Public health interventions for melanoma. Prevention, early detection, and education

Epidemiological and clinical characterization of a population-based cohort of cutaneous malignant melanoma patients in the South Region of Portugal

An historical population-based cohort study was conducted aiming to estimate the incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma in the South Region of Portugal between Jan 2016 and June 2017; to clinically characterize the diagnosed individuals; to describe instituted treatment; and to estimate survival outcomes. Data were extracted from a cancer registry (ROR-Sul) covering 4,800,000 inhabitants (46% of the Portuguese population) and included a total of 789 individuals meeting eligibility criteria. The crude incidence rate (18 months) of melanoma was 13.36/100,000 inhabitants and the Age-Standardized Incidence Rate per 100,000 World population was 9.65/100,000 inhabitants. The most common histological subtypes identified were superficial extension, followed by malignant melanoma and nodular melanoma. Most cases were diagnosed in stage I (50.39%), equally distributed by sex and with a median age of 65 years. During the study period, 174 recurrence events were recorded (23.45%) and recurrence-free survival rate was significantly lower in more advanced stages. Patients had a two-fold risk of recurrence/death when in presence of ulcerated tumors [adjusted hazard ratio (adj HR) = 2.28; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40-3.70]. Overall survival rate at 3-years was 80.54% (95% CI 77.58-83.15), higher than previous national reports, and considerably higher for individuals diagnosed at earlier stages (p < 0.001). We have also identified differential survival outcomes in stages II-III explained by the uptake of sentinel lymph node biopsy. The epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of malignant melanoma patients studied are consistent with international literature. The incidence and rates observed suggests additional public health campaigns are needed to modify behaviours of the Portuguese population and thus reduce their risk.

High-fidelity detection, subtyping, and localization of five skin neoplasms using supervised and semi-supervised learning

Background

Skin cancers are the most common malignancies diagnosed worldwide. While the early detection and treatment of pre-cancerous and cancerous skin lesions can dramatically improve outcomes, factors such as a global shortage of pathologists, increased workloads, and high rates of diagnostic discordance underscore the need for techniques that improve pathology workflows. Although AI models are now being used to classify lesions from whole slide images (WSIs), diagnostic performance rarely surpasses that of expert pathologists.

Objectives

The objective of the present study was to create an AI model to detect and classify skin lesions with a higher degree of sensitivity than previously demonstrated, with potential to match and eventually surpass expert pathologists to improve clinical workflows.

Methods

We combined supervised learning (SL) with semi-supervised learning (SSL) to produce an end-to-end multi-level skin detection system that not only detects 5 main types of skin lesions with high sensitivity and specificity, but also subtypes, localizes, and provides margin status to evaluate the proximity of the lesion to non-epidermal margins. The Supervised Training Subset consisted of 2188 random WSIs collected by the PathologyWatch (PW) laboratory between 2013 and 2018, while the Weakly Supervised Subset consisted of 5161 WSIs from daily case specimens. The Validation Set consisted of 250 curated daily case WSIs obtained from the PW tissue archives and included 50 "mimickers". The Testing Set (3821 WSIs) was composed of non-curated daily case specimens collected from July 20, 2021 to August 20, 2021 from PW laboratories.

Results

The performance characteristics of our AI model (i.e., Mihm) were assessed retrospectively by running the Testing Set through the Mihm Evaluation Pipeline. Our results show that the sensitivity of Mihm in classifying melanocytic lesions, basal cell carcinoma, and atypical squamous lesions, verruca vulgaris, and seborrheic keratosis was 98.91% (95% CI: 98.27%, 99.55%), 97.24% (95% CI: 96.15%, 98.33%), 95.26% (95% CI: 93.79%, 96.73%), 93.50% (95% CI: 89.14%, 97.86%), and 86.91% (95% CI: 82.13%, 91.69%), respectively. Additionally, our multi-level (i.e., patch-level, ROI-level, and WSI-level) detection algorithm includes a qualitative feature that subtypes lesions, an AI overlay in the front-end digital display that localizes diagnostic ROIs, and reports on margin status by detecting overlap between lesions and non-epidermal tissue margins.

