Ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, gastro-oesophageal cancer, or urothelial carcinomas (JVDF): a multicohort, non-randomised, open-label, phase 1a/b trial

Randomized Phase III Trial of Ramucirumab Beyond Progression Plus Irinotecan in Patients With Ramucirumab-Refractory Advanced Gastric Cancer: RINDBeRG Trial

PURPOSE

Continuous use of antiangiogenic agents has demonstrated survival benefits in various cancers. This trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus irinotecan with irinotecan monotherapy as a third- or later-line treatment for patients with advanced or recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal cancer (AGC) that has progressed on previous ramucirumab-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients age 20 years and older with AGC, who had experienced disease progression during ramucirumab-based chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive either ramucirumab plus irinotecan or irinotecan monotherapy. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) expecting a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.77 (a power of 80% and a significance level of one-sided 0.05). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

RESULTS

Between February 2017 and August 2022, 402 patients in Japan were randomly assigned to receive ramucirumab plus irinotecan (n = 202) or irinotecan monotherapy (n = 200). The median OS was 9.4 months in the combination arm and 8.5 months in the monotherapy arm, with an adjusted HR of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.12; P = .49). PFS was improved (median, 3.8 v 2.8 months; HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89]; P = .002), while the DCR was significantly better (64.4% v 52.1%; P = .03) with the combination therapy. The adverse events of the combination therapy were manageable.

CONCLUSION

Adding ramucirumab to irinotecan does not provide a significant advantage in OS over irinotecan alone in patients with AGC who have progressed during ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy.

Enhanced effect of radiofrequency ablation on HCC by siRNA-PD-L1-endostatin Co-expression plasmid delivered

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) poses a significant clinical challenge due to high mortality and limited treatment options. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is commonly used but can be limited by tumor recurrence. This study explores the potential of combining RFA with an attenuated Salmonella strain carrying siRNA-PD-L1 and endostatin to enhance HCC treatment. In this study, an H22 subcutaneous tumor mouse model was used, with animals divided into five groups for treatment with a blank control, a blank Salmonella plasmid, RFA alone, siRNA-PD-L1-endostatin, or a combination of RFA and siRNA-PD-L1-endostatin. The combination therapy significantly reduced tumor growth, angiogenesis, and PD-L1/VEGF expression in tumor tissues post-RFA. Additionally, it induced tumor cell apoptosis, inhibited proliferation and migration, and increased the infiltration of T lymphocytes, granzyme B+T cells, and CD86+macrophages within tumors. There was also a notable rise in T and NK cell populations in the spleen. In conclusion, combining RFA with siRNA-PD-L1-endostatin delivered by attenuated Salmonella synergistically enhances anti-tumor effects, boosts the anti-tumor immune response, and improves RFA efficacy for HCC.

Efficacy and safety of surufatinib plus toripalimab in treatment-naive, PD-L1-positive, advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and previously treated small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, multi-cohort phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Combining the programmed death-1 inhibitor toripalimab and the angio-immuno kinase inhibitor surufatinib showed preliminary antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors in a phase I study. Here, we report the efficacy and safety of this combination regimen in treatment-naive advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of 1% or greater (PD-L1-positive) and patients with previously treated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

This open-label, single-arm phase II study included patients with treatment-naive advanced or metastatic PD-L1-positive NSCLC or previously treated SCLC in China. Patients received surufatinib (250 mg orally, once daily) plus toripalimab (240 mg intravenously, once every 3 weeks). Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were treated (NSCLC cohort, n = 23; SCLC cohort, n = 20). ORRs (95% CIs) were 57.1% (34.0-78.2) in the NSCLC cohort and 15.8% (3.4-39.6) in the SCLC cohort. Median duration of response was not reached (NR) in both cohorts. Median PFS was 9.6 (5.5-NR) and 3.0 months (2.8-4.1), respectively, and median OS was 24.3 (10.8-NR) and 11.0 months (5.0-15.7), respectively. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 24 patients (55.8%) overall.

CONCLUSION

Surufatinib plus toripalimab showed encouraging antitumor activity and a tolerable safety profile in patients with treatment-naive advanced or metastatic PD-L1-positive NSCLC and previously treated SCLC.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Family and the Immune System: Activators or Inhibitors?

The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family includes key mediators of vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. VEGFs are secreted by various cells of epithelial and mesenchymal origin and by some immune cells in response to physiological and pathological stimuli. In addition, immune cells express VEGF receptors and/or co-receptors and can respond to VEGFs in an autocrine or paracrine manner. This immunological role of VEGFs has opened the possibility of using the VEGF inhibitors already developed to inhibit tumor angiogenesis also in combination approaches with different immunotherapies to enhance the action of effector T lymphocytes against tumor cells. This review pursues to examine the current understanding of the interplay between VEGFs and the immune system, while identifying key areas that require further evaluation.

Evaluation of Anti-Angiogenic Therapy Combined with Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy as a Strategy to Treat Locally Advanced and Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Immunotherapy has made recent improvements in disease-free survival (DFS) and/or overall survival (OS) in all stages of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we review the tumor microenvironment and its immunosuppressive effects and discuss how anti-angiogenic therapies may potentiate the anti-carcinogenic effects of immunotherapy. We also review all the past literature and discuss strategies of combining anti-angiogenic therapy and immunotherapy +/- chemotherapy and hypothesize how we can use this strategy for non-small-cell lung cancer in metastatic previously untreated/previously treated settings in previously treated EGFR-mutated NSCLC for the upfront treatment of brain metastases prior to radiation therapy and for the incorporation of this strategy into stage III unresectable disease. We assert the use of anti-angiogenic therapy and immunotherapy when combined appropriately with chemotherapy and radiotherapy has the potential to increase the long-term survivals in both the stage III and metastatic setting so that we can now consider more patients to experience curative treatment.

Efficacy, Safety, and Influence on the Tumor Microenvironment of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab plus Ramucirumab for PD-L1-Positive NSCLC: A Phase II Trial (EAST ENERGY)

PURPOSE

Angiogenesis inhibitors are known to modify tumor immunity. Combination of angiogenesis inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors has shown efficacy against many types of cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated the feasibility of neoadjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab and ramucirumab, a VEGFR-2 antagonist for patients with PD-L1-positive NSCLC, and its influence on the tumor microenvironment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with pathologically proven, PD-L1-positive, clinical stage IB to IIIA NSCLC were eligible. Patients received two cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg/body) and ramucirumab (10 mg/kg) every 3 weeks. Surgery was scheduled 4 to 8 weeks after the last dose. The primary endpoint was the major pathologic response rate by a blinded independent pathologic review. The sample size was 24 patients. Exploratory endpoints were evaluated to elucidate the effects of neoadjuvant therapy on the tumor microenvironment.

RESULTS

The 24 eligible patients were enrolled between July 2019 and April 2022. The major pathologic response rate was 50.0% (90% confidence interval, 31.9%-68.1%). Six patients showed pathologic complete response. Grade 3 adverse events (AE) occurred in nine patients (37.5%), including three immune-related AEs (acute tubulointerstitial nephritis in two cases and polymyalgia rheumatica in one case). There were no grade 4 or 5 AEs. The transcriptome and multiplex IHC results suggested that tumors with greater CD8+ T-cell infiltration and higher expression of effector molecules at the baseline could show better sensitivity to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This new neoadjuvant combination of pembrolizumab plus ramucirumab was feasible, and anti-VEGF agents may enhance the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Leveraging the synergy between anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat digestive system cancers

The response rates to immunotherapy vary widely depending on the type of cancer and the specific treatment used and can be disappointingly low for many solid tumors. Fortunately, due to their complementary mechanisms of action, immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy have synergistic effects in cancer treatment. By normalizing the tumor vasculature, anti-angiogenic therapy can improve blood flow and oxygenation to facilitate better immune cell infiltration into the tumor and enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy. It also reduces immunosuppressive factors and enhances immune activation, to create a more favorable environment for immune cells to attack the tumor. Their combination leverages the strengths of both therapies to enhance anti-tumor effects and improve patient outcomes. This review discusses the vasculature-immunity crosstalk in the tumor microenvironment and summarizes the latest advances in combining anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat digestive system tumors.

