Radiotherapy in head and neck cancer in the elderly: a challenge

Outcome of radiotherapy for the treatment of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma in the very elderly population

BACKGROUND

Treatment selection for squamous cell carcinoma patients aged over 84 years is controversial. This retrospective chart review examined and compared characteristics of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma in very elderly (over 84 years) and younger patients (approximately 65 years). The secondary objective was to further evaluate the outcome of radiotherapy as a treatment modality in this patient population.

METHODS

Of all 23 very elderly patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy, with or without surgery, in the Davidoff Cancer Center, from 1992 to 2012, 19 had sufficient data for analysis, and comprised the study group.

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis was 86 years. Disease stage at diagnosis was I, II, III and IVA in 53 per cent, 21 per cent, 21 per cent and 5 per cent, respectively. Median radiotherapy dose was 60 Gy given in 25 fractions. Three patients had recurrence. No patient discontinued treatment because of toxicity. Median overall survival was 3.6 years (range, 0-10 years).

CONCLUSION

Very elderly laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients may derive a similar survival advantage as younger counterparts. Modern radiotherapy is effective and safe for treating laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma in this study population. Further, large-scale studies are needed.

Treatment Outcomes of Head and Neck Cancer Patients in the Elderly Receiving Different Chemoradiation Combinations: A Single-Center Experience

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the effect of definitive or adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) among elderly patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 150 elderly LA HNSCC patients (age ≥70) at a single institution. Demographics, disease control outcomes, and toxicities with different chemotherapy regimens were reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) estimates.

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis was 74 years (range 70-88). Of the cohort, 98 (65.3%) patients received definitive and 52 (34.7%) received adjuvant CRT; 44 (29.3%) patients received weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel, 43 (28.7%) weekly cetuximab, 33 (22%) weekly carboplatin, and 30 (20%) weekly cisplatin. The OS at 2 years was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 63-79%), and PFS at 2 years was 61% (95% CI: 53-70%). There was no significant difference in OS or PFS between definitive and adjuvant CRT (p = 0.867 and p = 0.475, respectively). Type of chemotherapy regimen (single-agent carboplatin vs. others) (95% CI: 1.1-3.9; p = 0.009) was a key prognostic factor in predicting OS in multivariable analysis. Concurrent use of cetuximab was associated with increased risk of PEG tube dependence at 6 months (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Management of LA HNSCC in the elderly is a challenging scenario. Our study shows that CRT is a feasible treatment modality for elderly patients with LA HNSCC. We recommend CRT with weekly cisplatin or weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel. A chemotherapy regimen should be carefully selected in this difficult to treat population.

Clinical characteristics, treatment intent, and outcome in a consecutive 10-year cohort of oral cancer patients aged 75 years and older

The prevalence of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in the elderly is expected to increase by nearly a third in the next decade. Its management in older patients is potentially more challenging due to their pre-existing medical comorbidities, frailty, reduced life expectancy, and social issues. The aim of this retrospective review was to report on treatment given to patients aged 75 years and over, case mix, and survival. All patients aged 75 years and over who were diagnosed with OSCC in Merseyside between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2016, and treated with either curative or palliative intent, were included. Their hospital notes were reviewed. Fisher's exact test and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used for data analysis. There were 236 patients (median (IQR) age 81 (78-86) years); 67% were treated curatively and 33% palliatively. Factors associated with palliation included older age, advanced tumour stage, cognitive impairment, and residence in a nursing or residential home. Of the 165 patients who were offered curative treatment, six (4%) declined due to personal or family reasons. Overall survival for palliative patients was 12% at one year and 7% at two years, whereas for patients treated curatively it was 74% at one year, 56% at two years, and 34% at five years. Patients over 85 years of age were less likely to have composite free flaps and postoperative radiotherapy. Perioperative mortality was 2.6%. Improvements in surgical techniques and perioperative management have enabled clinicians to offer treatment with curative intent to older frail patients, and with careful case selection outcomes can be very good.

