Comprehensive review of the management of internal mammary lymph node metastases in breast cancer

Five decades of progress in surgical oncology: Breast

Surgery remains the single most effective treatment for breast cancer but coincident with a deeper understanding of tumor biology and advances in multidisciplinary care (encompassing breast imaging, systemic adjuvant therapy, radiotherapy, and genomics) continues to de-escalate, supported by strong level I data. We have moved from mastectomy to breast conservation, and from routine axillary dissection to sentinel lymph node biopsy to selective omission of axillary node staging altogether. We have further de-escalated through consensus over margin width in breast conservation, through improvements in neoadjuvant therapy, and by demonstrating no benefit for upfront surgery in patients with stage IV disease. For patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, reconservation surgery and reirradiation are promising. Cell cycle and immune checkpoint inhibitors, when added to conventional systemic therapy, have now moved beyond stage IV disease to phase III trials in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, promising even further de-escalation of surgery. Finally, with genomic profiling we are moving away from the primacy of axillary node status for prognostication and into a new era allowing prediction of response to therapy.

Sentinel node occult lesion localization technique for impalpable breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Mammographic screening has enabled earlier detection of breast cancer, with 25-35% of malignancies being non-palpable at diagnosis. Accurate removal and sentinel node biopsy for staging these lesions are crucial to successful management. Both these aspects are achieved by peritumoural localization with radioisotope and lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel lymph node (SN) mapping using the sentinel node and occult lesion localization (SNOLL) technique. This study reports SNOLL outcomes in a large cohort of women with non-palpable breast cancers to assess its performance and promote its logistic advantages.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used data from BreastSurgANZ Quality Audit supplemented with private case notes. Inclusion criteria were females >18 years, with invasive breast cancer that was asymptomatic and non-palpable at presentation, who underwent SNOLL (n = 450). Primary outcomes were proportion of successful lesion localization, proportion of patients requiring re-excision and volume of tissue excised. Secondary outcomes focused on lymphoscintigraphy success rate in detecting sentinel nodes and SN positivity rates.

RESULTS

Tumours were successfully removed with the initial SNOLL procedure in 449 cases (99.8%). The re-excision rate was 15.1% (n = 68). The mean total excision volume was 54.69 cm3 (95% CI 51.49-57.88 cm3 ; range 2.75-195.33 cm3 ), with a mean closest circumferential margin of 7.05 mm (95% CI 6.60-7.49 mm; range 0 to ≥10 mm). Lymphoscintigraphy was successful in 96.9% (n = 436) of cases. Sentinel nodes were successfully identified and removed in 99.6% (n = 448) of cases. SN positivity rate was 18.4%.

CONCLUSION

SNOLL is an efficient and effective technique for localizing non-palpable invasive breast lesions while simultaneously identifying sentinel nodes.

A Randomized Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Methylene Blue Dye Alone Versus Combination of Methylene Blue Dye and Radioactive Sulfur Colloid in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Early Stage Breast Cancer Patients

Although sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become a standard of care for management of axilla in breast cancer patients, the technique of SLNB is still not well defined. Unlike radioactive sulfur colloid which requires nuclear medicine facilities, methylene blue dye is readily available. The purpose of this study is to validate the use of methylene blue dye alone for SLNB in early breast cancer patients. 60 patients of early breast cancer were randomized to receive either methylene blue alone (Group A-30 patients) or a combination of both methylene blue and radioactive colloid (Group B-30 patients) for detection of sentinel lymph nodes. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was done followed by complete axillary dissection in all patients. In both Groups A and B, sentinel node was identified in all 30 patients, giving identification rate of 100%. In group A, sentinel node was the only positive node in 1 patient, with a false-positive rate of 14.2%. The negative predictive value was 91.3%. The sensitivity of the procedure in predicting further axillary disease was 75% with a specificity of 95.45%. The overall accuracy was 90%. In group B, sentinel node was the only positive node in 2 cases, giving a false-positive rate of 28.7%. The negative predictive value was 95.65%. The sensitivity of the procedure in predicting further axillary disease was 83.33% with a specificity of 91.67%. The overall accuracy was 90%. Although the false-negative rate was slightly higher with methylene blue alone than that using combination (8.6%-4.3%), it was statistically insignificant. Similarly the sensitivity (75%-83.33%), specificity (95.45-91.67%), and negative predictive value (91.3%-95.67%) were also comparable between groups A and B, respectively. Negative predictive value and false-negative rates are comparable, whether blue dye is used alone or a combination of blue dye and radioactive colloid is used. Sentinel lymph node biopsy with blue dye alone is reliable and can be put to clinical practice more widely, even if nuclear medicine facilities are not available in resource constrained centers, so as to reduce long-term morbidity of axillary dissection, with similar oncological outcomes.

Radiotherapy for initial clinically positive internal mammary nodes in breast cancer

Purpose

Internal mammary lymph node (IMN) involvement is associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer. This study investigated the treatment outcomes of initial clinically IMN-positive breast cancer patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), including IMN irradiation, following primary breast surgery.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data of 95 breast cancer patients with clinically detected IMNs at diagnosis treated with surgery and RT between June 2009 and December 2015. Patients received adjuvant RT to the whole breast/chest wall and regional lymph node (axillary, internal mammary, and supraclavicular) areas. Twelve patients received an additional boost to the IMN area.

Results

The median follow-up was 43.2 months (range, 4.5 to 100.5 months). Among 77 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 52 (67.5%) showed IMN normalization and 19 (24.6%) showed a partial response to IMN. There were 3 and 24 cases of IMN failure and any recurrence, respectively. The 5-year IMN failure-free survival, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were 96%, 70%, and 84%, respectively. IMN failure-free survival was significantly affected by resection margin status (97.7% if negative, 87.5% for close or positive margins; p = 0.009). All three patients with IMN failure had initial IMN size ≥1 cm and did not receive IMN boost irradiation. The median age of the three patients was 31 years, and all had hormone receptor-negative tumors.

Conclusion

RT provides excellent IMN control without the support of IMN surgery. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, including IMN boost for breast cancer patients, is a safe and effective technique for regional lymph node irradiation.

Radical chest wall resection and modified reconstruction technique for solitary internal mammary lymph node recurrence in breast cancer

•

Solitary internal mammary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patient.

•

Radical enbloc surgical resection of part of manubrium, hemi sternum two ribs and internal mammary lymph node.

•

Modified chest wall reconstruction technique provides better chest wall stability and cosmoses.

•

There is minimal chance of MMS plate excursion or dislodgment which is the most dreadful complication in chest wall reconstruction.

•

To date the patient is disease free.

Introduction

Although the incidence of internal mammary lymph node recurrence rate in breast cancer is low but still it is the second most common drainage site after axilla. Patients with solitary internal mammary lymph node (IMLN) recurrence have overall better prognosis. The role of chemo and radiotherapy in internal mammary lymph node involvement with breast cancer is still controversial. Radical surgical resection and reconstruction remains mainstay for good prognosis.

