Accelerated partial breast irradiation using sole interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy compared with whole-breast irradiation with boost for early breast cancer: 10-year results of a GEC-ESTRO randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

Partial-breast radiotherapy after breast conservation surgery for women with early breast cancer (UK IMPORT LOW): 10-year outcomes from a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

The IMPORT LOW trial evaluated partial-breast radiotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in women with early-stage breast cancer at below average risk of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR). 5-year results concluded non-inferiority of IBTR for reduced-dose and partial-breast radiotherapy, with similar or lower frequency of adverse effects compared with whole-breast radiotherapy. We report outcomes after 10 years.

METHODS

IMPORT LOW was a randomised, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Women were eligible if they were aged 50 years or older and had had breast conservation surgery for unifocal invasive ductal adenocarcinoma, pT1-2 (tumour size of ≤3 cm), N0-1 (none to three positive axillary nodes), grades 1-3, with microscopic margins of non-cancerous tissue of 2 mm or more. Patients were ineligible if they had a previous malignancy of any kind (except non-melanomatous skin cancer), had undergone mastectomy, or had received neoadjuvant or concurrent adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by randomly permuted blocks to radiotherapy regimens of 40 Gy in 15 fractions to the whole breast (whole-breast group), 36 Gy in 15 fractions to the whole breast plus 40 Gy in 15 fractions to the partial breast (reduced-dose group), or 40 Gy in 15 fractions to the partial breast (partial-breast group). Participants were stratified by treatment centre, without masking. The primary endpoint was IBTR. 10-year outcomes were analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Clinician-reported late adverse effects were evaluated in all participants with available data analysed according to allocated treatment. The study is registered in the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN12852634) and is now complete.

FINDINGS

2018 patients were recruited between May 3, 2007, and Oct 5, 2010, from 30 radiotherapy centres in the UK and randomly assigned to the whole-breast group (n=675), reduced-dose group (n=674), or partial-breast group (n=669). Two participants subsequently withdrew consent. Median age was 63 years (IQR 58-68). 854 (42%) of 2016 patients had grade 1 tumours, 959 (48%) had grade 2 tumours, and 200 (10%) had grade 3 tumours (three tumours were ungradable); 59 (3%) had node-positive disease. Median follow-up was 120 months (IQR 119-122) for the whole-breast group, 121 months (IQR 120-122) for the reduced-dose group, and 120 months (IQR 119-122) for the partial-breast group. By 10 years, IBTR events were reported for 45 of 2016 participants: 17 of 674 in the whole-breast group, 11 of 673 in the reduced-dose group, and 17 of 669 in the partial-breast group, with cumulative incidence of 2·8% (95% CI 1·8-4·5), 1·9% (1·1-3·5), and 3·0% (1·9-4·8), respectively. The estimated absolute difference in 10-year IBTR incidence was -1·02% (95% CI -1·98 to 0·99) for the reduced-dose group and 0·16% (-1·28 to 2·89) for the partial-breast group compared with the whole-breast group. Similar low levels of moderate or marked adverse effects were recorded for participants in all three groups in 10-year clinical assessments. Breast shrinkage had the highest incidence (30 [9%] of 321 in the whole-breast group, 28 [9%] of 322 in the reduced-dose group, and 22 [7%] of 333 in the partial-breast group).

INTERPRETATION

Long-term follow-up provides further evidence that partial-breast and reduced-dose radiotherapy are as safe and effective as whole-breast radiotherapy in patients with low-risk early breast cancer. These results reaffirm the use of partial-breast radiotherapy delivered with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in this population as standard of care.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK.

Long-term outcomes of three distinct once-daily schedules for accelerated partial breast irradiation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To date, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) regimens are highly heterogeneous. Twice-daily schedules show comparable local control to whole-breast radiotherapy but with worse toxicity and cosmesis profiles. Conversely, once-daily regimens are better tolerated, though dose and number of fractions are yet not standardized. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of three different once-daily APBI schedules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three consecutive phase-2 trials were conducted at a single national cancer center to assess three once-daily APBI schedules (40Gy in 10 fractions, 35Gy in 7 fractions, and 28Gy in 4 fractions) delivered with 3D-conformal radiotherapy. All patients were at least 60 years old and had early-stage breast cancer (pT1-2,pN0-N1mic). Toxicity and cosmesis were evaluated by physicians using the CTCAE 4.0 scale and the Harvard score, respectively. Recurrence rates and survival outcomes at 5 and 10 years were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 189 patients were enrolled, with a median follow-up of 10.2 years. Patients treated with 40Gy in 10 fractions, 35Gy in 7 fractions and 28Gy in 4 fractions were 80 (42%), 73 (39%), and 36 (19%), respectively. Acute toxicity was low and comparable across schedules, whereas grade≥2 late toxicity and poor cosmesis were significantly worse with the shorter schedule. The 10-year estimated in-breast tumour recurrence rate was 5.5%, comparable to the limited literature reporting long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily APBI delivered with 3D-conformal radiotherapy was effective; however, regimens with fewer than 5 fractions may be associated with increased toxicity and worse cosmesis.

The role of antimicrobial prophylaxis in brachytherapy for prostate, breast and gynaecological cancer: a narrative review

Proper antimicrobial prophylaxis is critical for reducing the risk of infection during interventional procedures. Brachytherapy, a highly effective radiation therapy for various malignancies, allows for precise radiation delivery; however, the use of foreign material as instrumentation for brachytherapy potentially increases the risk of infection. Understanding infectious complications and proper antimicrobial use in this case is essential for successful outcomes and patient safety. The aim of this review is to provide insights and summarize existing information on the infectious complications of brachytherapy in prostate, breast and gynaecological (cervical and endometrial) cancer, as well as on the potential benefit, if any, of administering antimicrobial prophylaxis. Infectious complication rates in prostate, breast and gynaecological cancer brachytherapy remain low with diverse prophylactic regimens, emphasizing the need to identify risk factors for tailored practices. The choice of the antimicrobial regimen, type of device and modality influences the probability of infectious complications. There is minimal overlap of existing brachytherapy guidelines with surgical prophylaxis guidelines. Infectious outcomes and antimicrobial resistance are underreported, and guidance for antimicrobial-resistant organisms is scarce. When indicated, prophylaxis for less than 24 h is efficient. More studies oriented towards antimicrobial prophylaxis on this specific population are needed.

Impact of the ASTRO 2024 Guideline on Partial Breast Irradiation Eligibility in Breast Cancer Patients (KROG 24-01)

PURPOSE

The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) has recently published new guidelines for the eligibility for partial breast irradiation (PBI). This study aims to evaluate the eligibility rates of PBI according to the ASTRO 2017 and 2024 guidelines.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients diagnosed with pTis-T2N0 breast cancer in 2019 from 3 tertiary medical centers were accrued. All patients received standard treatment consisting of breast-conserving surgery followed by radiation therapy. Subsequently, patients were classified according to the ASTRO 2017 and 2024 guidelines.

RESULTS

For invasive breast cancer, 785 patients were included, among whom 192 received PBI. Classification according to the ASTRO guidelines showed a substantial increase in the proportion of patients eligible for PBI: 19.2% were classified as "suitable" under the ASTRO 2017 guidelines, while 42.4% were classified as "strongly recommended" under the ASTRO 2024 guidelines. Among 286 patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 50 (17.5%) received PBI. The proportion of PBI-eligible patients nearly doubled, from 27.3% under the ASTRO 2017 guidelines to 51.7% under the ASTRO 2024 guidelines. The expanded age criterion from 50 to 40 years and the removal of the clear resection margin requirement were key factors contributing to this substantial increase in both invasive breast cancer and DCIS.

CONCLUSIONS

The eligibility for PBI has dramatically increased for both invasive breast cancer and DCIS under the ASTRO 2024 guidelines. These findings suggest a potential for increased use of PBI, offering individualized and optimized treatment options in early breast cancer.

