The National Immunization Survey: information for action

How complete are immunization registries? The Philadelphia story

OBJECTIVE

To assess accuracy and completeness of Philadelphia, Pa, registry data among children served by providers in areas at risk for underimmunization.

METHODS

Philadelphia's Department of Public Health selected a simple random sample of 45 children age 19-35 months (or all children age 19-35 months if there were <45 children in the practice) from each of 30 private practices receiving government-funded vaccine and located in zip codes where children are at risk for underimmunization. Chart and registry data were compared with determine the proportion of children missing from the registry and assess differences in immunization coverage.

RESULTS

Of 620 children reviewed, 567 (92%) were in the registry. Significant differences (P < .05) were observed in immunization coverage for 4 diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccinations, 3 polio vaccinations, 1 measles-mumps-rubella vaccination, and 3 Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccinations between the chart (80% coverage) and registry (62% coverage). Providers submitting electronic medical records or directly transferring electronic data to the registry had significantly more children in the registry and higher registry-reported immunization coverage than those whose data were entered from billing records or log forms. All practice types experienced difficulties in transferring complete data to the registry.

CONCLUSIONS

Although 92% of study children were in the registry, immunization coverage was significantly lower when registry data were compared with chart data. Because electronic medical records and direct electronic data transfer resulted in more complete registry data, these methods should be encouraged in linking providers with immunization registries.

Use of public school immunization data to determine community-level immunization coverage

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether immunization data collected on a child's entry into kindergarten, i.e., Chicago Public School Immunization Data (PSID), was comparable to coverage levels determined by the National Immunization Survey (NIS) and to use these data to identify community areas with consistently low immunization coverage.

METHODS

The Chicago Department of Public Health obtained four years of PSID (2000-2003); these data included demographic information, home address, and immunization records. Coverage levels were determined in two ways: (1) one dose of measles-containing vaccine (MCV) and (2) four doses of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine, three doses of poliovirus vaccine, and one dose of measles-containing vaccine (the 4:3:1 series), stratified by racial/ethnic group; these levels were compared to NIS estimates for the respective time periods. We used geographic information system software to illustrate variations in coverage levels between distinct community areas within Chicago.

RESULTS

Year 2000 MCV coverage levels determined from PSID closely approximated NIS estimates (84.6% vs. 87.2% +/- 4.6%, respectively). MCV coverage levels determined by race/ethnicity from PSID were within the 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all racial categories (white, 89.5% vs. 92.2% +/- 6.4%; black, 79.0% vs. 83.5% +/- 9.4%; Hispanic, 89.5% vs. 87.5% +/- 5.8%). Comparison of PSID and NIS 4:3:1 coverage levels revealed similar findings. For each study year, PSID identified 12 community areas with consistently low MCV coverage levels, i.e., < 80%.

CONCLUSIONS

PSID closely approximated NIS coverage estimates for MCV and 4:3:1 immunization. These methods can be used by state and city health departments to identify and direct resources to communities at greatest need.

Immunization coverage levels among 19- to 35-month-old children in 4 diverse, medically underserved areas of the United States

BACKGROUND

The National Immunization Survey demonstrates that national immunization coverage in 2002 remained near the all-time highs achieved in 2000. However, that survey cannot detect whether coverage is uniformly high within relatively small areas or populations. The measles resurgence in the early 1990s revealed that coverage was low in some areas, particularly among inner-city children from racial and ethnic minority groups. Today, identifying areas with low childhood-vaccination coverage remains important, particularly if these areas are at risk for the introduction of disease. In 1995, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention launched a congressionally mandated demonstrated project now called the Childhood Immunization Demonstration project of Community Health Networks. This mandate specified an assessment to determine whether a network of primary care providers affiliated with university teaching hospitals could assume a public health responsibility for raising immunization levels among preschoolers in medically underserved communities. Communities with federally designated health professional shortage areas were invited to submit proposals, and 4 were selected: Detroit, MI, New York, NY, San Diego, CA, and rural Colorado.

OBJECTIVES

To measure immunization coverage among preschool children in the 4 selected medically underserved areas and determine predictors of coverage levels.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Surveys in the 4 areas were based on stratified cluster probability sample designs in which clusters of dwelling units were selected and all households in selected clusters were screened for the presence of children aged 12 to 35 months. Immunization histories were obtained from parents and providers for these children. For each age-eligible child, the information collected on utilization of immunization health services included a listing of all clinics or offices ever used for the child's well-child care and/or for obtaining immunizations. Information was also collected on whether the child currently had health insurance (public and/or private) and whether the child had a medical home. A child was classified as having a medical home if the survey respondent reported a source of well care that was the same as the source of sick care and that this place was not an emergency department.

