1
|
Upadhyay R, Gogineni E, Tocaj G, Ma SJ, Bonomi M, Bhateja P, Konieczkowski DJ, Baliga S, Mitchell DL, Jhawar SR, Zhu S, Grecula JC, Dibs K, Gamez ME, Blakaj DM. Palliative Quad Shot Radiation Therapy with or without Concurrent Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1049. [PMID: 38473406 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16051049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC) have limited treatment options. 'QuadShot' (QS), a hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy regimen, can provide symptomatic relief and local control and may potentiate the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We compared outcomes of QS ± concurrent ICIs in the palliative treatment of HNC. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified patients who received ≥three cycles of QS from 2017 to 2022 and excluded patients without post-treatment clinical evaluation or imaging. Outcomes for patients who received QS alone were compared to those treated with ICI concurrent with QS, defined as receipt of ICI within 4 weeks of QS. RESULTS Seventy patients were included, of whom 57% received concurrent ICI. Median age was 65.5 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 57.9-77.8), and 50% patients had received prior radiation to a median dose of 66 Gy (IQR: 60-70). Median follow-up was 8.8 months. Local control was significantly higher with concurrent ICIs (12-month: 85% vs. 63%, p = 0.038). Distant control (12-month: 56% vs. 63%, p = 0.629) and median overall survival (9.0 vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.850) were similar between the two groups. On multivariable analysis, concurrent ICI was a significant predictor of local control (HR for local failure: 0.238; 95% CI: 0.073-0.778; p = 0.018). Overall, 23% patients experienced grade 3 toxicities, which was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The combination of QS with concurrent ICIs was well tolerated and significantly improved local control compared to QS alone. The median OS of 9.4 months compares favorably to historical controls for patients with HNC treated with QS. This approach represents a promising treatment option for patients with HNC unsuited for curative-intent treatment and warrants prospective evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rituraj Upadhyay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Emile Gogineni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Glenis Tocaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Sung J Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Marcelo Bonomi
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Priyanka Bhateja
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - David J Konieczkowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Darrion L Mitchell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Sachin R Jhawar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Simeng Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - John C Grecula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Khaled Dibs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Mauricio E Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Dukagjin M Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dibs K, Gogineni E, Jhawar SM, Baliga S, Grecula JC, Mitchell DL, Palmer J, Haglund K, Andraos TY, Zoller W, Ewing A, Bonomi M, Bhateja P, Tinoco G, Liebner D, Rocco JW, Old M, Gamez ME, Chakravarti A, Konieczkowski DJ, Blakaj DM. Scalp Irradiation with 3D-Milled Bolus: Initial Dosimetric and Clinical Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:688. [PMID: 38398079 PMCID: PMC10887235 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE A bolus is required when treating scalp lesions with photon radiation therapy. Traditional bolus materials face several issues, including air gaps and setup difficulty due to irregular, convex scalp geometry. A 3D-milled bolus is custom-formed to match individual patient anatomy, allowing improved dose coverage and homogeneity. Here, we describe the creation process of a 3D-milled bolus and report the outcomes for patients with scalp malignancies treated with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) utilizing a 3D-milled bolus. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-two patients treated from 2016 to 2022 using a 3D-milled bolus and VMAT were included. Histologies included squamous cell carcinoma (n = 14, 64%) and angiosarcoma (n = 8, 36%). A total of 7 (32%) patients were treated in the intact and 15 (68%) in the postoperative setting. The median prescription dose was 66.0 Gy (range: 60.0-69.96). RESULTS The target included the entire scalp for 8 (36%) patients; in the remaining 14 (64%), the median ratio of planning target volume to scalp volume was 35% (range: 25-90%). The median dose homogeneity index was 1.07 (range: 1.03-1.15). Six (27%) patients experienced acute grade 3 dermatitis and one (5%) patient experienced late grade 3 skin ulceration. With a median follow-up of 21.4 months (range: 4.0-75.4), the 18-month rates of locoregional control and overall survival were 75% and 79%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the clinical outcomes for patients with scalp malignancies treated with the combination of VMAT and a 3D-milled bolus. This technique resulted in favorable clinical outcomes and an acceptable toxicity profile in comparison with historic controls and warrants further investigation in a larger prospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaled Dibs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (K.D.); (E.G.); (S.M.J.); (S.B.); (J.C.G.); (D.L.M.); (J.P.); (K.H.); (T.Y.A.); (W.Z.); (A.E.); (A.C.); (D.J.K.)
| | - Emile Gogineni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (K.D.); (E.G.); (S.M.J.); (S.B.); (J.C.G.); (D.L.M.); (J.P.); (K.H.); (T.Y.A.); (W.Z.); (A.E.); (A.C.); (D.J.K.)
| | - Sachin M. Jhawar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (K.D.); (E.G.); (S.M.J.); (S.B.); (J.C.G.); (D.L.M.); (J.P.); (K.H.); (T.Y.A.); (W.Z.); (A.E.); (A.C.); (D.J.K.)
| | - Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (K.D.); (E.G.); (S.M.J.); (S.B.); (J.C.G.); (D.L.M.); (J.P.); (K.H.); (T.Y.A.); (W.Z.); (A.E.); (A.C.); (D.J.K.)
| | - John C. Grecula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (K.D.); (E.G.); (S.M.J.); (S.B.); (J.C.G.); (D.L.M.); (J.P.); (K.H.); (T.Y.A.); (W.Z.); (A.E.); (A.C.); (D.J.K.)
| | - Darrion L. Mitchell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (K.D.); (E.G.); (S.M.J.); (S.B.); (J.C.G.); (D.L.M.); (J.P.); (K.H.); (T.Y.A.); (W.Z.); (A.E.); (A.C.); (D.J.K.)
| | - Joshua Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (K.D.); (E.G.); (S.M.J.); (S.B.); (J.C.G.); (D.L.M.); (J.P.); (K.H.); (T.Y.A.); (W.Z.); (A.E.); (A.C.); (D.J.K.)
| | - Karl Haglund
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (K.D.); (E.G.); (S.M.J.); (S.B.); (J.C.G.); (D.L.M.); (J.P.); (K.H.); (T.Y.A.); (W.Z.); (A.E.); (A.C.); (D.J.K.)
| | - Therese Youssef Andraos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (K.D.); (E.G.); (S.M.J.); (S.B.); (J.C.G.); (D.L.M.); (J.P.); (K.H.); (T.Y.A.); (W.Z.); (A.E.); (A.C.); (D.J.K.)
| | - Wesley Zoller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (K.D.); (E.G.); (S.M.J.); (S.B.); (J.C.G.); (D.L.M.); (J.P.); (K.H.); (T.Y.A.); (W.Z.); (A.E.); (A.C.); (D.J.K.)
| | - Ashlee Ewing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (K.D.); (E.G.); (S.M.J.); (S.B.); (J.C.G.); (D.L.M.); (J.P.); (K.H.); (T.Y.A.); (W.Z.); (A.E.); (A.C.); (D.J.K.)
| | - Marcelo Bonomi
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (M.B.); (P.B.); (G.T.); (D.L.)
| | - Priyanka Bhateja
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (M.B.); (P.B.); (G.T.); (D.L.)
| | - Gabriel Tinoco
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (M.B.); (P.B.); (G.T.); (D.L.)
| | - David Liebner
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (M.B.); (P.B.); (G.T.); (D.L.)
| | - James W. Rocco
- Department of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (J.W.R.); (M.O.)
| | - Matthew Old
- Department of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (J.W.R.); (M.O.)
| | - Mauricio E. Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Arnab Chakravarti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (K.D.); (E.G.); (S.M.J.); (S.B.); (J.C.G.); (D.L.M.); (J.P.); (K.H.); (T.Y.A.); (W.Z.); (A.E.); (A.C.); (D.J.K.)
| | - David J. Konieczkowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (K.D.); (E.G.); (S.M.J.); (S.B.); (J.C.G.); (D.L.M.); (J.P.); (K.H.); (T.Y.A.); (W.Z.); (A.E.); (A.C.); (D.J.K.)
| | - Dukagjin M. Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (K.D.); (E.G.); (S.M.J.); (S.B.); (J.C.G.); (D.L.M.); (J.P.); (K.H.); (T.Y.A.); (W.Z.); (A.E.); (A.C.); (D.J.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gogineni E, Schaefer D, Ewing A, Andraos T, DiCostanzo D, Weldon M, Christ D, Baliga S, Jhawar S, Mitchell D, Grecula J, Konieczkowski DJ, Palmer J, Jahraus T, Dibs K, Chakravarti A, Martin D, Gamez ME, Blakaj D. Systematic Implementation of Effective Quality Assurance Processes for the Assessment of Radiation Target Volumes in Head and Neck Cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024:S1879-8500(24)00007-9. [PMID: 38237893 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Significant heterogeneity exists in clinical quality assurance (QA) practices within radiation oncology departments, with most chart rounds lacking prospective peer-reviewed contour evaluation. This has the potential to significantly affect patient outcomes, particularly for head and neck cancers (HNC) given the large variance in target volume delineation. With this understanding, we incorporated a prospective systematic peer contour-review process into our workflow for all patients with HNC. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of implementing prospective peer review into practice for our National Cancer Institute Designated Cancer Center and to report factors associated with contour modifications. METHODS AND MATERIALS Starting in November 2020, our department adopted a systematic QA process with real-time metrics, in which contours for all patients with HNC treated with radiation therapy were prospectively peer reviewed and graded. Contours were graded with green (unnecessary), yellow (minor), or red (major) colors based on the degree of peer-recommended modifications. Contours from November 2020 through September 2021 were included for analysis. RESULTS Three hundred sixty contours were included. Contour grades were made up of 89.7% green, 8.9% yellow, and 1.4% red grades. Physicians with >12 months of clinical experience were less likely to have contour changes requested than those with <12 months (8.3% vs 40.9%; P < .001). Contour grades were significantly associated with physician case load, with physicians presenting more than the median number of 50 cases having significantly less modifications requested than those presenting <50 (6.7% vs 13.3%; P = .013). Physicians working with a resident or fellow were less likely to have contour changes requested than those without a trainee (5.2% vs 12.6%; P = .039). Frequency of major modification requests significantly decreased over time after adoption of prospective peer contour review, with no red grades occurring >6 months after adoption. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the importance of prospective peer contour-review implementation into systematic clinical QA processes for HNC. Physician experience proved to be the highest predictor of approved contours. A growth curve was demonstrated, with major modifications declining after prospective contour review implementation. Even within a high-volume academic practice with subspecialist attendings, >10% of patients had contour changes made as a direct result of prospective peer review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Gogineni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - D Schaefer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - A Ewing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - T Andraos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - D DiCostanzo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - M Weldon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - D Christ
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - S Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - S Jhawar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - D Mitchell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - J Grecula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - D J Konieczkowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - J Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - T Jahraus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - K Dibs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - A Chakravarti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - D Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - M E Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - D Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Foote RL, Harmsen WS, Amundson AC, Carr AB, Gamez ME, Garces YI, Lester SC, Ma DJ, McGee LA, Moore EJ, Neben Wittich MA, Patel SH, Routman DM, Rwigema JCM, Van Abel KM, Yin LX, Muller OM, Shiraishi S. Mean Oral Cavity Organ-at-Risk Dose Predicts Opioid Use and Hospitalization during Radiotherapy for Patients with Head and Neck Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:349. [PMID: 38254837 PMCID: PMC10814074 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 75% of all head and neck cancer patients are treated with radiotherapy (RT). RT to the oral cavity results in acute and late adverse events which can be severe and detrimental to a patient's quality of life and function. The purpose of this study was to explore associations between RT dose to a defined oral cavity organ-at-risk (OAR) avoidance structure, provider- and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), opioid use, and hospitalization. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively obtained outcomes using multivariable modeling. The study included 196 patients treated with RT involving the oral cavity for a head and neck tumor. A defined oral cavity OAR avoidance structure was used in all patients for RT treatment planning. Validated PROs were collected prospectively. Opioid use and hospitalization were abstracted electronically from medical records. RESULTS Multivariable modeling revealed the mean dose to the oral cavity OAR was significantly associated with opioid use (p = 0.0082) and hospitalization (p = 0.0356) during and within 30 days of completing RT. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study may be valuable in RT treatment planning for patients with tumors of the head and neck region to reduce the need for opioid use and hospitalization during treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L. Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (A.C.A.); (M.E.G.); (Y.I.G.); (S.C.L.); (D.J.M.); (M.A.N.W.); (D.M.R.)
