Safety and efficacy of dual-lead thalamic deep brain stimulation for patients with treatment-refractory multiple sclerosis tremor: a single-centre, randomised, single-blind, pilot trial

Clinical neurophysiology in the treatment of movement disorders: IFCN handbook chapter

In this review, different aspects of the use of clinical neurophysiology techniques for the treatment of movement disorders are addressed. First of all, these techniques can be used to guide neuromodulation techniques or to perform therapeutic neuromodulation as such. Neuromodulation includes invasive techniques based on the surgical implantation of electrodes and a pulse generator, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) or spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on the one hand, and non-invasive techniques aimed at modulating or even lesioning neural structures by transcranial application. Movement disorders are one of the main areas of indication for the various neuromodulation techniques. This review focuses on the following techniques: DBS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation, including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and focused ultrasound (FUS), including high-intensity magnetic resonance-guided FUS (MRgFUS), and pulsed mode low-intensity transcranial FUS stimulation (TUS). The main clinical conditions in which neuromodulation has proven its efficacy are Parkinson's disease, dystonia, and essential tremor, mainly using DBS or MRgFUS. There is also some evidence for Tourette syndrome (DBS), Huntington's disease (DBS), cerebellar ataxia (tDCS), and axial signs (SCS) and depression (rTMS) in PD. The development of non-invasive transcranial neuromodulation techniques is limited by the short-term clinical impact of these techniques, especially rTMS, in the context of very chronic diseases. However, at-home use (tDCS) or current advances in the design of closed-loop stimulation (tACS) may open new perspectives for the application of these techniques in patients, favored by their easier use and lower rate of adverse effects compared to invasive or lesioning methods. Finally, this review summarizes the evidence for keeping the use of electromyography to optimize the identification of muscles to be treated with botulinum toxin injection, which is indicated and widely performed for the treatment of various movement disorders.

Management of essential tremor deep brain stimulation-induced side effects

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective surgical therapy for carefully selected patients with medication refractory essential tremor (ET). The most popular anatomical targets for ET DBS are the ventral intermedius nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus, the caudal zona incerta (cZI) and the posterior subthalamic area (PSA). Despite extensive knowledge in DBS programming for tremor suppression, it is not uncommon to experience stimulation induced side effects related to DBS therapy. Dysarthria, dysphagia, ataxia, and gait impairment are common stimulation induced side effects from modulation of brain tissue that surround the target of interest. In this review, we explore current evidence about the etiology of stimulation induced side effects in ET DBS and provide several evidence-based strategies to troubleshoot, reprogram and retain tremor suppression.

Patient selection and outcome of deep brain stimulation for multiple sclerosis-associated tremor

INTRODUCTION

Tremor is a disabling symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS), with limited treatment modalities. Thalamic ventral-intermediate-nucleus (VIM) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a method of neuromodulation. We describe the long-term outcomes of our carefully selected patients who underwent VIM DBS for their MS-associated tremor.

METHODS

Patients were referred from the regional neurology units. Pre-operative assessments included suitability for anesthesia, tremor quantification by the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin scores, and quality-of-life (EQ5D) measures. Exclusion criteria included prominent cerebellar symptoms such as ataxia and dysmetria, intracranial pathology such as ventriculomegaly, cerebellar plaques and thalamic abnormality, and comorbid psychiatric symptoms. Seven patients (3M:4F) underwent DBS for MS-associated tremor between September 2013 and February 2019. Mean age was 42 years (±SD 8 years). DBS was performed at a mean of 13 years (±SD 9 years) after diagnosis of MS.

RESULTS

There were no postoperative surgical complications. All patients showed improvement in FTM tremor scores, by up to 61% at 6 months postoperatively. There was an improvement of 30-175% in quality-of-life scores at 6 months. Improvement of tremor and quality of life, over baseline, was sustained over a long period of follow-up (mean 26.6 months ± SD 20.7 months), including our longest duration at 72 months.

CONCLUSION

With careful selection, DBS is a safe, efficacious intervention for MS-tremor and can positively impact on tremor and quality of life, with effects over a long period. As patients live longer with MS and the advent of new therapies, DBS should be considered for selected patients.

Recent advances in nanomaterials for neural applications: opportunities and challenges

Nanomedicines are promising for delivering drugs to the central nervous system, though their precision is still being improved. Fortifying nanoparticles with vital molecules can interact with the blood-brain barrier, enabling access to brain tissue. This study summarizes recent advances in nanomedicine to treat neurological complications. The integration of nanotechnology into cell biology aids in the study of brain cells' interactions. Magnetic microhydrogels have exhibited superior neuron activation compared with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles and hold promise for neuropsychiatric disorders. Nanomaterials have shown notable results, such as tackling neurodegenerative diseases by hindering harmful protein buildup and regulating cellular processes. However, further studies of the safety and effectiveness of nanoparticles in managing neurological diseases and disorders are still required.

