and 1 of the 2 malpositioned endografts was repositioned. All patients remain alive with no increase in the diameter of the aneurysm in any patient.

Conclusions:

Technical problems resulting from the endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms often respond to interventional treatment.

Methods for Three-Dimensional Geometric Characterization of the Arterial Vasculature

Complex vascular anatomy often affects endovascular procedural outcome. Accurate quantitative assessment of three-dimensional (3D) in-vivo arterial morphology is therefore vital for endovascular device design, and preoperative planning of percutaneous interventions. The aim of this work was to establish geometric parameters describing arterial branch origin, trajectory, and vessel curvature in 3D space that eliminate the errors implicit in planar measurements. 3D branching parameters at visceral and aortic bifurcation sites, as well as arterial tortuosity were determined from vessel centerlines derived from magnetic resonance angiography data for three subjects. Errors in coronal measurements of 3D branching angles for the right and left renal arteries were 3.1 +/- 3.4 degrees and 7.5 +/- 3.7 degrees , respectively. Distortion of the anterior visceral branching angles from sagittal measurements was less pronounced. Asymmetry in branching and planarity of the common iliac arteries was observed at aortic bifurcations. The renal arteries possessed considerably greater 3D curvature than the abdominal aorta and common iliac vessels with mean average values of 0.114 +/- 0.015 and 0.070 +/- 0.019 mm(-1) for the left and right, respectively. In conclusion, planar projections misrepresented branch trajectory, vessel length, and tortuosity proving the importance of 3D geometric characterization for possible applications in planning of endovascular interventional procedures and providing parameters for endovascular device design.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 12 Years of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

Endovascular repair (ER) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a new technique, and reported rates of endoleak, conversion to open repair, rupture and mortality vary widely. The aim of this study was to estimate these rates from the published data, and examine how this has changed as more patients have undergone ER.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of publications identified through searches of the electronic databases EMBASE and Medline. All publications quoting endoleak, conversion to open repair, rupture and mortality rates for a series of patients undergoing ER were included.

RESULTS

163 studies pertaining to 28,862 patients undergoing ER were identified as relevant for the review and meta-analysis. The pooled estimate for operative mortality was 3.3% (95% confidence interval 2.9 to 3.6%). The pooled estimate for type 1 endoleaks was 10.5% (95% confidence interval 9.0 to 12.1%), with an annual rate of 8.4% (95% confidence interval 5.7% to 12.2%). The pooled estimate of type 2,3 and 4 endoleaks was 13.7% (95% confidence interval 12.3 to 15.3%), with an annual rate of 10.2% (95% confidence interval 7.4% to 14.1%). The pooled estimate for primary conversion to open repair was 3.8% (95% confidence interval 3.2 to 4.4%), and for secondary conversion to open repair 3.4% (95% confidence interval 2.8 to 4.2%). The pooled estimate for post-operative rupture was 1.3% (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 1.7%), with an annual rupture rate of 0.6% (95% confidence interval 0.5% to 0.8%). Multivariate meta-regression analysis showed that rates of operative mortality, post-operative rupture and total number of endoleaks all fell significantly (p<0.05) over time.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a low mortality and a gradual reduction in vascular morbidity and mortality associated with endovascular repair since it was first introduced.

Complications of Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Review

The endovascular procedure for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms has had an enormous impact on the treatment of this challenging disease. Complications, however, do occur and it is important to have a thorough understanding of the array of complications and appropriate management strategies. In this review of endovascular complications, we describe early and late complications paying particular attention to preventive, treatment and surveillance strategies.

Access sites to vascular system for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysms repair

The authors describe their experience with access sites for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a group of 165 patients treated over a 10-year period.

Endovascular treatment for aortic disease: Is a surgical environment necessary?

OBJECTIVE

Interventional radiologists, cardiologists, and vascular surgeons are capable of performing endovascular procedures successfully in their respective environments. Suboptimal anatomy or intraoperative technical problems can be encountered, and endovascular management alone is not always suitable. The objectives of this study were to define the incidence of adjunctive surgical techniques, to discuss the rationale for endovascular reconstruction in a well-developed surgical environment, and to assess the effect of experience on the incidence of adjunctive repair.

METHODS

All primary aortic and aortoiliac elective, urgent, and emergent endovascular procedures performed at the Peter Lougheed Center and entered into a prospective database from May 25, 1999 to June 01, 2005, were reviewed. All adjunctive surgical techniques to enable stent deployment, enhance attachment site, or solve intraoperative difficulties were captured. The study period was divided into two time periods based on learning curve data to assess the effect of experience on the rate of adjunctive repairs.

RESULTS

Four hundred thirty-eight patients underwent elective (80%), urgent (15%), or emergent (5%) endovascular procedures during the study period. These consisted of 101 thoracic and 337 abdominal operations, including the use of 13 fenestrated stents. One hundred thirty-nine patients (31.7%) required 180 open surgical procedures. Complete data were available for the entire patient cohort. The mean follow-up was 793.2 days (SD, 519.1 days). Procedures were necessary for vascular access, arterial dissection/rupture, limb ischemia, and enhancement/elongation of the stent attachment site. The persistent endoleak rate was 5.3%, the late rupture rate was 0.7%, the conversion rate was 1.6%, the 30-day surgical mortality rate was 3.2%, all-cause mortality to date is 7.3%, and the reintervention rate was 4.6%. There was no statistically significant effect of the learning curve on the incidence of surgical adjunctive procedures in either the thoracic group (11/26 [42.3%] for phase 1 vs 17/75 [22.6%] for phase 2) or the abdominal group (14/50 [28.0%] for phase 1 vs 97/287 [33.8%] for phase 2). Overall, 31.5% of patients required adjunctive surgical repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful endografting requires endovascular expertise in addition to a well-developed surgical environment to increase applicability and decrease patient risk. Despite advances in endovascular technology, hybrid techniques will continue to be required to achieve good overall success rates.

Assessment of Automatic Vessel Tracking Techniques in Preoperative Planning of Transluminal Aortic Stent Graft Implantation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate automatic vessel tracking techniques in the course of preoperative planning prior to transluminal aortic endograft implantation by comparing accuracy, reproducibility, and postprocessing time with source image and volume-rendered analysis methods.