| | - W. Scott Harmsen
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Adam C. Amundson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (A.C.A.); (M.E.G.); (Y.I.G.); (S.C.L.); (D.J.M.); (M.A.N.W.); (D.M.R.)
| | - Alan B. Carr
- Department of Dental Specialties, Division of Esthetic and Prosthetic Dentistry, Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (A.B.C.); (O.M.M.)
| | - Mauricio E. Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (A.C.A.); (M.E.G.); (Y.I.G.); (S.C.L.); (D.J.M.); (M.A.N.W.); (D.M.R.)
| | - Yolanda I. Garces
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (A.C.A.); (M.E.G.); (Y.I.G.); (S.C.L.); (D.J.M.); (M.A.N.W.); (D.M.R.)
| | - Scott C. Lester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (A.C.A.); (M.E.G.); (Y.I.G.); (S.C.L.); (D.J.M.); (M.A.N.W.); (D.M.R.)
| | - Daniel J. Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (A.C.A.); (M.E.G.); (Y.I.G.); (S.C.L.); (D.J.M.); (M.A.N.W.); (D.M.R.)
| | - Lisa A. McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA; (L.A.M.); (S.H.P.); (J.-C.M.R.)
| | - Eric J. Moore
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (E.J.M.); (K.M.V.A.); (L.X.Y.)
| | - Michelle A. Neben Wittich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (A.C.A.); (M.E.G.); (Y.I.G.); (S.C.L.); (D.J.M.); (M.A.N.W.); (D.M.R.)
| | - Samir H. Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA; (L.A.M.); (S.H.P.); (J.-C.M.R.)
| | - David M. Routman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (A.C.A.); (M.E.G.); (Y.I.G.); (S.C.L.); (D.J.M.); (M.A.N.W.); (D.M.R.)
| | - Jean-Claude M. Rwigema
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA; (L.A.M.); (S.H.P.); (J.-C.M.R.)
| | - Kathryn M. Van Abel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (E.J.M.); (K.M.V.A.); (L.X.Y.)
| | - Linda X. Yin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (E.J.M.); (K.M.V.A.); (L.X.Y.)
| | - Olivia M. Muller
- Department of Dental Specialties, Division of Esthetic and Prosthetic Dentistry, Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (A.B.C.); (O.M.M.)
| | - Satomi Shiraishi
- Division of Medical Physics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Upadhyay R, Dhakal A, Karivedu V, Wheeler C, Hoyd R, Bhateja P, Bonomi M, Valentin S, Gamez ME, Konieczkowski DJ, Baliga S, Grecula JC, Blakaj DM, Gogineni E, Mitchell DL, Denko N, Jhawar SR, Spakowicz D. Comparative Analysis of Tumor Microbiome, Molecular Profile and Immune Cell Abundance by HPV Status in Head and Neck Cancers and Their Impact on Survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e264. [PMID: 37785006 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Traditional clinical and molecular prognostic factors offer valuable insight into the heterogeneous natural history and treatment response of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) yet fail to explain the full spectrum of observed variability. The tumor microenvironment (TME), comprising microbiome and immune cells can impact treatment response and prognosis. We analyzed The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to evaluate the association of specific microbes and genes in TME with survival and their differential expression in HPV positive (+) and HPV negative (-) HNSCC. MATERIALS/METHODS HNSCC RNA sequencing (RNAseq) samples from TCGA were processed through the Exogenous sequencing in Tumors and Immune Cells (ExoTIC) pipeline to identify gene expression and microbial presence. HPV status was assessed by detection of papillomaviridae family of microbes. Clinical data from TCGA was extracted to compare overall survival (OS) and control for competing variables using Cox proportional hazards regression. Difference in immune cell abundance was evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis test. All statistical analysis was performed using R. RESULTS A total of 498 RNAseq samples from TCGA were analyzed. Oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx tumors comprised 21.6%, 15%, 1.8%, and 22.2% of specimens, respectively. HPV was detected in 111 patients (22%), most commonly Alpha papillomavirus 9 (90.1%). Of the 5838 enriched microbes, 330 were significantly associated with OS after controlling for tumor stage, smoking, and age. Specifically, the presence of Alpha papillomavirus 9 was associated with significantly improved OS [adjusted HR = 0.60 (95% CI 0.40 - 0.89, p = 0.01)]. Microbial species found in more abundance in HPV- tumors included Citrobacter farmeri, Thermoanaerobacter kivui and Yersinia pestis which are gram negative anaerobes. Genes related to cellular transport and DNA repair were enriched while genes related to proliferation (e.g., SAGE1) were depleted in HPV+ samples. HPV- tumors had a significantly higher number of M0 (p < 0.001) and M2 macrophages (p = 0.035) while HPV+ tumors had more T regulatory cells (p < 0.001) and CD8+ T-cells (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Tumor microenvironment was significantly associated with survival for HNSCC patients, with particular microbes such as Alpha papillomavirus 9 correlating with improved OS. Greater abundance of certain anaerobic microbes was seen in HPV- tumors. These findings suggest TME can be used to predict patient outcomes and potentially guide personalized treatment approaches. We found an abundance of M0 and M2 macrophages in HPV- tumors, which are considered pro-tumorigenic, while anti-tumor M1 macrophages were similar in the two groups. This may help identify mechanism of resistance to immunotherapies and tailor novel immunotherapy combinations in specific patient subgroups. With further prospective research and external validation these findings have the potential to significantly impact the way we treat HNSCC in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - A Dhakal
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - V Karivedu
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - C Wheeler
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - R Hoyd
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - P Bhateja
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - M Bonomi
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - S Valentin
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - M E Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - S Baliga
- Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - J C Grecula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - D M Blakaj
- James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - E Gogineni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - D L Mitchell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - N Denko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - S R Jhawar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - D Spakowicz
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dibs K, Konieczkowski DJ, Grecula JC, Mitchell DL, Baliga S, Gogineni E, Barve R, Jhawar SR, Zoller W, Gamez ME, Blakaj DM. Scalp Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Using 3D Milled Bolus: Dosimetry, Toxicity and Outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e292-e293. [PMID: 37785077 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Radiotherapy for scalp lesions is frequently challenging due to the competing needs for target volume coverage, sparing of numerous critical nearby OARs, and reproducible bolus setup despite the irregular and highly convex scalp geometry. Here, we evaluate the use of 3D milled bolus in treating such tumors. MATERIALS/METHODS A retrospective analysis of scalp patients (pts) treated between 2016-2022 using 3D milled bolus and VMAT. All pts were treated with 6 MV photon beams, IGRT via daily CBCT, and 6-degree of Freedom (6-DOF) couch tops. Pts demographics, tumor characteristics, DVHs, toxicities and outcomes were evaluated. Regional control (RC) defined as control of the disease in the rest of the scalp/neck and local control (LC) defined as disease control within the PTV. RESULTS A total of 23 pts were identified. Median age 74 (46-85), ECOG performance status was 0-1 in 20 pts (87%) and 92% were males. The histopathologies were squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (61%), angiosarcoma (AS) (35%) and melanoma (4%). 35% of pts were treated with definitive intent to gross disease; the remaining 65% were treated post-operatively, 22% with microscopically positive margins and 43% with negative margins. 21% had perineural invasion (PNI), and none had lymphovascular invasion (LVI). 78% had T3/T4 and 13% had N+ disease. Median radiation dose was 66 Gy (60-69.96Gy). 44% received concurrent systemic therapy (Paclitaxel 22%, Cemiplimab 12%, Temozolomide 5%, Nivolumab 5%). In 40% of pts, the whole scalp was treated; in the remaining 60%, the median ratio of PTV volume to scalp volume was 35% (25-90%). 22% of pts (n = 5) had neck irradiation for prophylactic (3pts)/ neck lymph node involvement (2 pts). The median brain Dmax was 65 Gy (52.5-71.9), median brain mean dose was 15.4Gy (1.4-38.4), median eye Dmax was 10.9Gy (0.23-49), median cochlea mean was 8.4Gy (0.1-20.4), median lacrimal gland mean dose was 6.8Gy (0.11-38), median hippocampus Dmin was 5.9Gy (0.1-14.9) and Dmax was 10Gy (0.3-23). Most common acute side effects were grade 1-2 fatigue (100%), grade 1-2 pain (78%), grade 1 dysgeusia (22%), grade 1-2 dermatitis (74%). The only grade > = 3 adverse event was grade 3 dermatitis in 26%. Regarding long-term side effects, one pt had grade 2 osteoradionecrosis and other one developed grade 2 skin ulcer. 17% developed grade 1 memory impairment. 17% had grade 1 eye dryness. None developed brain radionecrosis. At a median follow-up was 14.4 months (1-73.5), the 1-yr LC was 96%. The 1-yr RC was 75% overall, 100% in angiosarcoma vs 62% in SCC (p = 0.18). Of the 4 regional recurrences, 1 pt had marginal recurrence along V1, 2 had neck nodal recurrence, and 1 had recurrence elsewhere in the scalp. 1-yr DMFS was 62% overall. 1-yr OS was 78% overall, 100% for AS vs 64% for SCC (P = 0.097). CONCLUSION VMAT planning with 3D milled bolus permits technically sound radiotherapy for scalp targets with an acceptable toxicity profile and relatively favorable clinical outcomes. This approach warrants further evaluation in a larger prospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Dibs
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - J C Grecula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - D L Mitchell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - S Baliga
- Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - E Gogineni
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - R Barve
- The James Cancer Center, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - S R Jhawar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - W Zoller
- The James Cancer Center, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - M E Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - D M Blakaj
- James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dibs K, Palmer JD, Konieczkowski DJ, Gogineni E, Mitchell DL, Raval R, Baliga S, Barve R, Elguindy AN, Jhawar SR, Gamez ME, Blakaj DM. Brachial Plexus Tolerance to Standard Fractionation Re-Irradiation: The Ohio State University Experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:S124. [PMID: 37784320 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Factors contributing to brachial plexopathy (BPP) in the re-irradiation setting need further assessment. Preliminary work revealed that higher the doses and the use of concurrent cisplatin were associated with higher risk of BPP. Here, we expand our cohort and increase our follow-up duration, given the late nature of BPP development. MATERIALS/METHODS Sixty-two BP sites with 41 patients (pts), treated between 2015 and 2020 for recurrent H&N cancer, were assessed. Contours and plans were reviewed via a prospective multidisciplinary chart rounds prior to treatment delivery and re-verified by two authors prior to this analysis. Kaplan-Meier and logistic regression were used to test the correlation between variables and outcomes. ROC was used to evaluate the cutoff values. Common terminology criteria of adverse events were used to define BPP. RESULTS The median age of pts was 63 (29-78) and 65% were males. Median prescription dose was 70 Gy (60-70) for the 1st course and 66 Gy (44-70) for the 2nd course. 13% received intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) during salvage treatment ranging from 10-15 Gy. 30% of pts in the 1st course and 80% in the 2nd course of pts had surgery. Concurrent chemotherapy was delivered to 71% of pts in the 1st course (Cisplatin 34%, Cetuximab 22%, Carboplatin +/- Paclitaxel 15%) and 76% in the 2nd course (Carboplatin/Paclitaxel 41%, Cisplatin 19%, Cetuximab 12%, Nivolumab 4%). The median interval between courses was 26.5 months (8-221). The median cumulative Dmax (0.03cc) and mean dose to the BP were 96.5 Gy (51-144) and 61.5 Gy (15-110), respectively. The median V60, V70, V80, V90, and V100 were 3.6cc (0.03-10.4), 2.4cc (0-9.9), 1.3cc (0-9.3), 0.6cc (0-8.4), and 0.0015cc (0-7.2), respectively. The median follow-up after the completion of the 2nd RT course was 19 months (1.4-71.5). The 1-yr incidence of BPP was 17%, with a median time to onset of 8.9 months (1-16.6). Factors associated with development of BPP were cumulative Dmax > 100 Gy (HR 1.06, [CI 1.014-1.1], p = 0.009), cumulative mean dose >70 Gy (HR 1.05, [CI 1.01-1.09], p = 0.03), V80 > 1.6cc (HR 1.2. [CI 0.99- 1.52], p = 0.06), V90 > 1cc (HR 1.3, [CI 1.013-1.58], p = 0.038), V100 > 0.3cc (HR 1.33, [1.044-1.69], p = 0.021) and the usage of concurrent cisplatin during the 2nd course (HR 8.9, [CI 2.36-33.75], p = 0.001). Other factors including gender, age, surgery, treatment interval between the two courses, IORT, V60, and V70 were not associated with increased risk of BPP. The incidence of grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 BPP were 9.6%, 3% and 2.4%, respectively. The 1-yr OS was 70% and LC was 60%. CONCLUSION At a median follow up of 19 months, the 1-yr incidence of grade 2 and 3 BPP was approximately 5%. Cisplatin during the 2nd course, cumulative metrics of Dmax 100 Gy, mean 70 Gy, V80 1.6cc, V90 1cc and V100 0.3cc were associated with development of BPP. Prospective study, longer follow up, and higher numbers are warranted. To our knowledge, this represents the largest cohort and longest follow up yet reported for BPP in the re-irradiation setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Dibs
