Ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, gastro-oesophageal cancer, or urothelial carcinomas (JVDF): a multicohort, non-randomised, open-label, phase 1a/b trial

Efficacy of ramucirumab combination chemotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction after exposure to checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy as first-line therapy

FOLFOX plus nivolumab represents a standard of care for first-line therapy of advanced gastroesophageal cancer (aGEC) with positive PD-L1 expression. The efficacy of second-line VEGFR-2 inhibition with ramucirumab (RAM) plus chemotherapy after progression to immunochemotherapy remains unclear. Medical records of patients with aGEC enrolled in the randomized phase II AIO-STO-0417 trial after treatment failure to first-line FOLFOX plus nivolumab and ipilimumab were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on second-line therapy: RAM plus chemotherapy (RAM group) or treatment without RAM (control group). Eighty three patients were included. In the overall population, progression-free survival (PFS) in the RAM group was superior to the control (4.5 vs 2.9 months). Responders (CR/PR) to first-line immunochemotherapy receiving RAM containing second-line therapy had prolonged OS from start of first-line therapy (28.9 vs 16.5 months), as well as second-line OS (9.6 vs 7.5 months), PFS (5.6 vs 2.9 months) and DCR (53% vs 29%) compared to the control. PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was 42% and 44% for the RAM and the control, respectively. Patients with CPS ≥1 in the RAM group showed better tumor control (ORR 25% vs 10%) and improved survival (total OS 11.5 vs 8.0 months; second-line OS 6.5 vs 3.9 months; PFS 4.5 vs 1.6 months) compared to the control. Prior exposure to first-line FOLFOX plus dual checkpoint inhibition followed by RAM plus chemotherapy shows favorable response and survival rates especially in patients with initial response and positive PD-L1 expression and has the potential to advance the treatment paradigm in aGEC.

Plasma sPD-L1 and VEGF levels are associated with the prognosis of NSCLC patients treated with combination immunotherapy

The clinical significance of plasma soluble programmed cell death ligand 1 (sPD-L1) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with the combination of anti-angiogenic therapy and anti-PD-L1 antibody (Ab) remain unknown. This study aimed to explore the association between plasma sPD-L1 and VEGF levels and the prognosis of NSCLC patients treated with the combination of Envafolimab and Endostar. Peripheral blood samples were collected from 24 NSCLC patients at baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment and were detected for sPD-L1 and VEGF levels. Both baseline and posttreatment sPD-L1 were significantly higher in progressive disease (PD) group than in controlled disease (CD) group (median: 77.5 pg/ml vs. 64.6 pg/ml, P  = 0.036, median: 8451 pg/ml vs. 5563 pg/ml, P  = 0.012). In multivariate analysis, lower baseline sPD-L1 levels were significantly associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 6.834, 95% CI: 1.350-34.592, P  = 0.020). There were significantly higher posttreatment VEGF levels in PD group compared with CD group (median: 323.7 pg/ml vs. 178.5 pg/ml, P  = 0.009). Higher posttreatment VEGF levels were significantly associated with shorter PFS in multivariate analysis (HR = 5.911, 95% CI: 1.391-25.122, P  = 0.016). Plasma sPD-L1 and VEGF levels are associated with the clinical response and prognosis of NSCLC patients treated with the combination of PD-L1 inhibitors and anti-angiogenetic therapy.

Immunotherapy combined with apatinib in the treatment of advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy or apatinib alone has been used as third-line adjuvant therapy for advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) tumors, but the efficacy of combining them with each other for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ is unknown; therefore, we further evaluated the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy combined with apatinib in patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ.

METHODS

The main search was conducted on published databases: Embase, Cochrane library, PubMed.The search was conducted from the establishment of the database to December 2023.Clinical trials with patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ and immunotherapy combined with apatinib as the study variable were collected. Review Manager 5.4 software as well as stata 15.0 software were used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 651 patients from 19 articles were included in this meta-analysis. In the included studies, immunotherapy combined with apatinib had a complete response (CR) of 0.03 (95% CI: 0.00 -0.06), partial response (PR) of 0.34 (95% CI: 0.19-0.49), stable disease (SD) of 0.43 (95% CI: 0.32-0.55), objective response rate (ORR) was 0.36 (95% CI: 0.23-0.48), disease control rate (DCR) was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.86), and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.29 (95% CI: 4.05-4.52), median Overall survival (OS) was 8.79 (95% CI: 7.92-9.66), and the incidence of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs was 0.34 (95% CI: 0:19-0.49). PR, ORR, DCR, median PFS and median OS were significantly higher in the immunotherapy and apatinib combination chemotherapy group (IAC) than in the immunotherapy combination apatinib group (IA). And the difference was not significant in the incidence of SD and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis shows that immunotherapy combined with apatinib is safe and effective in the treatment of advanced or metastatic G/GEJ, where IAC can be a recommended adjuvant treatment option for patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ. However, more large multicenter randomized studies are urgently needed to reveal the long-term outcomes of immunotherapy combined with apatinib treatment.

Efficacy and safety of novel immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have an exceptionally poor prognosis and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with etoposide-platinum is recommended as standard first-line therapy. However, which combination pattern is the best still remains unknown. This network meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of currently available patterns including an antiangiogenic agent containing regimen and probed into the most appropriate therapy for patients.

METHODS

Hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) were generated using R software. The outcomes of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events of grade 3 or higher (grade ≥ 3 adverse events [AEs]) were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 5544 patients were included for analysis. Drug combination patterns included adebrelimab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, serplulimab, benmelstobart plus anlotinib, tislelizumab, tiragolumab plus atezolizumab and toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy. The novel antiangiogenic agent containing regimen benmelstobart + anlotinib + chemotherapy showed the highest possibility to present the best PFS and OS versus chemotherapy. Compared with ICI plus chemotherapy, it also achieved significantly better PFS and presented a tendency of OS benefit. As for safety and toxicity, patients treated with benmelstobart + anlotinib + chemotherapy and durvalumab + tremelimumab + chemotherapy suffered a higher likelihood of more grade ≥ 3 AEs without unexpected AEs.

CONCLUSION

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors-based combinations are associated with significant improvement in both PFS and OS for treatment-naïve ES-SCLC patients. Benmelstobart plus anlotinib with chemotherapy (CT) yielded better survival benefit versus CT alone or other ICIs + CT with caution for more adverse effects along with the addition of an antiangiogenic agent.

Gastric Cancer, Immunotherapy, and Nutrition: The Role of Microbiota

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of gastric cancer (GC), which still represents the third leading cause of cancer-related death in Western countries. However, ICI treatment outcomes vary between individuals and need to be optimized. Recent studies have shown that gut microbiota could represent a key influencer of immunotherapy responses. At the same time, the nutritional status and diet of GC patients are also predictive of immunotherapy treatment response and survival outcomes. The objective of this narrative review is to gather recent findings about the complex relationships between the oral, gastric, and gut bacterial communities, dietary factors/nutritional parameters, and immunotherapy responses. Perigastric/gut microbiota compositions/functions and their metabolites could be predictive of response to immunotherapy in GC patients and even overall survival. At the same time, the strong influence of diet on the composition of the microbiota could have consequences on immunotherapy responses through the impact of muscle mass in GC patients during immunotherapy. Future studies are needed to define more precisely the dietary factors, such as adequate daily intake of prebiotics, that could counteract the dysbiosis of the GC microbiota and the impaired nutritional status, improving the clinical outcomes of GC patients during immunotherapy.