Deep brain stimulation in multiple sclerosis-associated tremor. A large, retrospective, longitudinal open label study, with long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Tremor affects up to 25%-58% in multiple sclerosis (MS) population. Deep-brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral-intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus is considered as a potential option following medical treatments. Long term DBS efficacy is not well known in these patients with a poor outcome mostly related to disease progression.

OBJECTIVE

To report a large and retrospective study of thalamic DBS in MS tremor.

METHODS

We conducted a large and retrospective study of patients with MS disabling and pharmacologically resistant upper limb tremor, who underwent thalamic DBS procedure from January 1992 to January 2015 in University Hospital of Henri Mondor, France. Demographic data, clinical assessment and activity daily living were collected. A three-month and twelve-month post-operative assessment with clinical and functional rating scales have been achieved, as well as long term follow-up for most patients.

RESULTS

One hundred and four patients underwent DBS procedure. There were 71 female (68%) and 33 male (32%). At three-month post-operative assessment, 64% patients were improved clinically and functionally. Among these, 93% of patients kept a good efficacy at one-year post-operative assessment. Mean duration of follow-up for these patients was 6 years.

CONCLUSION

We described a long-term sustained clinical and functional improvement in this large and retrospective report of thalamic DBS. This neuromodulation approach could be a therapeutic option for all severe upper extremity refractory tremor in MS patients.

Neuronal activity and remyelination: new insights into the molecular mechanisms and therapeutic advancements

This article reviews the role of neuronal activity in myelin regeneration and the related neural signaling pathways. The article points out that neuronal activity can stimulate the formation and regeneration of myelin, significantly improve its conduction speed and neural signal processing ability, maintain axonal integrity, and support axonal nutrition. However, myelin damage is common in various clinical diseases such as multiple sclerosis, stroke, dementia, and schizophrenia. Although myelin regeneration exists in these diseases, it is often incomplete and cannot promote functional recovery. Therefore, seeking other ways to improve myelin regeneration in clinical trials in recent years is of great significance. Research has shown that controlling neuronal excitability may become a new intervention method for the clinical treatment of demyelinating diseases. The article discusses the latest research progress of neuronal activity on myelin regeneration, including direct or indirect stimulation methods, and the related neural signaling pathways, including glutamatergic, GABAergic, cholinergic, histaminergic, purinergic and voltage-gated ion channel signaling pathways, revealing that seeking treatment strategies to promote myelin regeneration through precise regulation of neuronal activity has broad prospects.

Surgical Site Infections Associated With Implanted Pulse Generators for Deep Brain Stimulation: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify and systematically analyze relevant literature on surgical site infections (SSIs) associated with implantable pulse generator (IPG) procedures for deep brain stimulation (DBS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses of 58 studies that reported SSI rates of 11,289 patients and 15,956 IPG procedures. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed to estimate the pooled proportion of SSIs across DBS procedures in general and to estimate the proportion of SSIs that occur at the IPG pocket. Moreover, a meta-analysis of odds ratio (OR) was conducted on those studies that reported their results of applying topical vancomycin powder during closure of the IPG wound. Results are presented as rates and OR with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

The pooled proportion of SSIs was 4.9% (95% CI, 4.1%-6.1%) among all DBS procedures. The dominant SSI localization was the IPG pocket in 61.2% (95% CI, 53.4%-68.5%). A trend toward a beneficial effect of vancomycin powder over standard wound closure was found with an OR of 0.46 (95% CI, 0.21-1.02). Most studies (79.1%) that reported their treatment strategy in case of SSI had a strict protocol of removal of the IPG, followed by antimicrobial treatment and reimplantation of the IPG once the SSI had been eradicated.

CONCLUSIONS

The IPG pocket was identified as the main site of SSI after DBS procedures. Most studies recommend complete IPG removal, antimicrobial treatment, and reimplantation of an IPG once the SSI has been eradicated. Future studies are needed to clarify the role of alternative approaches (eg, topical vancomycin powder) in the prevention of SSI associated with IPG.

Preventing incubation of drug craving to treat drug relapse: from bench to bedside

In 1986, Gawin and Kleber reported a progressive increase in cue-induced drug craving in individuals with cocaine use disorders during prolonged abstinence. After years of controversy, as of 2001, this phenomenon was confirmed in rodent studies using self-administration model, and defined as the incubation of drug craving. The intensification of cue-induced drug craving after withdrawal exposes abstinent individuals to a high risk of relapse, which urged us to develop effective interventions to prevent incubated craving. Substantial achievements have been made in deciphering the neural mechanisms, with potential implications for reducing drug craving and preventing the relapse. The present review discusses promising drug targets that have been well investigated in animal studies, including some neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, neurotrophic factors, and epigenetic markers. We also discuss translational exploitation and challenges in the field of the incubation of drug craving, providing insights into future investigations and highlighting the potential of pharmacological interventions, environment-based interventions, and neuromodulation techniques.

