Magnetoencephalographic yield of interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy. Comparison with scalp EEG recordings

Comparison of beamformer and ICA for dynamic connectivity analysis: A simultaneous MEG-SEEG study

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a powerful tool for estimating brain connectivity with both good spatial and temporal resolution. It is particularly helpful in epilepsy to characterize non-invasively the epileptic networks. However, using MEG to map brain networks requires solving a difficult inverse problem that introduces uncertainty in the activity localization and connectivity measures. Our goal here was to compare independent component analysis (ICA) followed by dipole source localization and the linearly constrained minimum-variance beamformer (LCMV-BF) for characterizing regions with interictal epileptic activity and their dynamic connectivity. After a simulation study, we compared ICA and LCMV-BF results with intracerebral EEG (stereotaxic EEG, SEEG) recorded simultaneously in 8 epileptic patients, which provide a unique 'ground truth' to which non-invasive results can be confronted. We compared the signal time courses extracted applying ICA and LCMV-BF on MEG data to that of SEEG, both for the actual signals and the dynamic connectivity computed using cross-correlation (evolution of links in time). With our simulations, we illustrated the different effect of the temporal and spatial correlation among sources on the two methods. While ICA was more affected by the temporal correlation but robust against spatial configurations, LCMV-BF showed opposite behavior. Moreover, ICA seems more suited to retrieve the simulated networks. In case of real patient data, good MEG/SEEG correlation and good localization were obtained in 6 out of 8 patients. In 4 of them ICA had the best performance (higher correlation, lower localization distance). In terms of dynamic connectivity, the evolution in time of the cross-correlation links could be retrieved in 5 patients out of 6, however, with more variable results in terms of correlation and distance. In two patients LCMV-BF had better results than ICA. In one patient the two methods showed equally good outcomes, and in the remaining two patients ICA performed best. In conclusion, our results obtained by exploiting simultaneous MEG/SEEG recordings suggest that ICA and LCMV-BF have complementary qualities for retrieving the dynamics of interictal sources and their network interactions.

Magnetoencephalography to confirm epileptiform discharges mimicking small sharp spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether magnetoencephalography (MEG) can identify epileptiform discharges mimicking small sharp spikes (SSSs) on scalp electroencephalography (EEG) in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed simultaneous scalp EEG and MEG recordings of 83 consecutive patients with TLE and 49 with extra-TLE (ETLE).

RESULTS

SSSs in scalp EEG were detected in 15 (18.1%) of 83 TLE patients compared to only two (4.1%) of 49 ETLE patients (p = 0.029). Five of the 15 TLE patients had MEG spikes with concurrent SSSs in EEG, but neither of the 2 ETLE patients. Three of these 5 TLE patients had additional interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) in EEG and MEG. Equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) of MEG spikes with concurrent SSSs and IEDs showed no difference in temporal lobe localization and horizontal orientation, whereas ECD moments were smaller in MEG spikes with concurrent SSSs than those with IEDs.

CONCLUSIONS

SSSs were more common in TLE than in ETLE. At least some morphologically diagnosed SSSs are true but low-amplitude epileptiform discharges in TLE which can be identified with simultaneous MEG.

SIGNIFICANCE

Simultaneous MEG is useful to identify epileptiform discharges mimicking SSSs in patients with TLE.

Magnetoencephalography: physics, techniques, and applications in the basic and clinical neurosciences

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a technique used to measure the magnetic fields generated from neuronal activity in the brain. MEG has a high temporal resolution on the order of milliseconds and provides a more direct measure of brain activity when compared with hemodynamic-based neuroimaging methods such as magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. The current review focuses on basic features of MEG such as the instrumentation and the physics that are integral to the signals that can be measured, and the principles of source localization techniques, particularly the physics of beamforming and the techniques that are used to localize the signal of interest. In addition, we review several metrics that can be used to assess functional coupling in MEG and describe the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Lastly, we discuss the current and future applications of MEG.

Redefining the role of Magnetoencephalography in refractory epilepsy

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) possesses a number of features, including excellent spatiotemporal resolution, that lend itself to the functional imaging of epileptic activity. However its current use is restricted to specific scenarios, namely in the diagnosis refractory focal epilepsies where electroencephalography (EEG) has been inconclusive. This review highlights the recent progress of MEG within epilepsy, including advances in the technique itself such as simultaneous EEG/MEG and intracranial EEG/MEG recording and room temperature MEG recording using optically pumped magnetometers, as well as improved post processing of the data during interictal and ictal activity for accurate source localisation of the epileptogenic focus. These advances should broaden the scope of MEG as an important part of epilepsy diagnostics in the future.

Interictal and ictal source localization for epilepsy surgery using high-density EEG with MEG: a prospective long-term study