Antiangiogenic therapy combined with immune checkpoint blockade in urothelial cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Antiangiogenic therapy had been tested in urothelial cancer (UC) without reaching the clinic.

Objective

We provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of trials to assess efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) combined with antiangiogenic agents in UC.

Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched for trials with at least one arm of patients with UC treated with ICI plus antiangiogenics. Data were analyzed with the "meta" package from R using a one-staged frequentist meta-analysis.

Results

After screening 13,708 titles and abstracts, 9 studies were selected for analysis with 14 identified cohorts comprising 621 patients: 448 were ICI-naïve (ICI-N) and 173 were ICI-exposed (ICI-E). The estimated objective response rate (ORR) in all patients was 27% (21-35). In the ICI-N group, ORR was 34% (28-41). Conversely, the ICI-E group had a lower ORR of 16% (9-28). This difference was mainly driven by a higher partial response rate of 27% (23-31) in ICI-N group compared to 13% (8-20) in the ICI-E group. Disease control rate was 72% (66-77) ICI-N group vs. 71% (64-78) in ICI-E group. Median overall survival ranged from 6.4 to 24.9 months in the ICI-N group, and 8.2 to 10.4 months in ICI-E group. Median progression free survival ranged from 1.9 to 10.1 months and from 3 to 3.9 months in both groups, respectively.

Conclusion

ORR with ICI plus antiangiogenics was lower after prior ICI exposure, with substantial variability estimates among included trials, either due to differences among antiangiogenic agents used or trial-related factors. Future exploration of ICI combined with antiangiogenics in UC, especially in ICI-refractory setting, will benefit from better patient selection.

The Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A121/Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A165 Ratio as a Predictor of the Therapeutic Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is limited. Further, there is a need to discover biomarkers to predict therapeutic efficacy. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is strongly associated with intra-tumoral immunity; however, its utility as a marker remains unknown. Therefore, our objectives were to examine the isoforms of VEGF and determine whether VEGF levels predict ICI efficacy.

METHODS

Levels of VEGF isoforms VEGF-A121 and VEGF-A165 were measured in stored serum samples obtained from 30 patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer who received nivolumab monotherapy at Kagoshima University Hospital, and the association with prognosis and treatment efficacy was retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The serum levels of the total VEGF, VEGF-A121, and VEGF-A165 were not significantly associated with prognosis. However, the ratio of VEGF-A121/VEGF-A165 (VEGF-A121/165) exhibited a statistically significant (p = 0.0088) difference in progression-free survival (PFS) with the low-ratio group having a 67-day prolonged median PFS time. Under univariable analysis, only VEGF-A121/165 values exhibited reduced progression-free survival with statistical significance. When comparing treatment responses in the low (n = 15) and high (n = 15) serum VEGF-A-121/165 groups, RECIST evaluation was 3 to 0 for complete response (CR), 2 to 0 for partial response (PR), 3 to 2 for stable disease (SD), and 3 to 10 for progressive disease (PD). Patients with clinically unsettled PR or SD were classified as non-CR/non-PD (4 vs. 3), with a disease control rate of 80% vs. 33%.

CONCLUSIONS

The serum VEGF-A121/165 ratio may represent a new, easily measured biomarker for predicting the therapeutic response to ICIs.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CAP 02 Re-challenge): A single-arm, phase II study

BACKGROUND

With the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), there remains an unmet need for options to address disease progression after prior ICIs. This single-arm phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of re-challenge with camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with advanced ESCC who were previously treated with ICIs.

METHODS

This study enrolled patients aged 18-75 years with unresectable locally advanced, locally recurrent, or distant metastatic ESCC who received prior ICIs. Patients received intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg every 2 weeks and oral apatinib 250 mg daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Between September 1, 2021 and March 29, 2023, 49 eligible patients were enrolled and received treatment. Among the 49 patients, the confirmed ORR was 10.2 % (95 % CI 3.4-22.2), the disease control rate (DCR) was 69.4 % (54.6-81.7), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.6 months (95 % CI 3.8-6.5) and overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months (5.5-13.6). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 17 patients (34.7 %). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the confirmed ORR was modest and did not reach clinically meaningful improvement for patients with ESCC who were previously treated with ICIs, with a manageable safety profile.

Prognostic and predictive factors in advanced upper gastrointestinal cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current evidence

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown encouraging treatment efficacy for upper gastrointestinal cancers (UGICs). However, durable clinical responses only existed in a minority of patients. We evaluated evidence predicting survival benefits to identify the optimal population followed by ICI-based therapy.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify clinical trials for UGICs with ICI-based therapy. The outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation System (GRADE).

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies comprising 12,440 patients were included for quantitative synthesis. Patients with PD-L1-positive (OR = 2.08, p < 0.00001), EBV+ (OR = 8.47, p = 0.003) tumors were more likely to respond to ICI treatment. Moreover, OS was significantly improved with the statistical subgroup difference concerning sex (p = 0.02) and region (p = 0.02). An exploratory subgroup analysis showed significantly improved OS with ICI plus chemotherapy in patients with CPS ≥ 10 (HR = 0.66, p = 0.001) and CPS ≥ 1 (HR = 0.75, p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

UGIC patients with PD-L1-positive, EBV + status are associated with a better therapeutic response to ICI-based therapy. The male patients and Asian patients could derive more survival benefits following ICI treatment than female and non-Asian ones. A combination of prognostic and predictive factors was suggested to help guide immunotherapy decision-making in UGIC patients.

The current status of immunotherapy and future horizon in the treatment of metastatic and locally advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Immunochemotherapy with PD-1 blockade has been established as the current standard first-line therapy for patients with mGEA. Reviewing the history of clinical trials offers valuable insight into the evolution of immune oncology in mGEA, paving the way for future advancements in this field.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the findings of previous clinical trials related to immunotherapy for patients with GEA in the metastatic and locally advanced setting. We also introduce ongoing clinical trials to address the current challenging issues in clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

In general, GEA exhibits intermediate immunogenic characteristics with heterogeneous expressions, and responders to anti-PD-(L)1 therapy are mostly enriched to patients with specific genomic profiles such as MSI-H, high PD-L1 expression, high TMB, and EBV-associated type. Co-administration with anti-angiogenic agents or simultaneous blockade of immune checkpoint molecules is being explored to offer benefit of immunotherapy for more patients. We hope that CLDN18.2 and upcoming targets like FGFR2b will complement the treatment niche of immunotherapy in the field of mGEA. Bispecific antibodies, antibody drug conjugates, CAR-T, and vaccine are anticipated to enhance efficacy and expand the scope of immunotherapy.

Mechanism insights and therapeutic intervention of tumor metastasis: latest developments and perspectives

Metastasis remains a pivotal characteristic of cancer and is the primary contributor to cancer-associated mortality. Despite its significance, the mechanisms governing metastasis are not fully elucidated. Contemporary findings in the domain of cancer biology have shed light on the molecular aspects of this intricate process. Tumor cells undergoing invasion engage with other cellular entities and proteins en route to their destination. Insights into these engagements have enhanced our comprehension of the principles directing the movement and adaptability of metastatic cells. The tumor microenvironment plays a pivotal role in facilitating the invasion and proliferation of cancer cells by enabling tumor cells to navigate through stromal barriers. Such attributes are influenced by genetic and epigenetic changes occurring in the tumor cells and their surrounding milieu. A profound understanding of the metastatic process's biological mechanisms is indispensable for devising efficacious therapeutic strategies. This review delves into recent developments concerning metastasis-associated genes, important signaling pathways, tumor microenvironment, metabolic processes, peripheral immunity, and mechanical forces and cancer metastasis. In addition, we combine recent advances with a particular emphasis on the prospect of developing effective interventions including the most popular cancer immunotherapies and nanotechnology to combat metastasis. We have also identified the limitations of current research on tumor metastasis, encompassing drug resistance, restricted animal models, inadequate biomarkers and early detection methods, as well as heterogeneity among others. It is anticipated that this comprehensive review will significantly contribute to the advancement of cancer metastasis research.