Presentation of case

Here in we present a case of a 32 year old female with breast cancer who had left mastectomy followed by adjuvant chemo radiotherapy treatment for adenocarcinoma of breast in 2008. She presented with upper left parasternal pain in 2009. Computed tomographic scan (CT) of her thorax showed internal mammary lymph node enlargement, likely metastasis. We performed modified surgical reconstruction after enbloc radical resection of part of manubrium; hemi sternum, chest wall and left parasternal IMLN. Patient remained disease free to date.

Discussion

There is no standard treatment after IMLN metastasis. Previous surgical studies reported no survival benefit with ERM, but is there any role of adjuvant locoregional radiotherapy or systemic therapy to prevent relapses in IMLN is a matter of debate.

Conclusion

To the best of our knowledge this is first case ever managed with radical enbloc surgical resection and modified reconstruction of chest wall using such technique. Our reconstruction technique provides better chest wall stability with minimal risk of plate dislodgement or excursion and at the same time provides good cosmoses and better survival.

Clinical significance of internal mammary lymph node metastasis for breast cancer: Analysis of 337 breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

Internal mammary nodes (IMNs) is a major pathway of lymphatic drainage for breast cancer, apart from axillary lymph node (ALN). However, owing to lack of a feasible and safe biopsy method, management of IMNs is still controversial in breast surgery.

METHODS

From 2005 to 2009, a total of 337 consecutive breast cancer women patients were recruited. All patients underwent IMNs biopsy through intercostal space or endoscopic lymphatic chain resection. The ER, PR and HER-2 status were retested according to the current ASCO/CAP guidelines. We analyzed the relationship between clinical pathological parameters and IMNs metastasis and investigated the high risk factors and prognostic values of IMNs metastasis in breast cancer.

RESULTS

Among 337 patients, 314 patients underwent intercostal space IMNs biopsy and 23 patients underwent endoscopic lymphatic chain resection. A total of 63 (18.69%) patients were pathologically diagnosed with IMNs metastasis. Among them, 28 (44.44%) patients changed the pathological lymph node staging, and 15 cases (23.81%) changed the postoperative comprehensive treatment program and accepted extended postoperative radiotherapy. Multivariate analysis showed that compared with no ALN involvement, the risk of IMNs metastasis was significantly increased in patients with 1-3 ALN involvement (OR = 42.097, 95% CI = 5.225-339.178; P = 0.0004) and ≥4 ALN involvement (OR = 82.429, 95%CI = 10.134-670.496; P < 0.0001). The risk of IMNs metastasis in HER-2 positive patients was significantly higher than that in negative patients (OR = 5.452, 95% CI = 2.353-12.634; P < 0.0001). However, we did not find IMNs involvement was an independent indicator for both overall survival and disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our clinical practice and data indicated that IMNs biopsy through intercostal space and endoscopic lymphatic chain resection are effective and minimally invasive methods to detect the IMNs status, which may be helpful for accurate tumor staging, risk assessment and option of chemotherapy or radiotherapy to improve the patients' survival.

Does the TNM classification of solitary internal mammary lymph node metastases in breast cancer still apply?

PURPOSE

TNM classification of solitary internal mammary lymph node metastases (IMLNMs) in breast cancer varies depending on their method of detection: sentinel lymph node biopsy (pN1b) or clinical examination including radiological and/or physical examination (pN2b). This study aimed to evaluate whether there is a difference in prognosis between both groups.

METHODS

Data of all patients diagnosed with primary invasive epithelial breast cancer between 2005 and 2008 were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients with IMLNMs were divided in groups according to their pN1b and pN2b status. The main outcome measures disease-free survival (DFS) after 5 years and overall survival (OS) after 8 years were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Cox regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors for DFS and OS.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients with pN1b status and 28 patients with pN2b status were included. DFS rate was 74.1% in the pN1b group compared to 85.0% in the pN2b group (p = 0.211). Regarding OS, 20.5% (pN1b) and 25.0% (pN2b) of the patients deceased within 8 years of follow-up (p = 0.589). In multivariable cox regression analysis, nodal status was not statistically significant for DFS (HR 0.29 [95% CI 0.04-2.33], p = 0.244) or OS (HR 1.04 [95% CI 0.37-2.89], p = 0.947).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the TNM classification considers pN1b and pN2b to be distinct prognostic entities, we did not observe any prognostic differences between these groups. Therefore, solitary IMLNMs may be regarded as a single category in the future and revision of TNM classification should be considered.

Prognostic implication of the tumor location according to molecular subtypes in axillary lymph node-positive invasive ductal cancer in a Korean population

Previous studies have not considered the axillary lymph node status when investigating the prognostic role of tumor location according to each molecular subtype. The present study aimed to investigate the prognostic implication of tumor location according to each molecular subtype in Korean invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) patients with axillary lymph node metastasis. Data from 7856 Korean IDC women with axillary lymph node metastasis were retrospectively analyzed. According to tumor location, patients were divided into the following groups: upper-outer quadrant, lower-outer quadrant, upper-inner quadrant, lower-inner quadrant (LIQ), and central group. Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated according to tumor location and molecular subtype. A subgroup analysis based on tumor size categorization was also performed. The patients' mean age was 47.97 ± 9.64 years, and the median follow-up time was 90 months. The LIQ group showed significantly worse prognosis in OS and BCSS (76.4 and 83.3 %, respectively) compared with the other groups, which was only significant in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression and triple-negative (TN) subtypes. In the subgroup analysis according to tumor size, the LIQ group showed a significantly worse prognosis in OS and BCSS compared with the other groups, in HER2 and TN subtypes, and only in patients with more than T2 stage. In Korean IDC patients with axillary lymph node metastasis, LIQ tumor location was associated with poor prognosis among those with HER2 and TN molecular subtypes and especially in those with more than T2 stage.

Prognostic significance of nodal involvement region in clinical stage IIIc breast cancer patients who received primary systemic treatment, surgery, and radiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prognostic influence of involvement of both internal mammary nodes (IMNs) and supraclavicular nodes (SCNs) in clinical stage IIIc breast cancer patients who underwent primary systemic treatment, surgery, and radiotherapy (RT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2001 and 2009, 110 breast cancer patients with IMN or SCN involvement were treated with primary systemic treatment followed by surgery and RT. The median age was 50 years. Clinical N-stage was cN3b and cN3c in 29 (26.4%) and 81 (73.6%) patients, respectively. Among the 81 patients with cN3c disease, 18 patients had both IMN and SCN involvement. Primary systemic treatment regimen was most commonly doxorubicin plus docetaxel (54.5%) or cyclophosphamide (20.0%). Mastectomy was performed in 71 (64.5%) patients. The RT dose delivered to the chest wall or whole breast was 50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions. IMN and SCN regions were irradiated in 77 (70.0%) and 107 (97.6%) patients, respectively.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 57.4 months (range, 8.6-149.9 months), 44 patients (40.0%) developed disease recurrence. Among the 18 patients with both IMN and SCN involvement, 12 patients experienced disease recurrence and 11 of them had distant metastases. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of all patients were 60.2% and 75.5%, respectively. Decreased DFS and OS were observed in the 18 patients with both IMN and SCN involvement (5-year rates, 33.3% and 50.0%; P = 0.0051 and 0.0010, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Involvement of both IMNs and SCNs was associated with worse survival outcomes in patients with clinical stage IIIc breast cancer.