Drug-resistant focal epilepsy is a major clinical problem and surgery is under-used. Better non-invasive techniques for epileptogenic zone localization are needed when MRI shows no lesion or an extensive lesion. The problem is interictal and ictal localization before propagation from the epileptogenic zone. High-density EEG (HDEEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) offer millisecond-order temporal resolution to address this but co-acquisition is challenging, ictal MEG studies are rare, long-term prospective studies are lacking, and fundamental questions remain. Should HDEEG-MEG discharges be assessed independently [electroencephalographic source localization (ESL), magnetoencephalographic source localization (MSL)] or combined (EMSL) for source localization? Which phase of the discharge best characterizes the epileptogenic zone (defined by intracranial EEG and surgical resection relative to outcome)? Does this differ for interictal and ictal discharges? Does MEG detect mesial temporal lobe discharges? Thirteen patients (10 non-lesional, three extensive-lesional) underwent synchronized HDEEG-MEG (72–94 channel EEG, 306-sensor MEG). Source localization (standardized low-resolution tomographic analysis with MRI patient-individualized boundary-element method) was applied to averaged interictal epileptiform discharges (IED) and ictal discharges at three phases: ‘early-phase’ (first latency 90% explained variance), ‘mid-phase’ (first of 50% rising-phase, 50% mean global field power), ‘late-phase’ (negative peak). ‘Earliest-solution’ was the first of the three early-phase solutions (ESL, MSL, EMSL). Prospective follow-up was 3–21 (median 12) months before surgery, 14–39 (median 21) months after surgery. IEDs (n = 1474) were recorded, seen in: HDEEG only, 626 (42%); MEG only, 232 (16%); and both 616 (42%). Thirty-three seizures were captured, seen in: HDEEG only, seven (21%); MEG only, one (3%); and both 25 (76%). Intracranial EEG was done in nine patients. Engel scores were I (9/13, 69%), II (2/13,15%), and III (2/13). MEG detected baso-mesial temporal lobe epileptogenic zone sources. Epileptogenic zone OR [odds ratio(s)] were significantly higher for earliest-solution versus early-phase IED-surgical resection and earliest-solution versus all mid-phase and late-phase solutions. ESL outperformed EMSL for ictal-surgical resection [OR 3.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09–11.55, P = 0.036]. MSL outperformed EMSL for IED-intracranial EEG (OR 4.67, 95% CI 1.19–18.34, P = 0.027). ESL outperformed MSL for ictal-surgical resection (OR 3.73, 95% CI 1.16–12.03, P = 0.028) but was outperformed by MSL for IED-intracranial EEG (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05–0.73, P = 0.017). Thus, (i) HDEEG and MEG source solutions more accurately localize the epileptogenic zone at the earliest resolvable phase of interictal and ictal discharges, not mid-phase (as is common practice) or late peak-phase (when signal-to-noise ratios are maximal); (ii) from empirical observation of the differential timing of HDEEG and MEG discharges and based on the superiority of ESL plus MSL over either modality alone and over EMSL, concurrent HDEEG-MEG signals should be assessed independently, not combined; (iii) baso-mesial temporal lobe sources are detectable by MEG; and (iv) MEG is not ‘more accurate’ than HDEEG—emphasis is best placed on the earliest signal (whether HDEEG or MEG) amenable to source localization. Our findings challenge current practice and our reliance on invasive monitoring in these patients.

Evidence for the Role of Magnetic Source Imaging in the Presurgical Evaluation of Refractory Epilepsy Patients

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) in the field of epilepsy has multiple advantages; just like electroencephalography (EEG), MEG is able to measure the epilepsy specific information (i.e., the brain activity reflecting seizures and/or interictal epileptiform discharges) directly, non-invasively and with a very high temporal resolution (millisecond-range). In addition MEG has a unique sensitivity for tangential sources, resulting in a full picture of the brain activity when combined with EEG. It accurately allows to perform source imaging of focal epileptic activity and functional cortex and shows a specific high sensitivity for a source in the neocortex. In this paper the current evidence and practice for using magnetic source imaging of focal interictal and ictal epileptic activity during the presurgical evaluation of drug resistant patients is being reviewed.

Assessing the localization accuracy and clinical utility of electric and magnetic source imaging in children with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy and clinical utility of conventional 21-channel EEG (conv-EEG), 72-channel high-density EEG (HD-EEG) and 306-channel MEG in localizing interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs).

METHODS

Twenty-four children who underwent epilepsy surgery were studied. IEDs on conv-EEG, HD-EEG, MEG and intracranial EEG (iEEG) were localized using equivalent current dipoles and dynamical statistical parametric mapping (dSPM). We compared the localization error (E_Loc) with respect to the ground-truth Irritative Zone (IZ), defined by iEEG sources, between non-invasive modalities and the distance from resection (D_res) between good- (Engel 1) and poor-outcomes. For each patient, we estimated the resection percentage of IED sources and tested whether it predicted outcome.

RESULTS

MEG presented lower E_Loc than HD-EEG and conv-EEG. For all modalities, D_res was shorter in good-outcome than poor-outcome patients, but only the resection percentage of the ground-truth IZ and MEG-IZ predicted surgical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

MEG localizes the IZ more accurately than conv-EEG and HD-EEG. MSI may help the presurgical evaluation in terms of patient's outcome prediction. The promising clinical value of ESI for both conv-EEG and HD-EEG prompts the use of higher-density EEG-systems to possibly achieve MEG performance.

SIGNIFICANCE

Localizing the IZ non-invasively with MSI/ESI facilitates presurgical evaluation and surgical prognosis assessment.

Relative Yield of MEG and EEG Spikes in Simultaneous Recordings

PURPOSE

Most clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG) centers record both MEG and EEG, but model only MEG sources. This may be related to the belief that MEG spikes are more prevalent, MEG is more sensitive, or to proprietary software limitations. Biophysics would contend, however, that EEG, being sensitive to radial and tangential source orientations, would provide complementary data for analysis.

METHODS

We recorded 306 channels of MEG and 25 channels of EEG simultaneously in 297 consecutive patients over 3 years. We inspected the MEG and EEG recordings separately, identified spikes in both, determined whether their voltage and/or magnetometer magnetic fields were dipolar and thus model-worthy, and segregated them into types based on similar and distinct field topography. We placed for each patient their spike types into categories, including those with both a recognizable MEG and EEG signal and those with only an MEG and only an EEG signal.

RESULTS

Eighty-three percent of patients had spikes recorded, and these patients had an average of 2.7 spike types each. Fifty-six percent of spike types were present in both MEG and EEG. However, 36% of spike types were only evident in EEG, whereas 8% were noted in MEG alone. In 49% of patients with spikes, MEG review missed at least one spike type, whereas in 17% of patients, EEG review missed at least one spike type.

CONCLUSIONS

To obtain an optimal yield of diagnostic information, EEG should also be subjected to source analysis in any clinical MEG study. EEG and MEG data are indeed complementary.

IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG)

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) records weak magnetic fields outside the human head and thereby provides millisecond-accurate information about neuronal currents supporting human brain function. MEG and electroencephalography (EEG) are closely related complementary methods and should be interpreted together whenever possible. This manuscript covers the basic physical and physiological principles of MEG and discusses the main aspects of state-of-the-art MEG data analysis. We provide guidelines for best practices of patient preparation, stimulus presentation, MEG data collection and analysis, as well as for MEG interpretation in routine clinical examinations. In 2017, about 200 whole-scalp MEG devices were in operation worldwide, many of them located in clinical environments. Yet, the established clinical indications for MEG examinations remain few, mainly restricted to the diagnostics of epilepsy and to preoperative functional evaluation of neurosurgical patients. We are confident that the extensive ongoing basic MEG research indicates potential for the evaluation of neurological and psychiatric syndromes, developmental disorders, and the integrity of cortical brain networks after stroke. Basic and clinical research is, thus, paving way for new clinical applications to be identified by an increasing number of practitioners of MEG.

