Efficacy and safety of pravastatin vs simvastatin after cardiac transplantation

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Statin Therapy on Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Most of the mortality after Heart Transplantation (HT) is attributed to severe cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and rejection.

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of postoperative statin therapy on outcomes (mortality, rejection, and CAV in HT patients).

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed on publications between 1980 and October 2023 in Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and Embase databases. Heterogeneity was assessed using Chi-square, I2, and forest plots. Publication bias was evaluated using Begg's and Egger's tests. Analyses were performed in Stata 15 with significance at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 17 studies comprising 4,627 participants and conducted between 1995 to 2021. Compared to non-users, the odds of mortality were lower among statin users (OR= 0.49, 95% CI: 0.32-0.75, p < 0.001). The odds of CAV were also reduced with statin use (OR= 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53-0.96, p = 0.027). The odds of rejection were not significantly different (OR= 0.69, 95% CI: 0.41-1.15, p = 0.152). However, rejection odds were lower with statins in RCTs (OR= 0.42, 95% CI: 0.21-0.82, p = 0.012) but not in case-control studies (OR= 0.87, 95% CI: 0.49-1.52, p = 0.615). No publication bias was observed with Begg's test, but Egger's test showed possible bias.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis found postoperative statin use associated with lower mortality and CAV, but not overall rejection, though RCT subgroup analysis showed decreased rejection with statins. Statin therapy may improve prognosis in HT patients.

Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level Trends and the Development of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy After Heart Transplantation

Background

Unlike the relationship with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, that between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is unclear. Our objectives were to characterize lipid profiles early after heart transplantation (HT) and evaluate the relationship between early LDL-C and the development of CAV.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive adults who underwent HT at 2 centres during the time period 2010-2018. The primary outcome was the incidence of angiographic CAV. The relationship between LDL-C and CAV was assessed using Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models adjusted a priori for clinically important covariates, including recipient and donor age, recipient sex, ischemic time, and pre-HT diabetes.

Results

A total of 386 patients followed for a median (range) of 4.4 (2.8-6.8) years were included. LDL-C at baseline (2.11 ± 0.86 mmol/L) and 1 year after HT (2.20 ± 0.88 mmol/L) was similar (P = 0.21), but it was lower at the end of follow-up (1.89 ± 0.74 mmol/L, P < 0.01). Of 309 patients who underwent angiography, 54% had CAV. The risk of CAV did not vary according to baseline, 1-year, or change from baseline to 1-year LDL-C. The odds of CAV at 1 year were equally likely across LDL-C values (adjusted odds ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.61-1.63 for baseline, and adjusted odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval: 0.74-2.10 for 1-year LDL-C).

Conclusions

No association was identified between early LDL-C and the development of CAV. Our findings do not support targeting a specific LDL-C for patients who do not otherwise meet criteria for guideline-recommended LDL-C target levels. Randomized studies are warranted to determine if lipid-lowering to a specific LDL-C target level modifies the risk of CAV.

Choosing statins: a review to guide clinical practice

Statins are among the most widely prescribed medicines in the world and have proved their value in reducing cardiovascular events and mortality. Many patients report adverse effects that lead to interruption of treatment. This review aims to individualize statin treatment, considering efficacy for reducing cardiovascular risk and safety, in the setting of specific diseases, to minimize the side effects and improve compliance. We gathered evidence that may help clinicians to choose specific statins in different clinical situations, such as the risk of new diabetes, chronic kidney disease, liver disease, human immunodeficiency virus infection, organ transplant, heart failure and elderly people. Efficacy of statins is well established in a large number of clinical conditions. Therefore, main objective is to revise statin in specific clinical settings, based on pharmacokinetics, safety, drug metabolism and interactions to provide the best choice in different clinical scenarios.

First Reported Case of Rhabdomyolysis Associated with Concomitant Use of Cyclosporin, Diltiazem, and Simvastatin

Rhabdomyolysis is a syndrome with a wide range of symptoms ranging from asymptomatic raised serum creatinine kinase to life-threatening metabolic disturbances and acute kidney injury. A careful history taking and high clinical suspicion on drug-drug interaction are crucial to identify the etiology of rhabdomyolysis. Here, we present a case of rhabdomyolysis due to a rare drug-to-drug interaction of simvastatin, diltiazem, and cyclosporin in a patient with IgA nephropathy. Early renal replacement therapy was initiated, and the insulting agents were withheld. Despite the metabolic disturbances were corrected, the patient succumbed to possible venous thromboembolism event during the prolonged hospital stay. Therefore, heightened awareness is required in dealing with patients with glomerulonephritis who are frequently prescribed on polypharmacy, in order to reduce unwarranted adverse events.

The pharmaceutical management of cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major limitation to long-term survival after heart transplantation. Its peculiar pathophysiology involves multifactorial pathways including immune-mediated and metabolic risk factors, which are associated with the development of specific pathological lesions. The often diffuse and chronic nature of the disease reduces the effectiveness of revascularization procedures, and pharmacological prevention of the disease is the sole therapeutic approach with some proven efficacy.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, after briefly outlining the risk factors for CAV, the authors revise the potential pharmacological approaches that may reduce the burden of CAV. While several therapies have shown convincing efficacy in terms of CAV prevention diagnosed by coronary imaging, very few have been reported to improve prognosis with any meaningful level of evidence.

EXPERT OPINION

The authors believe that a customizable approach is necessary for clinical practice given the currently available evidence. Furthermore, it is important, in the future, to address the glaring therapeutic gap of an effective treatment against donor-specific antibodies, whose effect on endothelial injury is currently one of the major mechanisms of CAV development and for which no pharmacological treatment is currently available.