Prognostic Significance of Tumor-Positive Internal Mammary Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer has renewed interest in lymphatic drainage to the internal mammary (IM) nodes. The clinical impact of tumor positive IM nodes is not completely clear. This study evaluated the incidence and impact on overall survival of metastatic IM SLNs.

METHODS

Between 1997 and 2010, 3685 patients underwent surgery including SLNB for primary breast cancer following an intratumoral or peritumoral radioactive-tracer injection. The presence of lymph node metastases was categorized according to the TNM-classification. Cumulative overall survival was estimated and the influence of metastases in the IM nodes and other factors was assessed by Cox-regression-analysis.

RESULTS

In 754 patients (20.5 %) ipsilateral IM lymph nodes were visualized on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, retrieval rate of IM SLNs was 81.0 %. IM metastases were detected in 130 patients (21.3 % of retrieved SLNs and 3.5 % of all patients respectively). The presence of IM metastases was associated with axillary metastases (p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 61.2 months, 10.9 % of patients had died. In a multivariate analysis IM metastases did not have a significant effect on overall survival [HR] 1.20; CI: 0.73-1.98. In patients without axillary metastases (n = 2398), the presence of IM metastases (n = 43) was associated with worse survival [HR] 2.68; 95 % CI: 1.30-5.54.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the presence of IM metastases did not effect overall survival independent of other prognostic factors including axillary metastases. However, the small subgroup of patients who had IM metastases alone had worse outcome than patients without any regional lymph node metastases.

Lymphoscintigraphy with peritumoral injection versus lymphoscintigraphy with subdermal periareolar injection of technetium-labeled human albumin to identify sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is without doubt a valid method for the detection of the sentinel lymph node (SLN). There has been considerable debate regarding the optimal site for the introduction of the tracer; various sites include peritumoral (PT), periareolar (PA), subdermal, and intradermal injection.

PURPOSE

To evaluate retrospectively the lymphoscintigraphic identification rate of peritumoral (PT) injection versus subdermal periareolar (PA) injection in the detection of SLNs in breast cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between October 2002 and December 2011, a cohort of 906 consecutive patients with biopsy proven breast cancer underwent 914 SLN biopsy procedures. A total of 339 procedures (Group A) were performed using a PT deep injection of radiotracer while 575 procedures (Group B) adopted a subdermal PA injection of radiotracer towards the upper outer quadrant, regardless of the site of the carcinoma. All the patients underwent synchronous excision of the breast cancer and SLN biopsy.

RESULTS

SLNs were identified in the lymphoscintigram in 308/339 cases (90.85%) of Group A (PT injection) and in 537/575 cases (93.39%) of Group B (PA injection). Furthermore, in 2/339 patients (0.58%) of Group A, internal mammary lymph nodes were found at lymphoscintigraphy, whereas no internal mammary sentinel nodes were found in the Group B patients. The intraoperative identification rate of axillary SLNs was 99.41% (337 of 339) in the Group A patients and 99.65% (573 of 575) in the Group B patients. There was no significant difference in the two groups between the incidence of the number of SLNs detected and the incidence of identification of positive SLNs.

CONCLUSION

PT versus PA injection of radiotracer showed comparable success rates for axillary SLN identification, and can be considered a rapid and reliable method.

Detection of internal mammary lymph node metastasis with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with stage III breast cancer

PURPOSE

The present study assessed the positive predictive value (PPV) of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the detection of internal mammary node (IMN) metastasis in patients with clinical stage III breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed with clinical stage III breast cancer and underwent pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT were retrospectively analyzed. The (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans were prospectively reviewed by two board-certified nuclear medicine physicians in a blinded manner. The intensities of IMNs were graded into four categories (no activity and lower, similar, and higher activities than that of the mediastinal blood pool). IMNs were measured from the combined CT (largest diameter of the short axis). Histologic data of the IMNs were obtained by ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy or surgical excision. The PPV was calculated for pathologically confirmed IMNs. Visual grade, maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax), and sizes were analyzed according to the pathology results.

RESULTS

There were 249 clinical stage III breast cancer patients (age 48.0 ± 10.1 years, range 26-79 years) who had undergone initial (18)F-FDG PET/CT prior to treatment. Excluding 33 cases of stage IV breast cancer, 62 of 216 patients had visible IMNs on (18)F-FDG PET/CT, and histologic confirmation was obtained in 31 patients. There were 27 metastatic and four nonmetastatic nodes (PPV 87.1%). Metastatic nodes mostly presented with visual grade 3 (83.9%), and SUVmax and size were 3.5 ± 4.3 and 5.6 ± 2.0 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

(18)F-FDG PET/CT has a high PPV for IMN metastasis in clinical stage III breast cancer, indicating the possibility of metastasis in IMNs with FDG uptake similar to/lower than that of the blood pool or small-sized nodes.

Impact of internal mammary lymph node drainage identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy on outcomes in patients with stage I to III breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Involvement of internal mammary (IM) lymph nodes is associated with a poor prognosis for patients with breast cancer. This study examined the effect of drainage to IM nodes identified by lymphoscintigraphy on oncologic outcomes.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained breast cancer patient database at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center was used to identify patients with stage I to III breast cancer who underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with peritumoral injection of colloid and intraoperative lymphatic mapping from 1996 to 2005. Medical records were reviewed of 1772 patients who had drainage to any lymph node basin on lymphoscintigraphy but who did not undergo IM nodal biopsy. Patients with IM drainage, with or without axillary drainage, were compared with patients without IM drainage. Local-regional recurrence, distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

We identified IM drainage in 334 patients (18.8%). Patients with IM drainage were significantly younger, less likely to have upper outer quadrant tumors, and more likely to have smaller and medial tumors than patients without IM drainage. Rates of IM irradiation did not differ between the 2 groups. The median follow-up time was 7.4 years. On multivariate analysis, IM drainage was significantly associated with a worse DDFS (hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.6; P = .04) but not local-regional recurrence or overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

IM drainage on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was found to be significantly associated with worse DDFS. Further study is needed to determine the role of lymphoscintigraphy in the personalization of breast cancer staging and therapy.

Long-term outcome of internal mammary lymph node detected by lymphoscintigraphy in early breast cancer

Purpose

Internal mammary lymph node (IMLN) metastasis is an important prognostic indicator in breast cancer. However, the necessity of internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy for accurate staging, for choosing adjuvant treatment, and as a prognostic indicator, has remained controversial.

Methods

From January 2001 to December 2006, 525 female breast cancer patients underwent radical surgery after preoperative lymphatic scintigraphy. We retrospectively analyzed the follow-up results, recurrences, and deaths of all patients.