Reproducibility of EEG-MEG fusion source analysis of interictal spikes: Relevance in presurgical evaluation of epilepsy

Fusion of electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) data using maximum entropy on the mean method (MEM-fusion) takes advantage of the complementarities between EEG and MEG to improve localization accuracy. Simulation studies demonstrated MEM-fusion to be robust especially in noisy conditions such as single spike source localizations (SSSL). Our objective was to assess the reliability of SSSL using MEM-fusion on clinical data. We proposed to cluster SSSL results to find the most reliable and consistent source map from the reconstructed sources, the so-called consensus map. Thirty-four types of interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs) were analyzed from 26 patients with well-defined epileptogenic focus. SSSLs were performed on EEG, MEG, and fusion data and consensus maps were estimated using hierarchical clustering. Qualitative (spike-to-spike reproducibility rate, SSR) and quantitative (localization error and spatial dispersion) assessments were performed using the epileptogenic focus as clinical reference. Fusion SSSL provided significantly better results than EEG or MEG alone. Fusion found at least one cluster concordant with the clinical reference in all cases. This concordant cluster was always the one involving the highest number of spikes. Fusion yielded highest reproducibility (SSR EEG = 55%, MEG = 71%, fusion = 90%) and lowest localization error. Also, using only few channels from either modality (21EEG + 272MEG or 54EEG + 25MEG) was sufficient to reach accurate fusion. MEM-fusion with consensus map approach provides an objective way of finding the most reliable and concordant generators of IEDs. We, therefore, suggest the pertinence of SSSL using MEM-fusion as a valuable clinical tool for presurgical evaluation of epilepsy.

Overview of MEG

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a method to study electrical activity in the human brain by recording the neuromagnetic field outside the head. MEG, like electroencephalography (EEG), provides an excellent, millisecond-scale time resolution, and allows the estimation of the spatial distribution of the underlying activity, in favorable cases with a localization accuracy of a few millimeters. To detect the weak neuromagnetic signals, superconducting sensors, magnetically shielded rooms, and advanced signal processing techniques are used. The analysis and interpretation of MEG data typically involves comparisons between subject groups and experimental conditions using various spatial, temporal, and spectral measures of cortical activity and connectivity. The application of MEG to cognitive neuroscience studies is illustrated with studies of spoken language processing in subjects with normal and impaired reading ability. The mapping of spatiotemporal patterns of activity within networks of cortical areas can provide useful information about the functional architecture of the brain related to sensory and cognitive processing, including language, memory, attention, and perception.

Accuracy of MEG in localizing irritative zone and seizure onset zone: Quantitative comparison between MEG and intracranial EEG

BACKGROUND

We conducted the study to examine accuracy of the magnetoencephalography (MEG) spike source localization in presurgical evaluation of patients with medically refractory focal epilepsy.

METHODS

Ten consecutive patients with refractory focal epilepsy who were candidates for two-stage surgery with long-term intracranial electroencephalography (ICEEG) monitoring were enrolled. Interictal MEG recordings with simultaneous scalp EEG were obtained within 7days before the ICEEG electrode implantation. The location of each MEG spike source was quantitatively compared with ICEEG spike foci (focal area of interictal spikes) and ICEEG ictal foci (earliest cortical origin of seizures). Gyral-width concordance and sublobar concordance were also determined for all MEG spike sources. Gyral-width concordance was defined by distance of 15mm or less between MEG spike sources and ICEEG spike foci or ICEEG ictal foci.

RESULTS

Visual analyses of the MEG traces of all 10 patients revealed 292 spikes (29.2±24.0 per patient). Spike yield of the MEG was similar to the simultaneously recorded scalp EEG. MEG spike sources were closely located with ICEEG spike foci (distance: 9.3±10.8mm). Clustered MEG spike sources were even closer to ICEEG spike foci (distance: 7.3±6.4mm). MEG spike sources, even clustered ones, were less concordant with ICEEG ictal foci and had significant longer distance from ICEEG ictal foci (distance: 21.5±15.6mm for all sources, 19.7±13.7mm for clustered sources). Gyral-width concordance rate and sublobar concordance rate were also higher with ICEEG interictal spike foci than with ICEEG ictal foci. On the other hand, 53.4% of interictal spike foci from ICEEG were not detected by interictal MEG recordings.

CONCLUSIONS

MEG spike sources, especially clustered ones, from interictal recording could localize the irritative zone of ICEEG with a high accuracy. However, MEG spike sources have relatively poor correlation with seizure onset zone and lower sensitivity in identifying all irritative zones of ICEEG. This limitation should be considered in the interpretation of MEG results.

Neuroimaging for patient selection for medial temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: Part 1 Structural neuroimaging

The objective of part one of this review is to present the structural neuroimaging techniques that are currently used to evaluate patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), and to discuss their potential to define patient eligibility for medial temporal lobe surgery. A PubMed query, using Medline and Embase, and subsequent review, was performed for all English language studies published after 1990, reporting neuroimaging methods for the evaluation of patients with TLE. The extracted data included demographic variables, population and study design, imaging methods, gold standard methods, imaging findings, surgical outcomes and conclusions. Overall, 56 papers were reviewed, including a total of 1517 patients. This review highlights the following structural neuroimaging techniques: MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging, tractography, electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. The developments in neuroimaging during the last decades have led to remarkable improvements in surgical precision, postsurgical outcome, prognosis, and the rate of seizure control in patients with TLE. The use of multiple imaging methods provides improved outcomes, and further improvements will be possible with future studies of larger patient cohorts.