A case report: Dual-lead deep brain stimulation of the posterior subthalamic area and the thalamus was effective for Holmes tremor after unsuccessful focused ultrasound thalamotomy

Holmes tremor is a symptomatic tremor that develops secondary to central nervous system disorders. Stereotactic neuromodulation is considered when the tremors are intractable. Targeting the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) is common; however, the outcome is often unsatisfactory, and the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) is expected as alternative target. In this study, we report the case of a patient with intractable Holmes tremor who underwent dual-lead deep brain stimulation (DBS) to stimulate multiple locations in the PSA and thalamus. The patient was a 77-year-old female who complained of severe tremor in her left upper extremity that developed one year after her right thalamic infarction. Vim-thalamotomy using focused ultrasound therapy (FUS) was initially performed but failed to control tremor. Subsequently, we performed DBS using two leads to stimulate four different structures. Accordingly, one lead was implanted with the aim of targeting the ventral oralis nucleus (Vo)/zona incerta (Zi), and the other with the aim of targeting the Vim/prelemniscal radiation (Raprl). Electrode stimulation revealed that Raprl and Zi had obvious effects. Postoperatively, the patient achieved good tremor control without any side effects, which was maintained for two years. Considering that she demonstrated resting, postural, and intention/action tremor, and Vim-thalamotomy by FUS was insufficient for tremor control, complicated pathogenesis was presumed in her symptoms including both the cerebellothalamic and the pallidothalamic pathways. Using the dual-lead DBS technique, we have more choices to adjust the stimulation at multiple sites, where different functional networks are connected. Intractable tremors, such as Holmes tremor, may have complicated pathology, therefore, modulating multiple pathological networks is necessary. We suggest that the dual-lead DBS (Vo/Raprl and Vim/Zi) presented here is safe, technically feasible, and possibly effective for the control of Holmes tremor.

Deep brain stimulation of the posterior subthalamic area as an alternative strategy for management of Holmes tremor: A case report and review of the literature

Background:

Holmes tremor is often refractory to medical treatment and deep brain stimulation of the ventralis intermedius nucleus of the thalamus (VIM-DBS) is the intervention of choice in controlling the tremor. Herein, we present a beneficial alternative strategy for the management of such situations, considering the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) as the target of stimulation.

Case Description:

We report a 57-year-old male with the right-sided tremor following a traumatic brain injury 20 years ago. He had been diagnosed with Holmes tremor that was not responsive to nonsurgical therapeutic options. When refractoriness confirmed, he became a candidate for VIM-DBS. During the operation, by performing macrostimulation with a maximum of 2 mA of amplitude, the tremor had no response to the stimulation of different tracts, and severe right hemi-body paresthesia occurred; therefore, we modified our approach and targeted the PSA, which resulted in satisfactory control of the tremor. The permanent lead was implanted into the left side PSA. At 1-year follow-up, the right side tremor was under complete control.

Conclusion:

Our case and other similar pieces of evidence are consistently indicating the potential regulatory effects of PSA-DBS in controlling the Holmes tremor as a feasible alternative strategy when VIM-DBS does not provide a satisfactory response. However, further studies with larger sample size are required to evaluate the long-term response and its possible long-term stimulation-related effects.

Advances in DBS Technology and Novel Applications: Focus on Movement Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment in several movement disorders, including Parkinson's disease, dystonia, tremor, and Tourette syndrome. In this review, we will review and discuss the most recent findings including but not limited to clinical evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

New DBS technologies include novel hardware design (electrodes, cables, implanted pulse generators) enabling new stimulation patterns and adaptive DBS which delivers potential stimulation tailored to moment-to-moment changes in the patient's condition. Better understanding of movement disorders pathophysiology and functional anatomy has been pivotal for studying the effects of DBS on the mesencephalic locomotor region, the nucleus basalis of Meynert, the substantia nigra, and the spinal cord. Eventually, neurosurgical practice has improved with more accurate target visualization or combined targeting. A rising research domain emphasizes bridging neuromodulation and neuroprotection. Recent advances in DBS therapy bring more possibilities to effectively treat people with movement disorders. Future research would focus on improving adaptive DBS, leading more clinical trials on novel targets, and exploring neuromodulation effects on neuroprotection.

Initial Clinical Outcome With Bilateral, Dual-Target Deep Brain Stimulation Trial in Parkinson Disease Using Summit RC + S

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy in advanced Parkinson disease (PD). Although both subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus (GP) DBS show equivalent efficacy in PD, combined stimulation may demonstrate synergism.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical benefit of stimulating a combination of STN and GP DBS leads and to demonstrate biomarker discovery for adaptive DBS therapy in an observational study.