Management of Early Head and Neck Cancer in Elderly Patients

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) frequently affects elderly patients. Given the frailty and comorbid conditions of this population as well as the potential toxicities associated with treatment, there is a risk of undertreatment in older patients. However, there is growing evidence that benefit with standard treatment is similar in the elderly and in younger patients. Few prospective trials specifically target the elderly, which forces clinicians to rely on subgroup analyses and retrospective data. Therefore, adequate pretreatment assessments are vital to anticipate factors that may contribute to morbidity during therapy. In addition, supportive care during treatment is essential. For patients of all ages who present with early or localized disease, curative treatment should be offered whenever possible. With more precise surgical and radiologic techniques, the ability to provide curative treatment while minimizing long-term toxicity has greatly improved. Not only our techniques but also our understanding of the disease have improved. Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related HNSCC has changed the treatment paradigm of advanced-stage disease because of the inherently better prognosis compared with tobacco- and alcohol-related HNSCC. How this will affect early-stage disease remains to be seen, but de-escalated therapy may prove a suitable strategy in eligible elderly patients. With improved therapies and understanding of the disease, additional prospective trials must be carried out in the elderly population.

Optimal management of the elderly patient with head and neck cancer: Issues regarding surgery, irradiation and chemotherapy

Head and neck cancer (HNC) represents the sixth most common malignancy and accounts for approximately 6% of new cancer cases annually worldwide. As life expectancy constantly increases, the onset of HNC in patients older than 65 years of age at diagnosis is not rare and up to one fourth of cases occurs in patients older that 70 years at age. Because elderly cancer patients are severely under-represented in clinical trials, there is a clear need to address the particular aspects of this specific patient group, especially in the context of novel multidisciplinary therapeutic approaches. The frailty of elderly patients with HNC is attributed to the high incidence of smoking and alcohol abuse in this malignancy and the presence of substantial cardiovascular, respiratory or metabolic comorbidities. In the current work, I provide an overview of current and emerging treatment approaches, in elderly patients with HNC. In particular, I discuss modern surgical approaches that improve radical excision rates while preserving functionality, the incorporation of modern radiotherapeutic techniques and the introduction of novel chemotherapeutic combinations and molecular targeted agents in an effort to reduce toxicity without compromising efficacy. Finally, there is an urgent need to increase accrual and active participation of elderly patients with HNC in clinical trials, including biomarker evaluation in biopsy specimens towards an individualized therapeutic approach.

Elderly patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and the benefit of multimodality therapy

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available regarding outcomes in elderly head and neck cancer patients. This retrospective study was designed to characterize head and neck cancer in geriatric patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included all patients in a large university-based tumor registry who were diagnosed with head and neck cancer from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2005. Patients aged ≥70 years at the time of diagnosis were defined as older. Overall survival and progression-free survival were censored at 60 months. Survival differences were compared using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Of 1,598 patients identified, 1,166 patients were aged <70 years (i.e., younger) and 281 patients were aged ≥70 years (older). When controlling for possible confounders, older patients were nearly twice as likely to die within 5 years as their younger counterparts (hazard ratio: 1.92). The median life expectancy for older patients was nearly 5 years for stage I-II disease and <2 years for stage III-IV disease. Older patients with stage III-IV disease who received multimodality therapy had 5-year survival similar to that younger patients with stage III-IV disease who were treated similarly (33.2% vs. 44.0%). Older patients with stage III-IV disease who received single-modality therapy had extremely poor survival compared with all other patients (hazard ratio for progression-free survival: 1.5).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the need for better understanding of the factors affecting head and neck cancer outcomes in elderly patients. Information about life expectancy in elderly head and neck cancer patients may help guide treatment decisions.

Survivorship--competing mortalities, morbidities, and second malignancies

Mortality of head and neck cancer has declined in the United States over the past 20 years. This improvement has been linked to use of multimodality treatment of advanced disease. Despite this improvement, disease-specific survival remains low. Patients who survive head and neck cancer are exposed to morbidity and mortality secondary to the same factors as the general population. Factors related to cancer and cancer treatment predispose them to increased risk of mortality. Improvements in head and neck cancer treatment have led to a scenario where an increasing proportion of patients die from causes other than the primary cancer, called competing mortalities.