Conclusions

Our AI model, developed in collaboration with dermatopathologists, detects 5 skin lesion types with higher sensitivity than previously published AI models, and provides end users with information such as subtyping, localization, and margin status in a front-end digital display. Our end-to-end system has the potential to improve pathology workflows by increasing diagnostic accuracy, expediting the course of patient care, and ultimately improving patient outcomes.

A Two-Year Regional Program for the Early Detection of Cutaneous Melanoma

Background

A regional program for the early diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma involving general practitioners was effective in 1997–1998 in the Friuli Venezia Giulia region in Northern Italy. The aim of the 2-year program was to evaluate the role of a skin examination performed by general practitioners in people older than 18 years without known skin lesions and spontaneously presenting to their offices for any reason, with referral of suspect cases to a pre-identified regional dermatology or plastic surgery institution.

Methods

In the preparatory phase (late 1995 and 1996), all general practitioners operating in the Friuli Venezia Giulia region (n = 1,038) were asked to participate in the program. Support from all regional dermatology, pathology and plastic surgery institutions was obtained. Operational procedures for the management of referred people were defined, and educational meetings directed to general practitioners interested in the program were held. Skin examinations by general practitioners started at the end of 1996 and took place during 1997 and 1998. Subsequently, information was obtained from participating general practitioners and from pathology institutions about the number and thickness of diagnosed melanomas, as well as the number of diagnosed skin carcinomas and dysplastic nevi. In addition, the thickness distribution of all melanomas diagnosed in the Friuli Venezia Giulia region before and during the program was obtained.

Results

A total of 153 general practitioners participated in the program, but only 74 were active and assessable. A total of 11,040 skin examinations was performed by these 74 general practitioners (median, 75 per general practitioner). In all, 820 people (7.4%) were referred for dermatological evaluation (median, 8 per general practitioner). Among these 820 people, at least 38 melanomas (4.6% of referred cases) were detected (18 ≤1.5 mm, 11 >1.5 mm thick, unknown in 9). The dermatological examinations/diagnosed melanomas ratio was 21. In addition, 94 skin carcinomas and 50 dysplastic nevi were detected. At the regional level, the percentage of thin melanomas rose from 65.3% in 1995–96 to 72.2% in 1997–98 (P = 0.04), whereas the number of thick melanomas declined.

Conclusions

In our study, only a few general practitioners chose, in the absence of incentives, to participate in the study. However, the yield of melanomas, most of which were thin, was considerably high and the workload was acceptable. This compares favorably to experiences where dermatologists were involved directly without a filter work by general practitioners.

Impact of Melanoma Diagnosis on Sun-Awareness and Protection: Efficacy of Education Campaigns in a High-Risk Population

Background:

Malignant melanoma is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Sun-awareness campaigns increase public knowledge but may not translate into behavioral changes in practice, which is particularly alarming when reported for individuals in high-risk groups. In particular, patients diagnosed with melanoma are at increased risk of developing subsequent primary melanomas compared with the general population.

Objectives:

The study was undertaken (1) to assess whether patients with known risk factors for developing melanoma had been exposed to preventative campaign messages prior to their diagnosis, (2) to quantify whether the diagnosis of melanoma changed sun-related attitudes and behavior, and (3) to assess the adequacy of sun-related advice given to patients with melanoma, as well as their compliance with the advice.

Methods:

Using an anonymous questionnaire, 217 patients previously diagnosed with melanoma were interviewed on the source and frequency of received sun-related advice, as well as on their knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward sun protection before and after the diagnosis.

Results:

The number of patients who reported receiving sun-related advice after being diagnosed with melanoma increased by 36% (52% pre-vs. 88% postDiagnosis), with advice being given more frequently and more often by a physician (19% pre- vs. 49% postdiagnosis). Furthermore, sun-related attitudes and behavioral practices were positively altered. Yet, patients with known risk factors were not preferentially targeted for advice before their diagnosis.

Conclusions:

The diagnosis of melanoma leads to increased sunwareness and protection. While dermatologists should continue their efforts to promote and reinforce sun-awareness in patients with melanoma, additional emphasis on preventative targeting of high-risk individuals would be of marked benefit in decreasing the overall incidence of melanoma. Non-dermatologists, such as family physicians, can be key players in this preventative campign, and can be educated to recognize and educate patients at risk, as well as direct them to be followed under dermatology care.