Statins with different lipophilic indices exert distinct effects on skeletal, cardiac and vascular smooth muscle

AIMS

Data concerning the influence of statin lipophilicity on the myotoxic and pleiotropic effects of statins is conflicting, and mechanistic head-to-head comparison studies evaluating this parameter are limited. In order to address the disparity, this mechanistic investigation aimed to assess the effects of two short-acting statins with different lipophilic indices on skeletal, cardiac and vascular smooth muscle physiology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Young female Wistar rats were randomised to simvastatin (80 mg kg^-1 day^-1), pravastatin (160 mg kg^-1 day^-1) or control treatment groups. Changes in functional muscle performance were assessed, as well as mRNA levels of genes relating to atrophy, hypertrophy, mitochondrial function and/or oxidative stress.

KEY FINDINGS

There were no significant differences in the mRNA profiles of isolated skeletal muscles amongst the treatment groups. In terms of skeleletal muscle performance, simvastatin reduced functionality but treatment with pravastatin significantly improved force production. Rodents given simvastatin demonstrated comparable myocardial integrity to the control group. Conversely, pravastatin reduced left ventricular action potential duration, diastolic stiffness and Mhc-β expression. Pravastatin improved endothelium-dependent relaxation, particularly in muscular arteries, but this effect was absent in the simvastatin-treated rats. The responsiveness of isolated blood vessels to noradrenaline also differed between the statin groups. The findings of this study support that the effects of statins on skeletal, cardiac and vascular smooth muscle vary with their lipophilic indices.

SIGNIFICANCE

The results of this work have important implications for elucidating the mechanisms responsible for the myotoxic and pleiotropic effects of statins.

Statin Safety and Associated Adverse Events: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

One in 4 Americans >40 years of age takes a statin to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and other complications of atherosclerotic disease. The most effective statins produce a mean reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of 55% to 60% at the maximum dosage, and 6 of the 7 marketed statins are available in generic form, which makes them affordable for most patients. Primarily using data from randomized controlled trials, supplemented with observational data where necessary, this scientific statement provides a comprehensive review of statin safety and tolerability. The review covers the general patient population, as well as demographic subgroups, including the elderly, children, pregnant women, East Asians, and patients with specific conditions such as chronic disease of the kidney and liver, human immunodeficiency viral infection, and organ transplants. The risk of statin-induced serious muscle injury, including rhabdomyolysis, is <0.1%, and the risk of serious hepatotoxicity is ≈0.001%. The risk of statin-induced newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus is ≈0.2% per year of treatment, depending on the underlying risk of diabetes mellitus in the population studied. In patients with cerebrovascular disease, statins possibly increase the risk of hemorrhagic stroke; however, they clearly produce a greater reduction in the risk of atherothrombotic stroke and thus total stroke, as well as other cardiovascular events. There is no convincing evidence for a causal relationship between statins and cancer, cataracts, cognitive dysfunction, peripheral neuropathy, erectile dysfunction, or tendonitis. In US clinical practices, roughly 10% of patients stop taking a statin because of subjective complaints, most commonly muscle symptoms without raised creatine kinase. In contrast, in randomized clinical trials, the difference in the incidence of muscle symptoms without significantly raised creatinine kinase in statin-treated compared with placebo-treated participants is <1%, and it is even smaller (0.1%) for patients who discontinued treatment because of such muscle symptoms. This suggests that muscle symptoms are usually not caused by pharmacological effects of the statin. Restarting statin therapy in these patients can be challenging, but it is important, especially in patients at high risk of cardiovascular events, for whom prevention of these events is a priority. Overall, in patients for whom statin treatment is recommended by current guidelines, the benefits greatly outweigh the risks.

Potential role of coenzyme Q10 in facilitating recovery from statin-induced rhabdomyolysis

Rhabdomyolysis is a rare, but serious complication of statin therapy, and represents the most severe end of the spectrum of statin-induced myotoxicity. We report a case where coenzyme Q10 facilitated recovery from statin-induced rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure, which had initially persisted despite statin cessation and haemodialysis. This observation is biologically plausible due to the recognised importance of coenzyme Q10 in mitochondrial bioenergetics within myocytes, and the fact that statins inhibit farnesyl pyrophosphate production, a biochemical step crucial for coenzyme Q10 synthesis. Coenzyme Q10 is generally well tolerated, and may potentially benefit patients with statin-induced rhabdomyolysis.

Mixed effects of OATP1B1, BCRP and NTCP polymorphisms on the population pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in healthy volunteers

1. Pravastatin is a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor used for the treatment of hyperlipidaemia. This study aims to investigate the effects of genetic polymorphisms in OATP1B1, BCRP and NTCP on pravastatin population pharmacokinetics in healthy Chinese volunteers using a non-linear mixed-effect modelling (NONMEM) approach. A two-compartment model with a first-order absorption and elimination described plasma pravastatin concentrations well. 2. Genetic polymorphisms of rs4149056 (OATP1B1) and rs2306283 (OATP1B1) were found to be associated with a significant (p < 0.01) decrease in the apparent clearance from the central compartment (CL/F), while rs2296651 (NTCP) increased CL/F to a significant degree (p < 0.01). The combination of these three polymorphisms reduced the inter-individual variability of CL/F by 78.8%. 3. There was minimal effect of rs2231137 (BCRP) and rs2231142 (BCRP) on pravastatin pharmacokinetics (0.01 < p < 0.05), whereas rs11045819 (OATP1B1), rs1061018 (BCRP) and rs61745930 (NTCP) genotypes do not appear to be associated with pravastatin pharmacokinetics based on the population model (p > 0.05). 4. The current data suggest that the combination of rs4149056, rs2306283 and rs2296651 polymorphisms is an important determinant of pravastatin pharmacokinetics.