Quality of life in older people with oral cancer

There is a growing elderly population presenting with, and surviving, oral cancer. Making decisions about treatment is complex, and is influenced in part by prognosis and expected outcomes for health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We used the University of Washington Head and Neck Quality of Life scale (UWQoL) to compare HRQoL in patients by age group at a time closest to one year after primary surgery. Survival was analysed using data from the Office for National Statistics. A consecutive series of 1091 patients treated curatively for oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) at the regional maxillofacial unit at Aintree University Hospital between 1992 and 2009 were included in the main analysis. UWQoL data for 638 patients were available from about one year after treatment. Older patients (65 years or over) reported better physical and emotional function notably in regard to appearance, speech, saliva (75 years and over), pain, shoulder, mood, and anxiety than younger patients with head and neck cancer treated by operation. In conclusion, older patients seem to cope and adjust well to treatment and this is reflected in their HRQoL scores, which are higher in many domains than those of younger patients with head and neck cancer.

Principles of surgical oncology in the elderly

Elderly patients constitute the largest group in oncologic medical practice, despite the fact that in solid cancers treated operatively, many patients are denied standard therapies and where such decision making is based solely on age. The “natural” assumptions that we have are often misleading; namely, that the elderly cannot tolerate complex or difficult procedures, chemotherapy, or radiation schedules; that their overall predictable medical health determines survival (and not the malignancy); or that older patients typically have less aggressive tumors. Clearly, patient selection and a comprehensive geriatric assessment is key where well-selected cases have the same cancer-specific survival as younger cohorts in a range of tumors as outlined including upper and lower gastrointestinal malignancy, head and neck cancer, and breast cancer. The assessment of patient fitness for surgery and adjuvant therapies is therefore critical to outcomes, where studies have clearly shown that fit older patients experience the same benefits and toxicities of chemotherapy as do younger patients and that when normalized for preexisting medical conditions,that older patients tolerate major operative procedures designed with curative oncological intent. At present, our problem is the lack of true evidence-based medicine specifically designed with age in mind, which effectively limits surgical decision making in disease-based strategies. This can only be achieved by the utilization of more standardized, comprehensive geriatric assessments to identify vulnerable older patients, aggressive pre-habilitation with amelioration of vulnerability causation, improvement of patient-centered longitudinal outcomes, and an improved surgical and medical understanding of relatively subtle decreases in organ functioning, social support mechanisms and impairments of health-related quality of life as a feature specifically of advanced age.

A specific approach for elderly patients with head and neck cancer

Approximately 10% of head and neck (HN) tumors occur in patients aged more than or equal to 80 years. In this population, the main challenge for physicians is to deal with the benefit/risk ratio of treatments and tumor-related symptoms. As elderly patients are generally excluded from clinical trials, there is a lack of evidence-based data with regard to the most appropriate multidisciplinary management. The prevalence of frailty and the pattern of comorbidities in this specific population are still unknown. The management of these tumors in a geriatric context is complex due to the high risk of toxicity of locoregional treatments. Thus, physicians often have to adapt to the treatment schedule to decrease potential adverse effects even with a risk of undertreatment. A retrospective series reported that the treatment delivered to elderly patients presenting with HN tumor complies with an institution's policy in less than 50% of cases, emphasizing the need to assess the outcome of personalized/adapted treatment in geriatric patients. The major issue is to determine which adaptation could be carried out, and then, what could be the respective individual benefit/risk ratio of each adaptation. In this review, we will focus on the locoregional management of elderly patients, and develop the issue of adapted local treatment. We will discuss the feasibility of adapted surgery and radiotherapy and provide current evidence-based data that may allow physicians involved in locoregional treatment of elderly patients with HN cancers to be acquainted with practical guidelines. Then, we will highlight the importance of nutritional support in this population in which the prevalence of malnutrition is high.