Current and Future Therapeutic Targets for Directed Molecular Therapies in Cholangiocarcinoma

We conducted a comprehensive review of the current literature of published data, clinical trials (MEDLINE; ncbi.pubmed.com), congress contributions (asco.org; esmo.org), and active recruiting clinical trains (clinicaltrial.gov) on targeted therapies in cholangiocarcinoma. Palliative treatment regimens were analyzed as well as preoperative and perioperative treatment options. We summarized the current knowledge for each mutation and molecular pathway that is or has been under clinical evaluation and discussed the results on the background of current treatment guidelines. We established and recommended targeted treatment options that already exist for second-line settings, including IDH-, BRAF-, and NTRK-mutated tumors, as well as for FGFR2 fusion, HER2/neu-overexpression, and microsatellite instable tumors. Other options for targeted treatment include EGFR- or VEGF-dependent pathways, which are known to be overexpressed or dysregulated in this cancer type and are currently under clinical investigation. Targeted therapy in CCA is a hallmark of individualized medicine as these therapies aim to specifically block pathways that promote cancer cell growth and survival, leading to tumor shrinkage and improved patient outcomes based on the molecular profile of the tumor.

Gene features of tumor-specific T cells relevant to immunotherapy, targeted therapy and chemotherapy in lung cancer

1 Background

In lung cancer, the use of small-molecule inhibitors, chemotherapy and immunotherapy has led to unprecedented survival benefits in selected patients. Considering most patients will experience a relapse within a short period of time due to single drug resistance, combination therapy is also particularly important to improve patient prognosis. Therefore, more robust biomarkers to predict responses to immunotherapy, targeted therapy, chemotherapy and rationally drug combination therapies may be helpful in clinical treatment choices.

2 Methods

We defined tumor-specific T cells (TSTs) and their features (TSTGs) by single-cell RNA sequencing. We applied LASSO regression to filter out the most survival-relevant TSTGs to form the Tumor-specific T cell score (TSTS). Immunological characteristics, enriched pathways, and mutation were evaluated in high- and low TSTS groups.

3 Results

We identified six clusters of T cells as TSTs in lung cancer, and four most robust genes from 9 feature genes expressed only on tumor-specific T cells were screened to construct a tumor-specific T cells score (TSTS). TSTS was positively correlated with immune infiltration and angiogenesis and negatively correlated with malignant cell proliferation. Moreover, potential vascular-immune crosstalk in lung cancer provides the theoretical basis for combined anti-angiogenic and immunotherapy. Noticeable, patients in high TSTS had better response to ICB and targeted therapy and patients in the low TSTS group often benefit from chemotherapy.

4 Conclusion

The proposed TSTS is a promising indicator to predict immunotherapy, targeted therapy and chemotherapy responses in lung cancer patients for helping clinical treatment choices.

Incidence of thromboembolic events in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

The incidence of thromboembolic events (TEs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has rarely been reported. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched. The primary outcome was the incidence of TEs, and the secondary outcome was the relationship between TEs and overall survival (OS) following ICI therapy. A subgroup analysis of TE incidents was performed according to the TE type and combination regimens. The I2 statistic was used to determine the heterogeneity, and funnel plots and Egger's test were used to assess publication bias. A total of 16,602 patients with NSCLC in 63 experimental arms were included in the analysis. The rate of TEs ranged from 0.1% to 13.8%, and the pooled overall incidence of all-grade TEs was 3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2%-4%). The pooled rate of high-grade TEs was 1% (95% CI, 1%-2%). The venous and arterial TE rates were 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%) and 1% (95% CI, 1%-2%), respectively. Patients who received immunotherapy + chemoradiotherapy had the highest incidence of TEs (7%). The TE pooled rate was higher in patients treated with combined ICIs than in those treated with mono ICIs (4% vs. 2%). The OS was lower in patients with TEs than in those without TEs (hazard ratio, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.02%-1.92%). The incidence of TEs in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs was reasonable. Nonetheless, clinicians must be aware of potential thrombotic complications and treat them promptly.

Clinical immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer remains a challenging disease with limited treatment options, resulting in high mortality rates. The predominant approach to managing pancreatic cancer patients continues to be systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy. Despite substantial advancements in immunotherapy strategies for various cancers, their clinical utility in pancreatic cancer has proven less effective and durable. Whether administered as monotherapy, employing immune checkpoint inhibitors, tumor vaccines, chimeric antigen receptors T cells, or in combination with conventional chemoradiotherapy, the clinical outcomes remain underwhelming. Extensive preclinical experiments and clinical trials in the realm of pancreatic cancer have provided valuable insights into the complexities of immunotherapy. Chief among the hurdles are the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, limited immunogenicity, and the inherent heterogeneity of pancreatic cancer. In this comprehensive review, we provide an overview and critical analysis of current clinical immunotherapy strategies for pancreatic cancer, emphasizing their endeavors to overcome immunotherapy resistance. Particular focus is placed on strategies aimed at reshaping the immunosuppressive microenvironment and enhancing T cell-mediated tumor cell killing. Ultimately, through deeper elucidation of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of pancreatic cancer and the refinement of therapeutic approaches, we anticipate breakthroughs that will pave the way for more effective treatments in this challenging disease.

Efficacy of ramucirumab and subsequent nivolumab therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective study

Nivolumab monotherapy is a standard treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, and this type of cancer involves vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling in the tumor immunological environment. The subgroup analysis of the ATTRACTION-2 trial revealed that prior treatment with ramucirumab (RAM), a VEGF inhibitor, affected the therapeutic effect of nivolumab. The present retrospective study aimed to review patients with metastatic gastric cancer who were treated with paclitaxel (PTX) and RAM followed by nivolumab. A total of 29 patients with metastatic gastric cancer were treated with PTX + RAM as second-line treatment, followed by nivolumab monotherapy as third-line treatment. The therapeutic efficacy of nivolumab was compared in 13 patients with progression-free survival (PFS) of <5 months and 16 patients with PFS ≥5 months after PTX + RAM therapy. The present study included 22 male and seven female patients, with a median age of 68 years (range, 45-82 years). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positivity was observed in six patients. The disease control rate was 62.1%. The PFS and overall survival (OS) were 4.4 and 11.9 months, respectively. Patients with PFS ≥5 months after PTX + RAM therapy showed better outcome in both PFS (5.3 months vs. 2.8 months, P=0.039) and OS (6.9 months vs. 15.2 months, P=0.066) after nivolumab treatment than patients with PFS of <5 months after PTX + RAM therapy. However, no significant relationship was observed between the outcome of first-line treatment and nivolumab. The therapeutic effect of nivolumab was associated with prior PTX + RAM treatment in advanced gastric cancer.

A Phase 1b Study of Ivonescimab, a Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Bispecific Antibody, as First- or Second-Line Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Immunotherapy-Naive NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

This study (HARMONi-5) aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ivonescimab (a bispecific antibody against programmed cell death protein 1 and vascular endothelial growth factor) as first- or second-line monotherapy in patients with advanced immunotherapy-naive NSCLC.

METHODS

Eligible patients received intravenous ivonescimab 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks (Q3W), 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W), 20 mg/kg Q3W, or 30 mg/kg Q3W. The primary end points were safety and objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.

RESULTS

At data cutoff (October 5, 2022), 108 patients were enrolled and received ivonescimab. Programmed death ligand-1 tumor proportion score (TPS) was greater than or equal to 1% in 74 patients (68.5%), including 35 (32.4%) with TPS greater than or equal to 50%. The median follow-up was 10.4 months (range: 8.4-10.9 mo). For all patients, ORR and disease control rate were 39.8% and 86.1%, respectively. ORR by TPS was 14.7%, 51.4%, and 57.1% in patients with TPS less than 1%, greater than or equal to 1%, and greater than or equal to 50%, respectively. In the 67 programmed death ligand-1-positive patients receiving first-line ivonescimab, the ORR was 33.3%, 52.6%, 60.0%, and 75.0% at the doses of 10 mg/kg Q3W, 20 mg/kg Q2W, 20 mg/kg Q3W, and 30 mg/kg Q3W, respectively. Grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 24 patients (22.2%). TRAEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in one patient (0.9%). TRAEs leading to death occurred in three patients (2.8%) with squamous NSCLC. The occurrence of grade greater than or equal to 3 TRAEs and grade greater than or equal to 3 bleeding events in squamous versus nonsquamous NSCLC patients was 25.5% versus 18.9% and 0.0% versus 1.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ivonescimab monotherapy was well tolerated and found to have a promising efficacy in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov identifier: NCT04900363.