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - J D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - E Gogineni
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - D L Mitchell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - R Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - S Baliga
- Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - R Barve
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - A N Elguindy
- The James Cancer Center, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - S R Jhawar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - M E Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - D M Blakaj
- James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ebner DK, Evans JM, Christensen B, Breinholt J, Gamez ME, Lester SC, Routman DM, Ma DJ, Price K, Dong H, Park SS, Chintakuntlawar AV, Neben-Wittich MA, McGee LA, Garces Y, Patel SH, Foote RL, Evans JD. Unique T-cell Sub-Population Shifts after SBPT and Nivolumab in Platinum Refractory HNC: Biomarker Correlates from ROR1771. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e580. [PMID: 37785763 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) ROR1771 was a clinical trial investigating the use of stereotactic body proton radiotherapy (SBPT) and nivolumab in recurrent platinum refractory head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The planned analysis of T-cell subpopulation and biomarker response is herein presented. MATERIALS/METHODS Patients with metastatic histologically confirmed HNSCC from any primary site received 2 cycles of nivolumab followed by SBPT to 1-2 selected target lesion(s) (hilar/lung: 8 of 12 patients), followed by maintenance nivolumab. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated pre-/post-treatment. Flow cytometry identified T-cell subpopulations. Single Cell 5' Gene Expression (GEX) and V(D)J T Cell Receptor libraries were prepared using Single Cell Immune Profiling. Seurat (v4.1.1) was used to identify cell type clusters, and differential expression post-filtration was evaluated using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. RESULTS A total of 12 patients were eligible for analysis, with one alive at time of analysis, 52 months from start of treatment. Median overall survival here was 12.5 months vs. 7.5-months on CheckMate 141. SBPT ranged from 35-50 Gy. Sequential changes in T-cell populations from baseline were noted with initiation of nivolumab, driving decrease in tumor-reactive (TTR; CD11ahighPD1+CD8+), central memory (TCM; CCR7+CD45RA-), and effector T-cells (TEF; CCR7-CD45RA-). TTR and TCM increased following SBPT, with greatest increase (3.5x TTR and 5.2x TCM) in the surviving patient. An average of 68 genes with significant differential expression between timepoints (p<0.0001) demonstrated RNA gene expression changes across all cell subtypes, including ribosomal (RPL and RPS) genes, ACTB, FTL, MALAT1, and others. This averaged 113 genes across all timepoints in the surviving patient, with peak following nivolumab induction. On T-cell receptor (TCR) analysis of this patient, the predominant clonotype diversity changed substantially following nivolumab. Following SBPT, clonotype diversity again changed to include a milieu seen neither at baseline nor with nivolumab alone. These TCRs persisted for approximately 2 weeks following SBPT before returning to resemble the nivolumab-induced TCR diversity alone, coinciding with disease recurrence. CONCLUSION ROR1771 demonstrated overall survival favorably comparable to CheckMate 141. Biomarker analysis of peripheral blood samples demonstrated significant shifts in T-cell subpopulations and underlying gene expression to nivolumab and then to SBPT administration. SBPT to a target lesion changed TCR clonotypes within the peripheral blood beyond those seen with nivolumab administration, with fading of these TCR clonotypes coinciding with recurrence. SBPT in combination with nivolumab may drive systemic immunologic change above that induced by nivolumab alone and warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D K Ebner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - J M Evans
- Intermountain Precision Genomics, St George, UT
| | | | - J Breinholt
- Intermountain Precision Genomics, St George, UT
| | - M E Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - S C Lester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - D M Routman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - D J Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - K Price
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - H Dong
- Department of Urology and Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - S S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - L A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Y Garces
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - S H Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | - R L Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - J D Evans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, UT
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Baliga S, Mitchell D, Yildiz VO, Gogineni E, Konieczkowski DJ, Grecula J, Blakaj DM, Liu X, Gamez ME. Disparities in survival outcomes among Black patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer. J Med Virol 2023; 95:e28448. [PMID: 36583477 PMCID: PMC10107101 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.28448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Patients with human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPSCC) have a favorable prognosis and excellent overall survival (OS), and studies have demonstrated these findings in cohorts of predominantly White patients. Racial/ethnic (R/E) minorities, particularly Black patients, with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have worse survival outcomes compared with White patients. In this study, we aimed to determine if Black patients with HPV-OPSCC have a similar favorable prognosis to the White population. This was a population-based retrospective cohort study that analyzed HNSCC patients using the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2016. We identified patients with Stage I-IV HPV- OPSCC who were treated with radiation, surgery, chemotherapy, or a combination of modalities. Patient outcomes were stratified by R/E groups including White Versus Black patients. The main outcome in this study was OS. Analyses for proportions of categorical variables were performed using a χ2 or Fisher's exact test. Univariate and multivariate time-to-event survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates and log-rank test to test the differences between strata. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the association between covariates and risk of death (OS). We identified 9256 OPSCC patients who met inclusion criteria and were treated between 2010 and 2016, of which 7912 were White (85.5%) and 1344 were Black (14.5%). A total of 1727 were HPV-OPSCC, of which 1598 were White (92.5%) and 129 (7.5%) were Black. By race, the 5-year OS for White versus Black OPSCC patients was 42% versus 23%, respectively (log-rank, p < 0.0001). Among HPV-positive OPSCC patients, the 5-year OS for White versus Black patients was 65% versus 39% (log-rank, p < 0.0001). Among HPV-negative patients, the 5-year OS for White versus Black patients was 36% versus 13% (log-rank, p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, after accounting for age, sex, insurance status, income, Charlson-Deyo score, receipt of surgery, distance from facility, and total treatment time, Black race trended toward, but was not associated with worse survival. Hazard ratio (HR:1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-1.81, p = 0.255). This national cohort study of OPSCC patients demonstrates that Black patients with HPV-OPSCC have a poor prognosis and OS similar to HPV-negative White patients. This may be partly due to socioeconomic barriers such as insurance and income. Further work is needed to better understand the specific drivers of inferior survival outcomes in this specific patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Darrion Mitchell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Vedat O Yildiz
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Center for Biostatistics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Emile Gogineni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - David J Konieczkowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - John Grecula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Dukagjin M Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Xuefeng Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Mauricio E Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gao RW, Routman DM, Harmsen WS, Ebrahimi S, Foote RL, Ma DJ, Neben-Wittich M, McGee LA, Patel SH, Moore EJ, Choby GW, Tasche KK, Price KA, Gamez ME, Lester SC. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck: Patterns of recurrence and implications for intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Head Neck 2023; 45:187-196. [PMID: 36222355 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We seek to inform radiotherapy (RT) delivery for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck (ACC) by evaluating RT techniques and recurrence patterns. METHODS We identified patients with ACC treated with curative-intent RT from 2005 to 2021. Imaging was reviewed to determine local recurrence (LR). RESULTS Ninety-one patients were included. The 5-year LR risk was 12.2% (6.6-22.7). One patient each experienced a marginal and out-of-field recurrence. Patients receiving >60 Gy postoperatively had a 5-year LR risk of 0% compared to 10.7% (4.2-27.2) with ≤60 Gy. Those receiving 70 and <70 Gy definitively had a 5-year LR risk of 15.2% (2.5-91.6) and 33.3% (6.7-100.0), respectively. No patients had regional nodal failure. CONCLUSIONS Modern, conformal RT for ACC results in low rates of LR. Doses >60 and 70 Gy may improve control in the postoperative and definitive settings, respectively. Elective nodal treatment can be omitted in well-selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert W Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - David M Routman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - William S Harmsen
- Department of Biostatistics & Information, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sasha Ebrahimi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Robert L Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Daniel J Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Lisa A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Samir H Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Eric J Moore
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Garret W Choby
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kendall K Tasche
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Katharine A Price
