Evolution of antimicrobial prophylaxis in cardiovascular surgery

The Impact of EBM-Manufactured Ti6Al4V ELI Alloy Surface Modifications on Cytotoxicity toward Eukaryotic Cells and Microbial Biofilm Formation

Electron beam melting (EBM) is an additive manufacturing technique, which allows forming customized implants that perfectly fit the loss of the anatomical structure of bone. Implantation efficiency depends not only on the implant's functional or mechanical properties but also on its surface properties, which are of great importance with regard to such biological processes as bone regeneration or microbial contamination. This work presents the impact of surface modifications (mechanical polishing, sandblasting, and acid-polishing) of EBM-produced Ti6Al4V ELI implants on essential biological parameters. These include wettability, cytotoxicity toward fibroblast and osteoblast cell line, and ability to form biofilm by Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans. Obtained results indicated that all prepared surfaces exhibited hydrophilic character and the highest changes of wettability were obtained by chemical modification. All implants displayed no cytotoxicity against osteoblast and fibroblast cell lines regardless of the modification type. In turn, the quantitative microbiological tests and visualization of microbial biofilm by means of electron microscopy showed that type of implant's modification correlated with the species-specific ability of microbes to form biofilm on it. Thus, the results of the presented study confirm the relationship between such technological aspects as surface modification and biological properties. The provided data are useful with regard to applications of the EBM technology and present a significant step towards personalized, customized implantology practice.

Prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis following cardiac device procedures increases preventable harm: insights from the VA CART program

BACKGROUND

The rate of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is increasing coincident with an increase in the number of device procedures. Preprocedural antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces CIED infections; however, there is no evidence that prolonged postprocedural antimicrobials additionally reduce risk. Thus, we sought to quantify the harms associated with this approach.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the association between Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), acute kidney injury (AKI) and receipt of prolonged postprocedural antimicrobials.

METHODS

CIED procedures entered into the VA Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Electrophysiology (CART-EP) database during fiscal years 2008-2016 were included. The primary outcome was 90-day incidence of CDI and the secondary outcome was the 7-day incidence of AKI. The primary exposure measure was duration of postprocedural antimicrobial therapy. Associations were measured using Cox-proportional hazards and binomial regression.

RESULTS

Prolonged postprocedural antimicrobial therapy was identified following 3,331 of 6,497 CIED procedures (51.3%), and the median duration of prophylaxis was 5 days. Prolonged postprocedural antimicrobial use was associated with increased risk of CDI (hazard ratio [HR], 2.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54-5.46). Of the 27 patients who developed CDI, 11 subsequently died. Postprocedural antimicrobial use with ≥2 antimicrobials was associated with an increased risk of AKI (OR, 4.16; 95% CI, 2.50-6.90). The impact was particularly significant when one of the dual agents prescribed was vancomycin (adjusted OR, 8.41; 95% CI, 5.53-12.79).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis following CIED procedures increases preventable harm; this practice should be discouraged in procedural settings such as the cardiac electrophysiology laboratory.

Real-world effectiveness of infection prevention interventions for reducing procedure-related cardiac device infections: Insights from the veterans affairs clinical assessment reporting and tracking program

OBJECTIVE

To measure the association between receipt of specific infection prevention interventions and procedure-related cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort with manually reviewed infection status.

SETTING

Setting: National, multicenter Veterans Health Administration (VA) cohort.

PARTICIPANTS

Sampling of procedures entered into the VA Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking-Electrophysiology (CART-EP) database from fiscal years 2008 through 2015.

METHODS

A sample of procedures entered into the CART-EP database underwent manual review for occurrence of CIED infection and other clinical/procedural variables. The primary outcome was 6-month incidence of CIED infection. Measures of association were calculated using multivariable generalized estimating equations logistic regression.

