Causes for the undertreatment of elderly breast cancer patients: tailoring treatments to individual patients

Concordance of ChatGPT artificial intelligence decision-making in colorectal cancer multidisciplinary meetings: retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the concordance between therapeutic recommendations proposed by a multidisciplinary team meeting and those generated by a large language model (ChatGPT) for colorectal cancer. Although multidisciplinary teams represent the 'standard' for decision-making in cancer treatment, they require significant resources and may be susceptible to human bias. Artificial intelligence, particularly large language models such as ChatGPT, has the potential to enhance or optimize the decision-making processes. The present study examines the potential for integrating artificial intelligence into clinical practice by comparing multidisciplinary team decisions with those generated by ChatGPT.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-centre study was conducted involving consecutive patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer discussed at our multidisciplinary team meeting. The pre- and post-therapeutic multidisciplinary team meeting recommendations were assessed for concordance compared with ChatGPT-4.

RESULTS

One hundred consecutive patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer of all stages were included. In the pretherapeutic discussions, complete concordance was observed in 72.5%, with partial concordance in 10.2% and discordance in 17.3%. For post-therapeutic discussions, the concordance increased to 82.8%; 11.8% of decisions displayed partial concordance and 5.4% demonstrated discordance. Discordance was more frequent in patients older than 77 years and with an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification ≥ III.

CONCLUSION

There is substantial concordance between the recommendations generated by ChatGPT and those provided by traditional multidisciplinary team meetings, indicating the potential utility of artificial intelligence in supporting clinical decision-making for colorectal cancer management.

Concordance between patient-reported and physician-documented comorbidities and symptoms among Stage 4 breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Comorbidities and symptoms in metastatic breast cancer patients impact treatment decisions and influence prognosis and quality of life. The objective of this study is to examine the concordance between physician documentation and patient reports of comorbidities and symptoms to understand their comparative effectiveness.

METHODS

New patients with metastatic breast cancer completed an electronic intake survey assessing patient health history and symptoms. Physician documentation across 54 comorbidities and 42 symptoms was abstracted from notes for the corresponding clinic visits between November 2016 and March 2020. Concordance between patient reports and medical records for each condition and hazards ratios for each patient versus physician reported comorbidity and symptom were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients were included in the analysis (age, median = 56 years, range = 29-86 years; 131 white [78.9%]). Twenty-three of 54 comorbidities had a moderate to high level of agreement between patients and physicians (κ ≥ 0.40). Physicians documented higher numbers of comorbidities that can be objectively measured which also had higher concordance (e.g., diabetes [κ = 0.83] and hypertension [κ = 0.79]) while patients reported higher numbers of comorbidities that are more subjective which also had lower concordance (anxiety [κ = 0.30], GERD [κ = 0.36]). One physician-documented and two patient-reported comorbidities were significantly associated with survival (p < 0.05). Only 2 of 42 symptoms had a moderate to high level of agreement between patients and physicians. One physician-documented and nine patient-reported symptoms were significantly associated with decreased survival (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Agreement between patients' and physicians' reporting of comorbidities varies substantially, and patient reports can complement physician documentation. Physicians significantly underreported symptoms versus patients; thus, concordance was also low. Multiple patient-reported symptoms were predictive of survival; thus, incorporating them can provide more informative estimates of predicted survival.

Low Rates of Medical Oncology Consultation for Older Women (≥ 70 Years) with Newly Diagnosed, Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Curative intent cancer treatment needs to be balanced with patient comorbidities and quality of life when treating older women with breast cancer. We examined consultation patterns and association of age at diagnosis with lack of specialist cancer consultations for older women with breast cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of older women (≥ 70 years of age) with incident, non-metastatic breast cancer (2010-2018) by linking administrative databases in Ontario, Canada. The outcomes of interest were lack of specialist cancer consultation (surgeon, medical oncology, or radiation oncology) within 12 months of diagnosis. Association of age with lack of specialist cancer consultation was examined using Poisson regression modeling.

RESULTS

Of 21,849 older women, 2.4% (n = 517) did not have any specialist cancer consultation within 12 months of diagnosis; lack of any specialist cancer consultation increased with age (0.8% for age 70-74 years, 1.3% for age 75-79 years, 2.5% for age 80-84 years, and 7.0% for age ≥ 85 years; p < 0.001). The proportion of patients who did not have consultations with surgeons, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists was 8.6% (n = 1888), 34.4% (n = 7510), and 24.7% (n = 5404), respectively. Older age group was independently associated with an increased likelihood of lacking any specialist consultation, as well as not receiving surgical and medical oncology consultations.

CONCLUSION

More than one-third of women ≥ 70 years of age with non-metastatic breast cancer did not have a consultation with a medical oncologist, with women aged ≥ 85 years least likely to have a medical oncology consultation.

A scoping review of ageism towards older adults in cancer care

INTRODUCTION

Ageism towards older adults with cancer may impact treatment decisions, healthcare interactions, and shape health/psychosocial outcomes. The purpose of this review is twofold: (1) To synthesize the literature on ageism towards older adults with cancer in oncology and (2) To identify interventions that address ageism in the healthcare context applicable to oncology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a scoping review following Arksey and O'Malley and Levac methods and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We conducted an exhaustive multi-database search, screening 30,926 titles/abstracts. Following data abstraction, we conducted tabular, narrative, and textual synthesis.

RESULTS

We extracted data on 133 papers. Most (n = 44) were expert opinions, reviews, and letters to editors highlighting the negative impacts of ageism, expressing the need for approaches addressing heterogeneity of older adults, and calling for increased clinical trial inclusion for older adults. Qualitative studies (n = 3) described healthcare professionals' perceived influence of age on treatment recommendations, whereas quantitative studies (n = 32) were inconclusive as to whether age-related bias impacted treatment recommendations/outcomes or survival. Intervention studies (n = 54) targeted ageism in pre/post-licensure healthcare professionals and reported participants' improvement in knowledge and/or attitudes towards older adults. No interventions were found that had been implemented in oncology.