The effect of statins on cardiac allograft survival

PURPOSE

In addition to having a lipid-lowering effect, statins also have an anti-inflammatory effect that may reduce allograft dysfunction by preventing cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and play an immunomodulatory role. We studied the effect of statins on cardiac allograft survival at the National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the patients undergoing heart transplantation at NTUH in the last 6 years. After transplantation, all patients received biochemical monitoring every month and echocardiographic examination regularly at NTUH. Protocol biopsy was performed in all except 18 pediatric patients. All patients received immunosuppressants, including tacrolimus or cyclosporine, everolimus or mycophenolate acid, and prednisolone. They were divided into statin and nonstatin groups according to whether or not a statin was taken.

RESULTS

At NTUH, from 2007 to 2012, 168 heart transplantations were performed. The ages of the patients ranged from 6 to 74 years old with male predominance. The etiology was mainly dilated cardiomyopathy (52.4%) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (39.3%), including 7 retransplantations from severe CAV with heart failure. Twenty-three patients (17%) suffered from acute rejection. The overall 1-year actuarial survival rate was 86% ± 2% and the 5-year survival rate was 79% ± 3%. Seventy-eight patients (57.4%) took statins and the statin group has a better 5-year survival rate and freedom from cardiac death survival rate (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that the use of statins after transplantation was associated with better survival.

[Heart and combined heart-lung transplantation. Indications, chances and risks]

Orthotopic heart transplantation (HTX) is nowadays the worldwide accepted gold standard for the treatment of terminal heart failure. The main indications for HTX are non-ischemic dilatative (54%) and ischemic (37%) heart failure. In the acute phase after HTX the survival rate is approximately 90%. Good short and long-term results with survival rates ranging from 81% after 1 year to more than 50% after 11 years demonstrate that there is currently no real treatment alternative to HTX for treatment of end-stage heart failure. In the case of irreversible pulmonary hypertension in combination with end-stage heart failure or complex congenital heart syndromes, a combined heart and lung transplantation (HLTX) is necessary. Compared with HTX the short-term survival of HLTX is reduced, mostly for technical reasons. Improved long-term results after HTX and HLTX are a result of highly specialized transplantation units and effective immunosuppression. However, a major problem is the shortage of organ donors in Germany and the resulting long waiting times for patients with frequently occurring blood groups of up to 10 months for transplantation. The consequence of the latter is the ever increasing number of implanted cardiac assist devices in patients not only as a bridge to transplant but also as destination therapy.

Clinical recommendations for the use of everolimus in heart transplantation

Proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs), everolimus (EVL), and sirolimus are a group of immunosuppressor agents indicated for the prevention of acute rejection in adult heart transplant recipients. Proliferation signal inhibitors have a mechanism of action with both immunosuppressive and antiproliferative effects, representing an especially interesting treatment option for the prevention and management of some specific conditions in heart transplant population, such as graft vasculopathy or malignancies. Proliferation signal inhibitors have been observed to work synergistically with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Data from clinical trials and from the growing clinical experience show that when administered concomitantly with CNIs, PSIs allow significant dose reductions of the latter without loss of efficacy, a fact that has been associated with stabilization or significant improvement in renal function in patients with CNI-induced nephrotoxicity. The purpose of this article was to review the current knowledge of the role of PSIs in heart transplantation to provide recommendations for the proper use of EVL in cardiac transplant recipients, including indications, treatment regimens, monitoring, and management of the adverse events.

[Current views on lipid metabolism: statin-induced myopathy]

Cardiovascular diseases are the most common causes of death in Germany and the prevalence is increased in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Statins are often employed for primary and secondary prophylaxis of cardiovascular events but can potentially induce myopathy as a side-effect. In addition to an asymptomatic elevation of muscle enzymes, myalgia and myositis as well as rhabdomyolysis, the most severe side-effect, have been observed, which are mostly manifested within 6 months after initiation of therapy. Statin-induced myopathy is rare but if risk factors are present, the individual risk can be much higher. Such factors are in particular interaction with other medications, statin dosage, the characteristics of the statin preparation used, comorbidities, age and sex of the patient. Regular testing of muscle enzymes after induction of statin therapy is not generally recommended for asymptomatic patients, but is indispensable when muscle symptoms appear. Statin therapy must be immediately terminated and a diagnostic evaluation must be carried out at the latest when creatine kinase values show a more than 10-fold increase.

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus: statins not associated with improved patient or graft survival

Background

The beneficial effects of early statin use in kidney transplant recipients, especially those on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, are not well established. We evaluated the predictors of statin use following kidney transplantation and examined its association with patient and allograft survival.

Methods

We examined 615 consecutive patients who underwent kidney transplant at our institution between January 1998 and January 2002. Statin use was assessed at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months following kidney transplant. Patients were followed for allograft and patient survival.

Results

36% of the 615 kidney transplant recipients were treated with statin treatment. Statin use increased over the course of the study period. Older age, elevated body mass index, higher triglyceride levels, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, history of myocardial infarction were associated with higher rates of statin use; elevated alkaline phosphatase levels and CMV IgG seropositivity were associated with less statin use. Older age, elevated BMI and hypercholesterolemia remained significant predictors of increased statin use after accounting for covariates using multiple regression. The early use of statins was not associated with improvements in unadjusted patient survival [HR 0.99; 95%CI 0.72-1.37] or graft survival [HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.76-1.24]. The risks of death and graft survival were not consistently reduced with exposure to statin using either adjusted models or propensity scores in Cox Proportional Hazards models.