Endostar acts as a pneumonitis protectant in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

CCRT is presently the standard treatment for LA-NSCLC. RP is one of the main obstacles to the completion of thoracic radiation therapy, resulting in limited survival benefits in NSCLC patients. This research aims to explore the role of Endostar in the occurrence of grade≥2 RP and clinical curative effect in LA-NSCLC patients.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 122 patients with stage III NSCLC who received CCRT from December 2008 to December 2017, or Endostar intravenous drip concurrently with chemoradiotherapy (Endostar + CCRT group). Standard toxicity of the pneumonitis endpoint was also collected by CTCAE V5.0. We further summarized other available studies on the role of Endostar in the prognosis of NSCLC patients and the incidence of RP.

RESULTS

There were 76 cases in the CCRT group and 46 cases in the CCRT+ Endostar group. In the CCRT+ Endostar group, the occurrence of grade ≥2 RP in patients with V20Gy ≥25% was significantly higher than that in patients with V20Gy < 25% (p = 0.001). In the cohorts with V20Gy < 25%, 0 cases of 29 patients treated with Endostar developed grade ≥2 RP was lower than in the CCRT group (p = 0.026). The re-analysis of data from other available studies indicated that Endostar plus CCRT could be more efficient and safely in the occurrence of grade≥2 RP with LA-NSCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

When receiving CCRT for LA-NSCLC patients, simultaneous combination of Endostar is recommended to enhance clinical benefit and reduce pulmonary toxicity.

First-line treatment with camrelizumab plus famitinib in advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥1%: results from a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

The combination of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents can synergistically modulate the tumor microenvironment and represents a promising treatment option. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus famitinib (a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) as a first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with a programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥1%, in an open-label, multicenter, phase 2 basket trial.

METHODS

Eligible patients received camrelizumab (200 mg once every 3 weeks via intravenous infusion) plus oral famitinib at an initial dose of 20 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), as assessed by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1. Key secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), duration of respons, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), 12-month OS rate, and safety profile.

RESULTS

Of the enrolled 41 patients, 21 (51.2%) had a PD-L1 TPS of 1-49%. As of the cut-off date on June 22, 2022, the combination regimen of camrelizumab and famitinib achieved an ORR of 53.7% (95% CI 37.4% to 69.3%) and a DCR of 92.7% (95% CI 80.1% to 98.5%). The median PFS was 16.6 months (95% CI 8.3 to not reached), and OS data were not yet mature, with an estimated 12-month OS rate of 76.8% (95% CI 60.0% to 87.3%). The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher included hypertension (22.0%), increased alanine aminotransferase (12.2%), decreased neutrophil count (9.8%), proteinuria (7.3%), decrease platelet count (7.3%), and hypokalemia (7.3%). One (2.4%) patient died from grade 5 hemoptysis, which was considered possibly related to the study treatment by the investigator.

CONCLUSION

Camrelizumab plus famitinib demonstrated promising antitumor activity in advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients and had an acceptable safety profile. These findings suggest that this combination regimen could be an alternative therapeutic option and warrant further investigation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04346381.

Immunotherapy and targeted therapy for cholangiocarcinoma: Artificial intelligence research in imaging

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly aggressive hepatobiliary malignancy, second only to hepatocellular carcinoma in prevalence. Despite surgical treatment being the recommended method to achieve a cure, it is not viable for patients with advanced CCA. Gene sequencing and artificial intelligence (AI) have recently opened up new possibilities in CCA diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis assessment. Basic research has furthered our understanding of the tumor-immunity microenvironment and revealed targeted molecular mechanisms, resulting in immunotherapy and targeted therapy being increasingly employed in the clinic. Yet, the application of these remedies in CCA is a challenging endeavor due to the varying pathological mechanisms of different CCA types and the lack of expressed immune proteins and molecular targets in some patients. AI in medical imaging has emerged as a powerful tool in this situation, as machine learning and deep learning are able to extract intricate data from CCA lesion images while assisting clinical decision making, and ultimately improving patient prognosis. This review summarized and discussed the current immunotherapy and targeted therapy related to CCA, and the research progress of AI in this field.

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for colorectal cancer: Clinical implications and future considerations

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer in the world. The PD-1/PD-L1 pathway plays a crucial role in modulating immune response to cancer, and PD-L1 expression has been observed in tumor and immune cells within the tumor microenvironment of CRC. Thus, immunotherapy drugs, specifically checkpoint inhibitors, have been developed to target the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway, thereby inhibiting the interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1 and restoring T-cell function in cancer cells. However, the emergence of resistance mechanisms can reduce the efficacy of these treatments. To counter this, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been used to improve the efficacy of CRC treatments. mAbs such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab are currently approved for CRC treatment. These antibodies impede immune checkpoint receptors, including PD-1/PD-L1, and their combination therapy shows promise in the treatment of advanced CRC. This review presents a concise overview of the use of the PD-1/PD-L1 blockade as a therapeutic strategy for CRC using monoclonal antibodies and combination therapies. Additionally, this article outlines the function of PD-1/PD-L1 as an immune response suppressor in the CRC microenvironment as well as the potential advantages of administering inflammatory agents for CRC treatment. Finally, this review analyzes the outcomes of clinical trials to examine the challenges of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapeutic resistance.

All-cause and immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute kidney injury in immune checkpoint inhibitor users: a meta-analysis of occurrence rate, risk factors and mortality

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the occurrence rate of ICI-related AKI has not been systematically examined. Additionally, exposure to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were considered as risk factors for AKI, but with inconclusive results in ICI-related AKI. Our aim was to analyse the occurrence rate of all-cause AKI and ICI-related AKI and the occurrence rates of severe AKI and dialysis-requiring AKI, and to determine whether exposure to PPIs and NSAIDs poses a risk for all-cause and ICI-related AKI.

Methods

This study population was adult ICI recipients. A systematic review was conducted by searching MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed through October 2023. We included prospective trials and observational studies that reported any of the following outcomes: the occurrence rate of all-cause or ICI-related AKI, the relationship between PPI or NSAID exposure and AKI development or the mortality rate in the AKI or non-AKI group. Proportional meta-analysis and pairwise meta-analysis were performed. The evidence certainty was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework.

Results

A total of 120 studies comprising 46 417 patients were included. The occurrence rates of all-cause AKI were 7.4% (14.6% from retrospective studies and 1.2% from prospective clinical trials). The occurrence rate of ICI-related AKI was 3.2%. The use of PPIs was associated with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.77 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-2.18] for all-cause AKI and an OR of 2.42 (95% CI 1.96-2.97) for ICI-related AKI. The use of NSAIDs was associated with an OR of 1.77 (95% CI 1.10-2.83) for all-cause AKI and an OR of 2.57 (95% CI 1.68-3.93) for ICI-related AKI.

Conclusions

Our analysis revealed that approximately 1 in 13 adult ICI recipients may experience all-cause AKI, while 1 in 33 adult ICI recipients may experience ICI-related AKI. Exposure to PPIs and NSAIDs was associated with an increased OR risk for AKI in the current meta-analysis.

Cabozantinib plus atezolizumab in previously untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and previously treated gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: results from two expansion cohorts of a multicentre, open-label, phase 1b trial (COSMIC-021)

Background

Cabozantinib is approved for previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) and has been investigated in gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJ). Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is approved for unresectable or metastatic HCC untreated with prior systemic therapy. We evaluated efficacy and safety of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab in aHCC previously untreated with systemic anticancer therapy or previously treated GC/GEJ.

Methods

COSMIC-021 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03170960) is an open-label, phase 1b study in solid tumours with a dose-escalation stage followed by tumour-specific expansion cohorts, including aHCC (cohort 14) and GC/GEJ (cohort 15). Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with measurable locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent disease per RECIST version 1.1. Patients received oral cabozantinib 40 mg daily and intravenous atezolizumab 1200 mg once every 3 weeks until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate per RECIST version 1.1.

