Human recombinant erythropoietin and quality of life: a wonder drug or something to wonder about?

A quick scoping review of efficacy, safety, economic, and health-related quality-of-life outcomes of short- and long-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia and chronic kidney disease anemia

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are man-made forms of erythropoietin used in the treatment of anemia. This quick-scoping review of systematic literature reviews (SLRs) was conducted to define the clinical, economic, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes for short-acting and long-acting ESAs in patients with chronic kidney disease-induced anemia (CKD-IA) and patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from their establishment until October 2017. SLRs related to the use of short-acting and long-acting ESAs in the treatment of CIA and CKD-IA were included. Forty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The evidence suggests little difference in efficacy, HRQoL, and safety outcomes among ESA types. Cost-effectiveness and market price are likely to become determining factors driving the choice of agent. Comparative studies and costing models accounting for the utilization of biosimilars are needed to establish which ESAs are more cost-effective.

Erythropoietin and neuroprotection: a therapeutic perspective

Recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) is used to correct for anaemia caused by chronic renal failure or cancer therapy. Improvement of the quality of life of anaemic patients treated with EPO was recently demonstrated and preliminary clinical results suggest an improvement of cognitive functions in patients receiving EPO. High expression of EPO and its receptor in the brain during embryonic development has led to the investigation of not only the neurotrophic role of EPO but also its neuroprotective properties. The neuroprotective effects of EPO have various complementary actions including antagonism of the effects of glutamate, increased expression of antioxidant enzymes, changes in production of neurotransmitters and induction of neuroglobin. Convincing experimental results suggest a blood-brain transport of EPO whereas clinical pharmacokinetic data do not as yet support this. The neuroprotective effects of EPO and its therapeutic promise need to be underlined.

Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Anaemia associated with cancer and cancer therapy is an important clinical factor in the treatment of malignant diseases. Therapeutic alternatives are recombinant human erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) and red blood cell transfusions.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of ESAs to either prevent or treat anaemia in cancer patients.

SEARCH METHODS

This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004. We searched the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE and other databases. Searches were done for the periods 01/1985 to 12/2001 for the first review, 1/2002 to 04/2005 for the first update and to November 2011 for the current update. We also contacted experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials on managing anaemia in cancer patients receiving or not receiving anti-cancer therapy that compared the use of ESAs (plus transfusion if needed).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Several review authors assessed trial quality and extracted data. One review author assessed quality assessment and extracted data, a second review author checked for correctness.

MAIN RESULTS

This update of the systematic review includes a total of 91 trials with 20,102 participants. Use of ESAs significantly reduced the relative risk of red blood cell transfusions (risk ratio (RR) 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.68, 70 trials, N = 16,093). On average, participants in the ESAs group received one unit of blood less than the control group (mean difference (MD) -0.98; 95% CI -1.17 to -0.78, 19 trials, N = 4,715). Haematological response was observed more often in participants receiving ESAs (RR 3.93; 95% CI 3.10 to 3.71, 31 trials, N = 6,413). There was suggestive evidence that ESAs may improve Quality of Life (QoL). There was strong evidence that ESAs increase mortality during active study period (hazard ratio (HR) 1.17; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.29, 70 trials, N = 15,935) and some evidence that ESAs decrease overall survival (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11, 78 trials, N = 19,003). The risk ratio for thromboembolic complications was increased in patients receiving ESAs compared to controls (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.74; 57 trials, N = 15,498). ESAs may also increase the risk for hypertension (fixed-effect model: RR 1.30; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.56; random-effects model: RR 1.12; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.33, 31 trials, N = 7,228) and thrombocytopenia/haemorrhage (RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.42; 21 trials, N = 4,507). There was insufficient evidence to support an effect of ESA on tumour response (fixed-effect RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.06, 15 trials, N = 5,012).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

ESAs reduce the need for red blood cell transfusions but increase the risk for thromboembolic events and deaths. There is suggestive evidence that ESAs may improve QoL. Whether and how ESAs affects tumour control remains uncertain. The increased risk of death and thromboembolic events should be balanced against the potential benefits of ESA treatment taking into account each patient's clinical circumstances and preferences. More data are needed for the effect of these drugs on quality of life and tumour progression. Further research is needed to clarify cellular and molecular mechanisms and pathways of the effects of ESAs on thrombogenesis and their potential effects on tumour growth.

Erythropoietin or Darbepoetin for patients with cancer--meta-analysis based on individual patient data

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) reduce anemia in cancer patients and may improve quality of life, but there are concerns that ESAs might increase mortality.