Conclusions

In a kidney transplant population primarily receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, early statin use was not associated with significantly improved graft or patient survival.

[Medical complications of lung transplantation]

In 2010, lung transplantation is a valuable therapeutic option for a number of patients suffering from of end-stage non-neoplastic pulmonary diseases. The patients frequently regain a very good quality of life, however, long-term survival is often hampered by the development of complications such as the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, metabolic and infectious complications. As the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome is the first cause of death in the medium and long term, an intense immunosuppressive treatment is maintained for life in order to prevent or stabilize this complication. The immunosuppression on the other hand induces a number of potentially severe complications including metabolic complications, infections and malignancies. The most frequent metabolic complications are arterial hypertension, chronic renal insufficiency, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and osteoporosis. Bacterial, viral and fungal infections are the second cause of mortality. They are to be considered as medical emergencies and require urgent assessment and targeted therapy after microbiologic specimens have been obtained. They should not, under any circumstances, be treated empirically and it has also to be kept in mind that the lung transplant recipient may present several concomitant infections. The most frequent malignancies are skin cancers, the post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders, Kaposi's sarcoma and some types of bronchogenic carcinomas, head/neck and digestive cancers. Lung transplantation is no longer an exceptional procedure; thus, the pulmonologist will be confronted with such patients and should be able to recognize the symptoms and signs of the principal non-surgical complications. The goal of this review is to give a general overview of the most frequently encountered complications. Their assessment and treatment, though, will most often require the input of other specialists and a multidisciplinary and transversal approach.

The use of ciclosporin in psoriasis

Ciclosporin is a cyclic undecapeptide discovered in the 1970s to possess a potent inhibitory action on T lymphocytes. The subsequent discovery, in 1979, that it was remarkably effective in treatment of psoriasis transformed thinking about the nature of the disease, which subsequently became generally recognized as autoimmune in nature. Ciclosporin remains one of the most effective and rapidly acting treatments currently available for psoriasis. Virtually all the diverse manifestations of this disease can respond. The main side effects are nephrotoxicity and hypertension. There is considerable variation between individuals in susceptibility to these so careful monitoring is required. Ciclosporin should be used in single or intermittent short courses for all except the most severe cases as this is safer than continuous treatment. The rate of improvement depends very much on the dose, which ranges from 2 to 5.0 mg/kg/day. Ciclosporin can be combined with any topical treatment and a useful dose-sparing effect can be achieved in this way if patients are compliant. In severe cases ciclosporin is often used in combination with other systemic antipsoriatic drugs in order to spare the dose of each agent and reduce toxicity. Concurrent or intercurrent use of ultraviolet therapy is discouraged due to the increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer. This article reviews the mode of action, pharmacokinetics, indications, contraindications, side effects, dosage regimens, pretreatment screening and monitoring, drug interactions, and use of treatment combinations with ciclosporin in the management of psoriasis.

Simvastatin-Induced Rhabdomyolysis Following Cyclosporine Treatment for Uveitis

The purpose of this study was to heighten awareness of a potentially life-threatening drug interaction in patients with chronic uveitis treated with cyclosporine. A 69-year-old female with chronic posterior uveitis was treated with cyclosporine while on concomitant oral simvastatin for hypercholesterolemia. Rhabdomyolysis developed with acute renal failure from the probable interaction between these drugs. Discontinuation of simvastatin and cyclosporine resulted in resolution of rhabdomyolysis and normalization of renal function. Statins are associated with a small, dose-related risk of myopathy, myositis, and rhabdomyolysis. Cyclosporine is a potent inhibitor of simvastatin metabolism, and may therefore facilitate simvastatin-induced rhabdomyolysis. Concomitant use of statins and cyclosporine should be avoided.

The use of proliferation signal inhibitors in the prevention and treatment of allograft vasculopathy in heart transplantation

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) currently represents one of the most important causes of long-term morbidity and mortality in the heart transplant population. In well-designed studies with de novo patients, the use of proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs; everolimus and sirolimus) has been shown to significantly prevent the intimal growth of graft coronary arteries in comparison to other immunosuppressive regimens, reducing the incidence of vasculopathy at 12 and 24 months. In addition, conversion to PSIs in maintenance patients with established CAV has also shown promising results in the reduction of the progression of the disease and its clinical consequences. For these reasons the interest shown by various transplantation units in the potential role of PSIs in this field is growing. The aim of the present article is to review the information obtained to date on the use of PSIs in heart transplant recipients, both in the prevention and the treatment of CAV. The principal published recommendations on the introduction and appropriate management of these drugs in clinical practice are also collected, as well as certain recommendations given by the authors based on their experience.

Statins induce immunosuppressive effect on heterotopic limb allografts in rat through inhibiting T cell activation and proliferation

Long-term use of immunosuppressive agents could bring many side effects. Recently, 3-Hydroxy-3-methyl-gutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) have been reported to be immunomodulatory besides lowering serum cholesterol level. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of statins on composite tissue allografts and T lymphocyte in vivo and in vitro. Rats were divided into 5 groups: syngeneic transplantation group (Lewis-Lewis); allogeneic control group (Brown Norway-Lewis, no treatment); low-dose statins group (15 mg /kg); high-dose statins group (30 mg /kg) and cyclosporin A group. In vivo, treatment of statins significantly prolonged allografts survival as compared to control group. Histological findings further supported these clinical results and demonstrated less extent of rejection. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that there was a remarkably reduced T cells infiltration in statins groups. Moreover, the serum levels of IL-2 and IFN-gamma were decreased after statins therapy, while these in control group increased significantly. Meanwhile, transcriptional activities of IL-2 and IFN-gamma were also dramatically down-regulated after statins treatment. In vitro, mixed lymphocyte reaction assay was performed and the results revealed lymphocyte proliferation was inhibited by statins in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, administration of statins exhibited inhibitory effects on CD3/CD28 mediated T cell activation and proliferation. Besides, the results demonstrated that statins significantly down-regulated mRNA expression and suppress cytokine production of IL-2 and IFN-gamma in vitro. In conclusion, our data demonstrated that application of statins could induce immunosuppressive effect and prolong allografts survival through inhibiting activation and proliferation of T cell and reducing production of IL-2 and IFN-gamma.