RESULTS

We identified 101 procedure-related CIED infections among 2,098 procedures (4.8% of reviewed sample). Factors associated with increased odds of infections included (1) wound complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 8.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.16-24.20), (2) revisions including generator changes (aOR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.59-3.63), (3) an elevated international normalized ratio (INR) >1.5 (aOR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.12-2.18), and (4) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus colonization (aOR, 9.56; 95% CI, 1.55-27.77). Clinically effective prevention interventions included preprocedural skin cleaning with chlorhexidine versus other topical agents (aOR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.76) and receipt of β-lactam antimicrobial prophylaxis versus vancomycin (aOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.96). The use of mesh pockets and continuation of antimicrobial prophylaxis after skin closure were not associated with reduced infection risk.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings regarding the real-world clinical effectiveness of different prevention strategies can be applied to the development of evidence-based protocols and infection prevention guidelines specific to the electrophysiology laboratory.

Impact of standardization of antimicrobial prophylaxis duration in pediatric cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVES

The optimal duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis following pediatric cardiac surgery is still debated. Adult studies suggest that shorter durations are adequate, but there is a paucity of data on pediatric patients.

METHODS

This quasi-experimental study reviewed the charts of patients 18 years and younger who underwent cardiac surgery from April 2011 to November 2014 at a single institution. Starting in April 2013, a protocol was implemented to limit antimicrobial prophylaxis to 48 hours following sternal closure. Two analyses were performed: (1) identification of risk factors for surgical site infections from the entire cohort, and (2) comparison of surgical site infection incidence in the pre- and postprotocol groups.

RESULTS

In the entire cohort, delayed sternal closure (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 5.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-17.9) and younger age (adjusted OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-3.8) were associated with incidence of surgical site infection. Following the protocol change, duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis decreased from 4.2 ± 2.7 to 1.9 ± 1.3 days (P < .0001). After adjusting for age and delayed sternal closure, the postprotocol group had an adjusted OR of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.32-3.00) for occurrence of surgical site infection. Other outcomes were not altered following the protocol change.

CONCLUSIONS

Restricting antimicrobial prophylaxis to 48 hours following pediatric cardiac surgery did not increase the incidence of surgical site infection at our institution. Further study is needed to validate this finding and to identify practices that reduce surgical site infections in those with delayed sternal closure.

Continuous Intraoperative Cefazolin Infusion May Reduce Surgical Site Infections During Cardiac Surgical Procedures: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to determine whether an institutional transition from intermittent to continuous dosing of intraoperative antibiotics in cardiac surgery affected surgical site infection (SSI) outcomes.

DESIGN

A retrospective chart review utilizing propensity matching.

SETTING

A single academic, tertiary care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

One thousand one hundred seventy-nine patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or cardiac valvular surgery between April 2013 and November 2014 who received perioperative cefazolin.

INTERVENTIONS

By method of cefazolin administration, patients were divided into an "intermittent-dosing" (ID) group and a "continuous-infusion" (CI) group.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of the 1,179 patients who underwent cardiac surgery during the study period, 1:1 propensity score matching yielded 399 patients in each group. Rates of diabetes (33.6% ID v 33.8% CI, p = 0.94), coronary artery bypass (62.3% v 61.4%, p = 0.66), and bilateral internal mammary artery harvesting (6.0% v 8.3%, p = 0.22) were similar between groups. SSIs occurred in more ID patients than CI patients (2.3% v 0.5%, p = 0.03). This difference was driven by decreases in extremity and conduit harvest site SSIs (1.8% v 0.3%, p = 0.03), as there were no episodes of mediastinitis, and superficial sternal SSI rates did not differ (0.5% v 0.3%, p = 0.56). There also were significantly fewer episodes of pneumonia in the CI group (6.0% v 2.3%, p = 0.008). Intensive care unit and total lengths of stay did not differ. Thirty-day mortality was 2.8% in both groups (p = 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

As compared to ID regimens, CI cefazolin infusion may reduce post-cardiac surgery infectious complications. Further study in larger patient populations is needed.