Increased Intrinsic Connectivity of the Default Mode Network in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Evidence from Resting-State MEG Recordings

The electrophysiological signature of resting state oscillatory functional connectivity within the default mode network (DMN) during spike-free periods in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) remains unclear. Using magnetoencephalographic (MEG) recordings, this study investigated how the connectivity within the DMN was altered in TLE, and we examined the effect of lateralized TLE on functional connectivity. Sixteen medically intractable TLE patients and 22 controls participated in this study. Whole-scalp 306-channel MEG epochs without interictal spikes generated from both MEG and EEG data were analyzed using a minimum norm estimate (MNE) and source-based imaginary coherence analysis. With this processing, we obtained the cortical activation and functional connectivity within the DMN. The functional connectivity was increased between DMN and the right medial temporal (MT) region at the delta band and between DMN and the bilateral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) regions at the theta band. The functional change was associated with the lateralization of TLE. The right TLE showed enhanced DMN connectivity with the right MT while the left TLE demonstrated increased DMN connectivity with the bilateral MT. There was no lateralization effect of TLE upon the DMN connectivity with ACC. These findings suggest that the resting-state functional connectivity within the DMN is reinforced in temporal lobe epilepsy during spike-free periods. Future studies are needed to examine if the altered functional connectivity can be used as a biomarker for treatment responses, cognitive dysfunction and prognosis in patients with TLE.

Magnetoencephalography in presurgical epilepsy diagnosis

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a functional modality to register magnetic brain activity with high spatiotemporal resolution. Since distortion of magnetic fields by the skin, skull and cerebrospinal fluids is negligible, the technique offers an almost undistorted view on brain activity. While MEG systems are still expensive and complex, the technique's characteristics offer promising possibilities for the investigation of epilepsy patients, for example, for focus localization and presurgical functional mapping. This review gives an overview of the method and discusses advantages and limitations in the clinical context of presurgical epilepsy diagnosis.

Panic versus epilepsy: a challenging differential diagnosis

The differential diagnosis of panic attacks (PAs) from temporal lobe epilepsy is important and challenging. Despite advances in understanding the neural basis of psychiatric disorders, current practice strongly emphasizes dichotomous thinking of either "functional" PAs of psychiatric etiology or a seizure disorder. We present a case with PA features strongly suggestive of a seizure disorder. An extensive workup failed to resolve the dichotomy between functional and neurological. The possibility is raised that there may be degrees of abnormal hyperexcitability, leading to the emergence of symptoms, but not enough to generate large potentials that can be detected at the scalp.

The role of magnetoencephalography in children undergoing hemispherectomy

OBJECT

Hemispherectomy is an established neurosurgical procedure for medication-resistant epilepsy in children. Despite the effectiveness of this technique, there are patients who do not achieve an optimum outcome after surgery; possible causes of suboptimal results include the presence of bilateral independent epileptogenic foci. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is an emerging tool that has been found to be useful in the management of lesional and nonlesional epilepsy. The authors analyzed the relative contribution of MEG in patient selection for hemispherectomy.

METHODS

The medical records of children undergoing hemispherectomy at the Hospital for Sick Children were reviewed. Those patients who underwent MEG as part of the presurgical evaluation were selected.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were included in the study. Nine patients were boys. The mean age at the time of surgery was 66 months (range 10-149 months). Seizure etiology was Rasmussen encephalitis in 6 patients, hemimegalencephaly in 2 patients, and cortical dysplasia in 4 patients. In 8 patients, video-EEG and MEG results were consistent to localize the primary epileptogenic hemisphere. In 2 patients, video-EEG lateralized the ictal onset, but MEG showed bilateral spikes. Two patients had bilateral video-EEG and MEG spikes. Engel Class I, II, and IV outcomes were seen in 10, 2, and 1 patients, respectively. In 2 of the patients who had an outcome other than Engel Class I, the MEG clusters were concentrated in the disconnected hemisphere. The third patient had bilateral clusters and potentially independent epileptogenic foci from bilateral cortical dysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of unilateral MEG spike waves correlated with good outcomes following hemispherectomy. In some cases, MEG provides information that differs from that obtained from video-EEG and conventional MR imaging studies. Further studies with a greater number of patients are needed to assess the role of MEG in the preoperative assessment of candidates for hemispherectomy.

Clinical applications of magnetoencephalography in epilepsy

Magnetoencehalography (MEG) is being used with increased frequency in the pre-surgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy. One of the major advantages of this technique over the EEG is the lack of distortion of MEG signals by the skull and intervening soft tissue. In addition, the MEG preferentially records activity from tangential sources thus recording activity predominantly from sulci, which is not contaminated by activity from apical gyral (radial) sources. While the MEG is probably more sensitive than the EEG in detecting interictal spikes, especially in the some locations such as the superficial frontal cortex and the lateral temporal neocortex, both techniques are usually complementary to each other. The diagnostic accuracy of MEG source localization is usually better as compared to scalp EEG localization. Functional localization of eloquent cortex is another major application of the MEG. The combination of high spatial and temporal resolution of this technique makes it an extremely helpful tool for accurate localization of visual, somatosensory and auditory cortices as well as complex cognitive functions like language. Potential future applications include lateralization of memory function.

Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to source orientation

An important difference between magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) is that MEG is insensitive to radially oriented sources. We quantified computationally the dependency of MEG and EEG on the source orientation using a forward model with realistic tissue boundaries. Similar to the simpler case of a spherical head model, in which MEG cannot see radial sources at all, for most cortical locations there was a source orientation to which MEG was insensitive. The median value for the ratio of the signal magnitude for the source orientation of the lowest and the highest sensitivity was 0.06 for MEG and 0.63 for EEG. The difference in the sensitivity to the source orientation is expected to contribute to systematic differences in the signal-to-noise ratio between MEG and EEG.

Can magnetoencephalography aid epilepsy surgery?

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) has a long history of development for the application of epilepsy. Technical and clinical validation of spike source estimation has been demonstrated in most partial epilepsies. The question that needs to be clarified concerns clinical value: Do identification and localization of epileptiform discharges play an important role in the determination of epilepsy localization for surgery? EEG is the mainstay in the investigation of seizure disorders and will remain so because it alone possesses the attribute of long-term recordings that can capture seizures. In contrast, MEG has the unique capability of nearly instantaneous high-resolution recording, with detection sensitivity and spike localization precision beyond that of EEG. Do these distinctions matter from a clinical standpoint?