Management of cardiovascular disease in renal transplant recipients

Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of graft loss and the leading cause of death in renal transplant recipients. Although there are robust data on the frequency of risk factors and their contributions to cardiovascular disease in this population, few trials have demonstrated the benefit of modifying these risk factors to reduce cardiovascular events. Nevertheless, it is widely accepted that the clinical acumen filtered through the best available studies in the general population be used to treat individual renal transplant recipients given their high cardiovascular mortality. Transplant task forces and the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative have created guidelines for this purpose. This review examines the data available for prevention and treatment of major risk factors contributing to cardiovascular disease in renal transplant recipients. The contribution of immunosuppressive agents to each risk factor and the evidence to support lifestyle modification as well as drug therapy are examined. Reducing cardiovascular risk factors requires an integrative approach that is best accomplished by a team of health care professionals. It creates a significant challenge but one that must be met if allograft survival is to improve.

Incidence of adverse events with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in liver transplant patients

Transplant patients are at increased risk of developing dyslipidemia, which contributes to coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events. The purpose of this study was to explore documented adverse effects of liver transplant recipients receiving lipid-lowering therapies.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 69 liver transplant patients was conducted to evaluate the incidence of adverse effects, especially rhabdomyolysis and liver function abnormalities, in liver transplant patients treated with a lipid lowering agent (LLA). Data were collected from the time of initiation of LLA to 12 months later, looking at the type, dose, and duration of LLA, concurrent cytochrome P450 inhibitors, immunosuppression used, and laboratory parameters.

RESULTS

For HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy, simvistatin was used in five (7.8%) patients, pravastatin in 40 (62.5%), fluvastatin in one (1.6%), atorvastatin in five (7.8%), and lovastatin in three (4.7%). Gemfibrozil, a fibric acid derivative, was employed as monotherapy in 10 (15.6%) of patients. There were five patients who received combination therapy with a fibric acid derivative, four (80%) with gemfibrozil + pravastatin, and one (20%) with gemfibrozil + simvastatin. Six patients studied had adverse effects, five (7.2%) with myalgia and one (1.4%) with myopathy. LLA monotherapy with either pravastatin or atorvastatin was used in these patients. The five patients with myalgia were on concurrent therapy with cyclosporin, and the patient with myopathy was on concurrent cyclosporin + diltiazem therapy, both of which are P450 inhibitors. One out of 23 patients on a non-immunosuppressant P450 inhibitor developed adverse effects. No significant elevation of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, or alkaline phosphatase was noted in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, there was a general tolerability with a low incidence of adverse events, no incidence of severe complications, and no alterations in liver function tests in the study population with the use of LLA.

Low HDL-C predicts the onset of transplant vasculopathy in pediatric cardiac recipients on pravastatin therapy

The levels and protein/lipid compositions of major lipoprotein particles of 19 pediatric cardiac transplant recipients (4-18 yr of age) were studied in this prospective, open clinical follow-up study before and at one yr of pravastatin therapy (10 mg/day). The recipients were grouped into those with (n = 6; group A) and those without (n = 13; group B) angiographically detectable vasculopathy. Twenty-one pediatric non-transplant controls were studied at baseline. At baseline, the group A recipients had 29% lower HDL-C concentrations (p = 0.031) and 29% higher apoB-100/apoA-I ratios (p = 0.034) than the group B recipients. At one yr of pravastatin, the respective figures were 29% (p = 0.013) and 33% (p = 0.005). Compared with the healthy pediatric controls, the transplant recipients had significantly higher serum TG before pravastatin [median (range): 1.3 mmol/L (0.6-3.2) vs. 0.7 mmol/L (0.3-2.4), p = 0.0002] and at one yr [1.3 mmol/L (0.5-3.5) vs. 0.7 mmol/L (0.3-2.4), p = 0.0004]. The baseline apoB-100/apoA1 ratios of the recipients were 33% higher (p = 0.005). In conclusion, low HDL-C and high apoB-100/apoA-I ratio were associated with angiographically detectable vasculopathy. Even though pravastatin effectively lowered the TC and LDL-C and improved compositional properties of LDL and HDL(2) particles, it failed to normalize the elevated TG and, in some patients, to prevent the progression of transplant vasculopathy.

Recommendations for the use of everolimus (Certican) in heart transplantation: results from the second German-Austrian Certican Consensus Conference

Everolimus (Certican; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) represents the latest generation of proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs). Everolimus is indicated for use as an immunosuppressive drug in renal and heart transplantation. This report reflects the recommendations of the second German-Austrian Certican Consensus Conference, held in January 2006, for the clinical use of everolimus.

Asymptomatic statin-induced rhabdomyolysis after long-term therapy with the hydrophilic drug pravastatin

CASE SUMMARY

A male patient aged 73 years, 165 cm in height, and weighing 78 kg presented to the emergency department with dsypnea. He had undergone heart transplantation 7 years earlier and been receiving daily pravastatin therapy for >3 years without complaining of any symptoms. A physical examination of the patient at admission was unremarkable, except for dyspnea. However, laboratory testing revealed that his serum creative kinase (CK) concentration was substantially above the reference range. Pravastatin was immediately discontinued, and the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit for treatment. CK values declined after 3 days, and they returned to within reference range after 3 weeks. The patient was diagnosed with acute rhabdomyolysis; a score of 6 on the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale indicated that pravastatin was the probable cause.