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to examine the effect of ESAs and identify factors that modify the effects of ESAs on overall survival, progression free survival, thromboembolic and cardiovascular events as well as need for transfusions and other important safety and efficacy outcomes in cancer patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase and conference proceedings for eligible trials. Manufacturers of ESAs were contacted to identify additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials comparing epoetin or darbepoetin plus red blood cell transfusions (as necessary) versus red blood cell transfusions (as necessary) alone, to prevent or treat anemia in adult or pediatric cancer patients with or without concurrent antineoplastic therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing epoetin alpha, epoetin beta or darbepoetin alpha plus red blood cell transfusions versus transfusion alone, for prophylaxis or therapy of anemia while or after receiving anti-cancer treatment. Patient-level data were obtained and analyzed by independent statisticians at two academic departments, using fixed-effects and random-effects meta-analysis. Analyses were according to the intention-to-treat principle. Primary endpoints were on study mortality and overall survival during the longest available follow-up, regardless of anticancer treatment, and in patients receiving chemotherapy. Tests for interactions were used to identify differences in effects of ESAs on mortality across pre-specified subgroups. The present review reports only the results for the primary endpoint.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 13933 cancer patients from 53 trials were analyzed, 1530 patients died on-study and 4993 overall. ESAs increased on study mortality (combined hazard ratio [cHR] 1.17; 95% CI 1.06-1.30) and worsened overall survival (cHR 1.06; 95% CI 1.00-1.12), with little heterogeneity between trials (I(2) 0%, p=0.87 and I(2) 7.1%, p=0.33, respectively). Thirty-eight trials enrolled 10441 patients receiving chemotherapy. The cHR for on study mortality was 1.10 (95% CI 0.98-1.24) and 1.04; 95% CI 0.97-1.11) for overall survival. There was little evidence for a difference between trials of patients receiving different cancer treatments (P for interaction=0.42).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

ESA treatment in cancer patients increased on study mortality and worsened overall survival. For patients undergoing chemotherapy the increase was less pronounced, but an adverse effect could not be excluded.

Recombinant human epoetin beta in the treatment of chemotherapy-related anemia

Anemia is a common complication of systemic anti-cancer treatment. In this context epoetin beta, like other erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), has demonstrable efficacy in raising Hb concentration and reducing the requirement for red cell transfusion. Consequently ESA therapy has gained increasing prominence in the management of chemotherapy-related anemia. However, recent trial data have suggested a higher rate of thromboembolic events, enhanced tumor progression and reduced survival in some patients with cancer who receive ESA therapy. In response, regulatory authorities have mandated increasingly restrictive label changes. In light of these new developments we consider the current role of epoetin beta in the management of chemotherapy-related anemia.

Interpretation and review of health-related quality of life data in CKD patients receiving treatment for anemia

Recent evidence suggests that targeting higher hemoglobin values with erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) may lack mortality benefits and may even result in adverse cardiovascular complications when used in chronic kidney disease patients. However, ESAs are frequently reported to result in improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The purpose of this review is to evaluate the magnitude and nature of ESA-associated improvements in HRQOL, as well as to understand how to interpret the clinical significance of HRQOL data. HRQOL findings should be analyzed not by statistical significance but rather by using a minimal clinically important difference approach, or, alternatively, a distribution-based approach (such as Cohen's effect size). HRQOL domains that are most improved with ESAs relate to physical symptoms, vitality, energy, and performance; domains of social functioning and mental health show modest improvement, whereas the domains of emotional functioning and pain show very little improvement. Additional domains not measured by commonly used instruments (such as the SF-36) that have been shown to improve with ESAs include sleep, cognitive functioning, and sexual functioning. The maximal increase in HRQOL per incremental increase in hemoglobin appears to occur in the range of 10-12 g/dl. Beyond this range, additional normalization of hemoglobin (to 12-14 g/dl) results in continued (albeit blunted) improvements in HRQOL.

Erythropoietin and cancer, a double-edged sword

This editorial is focused on the double controversial action of erythropoietin, acting as anticancer agent and as a promoting cancer agent.

The erythropoietin receptor in normal and cancer tissues

The hormone erythropoietin (EPO) is essential for the survival, proliferation and differentiation of the erythrocytic progenitors. The EPO receptor (EPO-R) of erythrocytic cells belongs to the cytokine class I receptor family and signals through various protein kinases and STAT transcription factors. The EPO-R is also expressed in many organs outside the bone marrow, suggesting that EPO is a pleiotropic anti-apoptotic factor. The controversial issue as to whether the EPO-R is functional in tumor tissue is critically reviewed. Importantly, most studies of EPO-R detection in tumor tissue have provided falsely positive results because of the lack of EPO-R specific antibodies. However, endogenous EPO appears to be necessary to maintain the viability of endothelial cells and to promote tumor angiogenesis. Although there is no clinical proof that the administration of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) promotes tumor growth and mortality, present recommendations are that (i) ESAs should be administered at the lowest dose sufficient to avoid the need for red blood cell transfusions, (ii) ESAs should not be used in patients with active malignant disease not receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy, (iii) ESAs should be discontinued following the completion of a chemotherapy course, (iv) the target Hb should be 12 g/dL and not higher and (v) the risks of shortened survival and tumor progression have not been excluded when ESAs are dosed to target Hb <12 g/dL.

