1
|
Ottesen JA, Tong E, Emblem KE, Latysheva A, Zaharchuk G, Bjørnerud A, Grøvik E. Semi-Supervised Learning Allows for Improved Segmentation With Reduced Annotations of Brain Metastases Using Multicenter MRI Data. J Magn Reson Imaging 2025; 61:2469-2479. [PMID: 39792624 PMCID: PMC12063759 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2024] [Revised: 12/03/2024] [Accepted: 12/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep learning-based segmentation of brain metastases relies on large amounts of fully annotated data by domain experts. Semi-supervised learning offers potential efficient methods to improve model performance without excessive annotation burden. PURPOSE This work tests the viability of semi-supervision for brain metastases segmentation. STUDY TYPE Retrospective. SUBJECTS There were 156, 65, 324, and 200 labeled scans from four institutions and 519 unlabeled scans from a single institution. All subjects included in the study had diagnosed with brain metastases. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES 1.5 T and 3 T, 2D and 3D T1-weighted pre- and post-contrast, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR). ASSESSMENT Three semi-supervision methods (mean teacher, cross-pseudo supervision, and interpolation consistency training) were adapted with the U-Net architecture. The three semi-supervised methods were compared to their respective supervised baseline on the full and half-sized training. STATISTICAL TESTS Evaluation was performed on a multinational test set from four different institutions using 5-fold cross-validation. Method performance was evaluated by the following: the number of false-positive predictions, the number of true positive predictions, the 95th Hausdorff distance, and the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Significance was tested using a paired samples t test for a single fold, and across all folds within a given cohort. RESULTS Semi-supervision outperformed the supervised baseline for all sites with the best-performing semi-supervised method achieved an on average DSC improvement of 6.3% ± 1.6%, 8.2% ± 3.8%, 8.6% ± 2.6%, and 15.4% ± 1.4%, when trained on half the dataset and 3.6% ± 0.7%, 2.0% ± 1.5%, 1.8% ± 5.7%, and 4.7% ± 1.7%, compared to the supervised baseline on four test cohorts. In addition, in three of four datasets, the semi-supervised training produced equal or better results than the supervised models trained on twice the labeled data. DATA CONCLUSION Semi-supervised learning allows for improved segmentation performance over the supervised baseline, and the improvement was particularly notable for independent external test sets when trained on small amounts of labeled data. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Artificial intelligence requires extensive datasets with large amounts of annotated data from medical experts which can be difficult to acquire due to the large workload. To compensate for this, it is possible to utilize large amounts of un-annotated clinical data in addition to annotated data. However, this method has not been widely tested for the most common intracranial brain tumor, brain metastases. This study shows that this approach allows for data efficient deep learning models across multiple institutions with different clinical protocols and scanners. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon André Ottesen
- Computational Radiology and Artificial Intelligence (CRAI) Research Group, Division of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural SciencesUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Elizabeth Tong
- Department of RadiologyStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Kyrre Eeg Emblem
- Department of Physics and Computational Radiology, Division of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Anna Latysheva
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Greg Zaharchuk
- Department of RadiologyStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Atle Bjørnerud
- Computational Radiology and Artificial Intelligence (CRAI) Research Group, Division of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural SciencesUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Endre Grøvik
- Department of RadiologyÅlesund Hospital, Møre og Romsdal Hospital TrustÅlesundNorway
- Department of PhysicsNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lu C, Yan HH, Zhang CY, Chen SY, Li YS, Wang BC, Xu CR, Tu HY, Zhong WZ, Zhou Q, Zhang XC, Wu YL, Feng WN, Jiang GM, Yang JJ. PEARL: A Multicenter Phase 2 Study of Lorlatinib in Patients with ALK-Rearranged NSCLC and Central Nervous System Disease. Clin Lung Cancer 2025; 26:263-266. [PMID: 39721825 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2024] [Revised: 11/23/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (ALK+ NSCLC) with symptomatic brain (BM) and leptomeningeal (LM) metastases are underrepresented in clinical trials due to poor performance status. Additionally, the need for improved and validated assessment criteria for evaluating central nervous system (CNS) response remains critical. Lorlatinib has demonstrated systemic activity in patients with ALK+ NSCLC. This ongoing phase II study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lorlatinib in ALK+ NSCLC patients with progressive CNS metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study is a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, prospective trial. Fifty eligible subjects will be divided into 2 cohorts: BM (progressive or new brain parenchymal; n = 30) and LM (positive cerebrospinal fluid cytology and/or MRI ± brain parenchymal metastasis; n = 20). Key inclusion criteria include ALK status confirmed using FDA-approved tests, at least 1 CNS lesion, with or without CNS-related symptoms, and an ECOG performance status of 0-2 for the BM cohort and 0-3 for the LM cohort. Primary endpoint is intracranial objective response rate based on the modified version of response evaluation criteria in solid tumors v1.1 for BM and modified RANO-LM criteria for LM. Key secondary endpoints include intracranial progression-free survival, overall progression-free survival, objective response rate, overall survival, safety and quality of life. Biomarker analysis of paired pretreatment tumor, blood and optional cerebrospinal fluid will be performed as preplanned exploratory analyses. CONCLUSIONS The PEARL study (CTONG2303) will evaluate efficacy of lorlatinib in CNS metastases in ALK+ NSCLC using refined CNS response evaluation criteria, with biomarker analyses providing insights into response and resistance mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Lu
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hong-Hong Yan
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chan-Yuan Zhang
- Department of Pulmonary Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China
| | - Shi-Yuan Chen
- Tenth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University (Dongguan people's hospital), Dongguan, China
| | - Yang-Si Li
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bin-Chao Wang
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chong-Rui Xu
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hai-Yan Tu
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wen-Zhao Zhong
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qing Zhou
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xu-Chao Zhang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi-Long Wu
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei-Neng Feng
- Department of Pulmonary Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China
| | - Guan-Ming Jiang
- Tenth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University (Dongguan people's hospital), Dongguan, China
| | - Jin-Ji Yang
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gaeta B, Eichholz JE, Walch H, Ilica AT, Boe L, Kratochvil L, Yu Y, Gomez DR, Imber BS, Li BT, Murciano-Goroff YR, Arbour KC, Schultz N, Lebow ES, Pike LRG. Intracranial Disease Control and Survival among Patients with KRAS-mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma and Brain Metastases Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2025; 122:424-434. [PMID: 39929348 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.01.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2024] [Revised: 01/14/2025] [Accepted: 01/25/2025] [Indexed: 03/01/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Precision medicine according to molecularly defined subgroups offers great potential to improve outcomes for patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. This study describes clinical outcomes and the impact of co-occurring genetic alterations on outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) among patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS)-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 195 patients with KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma were treated with SRS for brain metastases (BMs) between 2014 and 2018 with follow-up until 2022 or death. Coprimary outcomes were median overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS); univariable and multivariable Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used. RESULTS Median follow-up from the date of BM diagnosis was 11 months. Median OS and iPFS for the cohort were 27.7 months (95% CI, 19.7-36.8) and 22.1 months (95% CI, 16.8-48.9), respectively. Lesion-level local control at 12 and 24 months was 89.9% and 87.5%, respectively. In a multivariable Cox regression model, inferior OS was associated with coalterations in KEAP1 and STK11 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.94; 95% CI, 1.04-3.62; q = 0.087), progressive (HR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.38-8.39; q = 0.087), and mixed response (HR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.2-10.3; q = 0.092) extracranial disease, and 6 or more BMs at time of diagnosis (HR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.22-6.63; q = 0.087). Positive programmed death ligand 1 status was associated with improved OS (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37-0.87; P = .01). Inferior iPFS was associated with chemotherapy before SRS (HR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.42-5.09; q = 0.04) and age >65 years (HR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.25-3.93; q = 0.055). KRAS G12C was not associated with differences in iPFS, OS, or type of intracranial progression event following SRS. CONCLUSIONS Coalteration of KRAS and KEAP1/STK11 was associated with inferior OS, but not iPFS. Similar outcomes were found in patients harboring KRAS G12C and non-G12C mutant non-small cell lung cancer BMs. Further understanding of molecularly characterized subgroups will be critical in driving personalized radiation therapy for patients with lung cancer BMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Gaeta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Jordan E Eichholz
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Henry Walch
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ahmet T Ilica
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lillian Boe
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Leah Kratochvil
- Memorial Hospital Research Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Global Biomarker Development Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Brandon S Imber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bob T Li
- Memorial Hospital Research Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yonina R Murciano-Goroff
- Memorial Hospital Research Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kathryn C Arbour
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nikolaus Schultz
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Emily S Lebow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Global Biomarker Development Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Luke R G Pike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Global Biomarker Development Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tos SM, Mantziaris G, Shaaban A, Pikis S, Dumot C, Sheehan JP. Stereotactic Radiosurgery Dose Reduction for Melanoma Brain Metastases Patients on Immunotherapy or Target Therapy: A Single-Center Experience. Neurosurgery 2025; 96:1307-1320. [PMID: 39465916 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 09/06/2024] [Indexed: 10/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Better local control but higher rates of adverse radiation events (ARE) have been reported when combining American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO)-guideline-suggested dose (SD) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with immunotherapy or targeted therapy for melanoma brain metastases. The objective of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of lower prescription doses compared with ASTRO guidelines for single-fraction SRS for patients with melanoma metastases who are concurrently receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, single-center study on 194 patients who underwent SRS between 2009 and 2022. After propensity score matching, 71 patients with 292 metastases were included in the ASTRO-SD (20-24 Gy for <2 cm, 18 Gy for ≥2 to <3 cm) group and 33 patients with 292 metastases in the reduced dose (RD, <20 Gy for <2 cm, <18 Gy for ≥2 to <3 cm) group. RESULTS The median diameter (5.4 vs 5.2 mm, P = .6), prescription volume (0.2 vs 0.2 cm 3 , P = .2), and radiographic follow-up (11 vs 12 months, P = .2) were similar in the 2 groups. The cumulative incidence of progressing metastases was significantly higher in the SD compared with the RD group ( P = .018). Higher prescription volumes and ASTRO-suggested radiation doses were associated with local progression in multivariable analysis. Radiographic AREs were significantly more common in the SD compared with the RD group (8.6% vs 3.1%, P = .005). BRAF and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors' concurrent use, higher prescription volumes, and ASTRO-suggested radiation doses were associated with an increased risk of radiographic ARE. CONCLUSION This study provides evidence that RD SRS could offer reduced toxicity rates, while maintaining high local control as compared with the current guideline-SDs for the treatment of melanoma brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salem M Tos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| | - Georgios Mantziaris
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| | - Ahmed Shaaban
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| | - Stylianos Pikis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| | - Chloe Dumot
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon , France
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Samanci Y, Aydin S, Düzkalir AH, Askeroglu MO, Peker S. Upfront frameless hypofractionated gamma knife radiosurgery for large posterior Fossa metastases. Neurosurg Rev 2025; 48:418. [PMID: 40372490 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-025-03572-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2025] [Revised: 04/23/2025] [Accepted: 05/06/2025] [Indexed: 05/16/2025]
Abstract
The management of large metastatic brain tumors (METs), particularly those in the posterior fossa (pf-METs), is challenging. While surgery can alleviate symptoms, it carries the risk of complications such as leptomeningeal disease (LMD). Upfront hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery (hf-GKRS) has shown promise as an alternative approach for managing large METs. This study assesses the efficacy and safety of upfront hf-GKRS for treatment-naïve large pf-METs. In this retrospective, single-center study, 40 patients with 42 pf-METs received hf-GKRS from October 2017 to June 2024. Patients eligible for the study were 18 years or older, had histologically confirmed malignancy, large pf-METs (> 4 cm3), and a minimum of two follow-up MRI scans. The primary outcome was local control (LC), with secondary assessments of distant intracranial failure (DICF), intracranial progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. LC was achieved in 88.1% of pf-METs over a median follow-up of 6 months (mean: 13.7 months). LC rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 95.8%, 95.8%, and 74.5%, respectively. Local failure (LF) occurred in 11.9% of cases, with a median recurrence time of 12 months. DICF was noted in 35% of patients, while no cases of LMD were reported. Intracranial PFS rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 54.1%, 39.0%, and 16.7%, respectively, with a median PFS of 8 months. Symptomatic hydrocephalus developed in one patient (2.5%). Controlled primary tumor status (HR: 0.17, p = 0.036) was significantly associated with lower risk of death, while no other parameters were predictive of LC, DICF, or intracranial PFS. hf-GKRS demonstrates strong efficacy and safety as a primary treatment for selected, treatment-naïve large pf-METs over a relatively short follow-up duration. Further studies are warranted to refine patient selection, fractionation, and dosing strategies for this challenging population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yavuz Samanci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Türkiye Davutpasa Caddesi No:4, Zeytinburnu/İstanbul, 34010, Türkiye
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gamma Knife Center, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Serhat Aydin
- Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Ali Haluk Düzkalir
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gamma Knife Center, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - M Orbay Askeroglu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gamma Knife Center, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Selcuk Peker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Türkiye Davutpasa Caddesi No:4, Zeytinburnu/İstanbul, 34010, Türkiye.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gamma Knife Center, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Salbas A, Koc AM, Coskun M, Horoz EM, Sengul A, Gelal MF. Temporal evolution of MRI findings and survival outcomes in patients with brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery. BMC Med Imaging 2025; 25:161. [PMID: 40369456 PMCID: PMC12080185 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-025-01713-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2025] [Accepted: 05/06/2025] [Indexed: 05/16/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to investigate the temporal evolution of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in brain metastases following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and their correlation with treatment response and survival outcomes. By analyzing volumetric changes in tumor size, perilesional edema, and necrotic components, we seek to identify imaging biomarkers that predict prognosis and treatment efficacy. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 97 patients (200 metastatic lesions) who underwent SRS for brain metastases between 2010 and 2022. Multiparametric MRI (MPMRI) scans were analyzed at four distinct follow-up periods: 1 to 3 months, 3 to 8 months, 8 to 16 months, and 16 to 24 months post-SRS. Volumetric measurements of tumor size, perilesional edema, and necrosis were obtained using semi-automated segmentation. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) ratios were also assessed. Statistical analyses, including Kaplan-Meier survival curves and ROC analysis, were performed to determine prognostic imaging biomarkers. RESULTS The most significant reduction in tumor and perilesional edema volume occurred within the first 1 to 3 months post-SRS and continued until the 8th month. A transient increase in lesion size (pseudoprogression) was observed in 31.5% of cases, predominantly between 3 and 8 months post-SRS. Pretreatment tumor volume was found to be significantly associated with treatment response. ROC analysis identified 1.22 cm³ as the optimal cutoff value for differentiating between Group A (good response) and Group B (poor response) lesions (AUC = 0.754, sensitivity = 87.0%, specificity = 57.1%). Survival analysis revealed that higher pretreatment tumor volume, larger necrotic volume, and extensive perilesional edema were associated with shorter survival times (p < 0.05). No significant association was found between survival and ADC or rCBV. CONCLUSION Following SRS, early reductions in tumor and edema volume were observed, while 31.5% of cases showed transient enlargement. Smaller tumors responded better to SRS, whereas larger volume, extensive edema, and necrosis were linked to shorter survival. Given the high rate of pseudoprogression, not every post-treatment size increase indicates true progression. A wait-and-see approach may help avoid unnecessary interventions in selected cases. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Salbas
- Department of Radiology, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, 35150, Turkey.