DISCUSSION

Concerns relating to ageism in cancer care are consistently described in the literature. Interventions exist to address ageism; however, none have been developed or tested in oncology settings. Addressing ageism in oncology will require integration of geriatric knowledge/interventions to address conscious and unconscious ageist attitudes impacting care and outcomes. Interventions hold promise if tailored for cancer care settings. 249/250.

Why do Older Women Avoid Breast Cancer Surgery? A Qualitative Analysis of Decision-making Factors

BACKGROUND

Few studies have explored why older women (≥70 years old) avoid breast cancer surgery. This study aimed to identify physician- and patient-perceived attitudes that influence the decision to avoid surgery among older women with invasive breast cancer.

METHODS

Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with multidisciplinary breast cancer specialists and older women (≥70 years old) with breast cancer who declined surgery. Transcripts were iteratively coded using a theoretical framework to guide identification of common themes. Thematic comparison was performed between patients and physicians.

RESULTS

Ten breast cancer specialists and eleven patients participated. Physicians believed older women declined surgery because they did not perceive breast cancer as a life-threatening ailment compared to other medical comorbidities. Physicians did not discuss breast reconstruction, as it was perceived to be unimportant. Treatment side effects, length of treatment, impact on quality of life, and minimal survival benefit strongly influenced patients' decision to decline surgery. Patients valued independence and quality of life over quantity of life. Patients felt empowered to participate in the decision-making process but appreciated having support. Both phyisicians and patients had congruent beliefs with respect to age impacting treatment decision, cosmesis playing a minor factor in treatment decisions, and importance of quality of life; however, they were discordant in their perceptions about the amount of support that patients have from their families.

CONCLUSIONS

The decision to avoid surgery in older women stems from a variety of individual beliefs. Acknowledging patient values early in treatment planning may facilitate a patient-centered approach to the decision-making process.

Treatment Practices and Outcomes of Elderly Women with Breast Cancer in a Community Hospital

There is a paucity of clinical data available on specific treatment in the oncogeriatric population with breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment patterns and survival outcomes in the elderly to address any disparities at our community hospital. We retrospectively identified a total of 1749 patients diagnosed and treated for breast cancer at our institution between 2001 and 2011. Patient demographics, surgical treatment, stage of disease, tumor characteristics, adjuvant therapy, and 5-year survival data were obtained from tumor registry records. Comparisons between study groups were made using the Pearson χ2 test and Student's t test. We found more favorable prognostic makers among women older than 70 years of age. Of the women with lymph node-positive disease, 84 per cent of those younger than 70 years and 33 per cent in the older than 70 years of age study group received chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy were more frequently performed in the younger group. Overall 5-year survival was 90 per cent and 71 per cent for younger than 70 years and older than 70 years groups, respectively. Women older than 70 years of age have more favorable breast cancer characteristics compared with younger women and received less aggressive treatment and experienced a higher mortality rate. Prospective trials are needed to assess the impact of aggressive multimodality therapy in this oncogeriatric population.

Treatment of stage I-III rectal cancer: Who is refusing surgery?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Surgical resection is a cornerstone in the management of patients with rectal cancer. Patients may refuse surgical treatment for several reasons although the rate of refusal is currently unknown.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was utilized to identify patients with stage I-III rectal cancer. Patients who refused surgical resection were compared to patients who underwent curative resection.

RESULTS

A total of 509 (2.6%) patients with stage I and 2082 (3.5%) patients with stage II/III rectal cancer refused surgery. In multivariable analysis for stage I disease, older age, Black race, and Medicaid/no insurance were independent predictors of surgery refusal. Patients were less likely to refuse surgery if they had a higher income or lived further distances from the treatment facility. In multivariable analysis for stage II/III disease, older age, Black race, insurance other than private, and rural county were independent predictors of surgery refusal. Patients were less likely to refuse surgery if they had higher Charlson comorbidity scores, lived further distances from the treatment facility, or underwent chemoradiation. There was a significant decrease in survival for patients refusing surgery compared to patients undergoing recommended surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

A small proportion of patients refuse surgery for rectal cancer, and this treatment decision significantly affects survival.

The role of post-mastectomy radiotherapy in elderly patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes breast cancer: An International Retrospective Double-Center Study

This study evaluated the role of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in 111 patients with 1-3 positive nodes, aged 65 years or above between 2007 and 2013. In total, 64 received PMRT. The PMRT group had more aggressive tumor. Three patients suffered locoregional recurrences in each group at median follow-up of 50 months. PMRT has no significant impact on distant disease-free survival (DDRFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). In patients with tumors >5 cm, PMRT significantly improved DDRFS, RFS, and marginally prolonged OS. These results supported that PMRT should not be compromised in all elderly patients, especially in those with tumor >5 cm.

The rationale for and long-term outcome of incomplete axillary staging in elderly women with primary breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The proportion of elderly women diagnosed with breast cancer is rising. Standard treatment, including axillary staging, is often not given to these patients. This study aimed to investigate reasons to omit any surgical axillary staging or to refrain from completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) after positive-sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB); so-called "incomplete staging". Furthermore, the impact of incomplete staging on regional control and survival in patients aged 75 or older was evaluated.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all primary breast cancer patients aged 75 or older, diagnosed between 2001 and 2008, and documented by the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Patients with incomplete staging were compared to patients with complete axillary staging. Survival analyses were used to determine the risk of local, regional and distant recurrence and overall survival.

RESULTS

In total, 1467 of 2116 (69%) patients were considered eligible, of whom 258 (17.2%) had incomplete axillary staging. For 93 patients, diagnosed in 6 of the 10 hospitals in the NCR-area, examination of clinical records revealed that age, comorbidities and patient preferences were the main reason for omitting complete axillary staging. The 10-year axillary recurrence rate in these 93 patients was 5.2% (95% CI, 0.03-10.1). Of the 77 patients who had died, 64 (83%) died of non-breast-cancer-related causes. No significant difference in overall survival was observed between patients with or without complete axillary staging.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the omission of complete axillary staging is common in selected elderly breast cancer patients with ≥2 comorbidities, with no apparent impact on regional control and 10-year overall survival.

