HBsAg Quantification in Clinical Practice

Large spontaneous HBV DNA fluctuations and potential usefulness of a single-point measurement of combined HBV DNA and quantitative HBsAg for the exclusion of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: A prospective Tunisian cohort study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM

During the natural course of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB), fluctuations in hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels are often observed, making the classification of patients difficult. We aimed to describe spontaneous short-term HBV DNA level fluctuations and to assess the usefulness of qHBsAg in Tunisian patients with HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included 174 treatment-naive Tunisian patients with HBeAg-negative chronic HBeAg-negative HBV infection. A prospective 1-year follow-up was conducted with serial determinations of HBV DNA, ALT levels, and qHBsAg. The patients were classified into three groups: inactive carriers (G1), patients with negative HBeAg CHB (G2), and patients with an "indeterminate state" (G3). For the latter group, a liver biopsy was indicated.

RESULTS

Only genotype D was detected. During follow-up, 21.6% and 19.5% of patients with a low initial (<2,000 IU/ml) and intermediate viral load (2,000-20,000 IU/ml) experienced a subsequent increase in their HBV DNA levels above 2,000 and 20,000 IU/ml, respectively. Significant variations in viral load were observed in 61.1% of patients at 6-month intervals. Among the 174 patients, 89 (51.1%) belonged to G1, 33 (19%) to G2, and 52 (29.9%) to G3. Fourteen patients have undergone a liver biopsy, of whom seven showed moderate to severe liver disease. Combination of HBV DNA < 2,000 IU/ml and qHBsAg < 832 IU/ml excluded CHB in 98.4% of cases. A cutoff point for qHBsAg < 100 IU/ml associated with an annual decline of > 0.5 log 10 IU/ml is a good predictor marker of functional cure for hepatitis B.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the large short-term fluctuations in HBV DNA in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic HBeAg-negative HBV infection with genotype D. Thus, using the cutoff value of 832 for qHBsAg combined with that of 2,000 for HBV DNA makes it possible to exclude CHB for most patients.

Evaluation and Determination of Quantitative Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Diagnostic Performance in Chronic Hepatitis B Virus-Infected Patients

Background Hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV-DNA) assessment is recommended for diagnosing and monitoring chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) estimation adjunct to HBV-DNA is vital for assessing HBV chronicity and therapeutic prognosis. This study aimed to estimate the qHBsAg and compare its diagnostic performance with that of the HBV-DNA levels in CHB patients from Bangladesh. Methodology A total of 148 CHB patients were enrolled in this study. qHBsAg and hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) were estimated using chemiluminescent and enzyme immunoassays, respectively, and HBV-DNA was quantified using real-time polymerase chain reaction. The parameters and diagnostic performances were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results The overall levels (mean ± SD) of qHBsAg, HBV-DNA, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) among the total population (n = 148) were 3.45 ± 0.80 log₁₀ IU/mL, 4.40 ± 2.44 log₁₀ IU/mL, and 86.17 ± 39.06 IU/L, respectively. Significant differences were observed in the levels of both qHBsAg (p = 0.004) and HBV-DNA (p < 0.0001) in cases with HBeAg positivity. qHBsAg levels showed a weak positive correlation with the levels of HBV-DNA and ALT in HBeAg-positive CHB patients, but no such relationship was observed in HBeAg-negative CHB patients. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve for the qHBsAg level to distinguish high HBV-DNA levels (>5 log₁₀ IU/mL) was 0.653 (p = 0.002), which indicated an acceptable diagnostic performance. The best cut-off of qHBsAg for predicting high HBV-DNA levels was 3.469 log₁₀ IU/mL. Conclusions Our results indicated that qHBsAg might be a useful marker for monitoring HBV-DNA in CHB patients throughout treatment and follow-up.

Low-dose anti-hepatitis B immunoglobulin regimen as prophylaxis for hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Combination of anti-hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) and antiviral nucleotide/nucleoside is the most common regimen for prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence. However, what the optimal regimen is for HBIg administration remains subject to debate.

METHODS

Two hundred and thirty-two HBV patients who had liver transplantation were included in this study. According to the decline rate of HBIg, the patients were divided into quick (group Q, n = 95) and slow decline groups (group S, n = 137). Quick HBIg decline was defined as anti-HBs titer <200 IU/mL at postoperative month (POM) 1, when 24 000 IU of HBIg was given perioperatively. HBV recurrence was defined as reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg).

RESULTS

After a mean (range) follow-up of 42.2 (24.1-76.8) months, the HBV recurrence rate was 12.1% for all 232 patients. The median (interquartile) HBIg titer was 96.2 (41.0-158.0) IU in group Q patients, compared to 418.0 (298.8-692.8) IU in group S patients at POM 1 (P < .001). For the patients in group Q, 18 patients (18.9%) had HBV recurrence; this was higher than the 10 (7.3%) patients in group S (P = .013). Multivariate analysis showed that quick HBIg decline and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence were the risk factors for HBV recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative low-dose HBIg and antiviral nucleotide/nucleoside can effectively prevent HBV recurrence in patients with slow HBIg decline. For patients with quick HBIg decline, the idealized HBIg and antiviral agent regimen should be adjusted to establish an effective regimen as prophylaxis against HBV recurrence.

THE SERUMAL CONCENTRATION OF HBSAG IN PATIETS WITH CHB/HIV CO-INFECTION COMPARING WITH CHB MONO-INFECTION IN THE DIFFERENT PHASES OF NATURAL COURSE OF CHRONIC HEPATITIS В

The prevalence and inclination to chronization of viral hepatitis B is 3 – 5 times higher in patients with HIV-infection than in HIV-negative ones. The natural clinical course of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in patients with HIV has the features, connected with immune suppression and mutual influence of viruses. The quantitative determination of HBsAg allows the more precise monitoring of the natural course and the dynamics of treatment of patients with CHB but these features are little studied in patients with co-infection CHB/HIV. In the work was presented the comparative analysis of the results of quantitative determination of the serumal HBsAg in 59 Patients with co-infection CHB/HIV and 60 ones with chronic hepatitis. At the study it was established, that in patients with CHB/HIV co-infection were observed the reliably higher qHBsAg levels than in HIV-negative ones both in whole and in each CHB phase that depends on the immune suppression degree and DNA level of hepatitis B virus.