METHODS

We performed a pilot trial (n = 3) of implanting bilateral STN and GP DBS leads, connected to a bidirectional implantable pulse generator (Medtronic Summit RC + S; NCT03815656, IDE No. G180280). Initial 1-year outcome in 3 patients included Unified PD Rating Scale on and off medications, medication dosage, Hauser diary, and recorded beta frequency spectral power.

RESULTS

Combined DBS improved PD symptom control, allowing >80% levodopa medication reduction. There was a greater decrease in off-medication motor Unified PD Rating Scale with multiple electrodes activated (mean difference from off stimulation off medications -18.2, range -25.5 to -12.5) than either STN (-12.8, range -20.5 to 0) or GP alone (-9, range -11.5 to -4.5). Combined DBS resulted in a greater reduction of beta oscillations in STN in 5/6 hemispheres than either site alone. Adverse events occurred in 2 patients, including a small cortical hemorrhage and seizure at 24 hours postoperatively, which resolved spontaneously, and extension wire scarring requiring revision at 2 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with PD preferred combined DBS stimulation in this preliminary cohort. Future studies will address efficacy of adaptive DBS as we further define biomarkers and control policy.

Movement Disorders in Multiple Sclerosis: An Update

Background:

Multiple sclerosis (MS), a subset of chronic primary inflammatory demyelinating disorders of the central nervous system, is closely associated with various movement disorders. These disorders may be due to MS pathophysiology or be coincidental. This review describes the full spectrum of movement disorders in MS with their possible mechanistic pathways and therapeutic modalities.

Methods:

The authors conducted a narrative literature review by searching for ‘multiple sclerosis’ and the specific movement disorder on PubMed until October 2021. Relevant articles were screened, selected, and included in the review according to groups of movement disorders.

Results:

The most prevalent movement disorders described in MS include restless leg syndrome, tremor, ataxia, parkinsonism, paroxysmal dyskinesias, chorea and ballism, facial myokymia, including hemifacial spasm and spastic paretic hemifacial contracture, tics, and tourettism. The anatomical basis of some of these disorders is poorly understood; however, the link between them and MS is supported by clinical and neuroimaging evidence. Treatment options are disorder-specific and often multidisciplinary, including pharmacological, surgical, and physical therapies.

Discussion:

Movements disorders in MS involve multiple pathophysiological processes and anatomical pathways. Since these disorders can be the presenting symptoms, they may aid in early diagnosis and managing the patient, including monitoring disease progression. Treatment of these disorders is a challenge. Further work needs to be done to understand the prevalence and the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for movement disorders in MS.

Connectomic analysis of unilateral dual lead thalamic deep brain stimulation for treatment of multiple sclerosis tremor

Tremor is a common symptom in multiple sclerosis and can present as a severe postural and action tremor, leading to significant disability. Owing to the diffuse and progressive nature of the disease, it has been challenging to characterize the pathophysiology underlying multiple sclerosis tremor. Deep brain stimulation of the ventralis intermedius and the ventralis oralis posterior thalamic nuclei has been used to treat medically refractory multiple sclerosis tremors with variable results. The aim of this study was to characterize multiple sclerosis tremor at the network level by applying modern connectomic techniques to data from a previously completed single-centre, randomized, single-blind prospective trial of 12 subjects who were treated with unilateral dual-lead (ventralis intermedius + ventralis oralis posterior) thalamic deep brain stimulation. Preoperative T₁-weighted MRI and postoperative head CTs were used, along with applied programming settings, to estimate the volume of tissue activated for each patient. The volumes of tissue activated were then used to make voxel-wise and structural connectivity correlations with clinically observed tremor suppression. The volume of the tissue-activated analyses identified the optimal region of stimulation at the ventralis oralis posterior ventralis intermedius border intersecting with the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract. A regression model showed strong connectivity to the supplemental motor area was positively associated with tremor suppression (r = 0.66) in this cohort, whereas connectivity to the primary motor cortex was negatively associated with tremor suppression (r = −0.69), a finding opposite to that seen in ventralis intermedius deep brain stimulation for essential tremor. Comparing the structural connectivity to that of an essential tremor cohort revealed a distinct network that lies anterior to the essential tremor network. Overall, the volumes of tissue activated and connectivity observations converge to suggest that optimal suppression of multiple sclerosis tremor will likely be achieved by directing stimulation more anteriorly toward the ventralis oralis posterior and that a wide field of stimulation synergistically modulating the ventralis oralis posterior and ventralis intermedius nuclei may be more effective than traditional ventralis intermedius deep brain stimulation at suppressing the severe tremors commonly seen in complex tremor syndromes such as multiple sclerosis tremor.

Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation on Cerebellar Tremor Compared to Non-Cerebellar Tremor Using a Wearable Device in a Patient With Multiple Sclerosis: Case Report

Tremor of the upper extremity is a significant cause of disability in some patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The MS tremor is complex because it contains an ataxic intentional tremor component due to the involvement of the cerebellum and cerebellar outflow pathways by MS plaques, which makes the MS tremor, in general, less responsive to medications or deep brain stimulation (DBS) than those associated with essential tremor or Parkinson's disease. The cerebellar component has been thought to be the main reason for making DBS less effective, although it is not clear whether it is due to the lack of suppression of the ataxic tremor by DBS or else. The goal of this study was to clarify the effect of DBS on cerebellar tremor compared to non-cerebellar tremor in a patient with MS. By wearing an accelerometer on the index finger of each hand, we were able to quantitatively characterize kinetic tremor by frequency and amplitude, with cerebellar ataxia component on one hand and that without cerebellar component on the other hand, at the beginning and end of the hand movement approaching a target at DBS Off and On status. We found that cerebellar tremor surprisingly had as good a response to DBS as the tremor without a cerebellar component, but the function control on cerebellar tremor was not as good due to its distal oscillation, which made the amplitude of tremor increasingly greater as it approached the target. This explains why cerebellar tremor or MS tremor with cerebellar component has a poor functional transformation even with a good percentage of tremor control. This case study provides a better understanding of the effect of DBS on cerebellar tremor and MS tremor by using a wearable device, which could help future studies improve patient selection and outcome prediction for DBS treatment of this disabling tremor.

Habituation After Deep Brain Stimulation in Tremor Syndromes: Prevalence, Risk Factors and Long-Term Outcomes

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamus is an effective treatment for medically refractory essential, dystonic and Parkinson's tremor. It may also provide benefit in less common tremor syndromes including, post-traumatic, cerebellar, Holmes, neuropathic and orthostatic tremor. The long-term benefit of DBS in essential and dystonic tremor (ET/DT) often wanes over time, a phenomena referred to as stimulation “tolerance” or “habituation”. While habituation is generally accepted to exist, it remains controversial. Attempts to quantify habituation have revealed conflicting reports. Placebo effects, loss of micro-lesional effect, disease related progression, suboptimal stimulation and stimulation related side-effects may all contribute to the loss of sustained long-term therapeutic effect. Habituation often presents as substantial loss of initial DBS benefit occurring as early as a few months after initial stimulation; a complex and feared issue when faced in the setting of optimal electrode placement. Simply increasing stimulation current tends only to propagate tremor severity and induce stimulation related side effects. The report by Paschen and colleagues of worsening tremor scores in the “On” vs. “Off” stimulation state over time, even after accounting for “rebound” tremor, supports the concept of habituation. However, these findings have not been consistent across all studies. Chronic high intensity stimulation has been hypothesized to induce detrimental plastic effects on tremor networks, with some lines of evidence that DT and ET may be more susceptible than Parkinson's tremor to habituation. However, Tsuboi and colleague's recent longitudinal follow-up in dystonic and “pure” essential tremor suggests otherwise. Alternatively, post-mortem findings support a biological adaption to stimulation. The prevalence and etiology of habituation is still not fully understood and management remains difficult. A recent study reported that alternating thalamic stimulation parameters at weekly intervals provided improved stability of tremor control consistent with reduced habituation. In this article the available evidence for habituation after DBS for tremor syndromes is reviewed; including its prevalence, time-course, possible mechanisms; along with expected long-term outcomes for tremor and factors that may assist in predicting, preventing and managing habituation.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor and Dystonia

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the most commonly used surgical treatment for drug-refractory movement disorders such as tremor and dystonia. Appropriate patient selection along with target selection is important to ensure optimal outcome without complications. This review summarizes the recent literature regarding the mechanism of action, indications, outcome, and complications of DBS in tremor and dystonia. A comparison with other modalities of surgical interventions is discussed along with a note of the recent advances in technology. Future research needs to be directed to understand the underlying etiopathogenesis of the disease and the way in which DBS modulates the intracranial abnormal networks.

A novel diagnostic marker for progressive supranuclear palsy targeting atrophy of the subthalamic nucleus

INTRODUCTION

Despite great progress in radiological diagnostic tools for neurodegenerative disorders, their diagnostic accuracy has been unsatisfactory. One of the pathological hallmarks of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is atrophy of the subthalamic nucleus, which has not attracted much attention for imaging analysis.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with PSP, multiple system atrophy (MSA), Parkinson's disease (PD), and corticobasal syndrome (CBS) who underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging at our department between June 2019 and March 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The volumes of the subthalamic nucleus and of the whole cerebrum were then analyzed and compared among the disorders.