Findings

Patients were screened between February 14, 2019, and May 7, 2020, and 61 (30 aHCC, 31 GC/GEJ) were enrolled and received at least one dose of study treatment. Median duration of follow-up was 31.2 months (IQR 28.5-32.7) for aHCC and 30.4 months (28.7-31.9) for GC/GEJ. Objective response rate was 13% (4/30, 95% CI 4-31) for aHCC and 0% (95% CI 0-11) for GC/GEJ. Six (20%) aHCC patients and three (10%) GC/GEJ patients had treatment-related adverse events resulting in discontinuation of either study drug.

Interpretation

Cabozantinib plus atezolizumab had clinical activity with a manageable safety profile in aHCC previously untreated with systemic anticancer therapy. Clinical activity of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab was minimal in previously treated GC/GEJ.

Funding

Exelixis, Inc., Alameda, CA, USA.

Overcoming Resistance Mechanisms to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Leveraging the Anti-Tumor Immune Response

As far back as 3000 years ago, the immune system was observed to play a role in mediating tumor regression. Since then, many strategies have been developed to leverage the anti-tumor immune response. However, while many patients respond to ICIs up front some do not, and many of those that do eventually experience tumor progression. Currently, there are several predictive biomarkers of the immune checkpoint inhibitor response; however, no one test appears to be universally predictive and their application varies by disease site. There are many ways in which cancer cells develop primary or acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Efforts to reverse resistance include ways to combat T cell exhaustion, reprogram the tumor microenvironment, increase the availability of tumor neo-antigens, target alternative immune checkpoints, restore a normal/healthy patient gut microbiome, oncolytic viruses and tumor vaccines. The most studied and most promising methods include combining ICIs with therapies targeting alternative immune checkpoints and restoring a normal/healthy patient gut microbiome. This review will discuss T cell-mediated immunity, how this is leveraged by modern immunotherapy to treat cancer and mechanisms of immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance, while highlighting strategies to overcome primary and secondary resistance mechanisms.

Optimizing the Continuum of Care in Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) still ranks as the fifth most common malignancy and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Despite the recent progress in the therapeutic algorithm of the advanced disease with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and next-generation HER2-directed therapies, survival rates remain poor, with a median survival hardly exceeding 12 months. Furthermore, only 40% of patients remain eligible for second- and later-line treatments due to the aggressiveness of the disease and the rapid deterioration of performance status (PS). Thus, current research is focusing either on the identification of novel treatment options or the development of personalized strategies to optimize the continuum of care and ultimately improve patients' outcome. In this article, we provide an overview of the current treatment landscape for advanced GC with a particular emphasis on later-line treatments and outline novel perspectives on the horizon.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and cellular immunotherapy for advanced gastric, gastroesophageal cancer: a long pathway

Although the incidence rate and mortality of gastric/gastroesophageal cancer (G/GEJC) are declining globally, G/GEJC remains a health issue in East Asia. When diagnosed as advanced stage, treatment after serial lines of chemotherapy is limited, with a median overall survival of less than 1 year. Immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and cellular immunotherapy, has changed the prospects of cancer therapy by reversing immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment. As part of this review, we enumerated the clinical uses of ICIs related to the immunosuppressive signaling axis PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4/B7. ICIs were initially approved as a secondary treatment option for patients with severe pretreating advanced gastric and gastroesophageal cancer (AG/GEJC). Till now, it has become the mainstream therapy in combination with chemotherapy and targeted therapy for patients identified by biomarkers. Numerous evidence showed microsatellite instability (MSI), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, tumor mutation burden (TMB) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status might be indicative to the use of ICIs. In addition, we discussed the current limitations and prospects of ICIs in AG/GGEJC, as well as the first clinical application of novel CAR-T cell therapies.

Vascular normalization: reshaping the tumor microenvironment and augmenting antitumor immunity for ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer remains a challenging disease with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a crucial role in tumor growth, progression, and therapy response. One characteristic feature of the TME is the abnormal tumor vasculature, which is associated with inadequate blood perfusion, hypoxia, and immune evasion. Vascular normalization, a therapeutic strategy aiming to rectify the abnormal tumor vasculature, has emerged as a promising approach to reshape the TME, enhance antitumor immunity, and synergize with immunotherapy in ovarian cancer. This review paper provides a comprehensive overview of vascular normalization and its potential implications in ovarian cancer. In this review, we summarize the intricate interplay between anti-angiogenesis and immune modulation, as well as ICI combined with anti-angiogenesis therapy in ovarian cancer. The compelling evidence discussed in this review contributes to the growing body of knowledge supporting the utilization of combination therapy as a promising treatment paradigm for ovarian cancer, paving the way for further clinical development and optimization of this therapeutic approach.

Unveiling the role of GAS41 in cancer progression

GAS41, a member of the human YEATS domain family, plays a pivotal role in human cancer development. It serves as a highly promising epigenetic reader, facilitating precise regulation of cell growth and development by recognizing essential histone modifications, including histone acetylation, benzoylation, succinylation, and crotonylation. Functional readouts of these histone modifications often coincide with cancer progression. In addition, GAS41 functions as a novel oncogene, participating in numerous signaling pathways. Here, we summarize the epigenetic functions of GAS41 and its role in the carcinoma progression. Moving forward, elucidating the downstream target oncogenes regulated by GAS41 and the developing small molecule inhibitors based on the distinctive YEATS recognition properties will be pivotal in advancing this research field.

Research advances in mechanism of antiangiogenic therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Immunotherapy has changed the treatment strategy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in recent years, among which anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies are the most used. However, the majority of patients with NSCLC do not derive benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Vascular abnormalities are a hallmark of most solid tumors and facilitate immune evasion. Thus, combining antiangiogenic therapies might increase the effectiveness of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. In this paper, the mechanisms of anti-angiogenic agents combined with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies are illustrated, moreover, relevant clinical studies and predictive immunotherapeutic biomarkers are summarized and analyzed, in order to provide more treatment options for NSCLC patients.

A randomized double-blind trial of TQB2450 with or without anlotinib in pretreated driver-negative non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Immune monotherapy as second-line treatment confers only modest survival benefit on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with no mutated driver genes, necessitating combination treatment strategies. This phase Ib trial investigated the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-L1 antibody TQB2450 plus antiangiogenic drug anlotinib for NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pretreated stage IIIB or IV NSCLC patients with wild-type EGFR/ALK and minimally one measurable lesion were randomized 1:1:1 to receive TQB2450 1200 mg plus placebo, or TQB2450 1200 mg plus anlotinib 10 or 12 mg. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients received TQB2450 plus placebo and 34 patients each received TQB2450 plus anlotinib 10 mg and 12 mg. At the data cutoff, the median PFS was 8.7 months (95% CI 6.1-17.1) in the TQB2450 plus anlotinib group and 2.8 months (95% CI 1.4-4.7) in the TQB2450 only group. The ORR reached 30.9% (95% CI 20.2%-43.3%) in the TQB2450 plus anlotinib group and was 3.0% (95% CI 0.1%-15.8%) in the TQB2450 only group. In patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1%, the ORR was 50.0% (95% CI 33.4%-66.6%) for TQB2450 plus anlotinib and 5.3% (95% CI 0.1%-26.0%) for TQB2450 plus placebo. No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib plus TQB2450 demonstrated promising antitumor activities in advanced NSCLC patients without EGFR and ALK alterations and the toxicities were overall manageable. The study findings support the continued development of TQB2450 plus anlotinib for advanced NSCLC patients without driver gene alterations.