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mauricio E Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Scott C Lester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dhakal A, Upadhyay R, Wheeler C, Hoyd R, Karivedu V, Gamez ME, Valentin S, Vanputten M, Bhateja P, Bonomi M, Konieczkowski DJ, Baliga S, Mitchell DL, Grecula JC, Blakaj DM, Denko NC, Jhawar SR, Spakowicz D. Association between Tumor Microbiome and Hypoxia across Anatomic Subsites of Head and Neck Cancers. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:15531. [PMID: 36555172 PMCID: PMC9778747 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232415531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objective(s): Microbiome has been shown to affect tumorigenesis by promoting inflammation. However, the association between the upper aerodigestive microbiome and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is not well established. Hypoxia is a modifiable factor associated with poor radiation response. Our study analyzed the HNSCC tumor samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to investigate the relationship between different HNSCC tumor subsites, hypoxia, and local tumor microbiome composition. Results: A total of 357 patients were included [Oral cavity (OC) = 226, Oropharynx (OPx) = 53, and Larynx/Hypopharynx (LHPx) = 78], of which 12.8%, 71.7%, and 10.3%, respectively, were HPV positive. The mean (SD) hypoxia scores were 30.18 (11.10), 24.31 (14.13), and 29.53 (12.61) in OC, OPx, and LHPx tumors, respectively, with higher values indicating greater hypoxia. The hypoxia score was significantly higher for OC tumors compared to OPx (p = 0.044) and LHPx (p = 0.002). There was no significant correlation between hypoxia and HPV status. Pseudomonas sp. in OC, Actinomyces sp. and Sulfurimonas sp. in OPx, and Filifactor, Pseudomonas and Actinomyces sp. in LHPx had the strongest association with the hypoxia score. Materials/Methods: Tumor RNAseq samples from TCGA were processed, and the R package “tmesig” was used to calculate gene expression signature, including the Buffa hypoxia (BH) score, a validated hypoxia signature using 52 hypoxia-regulated genes. Microbe relative abundances were modeled with primary tumor location and a high vs. low tertile BH score applying a gamma-distributed generalized linear regression using the “stats” package in R, with adjusted p-value < 0.05 considered significant. Conclusions: In our study, oral cavity tumors were found to be more hypoxic compared to other head and neck subsites, which could potentially contribute to their radiation resistance. For each subsite, distinct microbial populations were over-represented in hypoxic tumors in a subsite-specific manner. Further studies focusing on an association between microbiome, hypoxia, and patient outcomes are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aastha Dhakal
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Rituraj Upadhyay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Caroline Wheeler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Rebecca Hoyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Vidhya Karivedu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Mauricio E. Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901, USA
| | - Sasha Valentin
- Department of Dentistry, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Meade Vanputten
- Department of Dentistry, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Priyanka Bhateja
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Marcelo Bonomi
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - David J. Konieczkowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Darrion L. Mitchell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - John C. Grecula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Dukagjin M. Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Nicholas C. Denko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Sachin R. Jhawar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Daniel Spakowicz
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Johnson BJ, Guo R, Moore EJ, Price DL, Van Abel KM, Van Gompel JJ, Link MJ, Peris‐Celda M, Stokken JK, Pinheiro‐Neto C, Kottschade L, Markovic S, Block M, McWilliams R, Montane H, Dimou A, Gergelis K, Gamez ME, Choby G. Sinonasal Mucosal Melanoma: An Analysis of Treatment‐Related Adverse Events and Associated Factors. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2022; 13:1037-1041. [DOI: 10.1002/alr.23118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- B. Jake Johnson
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
| | - Ruifeng Guo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology Division of Anatomic Pathology Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
| | - Eric J. Moore
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
- Department of Neurologic Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
| | - Daniel L. Price
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
- Department of Neurologic Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
| | - Kathryn M. Van Abel
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
- Department of Neurologic Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
| | - Jamie J. Van Gompel
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
- Department of Neurologic Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
| | - Michael J. Link
- Department of Neurologic Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
| | - Maria Peris‐Celda
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
- Department of Neurologic Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
| | - Janalee K. Stokken
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
- Department of Neurologic Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
| | - Carlos Pinheiro‐Neto
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
- Department of Neurologic Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
| | | | | | - Matthew Block
- Department of Medical Oncology Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
| | | | | | | | - Kimberly Gergelis
- Department of Radiation Oncology Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology Rochester Medical Center Rochester NY USA
| | | | - Garret Choby
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
- Department of Neurologic Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bazan JG, Obeng-Gyasi S, Gamez ME. Reporting of Race and Hispanic Ethnicity in Breast Cancer Studies From the National Cancer Database. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1507-1509. [PMID: 36006628 PMCID: PMC9412833 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.3527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
This cohort study characterizes the inclusion of Hispanic ethnicity or ethnoracial categories in breast cancer studies from the National Cancer Database.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose G. Bazan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus
| | - Samilia Obeng-Gyasi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Prasad RN, Patel T, Perlow HK, Yildiz VO, Baliga S, Brownstein J, Gamez ME, Konieczkowski DJ, Royce TJ, Palmer JD. List Prices for Proton Radiation Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:e163-e168. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
15
|
Karivedu V, Bonomi M, Issa M, Blakaj A, Klamer BG, Pan X, Old M, Bhateja P, Kang S, Seim N, Ozer E, Agrawal A, Mitchell D, Gamez ME, Grecula J, Jhawar SR, Baliga S, Carrau RL, Rocco J, Blakaj D. Treatment Outcomes of Head and Neck Cancer Patients in the Elderly Receiving Different Chemoradiation Combinations: A Single-Center Experience. Oncol Res Treat 2021; 44:521-529. [PMID: 34515190 DOI: 10.1159/000518548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess the effect of definitive or adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) among elderly patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 150 elderly LA HNSCC patients (age ≥70) at a single institution. Demographics, disease control outcomes, and toxicities with different chemotherapy regimens were reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) estimates. RESULTS Median age at diagnosis was 74 years (range 70-88). Of the cohort, 98 (65.3%) patients received definitive and 52 (34.7%) received adjuvant CRT; 44 (29.3%) patients received weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel, 43 (28.7%) weekly cetuximab, 33 (22%) weekly carboplatin, and 30 (20%) weekly cisplatin. The OS at 2 years was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 63-79%), and PFS at 2 years was 61% (95% CI: 53-70%). There was no significant difference in OS or PFS between definitive and adjuvant CRT (p = 0.867 and p = 0.475, respectively). Type of chemotherapy regimen (single-agent carboplatin vs. others) (95% CI: 1.1-3.9; p = 0.009) was a key prognostic factor in predicting OS in multivariable analysis. Concurrent use of cetuximab was associated with increased risk of PEG tube dependence at 6 months (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Management of LA HNSCC in the elderly is a challenging scenario. Our study shows that CRT is a feasible treatment modality for elderly patients with LA HNSCC. We recommend CRT with weekly cisplatin or weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel. A chemotherapy regimen should be carefully selected in this difficult to treat population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vidhya Karivedu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA,
| | - Marcelo Bonomi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Majd Issa
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Adriana Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Brett G Klamer
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Xueliang Pan
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Matthew Old
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Priyanka Bhateja
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Stephen Kang
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Nolan Seim
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Enver Ozer
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Amit Agrawal
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Darrion Mitchell
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Mauricio E Gamez
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - John Grecula
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Sachin R Jhawar
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Sujith Baliga
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ricardo L Carrau
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - James Rocco
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Dukagjin Blakaj
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Balbach ML, Medina EF, Yang F, Carter RD, Shulman RM, Hatcher LA, Reggio F, Gamez ME, Martinez DA, Biancia CD, Li BC. IMRT 2.0: Refining an IMRT-Focused Telehealth Curriculum for Existing Radiation Oncology Centers in Latin America. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
17
|
Arnett ALH, Smith TL, Gamez ME, Jhawar SR. Haemichorea-haemiballism secondary to brain metastasis from undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. BMJ Case Rep 2021; 14:e242342. [PMID: 34400423 PMCID: PMC8378830 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2021-242342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea L H Arnett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Tamara L Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Mauricio E Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Sachin R Jhawar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gamez ME, Ma DJ. Deintensification Strategies Using Proton Beam Therapy for HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:223-233. [PMID: 34285949 PMCID: PMC8270104 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00073.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Oropharyngeal cancers related to the human papillomavirus are a growing segment of head and neck cancers throughout the world. These cancers are biologically and demographically unique with patients presenting at younger ages and with more curable disease. This combination of factors heightens the importance of normal tissue sparing because patients will live a long time with treatment sequelae. Proton therapy has demonstrated benefits in reducing normal tissue exposure, which may lead to less toxicity, a higher quality of life, less immunologic suppression, and lower cost. Research investigating deintensified radiation volumes and doses are also underway. These deintensification studies synergize well with the beam characteristics of proton beam therapy and can decrease that already reduced normal tissue exposure enabled by proton therapy. Future studies should refine patient selection to best allow for volume and dose reduction paired with proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauricio E. Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Daniel J. Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gamez ME, Patel SH, McGee LA, Sio TT, McDonald M, Phan J, Ma DJ, Foote RL, Rwigema JCM. A Systematic Review on Re-irradiation with Charged Particle Beam Therapy in the Management of Locally Recurrent Skull Base and Head and Neck Tumors. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:131-154. [PMID: 34285942 PMCID: PMC8270105 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00064.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the clinical outcomes and treatment related toxicities of charged particle-based re-irradiation (reRT; protons and carbon ions) for the definitive management of recurrent or second primary skull base and head and neck tumors. Materials and Methods The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were applied for the conduct of this systematic review. Published work in English language evaluating the role of definitive charged particle therapies in the clinical setting of reRT for recurrent or second primary skull base and head and neck tumors were eligible for this analysis. Results A total of 26 original studies (15 protons, 10 carbon ions, and 1 helium/neon studies) involving a total of 1,118 patients (437 with protons, 670 with carbon ions, and 11 with helium/neon) treated with curative-intent charged particle reRT were included in this systematic review. All studies were retrospective in nature, and the majority of them (n=23, 88 %) were reported as single institution experiences (87% for protons, and 90% for carbon ion-based studies). The median proton therapy reRT dose was 64.5 Gy (RBE 1.1) (range, 50.0 – 75.6 Gy ), while the median carbon ion reRT dose was 53.8 Gy (RBE 2.5 – 3.0) (range, 44.8 – 60 Gy ). Induction and/or concurrent chemotherapy was administered to 232 (53%) of the patients that received a course of proton reRT, and 122 (18%) for carbon ion reRT patients. ReRT with protons achieved 2-year local control rates ranging from 50% to 86%, and 41% to 92% for carbon ion reRT. The 2-year overall survival rates for proton and carbon ion reRT ranged from 33% to 80%, and 50% to 86% respectively. Late ≥ G3 toxicities ranged from 0% to 37%, with brain necrosis, ototoxicity, visual deficits, and bleeding as the most common complications. Grade 5 toxicities for all treated patients occurred in 1.4% (n= 16/1118) with fatal bleeding as the leading cause. Conclusions Based on current data, curative intent skull base and head and neck reRT with charged particle radiotherapy is feasible and safe in well-selected cases, associated with comparable or potentially improved local control and toxicity rates compared to historical reRT studies using photon radiotherapy. Prospective multi-institutional studies reporting oncologic outcomes, toxicity, and dosimetric treatment planning data are warranted to further validate these findings and to improve the understanding of the clinical benefits of charged particle radiotherapy in the reRT setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauricio E Gamez
- Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University - The James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Lisa A McGee
- Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Mark McDonald
- Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel J Ma
- Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Palmer JD, Gamez ME, Ranta K, Ruiz-Garcia H, Peterson JL, Blakaj DM, Prevedello D, Carrau R, Mahajan A, Chaichana KL, Trifiletti DM. Radiation therapy strategies for skull-base malignancies. J Neurooncol 2020; 150:445-462. [PMID: 32785868 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03569-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The management of skull base malignancies continues to evolve with improvements in surgical technique, advances in radiation delivery and novel systemic agents. METHODS In this review, we aim to discuss in detail the management of common skull base pathologies which typically require multimodality therapy, focusing on the radiotherapeutic aspects of care. RESULTS Technological advances in the administration of radiation therapy have led to a wide variety of different treatment strategies for the treatment of skull base malignances, with outcomes summarized herein. CONCLUSION Radiation treatment plays a key and critical role in the management of patients with skull base tumors. Recent advancements continue to improve the risk/benefit ratio for radiotherapy in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - M E Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - K Ranta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - H Ruiz-Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - J L Peterson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - D M Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - D Prevedello
- Department of Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - R Carrau
- Department of Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - A Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - K L Chaichana
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - D M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA. .,Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
London NR, Mohyeldin A, Daoud G, Gamez ME, Blakaj D, Bonomi M, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL. Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: Institutional trend toward induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiation. Head Neck 2020; 42:3197-3205. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.26357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Revised: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nyall R. London
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland USA
- Sinonasal and Skull Base Tumor Program National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, NIH Bethesda Maryland USA
| | - Ahmed Mohyeldin
- Department of Neurosurgery The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA
- Department of Neurosurgery Stanford University Palo Alto California USA
| | - Georges Daoud
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA
| | - Mauricio E. Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA
| | - Dukagjin Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA
| | - Marcelo Bonomi
- Department of Medical Oncology The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA
| | | | - Ricardo L. Carrau
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA
- Department of Neurosurgery The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gamez ME, Blakaj A, Zoller W, Bonomi M, Blakaj DM. Emerging Concepts and Novel Strategies in Radiation Therapy for Laryngeal Cancer Management. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12061651. [PMID: 32580375 PMCID: PMC7352689 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 06/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma is the second most common head and neck cancer. Its pathogenesis is strongly associated with smoking. The management of this disease is challenging and mandates multidisciplinary care. Currently, accepted treatment modalities include surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy—all focused on improving survival while preserving organ function. Despite changes in smoking patterns resulting in a declining incidence of laryngeal cancer, the overall outcomes for this disease have not improved in the recent past, likely due to changes in treatment patterns and treatment-related toxicities. Here, we review emerging concepts and novel strategies in the use of radiation therapy in the management of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma that could improve the relationship between tumor control and normal tissue damage (therapeutic ratio).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauricio E. Gamez
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (W.Z.); (D.M.B.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Adriana Blakaj
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, 35 Park St., New Haven, CT 06519, USA;
| | - Wesley Zoller
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (W.Z.); (D.M.B.)
| | - Marcelo Bonomi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 320 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA;
| | - Dukagjin M. Blakaj
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (W.Z.); (D.M.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rayfield CA, Grady F, De Leon G, Rockne R, Carrasco E, Jackson P, Vora M, Johnston SK, Hawkins-Daarud A, Clark-Swanson KR, Whitmire S, Gamez ME, Porter A, Hu L, Gonzalez-Cuyar L, Bendok B, Vora S, Swanson KR. Distinct Phenotypic Clusters of Glioblastoma Growth and Response Kinetics Predict Survival. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2019; 2:1-14. [PMID: 30652553 DOI: 10.1200/cci.17.00080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite the intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity seen in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), there is little definitive data on the underlying cause of the differences in patient survivals. Serial imaging assessment of tumor growth allows quantification of tumor growth kinetics (TGK) measured in terms of changes in the velocity of radial expansion seen on imaging. Because a systematic study of this entire TGK phenotype-growth before treatment and during each treatment to recurrence -has never been coordinately studied in GBMs, we sought to identify whether patients cluster into discrete groups on the basis of their TGK. PATIENTS AND METHODS From our multi-institutional database, we identified 48 patients who underwent maximally safe resection followed by radiotherapy with imaging follow-up through the time of recurrence. The patients were then clustered into two groups through a k-means algorithm taking as input only the TGK before and during treatment. RESULTS There was a significant survival difference between the clusters ( P = .003). Paradoxically, patients among the long-lived cluster had significantly larger tumors at diagnosis ( P = .027) and faster growth before treatment ( P = .003) but demonstrated a better response to adjuvant chemotherapy ( P = .048). A predictive model was built to identify which cluster patients would likely fall into on the basis of information that would be available to clinicians immediately after radiotherapy (accuracy, 90.3%). CONCLUSION Dichotomizing the heterogeneity of GBMs into two populations-one faster growing yet more responsive with increased survival and one slower growing yet less responsive with shorter survival-suggests that many patients who receive standard-of-care treatments may get better benefit from select alternative treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corbin A Rayfield
- Corbin A. Rayfield, Fillan Grady, Gustavo De Leon, Eduardo Carrasco, Pamela Jackson, Mayur Vora, Sandra K. Johnston, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud, Kamala R. Clark-Swanson, Scott Whitmire, Mauricio E. Gamez, Alyx Porter, Leland Hu, Bernard Bendok, Sujay Vora, and Kristin R. Swanson, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Russell Rockne, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and Sandra K. Johnston and Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Fillan Grady
- Corbin A. Rayfield, Fillan Grady, Gustavo De Leon, Eduardo Carrasco, Pamela Jackson, Mayur Vora, Sandra K. Johnston, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud, Kamala R. Clark-Swanson, Scott Whitmire, Mauricio E. Gamez, Alyx Porter, Leland Hu, Bernard Bendok, Sujay Vora, and Kristin R. Swanson, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Russell Rockne, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and Sandra K. Johnston and Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Gustavo De Leon
- Corbin A. Rayfield, Fillan Grady, Gustavo De Leon, Eduardo Carrasco, Pamela Jackson, Mayur Vora, Sandra K. Johnston, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud, Kamala R. Clark-Swanson, Scott Whitmire, Mauricio E. Gamez, Alyx Porter, Leland Hu, Bernard Bendok, Sujay Vora, and Kristin R. Swanson, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Russell Rockne, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and Sandra K. Johnston and Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Russell Rockne
- Corbin A. Rayfield, Fillan Grady, Gustavo De Leon, Eduardo Carrasco, Pamela Jackson, Mayur Vora, Sandra K. Johnston, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud, Kamala R. Clark-Swanson, Scott Whitmire, Mauricio E. Gamez, Alyx Porter, Leland Hu, Bernard Bendok, Sujay Vora, and Kristin R. Swanson, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Russell Rockne, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and Sandra K. Johnston and Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Eduardo Carrasco
- Corbin A. Rayfield, Fillan Grady, Gustavo De Leon, Eduardo Carrasco, Pamela Jackson, Mayur Vora, Sandra K. Johnston, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud, Kamala R. Clark-Swanson, Scott Whitmire, Mauricio E. Gamez, Alyx Porter, Leland Hu, Bernard Bendok, Sujay Vora, and Kristin R. Swanson, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Russell Rockne, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and Sandra K. Johnston and Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Pamela Jackson
- Corbin A. Rayfield, Fillan Grady, Gustavo De Leon, Eduardo Carrasco, Pamela Jackson, Mayur Vora, Sandra K. Johnston, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud, Kamala R. Clark-Swanson, Scott Whitmire, Mauricio E. Gamez, Alyx Porter, Leland Hu, Bernard Bendok, Sujay Vora, and Kristin R. Swanson, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Russell Rockne, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and Sandra K. Johnston and Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Mayur Vora
- Corbin A. Rayfield, Fillan Grady, Gustavo De Leon, Eduardo Carrasco, Pamela Jackson, Mayur Vora, Sandra K. Johnston, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud, Kamala R. Clark-Swanson, Scott Whitmire, Mauricio E. Gamez, Alyx Porter, Leland Hu, Bernard Bendok, Sujay Vora, and Kristin R. Swanson, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Russell Rockne, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and Sandra K. Johnston and Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Sandra K Johnston
- Corbin A. Rayfield, Fillan Grady, Gustavo De Leon, Eduardo Carrasco, Pamela Jackson, Mayur Vora, Sandra K. Johnston, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud, Kamala R. Clark-Swanson, Scott Whitmire, Mauricio E. Gamez, Alyx Porter, Leland Hu, Bernard Bendok, Sujay Vora, and Kristin R. Swanson, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Russell Rockne, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and Sandra K. Johnston and Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Andrea Hawkins-Daarud