Results

There was no significant difference in the clinicopathological characteristics between the axilla and the IMLN groups. The median follow-up period was 118.8 months (range, 7-122 months) in the axilla group and 107.7 months (range, 14-108 months) in the IMLN group. During the median follow-up period, the breast cancer-related death rate in the axilla group was 3.6%, which was not significantly different from that of the IMLN group (1.3%) (p=0.484). The five-year survival rates did not differ between the two groups (p=0.306). The overall recurrence rate and the locoregional recurrence rate also did not differ between the two groups (p=0.835 and p=0.582, respectively). The recurrence rate of IMLN (both ipsilateral and contralateral) metastasis was very low, accounting for 0.5% in the axilla group and 1.3% in the IMLN group (p=0.416).

Conclusion

The long-term follow-up results showed that there was no significant difference in both overall outcome and regional recurrence between the two groups. Therefore, the requirement for identification of nodal basins outside the axilla or IMLN sentinel biopsy should be reconsidered.

Which patients need an axillary clearance after sentinel node biopsy?

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a safe and accurate minimally invasive method for detecting axillary lymph node (ALN) involvement in the clinically negative axilla thereby reducing morbidity in patients who avoid unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Although current guidelines recommend completion ALND when macro- and micrometastatic diseases are identified by SLNB, the benefit of this surgical intervention is under debate. Additionally, the management of the axilla in the presence of isolated tumour cells (ITCs) in SLNB is questioned. Particularly controversial is the prognostic significance of minimal SLNB metastasis in relation to local recurrence and overall survival. Preliminary results of the recently published Z0011 trial suggest similar outcomes after SNB or ALND when the SN is positive, but this finding has to be interpreted with caution.

Internal mammary lymph node recurrence: rare but characteristic metastasis site in breast cancer

Background

To assess the frequency of IMLN recurrence, its associated risk factors with disease-free interval (DFI) and its predicting factors on overall survival time.

Methods

133 cases of breast cancer IMLN recurrence were identified via the computerized CT reporting system between February 2003 and June 2008, during which chest CT for patients with breast cancer (n = 8867) were performed consecutively at Cancer Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Patients' charts were retrieved and patients' characteristics, disease characteristics, and treatments after recurrence were collected for analysis. The frequency was 1.5% (133/8867).

Results

IMLN recurrence was presented as the first metastatic site in 121 (91%) patients while 88 (66.2%) had other concurrent metastases. Typical chest CT images included swelling of the IMLN at the ipsilateral side with local lump and sternal erosion located mostly between the second and third intercostal space. The median disease-free interval (DFI) of IMLN recurrence was 38 months. The independent factors that could delay the IMLN recurrence were small tumor size (HR 0.5 95%CI: 0.4 - 0.8; p = 0.002), and positive ER/PR disease (HR 0.6, 95% CI: 0.4 - 0.9; p = 0.006). The median survival time after IMLN recurrence was 42 months, with a 5-year survival rate of 30%. Univariate analysis showed four variables significantly influenced the survival time: DFI of IMLN recurrence (p = 0.001), no concurrent distant metastasis (p = 0.024), endocrine therapy for patients with positive ER/PR (p = 0.000), radiotherapy (p = 0.040). The independent factors that reduced the death risk were no concurrent distant metastases (HR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.4 - 0.9; p = 0.031), endocrine therapy for patients with positive ER/PR status (HR: 0.2, 95% CI: 0.1 - 0.5; p = 0.001) and palliative radiotherapy (HR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1- 0.9; p = 0.026).

Conclusions

The risk of IMLN recurrence is low and there are certain characteristics features on CT images. ER/PR status is both a risk factor for DFI of IMLN recurrence and a prognostic factor for overall survival after IMLN recurrence. Patients with only IMLN recurrence and/or local lesion have a good prognosis.

The Role of Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Staging of Breast Cancer

The widespread application of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the evaluation of patients with breast cancer has allowed for the more limited, selective treatment of regional lymph nodes and decreased the number of complete regional dissections performed in patients without nodal metastases. Surgical excision and pathologic evaluation of nodes for metastases allow for reliable staging and prediction of additional lymph node metastases. Sentinel lymph node biopsy also enables a meticulous histologic evaluation of multiple sections augmented by immunohistochemical staining. The current role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the staging of breast cancer and ongoing controversies relating to the procedure are discussed.

The effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on mortality differs according to primary tumor location in women with node-positive breast cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic significance of primary tumor location and to examine whether the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on survival varies according to tumor location in women with axillary node-positive (ALN+) breast cancer (BC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were abstracted from the SEER database for 24,410 women aged 25-95 years, diagnosed between 1988-1997 with nonmetastatic T1-T2, ALN+ BC. Subgroup analyses were performed using interactions within proportional hazards models. Event was defined as death from any cause. Prognostic variables were selected using Akaike Information Criteria. Joint significances of subgroups were evaluated with Wald test.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 10 years. In joint models, statistically significant interactions were found between tumor location, nodal involvement, type of surgery, and radiotherapy. Factorial presentation of interactions showed consistent 13% proportional reduction of mortality in all subgroups, except in women with medial tumors with > or = 4 ALN+ treated with mastectomy. In this subgroup, use of radiotherapy was associated with a 16% proportional increase in mortality.

CONCLUSION

Medial tumor location is a significant adverse prognostic factor that should be considered in treatment decision- making for women with ALN+ BC. Improved survival was observed with radiotherapy use in all subgroups, except in women with medial tumors with > or = 4 ALN+ treated with postmastectomy radiotherapy. These findings raise concern that the favorable effect of radiotherapy may be offset by excess toxicities in the latter subgroup.

Chest wall resection for internal mammary lymph node metastases of breast cancer

Evaluation of morbidity, mortality and oncologic outcome of patients treated with a chest wall resection for isolated breast cancer recurrences in the Internal Mammary Chain. Retrospectively we retrieved data from 29 patients. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors for (disease-free) survival. There were no postoperative deaths. Complications occurred in 11 patients. The median follow-up after CWR for all 16 patients still alive at the end of this study is 18.4 months. Nine patients were free of cancer. The 3-year overall and disease-free survival is 59.2% and 8.6%. The median survival is 40.7 months. After multivariate analysis for each of the four endpoints studied, only one prognostic factor remains significant for survival: systemic therapy before CRW (p=0.004). For local recurrence-free survival a first CRW recurrence (p<0.00001) and for disease-free survival radicality of the resection (p=0.008) are independent prognostic factors. Chest wall resection is a safe and effective treatment for isolated breast cancer recurrences in the IMC. Surgically treated patients have a fair survival and some of them are even cured.

Minimal access breast surgery: a single breast incision for breast conservation surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy

AIMS

Minimal access breast surgery (MABS) is a procedure that completes breast conservation surgery (BCS) and sentinel node biopsy (SNB) through a single incision. It allows access to axillary sentinel nodes via the breast incision and also provides access to the internal mammary nodes (IMN) as well as other nodal sites when needed. The aims of this study are to describe the MABS approach and to evaluate its safety and efficacy in cases undergoing BCS and SNB (axillary or IMN) for treatment of breast cancer.