Current status and future of anti-angiogenic drugs in lung cancer

Lung cancer, as a malignant tumor with both high incidence and mortality in China, is one of the major causes of death in our population and one of the major public health problems in China. Effective treatment of lung cancer is a major public health task for all human beings. Angiogenesis plays an important role in the development of tumor, not only as a basic condition for tumor growth, but also as a significant factor to promote tumor metastasis. Therefore, anti-angiogenesis has become a vital means to inhibit tumor development, and anti-angiogenic drugs can rebalance pro- and anti-angiogenic factors to inhibit tumor cells. This article reviews the mechanism of blood vessel formation in tumor tissues and the mechanism of action of different anti-angiogenic drugs, the combination therapy of anti-angiogenic drugs and other anti-tumor drugs, and the mechanism of anti-angiogenic drug resistance.

Treatment-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with angiogenesis inhibitors have been used to treat advanced lung cancer. Their associated treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) are currently considered acceptable; however, no conclusion has been reached. We aimed to summarize the trAEs caused by ICIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors in patients with advanced lung cancer.

METHODS

Pulled studies met the following criteria: patients with advanced lung cancer who received treatment involving ICIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors (with or without chemotherapy) in interventional or observational studies. Results included the type and number of trAEs or immune-related adverse events (irAEs), treatment-associated discontinuation and mortality, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

PROSPERO

CRD42022337656.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 32 trials involving 2313 patients who had 7768 any-grade trAEs and 1078 grade ≥3 trAEs. The pooled incidences were 87.33% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79.49-93.65; I2 = 94.04%) for any-grade trAEs, and 38.63% (95% CI: 28.28-49.50; I2 = 95.61%) for grade ≥3 trAEs. There were 132 kinds of any-grade trAEs involving 18 systems, and 99 kinds of grade ≥3 trAEs involving 16 systems. For all trAEs, we observed significant differences in the line of therapy, trial design, therapy combination, and types of angiogenesis inhibitors (all P < 0.05). The rate of trAEs increased with dosage and frequency of medication. Pooled incidences of discontinuation and mortality were 10.64% and 0.81%, respectively. Nearly 647 patients experienced irAEs, including 636 any-grade irAEs and 154 grade ≥3 irAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the incidence of trAEs caused by ICIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors is generally acceptable. These trAEs have a wide spectrum nearly covering the full range of adverse events. Grade ≥3 trAEs are more closely associated with angiogenesis inhibitors than any grade. However, treatment-associated mortality remains concerning.

Sintilimab plus anlotinib as second- or third-line therapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: A prospective, single-arm, phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and uncommon EGFR alterations typically have worse treatment outcomes than patients with classically EGFR-mutated NSCLC. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of PD-1 blockade with sintilimab plus anti-angiogenic treatment with anlotinib in patients with NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations after two previous treatments, including a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen and a targeted treatment (or chemotherapy only for patients harboring EGFR ex20ins), received sintilimab combined with anlotinib. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

At data cutoff (September 27, 2022), median follow-up was 22.3 months (range, 1.2-37.6). Among 21 enrolled patients, 12 had EGFR ex20ins and nine had other uncommon EGFR mutations such as L861Q, G719A, and G709X. Overall, eight patients (38.1%) achieved an objective response, and 18 (85.7%) achieved disease control. Median (95% CI) progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.0 (5.4-8.6) months, and median overall survival (OS) was 20.0 (15.6-24.4) months. The 12-month PFS rate (95% CI) was 22.2% (7.4-42.0), and the 12-month OS rate was 66.7% (42.5-82.5). Patients harboring EGFR ex20ins had similar ORR and PFS to those with other mutations. Six patients (28.6%) experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); hand-foot syndrome was the most common grade 3 TRAE (2 patients; 9.5%). No grade ≥4 TRAEs were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of sintilimab and anlotinib demonstrated durable efficacy and was generally well tolerated in patients with NSCLC and uncommon EGFR mutations who had received prior standard-of-care treatments. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04790409).

Advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy for esophageal cancer

ABSTRACT

Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most common aggressive malignant tumors in the digestive system with a severe epidemiological situation and poor prognosis. The early diagnostic rate of EC is low, and most EC patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Multiple multimodality treatments have gradually evolved into the main treatment for advanced EC, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. And the emergence of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has greatly improved the survival of EC patients. This review highlights the latest advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy for EC, discusses the efficacy and safety of relevant drugs, summarizes related important clinical trials, and tries to provide references for therapeutic strategy of EC.

The benefit and risk of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials

Background

Previous studies revealed that Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/Programmed cell death-Ligand protein 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents had extensive anti-tumor activities. However, almost all studies on the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer are non-randomized controlled trials with small sample sizes, which might lead to a lack of effective metrics to assess the effectiveness and safety of the therapeutic regimen. Here, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

A single-arm meta-analysis was performed, and published literature from PubMed, Web of Science and Embase databases as of January 13, 2023, was systematically retrieved. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool and methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) Methodological items to evaluate the quality of eligible clinical trials. Outcomes including overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were extracted for further analysis. The random effect model is used to calculate the pooled parameters.

Results

19 studies (16 were non-comparative single-arm clinical trials and 3 were randomized controlled trials) were enrolled in this meta-analysis. In terms of tumor response, the pooled ORR and DCR were 22.4% (95% CI, 16.6-28.1%) and 76.8% (95% CI, 72.6-81.1%), respectively. With regard to survival analysis, the pooled PFS and OS were 5.20 (95% CI, 4.46-5.93) months and 14.09 (95% CI, 13.20-14.97) months, respectively. The pooled grade ≥3 adverse effect (AE) rate was 47.6% (95% CI, 33.1-62.0%).

Conclusion

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents has promising efficacy and safety as second or later-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023407559.

Current immune therapeutic strategies in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

ABSTRACT

Immune escape mechanisms in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can disrupt every step of the anti-cancer immune response. In recent years, an increased understanding of the specific mechanisms fueling immune escape has allowed for the development of numerous immunotherapeutic treatments that have been introduced into the clinical practice. The advent of immunotherapy has dramatically changed the current treatment landscape of advanced or metastatic NSCLC because of its durable efficacy and manageable toxicity. In this review, we will first present a brief overview of recent evidence on immune escape mechanisms in NSCLC. We will then discuss the current promising immunotherapeutic strategies in advanced or metastatic NSCLC tumors.

AK112, a novel PD-1/VEGF bispecific antibody, in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): an open-label, multicenter, phase II trial

Background

Inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) function can improve the efficacy of immunotherapy by modulating the tumor immune microenvironment. AK112 is the first-in-class humanized IgG1 bispecific antibody targeting programmed death-1 (PD-1) and VEGF. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AK112 combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

This open-label, multicenter, phase II clinical trial was conducted in 11 hospitals in China. Eligible participants were adults aged 18-75 years with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, at least one measurable lesion, and an estimated life expectancy of at least 3 months. The participants were categorized into three cohorts based on prior therapy and functional genomic alterations. Patients in cohort 1 were previously untreated advanced NSCLC, had no epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene modifications, and received AK112 combined with pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) for non-squamous (non-sq)-NSCLC or paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) for sq-NSCLC plus carboplatin (area under the curve of 5 mg/mL per min) for four cycles, followed by AK112 with pemetrexed for non-sq-NSCLC and AK112 alone for sq-NSCLC as maintenance therapy. The participants in cohort 2 had advanced NSCLC with EGFR-sensitive mutations, failed previous EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy, and received pemetrexed plus AK112 and carboplatin for four cycles, followed by pemetrexed plus AK112 as maintenance therapy. The participants in cohort 3 had advanced NSCLC who failed systemic platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-PD-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) treatments and received AK112 plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2). Two dosages of AK112 (10 or 20 mg/kg) were examined in each cohort, and the drug was administered intravenously on day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. The primary endpoints were the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and safety. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04736823).