Use of routine MEG in the primary diagnostic process of epilepsy

At present, in epilepsy, magnetoencephalography (MEG) is mostly used for presurgical evaluations. It has proven to be robust for detecting and localizing interictal epileptiform discharges. Whether this is also true for first-line investigation in the diagnosis of epilepsy has not been investigated yet. We present our data on the usefulness of MEG in the earliest phase of diagnosing epilepsy. We examined 51 patients with suspicion of neocortical epilepsy and an inconclusive routine EEG. A method to integrate MEG in daily routine was developed. Results of visually assessed MEG recordings were compared, retrospectively, with clinical data and with the results of EEG after sleep deprivation. After a finding of inconclusive, routine MEG generated a gain in diagnostic value of 63% when compared with "final" clinical diagnosis. This is comparable with the added value of EEG after sleep deprivation recorded previously in the same patients. However, MEG is less of a burden for patient and hospital and has no association with risk of increase in seizure frequency. The routine MEG with visual assessment only is a reliable diagnostic tool in the routine diagnosis of epilepsy and may replace or precede EEG after sleep deprivation in daily clinical practice. Furthermore, MEG together with MRI enables magnetic source imaging and, thus, may provide additional information on the cortical localization of the epilepsy of a patient.

Cancellation of EEG and MEG signals generated by extended and distributed sources

Extracranial patterns of scalp potentials and magnetic fields, as measured with electro- and magnetoencephalography (EEG, MEG), are spatially widespread even when the underlying source in the brain is focal. Therefore, loss in signal magnitude due to cancellation is expected when multiple brain regions are simultaneously active. We characterized these cancellation effects in EEG and MEG using a forward model with sources constrained on an anatomically accurate reconstruction of the cortical surface. Prominent cancellation was found for both EEG and MEG in the case of multiple randomly distributed source dipoles, even when the number of simultaneous dipoles was small. Substantial cancellation occurred also for locally extended patches of simulated activity, when the patches extended to opposite walls of sulci and gyri. For large patches, a difference between EEG and MEG cancellation was seen, presumably due to selective cancellation of tangentially vs. radially oriented sources. Cancellation effects can be of importance when electrophysiological data are related to hemodynamic measures. Furthermore, the selective cancellation may be used to explain some observed differences between EEG and MEG in terms of focal vs. widespread cortical activity.

Interictal MEG/MSI in intractable mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: spike yield and characterization

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the ability of MEG to detect medial temporal spikes in patients with known medial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) and to use magnetic source imaging (MSI) with equivalent current dipoles to examine localization and orientation of spikes and their relation to surgical outcome.

METHODS

We prospectively obtained MSI on a total of 25 patients previously diagnosed with intractable MTLE. MEG was recorded with a 275 channel whole-head system with simultaneous 21-channel scalp EEG during inpatient admission one day prior to surgical resection. The patients' surgical outcomes were classified based on one-year follow-up after surgery.

RESULTS

Nineteen of the 22 patients (86.4%) had interictal spikes during the EEG and MEG recordings. Thirteen of 19 patients (68.4%) demonstrated unilateral temporal dipoles ipsilateral to the site of surgery. Among these patients, five (38.5%) patients had horizontal dipoles, one (7.7%) patient had vertical dipoles, and seven (53.8%) patients had both horizontal and vertical dipoles. Sixty percent of patients with non-localizing ictal scalp EEG had well-localized spikes on MSI ipsilateral to the side of surgery and 66.7% of patients with non-localizing MRI had well-localized spikes on MSI ipsilateral to the side of surgery. Concordance between MSI localization and the side of lobectomy was not associated with a likelihood of an excellent postsurgical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

MSI can detect medial temporal spikes. It may provide important localizing information in patients with MTLE, especially when MRI and/or ictal scalp EEG are not localizing.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study demonstrates that MSI has a good ability to detect interictal spikes from mesial temporal structures.

Magnetoencephalography and magnetic source imaging in epilepsy

Magnetoencephalograpy (MEG) and Electroencephalography (EEG) provide physicians with complementary data and should not be regarded as mutually exclusive evaluative methods of cerebral activity. Relevant to this edition, MEG applications related to the surgical treatment of epilepsy will be discussed exclusively. Combined MEG/EEG data collection and analysis should be a routine diagnostic practice for patients who are still suffering seizures due to the failure of drug therapy. Clinicians in the field of epilepsy agree that a greater number of patients would benefit from surgery than are currently referred for pre-surgical evaluation. Regardless of age or presumed epilepsy syndrome, all patients deserve the possibility of living seizure-free through surgery. Technological advances in superconducting elements as well as the digital revolution were necessary for the development of MEG into a clinically valuable diagnostic tool. Compared to the examination of electrical activity of the brain, investigation into its magnetic concomitant is a more recent development. In MEG, cerebral magnetic activity is recorded using magnetometer or gradiometer whole-head systems. MEG spikes usually have a shorter duration and a steeper ascending slope than EEG spikes, and variable phase relationships to EEG. When co-registered spikes are compared, it is apparent that EEG and MEG spikes differ. There is agreement among investigators that more interictal epileptiform spikes are seen in MEG than EEG. When MEG is co-registered with invasive intracranial EEG data, the detection rate of interictal epileptiform discharges depends on the number of electrocorticographic channels that record a spike. When patients have a non-localizing video-EEG recording, MEG pinpoints the resected area in 58-72% of the cases.

Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography

Although magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) have been available for decades, their relative merits are still debated. We examined regional differences in signal-to-noise-ratios (SNRs) of cortical sources in MEG and EEG. Data from four subjects were used to simulate focal and extended sources located on the cortical surface reconstructed from high-resolution magnetic resonance images. The SNR maps for MEG and EEG were found to be complementary. The SNR of deep sources was larger in EEG than in MEG, whereas the opposite was typically the case for superficial sources. Overall, the SNR maps were more uniform for EEG than for MEG. When using a noise model based on uniformly distributed random sources on the cortex, the SNR in MEG was found to be underestimated, compared with the maps obtained with noise estimated from actual recorded MEG and EEG data. With extended sources, the total area of cortex in which the SNR was higher in EEG than in MEG was larger than with focal sources. Clinically, SNR maps in a patient explained differential sensitivity of MEG and EEG in detecting epileptic activity. Our results emphasize the benefits of recording MEG and EEG simultaneously.