METHODS

The surgical technique for MABS is described. One hundred and three consecutive clinically lymph node negative patients undergoing BCS and SNB (axillary or IMN) were considered for MABS. Cases were classified according to the location of sentinel nodes dissected (axillary, internal mammary or other), the location of the tumour and whether MABS was used. The success of MABS was calculated based on the number of cases where BCS and SNB were completed through a single breast incision. Number of lymph nodes (LN) retrieved, rate of LN positivity, aesthetics and complications were documented.

RESULTS

Eighty-six percent of cases of BCS with axillary-only SNB were completed with MABS. For cases of BCS with axillary and IMN SNB, MABS was successful for BCS and IMN SNB in 97% of cases and for BCS and SNB from both nodal regions in 63%. There was only one case, a woman with breast prostheses, who required three separate incisions. When axillary-only SNB cases were completed with MABS, an average of 2.9 axillary LN per case with a 29% axillary LN positivity rate was seen. When axillary and IMN SNB were completed with MABS for both regions, an average of 3.0 axillary LN per case were retrieved with an axillary LN positivity rate of 65%. When separate axillary and breast incisions were made, 2.7 LN per case were removed with an axillary LN positivity rate of 30%. Aesthetics were excellent and there were no complications associated with reaching the nodes through the breast incision.

CONCLUSION

MABS is a feasible option for the majority of women undergoing BCS and SNB and it does not compromise the success of SNB.

Clinically node-negative breast cancer, internal mammary lymph nodes, and sentinel lymph node biopsy

We report 2 cases demonstrating that localization of internal mammary (IM) sentinel lymph nodes with lymphoscintigraphy using peritumoral injection of Tc-99m antimony sulfide colloid, followed by resection using minimal access surgery, can reveal nodal metastatic disease in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer when axillary sentinel nodes are not affected by metastatic disease. When this is found, it changes staging and can affect prognosis and treatment. These cases confirm that the technique used is sampling true sentinel IM nodes, that is nodes that receive direct lymph flow from the breast cancer, and confirm the importance of sampling IM sentinel lymph nodes. Unless techniques are used that are specifically designed to identify IM node drainage from the breast cancer site itself, with subsequent directed surgical removal of sentinel IM nodes, some patients with breast cancer will not be staged correctly.

Should internal mammary chain (IMC) sentinel node biopsy be performed?

INTRODUCTION

Although the status of the regional lymph nodes is an important determinant of prognosis in breast cancer, harvesting sentinel nodes (SN) detected in the internal mammary chain (IMC) is still controversial.

AIMS

To determine in how many patients a positive IMC-SN might change the systemic or locoregional adjuvant therapy, with a possible benefit in outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During 6 1/2 years data of T1-2 breast cancer patients, having an SN procedure, were prospectively collected. Our policy was not to explore the IMC even if it was the only localization of an SN.

RESULTS

In 86 of 571 patients lymphoscintigraphy showed an IMC-SN. In 64 of these, the axillary SN was negative and only 25 of these patients did not have an indication for adjuvant systemic treatment based on their tumor characteristics. In the literature, IMC metastases are found in 0-10% of axillary negative patients. Routine IMC-SN biopsies would have resulted in an indication for adjuvant systemic therapy in 2-3 of our patients. Four parasternal recurrences were found during a median follow-up of 51 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Harvesting IMC-SNs is a procedure of which only a limited number of patients have therapeutical benefit. Even with a thorough selection of patients, the extra morbidity of the procedure should be weighed against the potential benefit for the patient.

Management of the axilla in women with breast cancer: current clinical practice and a new selective targeted approach

BACKGROUND

Axillary nodal status is the most important prognostic factor for patients with breast cancer. Clinical assessment and imaging modalities are not always reliable. Surgical removal and histopathological examination of axillary lymph nodes remain essential methods of staging the axilla. However, the optimal management of the axilla remains uncertain.

METHODS

We performed Medline searches to identify relevant systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and nonrandomized and randomized controlled trials for the past 5 years (up to December 2007), as well as important historical articles and clinical guidelines relating to management of the axilla in women with breast cancer.

RESULTS

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has been the standard surgical approach for many years. It is, however, associated with marked morbidity; survival benefit remains uncertain. Axillary node sampling, widely practiced in the United Kingdom, is a reliable alternative procedure in staging the axilla, with less morbidity. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become an accurate method for staging the axilla in women with operable, clinically node-negative breast cancer. SLNB alone appears to be a safe and acceptable procedure for patients with uninvolved SLNs. Completion ALND or axillary radiotherapy remains the standard treatment for patients with tumor-involved SLNs. SLNB is associated with less morbidity than ALND. However, long-term follow-up and therapeutic outcomes are being awaited from randomized controlled trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Several procedures are available for staging and treating the axilla. A tailored surgical approach, with careful assessment of risk-benefit and patient preference, is guiding the evolving modern management of the axilla for women with breast cancer.

Internal mammary nodal chain drainage is a prognostic indicator in axillary node-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Internal mammary (IM) nodes are a potential site of breast lymphatic drainage. We examined the relationship between lymphoscintigraphic evidence of IM drainage and survival in early-stage breast cancer patients (pts).

METHODS

From a prospective database of 855 consecutive sentinel node mapping procedures using peritumoral radiocolloid injection from 1996-2004, we analyzed the 604 cases with stage I-III breast cancer. Overall survival and recurrence-free survival (OS, RFS) rates were compared in pts with (IM+) and without (IM-) IM drainage on lymphoscintigraphy using Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

100 of 604 pts (17%) showed IM drainage. Five-year OS and RFS were 92% vs 88% and 88% vs 85% in IM- vs IM+ pts. In the 186 pts with axillary metastases (node+), 5-year OS and RFS were 91% vs 71% and 84% vs 69% in IM- vs IM+ pts. Univariate analysis of node+ pts estimated increased mortality risk for IM+ (hazard ratio, HR 2.9, P = .04), >or=4 positive nodes (HR 3.2, P = .02), tumors that were ER-negative (HR 3.4, P = .02), or had high Ki-67 (HR 6.8, P = .01). Multivariate analysis estimated similar increased risks [>or=4 nodes (HR 4.0, P = .02), IM+ (HR 3.3, P = .06), and ER negativity (HR 2.6, P = .09)].

CONCLUSIONS

IM nodal drainage predicted a nearly 3-fold increased mortality risk in node+ pts. Peritumoral radiocolloid injection provides a clinically relevant assessment of IM drainage and should be prospectively tested for its value in tailoring treatment strategies for axillary node-positive pts.

Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy predicts the successful identification but is not necessary in sentinel lymph nodes biopsy in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Although preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for breast cancer patients is undergone commonly, its clinical significance remains controversial.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed our database that contained 636 consecutive breast cancer patients who received preoperative lymphoscintigraphy before SLNB.