Consideration of comorbidity in treatment decision making in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Comorbidity is very common among patients with cancer. Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTs) are increasingly the context within which cancer treatment decisions are made internationally. Little is known about how comorbidity is considered, or impacts decisions, in MDTs.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate previous evidence on consideration, and impact, of comorbidity in cancer MDT treatment decision making. Twenty-one original studies were included.

RESULTS

Lack of information on comorbidity in MDTs impedes the ability of MDT members to make treatment recommendations, and for those recommendations to be implemented among patients with comorbidity. Where treatment is different from that recommended due to comorbidity, it is more conservative, despite evidence that such treatment may be tolerated and effective. MDT members are likely to be unaware of the extent to which issues such as comorbidity are ignored.

CONCLUSIONS

MDTs should systematically consider treatment of patients with comorbidity. Further research is needed to assist clinicians to undertake MDT decision making that appropriately addresses comorbidity. If this were to occur, it would likely contribute to improved outcomes for cancer patients with comorbidities.

A systematic review of factors influencing older adults' decision to accept or decline cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

Cancer is a disease that affects mostly older adults. Older adults often have other chronic health conditions in addition to cancer and may have different health priorities, both of which can impact cancer treatment decision-making. However, no systematic review of factors that influence an older cancer patient's decision to accept or decline cancer treatment has been conducted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic review of the literature published between inception of the databases and February 2013. Dutch, English, French or German articles reporting on qualitative studies, cross-sectional, longitudinal observational or intervention studies describing factors why older adults accepted or declined cancer treatment examining actual treatment decisions were included. Ten databases were used. Two independent reviewers reviewed manuscripts and performed data abstraction using a standardized form and the quality of studies was assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS

Of 17,343 abstracts reviewed, a total of 38 studies were included. The majority focused on breast and prostate cancer treatment decisions and most studies used a qualitative design. Important factors for accepting treatment were convenience and success rate of treatment, seeing necessity of treatment, trust in the physician and following the physician's recommendation. Factors important for declining cancer treatment included concerns about the discomfort of the treatments, fear of side effects and transportation difficulties.

CONCLUSION

Although the reasons why older adults with cancer accepted or declined treatment varied considerably, the most consistent determinant was physician recommendation. Further studies using large, representative samples and exploring decision-making incorporating health literacy and comorbidity are needed.

Characteristics, survival, and related factors of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients refusing cancer treatments under a universal health insurance program

Background

Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. Few studies have addressed the causes and risks of treatment refusal in a universal health insurance setting.

Methods

We examined the characteristics and survival associated with treatment refusal in patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer in Taiwan during 2004–2008. Treatment refusal was defined as not undergoing any cancer treatment within 4 months of confirmed cancer diagnosis. Patient data were extracted from four national databases. Factors associated with treatment refusal were identified through logistic regression using the generalized estimating equation method, and survival analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Of the 41,340 new colorectal cancer cases diagnosed, 3,612 patients (8.74%) refused treatment. Treatment refusal rate was higher in patients with less urbanized areas of residence, lower incomes, preexisting catastrophic illnesses, cancer stages of 0 and IV, and diagnoses at regional and district hospitals. Logistic regression analysis revealed that patients aged >75 years were the most likely to refuse treatment (OR, 1.87); patients with catastrophic illnesses (OR, 1.66) and stage IV cancer (OR, 1.43) had significantly higher refusal rates. The treatment refusers had 2.66 times the risk of death of those who received treatment. Factors associated with an increased risk of death in refusers included age ≥75 years, insured monthly salary ≥22,801 NTD, low-income household or aboriginal status, and advanced cancer stage (especially stage IV; HR, 11.33).

Conclusion

Our results show a lower 5-year survival for colorectal patients who refused treatment than for those who underwent treatment within 4 months. An age of 75 years or older, low-income household status, advanced stages of cancer, especially stage IV, were associated with higher risks of death for those who refused treatment.

Hormone receptor-negative breast cancer: undertreatment of patients over 80

PURPOSE

Patients older than 80 years represent a significant breast cancer population but are underrepresented in clinical trials. It is established that estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)-negative status confers a worse prognosis in patients under 70, but this is not well studied in those over 80. We examined the prognosis of patients over 80 with ER/PR-negative disease to determine whether these patients are more likely to die of breast cancer than cardiovascular disease and to study treatment patterns.

METHODS

We queried the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 1992 and 2009 for patients with invasive breast carcinoma. Primary outcomes were breast cancer or cardiovascular death; secondary outcomes were radiotherapy and surgery. Cox proportional hazard analysis and logistic regression were used to determine adjusted outcomes over time. Subset analysis was performed comparing mortality rates by stage.

RESULTS

There were 502,807 patients, 6,933 over 80 with ER/PR-negative disease. ER/PR-negative patients over 80 faced decreased 10-year survival compared to ER/PR-positive patients (61.5, 81.4 %; p < 0.05). ER/PR-negative patients were more likely to die of breast cancer than of cardiovascular disease (25.6, 12.2 %). Adjusting for confounders, ER/PR-negative patients over 80 were more likely to die from breast cancer specifically than patients aged 50-79 years [hazards ratio (HR) 1.53, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.43-1.64]. This finding was consistent across all stages. Compared to younger cohorts, elderly patients with ER/PR-negative disease received less radiotherapy [odds ratio (OR) 0.42, 95 % CI 0.39-0.46] and had a trend for less surgery (OR 0.86, 95 % CI 0.69-1.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly ER/PR-negative patients are more likely to die of their breast disease than cardiovascular disease. Standard treatment regimens, especially radiotherapy, should be considered for elderly patients.