Patterns of care in elderly head-and-neck cancer radiation oncology patients: a single-center cohort study

PURPOSE

To compare the patterns of care for elderly head-and-neck cancer patients with those of younger patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective review was conducted of all new mucosal head-and-neck cancer referrals to radiation oncology between July 1, 2003 and December 31, 2007 at our institution. The clinical characteristics, treatment pattern, tolerance, and outcomes were compared between the elderly (aged ≥75 years) and younger (aged <75 years) cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 2,312 patients, including 452 (20%) elderly and 1,860 (80%) younger patients, were studied. The elderly patients were more likely to be women (36% vs. 27%, p <.01) and to have other malignancies (23% vs. 13%, p <.01), Stage I or II disease (38% vs. 32%, p <.01), and N0 status (56% vs. 42%, p <.01). Treatment was less often curative in intent (79% vs. 93%, p <.01). For the 1,487 patients who received definitive radiotherapy (RT), no differences were found between the elderly (n = 238) and younger (n = 1,249) patients in treatment interruption, completion, or treatment-related death. Within the subset of 760 patients who received intensified treatment (concurrent chemoradiotherapy or hyperfractionated accelerated RT), no difference was seen between the elderly (n = 46) and younger (n = 714) patients in treatment interruption, completion, or treatment-related death. After a median follow-up of 2.5 years, the 2-year cause-specific survival rate after definitive RT was 72% (range, 65-78%) for the elderly vs. 86% (range, 84-88%) for the younger patients (p <.01).

CONCLUSION

Elderly head-and-neck cancer patients exhibited different clinical characteristics and experienced different patterns of care from younger patients. Although age itself was an adverse predictor of cause-specific survival, its effect was modest. Elderly patients selected for definitive RT or intensified RT showed no evidence of impaired treatment tolerance.

Management of head and neck cancer in elderly patients

Head and neck cancer (HNC) represents a heterogeneous group of tumours requiring multimodality approaches. It is debatable whether HNC treatment in geriatric patients should be different to that delivered for younger patients. Furthermore, the risk of death seems to be higher in HNC patients with higher co-morbidity status. Despite the fact that there is no significant difference in outcome in younger versus older patients, older HNC patients are more likely to receive nonstandard, less aggressive therapies than younger patients. Age alone should not be the basis for selecting treatment options in older HNC patients. A thorough pretreatment evaluation of co-morbidities should always be performed, and radical surgical options should not be excluded in older HNC patients treated with curative intent, as postoperative complications occur no more frequently in older patients than in younger patients. Locoregional control and disease-free survival in older patients treated with radiation therapy (either with curative intent or in the palliative setting) are comparable to the results seen in younger HNC patients, with the same acute toxicity profile. In patients receiving systemic therapies, special attention must be given to modification of chemotherapy dosages according to renal and hepatic function. Molecular-targeted therapies appear to be very useful in such patients because of their favourable tolerability. In conclusion, once all physiological and biological risk factors have been addressed, a large proportion of geriatric patients can and should be offered the same HNC treatment as is offered to younger patients.

Elderly patients with head and neck cancer: short-term effects of surgical treatment on quality of life

Elderly patients with head and neck cancer are less likely to be treated surgically. However, little is known about surgical outcome and quality of life (QOL) in elderly patients after a major surgery. This prospective study compared the QOL and the surgical outcome of 54 elderly (> or =70 years) and 75 younger patients (45-60 years) with carcinoma of the oral cavity (stage > or = II), pharynx (stage > or = II) or larynx (stage > or = III). Before and 3 months after surgery, the patients completed questionnaires about QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35) and depression (CES-D). Before treatment, elderly and younger patients did not differ in QOL. Three months after the treatment, both groups scored worse on most QOL aspects, but there were no significant differences between the elderly and the younger patients. Surgical and systemic complication rates were similar for both the groups. In conclusion, we found no significant differences in the complication rate and QOL aspects between surgically treated elderly and younger patients.