Mapping the current landscape of locoregional therapy de-escalation trials in early breast cancer: a systematic review

A systematic review undertaken to map the current landscape of locoregional de-escalation trials to inform future research. Online databases and trial registries were searched to identify ongoing, recently completed or published studies de-escalating surgery or radiotherapy in patients with early breast cancer. 97 trials evaluated de-escalation of surgery or radiotherapy in up to 94,866 participants. Surgery studies more commonly evaluated treatment omission/reduction after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) and de-escalation of nodal treatment. Radiotherapy studies were more frequently biomarker stratified. Patients were rarely involved in study design. Research questions focused on response-adjusted treatment after NST and omission/reduction of locoregional therapy in patients with low- or intermediate-risk disease. Significant duplication was identified with multiple studies addressing similar questions. This systematic review demonstrates that the current de-escalation portfolio is inefficient, lacks patient focus and needs improvement. An internationally collaborative approach using innovative study designs and patient partnership will be essential to address this.

Reimagining Deintensification for Low-Risk Breast Cancer

As outcomes for low-risk breast cancer continue to improve, research and clinical paradigms are increasingly focused on appropriate deintensification with the goal of improving the therapeutic ratio of breast cancer treatment. These deintensification approaches span across disciplines including breast surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy. With regard to breast surgery, studies have continued to push deintensification when it comes to surgical margins with breast conservation, reducing re-excision rates, whereas deintensification of axillary surgery has reduced the rates of axillary lymph node dissection and increasingly the need for any axillary surgery, including sentinel lymph node biopsy for low-risk patients. With regard to radiation therapy, studies have allowed for a drastic reduction in treatment duration, whereas approaches that reduce the target of treatment have led to a change from from treatment daily for 5-7 weeks to many low-risk patients completing treatment in just five treatments. With regard to systemic therapy, use of genomic assays and tumor biology has led to reduced utilization of cytotoxic chemotherapy, with studies also allowing for dose reduction of endocrine therapy for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. Moving forward, greater focus should be placed on interdisciplinary deintensification approaches such as the consideration of radiation therapy alone as compared with endocrine therapy alone for low-risk breast cancers.

Long-term local control and cosmesis of perioperative interstitial brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation following breast-conserving surgery

PURPOSE

Multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) is an established technique of partial breast irradiation (PBI). However, postoperative catheter implant is an invasive, inconvenient, and skillful procedure. In this study, local control and cosmesis of perioperative interstitial brachytherapy (PIB) by intraoperative catheter implant were evaluated by comparing with those of whole breast irradiation (WBI) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

METHODS

Between October 2007 and August 2019, consequent patients who underwent either PIB or WBI following BCS were included. In general, additional indications for PIB to WBI included age ≥ 40 years, tumor ≤ 3 cm, and pN0 or pNmi. WBI was initiated with a total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, whereas PBI was delivered immediately following BCS at 32 Gy in eight fractions. Local recurrence (LR) was the primary endpoint, and subjective and objective cosmetic outcomes at 5 years using the Harvard Cosmesis Scale and BCCT.core software, respectively, were the secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

During the 10-year follow-up, the crude rate of LR was 3.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3-5.4) in 577 patients receiving PIB and 3.3% (95% CI 1.1-5.6) in 241 patients receiving WBI (P = 0.73). The 5- and 10-year LR-free survival rates in the PBI and WBI cohorts were 97.9% versus 97.9% and 95.4% versus 96.8%, respectively (P = 0.64). Multivariate analysis selected age < 50 years as an independent risk factor for LR. Excellent or good cosmesis in the PBI and WBI cohorts assessed by subjective and objective measures was 89.5% versus 84.5% (P = 0.26) and 83.7% versus 68.1% (P < 0.005), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this study was based on a retrospective chart review in a single institution, the largest series of data with a long follow-up suggested that acceptable local tumor control and cosmesis were achieved following PIB compared with WBI.

Navigating through recent evidence on locoregional breast cancer radiotherapy: an initiative by the scientific association of Swiss radiation oncology

PURPOSE

Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent cancer in women and radiotherapy (RT) is an integral part of its treatment. High-level evidence guides clinical decisions, but given the abundance of guidelines, a need to navigate within the evidence has been identified by the board of the Scientific Association of Swiss Radiation Oncology (SASRO). A pilot project was initiated aiming to create an overview of recent clinically relevant evidence for BC RT, to make it easily available to (radiation) oncologists and radiation oncologists in training.

METHODS

A panel of 10 radiation oncology experts for BC RT, one expert in BC surgery, and one expert in BC medical oncology critically reviewed the relevant literature. The panel comprehensively represented different geographical regions of Switzerland as well as university, cantonal, and private institutions. We sought to create a consensual overview of the most relevant questions in BC RT today, accompanied by the most recent and relevant available evidence.

RESULTS

From January 2023 to January 2024, the panel met four times to review and work on an initial draft. The final draft was reviewed and accepted by all panelists. We hereby publish this work to make it available to international audiences. After publication, the work will be made available to all SASRO members on the SASRO website. This work is to be updated every 2 years.

CONCLUSION

The identified need was addressed with a successful pilot project and will be further expanded upon in other tumor pathologies.

Hypofractionated partial breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for patients with early stage breast cancer in China Mainland: a single-arm prospective trial

To report the results of a single-arm, prospective partial breast irradiation (PBI) trial from China mainland using a dose of 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions delivered with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique for patients with early stage breast cancer. Patients aged ≥ 50 years who underwent breast-conserving surgery for unifocal non-lobular invasive breast cancer, with pathological T1 disease, clear margins, negative axillary nodes, and positive hormonal receptors, were recruited. The primary endpoint was 3-year cosmetic deterioration, and secondary endpoints included adverse events, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), regional recurrence, and survivals. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (registration No. NCT03411174). From Jan of 2015 to July of 2018, 208 out of 222 patients recruited were evaluable and included in final analysis. The median follow-up was 66.3 (range: 42.0-105.4) months. The 3-year overall cosmetic deterioration rate was 3.5%. The rates of grade 2 radiation dermatitis and breast induration was 5.8% and 1.5%, respectively. No one experienced ≥ grade 2 breast pain, edema, or telangiectasia. The 5-year cumulative incidence of IBTR and RR was 0.5%. No one developed DM. The 5-year DFS was 99.0%. Four patients died from non-breast cancer causes, and the 5- year OS was 97.9%. In conclusion, we observed lower rates of cosmetic deterioration, IBTR, and ≥ grade 2 acute/late normal tissue effects following PBI with a moderately hypofractionated regimen delivered with IMRT technique. Therefore, this regimen represents an attractive option when an external beam PBI approach is chosen to treat a patient with low-risk early breast cancer.

Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Radiofrequency Ablation and Iodine-125 Seed Implantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in High-Risk Locations: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Background & Aims

The effect of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (TACE-RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk locations is not satisfactory. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of TACE-RFA plus iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation (TACE-RFA-125I) therapy with those of TACE-RFA for unresectable HCC (≤5 cm) in high-risk locations.

Methods

From January 2010 to June 2023, the clinical data of 126 patients with unresectable HCC (≤5 cm) in high-risk locations who received TACE-RFA-125I or TACE-RFA treatment were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared after propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

Results

Forty-six pairs of patients were matched. The local progression-free survival rates at 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-years were 100%, 82.4%, 74.8%, 63.5%, and 54% in the TACE-RFA-125I group, which were significantly higher than 91.3%, 69.4%, 50.7%, 29.4%, and 26.7% in the TACE-RFA group, respectively (p = 0.004). The median progression-free survival in the TACE-RFA-125I group was significantly longer than that in the TACE-RFA group (p = 0.002). The overall survival rates at 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-years were 100%, 93.4%, 80.7%, 74.9%, and 64.7% in the TACE-RFA-125I group, which were significantly higher than 97.8%, 78%, 68.6%, 51.1%, and 45.3% in the TACE-RFA group, respectively (p = 0.011). There was no occurrence of major complications or procedure-related deaths in the two groups.