Assessing the impact of a cooperative group trial on breast cancer care in the medicare population

PURPOSE

The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) C9343 trial found that adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) provided minimal benefits for older women with breast cancer. Although treatment guidelines were changed to indicate that some women could forego RT, the impact of the C9343 results on clinical practice is unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) -Medicare data set to assess the use of adjuvant RT in a sample of women ≥ 70 years old diagnosed with stage I breast cancer from 2001 to 2007 who fulfilled the C9343 inclusion criteria. We used log-binomial regression to estimate the relation between publication of C9343 and use of RT in the full sample and across strata of patient and health system characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 12,925 Medicare beneficiaries in our sample (mean age, 77.7 years), 76.5% received RT. Approximately 79% of women received RT before study publication compared with 75% after (adjusted relative risk of receiving RT postpublication v prepublication: 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95 to 0.98). Although use of RT was lower after the trial within all strata of age and life expectancy, the magnitude of this decrease did not differ significantly by strata. For instance, among patients with life expectancy less than 5 years, RT use decreased by 3.7%, from 44.4% prepublication to 40.7% postpublication. Among patients with life expectancy ≥ 10 years, RT use decreased by 3.0%, from 92.0% to 89.0%.

CONCLUSION

The C9343 trial had minimal impact on the use of RT among older women in the Medicare population, even among the oldest women and those with shorter life expectancies.

Factors noted to affect breast cancer treatment decisions of women aged 80 and older

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors that influence the breast cancer treatment decisions of women aged 80 and older.

DESIGN

Medical record review.

SETTING

One academic primary care clinic and two community health centers in Boston.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-five women aged 80 and older diagnosed with breast cancer between 1994 and 2004 and followed through June 30, 2010.

MEASUREMENTS

Data were abstracted on breast cancer characteristics, comorbidities, treatments received, and outcomes. Notes from primary care physicians, oncologists, and breast surgeons were reviewed to determine factors involved in treatment decision-making.

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis was 84.0 (interquartile range 82.0-86.3), 55 (84.6%) were non-Hispanic white, and 40 (61.5%) had at least one comorbidity. Nine women were diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ, 42 with a new primary invasive breast cancer, eight with a second primary, and six with a breast cancer recurrence. Sixty-three (96.9%) received some type of treatment. Fifty-six (86.2%) had at least one detailed physician note on treatment decision-making in their charts. The main categories found to influence participant, family, and physician treatment decision-making were tumor characteristics, ratio of treatment benefits to risks, logistics (e.g., transportation, finances), and participant age, health (including a concurrent diagnosis), and psychosocial characteristics. Family was involved in treatment discussions for 46 (70.8%) participants.

CONCLUSION

The quality of physician documentation about decision-making in these women was high. A great amount of thoughtful and complex decision-making involving patients, family, and physicians occurs after a woman aged 80 and older is diagnosed with breast cancer.

Breast cancer treatment practices in elderly women in a community hospital

Background. Elderly women with breast cancer are considered underdiagnosed and undertreated, and this adversely affects their overall survival. Methods. A total of 393 female breast cancer patients aged 70 years and older, diagnosed within the years 1989-1999, were identified from the tumor registry of The Brooklyn Hospital Center. Comparisons between the 3 different subgroups 70-74, 75-79, and 80 years and older were made using the Pearson Chi Square test. Results. Lumpectomy was performed in 42% of all patients, while mastectomy was done in 46% of patients. Adjuvant therapy such as chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and hormonal therapy were done in 12%, 25%, and 38%, respectively. Forty-seven percent of patients with positive lymph nodes received chemotherapy. Eighty-six percent of patients who were estrogen receptor-positive received adjuvant hormonal therapy. Overall five-year survival was only 14% for the ≥80 age group, compared to that of 32% and 35% for the 70-74 and the 75-79 age groups, respectively. Conclusions. Surgery was performed in majority of these patients, about half received lumpectomy, the other half mastectomy. Adjuvant therapies were frequently excluded, with only hormonal therapy being the most commonly used. Overall five-year survival is significantly worse in patients ≥80 years with breast cancer.

Hormone treatment without surgery for patients aged 75 years or older with operable breast cancer

Purpose

To evaluate the trend in the use of primary endocrine treatment (PET) for elderly patients with operable breast cancer and to study mean time to response (TTR), local control, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival.

Methods

Data of 184 patients aged ≥75 years, diagnosed with breast cancer in the south of the Netherlands between 2001 and 2008 and receiving PET, were analyzed.

Results

The percentage of women ≥75 years with breast cancer receiving PET in the south of the Netherlands decreased from 23% in the period 1988–1992 to 12% in 1997–2000, and increased to 29% in 2005–2008. Mean age at diagnosis of 184 patients treated with PET in the period 2001–2008 was 84 years (range 75–89 years). Mean length of follow-up was 2.6 years. In 107 patients (58%), an initial response was achieved (mean TTR 7 months), 21 patients (12%) showed stable disease. A total of 64 patients (35%), with or without prior response, eventually displayed progression (mean TTP 20 months). No differences in TTR and TTP were observed between the patients starting with tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor. One hundred nineteen (65%) of 184 patients had died by January 1, 2010. In 17 patients (14%), breast cancer was the cause of death.

Conclusions

Tumor progression was observed in a substantial proportion of the cohort, but only a small number of patients died of breast cancer. Further research is needed on the safety and effectiveness of PET for elderly women with breast cancer to justify the current widespread use.

Declining conventional cancer treatment and using complementary and alternative medicine: a problem or a challenge?

Background

Several studies have shown that a small but significant percentage of cancer patients decline one or more conventional cancer treatments and use complementary and alternative medicine (cam) instead.

Objectives

Here, drawing on the literature and on our own ongoing research, we describe why cancer patients decide to decline conventional cancer treatments, who those patients are, and the response by physicians to patients who make such decisions.

Results

Poor doctor–patient communication, the emotional impact of the cancer diagnosis, perceived severity of conventional treatment side effects, a high need for decision-making control, and strong beliefs in holistic healing appear to affect the decision by patients to decline some or all conventional cancer treatments. Many patients indicate that they value ongoing follow-up care from their oncologists provided that the oncologists respect their beliefs. Patients declining conventional treatments have a strong sense of internal control and prefer to make the final treatment decisions after considering the opinions of their doctors. Few studies have looked at the response by physicians to patients making such a decision. Where research has been done, it found that a tendency by doctors to dichotomize patient decisions as rational or irrational may interfere with the ability of the doctors to respond with sensitivity and understanding.