Ramucirumab in combination with pembrolizumab for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a single-centre, phase 1/2 trial

BACKGROUND

VEGF, a key mediator of angiogenesis and resistance to immunotherapy, is overexpressed in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We aimed to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of ramucirumab, a selective VEGFR2 inhibitor, given with pembrolizumab and the objective response rate of this combination as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC.

METHODS

In this single-centre, phase 1/2 trial, which was done at Washington University (St Louis, MO, USA), eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with incurable recurrent or metastatic HNSCC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Patients in phase 2 were required to have had no previous systemic therapy for recurrent or metastatic disease. In a dose de-escalation phase 1 design, patients received ramucirumab (starting dose 10 mg/kg given intravenously) and pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously) on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The recommended phase 2 dose of ramucirumab was defined as the highest dose at which one or fewer of three patients had dose-limiting toxicity during cycle one (primary endpoint of phase 1). In a Simon's two-stage phase 2 design, patients received the recommended phase 2 dose of ramucirumab and pembrolizumab. Tumour response (primary endpoint of phase 2) was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (version 1.1). We hypothesised that there would be an objective response rate of 32% or higher (null ≤13%). Eight or more responses among 33 evaluable patients (those with at least one response assessment) was evidence for activity (80% power; one-sided α=0·05). Analyses were done per protocol. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03650764, and is closed to enrolment.

FINDINGS

Between June 18, 2019, and Feb 11, 2021, three patients enrolled and were treated in phase 1 and 37 patients in phase 2. Median age of all patients was 64 years (IQR 59-72). 36 (90%) of 40 patients were men and four (10%) were women, and 36 (90%) patients were White, three (8%) were Black or African American, and one (3%) was Asian. In phase 1, no dose-limiting toxicity event occurred. The recommended phase 2 dose of ramucirumab was 10 mg/kg. Median follow-up for patients on phase 2 was 14·8 months (IQR 4·9-31·0). In phase 2, 18 (55%; 95% CI 38-70) of 33 evaluable patients had an objective response, including confirmed complete response in 11 patients, confirmed partial response in six patients, and unconfirmed partial response in one patient. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were dysphagia (14 [38%] of 37 patients), lung infection (11 [30%]), lymphocyte count decrease (ten [27%]), hypophosphataemia (nine [24%]), and hypertension (eight [22%]). No treatment-related deaths were recorded.

INTERPRETATION

Ramucirumab and pembrolizumab were safe to administer to patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC, and the objective response rate with this combination as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC was favourable. Further studies of ramucirumab and pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC are warranted.

FUNDING

Lilly and the Joseph Sanchez Foundation.

Landscape of targeted therapies for advanced urothelial carcinoma

Bladder cancer (BC) is the tenth most common malignancy globally. Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a major type of BC, and advanced UC (aUC) is associated with poor clinical outcomes and limited survival rates. Current options for aUC treatment mainly include chemotherapy and immunotherapy. These options have moderate efficacy and modest impact on overall survival and thus highlight the need for novel therapeutic approaches. aUC patients harbor a high tumor mutation burden and abundant molecular alterations, which are the basis for targeted therapies. Erdafitinib is currently the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved targeted therapy for aUC. Many potential targeted therapeutics aiming at other molecular alterations are under investigation. This review summarizes the current understanding of molecular alterations associated with aUC targeted therapy. It also comprehensively discusses the related interventions for treatment in clinical research and the potential of using novel targeted drugs in combination therapy.

Efficacy of ramucirumab combination chemotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction after exposure to checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy as first-line therapy

FOLFOX plus nivolumab represents a standard of care for first-line therapy of advanced gastroesophageal cancer (aGEC) with positive PD-L1 expression. The efficacy of second-line VEGFR-2 inhibition with ramucirumab (RAM) plus chemotherapy after progression to immunochemotherapy remains unclear. Medical records of patients with aGEC enrolled in the randomized phase II AIO-STO-0417 trial after treatment failure to first-line FOLFOX plus nivolumab and ipilimumab were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on second-line therapy: RAM plus chemotherapy (RAM group) or treatment without RAM (control group). Eighty three patients were included. In the overall population, progression-free survival (PFS) in the RAM group was superior to the control (4.5 vs 2.9 months). Responders (CR/PR) to first-line immunochemotherapy receiving RAM containing second-line therapy had prolonged OS from start of first-line therapy (28.9 vs 16.5 months), as well as second-line OS (9.6 vs 7.5 months), PFS (5.6 vs 2.9 months) and DCR (53% vs 29%) compared to the control. PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was 42% and 44% for the RAM and the control, respectively. Patients with CPS ≥1 in the RAM group showed better tumor control (ORR 25% vs 10%) and improved survival (total OS 11.5 vs 8.0 months; second-line OS 6.5 vs 3.9 months; PFS 4.5 vs 1.6 months) compared to the control. Prior exposure to first-line FOLFOX plus dual checkpoint inhibition followed by RAM plus chemotherapy shows favorable response and survival rates especially in patients with initial response and positive PD-L1 expression and has the potential to advance the treatment paradigm in aGEC.

Immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy as third- or further-line therapy for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer patients with ECOG performance status 2: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 2 probably cannot tolerate chemotherapy or other antitumor therapies. Some studies have reported that immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy is well-tolerated and shows good antitumor activity. However, the efficacy of this combination as a later-line therapy in patients with ECOG PS 2 is unclear. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of this combination strategy as third- or further-line therapy in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with ECOG PS 2.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients treated with camrelizumab plus antiangiogenic therapy (bevacizumab, anlotinib, or recombinant human endostatin) were included. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), quality of life (QOL) assessed by ECOG PS, and safety were analyzed.

RESULTS

Between January 10, 2019, and February 28, 2024, a total of 59 patients were included. The ORR was 35.6% (21/59) and the DCR was 86.4%. With a median follow-up of 10.5 months (range: 0.7-23.7), the median PFS was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8-7.3) and the median OS was 10.5 months (95% CI: 11.2-13.6). QOL was improved (≥1 reduction in ECOG PS) in 39 patients (66.1%). The most common Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were hepatic dysfunction (6 [10%]), hypertension (5 [8%]), and hypothyroidism (3 [5%]). There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Third- or further-line immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy is well-tolerated and shows good antitumor activity in stage IV NSCLC patients with ECOG PS 2. Future large-scale prospective studies are required to confirm the clinical benefits of this combination therapy.

Plasma sPD-L1 and VEGF levels are associated with the prognosis of NSCLC patients treated with combination immunotherapy

The clinical significance of plasma soluble programmed cell death ligand 1 (sPD-L1) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with the combination of anti-angiogenic therapy and anti-PD-L1 antibody (Ab) remain unknown. This study aimed to explore the association between plasma sPD-L1 and VEGF levels and the prognosis of NSCLC patients treated with the combination of Envafolimab and Endostar. Peripheral blood samples were collected from 24 NSCLC patients at baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment and were detected for sPD-L1 and VEGF levels. Both baseline and posttreatment sPD-L1 were significantly higher in progressive disease (PD) group than in controlled disease (CD) group (median: 77.5 pg/ml vs. 64.6 pg/ml, P  = 0.036, median: 8451 pg/ml vs. 5563 pg/ml, P  = 0.012). In multivariate analysis, lower baseline sPD-L1 levels were significantly associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 6.834, 95% CI: 1.350-34.592, P  = 0.020). There were significantly higher posttreatment VEGF levels in PD group compared with CD group (median: 323.7 pg/ml vs. 178.5 pg/ml, P  = 0.009). Higher posttreatment VEGF levels were significantly associated with shorter PFS in multivariate analysis (HR = 5.911, 95% CI: 1.391-25.122, P  = 0.016). Plasma sPD-L1 and VEGF levels are associated with the clinical response and prognosis of NSCLC patients treated with the combination of PD-L1 inhibitors and anti-angiogenetic therapy.