METHODS

Multislice computed tomography datasets of 5 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms were preoperatively examined, performing volumetric analysis of diameter and position of renal artery orifices, aneurysmal neck, maximal aneurysmal extension, aortic bifurcation, and iliac arteries and bifurcation. Analysis was realized by utilizing transverse datasets, volume rendering, and automated vessel tracking strategies (MxView, Philips, Best, The Netherlands). Measurement techniques were evaluated by 2 independent readers 3 times for each patient and measurement modality. Statistical analysis evaluated accuracy of the measurements and intra- and interobserver reliability. Postprocessing time was documented.

RESULTS

Using transverse source datasets, intraobserver reliability ranged from 0.49 to 0.58. Intraobserver reliability improved to 0.7 to 0.98 when volume-rendered datasets were evaluated. Interobserver variability for transverse and volume-rendered datasets ranged from 0.49 to 0.76 and 0.70 to 0.96, respectively. Automated vessel tracking datasets did not demonstrate any intra- or interobserver variability. Based on transverse datasets, the length and diameter of iliac arteries and location and diameter of the aneurysmal neck were measured as statistically different in all cases in contrast to volume rendering and automated segmentation techniques. Postprocessing time consumption for measurements based on transverse, volume-rendered, and automated tracking segmentation datasets averaged 3.32 minutes, 25.43 minutes, and 2.24 minutes, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative measurements improve significantly if datasets are evaluated based on volume-rendering techniques. This time-consuming procedure can be shortened, while further reducing observer variability, with automatic segmentation techniques.

Endograft limb occlusion and stenosis after ANCURE endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to define the incidence and treatment of endograft limb stenosis or occlusion (endograft limb dysfunction [ELD]) in a single center with the ANCURE unsupported bifurcated or aortouniiliac endograft by using intraoperative completion angiography and postoperative color duplex ultrasound scanning (CDU).

METHODS

Sixty-seven endografts (58 bifurcated, 9 uniiliac) were implanted between February 1996 and July 2000. Intraoperative completion aortography was performed in every patient. Postoperative assessment of the endograft consisted of CDU and computed tomography scanning and kidney, ureter and bladder radiographs within 7 days of implantation, at 3 and 6 months after the operation, and every 6 months thereafter.

RESULTS

At the time of endograft implantation, widely patent normal-appearing endograft limbs were revealed by means of the initial completion angiogram in 58 of 67 patients (group 1). ELD subsequently developed in seven of these 58 patients (13.4%). The results of the completion angiogram were not normal in the remaining nine patients (group 2), leading to the deployment of a self-expanding stent within the endograft limbs. The results of subsequent angiography were normal. No ELD has occurred in any patient in group 2 to date. The primary assisted patency rate at 30 months was 88% +/- 5.2% for group 1 versus 100% +/- 0% for group 2 (P = not significant, Log-rank test). Postoperative ELD occurred in seven patients (10.4%). Endovascular graft thrombosis occurred in three patients (3 endograft limbs). In each case, an endovascular approach was attempted; however, the guidewire would not traverse the occluded endovascular graft limb. Revascularization was accomplished by means of femorofemoral bypass grafting. Endovascular graft stenosis occurred in four patients (4 endograft limbs). Three patients with bifurcated endografts and limb stenosis who had no symptoms diagnosed by means of CDU were successfully treated by means of balloon angioplasty with self-expanding stent implantation, and the endograft limbs remained patent at 3, 5, and 26 months follow-up. The remaining patient who had an aortouniiliac endograft with recurrent severe stenoses underwent endograft explantation and aortobifemoral bypass grafting. The overall incidence of ELD during or after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair was 23.8% (16 of 67 patients).

CONCLUSION

Unsupported endografts are at risk for developing ELD. The use of stents for limb support at the time of the initial endograft implantation may prevent subsequent ELD and bears further study. Endograft limb occlusion usually presents with acute severe ischemic symptoms, and the failure of operative thrombectomy necessitates femorofemoral artery bypass grafting. Endograft limb stenosis is identified by means of CDU surveillance in the postoperative period. Prompt treatment with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stent yields satisfactory primary assisted patency. Intraoperative intravenous ultrasound scanning, oblique angiograms, pressure gradients, and completion angiography may be necessary to detect and treat ELD.

Early vascular complications after endovascular repair of aortoiliac aneurysms

The purpose of this study was to estimate the frequency of and review the treatment options for intraoperative endograft access-related vascular complications and early postoperative vascular complications of endovascular repair for aortoiliac aneuryms (EVAR). Between February 1998 and April 2000, 53 patients (46 males, 7 females) with aneurysms of the abdominal aorta (AAA) and iliac arteries were treated with endovascular grafts (48 AAA, and 5 iliac aneurysms). All procedures were performed using open exposure of the femoral arteries. One patient with an AAA was converted to open repair (primary technical success, 98.1%). We recorded the need for adjunctive vascular procedures or intervention to the access arteries (iliofemoral) or the endograft because of thrombosis or distal embolization. Events were classified as either intraoperative, early postoperative (< 30 postoperative days), or late postoperative. Their etiology and treatment were recorded. The results were compared to those from other series reported in the literature and to published registry data. From our results we concluded that the need for adjunctive vascular procedures to the iliofemoral arteries at the time of EVAR is significant. These procedures are necessary to either repair damage to the access arteries from the delivery system or provide a conduit for graft delivery in cases where the access arteries are inadequate. Early postoperative vascular complications are due to technical factors resulting in residual graft limb stenoses. Both intraoperative and early postoperative vascular complications after EVAR are more common in female patients. These complications can be effectively treated with a variety of open surgical and transfemoral endovascular techniques.

The evolving technique of endovascular stenting of abdominal aortic aneurysm; time for reappraisal

PURPOSE

to investigate the occurrence of intra-operative device-related complications during stent-grafting for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

data on patient characteristics, vascular morphology, operative technical details, procedural and device-related complications were obtained from the European collaborators on stent-graft techniques for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EUROSTAR) registry. Only intra-operative device-related complications were taken into account. Potential risk factors for device-related complications were examined by logistic regression analysis. The association between these complications and conversion to open surgery and death were determined.

RESULTS

between January 1994 and July 2000, 2862 patients in 90 participating hospitals underwent endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Device-related complications occurred in 238 (8.3%) patients. Complications were associated with the age of the patient (p=0.002), gender (p=0.05), smoking habit (p=0.001), pre-operative aneurysm diameter (p=0.005), type of device implanted (p=0.0001), fitness of the patient for open surgery (p=0.002), and year of operation (p=0.001). Adjusted for risk factors, the occurrence of complications decreased between 1994 to 2000 from 21.7% to 7.3%, respectively. Patients with device-related complications were 13.6 times (95% CI; 9.2-20.1) more likely to have conversion to an open procedure and 2.4 times (95% CI; 1.4-4.0) more likely to die within 30 days of the operation.