PARTICIPANTS

Children 12 to 35 months of age in Detroit, New York, San Diego, and rural Colorado.

OUTCOME MEASURE

Community-wide up-to-date (UTD) immunization coverage levels at 19 to 35 months of age, defined as receipt of 4 doses of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine, 3 doses of poliovirus vaccine, 1 dose of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine, 3 doses of Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine, and 3 doses of hepatitis B vaccine (the 4:3:1:3:3 series).

ANALYSIS

We examined the association between coverage level and independent variables and performed chi2 and t tests to determine whether differences observed within and between groups and sites were significant.

RESULTS

The overall response rate for eligible children ranged from 79.4% to 88.1%. Coverage levels for most individual vaccines were >90% in all sites except Detroit. Coverage for the 4:3:1:3:3 series was significantly higher for children in New York (84%) and San Diego (86%) than for children in Detroit (66%) and rural Colorado (75%). Demographic risk factors related to UTD immunization status varied by site. Although differences in coverage levels by ethnicity varied by site, differences were not significant. In Colorado and New York, coverage was slightly lower among Hispanic than white children (71% vs 76% and 83% vs 91%, respectively). In San Diego, coverage was lower among whites, compared with Hispanics (76% vs 85%). Coverage was also lower for African American than white children only in New York (75% vs 91%). However, in San Diego and Colorado, children receiving their vaccinations from private providers had lower coverage levels than children receiving their vaccinations from other providers (78% vs 91% and 71% vs 57%, respectively). Ictively). In all 4 sites, children for whom respondents reported having an immunization card at the time of the interview were more likely to have higher series coverage levels than children for whom a parent-held card was not available. Also, children who were UTD at 3 months of age had significantly higher vaccination-series coverage levels than children who were not UTD at 3 months of age. In addition, the vaccination coverage was lower for children in Detroit whose parents reported problems accessing the health care system because lack of transportation (46%), compared with those who did not report such problems (65%); however, this difference did not reach significance (chi2 = 6.0). In Colorado, the small proportion of children in families without a phone had a lower vaccination coverage level (58%) than those in households with a phone (75%) (chi2 = 6.3). In all sites, children who were UTD at 3 months of age and had a parent-held vaccination card were more likely to be UTD at 19 to 35 months of age.

CONCLUSIONS

Preschoolers in these medically underserved areas were not at uniform risk for underimmunization. Because they were designated as health professional shortage areas, the 4 sites in this study were expected to have low immunization-coverage rates. However, this was not the case. In fact, coverage in 3 of the 4 areas was quite high compared with US national figures (73%); only Detroit had a much lower UTD rate (66%). Efforts are needed to improve methods to identify areas with low immunization coverage so that resources can be directed to places where interventions are needed. Our results reveal that an area's need for childhood immunization interventions is not well predicted by a low number of providers per capita. Other criteria must be developed to predict areas or populations with low immunization coverage. Understanding more about the characteristics of children/provider pairs for children who are UTD at 3 months and more about the role of parental hand-held cards, along with finding strategies to improve immunization delivery by providers in Vaccines for Children Program facilities, suggest potentially productive avenues for increasing and sustaining high coverage levels.

Counting the shots: a model for immunization screening and referral in nonmedical settings

BACKGROUND

Clinics of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) have become important partners in efforts to improve vaccination coverage in low income children. However, the time required to assess all antigens in each child's vaccination record may exceed the capacity of many of these clinics. Seeking a solution, experts recommended assessing up-to-date (UTD) status only for the diphtheria-tetanus-acellular-pertussis (DTaP) vaccine and treating this as a proxy measure for all vaccines in the childhood schedule. Whether this single vaccine screening method represents an acceptable alternative to the traditional multiple-vaccine method as a basis for improving overall immunization coverage levels in this vulnerable population has not been demonstrated.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the validity of the proposed simplified method for assessing immunization status in a nationally representative population of infants and children who had ever been enrolled in WIC before 35 months old.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional analysis of the 2000 National Immunization Survey representing children ages 3 to 24 months who had ever been enrolled in WIC. For the 6277 children in the study population, we compared personal records of completion status for DTaP with personal records of completion status for all immunizations appropriate for age in the combination 4:3:1:3 schedule to see which of the 2 (single vs multiple screening) methods would better predict the child's true (provider-reported) status for the 4:3:1:3 series. The main outcome measures were the comparative sensitivity, specificity, and overall test efficiency of the 2 methods in correctly identifying underimmunized WIC children.