RESULTS

Fourteen PSP-Richardson syndrome (RS), 14 MSA, 14 PD, and 8 CBS patients were assessed. The mean volume of the bilateral subthalamic nuclei was smaller in PSP patients (0.148 ± 0.012 cm³) than in MSA (0.183 ± 0.026 cm³; p < 0.001), PD (0.209 ± 0.031 cm³; p < 0.001), and CBS (0.180 ± 0.056 cm³; p < 0.001) patients. The volume of the whole cerebrum was not significantly different among the disorders. Using an STN volume cut-off of 0.01925, the sensitivity and specificity for differential diagnosis between PSP and the other disorders were 0.846 and 0.972, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Subthalamic nucleus volume may be a useful diagnostic marker for PSP; it may easily differentiate it from other neurodegenerative parkinsonian disorders.

Therapeutic potential of neuromodulation for demyelinating diseases

Neuromodulation represents a cutting edge class of both invasive and non-invasive therapeutic methods which alter the activity of neurons. Currently, several different techniques have been developed - or are currently being investigated – to treat a wide variety of neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. Recently, in vivo and in vitro studies have revealed that neuromodulation can also induce myelination, meaning that it could hold potential as a therapy for various demyelinating diseases including multiple sclerosis and progressive multifocal leukencepalopathy. These findings come on the heels of a paradigm shift in the view of myelin’s role within the nervous system from a static structure to an active co-regulator of central nervous system plasticity and participant in neuron-mediated modulation. In the present review, we highlight several of the recent findings regarding the role of neural activity in altering myelination including several soluble and contact-dependent factors that seem to mediate neural activity-dependent myelination. We also highlight several considerations for neuromodulatory techniques, including the need for further research into spatiotemporal precision, dosage, and the safety and efficacy of transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation, an emerging neuromodulation technology. As the field of neuromodulation continues to evolve, it could potentially bring forth methods for the treatment of demyelinating diseases, and as such, further investigation into the mechanisms of neuron-dependent myelination as well as neuro-imaging modalities that can monitor myelination activity is warranted.

Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Isolated Dystonia: Stereotactic Accuracy, Efficacy, and Safety

OBJECTIVES

Lead placement for deep brain stimulation (DBS) is routinely performed using neuroimaging or microelectrode recording (MER). Recent studies have demonstrated that DBS under general anesthesia using an imaging-guided target technique ("asleep" DBS) can be performed accurately and effectively with lower surgery complication rates than the MER-guided target method under local anesthesia ("awake" DBS). This suggests that asleep DBS may be a more acceptable method. However, there is limited direct evidence focused on isolated dystonia using this method. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes and targeting accuracy in patients with dystonia who underwent asleep DBS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined 56 patients (112 leads) with isolated dystonia who underwent asleep DBS targeting in the globus pallidus internus (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN). The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) scores were assessed preoperatively and at 12-month follow-up (12 m-FU). The lead accuracy was evaluated by comparing the coordinates of the preoperative plan with those of the final electrode implantation location. Other measures analyzed included stimulation parameters and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

For both GPi and STN cohorts, mean BFMDRS motor scores were significantly lower at 12 m-FU (8.9 ± 10.9 and 4.6 ± 5.7 points) than at baseline (22.6 ± 16.4 and 16.1 ± 14.1 points, p < 0.001). The mean difference between the planned target and the distal contact of the leads was 1.33 ± 0.54 mm for the right brain electrodes and 1.50 ± 0.57 mm for the left, determined by Euclidian distance. No perioperative complications or AEs related to the device were observed during the complete follow-up. However, AEs associated with stimulation occurred in 12 and 6 patients in the GPi and STN groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Asleep DBS may be an accurate, effective, and safe method for treating patients with isolated dystonia regardless of the stimulation target.

Deep-Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor and Other Tremor Syndromes: A Narrative Review of Current Targets and Clinical Outcomes

Tremor is a prevalent symptom associated with multiple conditions, including essential tremor (ET), Parkinson's disease (PD), multiple sclerosis (MS), stroke and trauma. The surgical management of tremor evolved from stereotactic lesions to deep-brain stimulation (DBS), which allowed safe and reversible interference with specific neural networks. This paper reviews the current literature on DBS for tremor, starting with a detailed discussion of current tremor targets (ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (Vim), prelemniscal radiations (Raprl), caudal zona incerta (Zi), thalamus (Vo) and subthalamic nucleus (STN)) and continuing with a discussion of results obtained when performing DBS in the various aforementioned tremor syndromes. Future directions for DBS research are then briefly discussed.

Therapeutic Advances in the Treatment of Holmes Tremor: Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to formulate a practical clinical treatment algorithm for Holmes's tremor (HT) by reviewing currently published clinical data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic review of articles discussing the management of HT published between January 1990 and December 2018. We examined data from 89 patients published across 58 studies detailing the effects of pharmacological or surgical interventions on HT severity. Clinical outcomes were measured by a continuous 1-10 ranked scale. The majority of studies addressing treatment response were case series or case reports. No randomized control studies were identified.