Ceftriaxone Prophylaxis in Abdominal, Cardiovascular, Thoracic, Orthopaedic, Neurosurgical and General Surgery: A Review of Practice 1996 - 2003

The microbiology, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of ceftriaxone prophylaxis were compared with those of alternative antimicrobial agents in abdominal, cardiovascular, thoracic, orthopaedic, neurosurgical and general surgical procedures published since 1996. Ceftriaxone was compared with cefazolin +/- metronidazole, cefoxitin, cefuroxime, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, cefepime + metronidazole, penicillins, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin/sulbactam, vancomycin and combined clindamycin/gentamicin. Ceftriaxone, used primarily as 'single shot prophylaxis', was at least as clinically effective if not better than the comparative single- and multiple-dose agents over the broad range of surgical procedures. Furthermore the overall cost of ceftriaxone prophylaxis has often been shown to be markedly less than comparators, despite the relatively high acquisition cost of ceftriaxoe, when factors other than acquisition cost were considered. Advances in surgical techniques, the changes in bacterial ecology in hospitals, the spread of bacterial resistance and the substantial increase in the surgical population at risk suggest that third generation cephalosporins, particularly ceftriaxone, should be taken into consideration for surgical prophylaxis.

Does duration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis matter in cardiac surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the efficacy of short-term (<24 hours) versus longer-term antibiotic prophylaxis (≥24 hours) in open heart surgery.

BACKGROUND

The optimal duration of antibiotic prophylaxis for adults undergoing cardiac surgery is unknown and guideline recommendations are inconsistent.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL for parallel-group randomized trials comparing any antibiotic prophylaxis administered for <24 hours to any antibiotic prophylaxis for ≥24 hours in adult patients undergoing open heart surgery. Reference lists of selected articles, clinical practice guidelines, review articles, and congress abstracts were searched. Study selection, data extraction and assessment of risk of bias were performed independently by 2 reviewers.

RESULTS

Of the 1338 citations identified by our search strategy, 12 studies involving 7893 patients were selected. Compared with short-term antibiotic prophylaxis, longer-term antibiotic prophylaxis reduced the risk of sternal surgical site infection (SSI) by 38% (risk ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-1.69, P = 0.002) and deep sternal SSI by 68% (risk ratio 1.68, 95% CI 1.12-2.53, P = 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in mortality, infections overall and adverse events. Eleven of the trials were at high risk for bias due to limitations in study design.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis of ≥24 hours may be more efficacious in preventing sternal SSIs in patients undergoing cardiac surgery compared to shorter regimens. The findings however are limited by the heterogeneity of antibiotic regimens used and the risk of bias in the published studies.

Non-compliance with recommendations for the practice of antibiotic prophylaxis and risk of surgical site infection: results of a multilevel analysis from the INCISO Surveillance Network

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine which surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) practices alter surgical site infection (SSI) risk.

METHODS

Data were collected during a 7 year surveillance period (2001-07) from volunteer surgery wards participating in the INCISO Surveillance Network in Northern France. Main SAP practices, i.e. antibiotic choice, timing of first dose and total SAP duration, were evaluated and compliance checked based on French recommendations. The study focused on selected procedures in digestive, orthopaedic, gynaecological and cardiovascular surgery, for which standard SAP is recommended. Multilevel logistic regression analysis (a two-level random effect model) was carried out to identify SAP-, patient- and procedure-specific factors associated with SSI.

RESULTS

Of 8029 patients who underwent the selected surgeries, 91.3% received SAP and 2.5% developed SSI. Among those receiving SAP, 83.3% received appropriate antibiotic agents and 76.6% had an optimal timing of administration. SAP duration was considered to be appropriate in 35.0%, too long (SAP unnecessarily prolonged) in 45.2% and too short (lack of intra-operative redosing when recommended) in 19.8%. In the multivariate analysis, a too-short SAP duration remained the only inappropriate practice associated with higher SSI risk (odds ratio = 1.8, 95% confidence interval: 1.14-2.81), after adjustment for surgery procedure group, the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System risk index, age and infection risk variability among hospitals. No significant relationships were observed between SSI and the other SAP parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

A too-short SAP duration was the most important SAP malpractice associated with an increased risk of SSI. Information directed at practitioners should be reinforced based on standard recommendations.