Risks and benefits of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in cancer management

Anemia is frequently diagnosed in patients with cancer and its treatment is an important clinical problem. The deficiency in red blood cells (RBCs) can be a debilitating problem, and anemia correlates with poor performance status, deteriorates quality of life, and may negatively influence the prognosis of cancer patients. The development of recombinant human erythropoietins (rhEPO) provides a therapeutic option in patients with mild to moderate anemia. However, clinical experience demonstrates that more than half of anemic cancer patients are not treated. There is clear evidence that rhEPO reliably increases haemoglobin (Hb) levels in patients suffering from cancer-related or treatment-associated anemia. The dosing and management of these patients should strictly follow evidence-based guidelines of the clinical societies, as well as the manufacturer's recommendations. Furthermore, treatment of patients beyond the correction of anemia must be regarded as potentially harmful and should only be conducted in an experimental clinical setting. In this review, recently published recommendations and standards for the use of rhEPO will be discussed.

Putting evidence into practice: evidence-based interventions for fatigue during and following cancer and its treatment

Cancer-related fatigue has a significant impact on patients' physical and psychosocial functioning, symptom distress, and quality of life, yet it remains under-recognized and undertreated. The Oncology Nursing Society's Putting Evidence Into Practice initiative sought to improve patient outcomes relative to this important problem by critically examining and summarizing the evidence base for interventions to prevent and manage fatigue during and following treatment. This article critically reviews and summarizes the available empirical evidence regarding interventions for cancer-related fatigue. In addition to offering patients and clinicians a tool to facilitate effective management of the distressing symptom, this evidence-based review identifies gaps in knowledge and research opportunities.

Cancer-Related Fatigue

PURPOSE

Cancer-related fatigue contributes to negative outcomes relative to psychosocial and symptom distress, functional status, and quality of life, and yet it is often underdiagnosed and management is frequently suboptimal.

DESIGN

Systematic database searches were conducted, and primary research reports and meta-analyses of quantitative studies of interventions for fatigue published in English were identified and critically examined.

RESULTS

This paper reviews the etiology and evaluation of cancer-related fatigue and analyzes current empirical evidence supporting pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic techniques for its management.

DISCUSSION

A variety of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic techniques to manage cancer-related fatigue have been studied, although most of the evidence is from single-arm pilot studies with small sample sizes, rather than from adequately powered, multicenter, randomized controlled trials. Continued research in ethnically and racially diverse samples is needed to identify the interventions that are most effective in specific cancer subpopulations and to develop and test interventions for fatigue at each phase in the illness trajectory.

Cancer-related anemia and recombinant human erythropoietin--an updated overview

For cancer patients, anemia can be a debilitating problem that negatively influences their overall quality of life and worsens their prognosis. The condition is caused either by the cancer itself or by cytotoxic treatment. Anemia is the primary indication for transfusion of red blood cells, but the development of recombinant human erythropoietins (epoetins) provides an alternative to red blood cell transfusions. Treatment with epoetins has been shown to reduce transfusion rates and increase hemoglobin response. There is some evidence that epoetins improve quality of life. It remains unclear, however, whether erythropoietin affects tumor growth and survival, and this area requires further investigation. Data from clinical trials suggest that erythropoietin increases the risk of thromboembolic complications. In the management of anemic patients, physicians should follow closely the dosing recommendations in products' package inserts or the ASCO/American Society of Hematology guidelines. Treatment of patients beyond the correction of anemia, however, has to be regarded as experimental and is potentially harmful, so should only be conducted in clinical trials.

Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Anaemia associated with cancer and cancer therapy is an important clinical factor in the treatment of malignant diseases. Therapeutic alternatives are recombinant human erythropoietin (Epo), darbepoetin (Darbepo) and red blood cell transfusions.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effects of Epo or Darbepo to either prevent or treat anaemia in cancer patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE and other data bases. Searches were done for the periods 01/1985 to 12/2001 for the first review and 1/2002 to 04/2005 for the update. We also contacted experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials on managing anaemia in cancer patients that compared the use of Epo/Darbepo (plus transfusion if needed) with observation until red blood cell transfusion was required.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Several reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