Conclusions

Declining conventional treatment is not necessarily an indicator of distrust of the medical system, but rather a reflection of many personal factors. Accepting and respecting such decisions may be instrumental in “keeping the door open.”

Quality of life during the course of cancer treatment in older newly diagnosed patients. Results of a prospective pilot study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this prospective study was to report the quality of life (QoL) of older cancer patients during the first year after diagnosis and factors influencing QoL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Newly diagnosed patients aged ≥65 years were recruited for a pilot prospective cohort study at the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada. Participants were interviewed at baseline, and at 1.5, 3, 4.5, 6, and 12 months. QoL was assessed at each interview using the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire with 30 items. Logistic regression was conducted to determine which sociodemographic, health, and functional status characteristics were associated with decline in global health status/QoL between baseline and 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

There were 112 participants at baseline (response rate 72%), median age of 74.1, and 70% were women. Between baseline and 12-month follow-up (n=78), 18 participants (23.1%) declined ≥10 points in global health status/QoL, while 34 participants (43.6%) remained stable and 23 participants (33.3%) improved ≥10 points. None of the sociodemographic, health, and functional status variables were associated with decline in logistic regression analyses.

CONCLUSION

Almost 25% of older adults experienced clinically relevant decline in their QoL. Further research is needed on which factors influence decline in QoL in older adults.

Quality-of-life: A study on patients of carcinoma breast and its pitfalls in Indian society

BACKGROUND

Traditionally outcomes of treatment have been limited to survival. However, the disease and its treatment may have an impact on Quality-of- Life (QoL). The major concerns for patients of carcinoma breast involved are survival, appearance and a fear of recurrence. In Indian society we may need a separate and modified approach to assess QoL. AIMS #ENTITYSTARTX00026;

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the QoL of patients of carcinoma breast and to ascertaining pitfalls for suitable correction in future studies on Indian patients. MATERIALS #ENTITYSTARTX00026;

METHODS

250 diagnosed patients of carcinoma breast were studied by a questionnaire on physical and psychological parameters. The results were assessed for applicability to our clientele.

RESULTS

We found that majority of patients enjoy a good and non-capacitating QoL. Factors that may contribute to poorer health perceptions and QoL include experiencing a menopausal transition as part of therapy, and feeling more vulnerable after cancer. Overall QoL was better in the older and illiterate patients. Patients with no co morbidity and early stage disease fared better against patients with co morbidities and advanced stage of malignancy. The parameters used in QoL studies in west may not be directly applicable to Indian patients but it does give us a start. We need to adapt to these parameters and draw our conclusion. But there are many methodological challenges inherent in working with our population. Researchers interested in studying our clientele's QoL need to be cognizant of certain issues to ensure high quality results.

Characteristics of older newly diagnosed cancer patients refusing cancer treatments

PURPOSE

With the aging of the population, there will be an increase in the number of older adults diagnosed with cancer. Little is known about the characteristics of older newly diagnosed cancer patients who refuse cancer treatment and how often they refuse. The aim of this paper was to describe the health and functional status characteristics of patients who refused cancer treatment.

METHODS

A prospective pilot study on health and vulnerability in older newly diagnosed cancer patients was conducted in the Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada. One hundred-twelve patients agreed to participate (response 72%). Health and functional status were assessed during the baseline interview; information on cancer treatment was obtained from the medical chart at baseline, 3 and 6 months follow-up. Descriptive techniques such as frequencies and means were used to describe the health and functional status of patients who refused treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 112 participants, 17 (15.2%) refused cancer treatment partially or completely. Of those 17, 15 were women and 2 men. Fifteen participants refused a part of their treatment upfront. Two refused all further treatment after severe toxicity. The majority of participants refusing cancer treatment were women with breast cancer and they mostly refused adjuvant chemotherapy. Participants who refused often lived alone, were less often married/living common-law, had activities of daily living disability, and often had early disease.

CONCLUSION

The majority of older newly diagnosed cancer patients underwent the recommended cancer treatment but partial or complete cancer treatment refusal in older newly diagnosed cancer patients was not uncommon.

Breast cancer in the elderly

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women and most breast cancers are not attributable to risk factors other than female gender and increased age. However, despite its increasing prevalence in the geriatric population, prospective clinical trials for older cancer patients do not exist and most data come from retrospective studies or subanalyses from general population studies. As a result physician's, patient's and family members' fear predominates and elderly patients do not receive the appropriate treatment when compared with younger ones. Treatment is offered according to biological age alone and life expectancy, comorbidity and functional status are not considered when deciding treatment strategy. Surgery is often denied to patients older than 70 years of age, radiotherapy and chemotherapy are omitted due to the fear of toxicity and hormonal therapy, even though it represents a great tool as adjuvant therapy, it is associated with significant morbidity when chosen as primary treatment. Palliation of symptoms remains the main goal for metastatic disease but for the rest of the patients improving disease-free survival in the early stages should guide therapy no matter chronological age.

The effect of comorbidity on the use of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival from colon cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Comorbidity has a well documented detrimental effect on cancer survival. However it is difficult to disentangle the direct effects of comorbidity on survival from indirect effects via the influence of comorbidity on treatment choice. This study aimed to assess the impact of comorbidity on colon cancer patient survival, the effect of comorbidity on treatment choices for these patients, and the impact of this on survival among those with comorbidity.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study reviewed 589 New Zealanders diagnosed with colon cancer in 1996–2003, followed until the end of 2005. Clinical and outcome data were obtained from clinical records and the national mortality database. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models were used to assess the impact of comorbidity on cancer specific and all-cause survival, the effect of comorbidity on chemotherapy recommendations for stage III patients, and the impact of this on survival among those with comorbidity.