CONCLUSIONS

intra-operative device-related complications were common, although appear to be decreasing in frequency, and were significantly related to conversion and post-operative death.

Early experience with the bifurcated Excluder endoprosthesis for treatment of the abdominal aortic aneurysm

PURPOSE

This report describes our initial experience with the modular, bifurcated Excluder endoprosthesis and its safety and efficacy in the primary endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).

METHODS

AAAs (mean diameter, 58.2 +/- 14.3 mm) were repaired in 19 patients with this device between March 1999 and January 2000. The mean age of patients was 71.8 +/- 8.4 years (range, 57-86 years). This modular device was inserted through an 18F introducer sheath placed in one femoral artery, and the contralateral artery was cannulated with a 12F introducer sheath. All procedures were performed in a standard operating room with angiographic capabilities.

RESULTS

Endograft deployment was successful in all patients. The average surgical time was 135 +/- 37 minutes, with a mean blood loss of 229 +/- 138 mL. In eight patients, the use of either aortic or iliac extenders was required for enhanced sealing or additional length. An external iliac artery dissection occurring at the time of endograft insertion was successfully treated with a Wallstent. Type II leaks initially found to be present by means of intraoperative completion angiography had spontaneously thrombosed by the 1-month follow-up computed tomography scan. There was one perioperative death (5.3%). Complications included superficial wound infections (n = 3) and a nonfatal myocardial infarction (n = 1). The mean length of hospital stay was 2.9 +/- 1.2 days, and only six patients required intensive care. Endoleaks were seen in four patients (21%) by means of the 30-day computed tomography scan; three of these endoleaks had spontaneously sealed at the time of the 6-month follow-up examination (5.5% 6-month endoleak rate). Aneurysm size did not increase in the patients with leaks.

CONCLUSION

The Excluder endoprosthesis was an effective means of excluding an infrarenal AAA from the systemic circulation in this selected group of patients. The smaller sheath sizes may increase the pool of potential candidates. Further study of this device is warranted, and continued assessment of the long-term durability of the device will be necessary.

Impact of endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms in octogenarians

A total of 50 consecutive patients (86% male; median age, 82 years) underwent endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) ranging from 4.0 to 9.0 cm (median, 5.2 cm). Efficacy of aneurysm exclusion was assessed by angiography, duplex scan, and/or contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Acute technical success was 82%. Access failed in one patient, and immediate conversion to open operation was required in two patients. Improper deployment of the endoluminal graft (ELG) across the renal arteries occurred in one patient. The median operation time, estimated blood loss, packed red blood cells received, contrast volume, and length of intensive care and hospital stay were 128 min, 200 mL, 0.1 unit, 297 mL, 0.9 days, and 3 days, respectively. ELG limb thrombosis was seen in one patient. There were 4 (8%) early endoleaks, and 2 endoleaks were discovered in other patients at 3 and 6 months. Local/vascular and remote/systemic postoperative complications were seen in 13 (26%) and 9 (18%) patients, respectively. At a median follow-up of 11 months (range 2 to 36 months), clinical success was 78%. The aneurysm sac diameter (n = 49) decreased from a preoperative median of 5.2 to 4.7 cm (p = 0.0001). Technical success was high, and results at 11 months were satisfactory. Long-term outcomes require further study.

Analysis of initial CT findings after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

PURPOSE

To determine the spectrum and frequency of specific computed tomographic (CT) findings in the acute period after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CT images obtained 1--3 days after endograft placement were evaluated in 88 patients. The images were analyzed for stent position, appearance of endograft components, perigraft leak, and postoperative findings including air and acute thrombus within the aneurysm and air surrounding the femoral-femoral bypass graft. Findings that could be misinterpreted as perigraft leak were evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifteen (17%) of 88 patients had perigraft leak in the acute postoperative period. The bare segment of the proximal self-expanding stent covered one or both renal arteries in 54 (61%) patients. One patient had CT evidence of renovascular compromise. Postoperative air was within the aneurysmal sac in 51 (58%) patients and surrounded the femoral-femoral bypass graft in 67 (94%) of 71 patients in whom the grafts were evaluated with CT. Mottled attenuation within the aneurysmal sac was seen in 50 (57%) patients. Forty-six (52%) patients had calcifications within longstanding thrombus. In 31 (35%) patients, findings that could have been misinterpreted as perigraft leak were identified.

CONCLUSION

Accurate analysis of CT findings after endovascular AAA repair requires careful review of all available CT images (preprocedural and pre- and postcontrast) and clear understanding of specific stent-graft components and placement.

Ancillary techniques to facilitate endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms

PURPOSE

The ability to treat abdominal aortoiliac aneurysms and thoracic aortic aneurysms may be limited by coexisting arterial disease. Device deployment may be impaired by occlusive disease and tortuosity of the arteries used to access the aneurysm or by suitability of the implantation sites. In this study we describe the auxiliary procedures performed to circumvent these obstacles and thereby enable endovascular aneurysm repair.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1, 1993, and December 31, 1999, 390 patients treated for aneurysm of the aorta with endovascular devices were entered prospectively in a vascular registry. Fifty (12%) of the 390 patients required adjunctive surgical techniques to (1) create or extend the length of the proximal or distal device implantation site or (2) permit device navigation through diseased iliac arteries. Auxiliary techniques used to extend or enhance implantation sites were elephant trunk graft (n = 2), the construction of renovisceral bypass grafts (n = 1), and subclavian artery transposition (n = 2). Plication of the common iliac artery at its bifurcation was performed in conjunction with femorofemoral bypass graft in nine patients to allow preservation of pelvic circulation by avoiding internal iliac artery sacrifice. Construction of a bypass graft to transpose the internal iliac artery orifice was performed in one patient. The auxiliary techniques used to facilitate device navigation were iliac artery angioplasty or stenting (n = 8), external iliac artery endovascular endarterectomy or straightening (n = 14), endoluminal iliofemoral bypass conduit (n = 5), and the construction of an open iliofemoral bypass conduit (n = 8).