This update of the systematic review included a total of 57 trials with 9,353 patients. Of these, 27 trials with 3,287 adults were also included in the first Cochrane Review. Thirty trials with 6,066 patients were added during the update process. Use of Epo/Darbepo significantly reduced the relative risk of red blood cell transfusions (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.68, 42 trials, n = 6,510). On average participants in the Epo/Darbepo group received one unit of blood less than the control group (WMD -1.05; 95% CI -1.32 to -0.78, 14 trials, n = 2,353). For participants with baseline haemoglobin below 12 g/dL haematological response was observed more often in participants receiving Epo/Darbepo (RR 3.43; 95% CI 3.07 to 3.84, 22 trials, n = 4,307). There was suggestive evidence that Epo/Darbepo may improve Quality of Life (QoL). The relative risk for thrombo embolic complications was increased in patients receiving Epo/Darbepo compared to controls (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.06; 35 trials, n = 6,769). Uncertainties remain whether and how Epo/Darbepo effects tumour response (fixed effect RR 1.12; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.23, 13 trials, n = 2,833; random effects: RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.26) or overall survival (unadjusted and adjusted data: HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.18; 42 trials, n = 8,167).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is consistent evidence that administration of Epo/Darbepo reduces the relative risk for blood transfusions and the number of units transfused in cancer patients. For patients with baseline haemoglobin below 12 g/dL (mild anaemia) there is strong evidence that Epo/Darbepo improves haematological response. There is suggestive evidence that Epo/Darbepo may improve QoL. However, there is strong evidence that Epo/Darbepo increases the relative risk for thrombo embolic complications. Whether and how Epo/Darbepo effects tumour response and overall survival remains uncertain.

The relationship between patient knowledge of hemoglobin levels and health-related quality of life

BACKGROUND

An anti-anemia drug may improve self-reported quality of life (QOL) partly because patients know their hemoglobin level is rising. In the absence of any published studies on this topic, the authors investigated the association between knowledge of hemoglobin levels and self-reported QOL.

METHODS

The study analyzed health-related QOL (HRQOL) data from five randomized clinical trials of erythropoietic therapy in patients with cancer-related anemia. Patients were asked whether they knew their hemoglobin level and, if so, to report its value. Patients (n=1007) were grouped into three categories depending on the extent and accuracy of hemoglobin level knowledge. HRQOL scale scores were compared between categories.

RESULTS

Only 23.2% of patients reported knowing their hemoglobin level at the end of the study; however, the value was accurate (within 1 g/dl) in 88.0% of these patients. On five of the 11 HRQOL scales studied, there was a significant association between knowledge of hemoglobin level and HRQOL score. However, the magnitude of the mean difference between those who knew vs. those who did not know their hemoglobin was generally below scale thresholds for minimally important differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient knowledge of hemoglobin level has a modest association with some aspects of self-reported HRQOL. The magnitude of this association, where it exists, would be unlikely to explain large group differences in HRQOL reports over time, even for patients who know their hemoglobin level.

Erythropoietin stimulates growth and STAT5 phosphorylation in human prostate epithelial and prostate cancer cells

BACKGROUND

Erythropoietin (Epo), the principal regulator of erythroid progenitor survival, growth, and differentiation, initiates its action by binding to its cognate cell surface receptor (EpoR). EpoR have been identified on a variety of non-hematopoietic cells, both normal and malignant, however, little is known about the function of EpoR on malignant cells.

METHODS

RT-PCR, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry were used to demonstrate that prostate cancer cells express EpoR at both the gene and protein level. Cell proliferation assays and STAT5 phosphorylation were used to demonstrate Epo's mitogenic action and intracellular signaling, respectively.

RESULTS

We have demonstrated that transformed prostate epithelial and prostate cancer cell lines, as well as primary prostate tissue, express the EpoR. Importantly, the EpoR on prostate cells are functional, as demonstrated by the observation that each of the cell lines exhibited a dose-dependent proliferative response to Epo, and that Epo triggered STAT5b phosphorylation in the cells.

CONCLUSION

Human prostatic epithelial cells and prostate cancer cells express functional EpoR, and Epo serves as a growth factor for these cells. These results have implications for our understanding of normal prostatic growth and development and of the pathobiology of human prostate cancer.

Quality of life may be affected more by disease parameters and response to therapy than by haemoglobin changes

Earlier studies showing a negative impact of anaemia on quality of life (QOL) lack adequate adjustment for confounding factors such as disease stage and tumour response. We examined the impact of haemoglobin concentration on QOL scores of 745 multiple myeloma patients followed from diagnosis, adjusting for objective disease parameters. Data from two Nordic studies with the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire were analysed using linear regression analysis. Haemoglobin was independently related only to fatigue at baseline (P = 0.001) and at 12 months (P = 0.010). In multivariate analysis, extent of skeletal disease was at least as strong a predictor for fatigue at diagnosis as haemoglobin and was also related to other important QOL scores such as physical functioning, role functioning, global QOL and pain (P < 0.001). At 12 months' follow-up, response to therapy was related to physical functioning (P < 0.001) and pain (P = 0.001). In conclusion, haemoglobin and extent of skeletal disease were both predictors for fatigue in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, but extent of skeletal disease was also associated with other important QOL scores. During follow-up, response to therapy emerged as an important predictor variable. When examining the effect of haemoglobin on QOL, it is essential to adjust for disease parameters and response to therapy in order not to overestimate the impact of haemoglobin on QOL. Our findings imply that uncontrolled studies on the effect of erythropoietin (EPO) in cancer patients may be making exaggerated claims for the effect of EPO on QOL.