Priorities and challenges for skin cancer prevention in Europe: an expert survey

The incidence, mortality, and survival rates of melanoma vary significantly across Europe, likely related to persistent inequalities between European countries in the areas of skin cancer early detection, case registration, and prevention. To enhance the planning of prevention strategies for skin cancer in Europe, we solicited the direct opinion of European experts in the field of dermato-oncology on the main obstacles, needs, and priorities for the reduction of the skin cancer burden on this continent. We surveyed European dermatologists with leading positions in European and international organizations active in skin cancer prevention by means of written, single-choice and multiple-choice questionnaires. Fifty-two dermatologists from 32 European countries completed the survey (response rate 80%). Fewer respondents in Eastern Europe compared with Western Europe reported the presence of governmental (12 vs. 46%) or nongovernmental (35 vs. 65%) initiatives for skin cancer prevention. Most respondents in Eastern (73%) and Western Europe (69%) reported the existence of national cancer registries, but the confidence in the accuracy of melanoma registration was low. Public and professional education for early detection were top priorities for skin cancer campaigns across Europe and the perceived obstacles were similar in both regions: the lack of a national program of public education, insufficient public authority initiatives, and insufficient training of physicians on skin cancer. Our survey highlighted several areas requiring intervention for skin cancer prevention and found that the main issues and obstacles appear to be similar across Europe, creating the premise for coordinated, pan-European action.

Sun-protective behaviors in populations at high risk for skin cancer

Over 3 million new cases of skin cancer are diagnosed in the US annually. Melanoma, a subtype of skin cancer that can be fatal if the disease is not detected and treated at an early stage, is the most common cancer for those aged 25–29 years and the second most common cancer in adolescents and young adults aged 15–29 years. The primary carcinogen for the genesis of skin cancers is ultraviolet light from solar radiation and tanning beds. In spite of massive health campaigns to raise public awareness on ultraviolet radiation, sun-protective practices still fall behind. A plausible explanation is the lack of behavioral change in the populations at risk; in this review article, we examine sun-protective behavior in the four high-risk skin cancer groups: skin cancer survivors, individuals with a family history of melanoma, individuals with physical characteristics associated with skin cancer risk, and organ transplantation patients. Findings in the literature demonstrate that increased knowledge and awareness does not consequently translate into behavioral changes in practice. Behavior can differ as a result of different attitudes and beliefs, depending on the population at risk. Thus, intervention should be tailored to the population targeted. A multidisciplinary health team providing consultation and education is required to influence these much needed changes.

Recent skin self-examination and doctor visits in relation to melanoma risk and tumour depth

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the potential benefit of skin self-examination for melanoma prevention and early detection.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether skin self-examination is associated with reduced melanoma risk, self-detection of tumours, and reduced risk of deeper melanomas.

METHODS

We used data from a population-based case-control study (423 cases, 678 controls) to assess recent skin self-examination in relation to self-detection, melanoma risk and tumour depth ( ≤1 mm; > 1 mm). Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) for associations of interest.

RESULTS

Skin self-examination conducted 1-11 times during a recent year was associated with a possible decrease in melanoma risk (OR 0·74; 95% CI 0·54-1·02). Melanoma risk was decreased for those who conducted skin self-examination and saw a doctor (OR 0·52; 95% CI 0·30-0·90). Among cases, those who examined their skin were twice as likely to self-detect the melanoma (OR 2·23; 95% CI 1·47-3·38), but self-detection was not associated with shallower tumours. Tumour depth was reduced for those who conducted skin self-examination 1-11 times during a recent year (OR 0·39; 95% CI 0·18-0·81), but was not influenced by seeing a doctor, or by conducting skin self-examination and seeing a doctor.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk of a deeper tumour and possibly risk of melanoma were reduced by skin self-examination 1-11 times annually. Melanoma risk was markedly reduced by skin self-examination coupled with a doctor visit. We cannot, however, exclude the possibility that our findings reflect bias or confounding. Additional studies are needed to elucidate the potential benefits of skin self-examination for melanoma prevention and early detection.

Melanoma detection in British Columbia, Canada

BACKGROUND

In several studies, delays in malignant melanoma (MM) diagnosis have been correlated with increased tumor thickness, increased morbidity, and increased mortality.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess how MM is detected in British Columbia, Canada, and to understand the role of patient education and other factors on diagnostic delays.