RESULTS

The sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) of 86.5% of patients were well imaged by lymphoscintigraphy, and SLN were located extra-axilla in 5.3% patients. The visualization of SLN in lymphoscintigraphy was not associated with histopathologic type, location, and stage of primary tumor, as well as the time interval from injection of radiocolloid to surgery. The negative lymphoscintigraphy results were associated with excision ;biopsy before injection of radiocolloid and positive axillary node statues. The SLN was successfully detected in 625 (98.3%) enrolled patients. Failure of surgical identification of axillary SLN was associated with whether hot spot was imaged by lymphoscintigraphy. However, we identified axillary SLN in 90 (90.9%) out of 99 patients with negative axillary findings in lymphoscintigram. The false negative rate of SLNB in our study was 16.0% (15 of 94) among patients of training group, and there was no significant difference in the false negative rate between patients who had axillary hot spot in lymphoscintigram and those who had not (P = .273).

CONCLUSIONS

Visualization of SLN in preoperative lymphoscintigraphy predicted the successful SLN identification. However, it was less informative for the location of SLN during operation. Considering the complexity, time consumed, and cost, lymphoscintigraphy should at present be undergone for investigation purposes only.

Use of Radiotracer for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Breast Cancer Optimizes Staging Independent of Site of Administration

PURPOSE

In an effort to optimize sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping for breast cancer, sites of mapping agent administration and types of mapping agents used continue to be evaluated. This study compares SLN mapping using peritumoral (PT) or subareolar (SA) injection of radiolabeled colloid and examines the relative contributions of radiotracer and blue dye to SLN identification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 456 patients with breast cancer and clinically negative axillae who underwent SLN mapping. Sequential groups of patients were injected with filtered Tc-99m SC, 326 peritumorally (group 1) and 130 subareolarly (group 2). All patients had intraoperative SA injection of 1% isosulfan blue dye.

RESULTS

The SLN identification and isotope success rates were 97% and 96% in group 1 and 98% and 98% in group 2, respectively. Eighty-one patients (25%) in group 1 and 44 patients (34%) in group 2 had positive SLNs. Of these patients, 15% from group 1 and 14% from group 2 had only positive nodes detected by radiotracer, and 9 of these patients (6 from group 1 and 3 from group 2) had other nodes identified by both radiotracer and blue dye that were negative for metastases. Six percent of patients with positive SLNs were upstaged because of use of radiotracer.

CONCLUSIONS

PT and SA injection of radiotracer have comparable success rates for axillary SLN identification. Given that 15% of patients in group 1 and 14% in group 2 had only positive SLNs detected by radiotracer, independent of site of administration, radiotracer remains essential for optimizing breast SLN mapping.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer: Current Controversies

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has replaced the routine level I and II axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for women with clinically node-negative T1 and T2 breast cancer. Studies have shown that SLNB is highly predictive of axillary nodal status with a false-negative of rate less than 10%. Our purpose was to address some of the ongoing controversies about this procedure, including technical issues, use of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, internal mammary lymph node biopsy, criteria for patient selection (in intraductal carcinoma?), its staging accuracy, and the clinical approach when a SLNB was found to be negative or positive on pathologic examination. After the revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for breast cancer in 2002, the evaluation of internal mammary lymph nodes and determination of micrometastases by hematoxylin-eosin or by immunohistochemistry have become increasingly important in staging of patients. Recent guideline recommendations developed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Expert Panel in 2005 are also discussed. Long-term follow-up results of ongoing studies will provide more accurate assessment of the prognostic significance of SLNB and its value in the prevention of breast cancer-related morbidity in axillary staging compared to ALND.

Lymphoscintigraphy Does Not Enhance Sentinel Node Identification or Alter Management of Patients With Early Breast Cancer

Lymphoscintigraphy (LS) is often performed before sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) for breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine whether routine LS enhances rate of identification of sentinel nodes (SN), and if findings on LS alter either the SLND procedure or the subsequent patient management.

METHODS

LS using technetium-99m sulfur colloid (99mTc) was performed in 136 consecutive patients undergoing SLND for invasive breast cancer. Three equal aliquots of 99mTc were injected peritumorally, and LS images were obtained at 60 to 120 min after 99mTc injection. Data were collected on the success of LS to visualize SN. Information regarding body mass index (BMI), biopsy type (core vs excisional), tumor location (medial vs lateral), and SN positivity were recorded and comparison was made with success of operative SN identification. In all SLND cases, 1% lymphazurin blue dye was used in addition to the 99mTc.

RESULTS

LS failed to identify an SN in 9 of 136 cases (6.6%). Failed mappings did not correlate with biopsy type, tumor location, or SN positivity. There was a positive correlation between increased BMI and failed LS (p = <0.001). Failed LS did not predict operative SLND failure, as an SN was identified in 100% of cases (136/136), including the 9 with a failed LS. In 67% (6/9) of the failed LS, the SN was both hot and blue at operation. Internal mammary (IM) drainage was observed in 4% (6/136) of LS. Positive SN were found in 26% (35/136) of patients. Findings on LS did not affect adjuvant treatment decisions in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a correlation between failed LS and BMI, but no correlation with biopsy type or tumor location. Drainage to extraaxillary sites was rare. LS findings did not enhance success of intraoperative identification of SN or alter the postoperative management of patients with early stage breast cancer.

Does imaging in sentinel node scintigraphic localization add value to the procedure in patients with breast cancer?

Imaging sentinel nodes with pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy effectively assures successful sentinel node identification. However, sentinel nodes are still identified in the majority of image negative patients. Given the logistics and cost required to perform pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy its routine use may not be justified. It may be valuable for surgeons in the learning phase and in obese patients who have increased risk of intra-operative failed localization. A negative pre-operative lymphoscintiscan predicts inability to localize with the hand-held gamma probe. Patients with no 'hot node' on the lymphoscintiscan are more likely to have failed localization using the gamma probe only. Therefore, blue dye should be used along with the gamma probe to optimize the localization rate in these patients.

Extra-axillary sentinel node biopsy in the management of early breast cancer

AIM

To document of our experience with EAS SNB and evaluate its impact on the staging, management and the associated morbidities of patients with early breast cancer.

METHOD

A review of two prospective breast cancer databases identifying all SNB procedures performed at two affiliated breast units from 1998 to 2003.

RESULTS

A series of 979 patients underwent lymphatic mapping. Sentinel nodes were successfully identified in 903 patients. There were 142 cases in which lymphoscintigraphy identified EAS. In 17 cases extraaxillary sentinel nodes were identified with lymphoscintigraphy but could not be removed. There were 138 cases where internal mammary nodes (IMN) were removed. Of those IMN removed 25 were positive for metastases and in six of these cases only the IMN was positive. Of the 21 cases where other EAS were identified there was one case in which a supraclavicular sentinel node was positive. Twenty-five of the 26 positive sentinel nodes in EAS were macrometastases and one was a micrometastasis. No significant morbidity resulted from biopsy of EAS SNB. During IMN SNB there were eight pleural breeches, which did not result in pneumothoraces, and one case in which bleeding was difficult to control.

CONCLUSION

EAS SNB is technically feasible in the majority of cases. Minimal morbidity occurs after an initial learning phase. IMN SNB was shown to have significant impact on the staging and management in 18% of patients when IMNs were identified with lymphoscintigraphy. The impact of other extraaxillary lymph nodes is more difficult to assess due to small numbers. As there is little morbidity and valuable information is gained in a significant percentage of cases we strongly advocate EAS SNB.