| | - Ali Murat Koc
- Department of Radiology, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, 35150, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Coskun
- Department of Radiology, University of Health Science Dr. Behcet Uz Children Disease and Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, 35100, Turkey
| | - Emine Merve Horoz
- Department of Radiology, Izmir Democracy University, Izmir, 35140, Turkey
| | - Adem Sengul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, 35150, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Fazil Gelal
- Department of Radiology, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, 35150, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pignatti F, Herold R, Demolis P, Rohr UP. Novel PET RANO BM 1.0 criteria: Regulatory perspectives on new endpoint definitions in brain metastases. Neuro Oncol 2025:noaf067. [PMID: 40338144 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaf067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2025] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ralf Herold
- The European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pierre Demolis
- Lyfjastofnun-Icelandic Medicines Agency, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xing P, Pu X, Zhou Y, Liu Z, Yao Y, Liu J, Wang S, Hu Y, Li J, Wu L. Efficacy and safety of dacomitinib in treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC and brain metastasis: a multicenter cohort study. Oncologist 2025; 30:oyaf079. [PMID: 40349136 PMCID: PMC12065940 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The data for dacomitinib, a second-generation EGFR-TKI, treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastasis was lacking. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of dacomitinib in treating EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC with brain metastasis in first-line settings. METHODS Eligible patients were treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC patients with ≥1 brain metastasis no less than 5 mm treated with dacomitinib. The primary endpoint was intracranial objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included intracranial and extracranial progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), intracranial and extracranial ORR, disease control rate (DCR), and safety. The response was evaluated per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and RANO-BM (Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases) criteria. RESULT Between July 2nd, 2019, and September 30th, 2022, a total of 87 treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC and brain metastasis treated with dacomitinib from four hospitals were included. The data cutoff date was March 24th, 2023, and the median duration of follow-up time was 17.5 months (range 1.6-34.7 months). Based on mRECIST criteria, for all the 87 patients with evaluable brain metastasis, the iORR was 89.7% (95%CI, 81.3%-95.2%) and iDCR was 97.7% (95%CI, 91.9-99.7%), with 42 patients achieving CR, 36 patients achieving PR, and 7 patients maintaining SD. Based on RANO-BM criteria, the iORR was 71.3% (62/87, 95%CI 60.6%-80.5%) and iDCR was 97.7% (85/87, 95%CI, 91.9%-99.7%), with 42 patients achieving CR, 20 patients achieving PR, and 23 patients maintaining SD (Table). Median iPFS was 26.0 (95%CI, 20.7-31.4) months, and the 1-year and 2-year iPFS rate were 68.9% and 51.5%, respectively. Of 75 patients with evaluable extracranial lesions, 2 patients achieved CR (2.7%), the systemic ORR was 73.8% (95%CI 63.1%-82.8%) and DCR was 96.4% (89.9%-99.3%) (Table). Systemic median PFS was 14.0 (95%CI 11.1-16.9) months and median OS was 34.0 (95%CI 28.0-39.9) months. Overall, 86 of 87 (98.9%) patients experienced adverse events (AEs) of any grade. The most common (≥20%) AEs including rash (89.7%), oral ulcer (74.2%), diarrhea (67.8%), and paronychia (59.8%). Most of the AEs were grade 1 or grade 2 and no patients died due to severe AEs. CONCLUSIONS Dacomitinib showed promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile for advanced NSCLC with brain metastasis harboring EGFR mutation in the first-line treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puyuan Xing
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xingxiang Pu
- The Second Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University/Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013,People’s Republic of China
| | - Yu Zhou
- The Second Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University/Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013,People’s Republic of China
| | - Ziling Liu
- Department of Oncology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130031, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yu Yao
- Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, 710061, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jiayu Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shouzheng Wang
- The Department of Oncology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Beijing, 101149, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ying Hu
- The Department of Oncology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Beijing, 101149, People’s Republic of China
| | - Junling Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lin Wu
- The Second Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University/Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013,People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Crouzen JA, Zindler JD, Mast ME, Kleijnen JJE, Versluis MC, Hashimzadah M, Kiderlen M, van der Voort van Zyp NCMG, Broekman MLD, Petoukhova AL. Local recurrence and radionecrosis after single-isocenter multiple targets stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases. Sci Rep 2025; 15:15722. [PMID: 40325083 PMCID: PMC12053608 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-01034-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2025] [Accepted: 05/02/2025] [Indexed: 05/07/2025] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is frequently used to treat brain metastases (BMs). The single-isocenter for multiple targets (SIMT) technique allows for faster treatment of large numbers of BMs, but may adversely affect planning target volume (PTV) coverage due to possible increased positioning uncertainties with an increased isocenter to tumor distance (ITD). This study aims to investigate the association of ITD with local recurrence (LR) and radionecrosis (RN). Patients treated with SRT using a single isocenter for multiple BMs were retrospectively analyzed. Previous cranial radiotherapy and inability to undergo MR imaging were exclusion criteria. Patients were irradiated using a Versa HD LINAC with 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) energy and a 6D robotic couch. A non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc technique was used and plans were delivered using 6MV FFF energy. Associations between potential risk factors and LR/RN were investigated with Cox regression analyses. Seventy-five patients with a total of 357 BMs were included. Median survival after SRT was nine months. LR occurred in 7 (9%) patients and 10 (13%) had RN. After 18 months, LR-free survival was 89% and RN-free survival was 85%, respectively. ITD was not significantly associated with LR and RN. GTV was significantly associated with both LR (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.17, P 0.0079) and RN (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17, P 0.020). LINAC-based SIMT SRT is a safe and effective treatment modality for patients with multiple BMs. We found no increased risk of LR or RN for BMs located further away from the isocenter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Crouzen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - J D Zindler
- Department of Radiotherapy, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands.
- Department of Radiotherapy, HollandPTC, Huismansingel 4, 2629 JH, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - M E Mast
- Department of Radiotherapy, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - J J E Kleijnen
- Department of Medical Physics, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - M C Versluis
- Department of Radiotherapy, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - M Hashimzadah
- Department of Radiotherapy, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - M Kiderlen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | | | - M L D Broekman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A L Petoukhova
- Department of Medical Physics, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Albert NL, Galldiks N, Ellingson BM, van den Bent MJ, Chang SM, Cicone F, Koh ES, Law I, Le Rhun E, Mair MJ, Werner JM, Berghoff AS, Furtner J, Minniti G, Scott AM, Short SC, Ivanidze J, Johnson DR, Suchorska B, Tolboom N, Tonn JC, Verger A, Galanis E, Brastianos PK, Wen PY, Weller M, Lin NU, Preusser M. RANO criteria for response assessment of brain metastases based on amino acid PET imaging. Nat Med 2025; 31:1424-1430. [PMID: 40341837 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-025-03633-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2025] [Indexed: 05/11/2025]
Abstract
Novel diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities are needed to improve medical care and outcome of patients with brain metastases, a frequent and severe complication of several cancer types. Currently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the primary method used for detection, treatment planning and disease monitoring in patients with brain metastases, but this method has limitations. These limitations mean that MRI can inform on lesion size but cannot directly measure the activity or viability of tumor tissue. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, however, can visualize metabolically active tumor cells and is therefore increasingly incorporated into cancer care to assess tumor burden and response to treatment. Here, we define the PET Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) for brain metastasis (BM) 1.0 criteria for metabolic response assessment of brain metastases using amino acid PET. By introducing an innovative endpoint for next-generation clinical trials, the PET RANO BM 1.0 criteria aim to facilitate development of novel therapies for patients with brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- The Brain Tumour Center at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Francesco Cicone
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, 'Magna Græcia' University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Eng-Siew Koh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maximilian J Mair
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan-Michael Werner
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, Cologne, Germany
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anna S Berghoff
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Julia Furtner
- Research Center for Medical Image Analysis and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan C Short
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, the University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jana Ivanidze
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Derek R Johnson
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bogdana Suchorska
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nelleke Tolboom
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Antoine Verger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU Nancy and IADI INSERM UMR 1254, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Eva Galanis
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Priscilla K Brastianos
- Krantz Center for Cancer Research, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gal O, Mehta MP, Kotecha R. The role of upfront radiation therapy for brain metastases in the era of CNS-active systemic therapies: a narrative review of clinical trial design and lessons learned. J Neurooncol 2025; 173:11-19. [PMID: 39961938 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-025-04970-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2025] [Accepted: 02/06/2025] [Indexed: 04/30/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Systemic therapies are increasingly being considered as primary treatments for brain metastases (BM), deferring the upfront use of local treatment modalities. However, evidence to support this paradigm shift is difficult to interpret given the volume of data published and the intricacies of the outcomes reported. The objective of this narrative review is to evaluate the current evidence guiding treatment selection for BM patients by assembling and analyzing a detailed dataset of clinical trials, completed and published during the last two decades. METHODS Obstacles in interpreting the results of prospective systemic therapy clinical trials are detailed, including non-standardized study cohorts, inconsistent use of response assessment criteria, insufficient endpoint definition for central nervous system (CNS) efficacy, and under-reporting of previous radiotherapy. The paucity of prospective data to guide radiation therapy options is also addressed, and caveats of the available published evidence are detailed. RESULTS Proposed treatment and follow-up recommendations for patient with newly diagnosed BM are provided based on currently available evidence. CONCLUSION Prospective trials evaluating contemporary treatment paradigms and defining the respective roles of systemic and local therapies are eagerly awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omer Gal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, 8900 N Kendall Dr, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, 8900 N Kendall Dr, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, 8900 N Kendall Dr, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, 8900 N Kendall Dr, Miami, FL, 33176, USA.
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, 8900 N Kendall Dr, Miami, FL, 33176, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang Z, Hong H. Anti‑HER2‑targeted therapies for the treatment of advanced HER2‑positive breast cancer with brain metastases (Review). Mol Clin Oncol 2025; 22:45. [PMID: 40170686 PMCID: PMC11959222 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2025.2840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2025] [Indexed: 04/03/2025] Open
Abstract
Compared with other metastatic sites, breast cancer brain metastases (BCBMs) are associated with the shortest survival time. In addition, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is observed to be amplified in 20-25% of breast cancer cases where it is a poor prognostic factor for brain metastases. Various anti-HER2 targeted therapies have brought both new opportunities and challenges to patients with HER2-positive BCBM over the past decade. However, prolonging survival time and improving quality of life of patients have become controversial issues in the field of clinical research on BCBMs. On the basis of the latest literature, the present review documents the anti-HER2 targeted drugs applied in patients with HER2-positive BCBM. Further studies on the efficacy and safety of novel HER2-targeted drugs and combined or sequential therapy in clinical treatment are expected to provide more effective strategies for the treatment of patients with HER2-positive BCBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhangyan Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China
| | - Huangming Hong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ahmed KA, Kim Y, Kim S, Wang MH, DeJesus M, Arrington JA, Soyano AE, Armaghani AJ, Costa RLB, Loftus LS, Rosa M, Caudell JJ, Diaz R, Etame AB, Tran ND, Soliman H, Czerniecki BJ, Forsyth PA, Yu HHM, Han HS. Nivolumab and stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with breast cancer brain metastases: long-term results and biomarker analysis from a non-randomized, open-label, phase Ib study. J Immunother Cancer 2025; 13:e011432. [PMID: 40295143 PMCID: PMC12039042 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2024-011432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/17/2025] [Indexed: 04/30/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We hypothesized treatment with nivolumab and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) would be feasible, well tolerated, and may improve intracranial tumor control over SRS alone for breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). METHODS The study is a phase Ib trial of nivolumab and SRS for BCBM. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION NCT03807765. Key eligibility criteria include BCBM of all subtypes, age ≥18, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performace Status (ECOG-PS)≤2 with ≤10 brain metastases. Treatment was initiated with a dose of nivolumab (480 mg intravenously) that was repeated every 4 weeks. The initial dose of nivolumab was followed 1 week later by SRS. Blood was collected at baseline and every 4 weeks for flow cytometry and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) assessment. RESULTS A total of 12 patients received SRS to 17 brain metastases. Breast cancer subtypes included triple negative (50%), hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- (33%), and HR-/HER2+ (17%). Median follow-up from start of protocol therapy is 56 months. No cases of radionecrosis were noted. Two lesions were noted to undergo local failure, both pathologically confirmed, for a 12-month local control of 94%. Median distant intracranial control was 7.4 months with a 12-month control rate of 33%. Median systemic progression-free survival was 7.7 months with a 12-month rate of 42%. Median overall survival (OS) was 24.7 months with a 12-month OS of 75%. Most patients were noted to have an increase in cfDNA throughout study treatment, at week 5 compared with baseline (83%), week 25 compared with baseline (89%), and 100% at first follow-up. Intracranial control was associated with lower levels of CD4 regulatory T cells (Treg) (p=0.03) and higher levels of CD4 T effector memory (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS Nivolumab and SRS is a safe and feasible treatment option in BCBM. Long-term follow-up revealed no cases of radiation necrosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03807765.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamran A Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Younchul Kim
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Sungjune Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville Campus, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Min Hsuan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Michelle DeJesus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - John A Arrington
- Department of Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Aixa E Soyano
- Department of Breast Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Avan J Armaghani
- Department of Breast Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Ricardo L B Costa
- Department of Breast Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Loretta S Loftus
- Department of Breast Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Marilin Rosa
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Jimmy J Caudell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Roberto Diaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Arnold B Etame
- Department of Neuro Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Nam D Tran
- Department of Neuro Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Hatem Soliman
- Department of Breast Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Brian J Czerniecki
- Department of Breast Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Peter A Forsyth
- Department of Neuro Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | | - Hyo S Han
- Department of Breast Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dwarshuis G, Kroon LL, Brandsma D, Noske DP, Best MG, Sol N. Liquid biopsies for the monitoring of gliomas and brain metastases in adults. Acta Neuropathol 2025; 149:37. [PMID: 40285800 PMCID: PMC12033197 DOI: 10.1007/s00401-025-02880-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2025] [Revised: 04/11/2025] [Accepted: 04/12/2025] [Indexed: 04/29/2025]
Abstract
Clinical evaluation and MR imaging are currently the cornerstone of brain tumor progression monitoring. However, this is complicated by the occurrence of treatment effects such as pseudoprogression and radionecrosis. While essential for patient management, the distinction from true progression remains a significant challenge. Moreover, MR imaging provides limited real-time insights into tumor heterogeneity, genetic divergence, and treatment resistance. Although surgical histopathological biopsies can yield additional valuable information, they are not always conclusive, invasive, and therefore, not suitable for longitudinal measurements. In the era of precision medicine, there is a critical need for minimally invasive, accurate, and cost-effective monitoring methods for both primary brain tumors and brain metastases. Liquid biopsies have emerged as a potential candidate. Various analytes, including circulating nucleic acids, extracellular vesicles, platelet RNAs, and circulating tumor cells, can be obtained from whole blood and its derivatives, as well as other body fluids such as cerebrospinal fluid. In this narrative review, we outline the potential of liquid biopsies for the management of gliomas and brain metastases in adults and emphasize their utility in monitoring disease progression and treatment response. We discuss the most studied biofluids and analytes, along with their respective advantages and downsides. Furthermore, we address key considerations for future research and biobanking to pave the way for clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Govert Dwarshuis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lente L Kroon
- Department of Neurology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dieta Brandsma
- Department of Neurology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David P Noske
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Myron G Best
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nik Sol
- Department of Neurology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Luo S, Chai J, Ding L, Tang S. Excellent efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan in a patient with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer complicated by pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis: a case report and literature review. Front Pharmacol 2025; 16:1574286. [PMID: 40371348 PMCID: PMC12076521 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1574286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2025] [Accepted: 03/26/2025] [Indexed: 05/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd or DS-8201), as a novel antibody-drug conjugate, has demonstrated good efficacy in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. However, its effectiveness in treating pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis (PLC) has not been previously reported. This paper presents a case of a HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patient who experienced disease progression after treatment with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. The patient developed multiple metastases along with PLC and subsequently received T-DXd treatment, achieving 14.2 months of progression-free survival (PFS). This case is the first to reveal the therapeutic potential of T-DXd in breast cancer patients with PLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simin Luo
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jie Chai
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Linxiaoxiao Ding
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Song Tang
- The Second Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Perron R, Iorio-Morin C, Chytka T, Simonova G, Chiang V, Singh C, Niranjan A, Wei Z, Lunsford LD, Peker S, Samanci Y, Peterson J, Ross R, Rusthoven CG, Lee CC, Yang HC, Yener U, Sheehan J, Kondziolka D, Mathieu D. International multicenter study of stereotactic radiosurgery for bladder cancer brain metastases. J Neurooncol 2025:10.1007/s11060-025-05039-4. [PMID: 40249513 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-025-05039-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/06/2025] [Indexed: 04/19/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Bladder cancer rarely metastasizes to the brain. This study was performed to evaluate stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the management of bladder cancer brain metastases. METHODS Cases of bladder cancer brain metastases treated with SRS were collected by members of the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation (IRRF) and outcome data was analyzed for patients with at least one clinical or imaging follow-up. RESULTS 103 patients received SRS for 301 brain metastases. Median age at SRS was 68 and 73.8% of patients were male. Median KPS was 80%. Median time from primary to brain metastases diagnosis was 18 months. At the time of SRS, 50% of patients had other systemic metastases. The median number of metastases treated was 1, and median cumulative SRS volume was 1.16 cc. Most patients had single fraction SRS using a median margin dose of 18 Gy. At the time of analysis, 9.7% of patients were alive. Median survival after SRS was 7 months. Local control was achieved for 89.3% of metastases, 42% of patients developed new remote brain metastases, and 4.9% had leptomeningeal dissemination. Subsequent management included repeat SRS in 21.7%, surgical resection in 8.8% and WBRT in 7.6% of patients. At last follow-up, 32.1% of patients had improvement of their symptoms, whereas 38.5% remained stable. Adverse radiation effects occurred in 4.3% of treated metastases. On multivariate analyses, KPS ≥ 80% and non-urothelial histology predicted improved survival, while absence of corticosteroid intake predicted longer tumor control. CONCLUSION Bladder cancer brain metastases can be safely managed with SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rémi Perron
- Division of Neurosurgery, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Qc, Canada
| | - Christian Iorio-Morin
- Division of Neurosurgery, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Qc, Canada
| | - Tomas Chytka
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Gabriela Simonova
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Veronica Chiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Charu Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Zhishuo Wei
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Selcuk Peker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yavuz Samanci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jennifer Peterson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Richard Ross
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Chad G Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ulas Yener
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Mathieu
- Division of Neurosurgery, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Qc, Canada.