METHODS

A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 176 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed MM.

RESULTS

The total median delay was 4 months. There was no correlation between tumor thickness and delay times. Lesions found incidentally by physicians were less invasive (median Breslow thickness 0.59 vs 1.0 mm, P=.006) than those found by patients. The majority of patients had some knowledge of MM and recognized the importance of early detection. Nearly one fourth of respondents were unaware MM could develop from a melanocytic nevus. In general, MM knowledge did not affect total delay.

CONCLUSION

Patients in British Columbia, Canada, report relatively short delays in diagnosis of MM. Delays were not correlated with increased tumor thickness or with patient knowledge regarding melanoma before diagnosis.

Impact of Melanoma Diagnosis on Sun-Awareness and Protection: Efficacy of Education Campaigns in a High-Risk Population

BACKGROUND

Malignant melanoma is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Sun-awareness campaigns increase public knowledge but may not translate into behavioral changes in practice, which is particularly alarming when reported for individuals in high-risk groups. In particular, patients diagnosed with melanoma are at increased risk of developing subsequent primary melanomas compared with the general population.

OBJECTIVES

The study was undertaken (1) to assess whether patients with known risk factors for developing melanoma had been exposed to preventative campaign messages prior to their diagnosis, (2) to quantify whether the diagnosis of melanoma changed sun-related attitudes and behavior, and (3) to assess the adequacy of sun-related advice given to patients with melanoma, as well as their compliance with the advice.

METHODS

Using an anonymous questionnaire, 217 patients previously diagnosed with melanoma were interviewed on the source and frequency of received sun-related advice, as well as on their knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward sun protection before and after the diagnosis.

RESULTS

The number of patients who reported receiving sun-related advice after being diagnosed with melanoma increased by 36% (52% pre-vs. 88% postDiagnosis), with advice being given more frequently and more often by a physician (19% pre- vs. 49% postdiagnosis). Furthermore, sun-related attitudes and behavioral practices were positively altered. Yet, patients with known risk factors were not preferentially targeted for advice before their diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of melanoma leads to increased sun-awareness and protection. While dermatologists should continue their efforts to promote and reinforce sun-awareness in patients with melanoma, additional emphasis on preventative targeting of high-risk individuals would be of marked benefit in decreasing the overall incidence of melanoma. Non-dermatologists, such as family physicians, can be key players in this preventative campaign, and can be educated to recognize and educate patients at risk, as well as direct them to be followed under dermatology care.

Dermatoepidemiology

Dermatoepidemiology is an important emerging discipline in dermatology. This article reviews clinical and analytic epidemiology pertinent to reading, interpreting, and critically examining the literature, and presents an overview of evidence-based dermatology as a starting point for further study.

The association between counseling, sun protection, and early detection of skin cancer in middle-aged Israelis

BACKGROUND

Healthcare professionals' counseling is expected to prompt primary and secondary prevention of skin cancer. In this study, we evaluated the association between counseling on skin cancer prevention and early detection and the recommended behaviors in middle-aged people.

METHODS

A random national cross-sectional telephone survey of 793 Israeli residents, aged 45-75 years, was conducted. The interviewees reported healthcare professionals' counseling and self-reported behaviors associated with sun protection and early detection of skin cancer.

RESULTS

Counseling on sun protection was reported by less than 10% of respondents. The presence of self-reported skin-cancer risk factors was significantly associated both with sun protection counseling and behavior. However, there was no association between sun protection counseling and behavior in a regression model. The rate of counseling on self-skin examination among respondents with self-reported skin-cancer risk factors was 17%. Early detection behaviors were significantly associated with practitioner's counseling on this issue.

CONCLUSION

Healthcare professionals' counseling on secondary skin cancer prevention seems to have a greater impact on behaviors than primary prevention counseling in middle-aged people and calls for improvement of primary prevention by health care professionals.

Predictors of sun protection in northern Australian men with a history of nonmelanoma skin cancer

BACKGROUND

It is important to understand what predicts regular use of sun protection in men susceptible to skin cancer.

METHODS

A questionnaire survey of men with previous nonmelanoma skin cancer (n = 300) was conducted.