Magnetoencephalography for pediatric epilepsy: how we do it

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is increasingly being used in the preoperative evaluation of pediatric patients with epilepsy. The ability to noninvasively localize ictal onset zones (IOZ) and their relationships to eloquent functional cortex allows the pediatric epilepsy team to more accurately assess the likelihood of postoperative seizure freedom, while more precisely prognosticating the potential functional deficits that may be expected from resective surgery. Confirmation of clinically suggested multifocality may result in a recommendation against resective surgery because the probability of seizure freedom will be low. Current paradigms for motor and somatosensory testing are robust. Paradigms allowing localization of those regions necessary for competent language function, though promising, are under continuous optimization. MR imaging white matter trajectory data, created from diffusion tensor imaging obtained in the same setting as the localization brain MR imaging, provide ancillary information regarding connectivity of the IOZ to sites of rapid secondary spread and the spatial relationship of the IOZ to functionally important white matter bundles, such as the corticospinal tracts. A collaborative effort between neuroradiology, neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychology, technology, and physics ensures successful implementation of MEG within a pediatric epilepsy program.

Concordance between routine interictal magnetoencephalography and simultaneous scalp electroencephalography in a sample of patients with epilepsy

Both electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) localize epileptiform activity but may yield different results. This discordance may arise from different detection capabilities or from different data collection and interpretation techniques. Comparisons of MEG and EEG have focused on detection of individual spikes. However, side-by-side comparisons of results as used in the clinical setting is lacking. In this report, we present our empirical comparison. We reviewed 58 simultaneous MEG-EEG recordings (35 paired-sensors, 23 whole-head) from a diverse epilepsy population, comparing previous clinical MEG interpretations with new blinded EEG interpretations, noting lobar concordance of readers' judgments of regional abnormalities. A second-pass unblinded analysis, using all available clinical data, assessed the relative contribution and plausibility of the results of each technique. Concordance was high (85%) overall. Discordance was sometimes caused by constraints imposed by MEG dipole fitting techniques. Even when results of the techniques did not match, MEG often disambiguated the clinical scenario, especially when combined with imaging information. Thoughtful analysis of combined MEG-EEG datasets, beyond algorithm-based interictal spike detection, can help guide clinical decision-making even when concordance between techniques is imperfect. In some cases, EEG and MEG are synergistic and provide complementary information.

Spatial relationship of source localizations in patients with focal epilepsy: Comparison of MEG and EEG with a three spherical shells and a boundary element volume conductor model

Epilepsy surgery is an option for patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsies, but it requires a precise focus localization procedure. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) can be used for analysis of interictal activity. The aim of this prospective study was to compare clusters of source localization results with MEG and EEG using a three spherical shells (3SS) and a boundary element method (BEM) volume conductor model. The study was closed when 100 patients met the inclusion criteria. Simultaneous MEG and EEG were recorded during presurgical evaluation. Epileptiform signals were analyzed using an equivalent current dipole model. Centroids of source localizations from MEG, EEG, 3SS, and BEM in their respective combinations were compared. In a 3SS model, MEG source localizations were 5.6 mm inferior to those obtained by EEG, while in a BEM model MEG source localizations were 6.3 mm anterior and 4.8 mm superior. The mean scattering of source localizations between both volume conductor models was 19.5 mm for EEG and 9.6 mm for MEG. For MEG no systematic difference between BEM and 3SS source localizations was found. For EEG, source localizations with BEM were 5.9 mm posterior and 11.7 mm inferior to those determined using 3SS. No differences were found between the 46 temporal and the 54 extratemporal lobe epilepsy patients. The observed systematic differences of source localizations of epileptic spikes due to the applied source signal modality and volume conductor model should be considered in presurgical evaluation when only one source signal and volume conductor model is available.

MEG versus EEG: influence of background activity on interictal spike detection

The comparative sensitivity of EEG and magnetoencephalography (MEG) in the visual detection of focal epileptiform activity in simultaneous interictal sleep recordings were investigated. The authors examined 14 patients aged 3.5 to 17 years with localization-related epilepsy. Simultaneous 122-channel whole-head MEG and 33-channel EEG were recorded for 20 to 40 minutes during spontaneous sleep. The EEG and MEG data were separated and four blinded independent reviewers marked the presence and timing of epileptic discharges (ED) in the 28 data segments. EEG and MEG data were matched and spikes identified by at least three reviewers were classified in three categories according to the following criteria: type 1 MEG > EEG, type 2 EEG > MEG (type 1/2: difference of three or more raters), and type 3 EEG = MEG (three or more raters each). The presence of simultaneous sleep changes was visually determined for every single EEG-segment. Spikes with high spatiotemporal correlation were averaged and subjected to single dipole analysis of peak activity in EEG. Out of 4704 marked patterns, 1387 spikes fulfilled the above criteria. In fact, more spikes were unique to MEG (689) than to EEG (136) and to the combination of both modalities (562). ED were detected predominantly by MEG in eight patients and by EEG in two patients. The presence of vertex waves and spindles lead to a significantly higher number of spikes identified only in MEG. Averaging of type 1 spikes produced clear spike activity in EEG in 9 of 12 cases. On the contrary, only 2 of 10 type 2 spikes were visible in MEG after averaging. Dipoles of spikes visible in MEG showed a more tangential orientation compared with more radial dipoles of type 2 spikes. Spike characteristics, e.g., dipole orientation, are a key factor for a sole EEG representation. Exclusive MEG detection is more likely influenced by overlapping background activity in EEG. Because MEG is indifferent to radial activity, i.e., sleep changes, a higher ratio of spikes unique to MEG compared with EEG is detected in the case of overlapping sleep changes.

Plastic Phase-Locking and Magnetic Mismatch Response to Auditory Deviants in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

The magnetic equivalent (MMNm) of mismatch negativity may reflect auditory discrimination and sensory memory. To study whether temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) affects automatic central auditory-change processing, we recorded magnetoencephalographic (MEG) responses to standard and duration-deviant sounds in 12 TLE patients and 12 age-matched controls, and repeated MEG measurement in 8 patients 6-30 months following epilepsy surgery and in 6 controls 3-8 months after their first measurement. We compared the MMNm between patients and controls, and also evaluated intertrial phase coherences as indexed by phase-locking factors (PLF) using wavelet-based analyses. We observed longer MMNm latencies for patients than for controls. Dipole modeling and minimum-current estimates together showed bi-frontotemporal sources for MMNm. The phase locking across trials was dominant at the 4- to 14-Hz band, and the main difference in PLF between deviant- and standard-evoked responses occurred in the time frame of 150-250 ms after stimulus onset. Notably, in the 5 patients who became seizure free after removal of right temporal epileptic focus, the phase-locking phenomena resulting from deviant stimuli were enhanced, and even more distributed in the frontotemporal regions. We conclude that mesial TLE might affect auditory-change detection, and a successful surgery causes a possible plastic change in phase locking of deviant-evoked signals.