- Service de neurochirurgie, CHUS, 12 e avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Qc, 3001, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rashid NS, Lamba N, Catalano PJ, Elhalawani H, Tanguturi SK, Rahman R, Haas-Kogan DA, Wen PY, Aizer AA. Impact of brain metastasis size at the time of radiotherapy on local control and radiation necrosis. J Neurooncol 2025:10.1007/s11060-025-05023-y. [PMID: 40232621 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-025-05023-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2025] [Accepted: 03/22/2025] [Indexed: 04/16/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE No consensus has been reached regarding whether upfront versus deferred radiation to small, asymptomatic brain metastases is most optimal. We sought to assess the relationship between tumor size at radiation and subsequent development of local recurrence and radiation necrosis to make data-driven recommendations regarding timing of radiation utilization. METHODS We identified 2268 patients with 6308 newly diagnosed brain metastases between 2010 and 2022 managed with brain-directed radiotherapy at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA). Tumors were grouped by maximal unidimensional size: <0.5 cm, 0.5 to < 1 cm, 1 cm to < 2 cm, and ≥ 2 cm; local recurrence and radiation necrosis by tumor size were assessed using competing risks regression. RESULTS Among metastases initially treated with stereotactic radiation or whole brain radiotherapy, lesions 1 to < 2 cm (HR 2.30 [95% CI, 1.38-3.81], p = 0.001 and HR 2.61 [95% CI 1.76-3.89], p < 0.001, respectively) and ≥ 2 cm (HR 3.10 [95% CI, 1.62-5.94], p < 0.001 and HR 3.03 [95% CI 1.92-4.79], p < 0.001, respectively) displayed greater local recurrence compared to tumors < 0.5 cm. In addition, among patients treated with stereotactic radiation, significantly higher risk of radiographic and symptomatic necrosis was observed in tumors ≥ 0.5 cm versus < 0.5 cm at radiotherapy, with hazard ratios ranging from 3.27 to 18.90. CONCLUSION Larger metastasis size is associated with markedly poorer local control and increased necrosis following brain-directed radiation, suggesting a role for earlier utilization of radiation therapy in patients with small, asymptomatic metastases and a favorable prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nayan Lamba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul J Catalano
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hesham Elhalawani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shyam K Tanguturi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rifaquat Rahman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daphne A Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ayal A Aizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Noguchi M, Koide Y, Shindo Y, Aoyama T, Hashimoto S, Tachibana H, Kodaira T, Ishihara S, Naganawa S. Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent brain metastases: a retrospective comparison of local progression and distant brain metastases after prior radiosurgery. J Neurooncol 2025:10.1007/s11060-025-05035-8. [PMID: 40202569 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-025-05035-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2025] [Accepted: 04/01/2025] [Indexed: 04/10/2025]
Abstract
AIM This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of repeat stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for recurrent brain metastases (BMs), focusing on failure patterns of local progression (LP) and distant brain metastases (DBM). METHODS Patients who underwent first-time SRS for newly diagnosed BMs (2011-2022) and repeat SRS (until June 2024) were included. Treatment courses were first-time or repeat SRS, with repeat SRS classified as LP and DBM. The primary endpoint was the 1-year local control rate (LCR). Secondary endpoints included survival and radiation necrosis (RN) incidence. RESULTS Among 723 courses (427 patients, 4,524 BMs), 404 (141 patients, 2,924 BMs) met criteria. First-time SRS was performed in 141 courses (775 BMs), and repeat SRS in 263 (2,149 BMs), including 45 LP (38 patients, 224 BMs) and 218 DBM (126 patients, 1,925 BMs). The median age was 65 years, and 75.9% had lung cancer. LP had a longer interval from prior SRS (12.6 vs. 6.3 months, P < 0.001) but similar follow-up (12.4 vs. 13.7 months). The 1-year LCR was lower in LP (72.4% vs. 88.3%, P = 0.0022), though survival was similar (17.9 vs. 16.3 months). LP had higher RN incidence (20.6% vs. 5.7%, P < 0.001) and symptomatic RN (13.3% vs. 2.8%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified LP failure as a significant factor for increased local failure (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 2.35, P = 0.039) and RN (SHR 3.41, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Despite similar survival, LP failure was associated with lower LCR and higher RN incidence, highlighting the need for optimized repeat SRS strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masamune Noguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Kanokoden 1-1, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yutaro Koide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Kanokoden 1-1, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
| | - Yurika Shindo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Kanokoden 1-1, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takahiro Aoyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Kanokoden 1-1, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shingo Hashimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Kanokoden 1-1, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Tachibana
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Kanokoden 1-1, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kodaira
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Kanokoden 1-1, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shunichi Ishihara
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shinji Naganawa
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Shi Y, Guo Y, Li X, Wu L, Chen Z, Yang S, Bi M, Zhao Y, Yao W, Yu H, Wang K, Zhao W, Sun M, Zhang L, He Z, Lin Y, Shi J, Zhu B, Wang L, Pan Y, Shi H, Sun S, Wen M, Zhou R, Guo S, Han Z, Yi T, Zhang H, Cang S, Yu Z, Zhong D, Cui J, Fang J, Gao J, Li M, Ma R, Jiang M, Qin J, Shu Y, Ye F, Hu S, Li W, Lu H, Yang M, Yi S, Zhang Y, Fan Y, Ji H, Liu Z, Wang H, Zhou X, Zhang D, Peng J, Shen H, Gao F, Wang T, Zhou A. Rezivertinib versus gefitinib as first-line therapy for patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (REZOR): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study. THE LANCET. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2025; 13:327-337. [PMID: 39914443 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00417-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2024] [Revised: 12/02/2024] [Accepted: 12/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of rezivertinib (BPI-7711) and gefitinib as first-line therapies in patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS This multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study (REZOR) included eligible patients from 50 hospitals across China. Those who had been histologically or cytologically confirmed as having NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 Leu858Arg mutation by central laboratory were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive once daily either rezivertinib 180 mg or gefitinib 250 mg, until unacceptable toxicity occurred, disease progression, or other treatment discontinuation criteria were met. Each cycle lasted for 21 days. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival evaluated by masked independent central review (MICR) in the intention-to-treat set. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03866499 and follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS Between July 15, 2019, and Feb 14, 2022, 695 patients were screened. Among them, 369 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either rezivertinib 180 mg/day plus placebo (n=184) or gefitinib 250 mg/day plus placebo (n=185) in a 1:1 ratio; all of eligible participants were included in the intention-to-treat set. Median MICR-assessed progression-free survival was 19·3 months (95% CI 13·8-22·1) in the rezivertinib group and 9·6 months (8·4-11·3) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·48, 95% CI 0·36-0·63; p<0·0001) and the prespecified subgroup efficacy analysis showed consistent results. Median duration of exposure was 16·0 months (95% CI 0·0-29·7) in the rezivertinib group and 11·0 months (0·0-28·9) in the gefitinib group. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (82 [45%] of 184 in the rezivertinib group; 80 [43%] of 185 in the gefitinib group) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; 43 [23%] of 184 in the rezivertinib group; 43 [23%] of 185 in the gefitinib group) were similar in both groups. One patient died from a TRAE in the rezivertinib group, due to pneumonia and interstitial lung disease. INTERPRETATION Our findings suggested that rezivertinib is a potential choice for patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC as first-line therapy, owing to the superior overall efficacy and subgroup progression-free survival compared with gefitinib in targeted patients. No new safety signals were identified. FUNDING Beta Pharma (Shanghai) and the China National Science and Technology Major Project for Key New Drug Development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuankai Shi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| | - Yanzhen Guo
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science & Technology, Luoyang, China
| | - Xingya Li
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Lin Wu
- Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhaohong Chen
- Department of Oncology, People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, China
| | - Sheng Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Minghong Bi
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, China
| | - Yanqiu Zhao
- Respiratory Department of Internal Medicine, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Wenxiu Yao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital-Cancer Hospital Affiliated to University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Huiqing Yu
- Department of Geriatric Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Ke Wang
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wenhua Zhao
- Department of Internal Medicine for Lung Cancer, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Meili Sun
- Department of Oncology, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Liangming Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, China
| | - Zhiyong He
- Thoracic Medical Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yingcheng Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Jianhua Shi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Linyi Cancer Hospital, Linyi, China
| | - Bo Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Cancer, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Lijun Wang
- Cancer Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xingtai Medical College, Xingtai, China
| | - Yueyin Pan
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Huaqiu Shi
- Department of Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
| | - Shenghua Sun
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Meiling Wen
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Rui Zhou
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Shuliang Guo
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhigang Han
- Pulmonary Cancer Medicine, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Tienan Yi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Xiangyang, China
| | - Hua Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Shundong Cang
- Department of Oncology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Zhuang Yu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - DianSheng Zhong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Jiuwei Cui
- Oncology Center, Oncology Department, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Jian Fang
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jinghua Gao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, China
| | - Manxiang Li
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Rui Ma
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Mingyan Jiang
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Xiangtan Central Hospital, Xiangtan, China
| | - Jianwen Qin
- Respiratory and Critical Care Department, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yongqian Shu
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Province Hospital), Nanjing, China
| | - Feng Ye
- Department of Medical Oncology, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Antitumor Drug Transformation Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Sheng Hu
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Wen Li
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hong Lu
- Department of Oncology, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, China
| | - Minglei Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, China
| | - Shanyong Yi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Yun Fan
- Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hongbo Ji
- Department of Medical Oncology in Section One, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Oncology, Handan Central Hospital, Handan, China
| | - Haitao Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiangdong Zhou
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The first affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Chongqing, China
| | - Don Zhang
- Department of Drug Discovery, Beta Pharma, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Jirong Peng
- Department of Drug Discovery, Beta Pharma, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Haijiao Shen
- Department of Clinical Development, Beta Pharma (Shanghai), Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Gao
- Department of Clinical Development, Beta Pharma (Shanghai), Shanghai, China
| | - Tingting Wang
- Department of Clinical Development, Beta Pharma (Shanghai), Shanghai, China
| | - Anqi Zhou
- Department of Clinical Development, Beta Pharma (Shanghai), Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rashid NS, Rami A, Lang M, Stoltenberg H, Wolanski A, Ritzer J, Jacene H, Ravi P. Activity of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer and Brain Metastases. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2025; 23:102309. [PMID: 39999749 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2024] [Revised: 01/22/2025] [Accepted: 01/25/2025] [Indexed: 02/27/2025]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Avina Rami
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Min Lang
- Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Heather Jacene
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ma J, Del Balzo L, Walch H, Khaleel S, Knezevic A, Flynn J, Zhang Z, Eichholz J, Doshi SD, Voss MH, Freeman B, Ari Hakimi A, Lee CH, Bale TA, Kelly D, Mueller BA, Mann J, Yu Y, Zinovoy M, Chen L, Cuaron J, Khan A, Yamada Y, Shin JY, Beal K, Moss NS, Carlo MI, Motzer RJ, Imber BS, Kotecha RR, Pike LRG. Clinical Outcomes and Targeted Genomic Analysis of Renal Cell Carcinoma Brain Metastases Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Eur Urol Oncol 2025; 8:338-346. [PMID: 39107179 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Molecular profiles of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) brain metastases (BMs) are not well characterized. Effective management with locoregional therapies, including stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), is critical as systemic therapy advancements have improved overall survival (OS). OBJECTIVE To identify clinicogenomic features of RCC BMs treated with SRS in a large patient cohort. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A single-institution retrospective analysis was conducted of all RCC BM patients treated with SRS from January 1, 2010 to March 31, 2021. INTERVENTION SRS for RCC BMs. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Next-generation sequencing was performed to identify gene alterations more prevalent in BM patients. Clinical factors and genes altered in ≥10% of samples were assessed per patient using Cox proportional hazards models and per individual BM using clustered competing risks regression with competing risk of death. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Ninety-one RCC BM patients underwent SRS to 212 BMs, with a median follow-up of 38.8 mo for patients who survived. The median intracranial progression-free survival and OS were 7.8 (interquartile range [IQR] 5.7-11) and 21 (IQR 16-32) mo, respectively. Durable local control of 83% was achieved at 12 mo after SRS, and 59% of lesions initially meeting the radiographic criteria for progression at 3-mo evaluation would be considered to represent pseudoprogression at 6-mo evaluation. A comparison of genomic alterations at both the gene and the pathway level for BM+ patients compared with BM- patients revealed phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway alterations to be more prevalent in BM+ patients (43% vs 16%, p = 0.001, q = 0.01), with the majority being PTEN alterations (17% vs 2.7%, p = 0.003, q = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the largest study investigating genomic profiles of RCC BMs and the only such study with annotated intracranial outcomes. SRS provides durable in-field local control of BMs. Recognizing post-SRS pseudoprogression is crucial to ensure appropriate management. The incidence of PI3K pathway alterations is more prevalent in BM+ patients than in BM- patients and warrants further investigation in a prospective setting. PATIENT SUMMARY We examined the outcomes of radiotherapy for the treatment of brain metastases in kidney cancer patients at a single large referral center. We found that radiation provides good control of brain tumors, and certain genetic mutations may be found more commonly in patients with brain metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Luke Del Balzo