RESULTS

Successful deployment of the endovascular devices was achieved in 49 (98%) of 50 patients. Auxiliary techniques were successful in providing access for endovascular device deployment in all 35 patients (100%). Mean follow-up for techniques to facilitate device navigation is 26 months for endovascular procedures and 42 months for the open bypass graft construction patients; no occlusions were observed at this moment. There were five patients with incisional hematomas that did not necessitate intervention. Fourteen (94%) of 15 patients underwent successful device implantation after the auxiliary maneuvers to enhance implantation site. Mean follow-up for implantation site manipulation is 28 months. One of the subclavian transpositions had a new onset of Horner's syndrome, two of nine patients who had common iliac artery ligated had retroperitoneal hematomas that did not necessitate interventions, and no colon ischemia was seen. The patient who underwent nonanatomic bypass grafting of viscero-renal arteries had a retroperitoneal hematoma that necessitated reexploration.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant coexisting arterial disease may be encountered in patients with aortic or iliac aneurysms. Identification of coexisting arterial diseases is essential to help tailor the appropriate supplemental surgical procedure to allow the performance of endovascular aneurysm repair in patients who would otherwise require open surgical repair.

EVT endovascular graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND

A variety of prostheses are now available for the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Significant advantages of the EVT device are its unibody design, secure hook attachment system and graft fabric approximating that used in conventional surgery.

METHODS

Implantation of the EVT device was attempted in 60 patients who were studied prospectively with an analysis of subsequent problems encountered.

RESULTS

Conversion to open repair was required in four cases (6.7%). There were nine tube grafts inserted, 13 aorto-unilateral iliac with crossover grafts and 34 aorto-bi-iliac grafts. There was one death (mortality 1.7%). Endoleaks were identified in eight patients (14%), none of which were proximal; three sealed spontaneously, two were treated with coil embolization, two are being observed and one patient had an iliac attachment converted to an open anastomosis. Access vessel problems were seen in 21 patients (35%); two-thirds were corrected at the time of initial surgery. Seven patients (12%) had primary graft limb problems identified and treated before leaving the operating room. Nine patients (16%) developed secondary graft limb problems, which were diagnosed and treated after the initial surgery. Endovascular treatment was used in eight and was successful in six with surgical revision required in two. On review of these cases to assess if the problem could have been predicted at the time of initial surgery, it was felt that more aggressive treatment of intraoperatively diagnosed graft limb stenoses, even though considered mild, may have prevented 50% of subsequent secondary graft limb occlusions.

CONCLUSION

Although the EVT device has significant advantages in the endovascular management of aortic aneurysm, potential graft limb problems need to be actively identified with the majority able to be successfully managed by supplementary endovascular techniques.

Endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms: critical events and adjunctive procedures

OBJECTIVE

We sought to define the learning curve relative to the incidence and range of intraoperative problems and to establish guidelines for troubleshooting during the endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated our first 75 consecutive cases over a 12-month period and focused on perioperative critical events and adjunctive procedures as categorical outcome measures collected during the operation. Patients were separated into three groups on the basis of the date of their operation, such that group 1 consisted of our first 25 cases, group 2 our next 25 cases, and group 3 our last 25 cases.

RESULTS

At least one critical event and adjunctive procedure marked 67 (89%) of 75 cases. In 51%, there were at least two critical events and adjunctive procedures. There were no immediate open conversions or intraoperative deaths. Access problems occurred in 28% of the 75 cases and were addressed by use of brachial-femoral artery access (30%), iliac artery/aortic bifurcation balloon angioplasty (8%), and iliofemoral conduits (4%). Graft foreshortening was the most common deployment event (44%), necessitating distal covered extensions. Iliac graft limb twists and kinks occurred in 12% of cases and were managed with balloon angioplasty and uncovered stents. General incidents included balloon ruptures (10%), arterial dissections (6%), iliac artery rupture (2.6%), and lower extremity ischemia (4%). The two cases of iliac artery rupture were managed with distal covered extensions, and there were no cases of atheroemboli. Intraoperative endoleaks were encountered in 44% of the cases and included proximal attachment sites (15%), distal attachment sites (9%), type 2 sources, and "blushes." Management of intraoperative endoleaks included proximal/distal covered extensions and re-ballooning. Our 30-day endoleak rate was 20%. The incidence of critical events did not decrease in the latter one third compared with the first two thirds of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Critical events occur frequently during endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms. The intraoperative problems range from the common endoleaks, access and deployment issues, and balloon ruptures, to rare but life-threatening complications such as iliac artery rupture. A toolbox of accessories that includes wires, catheters, large balloons, covered proximal and distal extensions, and uncovered stents is essential given the frequency of adjunctive procedures. Successful aortic endografting requires more than mere familiarity with basic endovascular techniques.

Geometric changes in aortic endografts over a 2-year observation period

PURPOSE

To report geometric changes in bifurcated aortic endografts observed over a 2-year follow-up period.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients (21 men; mean age 68 years, range 57-83) with abdominal aortic aneurysms were treated with an endovascular stent-graft. Follow-up examinations included spiral computed tomographic scanning postoperatively and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment. Geometric changes were measured using 3-dimensional reconstructed images in anteroposterior (AP) and lateral projections. Locations for the measurements were the proximal neck, the midportion of the endograft, and the graft limbs at the origin of the iliac arteries.

RESULTS

Lateral changes predominated, demonstrating maximum angles on the side of the inserted left limb. For the proximal neck, the stent angle changed by a mean -0.71 degrees in the AP and 4.0 degrees in the lateral projection. At the midgraft, changes were -0.56 degrees for AP and 12.5 degrees for lateral. The right limb showed an angle of 6.43 degrees in AP and -0.43 degrees in lateral, whereas the left limb angles changed 1.38 degrees in AP and 11.71 degrees in the lateral plane after 2 years. There was no statistically significance difference in these changes from baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic endografts are exposed to a significant amount of movement after insertion, but the resultant changes are very inhomogeneous, unpredictable, and ongoing even after 2 years. The most vulnerable location seems to be the attachment zone of the modular graft limb. These geometric changes might be one cause for late complications, including leaks and limb dislocations.

Relationship between preoperative patency of the inferior mesenteric artery and subsequent occurrence of type II endoleak in patients undergoing endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was (1) to find out whether preoperative inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) patency (on radiographic imaging) predicts IMA-related endoleaks after endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms, (2) to determine feasibility of measuring aneurysm sac pressures in patients with endoleaks, and (3) to report early evidence of effective endovascular obliteration of IMA endoleaks.