Prophylactic antibiotics in hip and knee arthroplasty

Prophylactic parenteral antibiotics have contributed to the present low rate of surgical site infections following hip and knee arthroplasty. Over the past decade, there has been a change in the pattern of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections from hospital-acquired to community-acquired. The findings of recent studies on screening programs to identify carriers of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus have been equivocal, with some studies showing that such programs reduce the rate of infections and others showing no effect on infection rates. Hospitals with antibiogram data that reveal high Staphylococcus resistance should consider use of vancomycin as a prophylactic antibiotic.

Duration of antibiotic prophylaxis for cardiac surgery: prospective observational study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of prolonging antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Prospective before-after cohort study. In 2004, cefazolin was given pre- and intraoperatively at 1g doses while in 2007 it was continued after surgery for 24h. All consecutive adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft, valve, and/or aortic operations during the study periods were included. The primary outcomes were deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) and mortality. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess risk factors for DSWI.

RESULTS

954 patients between 1/2004 and 12/2004 were compared to 424 patients between 1/2007 and 6/2007. In 2007, there were significantly more patients >60yrs., emergency and combined operations and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was higher compared to 2004 (8.53% vs. 6.92%, p=0.006). The rate of DSWI decreased non-significantly from 3.8% (36/954) in 2004 to 2.6% (11/424) in 2007, p=0.27. The adjusted odds ratio of the study period for DSWI was 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.70-1.13). There was no difference in 30-day (5.2% vs. 5.4%) or 6-month mortality (9.2% in both periods), despite increasing patients' risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis did not result in a significant decrease in DSWI. The value of prolonging antibiotic prophylaxis after cardiac operations should be further evaluated.

Incidence of postoperative infections in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery receiving antimicrobial prophylaxis with original and generic cefuroxime

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of post-operative infections in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery who received generic cefuroxime (gCFX) instead of original cefuroxime (oCFX) as antimicrobial prophylaxis.

METHODS

The study had two parts, a prospective and a retrospective one (4 weeks with oCFX followed by 4 weeks with gCFX in each part; total study duration of 16 weeks). The studied patient population was 618 consecutive adult patients who underwent on pump CABG surgery. Patients were divided into two groups according to type of formulation they received: 313 patients received oCFX and 305 gCFX.

RESULTS

Eight (2.5%) and 39 (12.8%) patients in the oCFX and gCFX group, respectively, developed postoperative infections (p<0.001). There were 6 (1.9%) surgical site infections in the oCFX group and 31 (10.1%) in the gCFX group (p<0.001). Bacteremia occurred in 2 (0.6%) patients in the oCFX group and in 8 (2.6%) patients in the gCFX group (p=0.1). In addition, septic shock occurred in 6 cases (2.0%, p=0.04) and multiple organ failure in another 4 patients (1.3%, p=0.1) in the gCFX group. The most common pathogens isolated were Gram-positive cocci in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed a higher incidence of postoperative infections in adult patients undergoing CABG surgery receiving gCFX compared to oCFX as antimicrobial prophylaxis. The findings of our study provide additional evidence regarding the problem of substandard drugs, in our case a formulation of a generic antibiotic, even in developed countries. ULTRAMINI-SUMMARY: The incidence of post-operative infections following CABG surgery was higher in adult patients receiving generic instead of original cefuroxime as antimicrobial prophylaxis. The findings of our study provide additional evidence regarding the problem of substandard drugs, in our case a formulation of a generic antibiotic, even in developed countries.

A System and Process Redesign to Improve Perioperative Antibiotic Administration

Surgical infection is a leading cause of patient injury, mortality, and excess health care costs. As part of a collaborative effort, we instituted three main focuses for perioperative antibiotic administration: appropriate selection of antibiotics, administration of antibiotics within 60 min before incision, and discontinuation of prophylactic antibiotics within 24 h of surgery. Anesthesiologists were identified as the practitioners most likely to accomplish the successful administration of antibiotics within 60 min before incision. Changes were made in ordering, documentation, and antibiotic preparation. Education was provided to all operating room staff at meetings and grand round presentations. Results were prominently displayed, and feedback was provided. The baseline appropriate antibiotic selection was 82% and is now 95%. The preintervention administration-incision time was 79 (range, 32-380) min, with 11% within the 60 min before incision. The administration-incision time is currently 19 (range, 0-95) min, and the number within 60 min is 95%. Before the institution of the process, the rate of surgical site infections was 3.8%, and is now approximately 1.4%. We describe our process used to improve antibiotic administration. During this time, the surgical site infection rate has been significantly reduced.