Findings

Eighty-three patients were enrolled from February 2021 to August 2022 and received the study treatment. Cohorts 1, 2, and 3 had 44, 19, and 20 patients, respectively. The confirmed ORR was 53.5% (23/43) [95% CI, 36.9-67.1], 68.4% (13/19) [95% CI, 43.4-87.4], and 40.0% (8/20) [95% CI, 19.1-63.9] in cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In cohort 1, the median PFS was not reached, and the 12-month PFS rate was 59.1%. In cohorts 2 and 3, the median PFS were 8.5 [95% CI, 5.5-NE] and 7.5 [95% CI, 2.3-NE] months, and the 12-month PFS rates were 35.5% and 44.5%, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were decreased white blood cell count [7 (8.4%)], neutropenia [5 (6.0%)], thrombocytopenia [2 (2.4%)], anemia [4 (4.8%)], and myelosuppression [2 (2.4%)].

Interpretation

AK112 plus platinum-doublet showed promising antitumor activity and safety not only in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC patients without driver mutation but also in patients with EGFR-functional mutation who failed previous EGFR-TKI therapy and advanced NSCLC patients who failed prior systemic platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatments, suggesting a valuable potential new treatment option for this patient population.

Funding

Akeso Biopharma, Inc., Zhongshan, China, and National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Immunotherapy through the Lens of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Immunotherapy has revolutionised anti-cancer treatment in solid organ malignancies. Specifically, the discovery of CTLA-4 followed by PD-1 in the early 2000s led to the practice-changing clinical development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Patients with lung cancer, including both small cell (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), benefit from the most commonly used form of immunotherapy in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), resulting in increased survival and quality of life. In NSCLC, the benefit of ICIs has now extended from advanced NSCLC to earlier stages of disease, resulting in durable benefits and the even the emergence of the word 'cure' in long term responders. However, not all patients respond to immunotherapy, and few patients achieve long-term survival. Patients may also develop immune-related toxicity, a small percentage of which is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. This review article highlights the various types of immunotherapeutic strategies, their modes of action, and the practice-changing clinical trials that have led to the widespread use of immunotherapy, with a focus on ICIs in NSCLC and the current challenges associated with advancing the field of immunotherapy.

Zinc Finger Proteins in the War on Gastric Cancer: Molecular Mechanism and Clinical Potential

According to the 2020 global cancer data released by the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) International, gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide, with yearly increasing incidence and the second-highest fatality rate in malignancies. Despite the contemporary ambiguous molecular mechanisms in GC pathogenesis, numerous in-depth studies have demonstrated that zinc finger proteins (ZFPs) are essential for the development and progression of GC. ZFPs are a class of transcription factors with finger-like domains that bind to Zn²⁺ extensively and participate in gene replication, cell differentiation and tumor development. In this review, we briefly outline the roles, molecular mechanisms and the latest advances in ZFPs in GC, including eight principal aspects, such as cell proliferation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), invasion and metastasis, inflammation and immune infiltration, apoptosis, cell cycle, DNA methylation, cancer stem cells (CSCs) and drug resistance. Intriguingly, the myeloid zinc finger 1 (MZF1) possesses reversely dual roles in GC by promoting tumor proliferation or impeding cancer progression via apoptosis. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the molecular mechanism of ZFPs on GC progression will pave the solid way for screening the potentially effective diagnostic indicators, prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets of GC.

Immunotherapy with or without targeted therapy for metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma: case report and literature review

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been proved having a better safety profile compared to platinum-based chemotherapy and have demonstrated encouraging anti-tumor therapeutic effects for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). However, few studies have evaluated the efficacy of ICIs in patients with metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (mUTUC).

Case reports

Case 1 was a 71-year-old male patient diagnosed with left renal pelvic carcinoma, accompanied by a metastasis to the second lumbar spine. As the patient became refractory to chemotherapy, four cycles of camrelizumab, one of the ICIs, were administered, which helped to control the metastases and extend the patient's progression-free survival to five months. Case 2 was an 88-year-old female with middle and lower right ureter carcinoma with right iliac arteriovenous invasion. The patient received five cycles of camrelizumab plus vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) inhibitors and achieved stable disease.

Conclusion

For patients who are ineligible for chemotherapy, immunotherapy might be a feasible treatment, regardless of whether or not they are given VEGFR2 inhibitors.

The Role of Angiogenesis Targeted Therapies in Metastatic Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Narrative Review

Since bevacizumab was first approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as an anti-angiogenic therapy in 2004, angiogenesis-targeted therapy has been developed for various types of solid tumors. To date, ramucirumab and apatinib are clinically available as treatments for metastatic advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Ramucirumab demonstrated prolonged survival as second-line therapy of metastatic AGC in the RAINBOW and REGARD trials. However, neither ramucirumab extended survival in treatment-naïve patients with AGC in the RAINFALL or RAINSTORM trials nor bevacizumab in the AVAGAST and AVATAR trials. Apatinib demonstrated superior efficacy over the best supportive care in a Chinese phase III trial but not in an international phase III (ANGEL) trial. Currently, combination therapy of ramucirumab with irinotecan or FTD/TPI is being evaluated in the third-line setting, assessing the efficacy of continuous angiogenesis inhibition from second- to third-line therapy. Recently, the role of angiogenesis inhibition via immunomodulators is attractive to clinicians. Emerging results of several early-phase clinical trials indicated the promising antitumor activity of angiogenesis inhibition in combination with immune therapy. This review offers an overview of the history of clinical trials focused on anti-angiogenic for patients with AGC and presents future perspectives in this area.

Anlotinib combined with Sintilimab is win-win cooperation for primary squamous cell carcinoma of the thyroid: A case report and literature review

Background

Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the thyroid (PSCCT) is a rare malignant tumor. The incidence rate of PSCCT is less than 1%. However, the diagnosis and treatment of PSCCT are limited. Surgical resection is considered to be one of the few effective intervention methods. In this article, we reported a case of taking tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for PSCCT.

Case summary

An 80-year-old male was admitted to our hospital with dyspnea, cough, wheezing, and hoarseness for a giant thyroid mass. He underwent bronchoscopy and tracheal stent implantation to alleviate the respiratory obstruction. Then he accepted right partial thyroid and right lymph node biopsy. Postoperative pathology revealed squamous cell carcinoma. Subsequently, he underwent an endoscopy to exclude upper gastrointestinal squamous cell carcinoma. Finally, he was diagnosed with PSCCT. The patient was tentatively treated with a combination of Anlotinib and Sintilimab. After two courses, the tumor volume significantly reduced in MRI images and shrank further after five courses of combined treatment. Unfortunately, the patient died of fulminant liver failure and autoimmune liver disease after 5-month-treatment.

Conclusion

TKIs combined with ICIs may be an effective and novel way for PSCCT treatment, but immune-related complications, especially liver damage, should be cared.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and combinations with other agents in cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma consists of a heterogeneous group of malignancies with generally poor prognoses. Immunotherapy has emerged in the treatment landscape of many tumors, offering survival benefits, but data regarding the use of immunotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma remain vague. In this review, the authors analyze differences in the tumor microenvironment and various immune escape mechanisms and discuss available immunotherapy combinations with other agents among completed and ongoing clinical trials, such as chemotherapy, targeted agents, antiangiogenic drugs, local ablative therapies, cancer vaccines, adoptive cell therapy and PARP and TGF-β inhibitors. Ongoing research to identify appropriate biomarkers is warranted.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as second-line and subsequent therapy in advanced small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Treatments for advanced small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients who are resistant to first-line chemotherapy are limited. Given that antiangiogenic agents and immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can confer synergistic therapeutic benefits, combination therapy should be considered. We explored the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with anlotinib and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors as second-line and subsequent therapy for advanced SCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed advanced SCLC patients at Shanghai Chest Hospital who had received anlotinib in combination with ICIs from November 2016 to November 2020 as second- and subsequent-line treatment. Patients with advanced SCLC who had received paclitaxel monotherapy as second-line treatment were included as the control group.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients were included in the final analysis (40 in the combination therapy group and 101 in the paclitaxel monotherapy group). The median progression-free survival (PFS) times for the combination therapy and paclitaxel monotherapy groups were 3.40 and 2.83 months (p = 0.022), respectively, while the median overall survival (OS) times for the combination therapy and paclitaxel monotherapy groups were 8.20 and 5.87 months (p = 0.048), respectively. Hypertension and hepatic dysfunction were the most pronounced adverse events of combination therapy and two patients changed regimens due to severe fatigue and anorexia.