Conclusion

Compared with the TACE-RFA treatment, TACE-RFA-125I should be a more effective treatment strategy for patients with unresectable HCC (≤5 cm) in high-risk locations.

Quality of life in early breast cancer patients after adjuvant accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) in randomized trial

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) represents a valid option for adjuvant therapy of selected early breast cancer (BC). This single-institution prospective randomized study compares the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between women treated with the highly conformal-external beam APBI technique and those with the more commonly used moderately hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (hypo-WBI). Eligible patients were women over 50 years with early BC (G1/2 DCIS ≤ 25 mm or G1/2 invasive non-lobular luminal-like HER2 negative carcinoma ≤ 20 mm) after breast-conserving surgery with negative margins. APBI arm consisted of 30 Gy in 5 consecutive daily fractions and WBI arm of 40 Gy in 15 fractions plus 10 Gy in 5 fractions boost to the tumor bed. Patients were requested to complete the official Czech translation of the EORTC QoL questionnaires, including QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR45, before radiation (baseline), at the end of radiation (M0) and 1 (M1), 3 (M3), 6 (M6), 12 (M12), and 24 (M24) months after radiation. Linear regression models were used to analyze differences in HRQoL between the arms. The 85 enrolled patients exhibited no differences in HRQoL scores between the two arms at baseline. Patients in the APBI arm reported more favorable global health status at M6 (p = 0.055). Other functional scales showed a decrease in the WBI arm at M0 (p = 0.027 for physical functioning). During radiation, symptoms scores increased. Significant between-group differences were observed for the pain (p = 0.002), systemic therapy side effects (p = 0.004), and breast symptoms (p < 0.001) scales at M0, with higher scores in the WBI arm. During follow-up, scores on symptoms scales returned to at least the baseline values. Early BC patients treated with APBI showed non-inferior short-term and late HRQoL outcomes compared to hypo-WBI. In addition to previous findings regarding toxicity, promising pain and breast symptoms results, suggest that APBI should be strongly considered as a treatment option for selected low-risk patients.Trial registration NCT06007118, August 23, 2023 (retrospectively registered).

The current status of brachytherapy in Europe - A GEC-ESTRO Brachy-HERO survey

A survey regarding utilisation of brachytherapy was distributed to European brachytherapy professionals. Eighty replies from 26 countries were received, two of which were outside Europe. The replies showed that brachytherapy is still widely used. The main indications for brachytherapy are gynaecological and prostate cancer, with >80 % of the responding countries performing brachytherapy for these indications. There is on average one brachytherapy centre per 0.8 million inhabitants, ranging from 0.4 per million to 2.3 per million inhabitants. The organisation of brachytherapy on national levels also varies from country to country, with less than half of the countries having a central brachytherapy registry. All in all, the survey shows that brachytherapy still plays a role on modern radiotherapy, but the field could benefit from a stronger collaboration both nationally and internationally.

Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Critical Review of Current and Emerging Practice

Breast-conserving surgery followed by adjuvant radiation to reduce the risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence is the mainstay of treatment for early-stage breast cancer (ESBC). However, improved understanding of the heterogeneity of the clinical and molecular characteristics of ESBC has led to greater efforts to personalize approaches to treatment. Furthermore, advances in the understanding of the radiobiology of breast cancer have led to several practice-changing trials on the effectiveness and tolerability of moderate and ultrahypofractionated radiation. Here, we review the recent evidence and ongoing research in the radiotherapeutic management of ESBC, including the use of boost for high-risk disease and opportunities for accelerated fractionation, partial breast irradiation, and radiation omission for low-risk disease. We also discuss how molecular profiling can inform decision-making and new opportunities for primary radiation therapy and reirradiation.

Five-year results of the very accelerated partial breast irradiation VAPBI phase I-II GEC-ESTRO trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The standard partial breast postoperative treatment for early breast carcinomas with multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIBT) requires 7-8 fractions in 4-5 days as used in the APBI GEC-ESTRO phase III trial. In 2017 the GEC-ESTRO Breast Cancer Working Group started a Phase I-II trial to study if very accelerated partial breast irradiation (VAPBI) using 3-4 fractions could be equivalent.

MATERIAL

81 patients with low-risk invasive carcinomas underwent high dose rate MIBT. Mean age was 68 (51-90); 33 women received 4 fractions of 6.25 Gy in 2-3 days, and 48 subsequent patients 3 fractions of 7.45 Gy in 2 days, 36 perioperatively and 45 postoperatively.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 62 months, with 5-year actuarial breast recurrence of 3.4 % (two cases). One patient died due to metastasis. Pigmentation changes in the entrance of tubes remained visible only in 12.3 % in long term (skin G1 toxicity). Fibrosis or slight induration (G1) in 22.2 % and G2 in 9.9 %. No case of telangiectasia has been described. Cosmetic outcome is good or excellent in 95 % and fair in 5 %. Four tumors located in the retroareolar area showed nipple retraction.

CONCLUSION

VAPBI with MIBT using four fractions of 6.25 Gy or three fractions of 7.45 Gy in two or three days offers good local control, with a 5-year rate of fibrosis G2 similar to the GEC ESTRO phase III trial. VAPBI in two days is a good choice to decrease the total time of treatment, which is beneficial for the patient and reduces the workload.

The Assisi think tank focus review on postoperative radiation for lobular breast cancer

The "Assisi Think Tank Meeting" (ATTM) on Breast Cancer, endorsed by the European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO), and conducted under the auspices of the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA), is a bi-annual meeting aiming to identify major clinical challenges in breast cancer radiation therapy (RT) and proposing clinical trials to address them. The topics discussed at the meeting are pre-selected by the steering committee. At the meeting, these topics are discussed in different working groups (WG), after preparation of the meeting by performing a systematic review of existing data and of ongoing trials. Prior to the meeting, each WG designs a survey on the topic to be discussed to reflect current clinical practice and to identify areas requiring further research. Herein, we present the work done by the Assisi WG focusing on lobular carcinoma and the RT perspectives in its treatment, including providing recommendations for locoregional therapy, mainly RT for patients with non-metastatic lobular breast cancer.

Measuring patient reported outcomes in brachytherapy: Why we should do it and more importantly how

As the treatment for cancer improves and advances are made, the clinical focus is often on treatment response and survival. However, these are not the only factors which are important to patients. More patients are living longer after cancer treatment and therefore it is important that we can describe not only the treatment to patients but also what their life will be like during and after treatment. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) allow us to describe these. Although there are a range of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) available to the clinician to assess these, the use of them in many areas of brachytherapy lags behind ideal levels. Brachytherapy has many features that differ to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) yet the assessment of quality of life during and after treatment is much more scarce than EBRT. Brachytherapy is often used in the setting of organ preservation or in place of radical surgery, yet there is a paucity of quality of life data comparing the different treatment modalities. This review article will aim to elaborate on the evidence that exists in the use of specific PROMs within prostate, breast and gynaecologic cancers and describe the development of a novel PROMs approach in rectal brachytherapy which aims to identify and resolve symptoms at an early stage.