The role of PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway in cancer pathogenesis and treatment: a systematic review

Aim: Cancer as a complex disease poses significant challenges for both diagnosis and treatment. Researchers have been exploring various avenues to find effective therapeutic strategies, with a particular emphasis on cellular signaling pathways and immunotherapy. One such pathway that has recently been suggested is the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, which is an immune checkpoint signaling system that plays an important role in regulating the immune system and maintaining tissue homeostasis. Cancer cells exploit this pathway by producing PD-L1, which attaches to PD-1 on T cells, thus inhibiting immune responses and enabling the cancer cells to escape detection by the immune system. This study aimed to evaluate the role of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in cancer pathogenesis and treatment. Method: This study was performed based on the principles of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). All in vitro , in vivo , and clinical studies that were published in English have been considered during a thorough search of the Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases without date restriction until March 2024. Results: According to the studies reviewed, the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling axis suggests promising therapeutic effects on various types of cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, breast cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and colorectal cancer, among others. Additionally, research suggests that immune checkpoint inhibitors that block PD1/PD-L1, such as pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, nivolumab, durvalumab, cemiplimab, avelumab, etc. , can effectively prevent tumor cells from escaping the immune system. Moreover, there might be a possible interaction between microbiome, obesity, etc. on immune mechanisms and on the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Conclusion: Although we have gained considerable knowledge about ICIs, we are still facing challenges in effectively prescribing the appropriate ICIs for individual patients. This is largely due to the complex interactions between different intracellular pathways, which need to be thoroughly studied. To resolve this issue, it is necessary to conduct more reliable clinical trials that can produce a scientific consensus.

Immunotherapy combined with apatinib in the treatment of advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy or apatinib alone has been used as third-line adjuvant therapy for advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) tumors, but the efficacy of combining them with each other for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ is unknown; therefore, we further evaluated the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy combined with apatinib in patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ.

METHODS

The main search was conducted on published databases: Embase, Cochrane library, PubMed.The search was conducted from the establishment of the database to December 2023.Clinical trials with patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ and immunotherapy combined with apatinib as the study variable were collected. Review Manager 5.4 software as well as stata 15.0 software were used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 651 patients from 19 articles were included in this meta-analysis. In the included studies, immunotherapy combined with apatinib had a complete response (CR) of 0.03 (95% CI: 0.00 -0.06), partial response (PR) of 0.34 (95% CI: 0.19-0.49), stable disease (SD) of 0.43 (95% CI: 0.32-0.55), objective response rate (ORR) was 0.36 (95% CI: 0.23-0.48), disease control rate (DCR) was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.86), and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.29 (95% CI: 4.05-4.52), median Overall survival (OS) was 8.79 (95% CI: 7.92-9.66), and the incidence of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs was 0.34 (95% CI: 0:19-0.49). PR, ORR, DCR, median PFS and median OS were significantly higher in the immunotherapy and apatinib combination chemotherapy group (IAC) than in the immunotherapy combination apatinib group (IA). And the difference was not significant in the incidence of SD and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis shows that immunotherapy combined with apatinib is safe and effective in the treatment of advanced or metastatic G/GEJ, where IAC can be a recommended adjuvant treatment option for patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ. However, more large multicenter randomized studies are urgently needed to reveal the long-term outcomes of immunotherapy combined with apatinib treatment.

Efficacy and safety of novel immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have an exceptionally poor prognosis and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with etoposide-platinum is recommended as standard first-line therapy. However, which combination pattern is the best still remains unknown. This network meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of currently available patterns including an antiangiogenic agent containing regimen and probed into the most appropriate therapy for patients.

METHODS

Hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) were generated using R software. The outcomes of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events of grade 3 or higher (grade ≥ 3 adverse events [AEs]) were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 5544 patients were included for analysis. Drug combination patterns included adebrelimab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, serplulimab, benmelstobart plus anlotinib, tislelizumab, tiragolumab plus atezolizumab and toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy. The novel antiangiogenic agent containing regimen benmelstobart + anlotinib + chemotherapy showed the highest possibility to present the best PFS and OS versus chemotherapy. Compared with ICI plus chemotherapy, it also achieved significantly better PFS and presented a tendency of OS benefit. As for safety and toxicity, patients treated with benmelstobart + anlotinib + chemotherapy and durvalumab + tremelimumab + chemotherapy suffered a higher likelihood of more grade ≥ 3 AEs without unexpected AEs.

CONCLUSION

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors-based combinations are associated with significant improvement in both PFS and OS for treatment-naïve ES-SCLC patients. Benmelstobart plus anlotinib with chemotherapy (CT) yielded better survival benefit versus CT alone or other ICIs + CT with caution for more adverse effects along with the addition of an antiangiogenic agent.

Gastric Cancer, Immunotherapy, and Nutrition: The Role of Microbiota

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of gastric cancer (GC), which still represents the third leading cause of cancer-related death in Western countries. However, ICI treatment outcomes vary between individuals and need to be optimized. Recent studies have shown that gut microbiota could represent a key influencer of immunotherapy responses. At the same time, the nutritional status and diet of GC patients are also predictive of immunotherapy treatment response and survival outcomes. The objective of this narrative review is to gather recent findings about the complex relationships between the oral, gastric, and gut bacterial communities, dietary factors/nutritional parameters, and immunotherapy responses. Perigastric/gut microbiota compositions/functions and their metabolites could be predictive of response to immunotherapy in GC patients and even overall survival. At the same time, the strong influence of diet on the composition of the microbiota could have consequences on immunotherapy responses through the impact of muscle mass in GC patients during immunotherapy. Future studies are needed to define more precisely the dietary factors, such as adequate daily intake of prebiotics, that could counteract the dysbiosis of the GC microbiota and the impaired nutritional status, improving the clinical outcomes of GC patients during immunotherapy.

Current and Future Therapeutic Targets for Directed Molecular Therapies in Cholangiocarcinoma

We conducted a comprehensive review of the current literature of published data, clinical trials (MEDLINE; ncbi.pubmed.com), congress contributions (asco.org; esmo.org), and active recruiting clinical trains (clinicaltrial.gov) on targeted therapies in cholangiocarcinoma. Palliative treatment regimens were analyzed as well as preoperative and perioperative treatment options. We summarized the current knowledge for each mutation and molecular pathway that is or has been under clinical evaluation and discussed the results on the background of current treatment guidelines. We established and recommended targeted treatment options that already exist for second-line settings, including IDH-, BRAF-, and NTRK-mutated tumors, as well as for FGFR2 fusion, HER2/neu-overexpression, and microsatellite instable tumors. Other options for targeted treatment include EGFR- or VEGF-dependent pathways, which are known to be overexpressed or dysregulated in this cancer type and are currently under clinical investigation. Targeted therapy in CCA is a hallmark of individualized medicine as these therapies aim to specifically block pathways that promote cancer cell growth and survival, leading to tumor shrinkage and improved patient outcomes based on the molecular profile of the tumor.

Gene features of tumor-specific T cells relevant to immunotherapy, targeted therapy and chemotherapy in lung cancer

1 BACKGROUND

In lung cancer, the use of small-molecule inhibitors, chemotherapy and immunotherapy has led to unprecedented survival benefits in selected patients. Considering most patients will experience a relapse within a short period of time due to single drug resistance, combination therapy is also particularly important to improve patient prognosis. Therefore, more robust biomarkers to predict responses to immunotherapy, targeted therapy, chemotherapy and rationally drug combination therapies may be helpful in clinical treatment choices.