CONCLUSION

The combination of anlotinib and PD-1/PD-L1 blockade has promising efficacy and safety as a second-line or subsequent therapy for SCLC.

Bioinformatic Analysis of PTTG Family and Prognosis and Immune Cell Infiltration in Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is the sixth highest incidence rate in the world. Although treatment has made progress, the prospect of gastric cancer patients is bleak. Difficulties and future prospects of immunotherapy in cancer treatment. Adaptive cell therapy, cancer vaccines, gene therapy, and monoclonal antibody therapy have all been used in gastric cancer with some initial success. PTTGs (pituitary tumor-transforming genes) have been proven to be closely related to the prognosis of many malignant tumors. However, the prognosis and immune cell infiltration of gastric adenocarcinoma (STAD) remain unclear. We retrieved multiple databases to understand the possible activity of PTTGs and their expression in gastric cancer, as well as their relationship with clinical data, overall survival rate, first progression, and survival rate after progression. PTTGs are overexpressed in STAD tumor tissues. Many clinical variables are closely related to PTTGs. In addition, PTTG was associated with overall survival independent of disease. In addition, the expression of PTTG1/2 was positively correlated with the molecular status of the immune checkpoint and negatively correlated with the infiltration of various immune cells. Data research shows that PTTG and STAD are closely related. This paved the way for future research, revealed the complex pathophysiology of gastric cancer, and introduced an effective new treatment.

Application of immune checkpoint inhibitors in immunotherapy for gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide. With the development of immunotherapy, especially the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the prognosis of advanced gastric cancer has improved. At present, ICIs combined with other therapies or dual ICI strategies in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer have shown clinical effectiveness and controllable safety. In addition, predictive biomarkers facilitate the precise selection of patients. Therefore, it is crucial to explore rational combinations and reliable predictive biomarkers for ICI therapy. This article reviews the recent advances in ICIs and relevant predictive biomarkers in the treatment of gastric cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with angiogenic inhibitors in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

To report the efficacy and safety data of immunotherapy plus angiogenic inhibitors treatment in lung adenocarcinoma patients.

METHODS

Eligible patients with pathological or cytological confirmed locally advanced or metastatic lung adenocarcinoma and treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) plus angiogenic inhibitors were enrolled. The primary endpoints were progressive free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 46 consecutive enrolled patients received ICI plus angiogenic inhibitor, and the median follow-up was 9.6 months (range 1.5-32.5). The ORR and DCR were 8.7% (n = 4) and 50% (n = 23), respectively. Median PFS and OS were 2.9 months (95% CI 2.1-3.7) and 12.3 months (95% CI 7.6-17.0), respectively. Patients at stage IVB had an inferior PFS than stage IIIC or IVA (2.8 months vs 4.4 months, P = 0.003). The median PFS of patients who were treated with ICI plus bevacizumab was shorter than ICI plus anlotinib or apatinib (1.2 months vs 3.3 months, P = 0.005). The occurrence of hypertension during the combination treatment has been related to a tendency for prolonged PFS (5.5 months vs 2.6 months; P = 0.05). The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) was 89.1% (n = 41), and grade 3-4 TRAE was occupied 21.4% (n = 10).

CONCLUSION

This study objectively demonstrated that the treatment of ICI and antiangiogenic agents in lung adenocarcinoma could be a promising alternative therapeutic regimen, and the toxic effects were manageable. Subgroup analysis revealed that small molecular angiogenic inhibitors plus ICI and low tumor burden during treatment were better prognostic factors.

Effectiveness and safety of anti-PD-1 monotherapy or combination therapy in Chinese advanced gastric cancer: A real-world study

Purpose

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers and one of the leading causes of cancer deaths worldwide, especially in eastern Asia and China. Anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors, Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab, have been approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC). Our study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of anti-PD-1-based treatment (monotherapy or combination therapy) in Chinese patients with advanced or metastatic GC/GEJCs in a real-world setting.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, and 54 patients from May 31, 2015, to May 31, 2021, were included in our analysis, including 19 patients treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy and 35 patients treated with anti-PD-1 combination therapy. Demographic and clinical information were evaluated. Clinical response, survival outcomes, and safety profile were measured and analyzed.

Results

Overall, the median overall survival (mOS) was 11.10 months (95% CI, 7.05-15.15), and the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 3.93 months (95% CI, 2.47-5.39). Of the patients, 16.7% achieved a clinical response, and 72.2% achieved disease control. Prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and increased clinical response were observed in the combination group compared with the monotherapy group, although statistical significance was not reached. In subgroups with live metastases or elevated baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) levels, combination therapy outperformed anti-PD-1 alone in survival outcomes. Patients treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy (n = 5, 26.3%) had fewer treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) than those in the combination group (n = 22, 62.9%). There were also fewer patients with TRAEs of grades 3-5 with monotherapy (n = 2, 10.5%) than with combination therapy (n = 7, 20.0%). Pneumonitis in three patients was the only potential immune-related adverse event reported.

Conclusions

Anti-PD-1-based monotherapy and combination therapy showed favorable survival outcomes and manageable safety profiles in advanced or metastatic GC/GEJCs. In clinical treatment, immunotherapy should be an indispensable choice in the treatment strategy for GC/GEJC. Patients with a heavy tumor burden and more metastatic sites might benefit more from combination therapy. Elderly patients and patients with more treatment lines or high Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scores might be more suitable for immune monotherapy, and some clinical benefits have been observed.

Immune-related gene signature associates with immune landscape and predicts prognosis accurately in patients with skin cutaneous melanoma

Skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) is the skin cancer that causes the highest number of deaths worldwide. There is growing evidence that the tumour immune microenvironment is associated with cancer prognosis, however, there is little research on the role of immune status in melanoma prognosis. In this study, data on patients with Skin cutaneous melanoma were downloaded from the GEO, TCGA, and GTEx databases. Genes associated with the immune pathway were screened from published papers and lncRNAs associated with them were identified. We performed immune microenvironment and functional enrichment analyses. The analysis was followed by applying univariate/multivariate Cox regression algorithms to finally identify three lncRNAs associated with the immune pathway for the construction of prognostic prediction models (CXCL10, RXRG, and SCG2). This stepwise downscaling method, which finally screens out prognostic factors and key genes and then uses them to build a risk model, has excellent predictive power. According to analyses of the model's reliability, it was able to differentiate the prognostic value and continued existence of Skin cutaneous melanoma patient populations more effectively. This study is an analysis of the immune pathway that leads lncRNAs in Skin cutaneous melanoma in an effort to open up new treatment avenues for Skin cutaneous melanoma.

Immunotherapy resistance in non-small-cell lung cancer: From mechanism to clinical strategies

The high primary resistance incidence and unavoidable secondary resistance are the major clinical obstacle to lasting long-term benefits in Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immunotherapy. The mechanisms of immunotherapy resistance in NSCLC are complex, mainly involving tumor cells and tumor microenvironment (TME) infiltrating immune cells, including TAMs, B cells, NK cells, and T cells. The selection of clinical strategies for NSCLC progression after immunotherapy resistance should depend on the progressive mode. The progression pattern of NSCLC patients after immunotherapy resistance can be divided into oligo-progression and systemic/multiple progression, which should be considered for further treatment selection. In the future, it needs to explore how to optimize the combined therapy and explore strategies to reprogram infiltrating immune cells under various genetic backgrounds of tumor cells and timely reshape TME during antitumor treatments.