American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer

PURPOSE

To develop a guideline for the use of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in early stage breast cancer.

METHODS

An American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Expert Panel conducted a systematic review of the literature available through February 2004 on the use of SNB in early-stage breast cancer. The panel developed a guideline for clinicians and patients regarding the appropriate use of a sentinel lymph node identification and sampling procedure from hereon referred to as SNB. The guideline was reviewed by selected experts in the field and the ASCO Health Services Committee and was approved by the ASCO Board of Directors.

RESULTS

The literature review identified one published prospective randomized controlled trial in which SNB was compared with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), four limited meta-analyses, and 69 published single-institution and multicenter trials in which the test performance of SNB was evaluated with respect to the results of ALND (completion axillary dissection). There are currently no data on the effect of SLN biopsy on long-term survival of patients with breast cancer. However, a review of the available evidence demonstrates that, when performed by experienced clinicians, SNB appears to be a safe and acceptably accurate method for identifying early-stage breast cancer without involvement of the axillary lymph nodes.

CONCLUSION

SNB is an appropriate initial alternative to routine staging ALND for patients with early-stage breast cancer with clinically negative axillary nodes. Completion ALND remains standard treatment for patients with axillary metastases identified on SNB. Appropriately identified patients with negative results of SNB, when done under the direction of an experienced surgeon, need not have completion ALND. Isolated cancer cells detected by pathologic examination of the SLN with use of specialized techniques are currently of unknown clinical significance. Although such specialized techniques are often used, they are not a required part of SLN evaluation for breast cancer at this time. Data suggest that SNB is associated with less morbidity than ALND, but the comparative effects of these two approaches on tumor recurrence or patient survival are unknown.

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with large breast cancers

BACKGROUND

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy (LM/SL) accurately evaluates the axilla in patients with small breast cancers. LM/SL in patients with large breast cancers is controversial. We examined the accuracy of LM/SL prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with large (>3.5 cm) breast cancers.

METHODS

Patients with large breast cancers underwent LM/SL prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using 99m-technetium radiocolloid and isosulfan-blue dye technique.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with large (median 5.0 cm) breast cancers underwent LM/SL prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Twelve patients had a tumor-free sentinel node (SN) and received doxorubicin-based chemotherapy; 9 patients had disease in the SN and received doxorubicin followed by a taxane. No patient progressed while receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, nor has there been an axillary recurrence (median 36 months).

CONCLUSIONS

LM/SL performed prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with large breast cancers is an accurate method of axillary staging. Axillary staging prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy may have prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Lower and central tumor location correlates with lymphoscintigraphy drainage to the internal mammary lymph nodes in breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Radiation to the internal mammary chain (IMC) may be indicated for breast carcinoma patients with positive axillary sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and lymphoscintigraphic evidence of drainage to the IMC. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of IMC drainage in patients with positive axillary SLNs.

METHODS

The records of 297 breast carcinoma patients with positive axillary SLNs and preoperative lymphoscintigraphy were reviewed between 1995 and 2002. Radiolabeled colloid was injected peritumorally with lymphoscintigraphy performed 30-60 minutes later. Drainage to the regional nodes of 279 patients was seen on lymphoscintigraphy. Associations among patient and tumor-related factors and drainage to the IMC were examined.

RESULTS

Drainage to the IMC on lymphoscintigraphy was seen in 63 patients (21%). IMC drainage only occurred in 4 patients, and 59 patients had both axillary and IMC drainage. The only variable that correlated with IMC drainage was tumor location (P = 0.017). Rates of drainage to the IMC were 14.1% for upper outer quadrant (n = 128), 16.7% for upper inner quadrant (n = 30), 31.6% for lower outer quadrant (n = 19), 42.9% for lower inner quadrant (n = 14), and 28.4% for central tumors (n = 88). IMC drainage rates differed significantly between upper and lower tumors (lower 36.4% vs. central 28.4% vs. upper 14.6%, P = 0.003) but not between medial and lateral tumors (medial 25.0% vs. central 28.4% vs. lateral 16.3%, P = 0.077).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with tumors in the lower or central breast and positive axillary SLNs have increased incidence of drainage to the IMC. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy can help to define the nodal basins at risk for harboring disease.

Revision of breast cancer staging: the 6th edition of the TNM Classification

A Breast Task Force comprised of nationally known experts in the field of breast cancer treatment was charged with recommending additions and changes for the 6th edition of the TNM Classification that were based on published evidence and/or were consistent with widespread clinical consensus. Additions made to the staging system were designed to facilitate the uniform collection of clinically relevant information about new techniques for the detection of metastatic cells. These additions include quantitative criteria to distinguish micrometastases from isolated tumor cells, and specific identifiers to record the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy, immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, and molecular biology techniques. Revisions of the previous staging system are related to the number of affected axillary lymph nodes and to the classification of level III axillary lymph nodes and lymph nodes outside of the axilla.

Prospective multicenter study of axillary nodal staging by positron emission tomography in breast cancer: a report of the staging breast cancer with PET Study Group

PURPOSE

To determine the accuracy of positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-labeled 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG-PET) in detecting axillary nodal metastases in women with primary breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective multicenter study, 360 women with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer underwent FDG-PET. Images were blindly interpreted by three experienced readers for abnormally increased axillary FDG uptake. Imaging results from 308 assessable axillae were compared with axillary node pathology.

RESULTS

For detecting axillary nodal metastasis, the mean estimated area under the receiver operator curve for the three readers was 0.74 (range, 0.70 to 0.76). If at least one probably or definitely abnormal axillary focus was considered positive, the mean (and range) sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for PET were 61% (54% to 67%), 80% (79% to 81%), 62% (60% to 64%), and 79% (76% to 81%), respectively. False-negative axillae on PET had significantly smaller and fewer tumor-positive lymph nodes (2.7) than true-positive axillae (5.1; P <.005). Semiquantitative analysis of axillary FDG uptake showed that a nodal standardized uptake value (lean body mass) more than 1.8 had a positive predictive value of 90%, but a sensitivity of only 32%. Finding two or more intense foci of tracer uptake in the axilla was highly predictive of axillary metastasis (78% to 83% positive predictive value), albeit insensitive (27%).

CONCLUSION

FDG-PET has moderate accuracy for detecting axillary metastasis but often fails to detect axillae with small and few nodal metastases. Although highly predictive for nodal tumor involvement when multiple intense foci of tracer uptake are identified, FDG-PET is not routinely recommended for axillary staging of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Clinical relevance of parasternal uptake in sentinel node procedure for breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy contributes highly to the accuracy of the sentinel node procedure. Besides routing towards the axilla, in a number of patients additional parasternal focal accumulation may be observed. So far the clinical consequences of this parasternal uptake remains unclarified, i.e., whether any internal mammary lymph node uptake should be surgically biopsied. An analysis of all sentinel node procedures with parasternal uptake was performed.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients with scintigraphic parasternal uptake and with a minimal follow-up of 24 months, were selected from a prospective database. Tumor characteristics, treatment strategies, and recurrences of these patients were analyzed and subsequently matched against the present day indications for adjuvant treatment.