Results

After adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, area deprivation, smoking, stage, grade and site of disease, higher Charlson comorbidity score was associated with poorer all-cause survival (HR = 2.63 95%CI:1.82–3.81 for Charlson score ≥ 3 compared with 0). Comorbidity count and several individual conditions were significantly related to poorer all-cause survival. A similar, but less marked effect was seen for cancer specific survival. Among patients with stage III colon cancer, those with a Charlson score ≥ 3 compared with 0 were less likely to be offered chemotherapy (19% compared with 84%) despite such therapy being associated with around a 60% reduction in excess mortality for both all-cause and cancer specific survival in these patients.

Conclusion

Comorbidity impacts on colon cancer survival thorough both physiological burden of disease and its impact on treatment choices. Some patients with comorbidity may forego chemotherapy unnecessarily, increasing avoidable cancer mortality.

Appropriateness of early breast cancer management in relation to patient and hospital characteristics: a population based study in Northern Italy

Administrative data may provide valuable information for monitoring the quality of care at population level and offer an efficient way of gathering data on individual patterns of care, and also to shed light on inequalities in access to appropriate medical care. The aim of the study was to investigate the role of patient and hospital characteristics in the initial treatment of early breast cancer using administrative data. Incident breast cancer patients were identified from hospital discharge records and linked to the radiotherapy outpatient database during 2000-2004 in the Piedmont region of Northwestern Italy. Women treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy (BCS + RT) were compared to those treated with BCS without radiotherapy (BCS w/o RT) or mastectomy using multinomial logistic regression models. Out of 16,022 incident cases, 46.2% received BCS + RT, 20.3% received BCS w/o RT, and 33.5% received a mastectomy. Compared to BCS + RT, the factors associated with BCS w/o RT were: increased age (OR = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.29-1.85, for ages 70-79 vs. <50), being unmarried (1.24; 1.13-1.36), presence of co-morbidities (1.32; 1.10-1.58), being treated at hospitals with low surgical volume (1.31; 1.07-1.60 for hospitals with less than 50 vs. > or =150 interventions/year), and living far from radiotherapy facilities (1.75; 1.39-2.20 for those at a distance of >45 min). These same factors were also associated with mastectomy. During the 5-year period observed, there was a trend of reduced probability of receiving a mastectomy (0.70; 0.56-0.88 for 2004 vs. 2000). The presence or absence of nodal involvement was positively associated with mastectomy (2.28; 1.83-2.85) and negatively associated with BCS w/o RT (0.65; 0.56-0.76). After adjustment for potential confounders, education level did not show any association with the type of treatment. Social and geographical factors, in addition to hospital specialization, should be considered to reduce inappropriateness of care for breast cancer.

Disentangling the effects of race on breast cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

African Americans (AA) have higher mortality from breast cancer compared with white Americans (WA). Studies using population-based cancer registries have attributed this to disparities in treatment after normalizing the AA and WA populations for differences in disease stage. However, those studies were hampered by lack of comorbidity data and limited information about systemic treatments. The objective of the current study was to investigate racial disparities in breast cancer treatment by conducting a comprehensive medical records review of women who were diagnosed with breast cancer at the Karmanos Cancer Institute (KCI) in Detroit, Michigan.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of 651 women who were diagnosed with primary breast cancer between 1990 and 1996 at KCI. Multivariable logistic regression analysis controlling for sociodemographic factors, tumor characteristics, comorbidities, and health insurance status was used to assess whether there were differences between WA and AA in the receipt of breast-conserving surgery (BCS), radiation, tamoxifen, and chemotherapy.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between WA and AA in the receipt of BCS versus mastectomy. Patients with local-stage disease who were enrolled in government insurance plans underwent mastectomy more often (vs BCS plus radiation) compared with patients who were enrolled in nongovernment plans. The rates of receipt of tamoxifen and chemotherapy were similar for local-stage WA and local-stage AA. However, WA were more likely to receive tamoxifen and/or chemotherapy for regional-stage disease. Married women with regional disease were more likely to receive chemotherapy than nonmarried women.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this study may be used to target educational interventions to improve the use of adjuvant therapies among AA women who have regional-stage disease.

Surgery is associated with lower morbidity and longer survival in elderly breast cancer patients over 80

As breast cancer is the most frequent cancer in the elderly with a peak incidence of 1 in 10 by the age of 80, it is important to establish optimum therapy in this group. We conducted a case note-based retrospective study of all elderly primary breast cancer patients aged 80 and above between 1992 and 2002. The type of treatment, complications, disease progression, recurrence, and overall survival were recorded. In all 110 patients aged 80 and above were treated for primary breast cancer, with 32 patients having advanced disease. Of these, 62 patients received primary endocrine treatment. 48 patients underwent surgery with 30 patients undergoing mastectomy. At follow-up, 34 patients suffered disease progression in the primary endocrine treatment group and three patients had local recurrence in the surgical group. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly better survival in the surgical treatment group when compared with the primary endocrine treatment group, both in the early disease (n = 41; median survival: 71 months; compared to n = 37; median survival: 42 months; p = 0.0002) and the advanced disease (n = 7; median survival: 48 months; compared to n = 25; median survival: 36 months; p = 0.03). Prompt surgery and adjuvant treatment can decrease relapse and improve survival even in patients older than 80 years.

Management of early breast cancer in the elderly

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women with an age related increase in incidence ranging from 1 in 50 at age 50 to 1 in 10 at age 80. This is particularly significant in view of the changing demographics in the western population, characterised by an aging population and increased life expectancy. However in spite of favourable prognostic factors and less aggressive biological behaviour, elderly breast cancer patients receive less aggressive treatment when compared with their younger counterparts. Appropriate treatment should be offered depending on physiological reserve and comorbidities. Primary endocrine treatment has been shown to be associated with significant morbidity in terms of disease progression. Prompt surgery and adjuvant treatment can decrease relapse and improve survival. Radiation therapy is shown to decrease local relapse and chemotherapy may have a role in a select group of patients with adverse prognostic factors. With incidence of breast cancer bound to increase in the elderly population, it is essential to establish optimum therapy in this cohort of patients as studies reveal good outcome from standard treatment.