Clinical Management of Gastric Cancer Treatment Regimens

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer-associated death in the world. Endoscopic resection can be the treatment in selected cases of very early gastric cancer. Surgery is recommended for tumors that do not meet the criteria for endoscopic resection or for tumors with lymph node invasion but without distant metastases. Gastrectomy should include D2 lymphadenectomy without splenectomy. Perioperative or adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival and is recommended in locally advanced gastric cancer (>T1 and/or with lymph nodes positive). In locally advanced cancer with microsatellite instability (MSI), immunotherapy should be considered. Advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer has a poor prognosis. The basis of the treatment is cytotoxic chemotherapy, with platinum and fluoropyrimidine doublet in the first line. Targeted therapies can be combined with chemotherapy. Trastuzumab (anti-HER2) is recommended in the first line in HER2-positive cancer. Ramucirumab (anti-VEGFR2) is recommended in the second line, in addition to paclitaxel chemotherapy. Zolbetuximab (anti-Claudine 18.2) should also be considered in the first line in Claudine 18.2-positive cancer. Immunotherapy can also be associated with chemotherapy in the first line of PD-L1-positive cancer. In HER2-positive and PD-L1-positive cancer, adjunction of trastuzumab and immunotherapy should be considered. In advanced and metastatic cancer with microsatellite instability (MSI), immunotherapy should be the first choice depending on its availability. Important progress has been made in recent years in the treatment of gastric cancer, especially due to a better understanding of molecular characteristics and heterogeneity of this disease. New targets and therapeutic approaches are being developed, which will very likely lead to changes in the management of gastric cancer.

Immunotherapy combined with rh-endostatin improved clinical outcomes over immunotherapy plus chemotherapy for second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC

Background

Despite the fact that numerous clinical and preclinical studies have demonstrated the synergistic effects of combining antiangiogenic or chemotherapy with immunotherapy, no data have been found to indicate that combination therapy is more effective and safer as second-line therapy.

Methods

We retrospectively compared the effectiveness and safety of ICIs plus rh-endostatin to ICIs plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The evaluation indicators of this study were progression-free survival (PFS), safety profile, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and 1-year overall survival (OS).

Results

The median PFS with immunotherapy plus rh-endostatin (IE) was 7.10 months (95% CI, 4.64 to 9.56) versus 5.13 months (95% CI, 4.29 to 5.97) with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (IC) (HR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.33 to 0.95). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 7.5% of the IE group versus 25.0% of the IC group. The ORR in the IE group was 35.0% versus 20.8% in the IC group (P = 0.137), and the DCR in the IE group was 92.5% versus 77.1% in the IC group (P = 0.049). The 1-year OS rate for the IE group was 69.4%, which was higher than the 61.4% of the IC group.

Conclusion

Our study showed that ICI therapy combined with endostatin therapy exhibits high efficacy and safety, suggesting that such a combination might be a viable treatment option for patients with pre-treated NSCLC in the future.

Surufatinib plus toripalimab in patients with advanced solid tumors: a single-arm, open-label, phase 1 trial

PURPOSE

This phase 1 trial evaluated the safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of surufatinib, a small molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with toripalimab, a programmed cell death protein-1 antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

This is an open-label, dose-escalation and expansion study in patients with solid tumors who had failed standard therapies or had no effective treatment. In the dose-escalation stage, patients were treated with surufatinib, at dose levels of 200, 250, or 300 mg once daily (QD) in combination with toripalimab 240 mg, every 3 weeks (Q3W), to estimate maximum tolerated dose. Additional patients were enrolled in the dose expansion stage to further assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics profile. Recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was determined based on the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy from dose-escalation and expansion stages.

RESULTS

From Feb 14, 2019 to Dec 20, 2020, 33 patients were screened, of which 30 patients were enrolled. One patient in the 300 mg cohort experienced dose limited toxicity, a grade 3 hyperthyroidism. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events of grade ≥ 3 were hypertension (20.0%), transaminases increased (13.3%), and blood bilirubin increased (13.3%). No treatment-related death or treatment discontinuation was identified. The RP2D was determined to be surufatinib 250 mg QD plus toripalimab 240 mg Q3W. Objective response rate was 24.1% (95% confidence interval 10.3‒43.5%) in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Surufatinib plus toripalimab was well tolerated, with no unexpected safety signals, and showed preliminary anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03879057; registration date: March 18, 2019.

Rh‐endostatin plus camrelizumab and chemotherapy in first‐line treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Clinical evidence of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with antiangiogenic drugs in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was limited. Recombinant human endostatin (rh-endostatin), an antiangiogenic drug, and camrelizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, have been approved for the treatment of advanced NSCLC in China. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of rh-endostatin plus camrelizumab and chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

Eligible patients were enrolled and received camrelizumab (200 mg, day 1) every 3 weeks and continuous intravenous infusion of rh-endostatin (70 mg/day, days 1-3) and cisplatin combined with pemetrexed (for adenocarcinoma) or paclitaxel (for NSCLC other than adenocarcinoma) every 3 weeks. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles.

RESULTS

Overall, 27 patients were included, and 25 patients were eligible for efficacy evaluation. For these 25 patients, ORR was 48.15% (13/27) and DCR was 85.19% (23/27). With a median follow-up of 10.37 months, the median PFS was 8.9 (95% CI: 4.23-13.57) months. Median OS was not reached. Overall, 96.3% of patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event, and grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 9 (33.3%) patients. No unexpected AEs were observed.

CONCLUSION

Rh-endostatin plus camrelizumab and chemotherapy showed favorable efficacy and safety profile in patients with advanced NSCLC, representing a promising treatment regimen for these patients.

Current and novel therapeutic strategies for optimizing immunotherapy outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

During the past decade, immunotherapy has dramatically improved the outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The development of specific antibodies against the programmed death (PD1) receptor and its ligand PD-L1 (programmed death ligand-1) has demonstrated substantial efficacy in advanced NSCLC either in the first or in the second line. However, the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as monotherapy did not reach all patients and long-term responders still represent a small subset of cases. Under these circumstances, different strategies have been and are being tested to optimize clinical outcomes. Here, we reviewed the current evidence and the more promising perspectives of ICI combination approaches, such as the addition of chemotherapy, antiangiogenic agents, other co-inhibitory or co-stimulatory checkpoints, and targeted therapies.

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents with or without chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world retrospective cohort study

Background

The aim of this study was to assessment the efficacy and safety of Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/Programmed cell death-Ligand protein 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents with or without chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

In this study, pre-treatment clinical and laboratory indicators from 73 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were retrieved for retrospective analysis. According to the therapy regimes they received, the patients were separated into groups, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy group (PC group), PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents' group (PA group), PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents plus chemotherapy group (PAC group). Cox's proportional hazards regression model and Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were used to assess the connection between treatment regimens and progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In addition, the association of treatment regimens with the risk of disease progression and death was evaluated by subgroup analysis.

Results

The average age of the enrolled patients was 58.2 ± 10.2 years and 75.3% were male. Multivariate analyses showed that patients in PA group (Disease progression: HR 0.4, P=0.005. Death: HR 0.4, P=0.024) and PAC group (Disease progression: HR 0.3, P=0.012. Death: HR 0.3, P=0.045) had a statistically significant lower hazard ratio (HR) for disease progression and death compared to patients in PC group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients in PA group (mPFS:7.5 vs.3.5, P=0.00052. mOS:33.1 vs.21.8, P=0.093) and PAC group (mPFS:5.1 vs.3.5, P=0.075. mOS:37.3 vs.21.8, P=0.14) had a longer PFS and OS compared to patients in PC group. In all the pre-defined subgroups, patients in PA and PAC groups showed a decreasing trend in the risk of disease progression and death in most subgroups. The patients in PA group (DCR:96.3% vs.58.3%, P=0.001) and PAC group (DCR:100% vs.58.3%, P=0.019) had a better disease control rate (DCR) than patients in PC group.

Conclusion

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents with or without chemotherapy were superior to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as second or later-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.