2 METHODS

We defined tumor-specific T cells (TSTs) and their features (TSTGs) by single-cell RNA sequencing. We applied LASSO regression to filter out the most survival-relevant TSTGs to form the Tumor-specific T cell score (TSTS). Immunological characteristics, enriched pathways, and mutation were evaluated in high- and low TSTS groups.

3 RESULTS

We identified six clusters of T cells as TSTs in lung cancer, and four most robust genes from 9 feature genes expressed only on tumor-specific T cells were screened to construct a tumor-specific T cells score (TSTS). TSTS was positively correlated with immune infiltration and angiogenesis and negatively correlated with malignant cell proliferation. Moreover, potential vascular-immune crosstalk in lung cancer provides the theoretical basis for combined anti-angiogenic and immunotherapy. Noticeable, patients in high TSTS had better response to ICB and targeted therapy and patients in the low TSTS group often benefit from chemotherapy.

4 CONCLUSION

The proposed TSTS is a promising indicator to predict immunotherapy, targeted therapy and chemotherapy responses in lung cancer patients for helping clinical treatment choices.

Incidence of thromboembolic events in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

The incidence of thromboembolic events (TEs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has rarely been reported. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched. The primary outcome was the incidence of TEs, and the secondary outcome was the relationship between TEs and overall survival (OS) following ICI therapy. A subgroup analysis of TE incidents was performed according to the TE type and combination regimens. The I2 statistic was used to determine the heterogeneity, and funnel plots and Egger's test were used to assess publication bias. A total of 16,602 patients with NSCLC in 63 experimental arms were included in the analysis. The rate of TEs ranged from 0.1% to 13.8%, and the pooled overall incidence of all-grade TEs was 3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2%-4%). The pooled rate of high-grade TEs was 1% (95% CI, 1%-2%). The venous and arterial TE rates were 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%) and 1% (95% CI, 1%-2%), respectively. Patients who received immunotherapy + chemoradiotherapy had the highest incidence of TEs (7%). The TE pooled rate was higher in patients treated with combined ICIs than in those treated with mono ICIs (4% vs. 2%). The OS was lower in patients with TEs than in those without TEs (hazard ratio, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.02%-1.92%). The incidence of TEs in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs was reasonable. Nonetheless, clinicians must be aware of potential thrombotic complications and treat them promptly.

Clinical immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer remains a challenging disease with limited treatment options, resulting in high mortality rates. The predominant approach to managing pancreatic cancer patients continues to be systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy. Despite substantial advancements in immunotherapy strategies for various cancers, their clinical utility in pancreatic cancer has proven less effective and durable. Whether administered as monotherapy, employing immune checkpoint inhibitors, tumor vaccines, chimeric antigen receptors T cells, or in combination with conventional chemoradiotherapy, the clinical outcomes remain underwhelming. Extensive preclinical experiments and clinical trials in the realm of pancreatic cancer have provided valuable insights into the complexities of immunotherapy. Chief among the hurdles are the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, limited immunogenicity, and the inherent heterogeneity of pancreatic cancer. In this comprehensive review, we provide an overview and critical analysis of current clinical immunotherapy strategies for pancreatic cancer, emphasizing their endeavors to overcome immunotherapy resistance. Particular focus is placed on strategies aimed at reshaping the immunosuppressive microenvironment and enhancing T cell-mediated tumor cell killing. Ultimately, through deeper elucidation of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of pancreatic cancer and the refinement of therapeutic approaches, we anticipate breakthroughs that will pave the way for more effective treatments in this challenging disease.

Efficacy of ramucirumab and subsequent nivolumab therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective study

Nivolumab monotherapy is a standard treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, and this type of cancer involves vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling in the tumor immunological environment. The subgroup analysis of the ATTRACTION-2 trial revealed that prior treatment with ramucirumab (RAM), a VEGF inhibitor, affected the therapeutic effect of nivolumab. The present retrospective study aimed to review patients with metastatic gastric cancer who were treated with paclitaxel (PTX) and RAM followed by nivolumab. A total of 29 patients with metastatic gastric cancer were treated with PTX + RAM as second-line treatment, followed by nivolumab monotherapy as third-line treatment. The therapeutic efficacy of nivolumab was compared in 13 patients with progression-free survival (PFS) of <5 months and 16 patients with PFS ≥5 months after PTX + RAM therapy. The present study included 22 male and seven female patients, with a median age of 68 years (range, 45-82 years). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positivity was observed in six patients. The disease control rate was 62.1%. The PFS and overall survival (OS) were 4.4 and 11.9 months, respectively. Patients with PFS ≥5 months after PTX + RAM therapy showed better outcome in both PFS (5.3 months vs. 2.8 months, P=0.039) and OS (6.9 months vs. 15.2 months, P=0.066) after nivolumab treatment than patients with PFS of <5 months after PTX + RAM therapy. However, no significant relationship was observed between the outcome of first-line treatment and nivolumab. The therapeutic effect of nivolumab was associated with prior PTX + RAM treatment in advanced gastric cancer.

A Phase 1b Study of Ivonescimab, a Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Bispecific Antibody, as First- or Second-Line Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Immunotherapy-Naive NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

This study (HARMONi-5) aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ivonescimab (a bispecific antibody against programmed cell death protein 1 and vascular endothelial growth factor) as first- or second-line monotherapy in patients with advanced immunotherapy-naive NSCLC.

METHODS

Eligible patients received intravenous ivonescimab 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks (Q3W), 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W), 20 mg/kg Q3W, or 30 mg/kg Q3W. The primary end points were safety and objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.

RESULTS

At data cutoff (October 5, 2022), 108 patients were enrolled and received ivonescimab. Programmed death ligand-1 tumor proportion score (TPS) was greater than or equal to 1% in 74 patients (68.5%), including 35 (32.4%) with TPS greater than or equal to 50%. The median follow-up was 10.4 months (range: 8.4-10.9 mo). For all patients, ORR and disease control rate were 39.8% and 86.1%, respectively. ORR by TPS was 14.7%, 51.4%, and 57.1% in patients with TPS less than 1%, greater than or equal to 1%, and greater than or equal to 50%, respectively. In the 67 programmed death ligand-1-positive patients receiving first-line ivonescimab, the ORR was 33.3%, 52.6%, 60.0%, and 75.0% at the doses of 10 mg/kg Q3W, 20 mg/kg Q2W, 20 mg/kg Q3W, and 30 mg/kg Q3W, respectively. Grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 24 patients (22.2%). TRAEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in one patient (0.9%). TRAEs leading to death occurred in three patients (2.8%) with squamous NSCLC. The occurrence of grade greater than or equal to 3 TRAEs and grade greater than or equal to 3 bleeding events in squamous versus nonsquamous NSCLC patients was 25.5% versus 18.9% and 0.0% versus 1.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ivonescimab monotherapy was well tolerated and found to have a promising efficacy in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov identifier: NCT04900363.

Endostar acts as a pneumonitis protectant in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

CCRT is presently the standard treatment for LA-NSCLC. RP is one of the main obstacles to the completion of thoracic radiation therapy, resulting in limited survival benefits in NSCLC patients. This research aims to explore the role of Endostar in the occurrence of grade≥2 RP and clinical curative effect in LA-NSCLC patients.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 122 patients with stage III NSCLC who received CCRT from December 2008 to December 2017, or Endostar intravenous drip concurrently with chemoradiotherapy (Endostar + CCRT group). Standard toxicity of the pneumonitis endpoint was also collected by CTCAE V5.0. We further summarized other available studies on the role of Endostar in the prognosis of NSCLC patients and the incidence of RP.