METHODS

We studied 76 consecutive cases of infrarenal aortic aneurysms that were repaired with an endovascular approach (March 1998-April 1999).

RESULTS

There were 13 (17%) endoleaks persistent 30 days after the procedure. Eleven (85%) of these 13 were IMA-related endoleaks, which were documented with selective superior mesenteric artery angiography. The preoperative finding (on computed tomographic scan) of a patent IMA does not always predict an IMA-related endoleak, but results in a statistically and clinically significant higher ratio of patients with IMA-related endoleaks in the immediate postoperative period (24% versus 3%, P <.035). In eight of the 11 patients with persistent IMA-related endoleaks, measurement of intra-aneurysm sac pressures was possible, and six of these patients had systemic pressures within the excluded aneurysm sac. Nine (82%) of 11 IMA-related endoleaks were successfully obliterated by means of selective IMA embolization.

CONCLUSIONS

Many endoleaks are caused by a patent IMA, and this can result in persistence of systemic pressure within the aneurysm sac. The preoperative finding (on computed tomographic scan) of a patent IMA is a predictor of increased rates of IMA endoleaks, and IMA endoleaks can be successfully obliterated through endovascular procedures, after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Complications of endovascular repair for thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysm: an imaging spectrum

Endovascular stent-graft implantation is an alternative to conventional open surgery for the treatment of aortic aneurysm. Forty-nine consecutive patients with aortic aneurysm (thoracic, n = 17; infrarenal, n = 32) were treated with endovascular stent-graft implantation. Complications occurred in 25 patients (two patients had two complications): endoleak (n = 13), graft thrombosis (n = 5), graft kinking (n = 2), pseudoaneurysm caused by graft infection (n = 1), graft occlusion (n = 1), shower embolism (n = 1), perforation of mural thrombus by means of inadvertent penetration of delivery system (n = 1), colon necrosis (n = 1), aortic dissection (n = 1), and hematoma at the arteriotomy site (n = 1). Imaging findings were analyzed for spiral computed tomography, plain abdominal radiography, transesophageal echocardiography, and digital subtraction angiography. Since some of these complications are fatal, radiologists need to instantly and accurately recognize them. Awareness and understanding of possible complications should help ensure a safe, successful procedure.

Which factors increase the risk of conversion to open surgery following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair? The EUROSTAR collaborators

OBJECTIVE

to identify factors that increase the risk of conversion to open surgery following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and to assess their outcome. Design analysis of 1871 patients enrolled in the EUROSTAR collaborators registry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

patient characteristics, anatomic features of the aneurysm, type of endovascular device, institutional experience and the year in which the procedure was performed were related to risk of conversion.

RESULTS

forty-nine patients (2.6%) required conversion. In 38 patients conversion was performed during the first postoperative month (primary conversions) and in 11 patients during follow-up (secondary conversions). Primary conversion was mostly due to access problems and device migration. Secondary conversions were performed for rupture in six and for a persistent endoleak, with or without aneurysmal growth, in five patients. Patients who were converted were significantly older, had a lower body weight, and had a higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Conversion was associated with shorter, wider infrarenal necks and larger aneurysms. The conversion rate was lower when a team had performed more than 30 procedures, and in procedures performed during the last two years of the study period. The conversion rate was higher with EVT or Talent devices. Patients who required primary conversion had an 18% mortality rate, compared to 2.5% mortality in patients without conversion (p<0.01). Secondary conversion was associated with a perioperative mortality of 27%, and when performed for rupture 50%.

CONCLUSION

both primary conversion and secondary conversion for rupture carry a high operative mortality. Awareness of the risk factors may reduce conversion rate as well as early and medium term mortality.

Predictive factors for early success of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

To identify predictive factors for postoperative success and potential predictors for satisfactory outcome of endovascular grafting for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), we collected data from our prospective database, which includes a series of consecutive patients undergoing endovascular repair at the Vascular Surgery Unit, Policlinico Monteluce, Perugia, Italy. From April 1997 to July 1998, 202 patients were referred to our Unit for elective AAA repair; 94 patients (47%) were selected for endografting. Placement of the graft using endovascular technique without conversion to open laparotomy, in addition to no mortality, major morbidity, or endoleak at 30-day follow-up, was defined as postoperative success. The influence of anatomical features on postoperative results was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Our experience shows that endoluminal repair of AAA is safe and effective in the short term and male patients with small aneurysms are optimal candidates for successful repair.

Incidence and treatment of intraoperative technical problems during endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence and management of intraoperative technical problems during endovascular repair (EVR) of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).

METHODS

From February 1995 to March 1999, 204 EVRs of nonruptured AAA were performed at our institution. One hundred seventy-six patients had an in-house custom-made graft; 172 were aorto-uni-iliac grafts, and four were aortoaortic grafts. Twenty- eight patients had a bifurcated graft. One hundred fourteen patients (56%) were high risk for conventional open repair. One hundred nine patients (53%) were not suitable for most commercially available devices.

RESULTS

Intraoperative technical problems occurred in 81 patients (40%). There were 37 endoleaks (27 proximal, 10 distal), 15 graft stenoses, one failure of graft deployment, two graft thromboses, three aortoiliac ruptures, five renal artery occlusions (one bilateral, four unilateral), and 18 internal iliac occlusions (five bilateral, 13 unilateral). Endovascular management of these problems was successful in 37 of the 81 patients (46%) and included 15 balloon dilatations, 21 additional stent placements, and one graft thrombectomy. Fifteen of the 81 patients (19%) had open procedures (four periaortic ligature placements, six open aneurysm repairs, three common iliac ligations, and two extra-anatomic bypass grafts). In the remaining 29 patients, the on-table problem was managed expectantly. During follow-up, two of 37 patients (5%) who were treated successfully with endovascular procedures experienced recurrence. There were five deaths (33%) among the 15 patients who underwent open procedures.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative problems occur frequently during the endovascular management of complex aneurysms. Many of these problems can be managed with additional endovascular techniques without an increased risk of recurrence or procedure-related complications. Open procedures in high-risk patients carry a high mortality rate. The team performing EVR of AAA should be skillful in advanced endovascular and open surgical procedures.