A systematic review on the techniques, long-term outcomes, and complications of partial breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of four techniques of partial breast irradiation (PBI) including interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT), balloon-based brachytherapy (BBT), Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in the treatment for early-stage breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery. A systematic search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases. The inclusion criteria were clinical trials and observational studies that reported on outcome measures of principal PBI techniques. The methodological quality of the included research data was assessed using bias risk assessment tool with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS), and the research information were analyzed using data analysis software. Clinical studies were collected from the earliest available date until September 2023. Fifty-one studies were included, with a total sample size of 7708. The results of network meta-analysis (NMA) showed that ISBT can lower the local recurrence (SUCRA: 73.8%). In terms of reducing distant metastasis, 3DCRT may be the best choice (SUCRA: 52.5%). And IORT has the highest 5-year overall survival (SUCRA: 90%). Furthermore, ISBT also has the advantages of lowest risk with fat necrosis (SUCRA: 72.5%), infection (SUCRA: 78.3%) and breast pain (SUCRA: 86.2%). BBT may be the optimal solution for fibrosis (SUCRA: 76.9%) and hyperpigmentation (SUCRA: 66.7%). 3DCRT has lower incidence of telangiectasia (SUCRA: 56.7%) and better cosmetic result (SUCRA: 85%). Postoperative PBI treatment using ISBT after breast-conserving surgery in patients with early-stage breast cancer may be a more valuable choice based on the treatment efficacy and is associated with fewer late side-effects. Large-scale, prospective, long-term studies are warranted to clarify the role of different PBI techniques in selected patients.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy using CyberKnife versus interstitial brachytherapy in accelerated partial breast irradiation on left-sided breast: A comparison of dosimetric characteristics and preliminary clinical results

INTRODUCTION

We compared the dosimetric characteristics of the target and organs at risk (OARs) as well as the preliminary clinical outcomes between two accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) techniques.

METHODS

Forty-four patients diagnosed with left-sided early breast cancer who underwent APBI using either interstitial brachytherapy (IB) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with CyberKnife (CK) were retrospectively reviewed. The dosimetric parameters of the target and OARs were compared. Preliminary clinical outcomes, including tumor control and acute toxicity, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Treatment plans with CK demonstrated a better cardiac dose-sparing effect. Radiation doses to the heart at V150cGy for the CK and IB groups were 24.4 % and 60.4 %, respectively (p < 0.001), while the mean heart doses for the CK and IB groups were 107.4 cGy and 204 cGy, respectively (p < 0.001). The heart D1c.c. and the ipsilateral lung received a lower dose in the IB group, without any significant differences. The median follow-up time in the CK and IB groups was 28.6 and 61.3 months, respectively. No patients died from either breast cancer or cardiac events during follow-up. A locoregional recurrence event at the neck occurred in one patient within the IB group.

CONCLUSIONS

APBI planned by CK was shown to have a better dose-sparing effect on the heart, as well as better conformity and homogeneity to the target. CK is a non-invasive treatment which showed minimal acute toxicity and promising tumor control.

Utility of Clinical-Pathological Parameters for Exclusion of BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers as Candidates for Partial Breast Irradiation

PURPOSE

Several international groups have published guidelines to identify low-risk breast cancer (BC) patients who are eligible for partial breast irradiation (PBI). These include the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and ESTRO subgroups such as the Intraoperative radiation (IORT) Task Force and Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie (GEC) -ESTRO. Only ASTRO guidelines recommend against the use of PBI in known carriers of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1/2. The aim of this study was to evaluate the proportion of BC patients, subsequently found to be BRCA1/2 PV carriers who would be eligible for PBI based on clinical-pathologic criteria of the above-mentioned international guidelines.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data were extracted from the medical records of consecutive BC BRCA1/2 PV carriers treated at a single institution between 2006 and 2023. Data included patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and disease outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 498 patients with 518 primary tumors were analyzed. Of these, 282 (12 of them with synchronous bilateral disease) presented with unknown genetic status at diagnosis and formed the study cohort. The median age at diagnosis was 42.7 years (range, 23.8-77.9). Based on the recent ASTRO guidelines (not including conditionally recommended criteria), 17 of 294 (5.8%) of the carriers had tumors that would be eligible for PBI, including 3 Her2-positive tumors and 5 patients diagnosed between ages 40 and 49 years. Using the ESTRO IORT and the ACROP-ESTRO PBI criteria, 9 of 294 (3%) would be eligible, whereas with the GEC-ESTRO low-risk criteria, 31 of 294 (10.5%) of the carriers would be eligible, and their intermediate risk criteria would increase eligibility for PBI by an additional 8.2% (overall 18.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Using clinical-pathologic criteria published in international guidelines, 3% to 18% of BRCA1/2 PV carriers will have tumors eligible for PBI. Therefore, especially in populations who are at high risk for being BRCA1/2 PV carriers, we recommend adhering to stricter guidelines. In our cohort, ASTRO, ESTRO-IORT, and ESTRO PBI had the lowest probability of identifying BRCA1/2 PV carriers as eligible for PBI.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of intraoperative electron radiation therapy delivered with a dedicated mobile linac for partial breast irradiation in early breast cancer

• PBI is valid alternative to WBI in patients at low-risk of local relapse. • PBI is delivered by means of various techniques, one of which is IOeRT. • After IOeRT, an unexpectedly high LR rate was observed in the only phase III RCT. • Patient selection impacts on LR rates after IOeRT. • With appropriate patient selection IOeRT outcomes overlap with other RT techniques.

Long-term results of intraoperative multicatheter breast implant (IOMBI) for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) on early breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Multicatheter breast brachytherapy is a standard technique for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) in early breast cancer patients. Intraoperative multicatheter breast implant (IOMBI) followed by perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (PHDRBT) offers a novel and advantageous approach. We present long-term oncological, toxicity, and cosmesis outcomes for a well-experienced single institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible women aged ≥ 40 years with clinically and radiologically confirmed unifocal invasive or in situ ≤ 3 cm breast tumors underwent IOMBI during breast-conserving surgery. Patients meeting APBI criteria by definitive pathologic results received 3.4 Gy × 10fx with PHDRBT. Patients not suitable for APBI received PHDRBT-boost followed by WBRT.

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients underwent IOMBI during BCS, 120 patients (70.1 %) were suitable for APBI and 51 (29.8 %) for anticipated PHDRBT-boost. The median age was 61 years (range: 40-78), the median tumor size was 1.1 cm (range: 0.2-3.5), with a histological diagnosis of invasive ductal carcinoma in 78.9 % and ductal in situ in 21.1 %. A median of 9 catheters (range: 4-14) were used. For APBI, the median CTV and V100 were 40.8 cc (range: 8.6-99) and 35.4 cc (range: 7.2-94). The median of healthy breast tissue irradiated represents 7.2 % (range: 2.3-28 %) and the median local treatment duration was 10 days (range: 7-16). With a median follow-up of 8.8 years (range: 0.3-16.25), the 8-year local, locoregional, and distant control rates were 99 %, 98.1 %, and 100 %. G1-G2 late-toxicity rate was 53.4 %. Long-term cosmetic evaluation was excellent-good in 90.8 %.

CONCLUSION

IOMBI&PHDRBT program reports excellent long-term oncological outcomes, with a reduction from unnecessary irradiation exposure which translates into low long-term toxicity and good cosmesis outcomes, especially on well-selected APBI patients.

Hypofractionated whole breast IMRT with HDR brachytherapy boost in early-stage breast cancer: Long-term results from a single-center

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

The addition of a boost to the lumpectomy bed after whole-breast (WB) radiotherapy plays a key role in the treatment of patients with breast cancer (BC). The clinical benefits of a boost with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) after conventional fractionation is supported by a large body of evidence. However, few studies have described its outcomes after a hypofractionated scheme.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included all patients treated with adjuvant WB-IMRT in 15 sessions followed by a single-session HDR-BT boost with local anesthesia on an outpatient basis.

RESULTS

Between 2009 and 2017, 638 patients with early-stage BC were treated according to the aforementioned protocol after breast-conserving surgery. Median follow-up was 6 years (4-11). Despite the low incidence of side effects and their slightness, we did identify an impact of breast volume on the risk of acute radiodermatitis, fibrosis, pain and edema. However, we did not identify any relationship between the volume in cubic centimeters of the BT-implant with acute or long-term side effects. 2.2% patients had an actual local relapse, 2.4% a 2nd primary in the same breast and 2.39% were diagnosed with contralateral BC. Event-free survival at 11 years was 85.5% with an overall survival of 95.7%.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant hypofractionated whole-breast IMRT followed by a single dose HDR-BT boost has a low incidence of acute and chronic toxicity and excellent oncological outcomes. However, it may be worthwhile to intensify self-care protocols and surveillance in women with large breasts who may be at increased risk of side effects.