RESULTS

There were 76 cases in the CCRT group and 46 cases in the CCRT+ Endostar group. In the CCRT+ Endostar group, the occurrence of grade ≥2 RP in patients with V20Gy ≥25% was significantly higher than that in patients with V20Gy < 25% (p = 0.001). In the cohorts with V20Gy < 25%, 0 cases of 29 patients treated with Endostar developed grade ≥2 RP was lower than in the CCRT group (p = 0.026). The re-analysis of data from other available studies indicated that Endostar plus CCRT could be more efficient and safely in the occurrence of grade≥2 RP with LA-NSCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

When receiving CCRT for LA-NSCLC patients, simultaneous combination of Endostar is recommended to enhance clinical benefit and reduce pulmonary toxicity.

First-line treatment with camrelizumab plus famitinib in advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥1%: results from a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

The combination of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents can synergistically modulate the tumor microenvironment and represents a promising treatment option. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus famitinib (a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) as a first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with a programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥1%, in an open-label, multicenter, phase 2 basket trial.

METHODS

Eligible patients received camrelizumab (200 mg once every 3 weeks via intravenous infusion) plus oral famitinib at an initial dose of 20 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), as assessed by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1. Key secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), duration of respons, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), 12-month OS rate, and safety profile.

RESULTS

Of the enrolled 41 patients, 21 (51.2%) had a PD-L1 TPS of 1-49%. As of the cut-off date on June 22, 2022, the combination regimen of camrelizumab and famitinib achieved an ORR of 53.7% (95% CI 37.4% to 69.3%) and a DCR of 92.7% (95% CI 80.1% to 98.5%). The median PFS was 16.6 months (95% CI 8.3 to not reached), and OS data were not yet mature, with an estimated 12-month OS rate of 76.8% (95% CI 60.0% to 87.3%). The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher included hypertension (22.0%), increased alanine aminotransferase (12.2%), decreased neutrophil count (9.8%), proteinuria (7.3%), decrease platelet count (7.3%), and hypokalemia (7.3%). One (2.4%) patient died from grade 5 hemoptysis, which was considered possibly related to the study treatment by the investigator.

CONCLUSION

Camrelizumab plus famitinib demonstrated promising antitumor activity in advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients and had an acceptable safety profile. These findings suggest that this combination regimen could be an alternative therapeutic option and warrant further investigation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04346381.

Immunotherapy and targeted therapy for cholangiocarcinoma: Artificial intelligence research in imaging

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly aggressive hepatobiliary malignancy, second only to hepatocellular carcinoma in prevalence. Despite surgical treatment being the recommended method to achieve a cure, it is not viable for patients with advanced CCA. Gene sequencing and artificial intelligence (AI) have recently opened up new possibilities in CCA diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis assessment. Basic research has furthered our understanding of the tumor-immunity microenvironment and revealed targeted molecular mechanisms, resulting in immunotherapy and targeted therapy being increasingly employed in the clinic. Yet, the application of these remedies in CCA is a challenging endeavor due to the varying pathological mechanisms of different CCA types and the lack of expressed immune proteins and molecular targets in some patients. AI in medical imaging has emerged as a powerful tool in this situation, as machine learning and deep learning are able to extract intricate data from CCA lesion images while assisting clinical decision making, and ultimately improving patient prognosis. This review summarized and discussed the current immunotherapy and targeted therapy related to CCA, and the research progress of AI in this field.

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for colorectal cancer: Clinical implications and future considerations

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer in the world. The PD-1/PD-L1 pathway plays a crucial role in modulating immune response to cancer, and PD-L1 expression has been observed in tumor and immune cells within the tumor microenvironment of CRC. Thus, immunotherapy drugs, specifically checkpoint inhibitors, have been developed to target the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway, thereby inhibiting the interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1 and restoring T-cell function in cancer cells. However, the emergence of resistance mechanisms can reduce the efficacy of these treatments. To counter this, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been used to improve the efficacy of CRC treatments. mAbs such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab are currently approved for CRC treatment. These antibodies impede immune checkpoint receptors, including PD-1/PD-L1, and their combination therapy shows promise in the treatment of advanced CRC. This review presents a concise overview of the use of the PD-1/PD-L1 blockade as a therapeutic strategy for CRC using monoclonal antibodies and combination therapies. Additionally, this article outlines the function of PD-1/PD-L1 as an immune response suppressor in the CRC microenvironment as well as the potential advantages of administering inflammatory agents for CRC treatment. Finally, this review analyzes the outcomes of clinical trials to examine the challenges of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapeutic resistance.

All-cause and immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute kidney injury in immune checkpoint inhibitor users: a meta-analysis of occurrence rate, risk factors and mortality

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the occurrence rate of ICI-related AKI has not been systematically examined. Additionally, exposure to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were considered as risk factors for AKI, but with inconclusive results in ICI-related AKI. Our aim was to analyse the occurrence rate of all-cause AKI and ICI-related AKI and the occurrence rates of severe AKI and dialysis-requiring AKI, and to determine whether exposure to PPIs and NSAIDs poses a risk for all-cause and ICI-related AKI.

Methods

This study population was adult ICI recipients. A systematic review was conducted by searching MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed through October 2023. We included prospective trials and observational studies that reported any of the following outcomes: the occurrence rate of all-cause or ICI-related AKI, the relationship between PPI or NSAID exposure and AKI development or the mortality rate in the AKI or non-AKI group. Proportional meta-analysis and pairwise meta-analysis were performed. The evidence certainty was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework.

Results

A total of 120 studies comprising 46 417 patients were included. The occurrence rates of all-cause AKI were 7.4% (14.6% from retrospective studies and 1.2% from prospective clinical trials). The occurrence rate of ICI-related AKI was 3.2%. The use of PPIs was associated with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.77 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-2.18] for all-cause AKI and an OR of 2.42 (95% CI 1.96-2.97) for ICI-related AKI. The use of NSAIDs was associated with an OR of 1.77 (95% CI 1.10-2.83) for all-cause AKI and an OR of 2.57 (95% CI 1.68-3.93) for ICI-related AKI.

Conclusions

Our analysis revealed that approximately 1 in 13 adult ICI recipients may experience all-cause AKI, while 1 in 33 adult ICI recipients may experience ICI-related AKI. Exposure to PPIs and NSAIDs was associated with an increased OR risk for AKI in the current meta-analysis.

Anti‐angiogenic therapy enhances cancer immunotherapy: Mechanism and clinical application

Immunotherapy, specifically immune checkpoint inhibitors, is revolutionizing cancer treatment, achieving durable control of previously incurable or advanced tumors. However, only a certain group of patients exhibit effective responses to immunotherapy. Anti‐angiogenic therapy aims to block blood vessel growth in tumors by depriving them of essential nutrients and effectively impeding their growth. Emerging evidence shows that tumor vessels exhibit structural and functional abnormalities, resulting in an immunosuppressive microenvironment and poor response to immunotherapy. Both preclinical and clinical studies have used anti‐angiogenic agents to enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy against cancer. In this review, we concentrate on the synergistic effect of anti‐angiogenic and immune therapies in cancer management, dissect the direct effects and underlying mechanisms of tumor vessels on recruiting and activating immune cells, and discuss the potential of anti‐angiogenic agents to improve the effectiveness of immunotherapy. Lastly, we outline challenges and opportunities for the anti‐angiogenic strategy to enhance immunotherapy. Considering the increasing approval of the combination of anti‐angiogenic and immune therapies in treating cancers, this comprehensive review would be timely and important.

Anti-Angiogenic Agents Combined with Immunotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Anti-angiogenic agents could enhance tumor immunity response, and anti- angiogenesis plus immunotherapy has become a novel treatment option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The efficacy of this combination therapy remains controversial and obscure.

AIM

We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of this therapeutic strategy in patients with advanced NSCLC and provide more guidance for treating NSCLC clinically.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases to identify relevant studies published up to December 2021. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Second endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and grade ≥3 AEs adverse events (AEs). The sensitivity analysis was conducted to confirm the stability of the results. STATA 15.0 was utilized for all pooled analyses.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were eventually included in the meta-analysis, involving 533 patients with advanced NSCLC. The pooled ORR rate was 27% (95% CI 18% to 35%; I2 =84.2%; p<0.001), while the pooled median PFS and OS was 5.84 months (95% CI 4.66 to 7.03 months; I2=78.4%; p<0.001) and 14.20 months (95% CI 11.08 to 17.32 months; I2=82.2%; p=0.001), respectively. Most common grade ≥3 AEs included hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, adrenal insufficiency, hyponatremia, proteinuria, rash, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue.