DISCUSSION

The hydrophilic statin pravastatin is frequently recommended for patients who have undergone heart transplantation due to its favorable tolerability profile. Unlike lipophilic statins, hydrophilic statins such as pravastatin are not metabolized in the liver via the cytochrome P450 system and have little potential for adverse events through interaction with drugs metabolized via this pathway. Based on a search of relevant literature, this report appears to be the first to describe a case of asymptomatic rhabdomyolysis occurring in a patient receiving long-term daily therapy with pravastatin after undergoing heart transplantation and who had no muscular symptoms or history of intense physical exertion. The occurrence of acute statin-induced rhabdomyolysis in this case suggests that even hydrophilic statins may have the potential to damage myocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

The hydrophilic statin pravastatin appears to have caused asymptomatic rhabdomyolysis, in the absence of physical exertion, in a patient who had undergone heart transplantation and had been receiving the drug for >3 years. Statin therapy should be initiated at the lowest effective dose, especially in patients who have undergone heart transplantation, and should be followed by close monitoring.

Rosuvastatin 5 and 10 mg/d: a pilot study of the effects in hypercholesterolemic adults unable to tolerate other statins and reach LDL cholesterol goals with nonstatin lipid-lowering therapies

BACKGROUND

Patients with high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) might not tolerate 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors ("statins") because of adverse effects (AEs) and might not respond well enough to nonstatin lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) to meet LDL-C goals.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the acceptability, effectiveness, and safety profile of rosuvastatin 5 and 10 mg/d in consecutively referred patients with primary high LDL-C who were unable to tolerate other statins because of myalgia and, subsequently in some cases, unable to reach LDL-C goals with nonstatin LLT.

METHODS

This prospective, open-label pilot study was conducted in consecutively referred male and female patients aged 38 to 80 years with primary high LDL-C (mean, 177 mg/dL) at The Cholesterol Center, Jewish Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio. Patients were instructed in the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) therapeutic lifestyle changes diet. Rosuvastatin 5 mg/d was administered to patients categorized by NCEP ATP III risk stratification as moderately high risk, and rosuvastatin 10 mg/d was administered to patients categorized as high or very high risk. End points included acceptability (assessed using patient-initiated discontinuation of rosuvastatin), effectiveness (absolute and percentage reductions in LDL-C and triglycerides), and safety profile (aspartate and alanine aminotransferases [AST and ALT, respectively] >3 times the laboratory upper limit of normal [xULN] or elevations in creatine kinase [CK]>10xULN).

RESULTS

A total of 61 patients were enrolled (41 women, 20 men; mean [SD] age, 60 [10] years; 5-mg/d dose, 25 patients; 10-mg/d dose, 36 patients). Myalgia, a predominant AE, had caused 50 patients to previously discontinue treatment with atorvastatin; 30, simvastatin; 19, pravastatin; 5, fluvastatin; 2, ezetimibe/simvastatin; and 1, lovastatin. Eighteen patients subsequently failed to reach LDL-C goals with nonstatin LLT(s) alone (colesevelam, 10 patients; ezetimibe, 8; niacin extended release, 2; and fenofibrate, 1). After a median treatment duration of 16 weeks, rosuvastatin 5 mg/d+diet was associated with a mean (SD) decrease from baseline in LDL-C of 75 (34) mg/dL (mean [SD] %Delta, -42% [18%]) (P<0.001 vs baseline). After a median treatment duration of 44 weeks, rosuvastatin 10 mg/d+diet was associated with a mean (SD) decrease from baseline in LDL-C of 79 (49) mg/dL (mean [SD] %Delta, -42% [24%]) (P<0.001 vs baseline). Of the 61 patients, 1 receiving the 10-mg/d dose discontinued rosuvastatin treatment because of unilateral muscular pain after 4 weeks; no AST or ALT levels were >3xULN, and no CK levels were >10xULN.

CONCLUSION

In these 61 hypercholesterolemic patients unable to tolerate other statins and, subsequently in some cases, unable to meet LDL-C goals while receiving nonstatin LIT monotherapy, these preliminary observations suggest that rosuvastatin at doses of 5 and 10 mg/d+diet was well tolerated, effective, and had a good safety profile.

Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Statins for Heart Transplant Recipients in Routine Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Whereas the efficacy of statins after heart transplantation (HT) in controlled study settings has been clearly demonstrated, more extensive data are required on the safety and effectiveness of long-term treatment in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

We analyzed the risks and benefits in clinical practice of treatment with statins in all patients who survived HT for at least a month from December 1985 through 2001.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 4.8+/-3.8 years, 186 patients were treated with statins (for a median duration [25th to 75th percentile] of 29 [12 to 54] months), while 48 received dietary therapy alone. Patients treated with statins (pravastatin, 48%; atorvastatin, 37%; simvastatin, 14%) presented linearized rates of rhabdomyolisis, myositis, and significant transaminase elevation of 0.37%, 0.74%, and 0.37% per year of treatment, respectively (no fatal event occurred). Low-density lipoprotein decreased after statins by 19% (P<.001). At multivariate analysis, treatment with statins was independently associated with reduced risk of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and overall mortality (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data provide necessary confirmation of the safety and effectiveness in routine clinical practice of appropriately monitored long-term administration of statins (particularly atorvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin) in the chronic post-HT phase. Strict follow-up is needed for HT recipients receiving high doses of statins with/without other medications potentially exacerbating the risk of adverse effects.