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Henry Walch
- Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sari Khaleel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea Knezevic
- Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica Flynn
- Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jordan Eichholz
- Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sahil D Doshi
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martin H Voss
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Benjamin Freeman
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - A Ari Hakimi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chung-Han Lee
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tejus A Bale
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel Kelly
- Technology Division, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Boris A Mueller
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Justin Mann
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melissa Zinovoy
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Linda Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - John Cuaron
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Atif Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yoshiya Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jacob Y Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kathryn Beal
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nelson S Moss
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria I Carlo
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert J Motzer
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brandon S Imber
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ritesh R Kotecha
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Luke R G Pike
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Huang RY, Youssef G, Nelson T, Wen PY, Forsyth P, Hodi FS, Margolin K, Algazi AP, Hamid O, Lao CD, Ernstoff MS, Moschos SJ, Atkins MB, Postow MA, Reardon DA, Grootendorst DJ, Leung D, Askelson M, Ritchings C, Tawbi HA. Comparative Analysis of Intracranial Response Assessment Criteria in Patients With Melanoma Brain Metastases Treated With Combination Nivolumab + Ipilimumab in CheckMate 204. J Clin Oncol 2025; 43:1210-1218. [PMID: 39752606 PMCID: PMC11949218 DOI: 10.1200/jco.24.00953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Revised: 10/24/2024] [Accepted: 11/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/29/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In CheckMate 204, nivolumab + ipilimumab showed high intracranial (IC) objective response rates (icORRs) in patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBMs). Using icORR as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) has prompted use of alternate response criteria. To set the stage for harmonized MBM trials, the aim of this exploratory analysis was to determine icORR using several response criteria and examine correlations of response with survival. METHODS Patients (N = 119) with ≥one unirradiated MBMs received nivolumab + ipilimumab every 3 weeks (four doses), followed by nivolumab every 2 weeks for ≤24 months. Blinded review icORR was assessed with modified RECIST (mRECIST), Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM; 5 mm and 10 mm cutoffs), and volumetric criteria (5 mm and 10 mm). Using a 6-week response landmark, IC progression-free survival (icPFS) and OS were compared for responders versus nonresponders. RESULTS icORR was higher with mRECIST and volumetric criteria than with RANO-BM or RECIST. mRECIST and volumetric response also showed stronger correlations with icPFS and OS. mRECIST responders who were RANO-BM 5 mm nonresponders (n = 14) had similar OS to RANO-BM 5 mm responders (n = 41). Clinical deterioration affected RANO-BM icORR; however, when assessed only radiographically without deterioration, RANO-BM 5 mm performed similarly to mRECIST. Among 41 patients with target lesions all <10 mm, responder icPFS and OS were similar to those of responders in the total population, indicating that response could be accurately determined in these patients. CONCLUSION This analysis supports mRECIST or radiographic-only RANO-BM 5 mm as reliable assessment scales in MBM trials. Volumetric response correlated with survival, supporting its application in future trials. Response could be accurately determined in patients with MBMs all <10 mm, supporting the inclusion of patients with MBMs ≥5 mm in future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond Y. Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Gilbert Youssef
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Thomas Nelson
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Patrick Y. Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Peter Forsyth
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - F. Stephen Hodi
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Kim Margolin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Saint John's Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA
| | - Alain P. Algazi
- Department of Medicine, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Omid Hamid
- The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, a Cedars-Sinai Affiliate, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Christopher D. Lao
- Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Marc S. Ernstoff
- Department of Immuno-Oncology, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD
| | - Stergios J. Moschos
- Division of Medical Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Michael B. Atkins
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC
| | - Michael A. Postow
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - David A. Reardon
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | - Hussein A. Tawbi
- Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Xiuming Z, Jia Z, Qun C, Haining C, Renli L, Yucun Z, Zheng W. Efficacy and safety of combined anti-vascular and two-staged stereotactic radiosurgery therapy for brain metastases with brainstem compression: a retrospective multicenter study. Clin Exp Metastasis 2025; 42:21. [PMID: 40156632 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-025-10338-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2025] [Indexed: 04/01/2025]
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery poses a significant risk when treating brain metastases in close proximity to the brainstem. To address this issue, a novel approach known as "combined anti-vascular therapy" has been devised for these metastases. This treatment regimen involves a one-week course of two-staged stereotactic radiosurgery (2-SSRS), supplemented with the administration of the anti-vascular agent bevacizumab during the radiosurgery interval. We tried to find out the effectiveness and safety of 2-SSRS plus bevacizumab therapy for brain metastases that compress the brainstem, and prognostic factors that related to the tumor local control. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients treated at five gamma knife treatment centers to assess changes in tumor size and peritumoral edema volume. Cox regression model was used to find out prognostic factors for tumor local control. Clinical symptom changes were evaluated using the Headache Scale (VAS), Dizziness Disorder Inventory (DHI), Vomiting Scale (VS), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). The Karnofsky Task Scale (KPS) and Barthel Index (BI) were used to assess overall physical fitness and physical activity rehabilitation. Tumor local control (TLC) and overall survival (OS) rate were also calculated for the patients. Among the 36 patients with brain metastases with brainstem compression, 36 received combined anti-vascular therapy. Both edema volume and tumor volume significantly decreased during the treatment period and post-treatment 3 months (p < 0.01). Clinical symptoms, as indicated by median scores of VAS, DHI, VS, and GCS, showed significant improvement during treatment and at the 3-month follow-up (p < 0.01). Median changes in KPS and BI, reflecting overall physical fitness and physical activity rehabilitation, were also similar and statistically significant (p < 0.01). The patient cohort exhibited a median overall survival of 14.2 months, with corresponding 6-month and 12-month survival rates of 91.7% and 80.0%, respectively. Tumor local control rates at 6 and 12 months were 94.7% and 78.9%, Patient with KPS score > = 60 and single intracranial brain metastasis before treatment enjoy longer local tumor control. The combination of anti-vascular therapy with 2-SSRS demonstrates safety and efficacy in treating patients with brain metastases with brainstem compression. This approach rapidly alleviates patient symptoms, effectively manages tumor progression, extends overall survival, and exhibits manageable adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhu Xiuming
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (People's Hospital of Hang Zhou Medical College), Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhou Jia
- Cancer Center, Department of Gamma Knife Treatment, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (People's Hospital of Hang Zhou Medical College), Hangzhou, China
| | - Chen Qun
- Gamma Knife Treatment Center, Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Chen Haining
- Gamma Knife Treatment Center, Anhui Provincial Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Li Renli
- Gamma Knife Treatment Center, Shanghai 411 Affiliated Hospital of Shanghai University, shanghai, China
| | - Zhu Yucun
- Gamma Knife Treatment Center, BenQ Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Wang Zheng
- Cancer Center, Department of Gamma Knife Treatment, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (People's Hospital of Hang Zhou Medical College), Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Höfler D, Grigo J, Siavosch H, Saake M, Schmidt MA, Weissmann T, Schubert P, Voigt R, Lettmaier S, Semrau S, Dörfler A, Uder M, Bert C, Fietkau R, Putz F. MRI distortion correction is associated with improved local control in stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases. Sci Rep 2025; 15:9077. [PMID: 40097510 PMCID: PMC11914157 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-93255-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2025] [Indexed: 03/19/2025] Open
Abstract
Distortions in brain MRI caused by gradient nonlinearities may reach several millimeters, thus distortion correction is strongly recommended for radiotherapy treatment planning. However, the significance of MRI distortion correction on actual clinical outcomes has not been described yet. Therefore, we investigated the impact of planning MRI distortion correction on subsequent local control in a historic series of 419 brain metastases in 189 patients treated with stereotactic radiotherapy between 01/2003 and 04/2015. Local control was evaluated using a volumetric extension of the RANO-BM criteria. The predictive significance of distortion correction was assessed using competing risk analysis. In this cohort, 2D distortion-corrected MRIs had been used for treatment planning in 52.5% (220/419) of lesions, while uncorrected MRIs had been employed in 47.5% (199/419) of metastases. 2D distortion correction was associated with improved local control (Cumulative incidence of local progression at 12 months: 14.3% vs. 21.2% and at 24 months: 18.7% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.038). In multivariate analysis, adjusting for histology, baseline tumor volume, interval between MRI and treatment delivery, year of planning MRI, biologically effective dose and adjuvant Whole-brain radiotherapy, use of distortion correction remained significantly associated with improved local control (HR 0.55, p = 0.020). This is the first study to clinically evaluate the impact of MRI gradient nonlinearity distortion correction on local control in stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases. In this historic series, we found significantly higher local control when using 2D corrected vs. uncorrected MRI studies for treatment planning. These results stress the importance of assuring that MR images used for radiotherapy treatment planning are properly distortion-corrected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Höfler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany.
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany.
| | - Johanna Grigo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hadi Siavosch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marc Saake
- Institute of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Manuel Alexander Schmidt
- Department of Neuroradiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schwabachanlage 6, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Weissmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp Schubert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Raphaela Voigt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Lettmaier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sabine Semrau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Arnd Dörfler
- Department of Neuroradiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schwabachanlage 6, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Uder
- Institute of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Putz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nobel H, Ofer J, Borenstein SF, Limon D, Gal O, Laviv Y, Kanner AA, Siegal T, Yust-Katz S, Benouaich-Amiel A. Long-term impact of bevacizumab for the treatment of brain radiation necrosis. J Neurooncol 2025:10.1007/s11060-025-04979-1. [PMID: 40072807 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-025-04979-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2025] [Accepted: 02/13/2025] [Indexed: 03/14/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate short and long-term efficacy of bevacizumab (Bev), for the treatment of radiation necrosis (RN) in patients with brain metastasis after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS The database of a tertiary medical center was reviewed for all adult patients treated by Bev (from January 2018 to January 2023) for RN after having received SRS for BM. Clinical and MRI data were systematically collected at baseline, immediately after the completion of Bev treatment, and at 6, 12, and, when available, 24 months post-treatment. RESULTS The cohort included 23 patients with a total of 31 RN lesions (defined as target lesion) which have been previously treated by SRS, either as single-session SRS (27/31) or as fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (4/31). Median follow-up time was 15 months (range: 8-28.5). Immediately after completion of Bev, 15 patients (65.2%) exhibited a complete/partial response, 6 (26.1%) had stable disease, and 2 had progressive disease (8.7%). thirteen patients (56%) improved clinically. Greater than 50% reduction in volume was observed in 84% of target lesions. At 12 months, among the 13 patients still evaluable (9 other being deceased, 1 loss to follow up), three continued to improve, and four remained stable. Median volume of target lesion was then 1.4 cm3 (range 0.7-2.9) demonstrating a reduction of 67.4% compared to the initial target volume, which was 4.35 cm3 (range 2.14-10.37). During the entire follow-up period, 11 patients experienced regrowth of the target lesion; median time to progression was 7 months. Five underwent Bev re-challenge, but only 2 responded. CONCLUSION Bev for the treatment of SRS-induced RN was associated with a high initial response rate, significant lesion reduction, and prolonged clinical improvement. However, the high rate of lesion regrowth (50%) and poor response to Bev re-challenge highlight the complexity of diagnosis and treatment of RN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hila Nobel
- Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center- Beilinson Hospital, 39 Jabotinsky Street, Petach Tikva, 4941492, Israel.