CONCLUSION

Anti-angiogenesis combined with immunotherapy demonstrated satisfactory antitumor activity and an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with advanced NSCLC. The pooled results of our meta-analysis provided further evidence supporting the favorable efficacy and safety of this therapeutic strategy.

Advances in Predictive Biomarkers for Anti-Angiogenic Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

This study aimed to explore advances in biomarkers related to anti-angiogenic therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), thereby enhancing treatment selection, advancing personalized and precision medicine to improve treatment outcomes and patient survival rates. This article reviews key discoveries in predictive biomarkers for anti-angiogenic therapy in NSCLC in recent years, such as (1) liquid biopsy predictive biomarkers: studies have identified activated circulating endothelial cells (aCECs) via liquid biopsy as potential predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of anti-angiogenic therapy; (2) imaging biomarkers: advanced imaging technologies, such as dynamic contrast-enhanced integrated magnetic resonance positron emission tomography (MR-PET), are used to assess tumor angiogenesis in patients with NSCLC and evaluate the clinical efficacy of anti-angiogenic drugs; (3) genetic predictive biomarkers: research has explored polymorphisms of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1 (VEGFR-1) and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), as well as how plasma levels of VEGF-A can predict the outcomes and prognosis of patients with non-squamous NSCLC undergoing chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab. Despite progress in identifying biomarkers related to anti-angiogenic therapy, several challenges remain, including limitations in clinical trials, heterogeneity in NSCLC, and technical hurdles. Future research will require extensive clinical validation and in-depth mechanistic studies to fully exploit the potential of these biomarkers for personalized treatment.

Cabozantinib plus atezolizumab in previously untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and previously treated gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: results from two expansion cohorts of a multicentre, open-label, phase 1b trial (COSMIC-021)

Background

Cabozantinib is approved for previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) and has been investigated in gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJ). Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is approved for unresectable or metastatic HCC untreated with prior systemic therapy. We evaluated efficacy and safety of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab in aHCC previously untreated with systemic anticancer therapy or previously treated GC/GEJ.

Methods

COSMIC-021 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03170960) is an open-label, phase 1b study in solid tumours with a dose-escalation stage followed by tumour-specific expansion cohorts, including aHCC (cohort 14) and GC/GEJ (cohort 15). Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with measurable locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent disease per RECIST version 1.1. Patients received oral cabozantinib 40 mg daily and intravenous atezolizumab 1200 mg once every 3 weeks until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate per RECIST version 1.1.

Findings

Patients were screened between February 14, 2019, and May 7, 2020, and 61 (30 aHCC, 31 GC/GEJ) were enrolled and received at least one dose of study treatment. Median duration of follow-up was 31.2 months (IQR 28.5-32.7) for aHCC and 30.4 months (28.7-31.9) for GC/GEJ. Objective response rate was 13% (4/30, 95% CI 4-31) for aHCC and 0% (95% CI 0-11) for GC/GEJ. Six (20%) aHCC patients and three (10%) GC/GEJ patients had treatment-related adverse events resulting in discontinuation of either study drug.

Interpretation

Cabozantinib plus atezolizumab had clinical activity with a manageable safety profile in aHCC previously untreated with systemic anticancer therapy. Clinical activity of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab was minimal in previously treated GC/GEJ.

Funding

Exelixis, Inc., Alameda, CA, USA.

Overcoming Resistance Mechanisms to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Leveraging the Anti-Tumor Immune Response

As far back as 3000 years ago, the immune system was observed to play a role in mediating tumor regression. Since then, many strategies have been developed to leverage the anti-tumor immune response. However, while many patients respond to ICIs up front some do not, and many of those that do eventually experience tumor progression. Currently, there are several predictive biomarkers of the immune checkpoint inhibitor response; however, no one test appears to be universally predictive and their application varies by disease site. There are many ways in which cancer cells develop primary or acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Efforts to reverse resistance include ways to combat T cell exhaustion, reprogram the tumor microenvironment, increase the availability of tumor neo-antigens, target alternative immune checkpoints, restore a normal/healthy patient gut microbiome, oncolytic viruses and tumor vaccines. The most studied and most promising methods include combining ICIs with therapies targeting alternative immune checkpoints and restoring a normal/healthy patient gut microbiome. This review will discuss T cell-mediated immunity, how this is leveraged by modern immunotherapy to treat cancer and mechanisms of immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance, while highlighting strategies to overcome primary and secondary resistance mechanisms.

Optimizing the Continuum of Care in Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) still ranks as the fifth most common malignancy and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Despite the recent progress in the therapeutic algorithm of the advanced disease with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and next-generation HER2-directed therapies, survival rates remain poor, with a median survival hardly exceeding 12 months. Furthermore, only 40% of patients remain eligible for second- and later-line treatments due to the aggressiveness of the disease and the rapid deterioration of performance status (PS). Thus, current research is focusing either on the identification of novel treatment options or the development of personalized strategies to optimize the continuum of care and ultimately improve patients' outcome. In this article, we provide an overview of the current treatment landscape for advanced GC with a particular emphasis on later-line treatments and outline novel perspectives on the horizon.

Future Perspectives in the Second Line Therapeutic Setting for Non-Oncogene Addicted Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the management of non-oncogene addicted non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Blocking the anti-PD-1 axis represents the current standard of care in the first-line setting, with drugs administered either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. Despite notable successes achieved with ICIs, most of their long-term benefits are restricted to approximately 20% of patients. Consequently, the post-failure treatment landscape after failure to first-line treatment remains a complex challenge. Currently, docetaxel remains the preferred option, although its benefits remain modest as most patients do not respond or progress promptly. In recent times, novel agents and treatment combinations have emerged, offering fresh opportunities to improve patient outcomes. ICIs combined either with antiangiogenic or other novel immunotherapeutic compounds have shown promising preliminary activity. However, more mature data concerning specific combinations do not support their benefit over standard of care. In addition, antibody-drug conjugates seem to be the most promising alternative among all available compounds according to already-published phase I/II data that will be confirmed in soon-to-be-published phase III trial data. In this report, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current second-line treatment options and discuss future therapeutic perspectives.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and cellular immunotherapy for advanced gastric, gastroesophageal cancer: a long pathway

Although the incidence rate and mortality of gastric/gastroesophageal cancer (G/GEJC) are declining globally, G/GEJC remains a health issue in East Asia. When diagnosed as advanced stage, treatment after serial lines of chemotherapy is limited, with a median overall survival of less than 1 year. Immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and cellular immunotherapy, has changed the prospects of cancer therapy by reversing immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment. As part of this review, we enumerated the clinical uses of ICIs related to the immunosuppressive signaling axis PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4/B7. ICIs were initially approved as a secondary treatment option for patients with severe pretreating advanced gastric and gastroesophageal cancer (AG/GEJC). Till now, it has become the mainstream therapy in combination with chemotherapy and targeted therapy for patients identified by biomarkers. Numerous evidence showed microsatellite instability (MSI), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, tumor mutation burden (TMB) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status might be indicative to the use of ICIs. In addition, we discussed the current limitations and prospects of ICIs in AG/GGEJC, as well as the first clinical application of novel CAR-T cell therapies.