RESULTS

Our review included 24 studies focusing on pharmacologic treatments of 25 HT patients and 34 studies focusing on the effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in 64 patients. In the medical intervention group, the most commonly used drugs were levetiracetam, trihexyphenidyl, and levodopa. In the surgically treated group, the thalamic ventralis intermedius nucleus (VIM) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) were the most common brain targets for neuromodulation. The two targets accounted for 57.8% and 32.8% of total cases, respectively. Overall, compared to the medically treated group, DBS provided greater tremor suppression (p = 0.025) and was more effective for the management of postural tremor in HT. Moreover, GPi DBS displayed greater benefit in the resting tremor component (p = 0.042) and overall tremor reduction (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a highly variable response to different medical treatments in HT without randomized clinical trials available to dictate treatment decisions. A variety of medical and surgical treatment options can be considered for the management of HT. Collaborative reseach between different institutions and researchers are warranted and needed to improve our understanding of the pathophysiology and management of this condition. In this review, we propose a practical treatment algorithm for HT based on currently available evidence.

Activation robustness with directional leads and multi-lead configurations in deep brain stimulation

OBJECTIVE

Clinical outcomes from deep brain stimulation (DBS) can be highly variable, and two critical factors underlying this variability are the location and type of stimulation. In this study we quantified how robustly DBS activates a target region when taking into account a range of different lead designs and realistic variations in placement. The objective of the study is to assess the likelihood of achieving target activation.

APPROACH

We performed finite element computational modeling and established a metric of performance robustness to evaluate the ability of directional and multi-lead configurations to activate target fiber pathways while taking into account location variability. A more robust lead configuration produces less variability in activation across all stimulation locations around the target.

MAIN RESULTS

Directional leads demonstrated higher overall performance robustness compared to axisymmetric leads, primarily 1-2 mm outside of the target. Multi-lead configurations demonstrated higher levels of robustness compared to any single lead due to distribution of electrodes in a broader region around the target.

SIGNIFICANCE

Robustness measures can be used to evaluate the performance of existing DBS lead designs and aid in the development of novel lead designs to better accommodate known variability in lead location and orientation. This type of analysis may also be useful to understand how DBS clinical outcome variability is influenced by lead location among groups of patients.

Deep brain stimulation in essential tremor: targets, technology, and a comprehensive review of clinical outcomes

Introduction: Essential tremor (ET) is a common movement disorder with an estimated prevalence of 0.9% worldwide. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for medication refractory and debilitating tremor. With the arrival of next generation technology, the implementation and delivery of DBS has been rapidly evolving. This review will highlight the current applications and constraints for DBS in ET.Areas covered: The mechanism of action, targets for neuromodulation, next generation guidance techniques, symptom-specific applications, and long-term efficacy will be reviewed.Expert opinion: The posterior subthalamic area and zona incerta are alternative targets to thalamic DBS in ET. However, they may be associated with additional stimulation-induced side effects. Novel stimulation paradigms and segmented electrodes provide innovative approaches to DBS programming and stimulation-induced side effects.

Deep brain stimulation: current challenges and future directions

The clinical use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) is among the most important advances in the clinical neurosciences in the past two decades. As a surgical tool, DBS can directly measure pathological brain activity and can deliver adjustable stimulation for therapeutic effect in neurological and psychiatric disorders correlated with dysfunctional circuitry. The development of DBS has opened new opportunities to access and interrogate malfunctioning brain circuits and to test the therapeutic potential of regulating the output of these circuits in a broad range of disorders. Despite the success and rapid adoption of DBS, crucial questions remain, including which brain areas should be targeted and in which patients. This Review considers how DBS has facilitated advances in our understanding of how circuit malfunction can lead to brain disorders and outlines the key unmet challenges and future directions in the DBS field. Determining the next steps in DBS science will help to define the future role of this technology in the development of novel therapeutics for the most challenging disorders affecting the human brain.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Multiple Sclerosis Tremor: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on multiple sclerosis (MS)-tremor, as measured by a normalized scale of tremor severity, with a meta-analysis of the published literature.

METHODS

Medline and EBSCO Host (January, 1998 to June, 2018) were systematically reviewed with librarian guidance, using the keywords "Deep brain stimulation" and "multiple sclerosis." Bibliographies and experts in the field were also consulted to identify missed articles. All therapeutic studies on DBS for MS-tremor, reported in the English language, within the study period were included. Papers that reported outcomes without a measure of central tendency and/or distribution were excluded. The papers were read in their entirety and graded for risk of bias according to the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) standards. To maximize statistical power, papers using different stimulation targets were grouped together. Outcomes were reported with the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin scale (FTM), the Bain-Finchley scale (CRS) and 3- and 4-point tremor severity scales and normalized with a Hedges g.