Automated localization of magnetoencephalographic interictal spikes by adaptive spatial filtering

OBJECTIVE

Automated adaptive spatial filtering techniques can be applied to magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data collected from people with epilepsy. Source waveforms estimated by these methods have higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) than spontaneous MEG data, allowing identification and location of interictal spikes. The software tool SAM(g(2)) provides an adaptive spatial filtering algorithm for MEG data that yields source images of excess kurtosis and provides source time-courses in voxels exhibiting high excess kurtosis. The sensitivity and specificity of SAM(g(2)) in epilepsy is unknown.

METHODS

Interictal MEG data from 36 patients with intractable epilepsy were analyzed using SAM(g(2)), and results compared with equivalent current dipole (ECD) fit procedures.

RESULTS

When SNR of interictal spikes was high (compared to background) with a clear single focus, in most cases there was good agreement between ECD and SAM(g(2)). With multiple foci, there was typically overlap but imperfect concordance between results of ECD and SAM(g(2)).

CONCLUSIONS

SAM(g(2)) may in some cases be equivalent to manual ECD fit for localizing interictal spikes with single locus and good SNR. Further studies are required to validate SAM(g(2)) with multiple foci or poor SNR.

SIGNIFICANCE

In some cases, SAM(g(2)) might eventually assist or replace manual ECD analysis of MEG data.

Revisiting the role of magnetoencephalography in epilepsy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review considers the current role of magnetoencephalography in clinical epileptology.

RECENT FINDINGS

While magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography complement each other for interictal spike detection, magnetoencephalography is more sensitive in neocortical epilepsy. In temporal lobe epilepsy, magnetoencephalography can attribute epileptic activity to subcompartments of the temporal lobe and differentiate between patients with mesial, lateral and diffuse seizure onsets. In extratemporal epilepsy, magnetoencephalography provides unique information in nonlesional cases and helps to define the relationship of epileptic activity with respect to lesions and eloquent cortex. Magnetoencephalography also contributes to the clinical decision process in patients with cortical dysplasias, Landau-Kleffner syndrome and recurrent seizures after prior epilepsy surgery. Magnetoencephalography-guided re-evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging helps to reveal previously unrecognized lesions. In a presurgical setting interictal magnetoencephalography was superior to scalp electroencephalography. Complete resection of the magnetoencephalography-defined irritative zone has prognostic implications on postoperative seizure control. Magnetoencephalography can reliably localize sensorimotor and language cortex. Disadvantages of this technique include the difficulties in obtaining ictal recordings and the considerable costs involved.

SUMMARY

Magnetoencephalography has been developed to a valuable noninvasive tool in clinical epileptology. The development of approaches which take into account both magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography simultaneously should provide more useful information in the future.

The value of multichannel MEG and EEG in the presurgical evaluation of 70 epilepsy patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the sensitivity of a simultaneous whole-head 306-channel magnetoencephalography (MEG)/70-electrode EEG recording to detect interictal epileptiform activity (IED) in a prospective, consecutive cohort of patients with medically refractory epilepsy that were considered candidates for epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

Seventy patients were prospectively evaluated by simultaneously recorded MEG/EEG. All patients were surgical candidates or were considered for invasive EEG monitoring and had undergone an extensive presurgical evaluation at a tertiary epilepsy center. MEG and EEG raw traces were analysed individually by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

MEG data could not be evaluated due to excessive magnetic artefacts in three patients (4%). In the remaining 67 patients, the overall sensitivity to detect IED was 72% (48/67 patients) for MEG and 61% for EEG (41/67 patients) analysing the raw data. In 13% (9/67 patients), MEG-only IED were recorded, whereas in 3% (2/67 patients) EEG-only IED were recorded. The combined sensitivity was 75% (50/67 patients).

CONCLUSION

Three hundred and six-channel MEG has a similarly high sensitivity to record IED as EEG and appears to be complementary. In one-third of the EEG-negative patients, MEG can be expected to record IED, especially in the case of lateral neocortical epilepsy and/or cortical dysplasia.

Movement quantity and frequency coding in human motor areas

Studies of movement coding have indicated a relationship between functional MRI signals and increasing frequency of movement in primary motor cortex and other motor-related structures. However, prior work has typically used block-designs and fixed-time intervals across the varying movements frequencies that may prevent ready distinction of brain mechanisms related to movement quantity and, especially, movement frequency. Here, we obtained functional MRI signals from humans working in an event-related design to extract independent activation related to movement quantity or movement frequency. Participants tapped once, twice, or thrice at 1, 2, or 3 Hz, and the tapping evoked activation related to movement quantity in the precentral and postcentral gyri, supplementary motor area, cerebellum, putamen, and thalamus. Increasing movement frequency failed to yield activation in these motor-related areas, although linear movement frequency affects occurred in nonmotor regions of cortex and subcortex. Our results do not replicate prior data suggesting movement frequency encoding in motor-related areas; instead we observed movement quantity coding in motor-related brain areas. The discrepancy between prior studies and this study likely relates to methodology concerns. We suggest that the movement quantity relationships in human motor areas and encoding of movement frequency in nonmotor areas may reflect a functional anatomical substrate for mediating distinct movement parameters.

Differences in MEG/EEG Epileptic Spike Yields Explained by Regional Differences in Signal-to-Noise Ratios

Controversy remains regarding the preferred modality, magnetoencephalography (MEG) or EEG, for the presurgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy. In general, it appears that the spike yields for MEG and EEG are similar in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy, and that for neocortical epilepsy the MEG spike yields may be larger than for EEG. In general, MEG/EEG spike yields depend on factors such as (1) the number of sensors, (2) the source depth and orientation, (3) the background activity, and (4) the smearing of the potential fields due to variations in skull resistivity in EEG. Because the contribution of all these factors are of the same order of magnitude, the authors took them all into account to predict the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of hypothetical spikes in different brain areas. In this study, it was assumed that spike sensitivity (and therefore the spike yield) increases with SNR. The estimated SNR values at temporal areas were comparable for MEG and EEG, which is in agreement with clinical findings that spike yields in temporal lobe epilepsy are similar. Furthermore, the SNR of MEG was substantially higher in the frontal area, indicating that in frontal lobe epilepsy MEG may be highly relevant to prescreening of epilepsy patients. This model-based approach indicates that SNR mapping clarifies differences between MEG and EEG findings that are difficult to understand on the basis of patient studies only.