Malpositioned or dislocated aortic endoprostheses: repositioning using percutaneous pull-down maneuvers

PURPOSE

To present the capabilities and potential complications of 2 percutaneous techniques for repositioning malpositioned or dislodged aortic endografts.

METHODS

Seven male patients (median age 67.9 years, range 59 to 78) required correction of misplaced or dislocated endografts in the thoracic (n = 1) or infrarenal abdominal aorta (n = 6). In 1 patient, an infrarenal bifurcated stent-graft was mistakenly deployed across a renal artery; repositioning was accomplished by tugging caudally on a guidewire placed across the endograft bifurcation and exteriorized from both femoral arteries. An inflated balloon catheter was used to reposition 3 dislocated aortic devices (1 thoracic, 2 infrarenal) and 3 iliac graft limbs that had disconnected from the main graft body 6 to 12 months after implantation.

RESULTS

Repositioning maneuvers were successful in all cases, with the devices being moved from 5 to 27 mm (median 7.8 mm). There were no procedure-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonsurgical repositioning of misplaced aortic prostheses is technically feasible in individual cases. The risk associated with the procedure, however, cannot yet be evaluated.

Early complications and endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: report of a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was the identification of risk factors for adverse events and the assessment of the early success rate in 1554 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) who underwent treatment with endovascular technique between January 1994 and March 1999. For this purpose, the clinical and procedural data were correlated with observed complications and endoleaks.

METHODS

The data were collected from 56 European centers and submitted to a central registry. Patient characteristics, aortoiliac anatomic features, operative technical details, types of devices used, and experience of the teams of physicians were correlated with the occurrence of complications and endoleaks. The technical success rate was assessed according to the Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter, guidelines. For the assessment of correlations between risk factors and adverse events, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was used.

RESULTS

The operative complications were grouped into three categories: failure to complete the procedure (39 patients, of which 27 underwent a conversion to an open AAA repair; 2.5%); device-related or procedure-related complications (149 patients; 10%); and arterial complications (51 patients; 3%). The most important risk factors for failure to complete the procedure included an aneurysm diameter of 60 mm or more and the need for adjuvant procedures. The factors that predicted device-related and arterial complications were the experience of the team with endovascular AAA treatment and the need for adjuvant procedures. Forty patients (2.6%) died within 30 days after operation. American Society of Anesthesiologists III and IV operative risk classification results predicted higher mortality rates than did American Society of Anesthesiologists operative risk classification I and II results. The patients who underwent operation in 1994, the first year documented in this registry, and those who required adjuvant procedures also had an increased risk of perioperative death. The incidence rate of systemic complications within the first 30 days (279 patients; 18%) was higher in patients aged 75 years or more, in patients with an impaired cardiac status, and in patients considered unfit for an open procedure. An endoleak was detected at the completion of the procedure in 16% of the cases and was still present after 1 month in 9%. The risk factors for primary endoleaks were female gender and age of 75 years and older. The observed technical success rate in this patient series was 72%.

CONCLUSION

The learning curve of the doctors and the need for adjuvant procedures were independent risk factors of operative device-related and arterial complications. The importance of proper instruction during an institution's initial phase with this treatment is emphasized by these observations. Although the endovascular management of AAAs is less stressful than open surgery, systemic complications were still the most common adverse events during the first postoperative month. These complications were associated with several patient-related factors, including advanced age, impaired cardiac status, and poor general medical condition. These observations may be a guide for improved patient selection for endovascular AAA repair.

Leakages after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms: classification based on findings at CT, angiography, and radiography

PURPOSE

To ascertain whether the configuration and location of leakages identified at computed tomography (CT) could provide evidence of their angiographically and fluoroscopically confirmed causes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients aged 26-79 years underwent endovascular repair of traumatic (n = 4) or arteriosclerotic (n = 46) aortic aneurysms (four thoracic, 46 infrarenal). Radiographic examinations in three planes and helical CT were performed 1 week after implantation and every 3 months thereafter. Angiography was performed when there was evidence of a leakage at CT.

RESULTS

CT demonstrated evidence of leakages in 13 patients. Broad-based leakages immediately adjacent to the prosthesis were termed "perigraft leakages." If the area most affected by the leakage lay along the border of the aneurysm, then retrograde leakages were apparent at angiography. If the leakage was ventral to the prosthesis, then its source was the inferior mesenteric artery; if it was dorsolateral, then it was supplied by either the lumbar arteries or the median sacral artery through the hypogastric artery. One circumferential leakage could not be evaluated adequately at CT or angiography. Radiography depicted a rupture of the stent mesh in the middle of the prosthesis. Selective angiography demonstrated all types of leakages and permitted CT classification.

CONCLUSION

The cause of a leakage can be determined with CT on the basis of its configuration and location in the majority of cases.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm measurements for endovascular repair: intra- and interobserver variability of CT measurements

OBJECTIVES

to evaluate the intra- and interobserver variability in measurements of the aorta and iliac arteries in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) considered for endovascular repair using computed tomography angiography (CTA).

METHODS

the diameter of the neck, aneurysm, right and left iliac artery were measured by 5 observers in 10 consecutive patients. Measurements were performed on hard copy using a ruler and on a workstation using an electronic caliper.

RESULTS

the intraobserver variability showed a decrease going from hard copy to workstation in the standard deviation of the differences of the paired observations for the neck from 3.54 mm to 1.18 mm; for the aorta from 4.16 to 1.72 mm; for the right iliac from 1.87 to 1.01 mm; for the left iliac from 2.07 to 0.87 mm. The interobserver variability showed a similar decrease for the neck in all ten pairs of observers; for the aorta in two, for the right iliac and left iliac in five. However, the difference between observers regularly exceeded 2 mm.

CONCLUSION

the use of a workstation and electronic calipers results in lower intra- and interobserver variability. However, the results still show a clinically relevant difference between the observers. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an automatic observer-independent measurement technique.

Epidural anesthesia reduces length of hospitalization after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

PURPOSE

The low invasiveness of endoluminal abdominal aneurysm repair (EAAR) appears optimal for the use of epidural anesthesia (EA). However, reported series on EAAR show that general anesthesia (GA) is generally preferred. To evaluate the feasibility and problems encountered with EA for EAAR, patients undergoing EAAR with EA and patients undergoing EAAR with GA were examined.