Preliminary report on ultrashort perioperative partial-breast irradiation with multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy for early-stage breast cancer

PURPOSE

Perioperative partial-breast irradiation (PBI) with multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) is less invasive and more convenient than postoperative one. This study aimed to compare ultrashort perioperative MIB-PBI (uPBI) and conventional perioperative MIB-PBI (cPBI) performed during the same period of time.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria of the study were patients aged ≥ 40 years and those with T0-2 (≤ 3 cm), N0-mi, and negative margins on mammography. The locoregional recurrence (LRR) and toxicity rates were compared between uPBI at a dose of 25.2 Gy in four fractions and cPBI at a dose of 32 Gy in eight fractions.

RESULTS

In total, 198 patients (151 with uPBI and 47 with cPBI) were evaluated. At a median follow-up of 20.1 months, one (0.66%) patient in the uPBI group had LRR. The 2-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence-free survival rates of the uPBI and cPBI groups were 98.7% and 100%, respectively. The highest toxicity grades were grade 1 in 23 (15.2%) and grade 2 in 2 (1.3%) patients in the uPBI group, and grade 1 in 8 (17.0%) and grade 2 in 1 (2.1%) patient in the cPBI group. None of the patients in the two groups presented with grade 3 and higher toxicities. The toxicity rates between the two groups did not significantly differ. Further, 22 (14.6%) patients in the uPBI group and 8 (17.0%) in the cPBI group, and 3 (2.0%) patients in the uPBI group and 1 (2.1%) in the cPBI had acute and late toxicities, respectively. The timing of toxicity development between the two groups did not significantly differ.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this preliminary report included a small sample size and had a short follow-up period, the local control and toxicity rates were similar between the uPBI and cPBI groups. Further research is warranted to investigate the ideal dose schedule of MIB-PBI.

Very accelerated partial breast irradiation in 1 or 2 days: Late toxicity and early oncological outcome of the GEC-ESTRO VAPBI cohort

PURPOSE

To analyze late toxicity after very accelerated partial breast irradiation (VAPBI) for low-risk breast cancer.

MATERIALS

Methods: In this retrospective, observational, international multicenter study (HDH F20220713143949), patients with low-risk breast cancer underwent lumpectomy + vAPBI (high-dose rate multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy-MIBT). VAPBI was performed with 4(4x6.2 Gy/2d), 3(3x7.45 Gy/2d) or 1 fraction (1x16Gy or 1x18Gy/1d). Primary endpoint was late toxicity. Secondary endpoints were cumulative incidence of breast cancer local relapse (LR) and distant metastatic relapse (DMR) and specific (SS) and overall (OS) survivals. Prognostic factors for late toxicity were analyzed.

RESULTS

From 01/2012 to 06/2022, 516 pts with early breast cancer were enrolled. Median follow-up was 44 months [95 %CI 39-46]. Median age was 71 years [40-100]. Median tumor size was 12 mm [1-35]. VAPBI delivered 1, 3 and 4 fractions for 205pts (39.7 %), 167pts (32.4 %) and 144pts (28 %) respectively. 221 late toxicity events were observed in 168pts (32.6 %) (Fibrosis, dyschromia, pain and telangiectasia). Grade 2 and 3 late toxicities were observed in 7.2 and 0.6 % respectively (no G4) with no difference between 1 and ≥ 2 treatment days. CTV > 50 cc (p = 0.007) and V150 > 40 % (p = 0.027) were prognostic factors for G ≥ 2 late toxicity. Four-year cumulative incidence rates of LR and DMR were 2 % [95 %CI 0-3] and 1 % [95 %CI 0-2] respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

VAPBI based on 1 or ≥ 2 days of MIBT represents an attractive de-escalation of irradiation approach for low-risk breast cancer. Late toxicity profile appears acceptable while early oncological outcome shows encouraging local control. Longer follow-up is warranted in order to confirm these preliminary results.

Tools to Guide Radiation Oncologists in the Management of DCIS

Similar to invasive breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ is also going through a phase of changes not only from a technical but also a conceptual standpoint. From prescribing radiotherapy to everyone to personalized approaches, including radiotherapy omission, there is still a lack of a comprehensive framework to guide radiation oncologists in decision making. Many pieces of the puzzle are finding their place as high-quality data mature and are disseminated, but very often, the interpretation of risk factors and the perception of risk remain very highly subjective. Sharing the therapeutic choice with patients requires effective communication for an understanding of risks and benefits, facilitating an informed decision that does not increase anxiety and concerns about prognosis. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize the current state of knowledge to highlight the tools available to radiation oncologists for managing DCIS, with an outlook on future developments.

Assessment of Eligibility and Utilization of Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation in Korean Breast Cancer Patients (KROG 22-15)

PURPOSE

We investigated the proportions of patients eligible for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) among those with pT1-2N0 breast cancer, based on the criteria set by the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), the Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO), the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), and the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBS). Additionally, we analyzed the rate of APBI utilization among eligible patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with pT1-2N0 breast cancer in 2019 were accrued in four tertiary medical centers in Korea. All patients had undergone breast conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy, either whole breast irradiation or APBI. To determine which guideline best predicts the use of APBI in Korea, the F1 score and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) were determined for each guideline.

RESULTS

A total of 1,251 patients were analyzed, of whom 196 (15.7%) underwent APBI. The percentages of eligible patients identified by the ASTRO, GEC-ESTRO, ABS, and ASBS criteria were 13.7%, 21.0%, 50.5%, and 63.5%, respectively. APBI was used to treat 54.4%, 37.2%, 27.1%, and 23.7% of patients eligible by the ASTRO, GEC-ESTRO, ABS, and ASBS criteria, respectively. The ASTRO guideline exhibited the highest F1 score (0.76) and MCC (0.67), thus showing the best prediction of APBI utilization in Korea.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of Korean breast cancer patients who are candidates for APBI is substantial. The actual rate of APBI utilization among eligible patients may suggest there is a room for risk-stratified optimization in offering radiation therapy.

Cost-benefit ratio of modern medical education using micro-costing: a model calculation using the example of an innovative breast brachytherapy workshop

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiation oncology is an essential component of therapeutic oncology and necessitates well-trained personnel. Multicatheter brachytherapy (MCBT) is one radiotherapeutic option for early-stage breast cancer treatment. However, specialized hands-on training for MCBT is not currently included in the curriculum for residents. A recently developed hands-on brachytherapy workshop has demonstrated promising results in enhancing knowledge and practical skills. Nevertheless, these simulation-based teaching formats necessitate more time and financial resources. Our analyses include computational models for the implementation and delivery of this workshop and can serve as a basis for similar educational initiatives.

METHODS

This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of a previously developed and evaluated breast brachytherapy simulation workshop. Using a micro-costing approach, we estimated costs at a detailed level by considering supplies, soft- and hardware, and personnel time for each task. This method also allows for a comprehensive evaluation of the costs associated with implementing new medical techniques. The workshop costs were divided into two categories: development and workshop execution. The cost analysis was conducted on a per-participant basis, and the impact on knowledge improvement was measured using a questionnaire.

RESULTS

The total workshop costs were determined by considering the initial workshop setup expenses including the development and conceptualization of the course with all involved collaborators, as well as the costs incurred for each individual course. The workshop was found to be financially efficient, with a per-participant cost of € 39, considering the industrial sponsorship provided for brachytherapy equipment. In addition, we assessed the workshop's efficacy by analyzing participant feedback using Likert scale evaluations. The findings indicated a notable enhancement in both theoretical and practical skills among the participants. Moreover, the cost-to-benefit ratio (CBFR) analysis demonstrated a CBFR of € 13.53 for each Likert point increment.

CONCLUSION

The hands-on brachytherapy workshop proved to be a valuable and approximately cost-effective educational program, leading to a significant enhancement in the knowledge and skills of the participants. Without the support of industrial sponsorship, the costs would have been unattainable.