| | - Jonathan Ofer
- Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center- Beilinson Hospital, 39 Jabotinsky Street, Petach Tikva, 4941492, Israel
| | - Sara Faye Borenstein
- Department of Radiology, Rabin Medical Center- Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Dror Limon
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center- Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Omer Gal
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center- Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Yosef Laviv
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rabin Medical Center- Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Andrew A Kanner
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rabin Medical Center- Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Tali Siegal
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center- Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel
- Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Shlomit Yust-Katz
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center- Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Alexandra Benouaich-Amiel
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center- Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Liang F, Sun Y, Yang J, Shen Z, Wang G, Zhu J, Zhou C, Xia Y. Gut microbiome is associated with radiotherapy response in lung cancer patients with brain metastases. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2025; 15:1562831. [PMID: 40129929 PMCID: PMC11931136 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1562831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2025] [Accepted: 02/24/2025] [Indexed: 03/26/2025] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the gut microbiome of lung cancer patients with brain metastases undergoing radiotherapy, identify key microorganisms associated with radiotherapy response, and evaluate their potential as biomarkers. Methods and materials This study enrolled 55 newly diagnosed lung cancer patients with brain metastases. Fecal samples were collected before radiotherapy and analyzed by 16S rRNA sequencing to assess the gut microbiome's composition and function. Patients were categorized into response (n=28) and non-response (n=27) groups based on treatment efficacy, and α-diversity, β-diversity, and functional pathways were compared between them. Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size was used to identify microbial features associated with treatment efficacy. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the predictive capacity of clinical and microbial factors for treatment outcomes. Results No significant difference in α-diversity was observed between the groups (P > 0.05), but β-diversity differed significantly (P = 0.036). Twelve characteristic microorganisms were identified in the response group, including g_ Oscillibacter and g_ Blautia, and nine in the non-response group, such as f_ Desulfovibrionaceae and g_ Megamonas. Metabolic pathways associated with treatment response included ketone body metabolism and pathways related to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Multivariate analysis identified g_Flavonifractor (odds ratio [OR] = 6.680, P = 0.004), g_Negativibacillus (OR = 3.862, P = 0.014), C-reactive protein (OR = 1.054, P = 0.017), and systemic inflammation response index (OR = 1.367, P = 0.043) as independent predictors of radiotherapy response. The nomogram and microbiome models achieved area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.935 and 0.866, respectively, demonstrating excellent predictive performance. Decision curve analysis further confirmed these models provided significant net benefits across risk thresholds. Conclusions The composition and functional characteristics of the gut microbiome in lung cancer patients with brain metastases prior to radiotherapy are associated with therapeutic response and possess potential as predictive biomarkers. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang/ Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yichu Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang/ Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jing Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University/ The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ziqiang Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang/ Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
| | - Guangfeng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang/ Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jiangrui Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University/ The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
| | - Chong Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Youyou Xia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang/ Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University/ The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Grinda T, Morganti S, Hsu L, Yoo TK, Kusmick RJ, Aizer AA, Giordano A, Leone JP, Hughes M, Tolaney SM, Lin NU, Sammons SL. Real-World outcomes with sacituzumab govitecan among breast cancer patients with central nervous system metastases. NPJ Breast Cancer 2025; 11:22. [PMID: 40038301 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-025-00736-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2025] [Indexed: 03/06/2025] Open
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are associated with poor prognosis in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this retrospective study, we investigated the activity of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in 33 patients with HER2-negative MBC and CNS metastases, including active, stable/treated, and leptomeningeal disease (LMD). SG demonstrated a modest CNS objective response rate of 4/30 (13%) and median CNS-progression-free survival of 2.9 months (95%CI:2.0-4.3) in a heavily pretreated population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Grinda
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Departement of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| | - Stefania Morganti
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Liangge Hsu
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tae-Kyung Yoo
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ross J Kusmick
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ayal A Aizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Antonio Giordano
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jose P Leone
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melissa Hughes
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sara M Tolaney
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah L Sammons
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Policelli R, DeVries D, Laba J, Leung A, Tang T, Albweady A, Alqaidy G, Ward AD. Prediction of brain metastasis progression after stereotactic radiosurgery: sensitivity to changing the definition of progression. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2025; 12:024504. [PMID: 40206813 PMCID: PMC11978467 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.12.2.024504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2024] [Revised: 03/14/2025] [Accepted: 03/19/2025] [Indexed: 04/11/2025] Open
Abstract
Purpose Machine learning (ML) has been used to predict tumor progression post-stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) based on pre-treatment MRI for brain metastasis (BM) patients, but there is variability in the definition of what constitutes progression. We aim to measure the magnitude of the change of performance of an ML model predicting post-SRS progression when various definitions of progression were used. Approach We collected pre- and post-SRS contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI scans from 62 BM patients ( n = 115 BMs). We trained a random decision forest model using radiomic features extracted from pre-SRS scans to predict progression versus non-progression for each BM. We varied the definition of progression by changing (1) the follow-up period ( < 9 , < 12 , < 15 , < 18 , or < 24 months); (2) the size change metric denoting progression ( ≥ 10 % , ≥ 15 % , ≥ 20 % , or ≥ 25 % in volume) or response assessment in neuro-oncology BM diameter ( ≥ 20 % ); and (3) whether BMs with treatment-related size changes (TRSCs) (pseudo-progression and/or radiation-necrosis) were labeled as progression. We measured performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results When we varied the follow-up period, size change metric, and TRSC labeling, the AUCs had ranges of 0.06 (0.69 to 0.75), 0.06 (0.69 to 0.75), and 0.08 (0.69 to 0.77), respectively. Radiomic feature importance remained similar. Conclusions Variability in the definition of BM progression has a measurable impact on the performance of an MRI radiomic-based ML model predicting post-SRS progression. A consistent, clinically relevant definition of post-SRS progression across studies would enable robust comparison of proposed ML systems, thereby accelerating progress in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Policelli
- Western University, Department of Medical Biophysics, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - David DeVries
- Verspeeten Family Cancer Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joanna Laba
- Verspeeten Family Cancer Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, London, Ontario, Canada
- Western University, Department of Oncology, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Leung
- Western University, Department of Medical Imaging, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Terence Tang
- Verspeeten Family Cancer Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ali Albweady
- Qassim University, College of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ghada Alqaidy
- King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Radiodiagnostic and Medical Imaging Department, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Aaron D. Ward
- Western University, Department of Medical Biophysics, London, Ontario, Canada
- Western University, Department of Oncology, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Marwaha AS, Liang Y, Shepard MJ, Yu A, Karlovits SM, Wegner RE. Patterns of failure after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases from small cell lung cancer: outcomes in the immunotherapy era. J Neurooncol 2025; 172:177-183. [PMID: 39643852 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04895-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2024] [Accepted: 11/20/2024] [Indexed: 12/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is known to have high rates of development of brain metastases. Standard treatment has been whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) but the role for more focused treatment and hippocampal avoidance has arisen in the past decade. In addition, with possible penetration of the central nervous system by more modern immunotherapies, the risk of distant failure may be lower. As such, we reviewed patients at our institution treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to look at patterns, locations, and predictors of failure in the brain. MATERIALS/METHODS A retrospective review and analysis of charts was done on 46 patients treated with SRS (no history of prior WBRT) for their brain metastases from SCLC. Multivariate analysis was used to determine significant prognostic factors influencing survival and local/distant failure. We tracked timing and type of immunotherapy, if any, as well as if patients failed in the hippocampus or required WBRT. RESULTS There were 46 patients with 97 total brain metastases treated with SRS in this study. Median number of metastases was 2 (1-5). The median dose of radiation was 20 Gy (20-30) in 3 fractions (1-5) for all 97 tumors. 11 patients did not receive immunotherapy, whereas 35 patients had immunotherapy of some sort. Median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 13 months, with a 12 month OS of 59% and 2 year OS of 30%. Cox regression did not reveal any significant predictors of OS, including age, sex, total volume, extracranial disease, KPS, immunotherapy, or number of metastases. 12 month and 24 month local control of disease was 95% and 80%, respectively. There were no significant predictors of local failure including volume, dose, or immunotherapy. 25 of the patients had distant brain failure, with a rate of distant failure of 38% and 64% for 6 and 12 months, respectively. Immunotherapy, number of metastases, total target volume, nor presence of extracranial disease was predictive of distant brain failure. WBRT free survival was also measured and found to be 73% at 1 year. There were no significant predictors for this measure. Lastly, five patients in this cohort showed failure in the hippocampus, where the rate of failure at 6 and 12 months was 16%. CONCLUSION Rates of distant brain failure in SCLC patients after SRS remain similar to those of NSCLC patients in the immunotherapy era. We did not show a decrease in distant failure rate based on immunotherapy use. The rate of hippocampal failure was quite low and should provide reassurance that SRS and techniques such as HA-IMRT can be reasonably used in these patients. Ongoing clinical trials will help provide more definitive answers in this arena.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander S Marwaha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, USA.
| | - Yun Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Matthew J Shepard
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Alexander Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Stephen M Karlovits
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Rodney E Wegner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Haskell-Mendoza AP, Gonzalez AT, Reason EH, Flusche AM, Chongsathidkiet P, Wachsmuth LP, Goodwin CR, Fecci PE. The LITT Fit in neuro-oncology: indications, imaging, and adjunctive therapies. J Neurooncol 2025; 172:1-11. [PMID: 39585599 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04894-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 11/18/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is an unmet need for new treatments for many central nervous system tumors. An expanding body of research supports the use of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) in the treatment of gliomas, recurrent brain metastases, and radiation necrosis. METHODS In this review, we highlight emerging indications for LITT, including its use adjacent to eloquent structures, in the posterior fossa, and for meningioma and tumors of the vertebral column. We conclude by providing an overview of current research into post-LITT response assessment and adjunctive therapies. RESULTS Evidence has continued to accumulate regarding the safety of LITT in locations as varied as the motor cortex, posterior fossa, and vertebral column, as well as for novel pathologies such as meningioma. Regardless of disease histology, most patients leave the hospital within 12-48 h of LITT and can rapidly return to systemic and radiation therapies. Emerging data has allowed for a characterization of post-LITT imaging findings, and receipt of LITT should not preclude subsequent clinical trial enrollment, especially as hyperthermia modulates blood-brain barrier permeability and may synergize with immunotherapies. CONCLUSION As LITT is incorporated into neurosurgical oncology practice, novel use cases will continue to emerge. Given that laser ablation is associated with shortened length of stay and decreased debility relative to open resection, development of radiographic response assessment criteria for LITT-treated lesions is urgently needed so that patients may more rapidly receive definitive management or proceed to clinical trial enrollment. Prospective evaluation of LITT and adjunctive combination therapies is ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aden P Haskell-Mendoza
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ariel T Gonzalez
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ellery H Reason
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ann Marie Flusche
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Pakawat Chongsathidkiet
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lucas P Wachsmuth
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - C Rory Goodwin
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Peter E Fecci
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Azab MA, El-Gohary N, Atallah O, Shama M, Ibrahim IA. Perfusion-MRI for differentiating cerebral metastatic lesions and gliomas: An evidence-based review. J Clin Neurosci 2025; 133:111036. [PMID: 39799817 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2024] [Revised: 12/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/04/2025] [Indexed: 01/15/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lesions affecting the brain are variable and have multiple pathologies. Brain metastasis is a common entity of lesions that can be misleading in diagnosis. Brain metastasis affects the patient's life and survival in about 40% of cases; all patients with metastatic brain lesions are indicated for surgery, so proper diagnosis is crucial for each patient. Non-invasive diagnosis is a promising way to confirm the diagnosis of cerebral metastatic lesions for patients who are not indicated for surgery for medical reasons. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence-based review article regarding utilizing perfusion-MRI for approaching cerebral metastatic lesions. METHODS A comprehensive database search on PubMed/Medline, Scopus and Google Scholar was done by the relevant keywords. Eligibility of articles was done by following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to determine the risk of bias among the included studies. RESULTS From 2989 articles, only 31 studies were eligible for the qualitative synthesis. A comprehensive summary of the included study was made according to population, intervention, comparator and outcomes (PICO) method. CONCLUSIONS Diagnosing cerebral metastases, categorizing subtypes, and monitoring their response to treatment is a challenging endeavor for neurosurgeons, neuroradiologists, and oncologists. Technological advances in MRI software as perfusion-based MRIs are designated to facilitate diagnosis and follow-up for patients with cerebral metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed A Azab
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cairo University Hospital, Ciro, Egypt.
| | - Nour El-Gohary
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cairo University Hospital, Ciro, Egypt
| | - Oday Atallah
- Department of Neurosurgery, Carl Von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Mohsen Shama
- Department of Emergency Medicine, KAMC, Mekkah, KSA
| | - Ismail A Ibrahim
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Fenerbahçe University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Chen H, Tan G, Zhong L, Hu Y, Han W, Huang Y, Liang Q, Szekeres D, Jiang H, Bharadwaj R, Smith SM, Wang HZ, Liu X. MR perfusion characteristics of pseudoprogression in brain tumors treated with immunotherapy - a comparative study with chemo-radiation induced pseudoprogression and radiation necrosis. J Neurooncol 2025; 172:239-247. [PMID: 39688766 PMCID: PMC11832695 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04910-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2024] [Accepted: 12/06/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pseudoprogression is an atypical imaging pattern of response to immunotherapy in patients with brain tumors. MR perfusion studies in this field are limited. The purpose of our study is to compare the perfusion features between pseudoprogression lesions in malignant gliomas and brain metastases treated with immunotherapy (iPsP) and the pseudoprogression after chemo-radiation therapy and radiation necrosis after radiation treatment (ChR-PsP & RN). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 25 iPsP lesions in 16 brain tumor patients and 48 ChR-PsP & RN lesions in 35 patients. The cerebral blood volume (CBV) of MR dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) was analyzed, and the mean and maximal values of the ratio of CBV (rCBVmean and rCBVmax) of iPsPs and ChR-PsP & RNs were calculated and compared between these two groups using the Mann-Whitney U test. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted, and the optimal cutoff of perfusion parameters were determined using the area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS The medians of rCBVmean and rCBVmax in iPsP group were significantly higher (0.94 and 1.39 respectively) than ChR-PsP & RN group (0.67, p < 0.01 and 1.1, p = 0.01 respectively). The rCBVmean value of 0.69 can differentiate the iPsP from ChR-PsP & RN with the area under the curve of 0.71, sensitivity of 0.72, and specificity of 0.56. CONCLUSION These findings may suggest immunotherapy-induced higher perfusion in the iPsP lesions compared to ChR-PsP & RN lesions in primary and metastatic brain tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongyan Chen
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Guirong Tan
- Advanced Neuroimaging Laboratory, The Affiliated Yuebei People's Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong Province, China
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Yuebei People's Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Lijuan Zhong
- Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Yuebei People's Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yichuan Hu
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Yuebei People's Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Wenjing Han
- Yanjing Medical College, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Huang
- Interventional Radiotherapy Room, The Affiliated Yuebei People's Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Qiong Liang
- Department of Pathology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Denes Szekeres
- University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Haihui Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Rajnish Bharadwaj
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (SMD), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Stephen M Smith
- Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Henry Z Wang
- Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Xiang Liu
- Advanced Neuroimaging Laboratory, The Affiliated Yuebei People's Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong Province, China.