RESULTS

Completion status for DTaP was less sensitive than completion status for all vaccinations in correctly identifying truly underimmunized children (sensitivity = 70% and 77%, respectively). However, it was more specific in correctly identifying children who were truly UTD for age (specificity = 86% and 82%, respectively). The 2 methods were essentially identical with respect to overall test efficiency (82% and 81% for DTaP assessment and assessment of all vaccines, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Given limited resources to do immunization screening and referral in nonmedical settings such as WIC, simplifying the process by using DTaP from the personal vaccination record as a proxy for the 4:3:1:3 series is a viable option. Loss in sensitivity may well be offset by gains in the capacity of WIC clinics to screen more children.

Do laws bring children in child care centers up to date for immunizations?

BACKGROUND

Pennsylvania state law requires licensed child care centers (CCCs) to document that each enrolled child is up to date (UTD) for routine immunizations within 60 days of enrollment. This study evaluates the law's impact on immunization coverage among children aged <or=59 months who attend CCCs in Philadelphia.

METHODS

Out of Philadelphia's 440 commercial CCCs, 75 were randomly selected. Of these, 9 had closed, 3 did not accept children aged <or=59 months, and 3 refused assessment. For the remaining 60 CCCs, vaccination dates were abstracted from CCC records for all enrolled children <or=59 months. For children not UTD for all vaccines according to CCC records, additional data were sought from Philadelphia's immunization registry, health care providers, and parents.

RESULTS

Records of 2847 children were assessed. According to CCC records, information from the immunization registry, vaccination providers, and parents, 71% of children aged 0-18 months, 77% of children 19-35 months, and 84% of children 36-59 months were UTD for their age for diphtheria, tetanus toxoids, and pertussis vaccine; polio; Haemophilus influenzae type b; and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines. No significant increase in immunization coverage levels was found between the date children enrolled in a CCC and 60 days later.

CONCLUSIONS

Up to one quarter of children <5 years of age enrolled in Philadelphia's CCCs are not UTD for immunizations, with children 0-18 months of age being most behind in their immunizations. Furthermore, many children do not receive vaccines within 60 days of enrollment. These low coverage levels combined with the potential exposures inherent in group care settings indicate that children in CCCs are at risk for contracting vaccine-preventable diseases.

African-American children are at risk of a measles outbreak in an inner-city community of Chicago, 2000

BACKGROUND

Since the measles resurgence of 1989-1991, which affected predominantly inner-city preschoolers, national vaccination rates have risen to record-high levels, but rates among inner-city, preschool-aged, African-American children lag behind national rates. The threat of measles importations from abroad exists and may be particularly important in large U.S. cities. To stop epidemic transmission, measles vaccination coverage should be at least 80%.

OBJECTIVE

To determine measles vaccination rates and predictors for having received a dose of measles-containing vaccine by age 19 to 35 months among children in an inner-city community of Chicago.

METHODS

We used a cross-sectional survey with probability proportional to size cluster sampling. Immunization histories from parent-held records and providers were combined to establish a complete vaccination history.

RESULTS

A total of 2545 households were contacted, and 170 included a resident child aged 12 to 35 months. Of these, 97% (N=165 children) agreed to participate. Immunization history from a parent or provider was not available for 20 children. Among children aged 19 to 35 months with available immunization histories, 74% received measles vaccine (n=100); of these, 84% received the vaccine as recommended at ages 12 to 15 months. However, when including children without immunization histories, measles coverage levels among children aged 19 to 35 months were 64% (n=114). Among children with records, predictors for receipt of measles vaccine by age 19 to 35 months were possessing a hand-held immunization card (odds ratio [OR]=16.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]=4.2-67.1); utilizing a public health department provider for a usual source of care (OR=8.9; 95% CI=1.6-47.2); and being up-to-date for vaccines at 3 months of age (OR=5.0; 95% CI=1.8-14.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Optimistically assuming that children without immunization histories are as well immunized as children with immunization histories, the measles vaccination rate among Englewood's children aged 19 to 35 months is too low to maintain immunity (74%). Measles coverage levels lagged behind coverage reported in a national survey in Chicago (86%) and the nation as a whole (92%). Efforts to raise and sustain coverage should be undertaken.