Intraoperative Radiation Therapy Delivered by Brachytherapy in Breast Cancer: An Interim Analysis of a Phase 2 Trial

PURPOSE

Intraoperative breast cancer radiotherapy (IORT) offers an alternative to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The Intraoperative brachytherapy (IOBT) trial applies high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy with a new applicator prototype as IORT after BCS. In this interim analysis of the IOBT trial, we present the oncological safety and toxicity of the method METHODS: Eligible patients were women, ≥ 50 years old with an unifocal nonlobular, estrogen-receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, cN0, ≤ 3 cm, treated with BCS and sentinel node biopsy (SNB). Toxicity was registered according to the LENT-SOMA scale. Cumulative incidence of local (LR) and regional recurrence (RR) were calculated through cumulative incidence function whereas overall survival (OS) was illustrated through Kaplan-Meier curve.

RESULTS

Until February 2023, 155 women (median age 68 years) were included in the trial. Twenty-nine women (18.7%) received supplemental EBRT, mostly due to positive SNB. Three-year cumulative incidence of LR and RR were 1.0% (CI 95 % 0.1%-2.3%) and 2.1% (CI 95% 0.8%-4.2%) respectively. Five- year cumulative incidence of LR and RR were 3.9% (CI 95% 1.8%-6.4%) and 2.1% (CI 95% 0.8%-4.2%) respectively. Five-year OS was 96.3% (CI 95% 93.6%-98.4%). Side effects were limited, low grade, and transient.

CONCLUSION

Acknowledging the short median follow-up time at interim analysis, our initial results indicate that delivering IORT through HDR brachytherapy in carefully selected breast cancer patients is feasible and oncological safe so far. A long-term follow-up is essential to confirm the initial results.

Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using 5 Daily Fractions: A Prospective, Phase 2, Multicenter Trial of Cosmetic Outcomes and Toxicity-ACCEL Final Results

PURPOSE

This study investigated the cosmetic degradation and toxicity for an accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) prescription delivered in 5 fractions over 1 week and compared the outcomes with those of whole breast irradiation (WBI).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The trial was a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 prospective cohort study. Eligible women 50 years of age or older with estrogen receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative invasive ductal carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ after breast-conserving surgery received 27 Gy in 5 daily fractions of APBI. The primary endpoint was noninferiority of 2-year cosmesis using the RAPID trial's WBI arm as the control arm. A global consensus cosmetic score using a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer rating scale score of excellent, good, fair, or poor for each patient at baseline and 2 years was generated by a panel of 5 radiation oncologists using photographs of treated and untreated breasts.

RESULTS

From 2016 to 2019, 298 eligible women were enrolled. By the 2-year follow-up, 76 patients had been lost or withdrawn and 3 had died, resulting in 219 patients available for complete, 2-year photographic cosmetic evaluation. The median follow-up for all participants was 4.7 years (IQR, 3.8-5.5 years). No patient had a fair or poor cosmetic score at the 2-year evaluation. Cosmesis was better or unchanged for 97% of patients and worse for 3% (excellent to good), and no cosmetic failures occurred. The confidence intervals were 0.88 (0.86-0.90) and 1.00 (0.99-1.00) for the RAPID and ACCEL trials, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cosmetic degradation with 5 daily treatments of the ACCEL trial's APBI intervention is noninferior to the WBI arm of the RAPID trial.

Ten-Year Results of Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation with Interstitial Multicatheter Brachytherapy after Breast-Conserving Surgery for Low-Risk Early Breast Cancer

Patients with an early carcinoma of the breast are commonly treated by breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and postoperative radiotherapy. Partial-breast irradiation has gained acceptance in the last few years. Between December 2008 and December 2017, 182 low-risk breast cancer patients treated by BCS in the four university hospitals of the province of Las Palmas and treated with APBI using interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy were included in this study. After a mean follow-up for survivors of 10 years, the treatment was shown to be safe, as no severe acute/late toxicity (grade ≥ 3) was observed. The 10-year IBTR was 1.7% (95%CI: 0.7-2.7%), and the cause-specific survival was 94.9% (95%CI: 93.2-96.6%). We suggest that multicatheter brachytherapy after BCS is safe and effective in early breast cancer patients.

Partial Breast Irradiation for Patients With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer or Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on appropriate indications and techniques for partial breast irradiation (PBI) for patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ.

METHODS

ASTRO convened a task force to address 4 key questions focused on the appropriate indications and techniques for PBI as an alternative to whole breast irradiation (WBI) to result in similar rates of ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) and toxicity outcomes. Also addressed were aspects related to the technical delivery of PBI, including dose-fractionation regimens, target volumes, and treatment parameters for different PBI techniques. The guideline is based on a systematic review provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Recommendations were created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength.

RESULTS

PBI delivered using 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity modulated radiation therapy, multicatheter brachytherapy, and single-entry brachytherapy results in similar IBR as WBI with long-term follow-up. Some patient characteristics and tumor features were underrepresented in the randomized controlled trials, making it difficult to fully define IBR risks for patients with these features. Appropriate dose-fractionation regimens, target volume delineation, and treatment planning parameters for delivery of PBI are outlined. Intraoperative radiation therapy alone is associated with a higher IBR rate compared with WBI. A daily or every-other-day external beam PBI regimen is preferred over twice-daily regimens due to late toxicity concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on published data, the ASTRO task force has proposed recommendations to inform best clinical practices on the use of PBI.

Review of brachytherapy clinical trials: a cross-sectional analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov

INTRODUCTION

Characterizing the landscape of clinical trials including brachytherapy can provide an overview of the current status and research trends which may guide further areas of investigation.

METHOD

We queried 449,849 clinical trials from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry using brachytherapy-related keywords from 1980 to 2023, yielding 245 multi-arm and 201 single-arm, brachytherapy trials. Multi-arm and single-arm brachytherapy trials were compared using 12 trial protocol elements.

RESULTS

The number of trials including brachytherapy has increased over time, with over 60% of trials registered in 2010 onwards. The majority of clinical trials were Phase 2 or 3, evaluated both safety and efficacy, and were funded by academic sponsors. The most common tumor sites evaluated in brachytherapy clinical trials include prostate, cervix, liver, endometrium, and breast.

CONCLUSION

There remains continued interest in clinical trials including brachytherapy focused on evaluation of novel delivery systems, treatment planning, and new indications. More brachytherapy clinical trials are needed to define the optimal clinical utilization and advance prospective research in this field.

Toxicity of external beam accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) in adjuvant therapy of early-stage breast cancer: prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an alternative breast-conserving therapy approach where radiation is delivered in less time compared to whole breast irradiation (WBI), resulting in improved patient convenience, less toxicity, and cost savings. This prospective randomized study compares the external beam APBI with commonly used moderate hypofractionated WBI in terms of feasibility, safety, tolerance, and cosmetic effects.

METHODS

Early breast cancer patients after partial mastectomy were equally randomized into two arms- external APBI and moderate hypofractionated WBI. External beam technique using available technical innovations commonly used in targeted hypofractionated radiotherapy to minimize irradiated volumes was used (cone beam computed tomography navigation to clips in the tumor bed, deep inspiration breath hold technique, volumetric modulated arc therapy dose application, using flattening filter free beams and the six degrees of freedom robotic treatment couch). Cosmetics results and toxicity were evaluated using questionnaires, CTCAE criteria, and photo documentation.

RESULTS

The analysis of 84 patients with a median age of 64 years showed significantly fewer acute adverse events in the APBI arm regarding skin reactions, local and general symptoms during a median follow-up of 37 months (range 21-45 months). A significant difference in favor of the APBI arm in grade ≥ 2 late skin toxicity was observed (p = 0.026). Late toxicity in the breast area (deformation, edema, fibrosis, and pain), affecting the quality of life and cosmetic effect, occurred in 61% and 17% of patients in WBI and APBI arms, respectively. The cosmetic effect was more favorable in the APBI arm, especially 6 to 12 months after the radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

External APBI demonstrated better feasibility and less toxicity than the standard regimen in the adjuvant setting for treating early breast cancer patients. The presented study confirmed the level of evidence for establishing the external APBI in daily clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT06007118.