Breast surgery: minimally invasive diagnosis and treatment

The increasingly large proportion of elderly women in the United States population carries a disproportionate burden of breast cancer. The advent of minimally invasive surgical techniques applicable to breast disease has brought new opportunities to diagnose and treat breast cancer in the older population. This article reviews issues important to the evolving field of breast cancer management in older women: cancer risk and screening considerations, diagnosis and biopsy approaches, and surgical treatment options based on current studies and recommendations.

Effects of young age at presentation on survival in breast cancer

Background

Young age remains a controversial issue as a prognostic factor in breast cancer. Debate includes patients from different parts of the world. Almost 50% of patients with breast cancer seen at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC) are below age 50.

Methods

We reviewed 1320 patients seen at AUBMC between 1990 and 2001. We divided them in three age groups: Below 35, 35–50, and above 50. Data and survival were analyzed using Chi-square, Cox regression analysis, and Kaplan Meier.

Results

Mean age at presentation was 50.8 years. 107 patients were below age 35, 526 between 35–50 and 687 patients above age 50. Disease stages were as follows: stage I: 14.4%, stage II: 59.9%, stage III: 20% and stage IV: 5.7%. Hormone receptors were positive in 71.8% of patients below 35, in 67.6% of patients 35–50 and in 78.3% of patients above 50. Grade of tumor was higher as age at presentation was lower. More young patients received anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Of hormone receptor-positive patients, 83.8% of those below age 35 years, 87.76% of those aged 35–50 years, and 91.2% of those aged above 50 years received adjuvant tamoxifen. The mean follow up time was 3.7 +/- 2.9 years. Time to death was the only variable analyzed for survival analysis. Excluding stage IV patients, tumor size, lymph node, tumor grade and negative hormone receptors were inversely proportional to survival. Higher percentage of young patients at presentation developed metastasis (32.4% of patients below 35, as compared to 22.9% of patients 35–50 and 22.8% of patients above 50) and had a worse survival. Young age had a negative impact on survival of patients with positive axillary lymph nodes, and survival of patients with positive hormonal receptors, but not on survival of patients with negative lymph nodes, or patients with negative hormonal receptors.

Conclusion

Young age at presentation conferred a worse prognosis in spite of a higher than expected positive hormone receptor status, more anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy and equivalent adjuvant tamoxifen hormonal therapy in younger patients. This negative impact on survival was seen in patients with positive lymph nodes and those with positive hormonal receptors.

Association between diabetes mellitus and adverse characteristics of breast cancer at presentation

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with increased incidence and inferior outcome of various malignancies. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of type 2 diabetes on breast cancer characteristics at presentation. The study population included 79 diabetic and 158 age-matched non-diabetic patients. Parity, country of birth, co-morbidity other than diabetes, and mode of diagnosis were similar in both groups. Mean body mass index (BMI) was higher among diabetic patients. Tumour stage and size were higher among diabetic patients and the differences remained significant after adjustment for BMI. Moreover, after adjustment for BMI, breast cancer among diabetic patients was more often hormone receptor negative. Our results show that diabetes mellitus is associated with negative prognostic factors at breast cancer presentation.

Psychosocial determinants and outcomes of chemotherapy in older women with breast cancer: what do we know? What do we need to know?

With the aging of the U.S. population and rising breast cancer incidence with advancing age, the absolute number of women aged 65 years and older diagnosed with and surviving breast cancer will dramatically increase over the coming decades. Despite this demographic imperative, we know little about the impact of adjuvant therapies in this age group. We synthesized data to describe key findings and gaps in knowledge about the outcomes of adjuvant breast cancer treatment in women aged 65 years and and older ("older women"). We reviewed research published between 1995 and June 2005 on breast cancer outcomes among older women treated with adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Outcomes included communication, emotional distress, satisfaction, and multiple quality-of-life domains. Only 16 articles focused exclusively on older women and chemotherapy; and only one included a large sample of older women (N = 1755). Most common domains included comorbidities, symptoms, and survival. Of the 13 clinical trials and three observational studies we reviewed, only one clinical trial measured quality of life and psychological factors such as coping. None of the studies examined patient preferences or patient-physician communication (processes of care) in older women. Few studies have been designed to specifically evaluate adjuvant therapy processes and outcomes among older women, especially interactions between treatment and comorbidity, and the impact of the processes of care on outcomes. In addition, only narrow segments of the older population with breast cancer (e.g., well-educated, nonminority women) have been included in trials to date. Thus, at present we do not have sufficient data to assist physicians and their older patients in developing adjuvant treatment decisions and plans tailored to older women's needs, preferences, and concerns.

Medical decision-making for seriously ill non-elderly and elderly patients

OBJECTIVES

Age of patients by itself is no longer a contra-indication for most medical interventions. The increase of possible interventions for elderly patients has contributed to a sharp age-specific increase of health care costs. Our study aimed to increase the insight in medical decision-making about life-prolonging interventions for patients from non-elderly and elderly age groups.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

Clinical practices in three settings: oncology, nursing home and cardiology.

SUBJECTS

Eighty-one physicians, representing a response of 60%.

METHODS

Face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire addressing decision-making about the application of taxoid treatment for breast cancer patients, the application of bypass surgery for patients with angina pectoris under or over 70 years of age, and referral to specialist treatment because of a suspected malignancy of nursing home patients under or over 75 years of age.

RESULTS

The chance of having been treated was in all settings lower for patients with a relatively poor quality of life and for patients who had no (known) preference to be treated. No differences were found for chance of having been treated between non-elderly and elderly patients with similar patient characteristics. The only exception to this is the patient preference concerning treatment: elderly patients were more likely to have been treated against their will than non-elderly patients were.

CONCLUSIONS

A relatively high frequency of non-treatment decisions for elderly patients may be predominantly explained by the fact that patient characteristics that determine non-treatment decision-making are more prevalent in elderly age groups, and not by the effect of age per se.