Neuromagnetic measurement of unilateral temporo-parietal theta rhythm in patients with internal carotid artery occlusive disease

Rhythmic theta activity detected by electroencephalography (EEG) may be correlated with cerebrovascular brain diseases. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) has higher sensitivity and spatial resolution than conventional scalp EEG, so may be a better method to detect theta rhythm in patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusive disease. Simultaneous EEG and MEG were performed in the awake state in 48 patients with unilateral (n = 42) or bilateral (n = 6) stenotic lesions (more than 60% occlusion) of the ICA (n = 47) or middle cerebral artery (n = 7), and in 27 age-matched healthy normal subjects. No subject had severe neurological deficits. MEG detected the theta rhythm (6-8 Hz) in 14 of 48 patients: ipsilateral to the stenotic or occluded side in 13 hemispheres and bilaterally in one patient with unilateral lesion. The source of the MEG theta rhythm was estimated in the dorsolateral temporo-parietal area, regardless of the location of infarct foci or the stenotic portion of the ICA system. The temporo-parietal theta rhythm was separated from the occipital alpha rhythm by frequency and distribution in MEG. The theta rhythm was found in only two patients by EEG, as well as by MEG. MEG provided better separation of this theta rhythm from the occipital alpha rhythm. Neither MEG nor EEG detected this theta rhythm in the normal subjects. Unilateral temporo-parietal theta rhythm is correlated with the hemisphere with ICA occlusive disease. This rhythm may indicate mild or subclinical abnormalities in the ICA system. MEG is superior to EEG for the detection and localization of theta rhythm.

Detection of epileptiform activity by human interpreters: blinded comparison between electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography

PURPOSE

Objectively to evaluate whether independent spike detection by human interpreters is clinically valid in magnetoencephalography (MEG) and to characterize detection differences between MEG and scalp electroencephalography (EEG).

METHODS

We simultaneously recorded scalp EEG and MEG data from 43 patients with intractable focal epilepsy. Raw EEG and MEG waveforms were reviewed independently by two experienced epileptologists, one for EEG and one for MEG, blinded to the other modality and to the clinical information. The number and localization of spikes detected by EEG and/or MEG were compared in relation to clinical diagnosis based on postoperative seizure freedom.

RESULTS

Interictal spikes were captured in both EEG and MEG in 31, in MEG alone in eight, in EEG alone in one, and in neither modality in three patients. The number of detections ranged widely with no statistical difference between modalities. A median of 25.7% of total spikes was detectable by both modalities. Spike localization was similarly consistent with the epilepsy diagnosis in 85.2% (EEG) and 78.1% (MEG) of the patients. Inaccurate localization occurred only in those cases with very few spikes detected, especially when the detections were in one modality alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Interictal epileptiform discharges are easily perceived in MEG. Independent spike identification in MEG can provide clinical results comparable, but not superior, to EEG. Many spikes were seen in only one modality or the other; therefore the use of both EEG and MEG may provide additional information.

Combined MEG/EEG analysis of the interictal spike complex in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

We studied the functional organization of the interictal spike complex in 30 patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) using combined magnetoencephalography (MEG)/electroencephalography (EEG) recordings. Spikes could be recorded in 14 patients (47%) during the 2- to 3-h MEG/EEG recording session. The MEG and EEG spikes were subjected to separate dipole analyses; the MEG spike dipole localizations were superimposed on MRI scans. All spike dipoles could be localized to the temporal lobe with a clear preponderance in the medial region. Based on dipole orientations in MEG, patients could be classified into two groups: patients with anterior medial vertical (AMV) dipoles, suggesting epileptic activity in the mediobasal temporal lobe and patients with anterior medial horizontal (AMH) dipoles, indicating involvement of the temporal pole and the anterior parts of the lateral temporal lobe. Whereas patients with AMV dipoles had strictly unitemporal interictal and ictal EEG changes during prolonged video-EEG monitoring, 50% of patients with AMH dipoles showed evidence of bitemporal affection on interictal and ictal EEG. Nine patients underwent epilepsy surgery so far. Whereas all five patients with AMV dipoles became completely seizure-free postoperatively (Class Ia), two out of four patients with AMH dipoles experienced persistent auras (Class Ib). This difference, however, was not statistically significant. We therefore conclude that combined MEG/EEG dipole modeling can identify subcompartments of the temporal lobe involved in epileptic activity and may be helpful to differentiate between subtypes of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy noninvasively.

Magnetoencephalographic spikes not detected by conventional electroencephalography

OBJECTIVE

To investigate some of the reasons why magnetoencephalographic (MEG) spikes are at times not apparent in conventional electroencephalograms (EEG) when the data are co-registered, and to explore to what extent modern EEG analysis methods can improve the yield.

METHODS

Seventy seconds of MEG-EEG co-registration on a 122 channel Neuromag system were studied in a 10-year-old boy with Landau-Kleffner syndrome. Twenty-six EEG channels were originally recorded with a left ear reference. The EEG data were subsequently reformatted (BESA) to a variety of montages for the 10-20 and 10-10 electrode array. A 10 s data epoch was compared in detail for concordance between MEG and EEG spikes. To detect the characteristics of hidden low voltage EEG spikes, MEG spikes were averaged and compared with the concomitant averaged EEG spike.

RESULTS

While there was an abundance of EEG as well as MEG spikes on the left; definite right-sided spikes were not visible in the EEG. Right hemispheric MEG spikes were, however, plentiful with an average strength of 757 fT. When the individual MEG spikes from the right hemisphere were compared with the corresponding EEG events their amplitude ranged between 24 and 31 microV and were, therefore, indistinguishable from background activity. The majority of them became visible, however, with further sophisticated data analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

When the relative merits of MEG versus EEG recordings for the detection of epileptogenic spike are investigated the 10-20 system of electrode placement and conventional methods of EEG analysis do not provide optimal data assessment. The use of the 10-10 electrode array combined with modern methods of digital data analysis can provide better concordance with MEG data.