Recombinant human erythropoietin in oncology: current status and further developments

Anaemia effects up to 90% of cancer patients, with more than 60% requiring blood transfusion during or after treatment. With the advent of recombinant human erythropoietins (rHuEPO), an alternative to red blood cell transfusion has become available. So far, three drugs have been approved for the treatment of anaemia in patients with malignancies (epoetin alfa, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa). New concepts for the use of erythropoietin in cancer patients include 3- and 4-weekly dosing, as well as loading-dose concepts. Important factors helping to judge the impact of erythropoietin in cancer treatment include pharmacoeconomics and better predictive factors. Lately, the influence of erythropoietin therapy on survival in cancer patients has been discussed very intensively, because conflicting data have emerged. Studies aimed at correcting anaemia in cancer patients had indicated a possible survival advantage of those patients receiving erythropoietin. In contrast, two recent trials aimed at correction of haemoglobin levels beyond anaemia reported a poorer survival of patients receiving erythropoietin. This might grossly be attributed to a higher risk of thrombosis in these patients. The largest systematic review on the use of erythropoietin in cancer patients undergoing treatment indicates a suggestive but not significant survival advantage of erythropoietin-treated patients. In addition, very recent results of a Food and Drug Administration meeting on safety and survival of patients treated with erythropoietin are presented.

The impact of weekly dosing of epoetin alfa on the haematological parameters and on the quality of life of anaemic cancer patients

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and the impact of once-weekly administration of epoetin alfa (Ea) on the management of anaemia and on the quality of life (QOL) of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Eighty cancer patients with life expectancy > or = 24 weeks and haemoglobin (Hb) levels < 10.5 g/dL were studied. After an initial screening of patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, Ea 40000 U once a week was administered over a period of 4 months. In case of patients with Hb level exceeding > 14 g/dL or in case of non-response, the dosage was reconsidered. Every month, data regarding Hb levels, clinical variations, changes in the chemotherapy regimen and transfusion use since the last study visit, were evaluated. The Linear Analogue Scale Assessment scale was used for the evaluation of the QOL. The readmissions to hospital rates (P < 0.002) and the transfusion use rates (P < 0.003) were significantly decreased comparatively with baseline. A mean increase from baseline to the final Hb level (P < 0.001) was established, as well as a significant improvement in the functional ability, energy and in the overall QOL (P < 0.001). In conclusion, the treatment of cancer patients with Ea once-weekly is effective and safe, improving their haematological parameters and QOL.

Recombinant Human Erythropoietin and Overall Survival in Cancer Patients: Results of a Comprehensive Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anemia associated with cancer and cancer therapy is an important clinical and economic factor in the treatment of malignant diseases.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review to assess the efficacy of erythropoietin to prevent or treat anemia in cancer patients with regard to red blood cell transfusions, hematologic response, adverse events, and overall survival. We searched the Cochrane Library, Medline, EMBASE, and other databases for relevant articles published from January 1985 to December 2001. We included all randomized controlled trials that compared the use of recombinant human erythropoietin (plus transfusion, if needed) with no erythropoietin treatment (plus transfusion, if needed). Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated under a fixed-effects model. Clinical and statistical heterogeneity were examined with sensitivity analyses and meta-regression. Statistical tests for effect estimates were two-sided.

RESULTS

We identified 27 trials involving 3287 adult patients. Patients treated with erythropoietin had a lower relative risk of having a blood transfusion than untreated patients (RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.73). Erythropoietin-treated patients with baseline hemoglobin levels lower than 10 g/dL were more likely to have a hematologic response than untreated patients (RR = 3.60, 95% CI = 3.07 to 4.23). The relative risk for thromboembolic complications after erythropoietin treatment was not statistically significantly increased (RR = 1.58, 95% CI = 0.94 to 2.66) compared with that of untreated patients. There is suggestive but inconclusive evidence that erythropoietin may improve overall survival (adjusted data: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.99; unadjusted data: HR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.69 to 1.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Erythropoietin treatment may reduce the risk for blood transfusions and improve hematologic response in cancer patients. However, our favorable survival outcome is in contrast to two large (N = 351 and 939) recently published randomized controlled trials in which erythropoietin-treated patients had statistically significantly worse survival than untreated patients. Possible reasons for the disparity with our results include differences in study population and design, higher target hemoglobin levels and higher risk of thromboembolic complications, and concerns that erythropoietin may stimulate tumor growth.