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Species in a Cardiac Surgical Intensive Care Unit: A 5-Year Experience

OBJECTIVES

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus is a growing problem in intensive care units (ICUs). The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus isolates in a cardiac surgical ICU over a 5-year period and to determine the risk factors and outcome of this condition.

METHODS

During the period from January 1998 to July 2003, the clinical data of all adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery in a university hospital were prospectively recorded in a database; the perioperative clinical variables and microbiologic data were studied by means of univariate and multivariate analysis in order to identify risk factors for the development of methicillin resistance and in-hospital death.

RESULTS

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species strains were isolated in 118 of 6,423 patients operated on during the study period (7.6 cases per 1,000 days of ICU stay), with a constant prevalence rate throughout the years. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species have been the most frequently isolated microorganisms in the authors' ICU; 75% of Staphylococcus aureus and 95% of coagulase-negative staphylococci were methicillin resistant. In-hospital mortality in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus-positive patients was 50.0% (59/118), whereas it was 1.7% (108/6305) in other patients (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species isolation was the single risk factor with the strongest association with in-hospital death (odds ratio, 8.5; 95% confidence interval 4.9-14.7). In the present series, there were no isolates of vancomycin-resistant species (Enterococcus species or Staphylococcus species).

CONCLUSIONS

Staphylococcus species represent the most frequently isolated microorganisms in the authors' ICU. In-hospital mortality in cardiac surgical patients is strongly correlated to the isolation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus.

Hospitals collaborate to decrease surgical site infections

BACKGROUND

Despite a large body of evidence describing care processes known to reduce the incidence of surgical site infections, many are underutilized in practice.

METHODS

Fifty-six hospitals volunteered to redesign their systems as part of the National Surgical Infection Prevention Collaborative, a 1-year demonstration project sponsored by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Each facility selected quality improvement objectives for a select group of surgical procedures and reported monthly clinical process measure data.

RESULTS

Forty-four hospitals reported data on 35,543 surgical cases. Hospitals improved in measures related to appropriate antimicrobial agent selection, timing, and duration; normothermia; oxygenation; euglycemia; and appropriate hair removal. The infection rate decreased 27%, from 2.3% to 1.7% in the first versus last 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The Collaborative demonstrated improvement in processes known to be associated with reduced risk of surgical site infections. Quality improvement organizations can be effective resources for quality improvement in the surgical arena.

Ceftriaxone versus Other Antibiotics for Surgical Prophylaxis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate possible differences in prophylaxis with ceftriaxone compared with other antimicrobial agents for surgical-site infections and remote infections such as respiratory tract infections (RTIs) and urinary tract infections (UTIs).

METHODS

The efficacy of ceftriaxone was compared with that of other antibiotics in the perioperative prophylaxis of local (surgical wound) and remote (RTIs and UTIs) infections in a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials published between 1984 and 2003. The analysis was based on a 2 x 2 contingency table with classification by treatment and number of infections obtained from individual studies.