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Yuebei People's Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, Guangdong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zhang H, Liu J, Dohopolski M, Wardak Z, Timmerman R, Peng H. Gradient-Based Radiomics for Outcome Prediction and Decision-Making in PULSAR: A Preliminary Study. Int J Part Ther 2025; 15:100739. [PMID: 39996164 PMCID: PMC11848104 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2025.100739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2024] [Revised: 01/17/2025] [Accepted: 01/27/2025] [Indexed: 02/26/2025] Open
Abstract
Purpose Personalized ultrafractionated stereotactic adaptive radiation therapy (PULSAR) has emerged as an innovative method for delivering high-dose radiation over extended intervals, adapting treatment based on the patient's response. However, current adaptation largely relies on physicians' experience and tumor size assessment, underscoring the need for a data-driven approach to improve outcome prediction and support decision-making. Materials and Methods We analyzed 69 lesions from 39 patients undergoing PULSAR treatment. Gradient-based features, including gradient magnitude, radial gradient, and radial deviation, were extracted from both intratumoral and peritumoral regions, with the latter further divided into octant subregions. Support vector machine models were developed using features from first magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), second MRI, and delta mode (change between the 2). An ensemble feature selection (EFS) model was then created by combining the features of the top-performing individual models. The approach was validated on a non-PULSAR cohort (37 lesions from 23 patients) treated with standard fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy. Results The EFS model shows strong predictive performance in determining whether tumor volume reduction exceeds 20% at the 3-month postradiation time point. Features derived from octant subregions exhibit significantly better prediction than those from the core or entire margin. Pretreatment features (from first MRI) generally outperform second MRI and delta-mode features, while the inclusion of 1 delta feature in the EFS model enhances performance. In the non-PULSAR cohort, the gradient-based approach outperforms conventional radiomics, demonstrating its strong generalizability. Conclusion Our gradient-based radiomics approach, combining spatial segmentation and temporal features, significantly enhances treatment response prediction in PULSAR therapy. Its superior performance compared to conventional radiomics, coupled with its effectiveness in both PULSAR and non-PULSAR cohorts, highlights its potential as a robust tool for personalized treatment planning in neuro-oncology, applicable to both photon and particle therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haozhao Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Jiaqi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Michael Dohopolski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Zabi Wardak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Robert Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Hao Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
El Shafie RA, Bernhardt D, Welzel T, Schiele A, Schmitt D, Thalmann P, Erdem S, Paul A, Höne S, Lang K, König L, Weykamp F, Adeberg S, Lentz-Hommertgen A, Jäkel C, Bozorgmehr F, Nestle U, Thomas M, Sander A, Kieser M, Debus J, Rieken S. Stereotactic radiosurgery for 1-10 brain metastases to avoid whole-brain radiotherapy: Results of the CYBER-SPACE randomized phase 2 trial. Neuro Oncol 2025; 27:479-491. [PMID: 39340439 PMCID: PMC11812257 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an emerging alternative to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for treating multiple brain metastases (BM), reducing toxicity, and improving tumor control. The CYBER-SPACE trial compared SRS based on either SPACE or MPRAGE MRI sequence for avoiding or delaying WBRT in patients with 1-10 BM. METHODS Patients with 1-10 untreated BM were randomized 1:1 to receive SRS of all lesions based on either SPACE or MPRAGE MRI sequences. If subsequently new BM occurred, SRS was repeated. WBRT was indicated upon occurrence of >10 new BM, leptomeningeal disease, or exhausted SRS-radiotolerance. The primary outcome was freedom from WBRT indication (WBRTi). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), safety, and quality of life. RESULTS A total of 202 patients were randomized; SPACE n = 99, MPRAGE n = 103. Twelve-month WBRTi-free survival was 77.1% (95% CI: 69.5%-83.1%) overall, 78.5% (95% CI: 66.7%-86.5%) for SPACE, and 76.0% (95% CI: 65.2%-83.9%) for MPRAGE (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.43-1.63, P = .590). Patients with 5-10 BM had shorter WBRTi-free survival (HR = 3.13, 95% CI: 1.53-6.40, P = .002). Median OS was 13.1 months overall, 10.5 months for SPACE, and 15.2 months for MPRAGE (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.78-1.56, P = .585). Neurologic death rate was 10.1%. Predictors for longer OS included Karnofsky Performance Status >80% (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.77, P = .002) and concurrent immunotherapy (HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23-0.52, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The more sensitive SPACE sequence did not improve outcomes over MPRAGE. SRS with thorough monitoring and immediate re-treatment for new lesions decreases the need for WBRT and achieves low neurologic death rates. SRS should be considered a favorable alternative to WBRT for patients with 1-10 BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rami A El Shafie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Welzel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Annabella Schiele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniela Schmitt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Paul Thalmann
- Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sinem Erdem
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Angela Paul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon Höne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Adriane Lentz-Hommertgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cornelia Jäkel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Farastuk Bozorgmehr
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Centre Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Moenchengladbach, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Thomas
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Centre Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anja Sander
- Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Meinhard Kieser
- Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany (J.D.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Volovăț SR, Boboc DI, Ostafe MR, Buzea CG, Agop M, Ochiuz L, Rusu DI, Vasincu D, Ungureanu MI, Volovăț CC. Utilizing Vision Transformers for Predicting Early Response of Brain Metastasis to Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Stage Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Treatment. Tomography 2025; 11:15. [PMID: 39997998 PMCID: PMC11860310 DOI: 10.3390/tomography11020015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2024] [Revised: 01/11/2025] [Accepted: 02/01/2025] [Indexed: 02/26/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES This study explores the application of vision transformers to predict early responses to stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases using minimally pre-processed magnetic resonance imaging scans. The objective is to assess the potential of vision transformers as a predictive tool for clinical decision-making, particularly in the context of imbalanced datasets. METHODS We analyzed magnetic resonance imaging scans from 19 brain metastases patients, focusing on axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and high-resolution contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences. Patients were categorized into responders (complete or partial response) and non-responders (stable or progressive disease). RESULTS Despite the imbalanced nature of the dataset, our results demonstrate that vision transformers can predict early treatment responses with an overall accuracy of 99%. The model exhibited high precision (99% for progression and 100% for regression) and recall (99% for progression and 100% for regression). The use of the attention mechanism in the vision transformers allowed the model to focus on relevant features in the magnetic resonance imaging images, ensuring an unbiased performance even with the imbalanced data. Confusion matrix analysis further confirmed the model's reliability, with minimal misclassifications. Additionally, the model achieved a perfect area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC = 1.00), effectively distinguishing between responders and non-responders. CONCLUSIONS These findings highlight the potential of vision transformers, aided by the attention mechanism, as a non-invasive, predictive tool for early response assessment in clinical oncology. The vision transformer (ViT) model employed in this study processes MRIs as sequences of patches, enabling the capture of localized tumor features critical for early response prediction. By leveraging patch-based feature learning, this approach enhances robustness, interpretability, and clinical applicability, addressing key challenges in tumor progression prediction following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The model's robust performance, despite the dataset imbalance, underscores its ability to provide unbiased predictions. This approach could significantly enhance clinical decision-making and support personalized treatment strategies for brain metastases. Future research should validate these findings in larger, more diverse cohorts and explore the integration of additional data types to further optimize the model's clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Ruxandra Volovăț
- Medical Oncology-Radiotherapy Department, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași, 700115 Iași, Romania; (S.R.V.); (D.-I.B.); (M.-R.O.)
| | - Diana-Ioana Boboc
- Medical Oncology-Radiotherapy Department, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași, 700115 Iași, Romania; (S.R.V.); (D.-I.B.); (M.-R.O.)
| | - Mădălina-Raluca Ostafe
- Medical Oncology-Radiotherapy Department, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași, 700115 Iași, Romania; (S.R.V.); (D.-I.B.); (M.-R.O.)
| | - Călin Gheorghe Buzea
- “Prof. Dr. Nicolae Oblu” Clinical Emergency Hospital Iași, 700309 Iași, Romania;
- National Institute of Research and Development for Technical Physics, IFT Iași, 700050 Iași, Romania
| | - Maricel Agop
- Physics Department, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University Iași, 700050 Iași, Romania;
| | - Lăcrămioara Ochiuz
- Faculty of Pharmacy, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași, 700115 Iași, Romania;
| | - Dragoș Ioan Rusu
- Faculty of Science, “V. Alecsandri” University of Bacău, 600115 Bacău, Romania;
| | - Decebal Vasincu
- Surgery Department, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași, 700115 Iași, Romania;
| | - Monica Iuliana Ungureanu
- Preventive Medicine and Interdisciplinarity Department, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași, 700115 Iași, Romania
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gruber I, Koelbl O. Competing Risks and Their Impact on Treatment Efficacy Assessment in Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: A Retrospective Study. Health Sci Rep 2025; 8:e70447. [PMID: 39931260 PMCID: PMC11808314 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2024] [Revised: 01/18/2025] [Accepted: 01/23/2025] [Indexed: 02/13/2025] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and competing risk analysis are two statistical approaches for analyzing time-to-event data. These methods differ in their treatment of competing events, such as deaths occurring before the event of interest, which can impact the interpretation of treatment efficacy in oncology. Methods This retrospective study included 73 patients who underwent fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (six fractions of 5 Gy) for brain metastases at the University Hospital Regensburg between January 2017 and December 2021. The events of interest were the cumulative incidences of local failure within the planning target volume and the development of new brain metastases. Premature deaths occurring before the events of interest were treated as competing events. The complement of the KM method (1-KM), which censors patients who die prematurely, was compared to the cumulative incidence function (CIF), which accounts for the fact that patients who die without experiencing the event of interest are no longer at risk for that event. Results The median follow-up was 56 months. The most common cancer types were non-small cell lung cancer (n = 26, 35.6%) and malignant melanoma (n = 25, 34.2%). Using CIF, the cumulative incidences of local failure and new brain metastases were 27% and 55% at 24 months, respectively. The 1-KM method overestimated the cumulative incidence of local failure by 9% at 24 months and 14% at 36 months, and new brain metastases by 13% at both 24 and 36 months. Survival curves for 1-KM and CIF showed simultaneous increases for each event, with 1-KM consistently higher, reflecting differing approaches to competing risks. Conclusion This study highlights the impact of statistical method selection on clinical data interpretation and underscores the bias inherent in studies that fail to account for competing risks. Recognizing these differences is crucial for accurately assessing treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Gruber
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital RegensburgRegensburgBavariaGermany
| | - Oliver Koelbl
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital RegensburgRegensburgBavariaGermany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Benghiat H, Hodson J, Hickman M, Meade S, Hussein S, Stange R, Heyes G, Jackson T, Augustus H, Chavda S, Sawlani V, Ramalingham S, Bowen M, Hartley AG, Sanghera P. Outcomes of Patients With Five or More Brain Metastases Treated With Stereotactic Radiosurgery From 2014 to 2019: A UK Series. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2025; 38:103697. [PMID: 39638716 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.103697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 11/11/2024] [Accepted: 11/18/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) is standard practice in selected patients with small numbers of brain metastases (BMs). It is less accepted in those with ≥5 BMs, due to the lack of a prospective evidence base. While randomised trials are ongoing, we present the experience of a single UK cancer centre in using SRS/SRT for patients with 5 or more BMs without whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients undergoing treatment at a single centre between 2014 and 2019 were prospectively identified. All follow-up imaging was reviewed to identify any evidence of local failure or distant brain progression, which was analysed using a death-censored approach. RESULTS A total of N = 88 patients were included, with a median of seven BMs (range: 5-37). Post-SRS/SRT toxicity events occurred in 42%, most commonly reliance on steroids for ≥4 weeks (36% of the cohort). Median survival was 10 months, with median freedom from local failure and distant brain progression of 12 and 8 months, respectively; none of these outcomes differed significantly by the number of BMs. Brain-directed salvage treatment was required after a median of 21 months, and was not significantly associated with the number of BMs. CONCLUSION SRS/SRT alone may have a role in the management of selected patients with multiple BMs. Since the number of BMs were not significantly associated with overall survival or disease control, the National Health Service (NHS) commissioning criteria should continue to be based on tumour volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Benghiat
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
| | - J Hodson
- Research Development and Innovation, Institute of Translational Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Hickman
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Meade
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Hussein
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - R Stange
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - G Heyes
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - T Jackson
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - H Augustus
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Chavda
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - V Sawlani
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Ramalingham
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Bowen
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - A G Hartley
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - P Sanghera
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
van der Loo I, Bucho TMT, Hanley JA, Beets-Tan RGH, Imholz ALT, Trebeschi S. Measurement variability of radiologists when measuring brain tumors. Eur J Radiol 2025; 183:111874. [PMID: 39657547 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 12/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In oncology trials, response evaluation criteria are pivotal in developing new treatments. This study examines the influence of measurement variability in brain lesions on response classification, considering long-standing cut-offs for progression and response were determined before the era of submillimeter resolutions of medical imaging. METHODS We replicate a key study using modern radiological tools. Sixteen radiologists were tasked with measuring twelve near-spherical brain tumors using visual estimation (eyeballing), diameter measurements and artificial intelligence (AI) assisted segmentations. Analyses for inter- and intraobserver variability from the original were replicated. Additionally, we researched the effect of measurement error on the misclassification of progressive disease using a computer simulation model. RESULTS The combined effect of intra- and interobserver error varied between 13.6 and 22.2% for eyeballing and 6.8-7.2% for diameter measurement, using AI-assisted segmentation as reference. We observed erroneously declared progression (cut-off at 20% increase) in repeat measurements of the same tumor in 25.5% of instances for eyeballing and in 1.1% for diameter measurements. Response (cut-off at 30% decrease) was erroneously declared in 12.3% for eyeballing and in 0% for diameter measurements. The simulation model demonstrated a more pronounced impact of measurement error on cases with fewer total number of lesions. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a minimum expected measurement error using real-world data. The impact of measurement error on response evaluation criteria misclassification in brain lesions was most pronounced for eyeballing. Future research should focus on measurement error for different tumor types and assess its impact on response classification during patient follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris van der Loo