Effects of recombinant erythropoietin in palliative treatment of unselected cancer patients

PURPOSE

The purpose is to evaluate relationships between objectively assessed exercise capacity and subjectively assessed scoring of physical functioning and well-being after erythropoietin treatment in cancer patients on palliative care.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Unselected cancer patients (n = 108) who experienced progressive cachexia were randomized to receive either anti-inflammatory treatment alone (indomethacin) or recombinant erythropoietin plus indomethacin to prevent the appearance of disease-induced anemia and thereby protect patients' exercise capacity. Follow-up investigations of nutritional status, exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life assessed by SF-36 and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 were compared.

RESULTS

Effective treatment by erythropoietin on top of basal whole body anti-inflammatory treatment was confirmed and indicated by time course changes of biochemical, physiologic, and nutritional objectives, whereas individual self-reported scoring of physical functioning and general health did not indicate a clear-cut effectiveness, particularly at moderately subnormal hemoglobin levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancies between objective and subjective self-reported measures may be either fundamental or indicate scoring limitations for evaluation of therapeutic results. Present results demonstrate a clinical benefit of erythropoietin treatment in cancer patients with subnormal to normal hemoglobin levels, whereas the patients' own subjective scoring was insufficient to sense such improvements. The discrepancy may be either fundamental or methodological but emphasizes the importance to document therapeutic outcome in both subjective and objective perspectives in palliative care of cancer patients.

Beneficial and ominous aspects of the pleiotropic action of erythropoietin

The primary function of the glycoprotein hormone erythropoietin (Epo) is to promote red cell production by inhibiting apoptosis of erythrocytic progenitors in hemopoietic tissues. However, functional Epo receptors (Epo-R) have recently been demonstrated in various nonhemopoietic tissues indicating that Epo is a more pleiotropic viability and growth factor. Herein, in vitro and in vivo effects of Epo in the brain and the cardiovascular system are reviewed. In addition, the therapeutic impact of Epo in oncology is considered, including the question of whether Epo might promote tumor growth. Convincing evidence is available that Epo acts as a neurotrophic and neuroprotective factor in the brain. Epo prevents neuronal cells from hypoxia-induced and glutamate-induced cell death. Epo-R is expressed by neurons and glia cells in specific regions of the brain. Epo supports the survival of neurons in the ischemic brain. The neuroprotective potential of Epo has already been confirmed in a clinical trial on patients with acute stroke. With respect to the vasculature, Epo acts on both endothelial and smooth muscle cells. Epo promotes angiogenesis and stimulates the production of endothelin and other vasoactive mediators. In addition, Epo-R is expressed by cardiomyocytes. The role of Epo as a myocardial protectant is at the focus of present research. Epo therapy in tumor patients is practiced primarily to maintain the hemoglobin concentration above the transfusion trigger and to reduce fatigue. In addition, increased tumor oxygenation may improve the efficacy of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, tumor cells often express Epo-R. Therefore, careful studies are required to fully exclude that recombinant human Epo (rHuEpo) promotes tumor growth.

Molecular biology of erythropoietin

The glycoprotein hormone erythropoietin (EPO) is an essential viability and growth factor for the erythrocytic progenitors. EPO is mainly produced in the kidneys. EPO gene expression is induced by hypoxia-inducible transcription factors (HIF). The principal representative of the HIF-family (HIF-1, -2 and -3) is HIF-1, which is composed of an O2-labile alpha-subunit and a constant nuclear beta-subunit. In normoxia, the alpha-subunit of HIF is inactivated following prolyl- and asparaginyl-hydroxylation by means of alpha-oxoglutarate and Fe(2+)-dependent HIF specific dioxygenases. While HIF-1 and HIF-2 activate the EPO gene, HIF-3, GATA-2 and NFkappaB are likely inhibitors of EPO gene transcription. EPO signalling involves tyrosine phosphorylation of the homodimeric EPO receptor and subsequent activation of intracellular antiapoptotic proteins, kinases and transcription factors. Lack of EPO leads to anemia. Treatment with recombinant human EPO (rHuEPO) is efficient and safe in improving the management of the anemia associated with chronic renal failure. RHuEPO analogues with prolonged survival in circulation have been developed. Whether the recent demonstration of EPO receptors in various non-hemopoietic tissues, including tumor cells, is welcome or ominous still needs to be clarified. Evidence suggests that rHuEPO may be a useful neuroprotective agent.