Localized Rhabdomyolysis After Exertion in a Cardiac Transplant Recipient on Statin Therapy

Rhabdomyolysis is a recognized but uncommon side effect of statin therapy. Pravastatin is a commonly used statin after cardiac transplantation, with favorable outcome and acceptable side-effect profile. We report a case of localized rhabdomyolysis attributed to physical exertion in a cardiac transplant recipient taking pravastatin.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: the Achilles' heel of long-term survival after cardiac transplantation

Over the past 40 years, cardiac transplantation has evolved as the single best long-term option for eligible candidates with end-stage heart failure. Approximately 2000 transplants are performed annually in the United States, and with the institution of calcineurin-based immunotherapy, surveillance biopsies, and programmatic-based patient care, life expectancy at 1 and 12 years is 85% and 50%, respectively. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is the number one cause of death after the first year of transplantation. The incidence of CAV remains as high as 50% at 5 years, with life expectancy significantly abbreviated once it is recognized. Although current immunotherapy has reduced the likelihood of cellular rejection, it has not impacted CAV substantially. Better treatment of established risk factors and the advent of newer antiproliferative immunotherapy may hold promise in treating CAV. However, future therapies must address the multitude of mechanisms underlying CAV. This manuscript reviews the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, screening, and diagnostic strategies for cardiac allograft vasculopathy while emphasizing current treatment paradigms designed to stave off or retard the progression of CAV.

Ten-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Trial of Pravastatin in Heart Transplant Patients

BACKGROUND

Outcomes from this trial's first year data demonstrated significant benefit in heart transplant patients treated with pravastatin in cholesterol levels, survival, rejection with hemodynamic compromise, the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and decreased natural killer cell cytotoxicity. Other heart transplant studies have shown similar benefit. We now report the 10-year follow-up of this study.

METHODS

Ninety-seven heart transplant recipients were randomized to pravastatin (n = 47) or no pravastatin (n = 50) within 2 weeks after surgery both in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Ten-year outcomes include survival, cholesterol levels, and development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy documented by coronary angiography.

RESULTS

Forty-two percent of the control patients crossed over to pravastatin treatment during the second year of the study, and 81% of the control patients were eventually placed on statin therapy by the 10-year follow-up. The control group had subsequent low and comparable cholesterol levels in Years 2 to 10 of the study compared with the patients originally randomized to pravastatin. Intent-to-treat analysis demonstrated that the pravastatin group compared with control had increased 10-year survival (68% vs 48%, p = 0.026). The 10-year freedom from angiographic cardiac allograft vasculopathy and/or death in the pravastatin group was significantly greater compared with the control group (43% vs 20%, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

The 10-year follow-up of this study suggests that the use of pravastatin in heart transplant patients maintains survival benefit and appears to reduce the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Safety of Statins When Response is Carefully Monitored: A Study of 336 Heart Recipients

BACKGROUND

Statins are used as first-line drugs against hypercholesterolemia after heart transplantation. Randomized clinical trials have shown that they reduce cholesterol levels, and the incidence of rejection and coronary vasculopathy. Adverse effects have been related to the use of certain statins, high statin dosages, comorbidities, and coadministration with cyclosporine. However, estimation of the risk of adverse effects for a given patient is difficult. The aims of this study were to determine the incidence of various kinds of adverse effect of statins; to evaluate certain potential risk factors; and to assess the efficacy of early response to signs of adverse effects.

METHODS

Between April 1991 and December 2003, we retrospectively evaluated 336 heart transplant patients (including 55 women) with regard to the occurrence of possible adverse effects of statins (rhabdomyolysis, myalgia, hepatotoxicity, high CK without muscle symptoms, and others). Resolution on reduction of dosage or discontinuance and/or change of statin were deemed to constitute confirmation of cause. Relations were sought between adverse effects and age, sex, immunosuppressive therapy, kidney failure, body mass index (BMI), arterial hypertension, and diabetes mellitus.

RESULTS

Possible adverse events of statins were suffered by 60 patients, all of them men. The causal role of statins was confirmed in 41 (12.2% of all 336): hepatotoxicity was suffered by 13, high CK without muscle ache or weakness by 18, rhabdomyolysis by 5, myalgia by 3, and other effects by 2. The incidence of confirmed statin-related complications was higher among patients with BMI >29 kg/m(2) than among those with lower BMI (P = .055). None of the patients with confirmed statin-related complications needed dialysis, none died, and permanent suspension of statin treatment was only necessary in 13 cases (3.9% of the 336).

CONCLUSIONS

Some 10% to 20% of HT patients appear to suffer adverse side effects of initial statin therapy. However, early detection of such effects through diligent clinical and analytical monitoring allows the therapy to be modified in time to minimize the appearance of severe complications. In only a minority of cases permanent suspension of statin therapy is necessary.

Survival, Graft Atherosclerosis, and Rejection Incidence in Heart Transplant Recipients Treated With Statins: 5-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined the long-term benefits of statin treatment in heart transplant recipients.