Accelerated partial breast irradiation: Current evidence and future developments

Whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer has become one of the standard treatment modes for breast cancer and yields the same effect as radical surgery. Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) as a substitute for whole breast irradiation for patients with early breast cancer is a hot spot in clinical research. APBI is characterised by simple high-dose local irradiation of the tumour bed in a short time, thus improving convenience for patients and saving costs. The implementation methods of APBI mainly include brachytherapy, external beam radiation therapy, and intraoperative radiotherapy. This review provides an overview of the clinical effects and adverse reactions of the main technologies of APBI and discusses the prospects for the future development of APBI.

Survival analysis of palliative radiotherapy in patients with HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer

Background

Whether radiotherapy can improve the long-term survival of HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer remains unclear. We launched this study to explore the effect of HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer patients through anti-HER-2 targeted therapy + radiotherapy.

Methods

488 HER-2 + metastatic breast cancer patients who received anti-HER2 targeted ± local radiotherapy from March 2006 to September 2021 were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into a radiotherapy group (n=207) and a non-radiotherapy group (n=281) based on whether they received radiotherapy or not. 1: 1 propensity matching analysis was used to determine two groups of patients with similar baselines.

Results

Before matching, the radiotherapy group (n=207) had a median overall survival (mOS) of 51.7 months (48.8-63.8), which was superior to the non-radiotherapy group's (n=281) mOS of 33.9 months (27.9-39.9) (P < 0.0001). Moreover, the radiotherapy group exhibited better 1-year (94.6% vs 83.9%), 3-year (70.8% vs 45.5%), and 5-year (43.3% vs 25.0%) survival rates compared to the control group. Propensity score matching analysis identified 135 pairs of baseline-matched patients. In the matched groups, the mOS was 57.2 (44.5-69.8) months in the radiotherapy group (n=135) and 34.1 (27.5-40.6) months in the non-radiotherapy group (n=135), showing a statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001). Additionally, the radiotherapy group demonstrated 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 93.2%, 71.5%, and 46.9%, respectively, while those in the non-radiotherapy group were 89.4%, 45.8%, and 22.2%, respectively. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that the presence of brain metastasis, liver metastasis, and radiotherapy were identified as independent predictive factors significantly associated with OS.

Conclusion

In patients with HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer, radiotherapy was associated with better survival benefits compared to those who did not receive radiotherapy.

Comparison of partial-breast irradiation and intraoperative radiation to whole-breast irradiation in early-stage breast cancer patients: a Kaplan-Meier-derived patient data meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Partial breast irradiation (PBI) and intraoperative radiation (IORT) represent alternatives to whole breast irradiation (WBI) following breast conserving surgery. However, data is mixed regarding outcomes. We therefore performed a pooled analysis of Kaplan-Meier-derived patient data from randomized trials to evaluate the hypothesis that PBI and IORT have comparable long-term rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence as WBI.

METHODS

In February, 2023, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central were systematically searched for randomized phase 3 trials of early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery with PBI or IORT as compared to WBI. Time-to-event outcomes of interest included ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), overall survival (OS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS). Statistical analysis was performed with R Statistical Software.

RESULTS

Eleven randomized trials comprising 15,460 patients were included; 7,675 (49.6%) patients were treated with standard or moderately hypofractionated WBI, 5,413 (35%) with PBI and 2,372 (15.3%) with IORT. Median follow-up was 9 years. PBI demonstrated comparable IBTR risk compared with WBI (HR 1.20; 95% CI 0.95-1.52; p = 0.12) with no differences in OS (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.90-1.16; p = 0.70) or DDFS (HR 1.15; 95% CI 0.81-1.64; p = 0.43). In contrast, patients treated with IORT had a higher IBTR risk (HR 1.46; 95% CI 1.23-1.72; p < 0.01) compared with WBI with no difference in OS (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.84-1.14; p = 0.81) or DDFS (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.76-1.09; p = 0.31).

CONCLUSION

For patients with early-stage breast cancer following breast-conserving surgery, PBI demonstrated no difference in IBTR as compared to WBI while IORT was inferior to WBI with respect to IBTR.

Comparison of adverse events in partial- or whole breast radiotherapy: investigation of cosmesis, toxicities and quality of life in a meta-analysis of randomized trials

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

Adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy and systemic therapy are part of the current evidence-based treatment protocols for early breast cancer, after breast-conserving surgery. Numerous randomized trials have investigated the therapeutic effects of partial breast irradiation (PBI) compared to whole breast irradiation (WBI), limiting the treated breast tissue. These trials were designed to achieve equal control of the disease with possible reduction in adverse events, improvements in cosmesis and quality of life (QoL). In this meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate the differences between PBI and WBI in side effects and QoL.

MATERIAL/METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review searching for randomized trials comparing WBI and PBI in early-stage breast cancer with publication dates after 2009. The meta-analysis was performed using the published event rates and the effect-sizes for available acute and late adverse events. Additionally, we evaluated cosmetic outcomes as well as general and breast-specific QoL using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were identified (n = 19,085 patients). PBI was associated with a lower prevalence in any grade 1 + acute toxicity and grade 2 + skin toxicity (OR = 0.12; 95% CI 0.09-0.18; p < 0.001); (OR = 0.16; 95% CI 0.07-0.41; p < 0.001). There was neither a significant difference in late adverse events between the two treatments, nor in any unfavorable cosmetic outcomes, rated by either medical professionals or patients. PBI-technique using EBRT with twice-daily fractionation schedules resulted in worse cosmesis rated by patients (n = 3215; OR = 2.08; 95% CI 1.22-3.54; p = 0.007) compared to WBI. Maximum once-daily EBRT schedules (n = 2071; OR = 0.60; 95% CI 0.45-0.79; p < 0.001) and IORT (p = 0.042) resulted in better cosmetic results grade by medical professionals. Functional- and symptom-based QoL in the C30-scale was not different between PBI and WBI. Breast-specific QoL was superior after PBI in the subdomains of "systemic therapy side effects" as well as "breast-" and "arm symptoms".

CONCLUSION

The analysis of multiple randomized trials demonstrate a superiority of PBI in acute toxicity as well breast-specific quality of life, when compared with WBI. Overall, late toxicities and cosmetic results were similar. PBI-technique with a fractionation of twice-daily schedules resulted in worse cosmesis rated by patients.

[Adjuvant radiation therapy for breast cancer]

Adjuvant radiotherapy is an integral part of multimodal therapy for early breast cancer. It contributes to the reduction of local recurrences across all disease stages. (Moderate) hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation is the standard of care. In low-risk situations, partial breast irradiation can be an option. The indication for adjuvant radiotherapy after mastectomy or additional irradiation of regional lymph nodes depends on the patient's individual risk profile. Long-term results of treatment and further development of irradiation techniques now allow shorter, individualized and well-tolerated treatments with the aim of therapy de-escalation.

Whole Breast Irradiation in Comparison to Endocrine Therapy in Early Stage Breast Cancer-A Direct and Network Meta-Analysis of Published Randomized Trials

BACKGROUND

Multiple randomized trials have established adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) and whole breast irradiation (WBI) as the standard approach after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in early-stage breast cancer. The omission of WBI has been studied in multiple trials and resulted in reduced local control with maintained survival rates and has therefore been adapted as a treatment option in selected patients in several guidelines. Omitting ET instead of WBI might also be a valuable option as both treatments have distinctly different side effect profiles. However, the clinical outcomes of BCS + ET vs. BCS + WBI have not been formally analyzed.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review searching for randomized trials comparing BCS + ET vs. BCS + WBI in low-risk breast cancer patients with publication dates after 2000. We excluded trials using any form of chemotherapy, regional nodal radiation and mastectomy. The meta-analysis was performed using a two-step process. First, we extracted all available published event rates and the effect sizes for overall and breast-cancer-specific survival (OS, BCSS), local (LR) and regional recurrence, disease-free survival, distant metastases-free interval, contralateral breast cancer, second cancer other than breast cancer and mastectomy-free interval as investigated endpoints and compared them in a network meta-analysis. Second, the published individual patient data from the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) publications were used to allow a comparison of OS and BCSS.