- Corbin A. Rayfield, Fillan Grady, Gustavo De Leon, Eduardo Carrasco, Pamela Jackson, Mayur Vora, Sandra K. Johnston, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud, Kamala R. Clark-Swanson, Scott Whitmire, Mauricio E. Gamez, Alyx Porter, Leland Hu, Bernard Bendok, Sujay Vora, and Kristin R. Swanson, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Russell Rockne, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and Sandra K. Johnston and Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Kamala R Clark-Swanson
- Corbin A. Rayfield, Fillan Grady, Gustavo De Leon, Eduardo Carrasco, Pamela Jackson, Mayur Vora, Sandra K. Johnston, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud, Kamala R. Clark-Swanson, Scott Whitmire, Mauricio E. Gamez, Alyx Porter, Leland Hu, Bernard Bendok, Sujay Vora, and Kristin R. Swanson, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Russell Rockne, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and Sandra K. Johnston and Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Scott Whitmire
- Corbin A. Rayfield, Fillan Grady, Gustavo De Leon, Eduardo Carrasco, Pamela Jackson, Mayur Vora, Sandra K. Johnston, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud, Kamala R. Clark-Swanson, Scott Whitmire, Mauricio E. Gamez, Alyx Porter, Leland Hu, Bernard Bendok, Sujay Vora, and Kristin R. Swanson, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Russell Rockne, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and Sandra K. Johnston and Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Mauricio E Gamez
- Corbin A. Rayfield, Fillan Grady, Gustavo De Leon, Eduardo Carrasco, Pamela Jackson, Mayur Vora, Sandra K. Johnston, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud, Kamala R. Clark-Swanson, Scott Whitmire, Mauricio E. Gamez, Alyx Porter, Leland Hu, Bernard Bendok, Sujay Vora, and Kristin R. Swanson, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Russell Rockne, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and Sandra K. Johnston and Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Alyx Porter
- Corbin A. Rayfield, Fillan Grady, Gustavo De Leon, Eduardo Carrasco, Pamela Jackson, Mayur Vora, Sandra K. Johnston, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud, Kamala R. Clark-Swanson, Scott Whitmire, Mauricio E. Gamez, Alyx Porter, Leland Hu, Bernard Bendok, Sujay Vora, and Kristin R. Swanson, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Russell Rockne, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and Sandra K. Johnston and Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Leland Hu
- Corbin A. Rayfield, Fillan Grady, Gustavo De Leon, Eduardo Carrasco, Pamela Jackson, Mayur Vora, Sandra K. Johnston, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud, Kamala R. Clark-Swanson, Scott Whitmire, Mauricio E. Gamez, Alyx Porter, Leland Hu, Bernard Bendok, Sujay Vora, and Kristin R. Swanson, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Russell Rockne, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and Sandra K. Johnston and Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar
- Corbin A. Rayfield, Fillan Grady, Gustavo De Leon, Eduardo Carrasco, Pamela Jackson, Mayur Vora, Sandra K. Johnston, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud, Kamala R. Clark-Swanson, Scott Whitmire, Mauricio E. Gamez, Alyx Porter, Leland Hu, Bernard Bendok, Sujay Vora, and Kristin R. Swanson, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Russell Rockne, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and Sandra K. Johnston and Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Bernard Bendok
- Corbin A. Rayfield, Fillan Grady, Gustavo De Leon, Eduardo Carrasco, Pamela Jackson, Mayur Vora, Sandra K. Johnston, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud, Kamala R. Clark-Swanson, Scott Whitmire, Mauricio E. Gamez, Alyx Porter, Leland Hu, Bernard Bendok, Sujay Vora, and Kristin R. Swanson, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Russell Rockne, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and Sandra K. Johnston and Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Sujay Vora
- Corbin A. Rayfield, Fillan Grady, Gustavo De Leon, Eduardo Carrasco, Pamela Jackson, Mayur Vora, Sandra K. Johnston, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud, Kamala R. Clark-Swanson, Scott Whitmire, Mauricio E. Gamez, Alyx Porter, Leland Hu, Bernard Bendok, Sujay Vora, and Kristin R. Swanson, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Russell Rockne, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and Sandra K. Johnston and Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Kristin R Swanson
- Corbin A. Rayfield, Fillan Grady, Gustavo De Leon, Eduardo Carrasco, Pamela Jackson, Mayur Vora, Sandra K. Johnston, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud, Kamala R. Clark-Swanson, Scott Whitmire, Mauricio E. Gamez, Alyx Porter, Leland Hu, Bernard Bendok, Sujay Vora, and Kristin R. Swanson, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Russell Rockne, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and Sandra K. Johnston and Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sio TT, Blanchard MJ, Novotny PJ, Patel SH, Rwigema JCM, Pederson LD, McGee LA, Gamez ME, Seeger GR, Martenson JA, Grover Y, Neben Wittich MA, Garces YI, Foote RL, Miller RC, Halyard MY. N-Acetylcysteine Rinse for Thick Secretion and Mucositis of Head and Neck Chemoradiotherapy (Alliance MC13C2): A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Mayo Clin Proc 2019; 94:1814-1824. [PMID: 31405750 PMCID: PMC6742495 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.03.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Revised: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether N-acetylcysteine rinse was safe and could improve thickened secretions and dry mouth during and after radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS We designed a prospective pilot double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial (Alliance MC13C2). Adult patients (age ≥18 years) were enrolled if they underwent chemoradiotherapy (≥60 Gy). Patients initiated testing rinse within 3 days of starting radiotherapy. With swish-and-spit, they received 10% N-acetylcysteine (2500 mg daily) or placebo rinse solution 5 times daily during radiotherapy and 2 weeks postradiotherapy. The primary aim was to evaluate N-acetylcysteine in improvement of saliva viscosity with the Groningen Radiotherapy-Induced Xerostomia questionnaire. Secondary aims included evaluating xerostomia improvement by the same questionnaire and with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck-35 Questions survey and adverse-event profiles. The type I error rate was 20%. RESULTS Thirty-two patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were balanced for placebo (n=17) and N-acetylcysteine (n=15). N-acetylcysteine was better for improving sticky saliva (area under curve, P=.12). Scores of multiple secondary end points favored N-acetylcysteine, including sticky saliva daytime (P=.04), daytime and total xerostomia (both P=.02), pain (P=.18), and trouble with social eating (P=.15). Repeated measures models confirmed the findings. Taste was a major dissatisifer for N-acetylcysteine rinse; however, both testing rinses were safe and well tolerated overall. CONCLUSION Our pilot data showed that N-acetylcysteine rinse was safe and provided strong evidence of potential efficacy for improving thickened saliva and xerostomia by patient-reported outcome. A confirmatory phase 3 trial is required. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02123511.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Miran J Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Sanford Roger Maris Cancer Center, Fargo, ND
| | - Paul J Novotny
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Samir H Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | - Levi D Pederson
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Lisa A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Mauricio E Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Grant R Seeger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Altru Cancer Center, Grand Forks, ND
| | | | - Yvonne Grover
- Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Michelle A Neben Wittich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Robert L Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Robert C Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Michele Y Halyard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yu NY, Gamez ME, Hartsell WF, Tsai HK, Laramore GE, Larson GL, Simone CB, Rossi C, Katz SR, Buras MR, Golafshar MA, Vargas CE, Patel SH. A Multi-Institutional Experience of Proton Beam Therapy for Sinonasal Tumors. Adv Radiat Oncol 2019; 4:689-698. [PMID: 31673662 PMCID: PMC6817523 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Revised: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To report the outcomes of sinonasal tumors treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) on the Proton Collaborative Group registry study. Methods and Materials Sixty-nine patients with sinonasal tumors underwent curative intent PBT between 2010 and 2016. Patients who received de novo irradiation (42 patients) were analyzed separately from those who received reirradiation (27 patients) (re-RT). Median age was 53.1 years (range, 15.7-82.1; de novo) and 57.4 years (range, 31.3-88.0; re-RT). The most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma in both groups. Median PBT dose was 58.5 Gy (RBE) (range, 12-78.3; de novo) and 60.0 Gy (RBE) (range 18.2-72.3; re-RT), and median dose per fraction was 2.0 Gy (RBE) for both cohorts. Survival estimates for patients who received de novo irradiation and those who received re-RT were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Median follow-up for surviving patients was 26.4 months (range, 3.5-220.5). The 3-year overall survival (OS), freedom from distant metastasis, freedom from disease progression, and freedom from locoregional recurrence (FFLR) for de novo irradiation were 100%, 84.0%, 77.3%, and 92.9%, respectively. With re-RT, the 3-year OS, freedom from distant metastasis, FFDP, and FFLR were 76.2%, 47.4%, 32.1%, and 33.8%, respectively. In addition, 12 patients (17.4%) experienced recurrent disease. Re-RT was associated with inferior FFLR (P = .04). On univariate analysis, squamous cell carcinoma was associated with inferior OS (P < .01) for patients receiving re-RT. There were 11 patients with acute grade 3 toxicities. Late toxicities occurred in 15% of patients, with no grade ≥3 toxicities. No patients developed vision loss or symptomatic brain necrosis. Conclusions As one of the largest studies of sinonasal tumors treated with PBT, our findings suggest that PBT may be a safe and efficacious treatment option for patients with sinonasal tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Y Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - William F Hartsell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois
| | - Henry K Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, New Jersey
| | - George E Laramore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Gary L Larson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Carl Rossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, California Protons Cancer Therapy Center, San Diego, California
| | - Sanford R Katz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Willis-Knighton Cancer Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Matthew R Buras
- Division of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | | - Carlos E Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Samir H Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Stauch Z, Zoller W, Tedrick K, Walston S, Christ D, Hunzeker A, Lenards N, Culp L, Gamez ME, Blakaj D. An evaluation of adaptive planning by assessing the dosimetric impact of weight loss throughout the course of radiotherapy in bilateral treatment of head and neck cancer patients. Med Dosim 2019; 45:52-59. [PMID: 31221447 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2019.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Revised: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the dosimetric impact of weight loss in head and neck (H&N) patients and examine the effectiveness of adaptive planning. Data was collected from 22 H&N cancer patients who experienced weight loss during their course of radiotherapy. The robustness of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) treatment plans were compared including the potential need for replanning. The dosimetric impact of weight loss was evaluated by calculating a verification plan for each patient on an assessment CT scan taken during the course of treatment. Using a regression analysis, significance was tested for the dosimetric change in target volumes and 10 specific organs at risk (OAR) using an anatomical separation difference in the H&N at corresponding levels. For both the IMRT and VMAT plans, a significant correlation was found for the dose to 5% of the high risk Planning Target Volume (PTV) (D5), dose to 95% of the intermediate risk PTV and Clinical Target Volume (CTV) (D95), and the percentage of the pharynx receiving 65 Gy. An independent t-test was also performed for each metric in the VMAT and IMRT plans showing the dose to 95% of the intermediate risk PTV as significant. No quantitative method for finding the threshold of anatomical separation difference requiring a replan was established. Based on the increase in dose to organs at risk and increased target coverage due to separation loss, it was concluded that adaptive radiotherapy may not always be necessary when alignment of bony anatomy and remaining soft tissue is within tolerance. Physician judgment and preference is needed in such situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Stauch