RESULTS

Evaluations were performed on 48 studies, for a total of 17 565 patients. Overall, 406 patients (4.8%) in the ceftriaxone group and 525 (6.3%) in the comparator group developed a surgical-site infection (log odds ratio [OR] -0.30 [CI -0.50 to -0.13]; p < 0.0001). RTIs were observed in 292 (6.01%) patients in the ceftriaxone group and in 369 (7.6%) patients in the comparator group, (log OR -0.30 [CI -0.55 to -0.09]; p = 0.0013). UTIs were reported for 2.2% of the ceftriaxone prophylaxis patients compared with 3.74% of the comparator group patients (log OR -0.54 [CI -1.18 to -0.16]; p < 0.0001). Overall, in clean surgery 195 (5.1%) and 234 (6.2%) patients developed a surgical site infection in the ceftriaxone and comparator groups, respectively (log OR -0.22 [CI -0.51 to 0.01]; p = 0.0476). RTIs were prevented for all but 1.57% of patients in the ceftriaxone group and 2.62% of patients in the comparator group (p = 0.01) in clean surgery, and for 9.54% of the ceftriaxone group versus 11.6% of the comparator group (p = 0.01) in clean-contaminated surgery. While results observed in clean surgery did not show statistically significant superiority of ceftriaxone in preventing UTI insurgence (log OR -0.21 [CI 0.0-0.65]; p = 0.7702), this was clearly shown in the clean-contaminated surgery. In fact, 4.47% of patients in the ceftriaxone group versus 7.52% of patients in the comparator group developed a UTI (log OR -0.56 [CI -1.25 to -0.16]; p < 0.0001). Adverse events were observed in a similar proportion in the ceftriaxone prophylaxis and the comparator groups (0.35% and 0.23%, respectively). Duration of prophylaxis did not influence outcome of infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis showed that ceftriaxone is statistically superior to other antibiotics in preventing both local and remote postoperative infections.

Bio-ecological control of perioperative and ITU morbidity

BACKGROUND

Perioperative and intensive therapy unit (ITU) morbidity and mortality has remained unchanged during the past several decades, and this at an unacceptably high level. It is most likely, in the EU countries annually, that more than 1 million people suffer severe sepsis and some 300,000 die. Pharmaceutical attempts at prevention and treatment have, despite extensive efforts, hitherto failed to improve outcome more significantly. Much supports the fact that sepsis and its severe consequences are results of a malfunctioning innate immune system, impaired by both lifestyle and disease. A series of mostly simple measures to prevent further deterioration of the immune system, and to boost it, is recommended. Among the measures recommended are some modifications of surgical and postoperative management: restricted use of antibiotics, attempts made to maintain salivation and GI secretions, omission of prophylactic gastric decompression, postoperative drainage and preoperative bowel preparation, restricted use of stored blood, avoidance of overload with nutrients, uninterrupted enteral nutrition but also tight blood glucose control, supply of antioxidants, administration of prebiotic fibre and probiotic lactic acid bacteria. Nutritional control of postoperative morbidity includes use of so-called synbiotics, e.g. a combination of bioactive lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and bioactive plant fibres.

RESULTS

Dramatic reduction in (in reality, almost abolishment of) septic morbidity is reported following supplementation of specific bioactive lactic bacteria in combination with prebiotic plant fibres, as tried in controlled studies in connection with extensive abdominal operations, liver transplantation and severe acute pancreatitis.

Infection control measures for adult cardiac surgery in the UK--a survey of current practice

The aim of the study was to define current UK practice for antimicrobial prophylaxis and preoperative screening for bloodborne viruses and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) before routine cardiac surgery. An e-mail survey was sent to the Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists (ACTA) Linkmen in all 36 UK adult cardiac surgical units, during May 2001. Questions were asked regarding MRSA, hepatitis B, C and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening. Regarding antimicrobial prophylaxis questions were asked regarding agent(s), dose, frequency and duration of use for coronary artery and value surgery. Responses were received from 29 units (response rate 81%). There was a wide variety of practices for all units surveyed. For MRSA screening, 19 units (65%) screened all patients before surgery, but two (7%) screened none, with the remaining eight units (28%) screening selected high-risk groups. Regarding screening for bloodborne viruses: eight units (28%) tested all patients routinely for hepatitis B, 11 units (39%) selectively tested only high-risk patients and transplant recipients. No units tested for hepatitis C and HIV infection routinely. All units used prophylactic antibiotics routinely, but the type and number of agents, along with dose and duration of therapy all varied widely. For coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, a single agent was used by 16 units (55%), two agents by 12 units (41%) and three agents by one unit (4%). There is a wide variation in infection control practice in adult cardiac units throughout the UK. Rationalization of preoperative screening and use of prophylactic antibiotics, by adopting nationally agreed practice guidelines, could significantly reduce costs and potentially reduce the incidence of resistant organisms.