Epoetin Beta

Epoetin beta (NeoRecormon) is a recombinant form of erythropoietin. It increases reticulocyte counts, haemoglobin (Hb) levels and haematocrit. Epoetin beta administered subcutaneously once weekly corrected anaemia and had equivalent efficacy to that of epoetin beta administered three times weekly in patients with haematological malignancies. Subcutaneous epoetin beta reduced transfusion requirements and increased Hb levels versus no treatment in patients with solid tumours and chemotherapy-induced anaemia in nonblind, randomised trials. Anaemia and quality of life were also improved, and blood transfusion requirements were reduced to a significantly greater extent than placebo or no treatment (with supportive blood transfusion) in patients with haematological malignancies. Most patients were receiving chemotherapy. Subcutaneous epoetin beta was well tolerated by patients with cancer; adverse events with the drug occurred with a similar incidence to those with placebo or no treatment (with supportive blood transfusion). Hypertension was relatively uncommon with epoetin beta in clinical trials. Patients with haematological malignancies and a baseline platelet count > or =100 x 10(9)/L, Hb levels of > or =9 g/dL or lower erythropoietin levels have demonstrated better responses to epoetin beta than other patients in clinical trials. However, neither baseline erythropoietin level nor the observed to predicted ratio of erythropoietin levels correlated with the response to epoetin beta in patients with solid tumours and chemotherapy-induced anaemia. A decrease of <1 g/dL or an increase in Hb with epoetin beta during the first chemotherapy cycle indicated a low transfusion need in subsequent cycles in patients with ovarian carcinoma. In general, the efficacy of epoetin beta is not limited by tumour type. Response to the drug occurred irrespective of the nature (platinum- or nonplatinum-based) or presence of chemotherapy treatment in randomised trials.

CONCLUSION

Epoetin beta has shown efficacy in the management of cancer-related anaemia in patients with haematological malignancies and of chemotherapy-induced anaemia in patients with solid tumours. Once-weekly administration provides added convenience for patients and may be cost saving, although additional research into the potential pharmacoeconomic benefits of this regimen are required. The drug is well tolerated in patients with cancer and is associated with little injection-site pain when administered subcutaneously. Epoetin beta is an important option in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced anaemia, and a valid and valuable alternative to blood transfusion therapy for the treatment of cancer-related or chemotherapy-induced anaemia.

Health-related quality of life in non-small-cell lung cancer: methodologic issues in randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in both developed and developing countries, heavily impacts patient health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Although recent research has found many positive and significant steps in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which HRQOL has been used as an outcome, questions remain regarding methodologic quality and impact value of HRQOL outcome assessments in some RCTs. To date, no detailed systematic review exists of HRQOL methodology in NSCLC RCTs.

METHODS

A systematic review using Cochrane methodology evaluated HRQOL components in RCTs. Identified studies were evaluated independently by three reviewers on a broad set of predetermined criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine published RCTs (NSCLC patient samples total, N = 8445) with an HRQOL component were identified. Although most trials exhibited good-quality research and useful HRQOL and clinical data, the weaknesses identified in some trials include such common limitations as no clear hypothesis, lack of a clear approach to missing data and data analysis, and limited presentation of results.

CONCLUSION

Although it is clear that HRQOL is an important end point in NSCLC RCTs because the information helps to influence treatment recommendations, the identified weaknesses in conducting HRQOL measurement in NSCLC RCTs and the reporting of results need to be addressed.

Management of multiple myeloma: a systematic review and critical appraisal of published studies

We have done a systematic review of all randomised studies in myeloma, identified through a comprehensive search. Our aim was to investigate and critically examine the effects of various treatment modalities on outcome in patients with multiple myeloma and address 22 specific clinical questions in the management of this disease. As a result of our analysis we identified two therapeutic advances in the management of myeloma that, according to the evidence, are most important for improving outcome. These advances were: introduction of high dose chemotherapy, which appears to be superior to conventional chemotherapy, and the use of bisphosphonates, which decrease the probability of pathological vertebral fractures. However, the overall quality of the body of evidence for myeloma management was poor. Many trials were done with small sample sizes, and did not include reporting power analysis. The majority of studies had inadequate allocation concealment, and few were analysed according to intention to treat principle. We conclude that the quality of total evidence supporting treatment recommendations in myeloma is modest at best and has an ample scope for improvement.

Health related quality of life in prostate carcinoma patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Health related quality of life (HRQOL) is increasingly reported as an important endpoint in cancer clinical trials. However, evidence suggests that HRQOL reporting is often inadequate. Given this, the authors undertook a systematic review to evaluate HRQOL assessment methodology and reported outcomes of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) with prostate carcinoma patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the literature from 1980 to 2001, mainly on the following databases, was undertaken: MedLine, Cancerlit, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Studies were identified according to a predefined coding scheme, including HRQOL measure, cultural validity, compliance data reported and the clinical significance of the results.

RESULTS

Twenty-five RCTs were identified, involving 8015 patients primarily with metastatic cancer. Bicalutamide was the medical treatment against which most treatment comparisons were made. Limitations identified included the fact that only 44% of the studies gave a rationale for selecting a specific HRQOL measure, 64% of the studies failed to report information about the administration of the HRQOL measure, and 56% failed to report compliance at baseline. The measure most often used was the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Care 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), although some studies used non-validated HRQOL tools.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study revealed a lack of a uniform approach to HRQOL assessment and several methodologic limitations. It is possible that such methodologic limitations have influenced trial findings for HRQOL outcomes.