METHODS

From April 1997 through October 1998, EAAR was performed on 119 patients at the Unit of Vascular Surgery at Policlinico Monteluce in Perugia, Italy. Four patients (3%) required conversion to open repair and were excluded from the analysis because they were not suitable candidates for evaluating the feasibility of EA. The study cohort thus comprised 115 patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair with the AneuRx Medtronic stent graft. The incidence of risk factors and anatomical features of the aneurysm were compared in patients selected for EA or GA on the basis of intention-to-treat analysis. Intraoperative and perioperative data were compared and analyzed on the basis of intention-to-treat and on-treatment analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients (54%) underwent the surgical procedure with EA (group A), and 54 (46%) underwent the surgical procedure with GA (group B). Conversion from EA to GA was required in four patients (3 of 61 patients, 5%). There were no statistically significant differences between the two study groups in demographics, clinical characteristics, and American Society of Anesthesiology classification (ASA). There was no perioperative mortality. Major morbidity occurred in 3% of patients (group B). According to intention-to-treat analysis, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in mean operating time, fluoro time, blood loss, amount of contrast media used, mean units of transfused blood, need of intensive care unit, mean postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative endoleak. Conversely, significant differences were found by means of on-treatment analysis in the need of intensive care unit (0 vs 5 patients; P =.02), and length of hospitalization (2.5 vs 3.2 days; P =.04). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that GA and ASA 4 were positive independent predictors of prolonged (more than 2 days) postoperative hospitalization (hazard ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 5.8; P =.03, and hazard ratio, 5.1; 95% CI, 1.5 to 17.9; P =.007, respectively).

CONCLUSION

EA for EAAR is feasible in a high percentage of patients in whom it is attempted, and it ensures a technical outcome comparable with that of patients undergoing EAAR with GA. Successful completion of EAAR with EA is associated with a short period of hospitalization.

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: where do we stand?

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms has evolved dramatically within the past few years. In light of the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with open surgical repair, endoluminal grafting offers therapeutic options to patients who are not surgical candidates because of comorbidities. With the development of bifurcated devices, more complex aneurysms may be treated by endovascular grafting. Although successful placement of endovascular grafts requires a pronounced learning curve, including appropriate patient selection, midterm results seem consistent with those of traditional open repair of aneurysms. This review describes the current indications, minimal requirements, different devices and associated techniques, and potential complications of endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Future aspects of endoluminal grafting are also discussed.

Complications in the endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a risk factor analysis

OBJECTIVES

to identify risk factors for complications following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

endovascular AAA exclusion was attempted in 64 patients. Patient characteristics, anatomic features of the aneurysm, operative technical aspects, and the experience of the teams were correlated with mortality, occurrence of endoleak, and other complications. Perioperative complications were graded following the recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee on reporting standards. For the assessment of correlation between risk factors and outcomes a logistic regression analysis was used.

RESULTS

complications were observed in 43% of the procedures and were classified as mild (24%), moderate (55%) or severe (21%). American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) risk class 3 or 4, and advanced age were independent risk factors for perioperative death and complications. Adjuvant procedures or overstenting of the renal arteries with the uncovered part of the stent were not associated with increased risk of complications. Nevertheless, in four of 24 overstented renal orifices, a renal infarction or ischaemia of the kidney was observed on a postoperative CT scan. Advanced experience was associated with less complications, less endoleaks, and shorter operating time.

CONCLUSIONS

high age and medical co-morbidity were associated with increased risk for perioperative complications and death. Additional perioperative procedures are usually well tolerated. With greater experience in endovascular AAA grafting the incidence of complications and endoleaks decreased.

Perigraft air, fever, and leukocytosis after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND

The postimplantation syndrome of fever and leukocytosis after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms has not been previously characterized and its etiology is not known.

METHODS

We studied the first 12 patients who underwent successful endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms with Dacron-covered stent-grafts, as part of an ongoing phase II clinical trial. Sepsis syndrome evaluations (physical examination, urinalysis, chest radiograph, urine cultures, and blood cultures) were performed for all patients with postoperative temperature (T) greater than 101.4 degrees F. Computed tomography scans of the abdomen were performed, as part of the clinical protocol, on postoperative days 2 and 30.

RESULTS

Fever (T > 101.4 degrees F) was seen in 8 of 12 (67%) patients (P < 05). An additional 2 of 12 (17%) patients had low-grade fevers (100.3 degrees F, 100.6 degrees F). Only 2 of 12 (17%) patients remained afebrile postoperatively. Leukocytosis with counts over 11,000 white blood cells (WBC)/dL was observed in 7 of 12 (58%) patients (P < 05). Sepsis evaluations failed to identify any source of infection in 11 of 12 (97%) patients. Computed tomography scan evidence of perigraft air was noted in 8 of 12 (67%) patients. All patients were afebrile, had normal white blood cell counts, and were discharged within 1 week postoperatively. There has been no evidence of graft infection after 1 to 6 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Fever and leukocytosis after stent-graft repair of aortic aneurysms does not represent evidence of systemic or graft infection and is not clearly related to nonspecific causes of postoperative fever and leukocytosis. Moreover, the finding of early postoperative perigraft air is not necessarily an indication of graft infection even when concurrently present with fever and leukocytosis.

The cost-effectiveness of endovascular repair versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A decision analysis model

PURPOSE

Endovascular repair (EVR) is a less-invasive method for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) as compared with open surgical repair (OSR). The potential benefits of EVR include increased patient acceptance, less resource utilization, and cost savings. This study was designed to determine whether the EVR of AAAs is a cost-effective alternative to OSR.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using a Markov decision analysis model to compute long-term survival rates in quality-adjusted life years and lifetime costs for a hypothetical cohort of patients who underwent either OSR or EVR. Probability estimates of the different outcomes of the two alternative strategies were made on the basis of a review of the literature. The average costs of (1) the immediate hospitalization ($16,016 for OSR, $20,083 for EVR), (2) the complications that resulted from each procedure, (3) the subsequent interventions, and (4) the surveillance protocol were determined on the basis of average resource utilization as reported in the literature and from our hospital's cost accounting system. Our measure of outcome was the cost-effectiveness ratio.