RESULTS

We identified three studies, including a direct comparison of BCS + ET vs. BCS + WBI (n = 1059) and nine studies randomizing overall 7207 patients additionally to BCS only and BCS + WBI + ET resulting in a four-arm comparison. In the network analysis, LR was significantly lower in the BCS + WBI group in comparison with the BCS + ET group (HR = 0.62; CI-95%: 0.42-0.92; p = 0.019). We did not find any differences in OS (HR = 0.93; CI-95%: 0.53-1.62; p = 0.785) and BCSS (OR = 1.04; CI-95%: 0.45-2.41; p = 0.928). Further, we found a lower distant metastasis-free interval, a higher rate of contralateral breast cancer and a reduced mastectomy-free interval in the BCS + WBI-arm. Using the EBCTCG data, OS and BCSS were not significantly different between BCS + ET and BCS + WBI after 10 years (OS: OR = 0.85; CI-95%: 0.59-1.22; p = 0.369) (BCSS: OR = 0.72; CI-95%: 0.38-1.36; p = 0.305).

CONCLUSION

Evidence from direct and indirect comparison suggests that BCS + WBI might be an equivalent de-escalation strategy to BCS + ET in low-risk breast cancer. Adverse events and quality of life measures have to be further compared between these approaches.

Workflow optimization of brachytherapy-based very accelerated partial breast irradiation

PURPOSE

For low-risk breast cancer, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is a level 1 evidence procedure. Brachytherapy based very APBI (vAPBI) makes it possible to perform adjuvant irradiation in 4 to 1 fraction. However, vAPBI organization is critical. The aim of this technical note is to report on its optimization.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

To offer to low-risk breast cancer patient an efficient, simple, rapid adjuvant irradiation with a reduced number of hospital visits, a new organization of vAPBI based on a single fraction was established, merging all the different steps (from first consultation to irradiation) into a 4-5-consecutive-hour period. This therapeutic program was developed in strong collaboration with radiation oncologists, medical physicists, radiation therapists, and the medical secretary.

RESULTS

After the validation of adjuvant breast irradiation, the patient was offered a telemedicine consultation with the radiation oncologist. Then, the day of vAPBI, the patient arrived at the brachytherapy unit at 08:00 AM for an in-person consultation followed by a preimplant CT scan (defining catheter number and position). After breast local anesthesia, catheter placement was performed followed by a postimplant CT scan for planning purposes. A total dose of 16 Gy in 1 fraction was delivered before removing the catheters. The patient was discharged from the brachytherapy unit around 12:30 PM with an upcoming surveillance consultation date.

CONCLUSIONS

VAPBI organization optimization makes it possible to propose a short 5-h procedure from medical consultation to treatment with only one round trip. Strict organization among staff is required.

Three-Fraction Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) Delivered With Interstitial Brachytherapy Is Safe: First Results From the Tri-fraction Radiation Therapy Used to Minimize Patient Hospital Trips (TRIUMPH-T) Trial

PURPOSE

Shorter courses of breast radiotherapy are offered as an alternative to 4 weeks of whole-breast irradiation after lumpectomy, including brachytherapy. A prospective phase 2multi-institution clinical trial to study 3-fraction accelerated partial breast irradiation delivered by brachytherapy was conducted.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The trial treated selected breast cancers after breast-conserving surgery with brachytherapy applicators that delivered 22.5 Gy in 3 fractions of 7.5 Gy. The planning treatment volume was 1 to 2 cm beyond the surgical cavity. Eligible women were age ≥45 years with unicentric invasive or in situ tumors ≤3 cm excised with negative margins and with positive estrogen or progesterone receptors and no metastases to axillary nodes. Strict dosimetric parameters were required to be met and follow up information was collected from the participating sites.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients were prospectively enrolled; however, a total of 185 patients who were enrolled were followed for a median of 3.63 years. Three-fraction brachytherapy was associated with low chronic toxicity. There was excellent or good cosmesis in 94% of patients. There were no grade 4 toxicities. Grade 3 fibrosis at the treatment site was present in 1.7% and 32% percent had grades 1 or 2 fibrosis at the treatment site. There was 1 rib fracture. Other late toxicities included 7.4% grade 1 hyperpigmentation, 2% grade 1 telangiectasias, 1.7% symptomatic seromas, 1.7% abscessed cavities, and 1.1% symptomatic fat necrosis. There were 2 (1.1%) ipsilateral local recurrences, 2 (1.1%) nodal recurrences and no distant recurrences. Other incidents included one contralateral breast cancer and 2 second malignancies (lung).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultra-short breast brachytherapy is feasible and has excellent toxicity and could be an alternative to standard 5-day, 10 fraction accelerated partial breast irradiation in eligible patients. Patients from this prospective trial will continue to be followed to evaluate long-term outcomes.

Special issue. De-escalation of loco-regional treatment in breast cancer: Time to find the balance? Partial breast irradiation

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Over the past few decades, remarkable progress has been made in understanding the biology and pathology of breast cancer. A personalized conservative approach has been currently adopted addressing the patient's individual risk of relapse. After postoperative whole breast irradiation for early-stage breast cancer, a rate of recurrences outside the initial tumour bed lower than 4% was observed. Thus, the highest benefits of breast irradiation seem to result from the dose delivered to the tissue neighbouring the tumour bed. Nonetheless, reducing treatment morbidity while maintaining radiation therapy's ability to decrease local recurrences is an important challenge in treating patients with radiation therapy. In this regard, strategies such as partial-breast irradiation have been developed to reduce toxicity without compromising oncologic outcomes. According to the national and international published guidelines, clinical oncologists can refer to specific dose/fractionation schedules and eligible criteria. However, there are still some areas of open questions. Breast cancer represents a multidisciplinary paradigm; it should be considered a heterogeneous disease where a "one-treatment-fits-all" approach cannot be considered an appropriate option. This is a wide overview on the main partial breast irradiation advantages, risks, timings, techniques, and available recommendations. We aim to provide practical findings to support clinical decision-making, exploring future perspectives, towards a balance for optimisation of breast cancer.

A Single-Institution Retrospective Study of Three-Fraction HDR Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation

PURPOSE

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) delivered with high-dose-rate brachytherapy is a standard of care treatment typically delivered over 10 fractions. The TRIUMPH-T multi-institutional study recently demonstrated promising results using a shorter three fraction regimen, however there are limited additional published series using this regimen. Here, we report our experience and outcomes for patients treated as per the TRIUMPH-T regimen.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study was a retrospective single-institution analysis of patients who underwent lumpectomy followed by APBI (22.5 Gy in 3 fractions delivered over 2-3 days) using a Strut Adjusted Volume Implant (SAVI) applicator between November 2016 and January 2021. Dose-volume metrics were obtained from the clinically treated plan. Chart review was performed to determine locoregional recurrence and toxicities according to CTCAE v5.0.

RESULTS

Between 2016 and 2021, 31 patients were treated per the TRIUMPH-T protocol. Median followup was 31 months from completion of brachytherapy. There were no acute/late Grade 3 or higher toxicities. Cumulative late Grade 1 and 2 toxicities were seen in 58.1% and 9.7% of patients, respectively. Of note, four patients experienced locoregional recurrence: three ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences and one nodal recurrence. All three ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences occurred in patients who would be classified as "cautionary" based on ASTRO consensus guidelines due to age ≤50, lobular histology, or high grade.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-fraction HDR brachytherapy APBI was well-tolerated with no grade 3 or higher toxicities and an acceptably small percentage of grade 2 toxicities. Given the small sample size, the number of recurrences suggests that attention to appropriate patient selection is necessary until more long-term followup data is available.