RESULTS

Participants who typically used sunscreen tended to be younger, have fewer excised skin lesions, work indoors, and have spent most of their life in the tropics. Predictors of wearing a long-sleeved shirt with a wide-brimmed hat were not enjoying sun exposure, not having barriers to using sun protection, having more skin lesions previously excised, working for a company with a mandatory policy of sun protection, attitudes that the benefits of a suntan do not outweigh the risks and that skin cancers cannot be easily treated, and age over 50.

CONCLUSIONS

Men who adequately protect themselves from the sun and who have better attitudes to sun exposure were more often those with a high level of negative experience with skin cancer. Therefore, the sun protection attitudes and behaviors of some men may only improve after significant sun damage. This study recommends that the use of appropriate sun protective clothing should be made mandatory for all who work outdoors in high-sun-exposure occupations.

Sun-related behaviors of outdoor working men with a history of non-melanoma skin cancer

The present study describes sun exposure and sun protection behaviors of northern Australian outdoor workers with previous non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). In 1999 a cross-sectional study of northern Australian men with previous NMSC was conducted by self-administered questionnaire. Compared to other men, outdoor workers spent more time in the sun on average working days and days off (P < 0.0001, respectively), and outdoor workers with sun-sensitive skin reported that more skin lesions had been removed (P = 0.0461). The workplace did not reinforce sun-safe practices of 36.8% of workers who spent half their time or more outdoors. Sun-protective behaviors were not different between in- and outdoor workers. Outdoor workers experienced high levels of sun exposure, however, sun-protective behavior was similar to other workers. Workplaces should be targeted to reinforce sun-safe policies.

Sunburn prevalence among adults in the United States, 1999

BACKGROUND

Exposure to high levels of sunlight, such as a sunburn, is a strong determinant of melanoma risk.

METHODS

To describe statewide and U.S. estimates of sunburn prevalence in the United States and determine demographic and behavioral predictors of sunburn, we analyzed data from the 1999 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a population-based telephone survey conducted in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.

RESULTS

Of 156,354 adults aged > or =18 years, 31.7% (95% confidence interval, 31.3%-32.1%) reported a sunburn in the past year; of adults aged 18 to 29 years, 57.5% reported such a sunburn. Reporting was highest among white, non-Hispanic males (44.1%), followed by white non-Hispanic females (35.3%), and lowest among black non-Hispanic males and females (5.1% and 5.3%, respectively). Statewide period prevalence of sunburn among whites was highest (>45%) in Wisconsin, Utah, Wyoming, Washington, DC, and Indiana, and lowest (<30%) in Puerto Rico, Arizona, Tennessee, Oklahoma, and New York.

CONCLUSIONS

Nationwide and statewide skin cancer prevention efforts should target young adults. Periodic monitoring of sunburn is important in evaluating the effectiveness of those efforts.

Effect of a school-based sun-protection intervention on the development of melanocytic nevi in children

"Kidskin" was a 5-year (1995-1999), school-based intervention trial among first-grade children in Perth, Western Australia. It aimed to assess whether a sun-protection intervention could protect against nevus development on the trunk, face, and arms. Included were a control group, a "moderate intervention" group, and a "high intervention" group. Control schools taught the standard health curriculum, while intervention schools received a specially designed sun-protection curriculum over 4 years. The high intervention group also received program materials over summer vacations when sun exposure was likely to be highest and were offered low-cost sun-protective swimwear. After adjustment for baseline nevus counts and potential confounding, nevus counts on all body sites were slightly lower in both intervention groups relative to the control group at follow-up, although the differences were not statistically significant and the high intervention was no more protective. Children in the moderate and high intervention groups, respectively, had fewer nevi on the back (6%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0, 12; 4%, 95% CI: -3, 11), chest (boys) (5%, 95% CI: -4, 13; 3%, 95% CI: -8, 14), face (11%, 95% CI: 0, 21; 9%, 95% CI: -6, 21), and arms (8%, 95% CI: -1, 17; 3%, 95% CI: -10, 14).