Pleiotrophic actions of erythropoietin

Erythropoietin is the prime regulator of red blood cell production. However, recent evidence suggests that the hormone has multiple effects outside the hematopoietic system. Functional receptors have been identified on a wide variety of normal and malignant cell types, and numerous biologic effects of the hormone on these cells have been observed both in vitro and in vivo. These findings are causing a reassessment of the understanding of erythropoietin physiology. Moreover, there are important implications for the use of recombinant erythropoietin in the clinical setting.

Multivariate regression analyses of data from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study confirm quality of life benefit of epoetin alfa in patients receiving non-platinum chemotherapy

Cancer-related anaemia is associated with a wide spectrum of symptoms that can negatively affect quality of life. Because epoetin alfa has demonstrated efficacy in correcting cancer-related anaemia, the impact of this treatment on quality of life was evaluated in a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 375 anaemic cancer patients receiving non-platinum-based chemotherapy. The cancer-specific measures of quality of life included the general scale (FACT-G Total) and fatigue subscale (FACT-An Fatigue subscale) of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anaemia and the Cancer Linear Analogue Scales measuring energy, ability to do daily activities, and overall quality of life. These measures were also used to examine the relationship between haemoglobin levels and quality of life. Both univariate and multiple linear regression analyses of quality of life data were performed. Results of the univariate analysis have been reported previously. The a priori-planned multiple linear regression analysis, which accounted for the effects of disease progression and several other possibly confounding variables on quality of life, showed a significant advantage for epoetin alfa over placebo for the five scales (all, P<0.05), and confirmed the results of the univariate analysis. For cancer-specific measures, significant correlations were demonstrated between baseline haemoglobin and quality of life (r, range: 0.14-0.26, all P<0.05) and between change in haemoglobin and change in quality of life (r, range: 0.26-0.34, all P<0.01). These findings provide evidence that increasing haemoglobin levels by epoetin alfa administration can significantly improve cancer patients' quality of life.

Erythropoietin, uncertainty principle and cancer related anaemia

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to evaluate if erythropoietin (EPO) is effective in the treatment of cancer related anemia, and if its effect remains unchanged when data are analyzed according to various clinical and methodological characteristics of the studies. We also wanted to demonstrate that cumulative meta-analysis (CMA) can be used to resolve uncertainty regarding clinical questions.

METHODS

Systematic Review (SR) of the published literature on the role of EPO in cancer-related anemia. A cumulative meta-analysis (CMA) using a conservative approach was performed to determine the point in time when uncertainty about the effect of EPO on transfusion-related outcomes could be considered resolved.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients included in randomized studies that compared EPO versus no therapy or placebo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of patients requiring transfusions.

RESULTS

Nineteen trials were included. The pooled results indicated a significant effect of EPO in reducing the number of patients requiring transfusions [odds ratio (OR) = 0.41; 95%CI: 0.33 to 0.5; p < 0.00001;relative risk (RR) = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.68]. The results remain unchanged after the sensitivity analyses were performed according to the various clinical and methodological characteristics of the studies. The heterogeneity was less pronounced when OR was used instead of RR as the measure of the summary point estimate. Analysis according to OR was not heterogeneous, but the pooled RR was highly heterogeneous. A stepwise metaregression analysis did point to the possibility that treatment effect could have been exaggerated by inadequacy in allocation concealment and that larger treatment effects are seen at hb level > 11.5 g/dl. We identified 1995 as the point in time when a statistically significant effect of EPO was demonstrated and after which we considered that uncertainty about EPO efficacy was resolved.

CONCLUSION

EPO is effective in the treatment of anemia in cancer patients. This could have already been known in 1995 if a CMA had been performed at that time.

Health related quality of life assessment methodology and reported outcomes in randomised controlled trials of primary brain cancer patients

Over the last 20 years, the assessment of quality of life (QOL) has become an important endpoint in cancer clinical trials, helping us to understand patient survival and QOL experiences and aiding clinicians in providing the best possible treatment and care, with the least toxicity and ill-effects. In primary brain cancer, these are critical issues. Survival is often limited and treatment difficult to tolerate. In recent years, some authors have questioned the methodological quality of the investigations and the reporting of QOL assessments from randomised controlled trials (RCTs), of cancer patients yet this assessment has never specifically focused on brain cancer. This paper therefore reports a systematic review of the research methodology and QOL assessment reporting in brain cancer patients in RCTs. The search was mainly performed on the following databases: Medline, Cancerlit and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. We identified only five RCTs, enrolling a total of 1026 patients. In many of these studies, we had identified methodological limitations which would hinder the interpretation of the results. These included a lack of detailed reporting regarding missing data, use of poorly validated tools, and general limitations regarding the presentation and interpretation of the results. Based on the results of our review, we make recommendations for future investigations to avoid these shortcomings.