- Medical Dosimetry Program at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI 54601, USA
| | - Wesley Zoller
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| | - Kayla Tedrick
- Medical Dosimetry Program at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI 54601, USA
| | - Steve Walston
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Daniel Christ
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Ashley Hunzeker
- Medical Dosimetry Program at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI 54601, USA
| | - Nishele Lenards
- Medical Dosimetry Program at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI 54601, USA
| | - Lee Culp
- Medical Dosimetry Program at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI 54601, USA
| | - Mauricio E Gamez
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Dukagjin Blakaj
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Blakaj A, Bonomi M, Gamez ME, Blakaj DM. Oral mucositis in head and neck cancer: Evidence-based management and review of clinical trial data. Oral Oncol 2019; 95:29-34. [PMID: 31345391 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2018] [Revised: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Oral Mucositis (OM) continues to be an oncologic challenge in the context of antineoplastic therapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. It is a dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy and radiation treatment and negatively impacts quality of life and cancer treatment efficacy. Significant effort in the field of OM has been made to help alleviate its symptoms and its subsequent clinical and economic impact. Despite these advances, the treatment of oral mucositis remains difficult and focuses on palliative measures. There are, however, many promising new biological targets currently undergoing investigation to ameliorate or help prevent the toxicity of OM in HNC. Some of these targets undergoing investigation in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials are further highlighted along with the pathobiology of OM, clinical course, prevention, and management measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana Blakaj
- Yale School of Medicine, Department of Therapeutic Radiology, 35 Park St., New Haven, CT 06519, USA
| | - Marcelo Bonomi
- The Ohio State University, Division of Medical Oncology, 320 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Mauricio E Gamez
- The Ohio State University, Department of Radiation Oncology, 460 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Dukagjin M Blakaj
- The Ohio State University, Department of Radiation Oncology, 460 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Anand A, Bues M, Gamez ME, Stefan C, Patel SH. Individual Field Simultaneous Optimization (IFSO) in spot scanning proton therapy of head and neck cancers. Med Dosim 2019; 44:375-378. [PMID: 30871863 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2019.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Revised: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
In order to better spare organs at risk in the head and neck, the application of proton beam therapy is of great interest. In this study we report the clinical utilization of a novel and robust scanning proton beam therapy treatment planning method called Individual Field Simultaneous Optimization (IFSO) that incorporates the advantages of field patching technique integrated with simultaneous optimization of multiple fields. A treatment planning intercomparison between a conventional Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Treatment Plan with single target volume vs a split target volume utilizing IFSO method demonstrates superiority of IFSO with regards to sparing of organs at risk and plan robustness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aman Anand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| | - Martin Bues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Corbin Stefan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Samir H Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
|
30
|
Gamez ME, Jeans E, Hinni ML, Moore E, Young G, Ma D, McGee L, Buras MR, Patel SH. Outcomes and patterns of failure of sarcomatoid carcinoma of the larynx: The Mayo Clinic experience. Laryngoscope 2017; 128:373-377. [PMID: 28681992 DOI: 10.1002/lary.26725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Revised: 04/24/2017] [Accepted: 05/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS Sarcomatoid carcinoma is a rare variant of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. No consensus exists on its management. Our aim was to present our outcomes. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective study. Median follow-up 45 months. METHODS There were 38 patients with pathologically confirmed sarcomatoid carcinoma of the larynx treated at the Mayo Clinic from 1990 to 2014. Statistical analysis of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The majority of patients were elderly males (92%) with a smoking history (74%) presenting with early-stage disease (71%). Surgery alone was the primary treatment in 27 patients (71%). Nine patients (25%) were treated with adjuvant radiation due to initial stage or high-risk pathologic features. Median radiation dose to the primary/surgical bed was 65 Gy (range, 60.3-75.0 Gy). A total of 15 patients (39%) had tumor recurrence, majority being local (n = 12). Sixty percent (n = 9) had multiple local recurrences. Five-year OS, PFS, and LC were 63%, 46%, and 72%, respectively. Subgroup analysis by stage I versus higher stages (II-IV) showed an OS of 80% versus 43% (P = .030), PFS of 65% versus 18% (P = .003), and LC of 84% versus 57% (P = .039). CONCLUSIONS Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the larynx is rare, and frequently presents at an early stage in older men with history of smoking. Based on our outcomes and patterns of failure, it appears early-stage tumors are treated appropriately with single-modality therapy, whereas more advanced tumors require multimodality therapy. Validation in a larger cohort is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4. Laryngoscope, 128:373-377, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauricio E Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A
| | | | - Michael L Hinni
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A
| | - Eric Moore
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A
| | - Geoffrey Young
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, U.S.A
| | - Daniel Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A
| | - Lisa McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A
| | - Matthew R Buras
- Division of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A
| | - Samir H Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gamez ME, Lal D, Halyard MY, Wong WW, Vargas C, Ma D, Ko SJ, Foote RL, Patel SH. Outcomes and patterns of failure for sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC): The Mayo Clinic Experience. Head Neck 2017; 39:1819-1824. [PMID: 28561906 DOI: 10.1002/hed.24834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2016] [Revised: 03/02/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) is a rare aggressive disease arising in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses with poor prognosis and unclear optimal management. METHODS Forty patients were analyzed. Nasal cavity was the most common primary site. Most patients presented with T4 disease, received trimodality therapy, and were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). RESULTS Median follow-up was 6.9 years. Sixteen patients (40%) experienced recurrent disease, 5 local (12.5%), 1 regional (2.5%), and 10 distant (25%). The 5-year overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and locoreginal control (LRC) were 44%, 39%, and 71%, respectively. Patients treated with trimodality therapy had better outcomes compared to single modality therapy. Improved OS was noted with IMRT and with doses ≥60 Gy. The most common cause of death was distant metastasis. CONCLUSION SNUC is an aggressive malignancy with a high tendency to metastasize. Better outcomes were obtained with a trimodality approach. Modern radiotherapy (RT) techniques and doses ≥ 60 Gy were associated with improved OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Devyani Lal
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - William W Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Carlos Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Daniel Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Stephen J Ko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Robert L Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Samir H Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hu KS, Mourad WF, Gamez ME, Lin W, Jacobson AS, Persky MS, Urken ML, Culliney BE, Li Z, Tran TN, Schantz SP, Chadha J, Harrison LB. Five-year outcomes of an oropharynx-directed treatment approach for unknown primary of the head and neck. Oral Oncol 2017. [PMID: 28622886 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (SCCHNUP) is commonly treated with comprehensive radiation to the laryngopharynx and bilateral necks. In 1998, we established a departmental policy to treat SCCHNUP with radiation directed to the oropharynx and bilateral neck. METHODS From 1998-2011, 60 patients were treated - N1: 18%, N2: 75% and N3: 7%. 82% underwent neck dissection. 55% received IMRT and 62% underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS At median follow-up of 54months, 5 patients failed regionally and 4 emerged with a primary (tongue base, hypopharynx and thoracic esophagus). Five-year rates of regional control, primary emergence, distant metastasis, disease-free survival and overall survival were 90%, 10%, 20%, 72% and 79%, respectively. The 5year rate of primary emergence in a non-oropharynx site was 3%. CONCLUSION This is the first demonstration that an oropharynx-directed approach yields low rates of primary emergence in SCCHNUP with excellent oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Shung Hu
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
| | - Waleed Fouad Mourad
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA, United States
| | - Mauricio E Gamez
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
| | - Wilson Lin
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai at Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Adam Saul Jacobson
- Dept of Otolaryngology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Mark Stephen Persky
- Dept of Otolaryngology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Mark L Urken
- Dept of Otolaryngology, Mount Sinai at Beth Israel, New York, NY, United States
| | - Bruce E Culliney
- Dept of Medicine, Mount Sinai at Beth Israel, New York, NY, United States
| | - Zujun Li
- Dept of Medicine, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Theresa Nguyen Tran
- Dept of Otolaryngology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Juskaran Chadha
- Dept of Medicine, Mount Sinai at Roosevelt Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gamez ME, Agarwal M, Hu KS, Lukens JN, Harrison LB. Hypofractionated Palliative Radiotherapy with Concurrent Radiosensitizing Chemotherapy for Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Using the "QUAD-SHOT Regimen". Anticancer Res 2017; 37:685-691. [PMID: 28179317 DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2017] [Revised: 01/27/2017] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
AIM To analyze the outcomes using the hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy regimen "QUAD-Shot" with concurrent radiosensitizing chemotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed twenty-one patients with newly-diagnosed or recurrent head and neck cancer treated with palliative hypofractionated concurrent chemoradiation using the QUAD-Shot regimen. RESULTS All patients received at least one cycle of RT, with sixteen patients (76%) completing all three cycles. 85.7 % of patients had objective response to therapy with five patients (23.8%) demonstrating complete response (CR) and thirteen patients (61.9%) demonstrating partial response (PR). Palliation of symptoms was achieved in all (100%) of the sixteen patients that completed the three cycles. Median overall survival and median progression-free survival were 7 and 4 months, respectively. CONCLUSION QUAD-Shot palliative radiation therapy coupled with radiosensitizing chemotherapy is efficacious and well-tolerated in patients with newly-diagnosed or recurrent head and neck cancer not amenable to curative therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauricio E Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, U.S.A.