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in the surgical patient

The primary prophylactic measure against postoperative infection is antiseptic technique in patient preparation, during surgery, and in postoperative patient care. Antimicrobial prophylaxis against postoperative infection is not indicated for procedures with a low infection rate because the expected benefit of antimicrobial treatment is less than the risk of an adverse medication reaction. Antimicrobial prophylaxis has been demonstrated to be of greater benefit than risk in some procedures with higher infection rates; however, because the problem is complex and the data are limited, extra-polating these findings to the practitioner's setting and the individual patient remains a challenge (Table 1). Although antimicrobial prophylaxis for bacterial endocarditis is not effective for most patients, the seriousness of the potential infection has driven the creation of guidelines recommending prophylaxis for at-risk patients undergoing at-risk procedures. Applying these guidelines appropriately could help to reduce unwarranted use of antimicrobials. In the prophylactic use of antimicrobials, as in many medical interventions, the difficulty is balancing the risks of the intervention with the potential benefits. Although we do not have either the randomized, controlled trials or the detailed, patient-specific information to estimate this balance precisely, there are general guidelines to help the clinician choose treatment for most patients.

[Antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery: practice patterns]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prescription patterns in French and foreign centres for antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Phone and written surveys concerned 64 French and 70 foreign centres. It focused on the first injection, the duration of treatment and the recommended agents.

RESULTS

87% of the French centres and 67% of the foreign centres answered the questionnaire. The first injection took place at anaesthesia induction in all French centres but during administration of premedication in 11% of foreign centres (p < 0.05). The duration of prophylaxis was restricted to the intraoperative period only in 20% and 15% of centres, respectively (ns), as specified by the recommendations. No French centres carried on the antibiotics more than 48 h versus 11% of foreign centres (p < 0.05). Cephalosporines of the second generation were prescribed in 84 and 49% of centres, respectively (p < 0.05). The combination of two antibiotics was less frequent in France than in foreign countries (5 versus 17%, p < 0.01). In absence of betalactamin allergy glycopeptides were not utilized in France versus 8% in foreign countries (p < 0.05). In case of allergy vancomycin was used in 66% of French and 42% of foreign centres.

CONCLUSION

The French recommendations may have influenced favourably the antibiotic choice but the prophylaxis duration was too long in most of the non French European centres.

Cephalosporins in surgical prophylaxis

Controlled clinical trials have shown that antimicrobial prophylaxis can lower the incidence of infection after certain operations, thus reducing morbidity, hospital stay, antibiotic usage and mortality due to sepsis. An effective prophylactic regimen should be directed against the most likely infecting organisms, but need not be active against every potential pathogen. Infection can be prevented when effective concentrations are present in the blood and the tissue during and shortly after the procedure. Therefore, antimicrobial prophylaxis should begin just before the operation: beginning earlier is unnecessary and potentially dangerous, beginning later is less effective. A single-dose prophylaxis after the induction of anesthesia is sufficient. If surgery is delayed or prolonged, a second dose is advisable if an antimicrobial drug with a short half-life is used. Postoperative administration is unnecessary and is harmful. Cephalosporins are considered to be the drug of choice, because they offer fewer allergic reactions. From the first generation cephalosporins, cefazolin has been widely recommended with success. From the second generation cephalosporins, cefuroxime, cefamandole and cefoxitin are increasingly recommended. Their antistaphylococcal activity is somewhat less strong but their activity against gram-negative bacteria is stronger. In addition, cefoxitin has good activity against anaerobes. Third generation cephalosporins, such as cefotaxime, cefoperazone, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime or ceftizoxime are generally not recommended for surgical prophylaxis. Despite these recommendations, they have been accepted by the medical community and are today in use in many countries as the most common drugs in surgical prophylaxis. Ceftriaxone in particular, is far exceeding the sales of any other drug for prophylaxis. Contra-indications, limitations, additional or other drugs and practical recommendations for specific procedures are discussed and the results of several prospective randomized studies are presented.