RESULTS

During follow-up (median 41 months) only four (6%) patients developed systemic disease. Initially, three of these patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Two are alive without evidence of disease after treatment of these recurrences. Currently these patients would, initially, all have been eligible for chemotherapy based on tumor characteristics and age according to international guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

For the indication of adjuvant treatment, the status of the internal mammary lymph nodes was not relevant in our patients. Parasternal uptake is not an indication to extend the surgical procedure.

Staging system for breast cancer: revisions for the 6th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual

Since its inception, the AJCC staging system for breast cancer has been in an almost constant state of evolution, striving with each revision to reflect the most up-to-date clinical research as well as the widespread consensus among physicians about appropriate diagnostic and treatment standards. To date, these revisions have essentially represented a "fine-tuning" of the initial judgment that tumor size, lymph node status, and presence of distant metastases are the most significant prognostic factors for breast cancer. With the problems of standardization and reproducibility being resolved, it is likely that histologic grade will join this group of independent markers and be incorporated into the AJCC staging system in the near future. Over the last 15 years. considerable attention has been focused on the discovery of new markers visualized with immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR that may be validated as independent prognostic indicators (reviewed by Mirza et al). To date, the usefulness of many of these markers has been limited by lack of standardization in measurement techniques, but several show great promise for the future. By increasing the number of prognostic markers that can give independent information about patient outcome, physicians will be better able to determine optimal treatment approaches for individual patients.

Mammographic and clinical predictors of drainage patterns in breast lymphoscintigrams obtained during sentinel node procedures

PURPOSE

The authors' purpose was to explore the association between mammographic findings and drainage patterns on lymphoscintigrams obtained during sentinel node procedures for breast carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From July 1997 to March 2000, 132 patients with breast cancer who were included in a prospective mammography-pathology correlation and staging database were imaged 2 hours after perilesional injection of 1 mCi filtered (0. 22 microm) Tc-99m sulfur colloid (4 ml volume) before sentinel node procedures.

RESULTS

Sixty-four percent of the scans showed axillary drainage only, 9% showed axillary and internal mammary drainage, and 4% revealed internal mammary drainage only. Twenty-three percent of scans showed no drainage. Of the patients who showed drainage, 17% showed drainage to the internal mammary basin, and 5% showed this exclusively. Internal mammary drainage was seen in 18% (10 of 57) of lateral, 21% (6 of 29) of medial, and 14% (1 of 7) of subareolar lesions (P = NS). No drainage was seen in 22% of patients with predominantly fatty mammographic parenchymal density (>50%) compared with only 8% of patients with predominantly dense (>50%) parenchyma (P < 0.05). Failure to show drainage was more common in women older than 50 years (P < 0.05). Axillary sentinel nodes were identified surgically in 73% of patients with negative scan findings. There was no significant association between scintigraphic drainage and mammographic soft tissue tumor size and appearance, histologic findings, or axillary node status.

CONCLUSIONS

Dense mammographic parenchyma and age less than 50 years are associated with identification of lymphatic drainage on lymphoscintigrams performed before sentinel node procedures in 91% to 92% of patients. Internal mammary drainage, present in 18% of lateral and 21% of medial lesions, may direct therapy to include internal mammary lymph nodes.

Cytokeratin staining and other sentinel node controversies

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for breast cancer staging has been widely accepted because it is more sensitive and less morbid than axillary dissection. Sentinel nodes can be thoroughly scrutinized using a variety of techniques increasing the detection of micrometastases; however, the clinical relevance of micrometastases has been challenged. The available data suggest that the prognostic significance of axillary metastases is related to the size of the metastases, and the best data suggest that outcome for patients with metastases < 0.2 mm is similar to patients with node-negative disease. This would argue against the use of ultrasensitive tests such as reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Immunohistochemistry upstages 2%-20% of hematoxylin and eosin-negative sentinel nodes, and additional nodal metastases are identified in approximately 10% of completion axillary dissections prompted by an immunohistochemistry (IHC)-positive sentinel node. This would appear to be a good reason to perform IHC and act on the results. Because micrometastases can be artifactual, SLN biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ can lead to harmful overtreatment and is best performed in the context of clinical trials. Lymphoscintigraphy has allowed the detection of alternate drainage patterns to internal mammary, infraclavicular, and supraclavicular lymph nodes. Although patients are occasionally identified who have metastases to these basins but not the axilla, this information will not impact the decision for chemotherapy in most cases. Internal mammary SLN biopsy may have value in patients with tumors < 1 cm, but requires additional evaluation in clinical trials.

Lymphoscintigraphic visualization of internal mammary nodes with subtumoral injection of radiocolloid in patients with breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether subtumoral injection of radiocolloid is useful for lymphoscintigraphic visualization of the internal mammary node and in sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy of the axilla in breast cancer patients.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The presence of retromammary lymphatics connecting to the axillary and internal mammary basins has been demonstrated by early anatomic studies. Thus, it is hypothesized that some lymph, especially that from the parenchyma under the tumor, may drain into both the axillary and internal mammary basins.

METHODS

Patients (n = 196) with T1-2, N0 breast cancer underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with radiocolloid (technetium 99m tin colloid) injection into various sites of the breast, followed by SLN biopsy using the combined method with blue dye. Patients were divided into four groups: group A (n = 41), peritumoral injection of both radiocolloid and blue dye; group B (n = 70), periareolar radiocolloid and peritumoral blue dye; group C (n = 45), intradermal radiocolloid and periareolar blue dye; and group D (n = 40), subtumoral radiocolloid and intradermal blue dye. A retrospective analysis of 1,297 breast cancer patients who underwent extended radical mastectomy with internal mammary node dissection was also conducted to determine the relationship between vertical tumor location (superficial or deep) and frequency of axillary and internal mammary node metastases.

RESULTS

One patient (2%) in group A, 3 (4%) in group B, 0 (0%) in group C, and 15 (38%) in group D exhibited hot spots in the internal mammary region on lymphoscintigraphy (P <.001, group D vs. the other groups). The concordance rate of radiocolloid and blue dye methods in detection of SLNs in the axillary basin was significantly lower in group D than in the other groups. In contrast, the mismatch rate (some SLNs were identified by radiocolloid and other SLNs were identified by blue dye, but no SLN was identified by both in the same patient) was significantly higher in group D than in the other groups. In patients treated with extended radical mastectomy, positivity of axillary and internal mammary metastases was significantly higher in patients (n = 215) with deep tumors than those (n = 368) with superficial tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest the presence of a retromammary lymphatic pathway from the deep portion of the breast to both axillary and internal mammary basins, which is distinct from the superficial pathway. Therefore, SLN biopsy with a combination of subtumoral and other (peritumoral, dermal, or areolar) injections of radiocolloid will improve both axillary and internal mammary nodal staging.