| | - Manuj Agarwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, U.S.A
| | - Kenneth S Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University, New York, NY, U.S.A
| | - John N Lukens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A
| | - Louis B Harrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Gamez ME, Halyard MY, Hinni ML, Hayden RE, Nagel TH, Vargas CE, Wong WW, Curtis KK, Zarka MA, Ma D, Patel SH. Mucosal Sparing Radiation Therapy in Resected Oropharyngeal Cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2017; 126:185-191. [PMID: 28056518 DOI: 10.1177/0003489416681580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the outcomes of patients with favorable risk oropharyngeal cancer that underwent adjuvant radiation therapy with omission of the primary site from the clinical target volume (CTV). MATERIAL/METHODS A retrospective study of 40 patients treated with transoral surgery (TOS) followed by neck only radiation using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with exclusion of the primary site. For all patients, a CTV of the primary surgical bed was contoured to obtain the estimated incidental dose to the primary site. RESULTS Median follow-up was 51 months (range, 13-155 months). The median radiation therapy (RT) dose to the neck was 6000 cGy (range, 5400-6400 cGy). The mean incidental dose to the primary tonsillar site was 4320 cGy (SD ± 480 cGy) and to the primary base of tongue site was 4060 cGy (SD ± 420 cGy). There were no local failures and only 1 regional failure, resulting in 97.5% locoregional control rate at 4 years. Two patients developed distant metastases, without evidence of locoregional recurrence, for a 4-year overall survival rate of 97%. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis suggests that mucosal sparing RT after TOS in favorable risk oropharyngeal cancer patients may provide comparable oncologic and improved functional outcomes compared to conventional treatment in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauricio E Gamez
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Michael L Hinni
- 2 Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Thomas H Nagel
- 2 Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Carlos E Vargas
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - William W Wong
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Kelly K Curtis
- 3 Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Matthew A Zarka
- 4 Department of Medicine-Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Daniel Ma
- 5 Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Samir H Patel
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ugurluer G, Chang K, Gamez ME, Arnett AL, Jayakrishnan R, Miller RC, Sio TT. Genome-based Mutational Analysis by Next Generation Sequencing in Patients with Malignant Pleural and Peritoneal Mesothelioma. Anticancer Res 2016; 36:2331-2338. [PMID: 27127140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2016] [Accepted: 04/13/2016] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Malignant mesothelioma is a rare malignancy with limited therapeutic options. Exome-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques may direct the future of molecular targeting and improve systemic therapies for patients with mesothelioma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eleven patients with NGS testing were selected, with a total of 236 somatic cancer-related mutations analyzed. Descriptive and Kaplan-Meier statistics were applied. RESULTS The median age was 65 years (range=27-73 years); 4 (36%) patients were females. Seven (64%) and four patients (36%) had pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma, respectively. Detectable mutations were found in 86% of the pleural and 50% of the peritoneal mesothelioma patients (overall, 73% of patients). The families of BAP1 (36%), CDKNA2A/B (27%) and NF2 (27%) represented the most frequently mutated genes. The median overall survival for all patients was 20.8 months, with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 91% and 40%, respectively. CONCLUSION Genomic alterations as potential therapeutic targets were found by NGS. These findings will help in the development of new screening tools and targeting therapies, and in turn impact the standard-of-care and potentially lengthen disease control and survival periods in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gamze Ugurluer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, U.S.A. Department of Radiation Oncology, Acibadem Adana Hospital, Acibadem University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Kenneth Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, U.S.A
| | - Mauricio E Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, U.S.A
| | - Andrea L Arnett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, U.S.A
| | | | - Robert C Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, U.S.A. Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, U.S.A
| | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Mourad WF, Hu KS, Shasha D, Concert C, Ishihara D, Lin W, Shourbaji RA, Ryniak M, Gamez ME, Lukens JN, Li Z, Culliney BE, Khorsandi AS, Tran T, Jacobson A, Manolidis S, Schantz S, Urken M, Persky MS, Harrison LB. Initial experience with oropharynx-targeted radiation therapy for metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary of the head and neck. Anticancer Res 2014; 34:243-248. [PMID: 24403470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
AIM Metastasis of unknown primary (MUP) is commonly treated with radiation therapy (RT) to the entire mucosal surfaces and bilateral neck nodes (LN). We report outcomes of oropharynx-targeted RT, retropharyngeal nodes (RPN) and bilateral LN in this context. PATIENTS AND METHODS Single-Institution retrospective study of 68 patients. Forty percent were treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Fifty-six percent received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). The median age was 58 years, 82% were Caucasian, and 75% males. Stage III disease was present in 9%, stage IVA in 75% and IVB in 16%. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 3.5 years, the actuarial locoregional control was 95.5%. The emergence of primary developed in 1patient (1.5%) and 2patients (3%) failed in the neck. The median time-to-locoregional failure (LRF) was 18 months. Actuarial long-term RT toxicity was grade 1 xerostomia (68%), dysphagia (35%), neck stiffness (15%) and trismus (6%). CONCLUSION RT to the oropharynx, RPN, and bilateral neck provides excellent oncological and functional outcomes in MUP in non-Asian patients. Sparing the mucosal surfaces of the nasopharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx seems reasonable without impacting on survival and locoregional control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waleed F Mourad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Medical Center (BIMC), Continuum Cancer Centers of New York (CCCNY), 10 Union Square E. Suite 4 G, New York, NY 10003, U.S.A.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mourad WF, Hu KS, Shasha D, Concert C, Ishihara D, Lin W, Gamez ME, Lukens JN, Shourbaji RA, Ryniak M, Li Z, Culliney BE, Khorsandi AS, Tran T, Jacobson A, Manolidis S, Schantz S, Urken M, Persky MS, Harrison LB. Long-term outcome of seropositive HIV patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Anticancer Res 2013; 33:5511-5516. [PMID: 24324090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
AIM To report the outcome of radiation therapy (RT) +/- chemotherapy in HIV-seropositive patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS This is the largest single-Institution retrospective study to date, consisting of 73 HIV patients with HNSCC treated from January 1997-2010. The median age at RT, HIV diagnosis and the duration of patients being HIV seropositive were 51, 34, and 11 years, respectively. Seventy patients had SCC and one had submandibular salivary duct carcinoma. Stages I-II, III and IVA/B were: 22%, 27% and 51%, respectively. Primary cancer sites comprised the larynx (37%), oropharynx (32%), oral cavity (13%), hypopharynx (7%), nasopharynx (4%), unknown primary (MUP) (4%), nasal cavity (3%), and submandibular salivary duct (1%). All patients had an ECOG performance scale of ≤1 and were treated with RT +/- chemotherapy. Fifty patients (70%) were on highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART) during treatment, and the median CD4 count was 290 (range: 203-1142). Median dose of 70, 63, and 54 Gy were delivered to the gross disease, high-risk neck, and low-risk neck respectively. Median duration of treatment was 52 (range: 49-64) days. Twelve patients (17%) underwent neck dissection for N3 disease. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 47 months (range: 7-140), the 4-year locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS) were 69% and 55% respectively. Seven patients (10%) developed second primary sites within the first 5 years of completing RT (2 anal SCCs and 5 HNSCCs). The LRC for Stages III/IV larynx and oropharynx SCC (which represent the majority of the cohort) were 76% and 70%, respectively. Chemo/RT-related late toxicities were dysphagia of grade≤2, 3, and 4 found in 74%, 15% and 11% of patients, respectively. Hoarseness (grade 1) was reported in 10% of patients; no patient experienced grade ≥2. Xerostomia grade ≤2, and 3 was found in 77% and 23% of patients, respectively. A Chi-square test and univariate analysis showed statistically significant relationships between LRC and duration of RT (p<0.001), as well as positive trends for weight loss (<10%) and absence of second malignancy. CONCLUSION Definitive RT +/- chemotherapy for HIV-seropositive patients with HNSCC appears to be less effective compared to the observed rates of LRC and OS of other HNSCC without HIV. Due to advances in the HAART which prolongs HIV patients' survival, it is extremely important to establish better treatment strategies to improve therapeutic ratio in this growing patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waleed F Mourad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Medical Center (BIMC), Continuum Cancer Centers of New York (CCCNY), 10 Union Square E. Suite 4 G, New York, NY, 10003, U.S.A.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|