Breast cancer treatment in older women

This article presents the author's current approaches to the management of breast cancer in older women, with emphasis on clinical and surgical treatment of the disease in this population. There are controversies surrounding the management of breast cancer in this population regarding adjuvant therapy, radiation therapy and surgical options. We endeavor to address these issues in the article.

‘A little bitty spot and I'm a big man’: patients' perspectives on refusing diagnosis or treatment for lung cancer

Patient refusal of physicians' recommendations may partially account for variations in lung cancer treatment affecting survival. Reasons for refusal have not been well researched, and patients who refuse are often labeled derogatorily as irrational or enigmatically non-compliant. This study explored why patients refused recommendations for further diagnosis or treatment of lung cancer. We conducted in-depth interviews with nine patients, identified and recruited over a 2-year period, with documented refusal of doctors' recommendations. Recruiting was hampered by deaths, logistics, and refusal to participate. Questions focused on participants' understanding of disease, medical recommendations, and perceptions of decision-making. Transcripts were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Participants emphasized self-efficacy, minimizing threat, fatalism or faith, and distrust of medical authority; explanations were often multi-dimensional. Comments included complaints about communication with physicians, health system discontinuities, and impact of social support. Explanations of participants' decisions reflected several ways of coping with an undesirable situation, including strategies for reducing, sustaining, and increasing uncertainty. Problematic Integration Theory helps to explain patients' difficulties in managing uncertainty when assessments of disease outcomes and treatment recommendations diverge. Implications for clinical communication include increasing trust while delivering bad news, understanding the source of resistance to recommendations, and discussing palliative care.

Breast cancer in the elderly: the role of adjuvant radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate available data on breast conserving surgery (BCS) with or without radiation therapy (RT), and alternative options (e.g. Tamoxifen alone) (Tam), focusing specifically on the older patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The MEDLINE was searched for the terms elderly, BCS, adjuvant/postoperative RT, Tamoxifen, and randomized trials from 1992 to 2002.

RESULTS

Authors reviewed papers of general interest on the elderly and breast cancer (BC), meta-analysis, randomized trials on BCS+/-RT and Tam+/-surgery without RT, retrospective non-randomized trials, and reported on prognostic factors for local recurrence in BCS alone, including biomarkers, attempts made to define a low-risk group, and methods of modification of the current, protracted standard adjuvant RT course.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative RT after BCS has a firm rationale; in current clinical practice, if the BCS+RT is medically appropriate and the patient shares the choice, after a full information of the available options and their implications, it is clinically sound to propose this approach. However, there is controversy whether a subgroup of elderly patients could be safely spared: in this setting a randomized trial is clearly warranted.

Outcomes and quality of life following breast cancer treatment in older women: when, why, how much, and what do women want?

BACKGROUND

There are few comprehensive reviews of breast cancer outcomes in older women. We synthesize data to describe key findings and gaps in knowledge about the outcomes of breast cancer in this population.

METHODS

We reviewed research published between 1995 and June 2003 on breast cancer quality of life and outcomes among women aged 65 and older treated for breast cancer. Outcomes included communication, satisfaction, and multiple quality of life domains.

RESULTS

Few randomized trials or cohort studies that measured quality of life after treatment focused exclusively on older women. Studies from older women generally noted that, with the exception of axillary dissection, type of surgical treatment generally had no effect on long-term outcomes. In contrast, the processes of care, such as choosing therapy, good patient-physician communication, receiving treatment concordant with preferences about body image, and low perceptions of bias, were associated with better quality of life and satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

With the exception of axillary dissection, the processes of care, and not the therapy itself, seem to be the most important determinants of long-term quality of life in older women.

Older women with breast carcinoma are less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy: evidence of possible age bias?

BACKGROUND

Older women with breast carcinoma are less likely than younger women to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. The authors hypothesized that after controlling for confounders (i.e., variables related to both age and chemotherapy use) and effect modifiers (i.e., variables that have a significant interaction with age), age would become a less significant factor for predicting adjuvant chemotherapy use.

METHODS

Data on 480 women with localized breast carcinoma were entered into the National Comprehensive Cancer Network database at The Ohio State University Medical Center. Women were divided into 3 groups: women age < 50 years (n = 143 [30%]), women ages 50-65 years (n = 216 [45%]), and women age > 65 years (n = 121 [25%]). Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used for univariate analyses of the variables of interest, and logistic regression was used for multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

After adjustment for confounders (stage, tumor size, progesterone receptor status, and lymph node involvement) and effect modifiers (namely, estrogen receptor [ER] status), the odds of not receiving chemotherapy for women ages 50-65 years and women age > 65 years with ER-positive breast carcinoma were approximately 6 (odds ratio [OR], 6.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1-13.3; P < 0.001) and 62 (OR, 62.4; 95% CI, 21.8-178.7; P < 0.001) times greater, respectively, than the odds for women age < 50 years. Women ages 50-65 years with ER-negative breast carcinoma were not significantly different from women age < 50 years with respect to chemotherapy use (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.5-7.3; P = 0.374). However, the odds of not receiving chemotherapy for women age > 65 years with ER-negative breast carcinoma were 7 times (OR, 6.7; 95% CI, 1.5-30.6; P = 0.013) greater than the odds for women age < 50 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study indicate that based on older age alone, women are less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, the results suggest that age bias may contribute to undertreatment and lack of accrual of older women into clinical trials.

Current status and future directions of geriatric general surgery

As the population ages and requires more health care, a significant part of this is in surgical services. As elderly patients account for a growing proportion of most surgeons' practices, it is apparent that this patient group has special requirements, differences in outcomes, and different physiology from other patients encountered in the typical surgical practice. The greater frequency of emergency operations in older than in younger patients, with higher morbidity and mortality rates, compounds these differences. This paper reviews the current status of general surgery in older patients with a special focus on emergency procedures, major abdominal surgery, biliary disease, endocrine disease, and breast cancer. Each of these areas is a source of considerable interest to general surgeons.