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GROW - Research Institute for Oncology & Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Teresa M Tareco Bucho
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GROW - Research Institute for Oncology & Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - James A Hanley
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GROW - Research Institute for Oncology & Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Alex L T Imholz
- Department of Oncology, Deventer Ziekenhuis, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - Stefano Trebeschi
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GROW - Research Institute for Oncology & Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rajkumar S, Kite T, Desai J, Lucido T, Mathieu D, Tripathi M, Singh N, Kumar N, Mantziaris G, Pikis S, Sheehan JP, Wegner RE, Shepard MJ. The 5-factor modified frailty index as a prognostic factor following stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic disease to the brain from non-small cell lung cancer: A multi-center cohort analysis. J Clin Neurosci 2025; 132:110979. [PMID: 39673841 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2024] [Revised: 12/03/2024] [Accepted: 12/05/2024] [Indexed: 12/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients often develop brain metastases (BMs), complicating management. We have shown that increasing frailty is associated with decreased overall survival (OS) and central nervous system progression free survival (PFS) for patients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to BMs. Leveraging the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation, we sought to expand upon these findings, in NSCLC specifically. METHODS Across four institutions, 193 patients with (≥1) NSCLC derived BMs with minimum 3 months of clinical/radiographic follow-up were analyzed. Primary outcomes included OS and PFS. Patients were stratified utilizing the mFI-5 into pre-frail (0-1), frail (2), and severely frail (3 + ). RESULTS Increased frailty was associated with diminished OS (frail hazard ratio (HR) = 2.49, 95 % CI [1.61-3.85]; severely frail HR = 2.65, 95 % CI [1.57-4.45]). The 6-month post-SRS survival rate was 86.1 %, 69.5 % and 54.5 % for pre-frail, frail and severely frail patients, respectively (p < 0.001). Frailty was not significantly predictive of time to PFS on multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards analysis although there was a trend towards diminished PFS with increasing frailty (median PFS was 18.4, 8.0, and 7.4 months for pre-frail, frail, and severely frail, respectively (p = 0.11). As age > 65 was also predictive of shorter OS (HR = 1.78, 95 % CI [1.23-2.56]). We generated a novel scoring system incorporating age and frailty status. The median survival of patients that scored 0, 1, 2, and 3 points were 21.1, 18.3, 8.9, and 5.6 months, respectively (p < 0.001). The area under the curve of the validation cohort using a logistic regression model was 0.77. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that the MFI-5 is a promising metric with application at the point of care to provide decision support for patients with NSCLC derived BMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujay Rajkumar
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Trent Kite
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network Neuroscience Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jay Desai
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Thomas Lucido
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David Mathieu
- Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Canada
| | - Manjul Tripathi
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Navneet Singh
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Narendra Kumar
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Georgios Mantziaris
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Stylianos Pikis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Rodney E Wegner
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew J Shepard
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network Neuroscience Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dessoude L, Lemaire R, Andres R, Leleu T, Leclercq AG, Desmonts A, Corroller T, Orou-Guidou AF, Laduree L, Henaff LL, Lacroix J, Lechervy A, Stefan D, Corroyer-Dulmont A. Development and routine implementation of deep learning algorithm for automatic brain metastases segmentation on MRI for RANO-BM criteria follow-up. Neuroimage 2025; 306:121002. [PMID: 39800174 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2024] [Revised: 12/13/2024] [Accepted: 01/06/2025] [Indexed: 01/15/2025] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The RANO-BM criteria, which employ a one-dimensional measurement of the largest diameter, are imperfect due to the fact that the lesion volume is neither isotropic nor homogeneous. Furthermore, this approach is inherently time-consuming. Consequently, in clinical practice, monitoring patients in clinical trials in compliance with the RANO-BM criteria is rarely achieved. The objective of this study was to develop and validate an AI solution capable of delineating brain metastases (BM) on MRI to easily obtain, using an in-house solution, RANO-BM criteria as well as BM volume in a routine clinical setting. MATERIALS (PATIENTS) AND METHODS A total of 27,456 post-Gadolinium-T1 MRI from 132 patients with BM were employed in this study. A deep learning (DL) model was constructed using the PyTorch and PyTorch Lightning frameworks, and the UNETR transfer learning method was employed to segment BM from MRI. RESULTS A visual analysis of the AI model results demonstrates confident delineation of the BM lesions. The model shows 100 % accuracy in predicting RANO-BM criteria in comparison to that of an expert medical doctor. There was a high degree of overlap between the AI and the doctor's segmentation, with a mean DICE score of 0.77. The diameter and volume of the BM lesions were found to be concordant between the AI and the reference segmentation. The user interface developed in this study can readily provide RANO-BM criteria following AI BM segmentation. CONCLUSION The in-house deep learning solution is accessible to everyone without expertise in AI and offers effective BM segmentation and substantial time savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loïse Dessoude
- Radiotherapy Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen 14000, France
| | - Raphaëlle Lemaire
- Medical Physics Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen 14000, France
| | - Romain Andres
- Medical Physics Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen 14000, France
| | - Thomas Leleu
- Radiotherapy Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen 14000, France
| | | | - Alexis Desmonts
- Radiotherapy Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen 14000, France
| | - Typhaine Corroller
- Medical Physics Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen 14000, France
| | | | - Luca Laduree
- Medical Physics Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen 14000, France
| | - Loic Le Henaff
- Radiology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen 14000, France
| | - Joëlle Lacroix
- Radiology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen 14000, France
| | - Alexis Lechervy
- ENSICAEN, CNRS, GREYC UMR6072, Normandie Université, Université Caen Normandie, Caen F-14000, France
| | - Dinu Stefan
- Radiotherapy Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen 14000, France
| | - Aurélien Corroyer-Dulmont
- Medical Physics Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen 14000, France; CNRS, ISTCT UMR6030, GIP CYCERON, Normandie Université, Université de Caen Normandie, Caen 14000, France.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Moreau NN, Valable S, Jaudet C, Dessoude L, Thomas L, Hérault R, Modzelewski R, Stefan D, Thariat J, Lechervy A, Corroyer-Dulmont A. Early characterization and prediction of glioblastoma and brain metastasis treatment efficacy using medical imaging-based radiomics and artificial intelligence algorithms. Front Oncol 2025; 15:1497195. [PMID: 39949753 PMCID: PMC11821606 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1497195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/07/2025] [Indexed: 02/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Among brain tumors, glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and the most aggressive type, and brain metastases (BMs) occur in 20%-40% of cancer patients. Even with intensive treatment involving radiotherapy and surgery, which frequently leads to cognitive decline due to doses on healthy brain tissue, the median survival is 15 months for GBM and about 6 to 9 months for BM. Despite these treatments, GBM patients respond heterogeneously as do patients with BM. Following standard of care, some patients will respond and have an overall survival of more than 30 months and others will not respond and will die within a few months. Differentiating non-responders from responders as early as possible in order to tailor treatment in a personalized medicine fashion to optimize tumor control and preserve healthy brain tissue is the most pressing unmet therapeutic challenge. Innovative computer solutions recently emerged and could provide help to this challenge. This review will focus on 52 published research studies between 2013 and 2024 on (1) the early characterization of treatment efficacy with biomarker imaging and radiomic-based solutions, (2) predictive solutions with radiomic and artificial intelligence-based solutions, (3) interest in other biomarkers, and (4) the importance of the prediction of new treatment modalities' efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noémie N. Moreau
- Medical Physics Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
- Université de Caen Normandie, CNRS, Normandie Université, ISTCT UMR6030, GIP CYCERON, Caen, France
| | - Samuel Valable
- Université de Caen Normandie, CNRS, Normandie Université, ISTCT UMR6030, GIP CYCERON, Caen, France
| | - Cyril Jaudet
- Medical Physics Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Loïse Dessoude
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Leleu Thomas
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Romain Hérault
- UMR GREYC, Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, ENSICAEN, CNRS, Caen, France
| | - Romain Modzelewski
- LITIS - EA4108-Quantif, University of Rouen, Rouen, France
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Henri Becquerel Center, Rouen, France
| | - Dinu Stefan
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
- ENSICAEN, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC UMR6534, Caen, France
| | - Alexis Lechervy
- UMR GREYC, Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, ENSICAEN, CNRS, Caen, France
| | - Aurélien Corroyer-Dulmont
- Medical Physics Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
- Université de Caen Normandie, CNRS, Normandie Université, ISTCT UMR6030, GIP CYCERON, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Fabi A, Rossi A, Caputo R, Pisegna S, Scagnoli S, Pantano F, D'Auria G, Fedele P, Fabbri A, Vernieri C, Palleschi M, Carbognin L, Ferretti G, Di Monte E, Paris I, Pavese F, Garrone O, Franco A, De Laurentiis M, Franceschini G, Scambia G, Giannarelli D, Masetti R, Botticelli A. Real life outcome analysis of breast cancer brain metastases treated with Trastuzumab Deruxtecan. NPJ Precis Oncol 2025; 9:22. [PMID: 39843642 PMCID: PMC11754752 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-025-00801-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 01/02/2025] [Indexed: 01/24/2025] Open
Abstract
Tumor dissemination to the central nervous system (CNS) is almost a rule in the treatment journey of advanced HER2+ breast cancer (BC). Recent results demonstrated high intracranial efficacy with Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd). However, a real-world evidence is lacking in literature. We conducted a multicenter, observational, retrospective real-world analysis on 39 cases collected at 12 Italian Oncological Units. Patients with brain metastases (BMs) from HER2 + BC treated with T-DXd in various treatment lines were enrolled. Primary endpoint was the intracranial overall response rate (iORR). Secondary endpoints were intra- and global progression free survival (iPFS - gPFS); other secondary objectives were the intracranial disease control rate (iDCR), duration of response (iDoR), clinical benefit rate at 6 and 12 months (iCBr), overall survival, and safety. iORR was 59%, iPFS was 15.6 months, gPFS was 11.8 months. iDCR was 94.9%, iDoR was 11.9 months, and iCBr at 6 and 12 months were 69.2% and 59%, respectively. OS was not reached, with an overall rate of 77.9% of patients alive at 12 months. This study confirmed the high intracranial efficacy and manageable safety profile of T-DXd in this first-ever real world analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Fabi
- Precision Medicine In Senology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Rossi
- Precision Medicine In Senology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Roberta Caputo
- Department Of Breast And Thoracic Oncology, Division Of Breast Medical Oncology, Istituto Di Ricovero E Cura A Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Simona Pisegna
- Department Of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University Of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Simone Scagnoli
- Department Of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University Of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Pantano
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuliana D'Auria
- Department Of Medical Oncology, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Palma Fedele
- Oncology Unit, Dario Camberlingo Hospital, Francavilla Fontana, Brindisi, Italy
| | - Agnese Fabbri
- Department Of Oncology And Hematology, Medical Oncology And Breast Unit, Central Hospital Of Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Claudio Vernieri
- Department Of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Irccs Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Michela Palleschi
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori "Dino Amadori" Irst, Meldola, Italy
| | - Luisa Carbognin
- Precision Medicine In Senology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Department Of Woman And Child Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Ferretti
- Medical Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Di Monte
- Department Of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ida Paris
- Department Of Woman And Child Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Pavese
- Department Of Woman And Child Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ornella Garrone
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Franco
- Breast Unit, Department Of Woman And Child's Health And Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Irccs, Rome, Italy
| | - Michelino De Laurentiis
- Department Of Breast And Thoracic Oncology, Division Of Breast Medical Oncology, Istituto Di Ricovero E Cura A Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluca Franceschini
- Breast Unit, Department Of Woman And Child's Health And Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Irccs, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department Of Woman And Child Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Diana Giannarelli
- Facility Of Epidemiology And Biostatistics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Masetti
- Breast Unit, Department Of Woman And Child's Health And Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Irccs, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Botticelli
- Department Of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University Of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ohguri T, Itamura H, Tani S, Shiba E, Yamamoto J. High incidence of radiation-induced brain necrosis in the periventricular deep white matter: stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases using volumetric modulated arc therapy. Radiat Oncol 2025; 20:4. [PMID: 39780156 PMCID: PMC11715558 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02579-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2024] [Accepted: 12/29/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and incidence of radiation-induced brain necrosis (RBN) after volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic irradiation (VMAT-STI) for brain metastases. METHODS In the 220 brain metastatic lesions included between January 2020 and June 2022, there were 1-9 concurrently treated lesions (median 1). A biologically effective dose (BED)10 of 80 Gy and a reduced BED10 of 50 Gy were prescribed to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and planning target volume (PTV) (PTV = GTV + 3 mm) margins, respectively. The number of fractions was adjusted from 3 to 15 to accommodate different GTV sizes; for larger tumor volumes, this was increased while maintaining the BED10 values comparable to those for GTV and PTV margins. RESULTS Of the total patients, 16 (7%) exhibited locally progressive lesions; local tumor recurrence was observed in 2 (1%) patients, while RBN was noted in 14 (6%) patients. RBN was significantly more prevalent in the deep white matter around the lateral ventricles (DWM-LV) than in other sites, occurring in 9/22 (41%) lesions of metastases in the DWM-LV. The 2-year actuarial incidence risk of developing RBN was significantly higher in the DWM-LV (69%) than at other sites (5%). CONCLUSION The recurrence rate of brain metastases was low, and the incidence of RBN was lower in tumor sites other than the DWM-LV. However, the frequency of RBN was significantly higher in the DWM-LV region. Additional VMAT-STI-prescribed dose protocols are necessary to reduce RBN incidence in DWM-LVs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayuki Ohguri
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Hospital of the University of Occupational and Environmental Heath, Kitakyushu, Japan.