RESULTS

For our base-case analysis (70-year-old men with 5-cm AAAs), EVR was cost-effective with a cost-effectiveness ratio of $22,826-society usually is willing to pay for interventions with cost-effectiveness ratios of less than $60,000 (eg, cost-effectiveness ratios for coronary artery bypass grafting and dialysis are $9500 and $54,400, respectively). This conclusion did not vary significantly with increases in procedural costs for EVR (ie, if the cost of the endograft increased from $8000 to $12,000, EVR remained cost-effective with a cost-effectiveness ratio of $32,881). The cost-effectiveness of EVR was critically dependent on EVR producing a large reduction in the combined mortality and long-term morbidity rate (stroke, dialysis-dependent renal failure, major amputation, myocardial infarction) as compared with OSR (ie, a reduction in the combined mortality and long-term morbidity rate of OSR from 9.1% to 4.7% made EVR no longer cost-effective).

CONCLUSION

Despite the high cost of new technology and the need for close postoperative surveillance, EVR is a cost-effective alternative for the repair of AAAs. However, the cost-effectiveness of this new technology is critically dependent on its potential to reduce morbidity and mortality rates as compared with OSR. EVR may not be cost-effective in medical centers where OSR can be performed with low risk.

Should endovascular surgery lower the threshold for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms?

PURPOSE

Because endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is less invasive, some investigators have suggested that this increasingly popular technique should broaden the indications for elective AAA repair. The purpose of this study was to calculate quality-adjusted life expectancy rates after endovascular and open AAA repair and to estimate the optimal diameter for elective AAA repair in hypothetical cohorts of patients at average risk and at high risk.

METHODS

A Markov decision analysis model was used in this study. Assumptions were made on the basis of published reports and included the following: (1) the annual rupture rate is a continuous function of the AAA diameter (0% for <4 cm, 1% for 4.5 cm, 11% for 5.5 cm, and 26% for 6.5 cm); (2) the operative mortality rate is 1% for endovascular repair (excluding the risk of conversion to open repair) and 3.5% for open repair at age 70 years; and (3) immediate endovascular-to-open conversion risk is 5%, and late conversion rate is 1% per year. The main outcome measure in this study was the benefit of AAA repair in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The optimal threshold size (the AAA diameter at which elective repair maximizes benefit) was measured in centimeters.

RESULTS

The benefit of endovascular repair is consistently greater than that of open repair, but the additional benefit is small-0.1 to 0.4 QALYs. For men in average health with gradually enlarging AAAs with initial diameters of 4 cm, endovascular surgery reduces the optimal threshold diameter by very little: from 4.6 to 4.6 cm (no change) at age 60 years, from 4.8 to 4.7 cm at age 70 years, and from 5.1 to 4.9 cm at age 80 years. For older men in poor health, endovascular surgery reduces the optimal threshold diameter substantially (8.1 to 5.7 cm at age 80 years), but the benefit of repair in this population is small (0.2 QALYs).

CONCLUSION

For most patients, the indications for AAA repair are changed very little by the introduction of endovascular surgery. Only for older patients in poor health does endovascular surgery substantially lower the optimal threshold diameter for elective AAA repair.

Endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms: treatment of complications

PURPOSE

To evaluate the use of interventional procedures for treating complications following endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients (49 men; mean age 67.5 years) underwent endoluminal stent-graft repair of traumatic (n = 4) or arteriosclerotic (n = 51) aortic aneurysms in the thoracic (n = 3) or infrarenal (n = 52) aorta. Follow-up of therapeutic success included periodic clinical examination, angiography, and spiral computed tomography.

RESULTS

Discounting the 25 (45%) cases of postimplantation syndrome that did not require treatment, there were 22 complications observed in 20 (36%) patients over a mean 10-month follow-up (range 1 to 27). There were 2 transrenal endograft maldeployments, 1 case of twisted graft limbs, 2 access site problems (1 patient), 12 endoleaks (11 patients), 1 late graft limb thrombosis, 1 symptomatic internal iliac artery occlusion, 2 myocardial infarctions, and 1 transient psychosis. Seven (13%) patients did not undergo specific therapy, while 4 (7%) required operation (2 crossover bypass grafts, 1 suture revision, and 1 graft replacement). Among 9 (16%) patients treated with interventional techniques, 7 underwent percutaneous coil embolization for 8 endoleaks (7 successfully resolved). One late stent-graft disconnection required an additional stent-graft, and 1 of the 2 malpositioned endografts was repositioned. All patients remain alive with no increase in the diameter of the aneurysm in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Technical problems resulting from the endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms often respond to interventional treatment.

Experimental techniques and models in the study of the development and treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND

It is still unclear what initiates aneurysmal dilatation and what determines whether or not an aneurysm will continue to expand and rupture. Early detection and operative repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) still remains the only effective means of reducing the high mortality rate associated with the condition. Endovascular techniques are being developed in an attempt to reduce the mortality rate associated with elective repair. A variety of animal models and experimental techniques have been described in the investigation of the pathophysiology of AAA and in the development of improved endovascular surgical and pharmacological therapies. This article discusses these models and techniques, their advantages and some of the problems encountered in extrapolating experimental findings to the human condition.

METHODS

This review is based on a search of the Medline database from 1966 to March 1998 using recognized key words and text words. A further search was then conducted on references quoted within selected relevant publications.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Treatment of rodent aortas with intraluminal elastase or periaortic calcium chloride creates reproducible aneurysms that have certain similarities to the human pathology; such aneurysms have been favoured in the investigation of the pathophysiology of aneurysm expansion. However, these models lack several of the prominent features of the human lesion, such as atherosclerosis and intraluminal thrombosis. The development of gene knockout mice may lead to a more analogous aneurysm formation, with associated atherosclerosis. Many large animal models have been used in the development of endovascular techniques but, in general, these do not mimic the human pathophysiology and fail to predict medium- and long-term complications.

Endovascular grafting for abdominal aortic aneurysms

Despite the initial success of endovascular grafts in a very difficult patient population, many problems remain. These procedures are often time-consuming and quite complicated, requiring the close cooperation of an experienced team of vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists. Access may be difficult through occluded, stenotic, and tortuous vessels. Inadequate graft deployment may result in arterial rupture or graft migration, which could potentially lead to acute occlusion of the renal or iliac arteries. Occlusion of the inferior mesenteric artery may result in ischemic colitis. Also, endovascular grafts may fail to exclude an aneurysm from systemic arterial blood pressure, not protecting the patient against impending rupture, and embolization and thrombosis are ever-present dangers. Concerns have been raised regarding radiation exposure and intravenous contrast loads used during these procedures. Clearly, more experience must be gained and technologic advancements made before the use of these devices becomes commonplace, something that may not be too far off in the future.