Vascular normalization: reshaping the tumor microenvironment and augmenting antitumor immunity for ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer remains a challenging disease with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a crucial role in tumor growth, progression, and therapy response. One characteristic feature of the TME is the abnormal tumor vasculature, which is associated with inadequate blood perfusion, hypoxia, and immune evasion. Vascular normalization, a therapeutic strategy aiming to rectify the abnormal tumor vasculature, has emerged as a promising approach to reshape the TME, enhance antitumor immunity, and synergize with immunotherapy in ovarian cancer. This review paper provides a comprehensive overview of vascular normalization and its potential implications in ovarian cancer. In this review, we summarize the intricate interplay between anti-angiogenesis and immune modulation, as well as ICI combined with anti-angiogenesis therapy in ovarian cancer. The compelling evidence discussed in this review contributes to the growing body of knowledge supporting the utilization of combination therapy as a promising treatment paradigm for ovarian cancer, paving the way for further clinical development and optimization of this therapeutic approach.

Unveiling the role of GAS41 in cancer progression

GAS41, a member of the human YEATS domain family, plays a pivotal role in human cancer development. It serves as a highly promising epigenetic reader, facilitating precise regulation of cell growth and development by recognizing essential histone modifications, including histone acetylation, benzoylation, succinylation, and crotonylation. Functional readouts of these histone modifications often coincide with cancer progression. In addition, GAS41 functions as a novel oncogene, participating in numerous signaling pathways. Here, we summarize the epigenetic functions of GAS41 and its role in the carcinoma progression. Moving forward, elucidating the downstream target oncogenes regulated by GAS41 and the developing small molecule inhibitors based on the distinctive YEATS recognition properties will be pivotal in advancing this research field.

Research advances in mechanism of antiangiogenic therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Immunotherapy has changed the treatment strategy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in recent years, among which anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies are the most used. However, the majority of patients with NSCLC do not derive benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Vascular abnormalities are a hallmark of most solid tumors and facilitate immune evasion. Thus, combining antiangiogenic therapies might increase the effectiveness of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. In this paper, the mechanisms of anti-angiogenic agents combined with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies are illustrated, moreover, relevant clinical studies and predictive immunotherapeutic biomarkers are summarized and analyzed, in order to provide more treatment options for NSCLC patients.

A randomized double-blind trial of TQB2450 with or without anlotinib in pretreated driver-negative non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Immune monotherapy as second-line treatment confers only modest survival benefit on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with no mutated driver genes, necessitating combination treatment strategies. This phase Ib trial investigated the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-L1 antibody TQB2450 plus antiangiogenic drug anlotinib for NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pretreated stage IIIB or IV NSCLC patients with wild-type EGFR/ALK and minimally one measurable lesion were randomized 1:1:1 to receive TQB2450 1200 mg plus placebo, or TQB2450 1200 mg plus anlotinib 10 or 12 mg. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients received TQB2450 plus placebo and 34 patients each received TQB2450 plus anlotinib 10 mg and 12 mg. At the data cutoff, the median PFS was 8.7 months (95% CI 6.1-17.1) in the TQB2450 plus anlotinib group and 2.8 months (95% CI 1.4-4.7) in the TQB2450 only group. The ORR reached 30.9% (95% CI 20.2%-43.3%) in the TQB2450 plus anlotinib group and was 3.0% (95% CI 0.1%-15.8%) in the TQB2450 only group. In patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1%, the ORR was 50.0% (95% CI 33.4%-66.6%) for TQB2450 plus anlotinib and 5.3% (95% CI 0.1%-26.0%) for TQB2450 plus placebo. No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib plus TQB2450 demonstrated promising antitumor activities in advanced NSCLC patients without EGFR and ALK alterations and the toxicities were overall manageable. The study findings support the continued development of TQB2450 plus anlotinib for advanced NSCLC patients without driver gene alterations.

Current status and future of anti-angiogenic drugs in lung cancer

Lung cancer, as a malignant tumor with both high incidence and mortality in China, is one of the major causes of death in our population and one of the major public health problems in China. Effective treatment of lung cancer is a major public health task for all human beings. Angiogenesis plays an important role in the development of tumor, not only as a basic condition for tumor growth, but also as a significant factor to promote tumor metastasis. Therefore, anti-angiogenesis has become a vital means to inhibit tumor development, and anti-angiogenic drugs can rebalance pro- and anti-angiogenic factors to inhibit tumor cells. This article reviews the mechanism of blood vessel formation in tumor tissues and the mechanism of action of different anti-angiogenic drugs, the combination therapy of anti-angiogenic drugs and other anti-tumor drugs, and the mechanism of anti-angiogenic drug resistance.

Treatment-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with angiogenesis inhibitors have been used to treat advanced lung cancer. Their associated treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) are currently considered acceptable; however, no conclusion has been reached. We aimed to summarize the trAEs caused by ICIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors in patients with advanced lung cancer.

METHODS

Pulled studies met the following criteria: patients with advanced lung cancer who received treatment involving ICIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors (with or without chemotherapy) in interventional or observational studies. Results included the type and number of trAEs or immune-related adverse events (irAEs), treatment-associated discontinuation and mortality, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

PROSPERO

CRD42022337656.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 32 trials involving 2313 patients who had 7768 any-grade trAEs and 1078 grade ≥3 trAEs. The pooled incidences were 87.33% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79.49-93.65; I2 = 94.04%) for any-grade trAEs, and 38.63% (95% CI: 28.28-49.50; I2 = 95.61%) for grade ≥3 trAEs. There were 132 kinds of any-grade trAEs involving 18 systems, and 99 kinds of grade ≥3 trAEs involving 16 systems. For all trAEs, we observed significant differences in the line of therapy, trial design, therapy combination, and types of angiogenesis inhibitors (all P < 0.05). The rate of trAEs increased with dosage and frequency of medication. Pooled incidences of discontinuation and mortality were 10.64% and 0.81%, respectively. Nearly 647 patients experienced irAEs, including 636 any-grade irAEs and 154 grade ≥3 irAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the incidence of trAEs caused by ICIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors is generally acceptable. These trAEs have a wide spectrum nearly covering the full range of adverse events. Grade ≥3 trAEs are more closely associated with angiogenesis inhibitors than any grade. However, treatment-associated mortality remains concerning.

Sintilimab plus anlotinib as second- or third-line therapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: A prospective, single-arm, phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and uncommon EGFR alterations typically have worse treatment outcomes than patients with classically EGFR-mutated NSCLC. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of PD-1 blockade with sintilimab plus anti-angiogenic treatment with anlotinib in patients with NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations after two previous treatments, including a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen and a targeted treatment (or chemotherapy only for patients harboring EGFR ex20ins), received sintilimab combined with anlotinib. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

At data cutoff (September 27, 2022), median follow-up was 22.3 months (range, 1.2-37.6). Among 21 enrolled patients, 12 had EGFR ex20ins and nine had other uncommon EGFR mutations such as L861Q, G719A, and G709X. Overall, eight patients (38.1%) achieved an objective response, and 18 (85.7%) achieved disease control. Median (95% CI) progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.0 (5.4-8.6) months, and median overall survival (OS) was 20.0 (15.6-24.4) months. The 12-month PFS rate (95% CI) was 22.2% (7.4-42.0), and the 12-month OS rate was 66.7% (42.5-82.5). Patients harboring EGFR ex20ins had similar ORR and PFS to those with other mutations. Six patients (28.6%) experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); hand-foot syndrome was the most common grade 3 TRAE (2 patients; 9.5%). No grade ≥4 TRAEs were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of sintilimab and anlotinib demonstrated durable efficacy and was generally well tolerated in patients with NSCLC and uncommon EGFR mutations who had received prior standard-of-care treatments. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04790409).

Advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy for esophageal cancer

ABSTRACT

Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most common aggressive malignant tumors in the digestive system with a severe epidemiological situation and poor prognosis. The early diagnostic rate of EC is low, and most EC patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Multiple multimodality treatments have gradually evolved into the main treatment for advanced EC, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. And the emergence of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has greatly improved the survival of EC patients. This review highlights the latest advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy for EC, discusses the efficacy and safety of relevant drugs, summarizes related important clinical trials, and tries to provide references for therapeutic strategy of EC.