METHODS

In this observational study, we retrospectively reviewed data pertaining to 5-year follow-up of patients who underwent heart transplantation between 1993 and 1996 and who survived the first 30 days after transplantation. Patients were assigned to groups according to whether or not they received pravastatin after transplantation, and then compared with regard to transplant rejection, transplant coronary artery disease, and survival.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients received pravastatin after transplantation, whereas 37 did not receive any statins and served as controls. Pravastatin did not affect the overall incidence of rejections or number of rejection episodes. Hemodynamically significant rejection episodes occurred in 5 patients (5%) in the pravastatin group and 4 patients (11%) in the control group. Thus, pravastatin treatment apparently reduced the incidence of hemodynamically significant rejection episodes by 50% (p = 0.04). Transplant coronary artery disease (CAD) occurred in 10 patients (11%) in the pravastatin group and 9 patients (24%) in the control group. Treatment with pravastatin significantly reduced the incidence of transplant CAD (p = 0.05). Three- and 5-year survival rates in the pravastatin group were significantly better than in the control group (87% vs 68% and 82% vs 58%, respectively; p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Pravastatin therapy offers long-term benefits to heart transplant recipients. It improves 5-year survival, lowers the risk of transplant CAD, and lowers the incidence of hemodynamically significant rejection episodes.

Safety and Efficacy of Rosuvastatin Therapy for the Prevention of Hyperlipidemia in Adult Cardiac Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Hyperlipidemia after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) is associated with immunosuppression. Many OHT patients have increased lipid levels above published guidelines despite treatment with high doses of statins. Treatment with rosuvastatin (ROS) in OHT patients has not yet been evaluated. Therefore, we assessed its efficacy and safety in an OHT population.

METHODS

Twenty-one OHT recipients, median age 66 years, whose lipid levels were sub-optimal on the highest tolerated doses of statins, received ROS in addition to standard immunosuppression. Total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), liver transaminases (AST) and creatinine kinase (CK) were measured before and during treatment with ROS.

RESULTS

After 6 weeks on an average ROS dose of 10 mg/day, a TC:HDL-C ratio of <4 was reached in 76% of patients, and 70% of patients reached an LDL-C level of <2.5 mmol/liter (100 mg/dl). TC decreased to <5.2 mmol/liter (200 mg/dl) in 80% of patients and TG decreased to <2 mmol/liter (175 mg/dl) in 61% of patients. Except for the HDL-C increase, all changes were statistically significant. The decrease in the median TC:HDL-C ratio between baseline and 6 weeks was also statistically significant (p = 0.001). There were no significant changes in CK or AST levels, and no clinical evidence of myositis. One patient developed myalgia and 2 were withdrawn from the study because of mild elevation of CK (<3-fold upper limit of normal [ULN]).

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of tertiary referral centers, ROS appears to be safe and effective in lowering LDL-C in OHT recipients in whom treatment with other statins failed to achieve target LDL-C. No evidence of liver or muscle dysfunction was noted. Long-term studies are needed to ascertain the effect of ROS therapy on incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in this population.

The effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on chronic allograft rejection

Hydroxy-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors have pleiotropic actions that affect many systems other than lowering blood cholesterol concentrations. Hypercholesterolaemia is an adverse effect of immunosuppressive drug therapy and hence it is a common finding after organ transplantation. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors lower cholesterol concentrations in transplant recipients but they also offer additional benefits. Since they impair the production of mevalonate, they reduce the concentrations of downstream products including farnesyl and geranyl phosphate. These isoprenoid moieties are required for protein prenylation and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors impair this function in some cells. This action affects the immune system, especially in patients taking cyclosporin, and has been proposed as the mechanism whereby these drugs increase the half-life of transplanted organs. Other mechanisms have also been proposed including an increase in the free fraction of cyclosporin and a reduction in the time that low density lipoprotein (LDL) spends in blood. The latter effect reduces the extent of oxidation of LDL and hence reduces the damage caused by oxidised LDL. Chronic rejection is poorly understood but appears to involve both immune and non-immune processes. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors affect both processes. At present, the evidence of benefit from statin prescription is confined to heart and kidney transplant recipients but it is likely that recipients of other organ transplants would also benefit. Drug interactions between cyclosporin and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are a limiting factor to their use. Pravastatin appears to be the best HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor for organ transplant recipients because of its lesser potential to interact with cyclosporin and hence cause myositis, which may thus allow higher doses to be used. Other, non-immunosuppressive drugs (including diltiazem and ketoconazole) have been shown to reduce transplant organ damage by unknown mechanisms and are widely prescribed in some transplant centres. More specific inhibitors of protein prenylation may afford useful immunosuppression, thereby prolonging transplant organ half-lives and also reducing the risk of cancer.

Metaanalysis of statins and survival in de novo cardiac transplantation

BACKGROUND

The use of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) after cardiac transplantation has been suggested to decrease the incidence of severe rejection and improve survival. Individual investigations that have led to this suggestion are randomized (but not placebo-controlled) studies, including small patient numbers that have (and thus underpowered) and enrolling heterogeneous subjects (including retransplant recipients). The purpose of this pooled analysis was to quantify the benefit of statins on survival in de novo cardiac transplant recipients.

METHODS

Medline (1966 to 2003) was queried using the keywords statin, HMG CoA reductase inhibitors, cardiac transplantation, transplant, cholesterol, atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin. In addition, we searched the cited literature and previously published systematic reviews. Of 36 articles retrieved, 3 randomized controlled studies met our population inclusion criteria; namely age >18 years, de novo heart transplant recipients, statin therapy within 3 months, and > or = 1-year follow-up. Pooled data were metaanalyzed by Mantel-Haenszel tests using a random effects model that included tests for heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The three pooled studies included 246 patients (statin, n = 129; no statin, n = 117) and 27 events (11%). The pooled analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality with statin use (RR 0.31; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.7; P = .006) without significant heterogeneity (P = .7) among the studies. Two of the three studies reported allograft rejection with hemodynamic compromise. The pooled analysis demonstrated a significant benefit on this endpoint (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.63; P = .004).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates that statin therapy decreases rejection episodes with hemodynamic consequences and improves 1-year heart transplant survival.