Parental knowledge and practice of primary skin cancer prevention: gaps and solutions

Over the past two decades there have been significant efforts in the United States to heighten awareness about skin cancer. Our goal was to assess parental knowledge, practice, and source of information about sun protection for their children. A questionnaire was administered to 158 parents of children at a dermatology clinic and 96 parents of children at a pediatric clinic (n=254). The survey included four parts: demographics, knowledge about skin cancer, sun protection practices, and sources of sun protection information. The mean knowledge score was 61% correct. Independent predictors of a higher score were fewer children and being a health care or other professional (p < 0.03). Independent predictors of parental sunscreen use were higher knowledge score, younger age, and fewer lifetime sunburns (p < 0.03); predictors of sunscreen use for children were higher knowledge score and fairer skin (p < 0.03). The top sources of sun protection information ranked by respondents were television and magazines; the top desired sources were primary care physicians and dermatologists. The knowledge results suggest the need for increased education about skin cancer prevention. Because the media is a major information source, it is important to ensure that messages about sun risks/protection are correct. The respondents' desire to learn more from primary care physicians emphasizes the need to educate physicians about sun protection.

Screening for skin cancer

CONTEXT

Malignant melanoma is often lethal, and its incidence in the United States has increased rapidly over the past 2 decades. Nonmelanoma skin cancer is seldom lethal, but, if advanced, can cause severe disfigurement and morbidity. Early detection and treatment of melanoma might reduce mortality, while early detection and treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancer might prevent major disfigurement and to a lesser extent prevent mortality. Current recommendations from professional societies regarding screening for skin cancer vary.

OBJECTIVE

To examine published data on the effectiveness of routine screening for skin cancer by a primary care provider, as part of an assessment for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

DATA SOURCES

We searched the MEDLINE database for papers published between 1994 and June 1999, using search terms for screening, physical examination, morbidity, and skin neoplasms. For information on accuracy of screening tests, we used the search terms sensitivity and specificity. We identified the most important studies from before 1994 from the Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, second edition, and from high-quality reviews. We used reference lists and expert recommendations to locate additional articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers independently reviewed a subset of 500 abstracts. Once consistency was established, the remainder were reviewed by one reviewer. We included studies if they contained data on yield of screening, screening tests, risk factors, risk assessment, effectiveness of early detection, or cost effectiveness.

DATA EXTRACTION

We abstracted the following descriptive information from full-text published studies of screening and recorded it in an electronic database: type of screening study, study design, setting, population, patient recruitment, screening test description, examiner, advertising targeted at high-risk groups or not targeted, reported risk factors of participants, and procedure for referrals. We also abstracted the yield of screening data including probabilities and numbers of referrals, types of suspected skin cancers, biopsies, confirmed skin cancers, and stages and thickness of skin cancers. For studies that reported test performance, we recorded the definition of a suspicious lesion, the "gold-standard" determination of disease, and the number of true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative test results. When possible, positive predictive values, likelihood ratios, sensitivity, and specificity were recorded.

DATA SYNTHESIS

No randomized or case-control studies have been done that demonstrate that routine screening for melanoma by primary care providers reduces morbidity or mortality. Basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma are very common, but detection and treatment in the absence of formal screening are almost always curative. No controlled studies have shown that formal screening programs will improve this already high cure rate. While the efficacy of screening has not been established, the screening procedures themselves are noninvasive, and the follow-up test, skin biopsy, has low morbidity. Five studies from mass screening programs reported the accuracy of skin examination as a screening test. One of these, a prospective study, tracked patients with negative results to determine the number of patients with false-negative results. In this study, the sensitivity of screening for skin cancer was 94% and specificity was 98%. Several recent case-control studies confirm earlier evidence that risk of melanoma rises with the presence of atypical moles and/or many common moles. One well-done prospective study demonstrated that risk assessment by limited physical exam identified a relatively small (<10%) group of primary care patients for more thorough evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of the evidence addressing the accuracy of routine screening by primary care providers for early detection of melanoma or nonmelanoma skin cancer ranged from poor to fair. We found no studies that assessed the effectiveness of periodic skin examination by a clinician in reducing melanoma mortality. Both self-assessment of risk factors or clinician examination can classify a small proportion of patients as at highest risk for melanoma. Skin cancer screening, perhaps using a risk-assessment technique to identify high-risk patients who are seeing a physician for other reasons, merits additional study as a strategy to address the excess burden of disease in older adults.