| | - Hirohide Itamura
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Hospital of the University of Occupational and Environmental Heath, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Subaru Tani
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Hospital of the University of Occupational and Environmental Heath, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Eiji Shiba
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Hospital of the University of Occupational and Environmental Heath, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Junkoh Yamamoto
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Heyn C, Bishop J, Moody AR, Kang T, Wong E, Howard P, Maralani P, Symons S, MacIntosh BJ, Keith J, Lim-Fat MJ, Perry J, Myrehaug S, Detsky J, Tseng CL, Chen H, Sahgal A, Soliman H. Gadolinium-Enhanced T2 FLAIR Is an Imaging Biomarker of Radiation Necrosis and Tumor Progression in Patients with Brain Metastases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2025; 46:129-135. [PMID: 39107039 PMCID: PMC11735435 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a8431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 08/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Differentiating radiation necrosis (RN) from tumor progression (TP) after radiation therapy for brain metastases is an important clinical problem requiring advanced imaging techniques that may not be widely available and are challenging to perform at multiple time points. The ability to leverage conventional MRI for this problem could have a meaningful clinical impact. The purpose of this study was to explore contrast-enhanced T2 FLAIR (T2FLAIRc) as a new imaging biomarker of RN and TP. MATERIALS AND METHODS This single-institution retrospective study included patients with treated brain metastases undergoing DSC-MRI between January 2021 and June 2023. Reference standard assessment was based on histopathology or serial follow-up, including the results of DSC-MRI for a minimum of 6 months from the first DSC-MRI. The index test was implemented as part of the institutional brain tumor MRI protocol and preceded the first DSC-MRI. T2FLAIRc and gadolinium-enhanced T1 (T1c) MPRAGE signal were normalized against normal brain parenchyma and expressed as a z score. The mean signal intensity of enhancing disease for the RN and TP groups was compared using an unpaired t test. Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were derived by bootstrapping. The DeLong test was used to compare AUCs. RESULTS Fifty-six participants (mean age, 62 [SD, 12.7] years; 39 women; 28 with RN, 28 with TP) were evaluated. The index MRI was performed, on average, 73 [SD, 34] days before the first DSC-MRI. Significantly higher z scores were found for RN using T2FLAIRc (8.3 versus 5.8, P < .001) and T1c (4.1 versus 3.5, P = .02). The AUC for T2FLAIRc (0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.92) was greater than that for T1c (0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.83) (P = .04). The AUC of DSC-derived relative CBV (0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.93) was not significantly different from that of T2FLAIRc (P = .9). CONCLUSIONS A higher normalized T1c and T2FLAIRc signal intensity was found for RN. In a univariable test, the mean T2FLAIRc signal intensity of enhancing voxels showed good discrimination performance for distinguishing RN from TP. The results of this work demonstrate the potential of T2FLAIRc as an imaging biomarker in the work-up of RN in patients with brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Heyn
- From the Department of Medical Imaging (C.H., J.B., A.R.M., T.K., E.W., P.H., P.M., S.S.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging (C.H., A.R.M., T.K., E.W., P.H., P.M., S.S.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (C.H., A.R.M., P.M., S.S., B.J.M.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan Bishop
- From the Department of Medical Imaging (C.H., J.B., A.R.M., T.K., E.W., P.H., P.M., S.S.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alan R Moody
- From the Department of Medical Imaging (C.H., J.B., A.R.M., T.K., E.W., P.H., P.M., S.S.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging (C.H., A.R.M., T.K., E.W., P.H., P.M., S.S.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (C.H., A.R.M., P.M., S.S., B.J.M.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tony Kang
- From the Department of Medical Imaging (C.H., J.B., A.R.M., T.K., E.W., P.H., P.M., S.S.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging (C.H., A.R.M., T.K., E.W., P.H., P.M., S.S.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erin Wong
- From the Department of Medical Imaging (C.H., J.B., A.R.M., T.K., E.W., P.H., P.M., S.S.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging (C.H., A.R.M., T.K., E.W., P.H., P.M., S.S.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Howard
- From the Department of Medical Imaging (C.H., J.B., A.R.M., T.K., E.W., P.H., P.M., S.S.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging (C.H., A.R.M., T.K., E.W., P.H., P.M., S.S.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pejman Maralani
- From the Department of Medical Imaging (C.H., J.B., A.R.M., T.K., E.W., P.H., P.M., S.S.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging (C.H., A.R.M., T.K., E.W., P.H., P.M., S.S.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (C.H., A.R.M., P.M., S.S., B.J.M.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sean Symons
- From the Department of Medical Imaging (C.H., J.B., A.R.M., T.K., E.W., P.H., P.M., S.S.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging (C.H., A.R.M., T.K., E.W., P.H., P.M., S.S.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (C.H., A.R.M., P.M., S.S., B.J.M.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bradley J MacIntosh
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (C.H., A.R.M., P.M., S.S., B.J.M.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julia Keith
- Department of Anatomy and Pathology (J.K.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto Ontario, Canada
| | - Mary Jane Lim-Fat
- Division of Neurology (M.J.L-F, J.P.), Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James Perry
- Division of Neurology (M.J.L-F, J.P.), Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology (S.M., J.D., C.-L.T., H.C., A.S., H.S.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jay Detsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology (S.M., J.D., C.-L.T., H.C., A.S., H.S.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology (S.M., J.D., C.-L.T., H.C., A.S., H.S.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (S.M., J.D., C.-L.T., H.C., A.S., H.S.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology (S.M., J.D., C.-L.T., H.C., A.S., H.S.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology (S.M., J.D., C.-L.T., H.C., A.S., H.S.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Weller M, Le Rhun E, Tsamtsouri L, Dummer R, Guckenberger M, Ribi K, di Giacomo AM, Minuti G, Collazo-Lorduy A, Brandsma D, O'Brien M, Ermis E, Fischer N, Ascierto P, Mandala M, Minniti G, Iranzo P, Roschitzki-Voser H, Ruepp B, Grolimund E, Dafni U, Peters S, Stahel R. Immunotherapy or targeted therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases from melanoma or non-small cell lung cancer - The ETOP 19-21 USZ-STRIKE study. Lung Cancer 2025; 199:108069. [PMID: 39731865 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.108069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2024] [Accepted: 12/19/2024] [Indexed: 12/30/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Weller
- University Hospital Zürich, Department of Neurology, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- University Hospital Zürich, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Lydia Tsamtsouri
- ETOP Statistical Office, Frontier-Science Foundation Hellas, Athens, Greece
| | - Reinhard Dummer
- University Hospital Zürich, Department of Dermatology, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Karin Ribi
- Coordinating Center, ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Anna Maria di Giacomo
- University of Siena, Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Italy
| | - Gabriele Minuti
- Clinical Trial Unit: Phase 1 and Precision Medicine, IRCCS, National Cancer Institute, Regina Elena, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Dieta Brandsma
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ekin Ermis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Paolo Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Mandala
- University of Perugia, Medical Oncology Unit, Santa Maria Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Patricia Iranzo
- Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Barbara Ruepp
- Coordinating Center, ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Eva Grolimund
- Coordinating Center, ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Urania Dafni
- ETOP Statistical Office, Frontier-Science Foundation Hellas, Athens, Greece; National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Rolf Stahel
- Coordinating Center, ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rashid NS, Lamba N, Catalano PJ, Bi WL, Arnaout O, Tanguturi SK, Rahman R, Haas-Kogan DA, Lin NU, Wen PY, Aizer AA. Intracranial outcomes following neurosurgical resection in patients with brain metastases secondary to HER2-positive breast cancer versus other subtypes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2025; 209:303-314. [PMID: 39367951 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07493-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2024] [Accepted: 09/06/2024] [Indexed: 10/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Neurosurgical resection serves an important role in select patients with breast cancer and brain metastases but can delay systemic therapy and yield complications. Consequently, identification of patients most likely to benefit from surgery is important. Given the poorer long-term intracranial responses to radiotherapy sometimes observed in HER2-positive (HER2 +) patients, we investigated whether neurosurgical resection is differentially beneficial in this population. METHODS We identified 633 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases arising from breast cancer managed at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 2010 and 2022. Patients were stratified by breast cancer subtype: HER2 + (N = 189), hormone receptor positive (HR +)/HER2- (N = 267), and triple negative (N = 177). Per-patient and per-metastasis outcomes were evaluated; interaction models assessing the impact of neurosurgical resection by subtype were constructed. RESULTS Relative to HR + /HER2- subtype, omission of upfront neurosurgical resection in patients with HER2 + disease was associated with increased subsequent utilization of salvage stereotactic radiation, whole brain radiotherapy, and craniotomy (interaction HR 2.02 [95% CI, 1.04-3.93], p = 0.04; HR 3.92 [95% CI, 1.24-12.40], p = 0.02; HR 4.98 [95% CI, 1.34-18.58], p = 0.02, respectively). Tumors stemming from HER2 + versus HR + /HER2- primaries displayed increased local recurrence when upfront neurosurgical resection was omitted (interaction HR 3.62 [95% CI, 1.06-12.38], p = 0.04). No such associations were noted when comparing triple negative to HR + /HER2- subtype (p-interaction > 0.05 in all cases). CONCLUSION Patients with HER2 + disease and brain metastases may disproportionately benefit from upfront neurosurgical resection relative to other subtypes. If validated, our results may suggest a lower threshold to consider surgery in brain metastases secondary to HER2 + breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nayan Lamba
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Paul J Catalano
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wenya Linda Bi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Omar Arnaout
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shyam K Tanguturi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Rifaquat Rahman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Daphne A Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ayal A Aizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Grinda T, Aizer AA, Lin NU, Sammons SL. Central Nervous System Metastases in Breast Cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2025; 26:14-35. [PMID: 39786689 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01286-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2025]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Breast cancer metastasizing to the central nervous system (CNS) encompasses two distinct entities: brain metastases involving the cerebral parenchyma and infiltration of the leptomeningeal space, i.e., leptomeningeal disease. CNS metastases affect 10-15% of patients with hormone receptor-positive-status and nearly one-half of those with HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer with distant metastatic disease. Significant clinical morbidity and heterogeneous penetration of the blood-brain barrier by systemic therapies contribute to the poor prognosis associated with brain metastases. Recent advances in radiotherapy, including stereotactic approaches and morbidity-reducing strategies such as the use of memantine and hippocampal avoidance in whole brain radiation, coupled with the development of more effective CNS-penetrant systemic therapies, including small molecules and antibody-drug conjugates, have significantly improved patient outcomes. Consequently, patients with breast cancer CNS metastases have improved survival compared to prior decades, and longitudinal care has become increasingly complex, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach to achieve optimal outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Grinda
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ayal A Aizer
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah L Sammons
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Andrearczyk V, Schiappacasse L, Raccaud M, Bourhis J, Prior JO, Cuendet MA, Hottinger AF, Dunet V, Depeursinge A. The value of AI for assessing longitudinal brain metastases treatment response. Neurooncol Adv 2025; 7:vdae216. [PMID: 39896076 PMCID: PMC11786217 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Effective follow-up of brain metastasis (BM) patients post-treatment is crucial for adapting therapies and detecting new lesions. Current guidelines (Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-BM) have limitations, such as patient-level assessments and arbitrary lesion selection, which may not reflect outcomes in high tumor burden cases. Accurate, reproducible, and automated response assessments can improve follow-up decisions, including (1) optimizing re-treatment timing to avoid treating responding lesions or delaying treatment of progressive ones, and (2) enhancing precision in evaluating responses during clinical trials. Methods We compared manual and automatic (deep learning-based) lesion contouring using unidimensional and volumetric criteria. Analysis focused on (1) agreement in size and RANO-BM categories, (2) stability of measurements under scanner rotations and over time, and (3) predictability of 1-year outcomes. The study included 49 BM patients, with 184 MRI studies and 448 lesions, retrospectively assessed by radiologists. Results Automatic contouring and volumetric criteria demonstrated superior stability (P < .001 for rotation; P < .05 over time) and better outcome predictability compared to manual methods. These approaches reduced observer variability, offering reliable and efficient response assessments. The best outcome predictability, defined as 1-year response, was achieved using automatic contours and volumetric measurements. These findings highlight the potential of automated tools to streamline clinical workflows and provide consistency across evaluators, regardless of expertise. Conclusion Automatic BM contouring and volumetric measurements provide promising tools to improve follow-up and treatment decisions in BM management. By enhancing precision and reproducibility, these methods can streamline clinical workflows and improve the evaluation of response in trials and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Andrearczyk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute of Informatics, HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Sierre, Switzerland
| | - Luis Schiappacasse
- Lundin Family Brain Tumor Research Centre, Departments of Oncology & Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Matthieu Raccaud
- Department of Medical Radiology, Service of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Neuroradiology Unit, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Lundin Family Brain Tumor Research Centre, Departments of Oncology & Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - John O Prior
- Lundin Family Brain Tumor Research Centre, Departments of Oncology & Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Michel A Cuendet
- Lundin Family Brain Tumor Research Centre, Departments of Oncology & Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Andreas F Hottinger
- Lundin Family Brain Tumor Research Centre, Departments of Oncology & Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Vincent Dunet
- Lundin Family Brain Tumor Research Centre, Departments of Oncology & Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Medical Radiology, Service of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Neuroradiology Unit, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Adrien Depeursinge
- Lundin Family Brain Tumor Research Centre, Departments of Oncology & Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute of Informatics, HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Sierre, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Pham DQ, Sheehan DE, Sheehan KA, Katsos K, Fadul CE. Quality of life after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastasis: an assessment from a prospective national registry. J Neurooncol 2025; 171:383-391. [PMID: 39432027 PMCID: PMC11695642 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04854-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2024] [Accepted: 10/08/2024] [Indexed: 10/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is frequently used in the management of brain metastasis patients. However, there is an urgent need to evaluate post-treatment outcomes and quality of life metrics for patients undergoing SRS for brain metastases. METHODS The NeuroPoint Alliance (NPA) SRS Quality Registry conducted prospective enrollment of patients undergoing SRS from 2017 to 2024. Patients with brain metastases from lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma were included in the analysis. Outcomes of interest included quality of life metrics, as captured by the five-dimension Euro-QOL (EQ-5D) at 6-12 months and last record follow-up, overall survival, local progression, out-of-field progression, and overall intracranial progression. RESULTS 522 patients comprised our analytic cohort, and 315 patients had available EQ-5D data at the time of SRS and final follow-up. 264 (47.8%), 197 (35.7%), and 91 (16.5%) patients had 1, 2-4, and 5-14 lesions pre-SRS, respectively. The median overall survival time from diagnosis was 27.3 months. The median time-to-local progression was not reached. At final follow-up, 107 (34.0%) patients had improvement, 51 (16.2%) patients had stable, and 113 patients (35.9%) had worsening EQ-5D scores when compared to baseline. For 44 (13.9%) patients mixed responses across the EQ-5D indices were reported. Linear regression analysis showed that male sex, smoking status, primary tumor type, time-to-overall progression, cumulative intracranial tumor volume (CITV), and baseline EQ-5D were statistically significantly associated with EQ-5D single index at the final follow-up. CONCLUSION Real-world data from the SRS NPA Registry demonstrated that most patients with brain metastasis had no change or improvement in quality of life after SRS. Baseline EQ-5D was predictive of EQ-5D single index at final follow-up, and, as such, EQ-5D at baseline would be a valuable assessment measure for brain metastasis patients undergoing SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duy Q Pham
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
- University of Virginia School of Medicine Inova Campus, 3300 Gallows Road, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA.
| | - Darrah E Sheehan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Kimball A Sheehan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Camilo E Fadul
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Krämer A, Hahnemann L, Schunn F, Grott CA, Thomas M, Christopoulos P, Lischalk JW, Hörner-Rieber J, Hoegen-Saßmannshausen P, Eichkorn T, Deng MY, Meixner E, Lang K, Paul A, Weykamp F, Debus J, König L. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of brainstem metastases - Clinical outcome and prognostic factors. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2025; 50:100893. [PMID: 39651456 PMCID: PMC11621500 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2024] [Revised: 11/17/2024] [Accepted: 11/17/2024] [Indexed: 12/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Brain metastases (BM) are the most common malignancy in the central nervous system (CNS) and observed in approximately 30% of cancer patients. Brainstem metastases (BSM) are challenging because of their location and the associated neurological risks. There are still no general therapeutic recommendations in this setting. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is one of few possible local therapy options but limited due to the tolerance dose of the brainstem. There is still no standard regarding the optimal dose und fractionation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 65 patients with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) for 69 BSM. FSRT was delivered at a dose of 30 Gy in six fractions prescribed to the 70 % isodose performed with Cyberknife. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC) and total intracranial brain control (TIBC) were analyzed via Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify prognostic factors. Results Median follow-up was 27.3 months. One-year TIBC was 35.0 % and one-year LC was 84.1 %. Median OS was 8.9 months. In total, local progression occurred in 7.7 % and in 8.2 % symptomatic radiation-induced contrast enhancements (RICE) were diagnosed. In univariate analysis the Karnofsky performance scale index (KPI) (p = 0,001) was an independent prognostic factor for longer OS. Acute CTCAE grade 3 toxicities occurred in 18.4 %. Conclusion FSRT for BSM is as an effective and safe treatment approach with high LC rates and reasonable neurological toxicity despite the poor prognosis in this patient cohort is still very poor. Clinical and imaging follow-up is necessary to identify cerebral progression and adverse toxicity including RICE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Krämer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laura Hahnemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Schunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph A. Grott
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Thomas
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik and National Center for Tumor Diseases at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Germany
| | - Petros Christopoulos
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik and National Center for Tumor Diseases at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Germany
| | - Jonathan W. Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Health at Long Island, New York, NY, USA
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology (E050), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Eichkorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Y. Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Angela Paul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology (E050), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology (E050), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|