RESULTS

The search produced 13 studies suitable for meta-analysis. The random-effects meta-analysis showed that DBS improved the Hedges standardized mean tremor score by 2.86 (95%CI 2.03-3.70, p < .00001). Heterogeneity was high, with an I² of 84%, suggesting that random effects model is more appropriate. Adverse event rates varied from 8% to 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides level III evidence that DBS may improve MS-related tremor as measured by standardized tremor severity scales.

Mapping holmes tremor circuit using the human brain connectome

OBJECTIVE

Holmes tremor is a debilitating movement disorder with limited treatment options. Lesions causing Holmes tremor can occur in multiple different brain locations, leaving the neuroanatomical substrate unclear. Here, we test whether lesion locations that cause Holmes tremor map to a connected brain circuit and whether this circuit might serve as a useful therapeutic target.

METHODS

Case reports of Holmes tremor caused by focal brain lesions were identified through a systematic literature search. Connectivity between each lesion location and the rest of the brain was computed using resting state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging data from 1,000 healthy volunteers. Commonalities across lesion locations were identified. This Holmes tremor circuit was then compared to neurosurgical treatment targets and clinical efficacy.

RESULTS

We identified 36 lesions causing Holmes tremor, which were scattered across multiple different brain regions. However, all lesion locations were connected to a common brain circuit with nodes in the red nucleus, thalamus, globus pallidus, and cerebellum. In cases with effective neurosurgical treatment, the treatment target was connected with the lesion location, indicating that a second hit to the same circuit might be beneficial. Commonly used deep brain stimulation targets such as the ventral intermediate nucleus and subthalamic nucleus fell outside our Holmes tremor circuit, whereas the globus pallidus target was close, consistent with published clinical response rates for these targets.

INTERPRETATION

Lesions causing Holmes tremor are part of a single connected brain circuit that may serve as an improved therapeutic target. ANN NEUROL 2019;86:812-820.

Focused ultrasound thalamotomy for multiple sclerosis-associated tremor

Multiple sclerosis (MS)-related tremor is frequent and can often be refractory to medical treatment, which makes it a potential source of major disability. Functional neurosurgery approaches such as thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) or radiofrequency thalamotomy are proven to be effective, but the application of invasive techniques in MS tremor has so far been limited. Magnetic resonance (MR)-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy, which has already been approved for treating essential and parkinsonian tremor, provides a minimally invasive approach that could be useful in the management of MS tremor. We report for the first time a patient with medically refractory MS-associated tremor successfully treated by focused ultrasound thalamotomy.

Tremor habituation to deep brain stimulation: Underlying mechanisms and solutions

DBS of the ventral intermediate nucleus is an extremely effective treatment for essential tremor, although a waning benefit is observed after a variable time in a variable proportion of patients (ranging from 0% to 73%), a concept historically defined as "tolerance." Tolerance is currently an established concept in the medical community, although there is debate on its real existence. In fact, very few publications have actually addressed the problem, thus making tolerance a typical example of science based on "eminence rather than evidence." The underpinnings of the phenomena associated with the progressive loss of DBS benefit are not fully elucidated, although the interplay of different-not mutually exclusive-factors has been advocated. In this viewpoint, we gathered the evidence explaining the progressive loss of benefit observed after DBS. We grouped these factors in three categories: disease-related factors (tremor etiology and progression); surgery-related factors (electrode location, microlesional effect and placebo); and stimulation-related factors (not optimized stimulation, stimulation-induced side effects, habituation, and tremor rebound). We also propose possible pathophysiological explanations for the phenomenon and define a nomenclature of the associated features: early versus late DBS failure; tremor rebound versus habituation (to be preferred over tolerance). Finally, we provide a practical approach for preventing and treating this loss of DBS benefit, and we draft a possible roadmap for the research to come. © 2019 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Comparison of posterior subthalamic area deep brain stimulation for tremor using conventional landmarks versus directly targeting the dentatorubrothalamic tract with tractography

OBJECTIVE

To compare posterior subthalamic area deep brain stimulation (PSA-DBS) performed in the conventional manner against diffusion tensor imaging and tractography (DTIT)-guided lead implantation into the dentatorubrothalamic tract (DRTT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Double-blind, randomised study involving 34 patients with either tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease or essential tremor. Patients were randomised to Group A (DBS leads inserted using conventional landmarks) or Group B (leads guided into the DRTT using DTIT). Tremor (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin) and quality-of-life (PDQ-39) scores were evaluated 0-, 6-, 12-, 36- and 60-months after surgery.

RESULTS

PSA-DBS resulted in marked tremor reduction in both groups. However, Group B patients had significantly better arm tremor control (especially control of intention tremor), increased mobility and activities of daily living, reduced social stigma and need for social support as well as lower stimulation amplitudes and pulse widths compared to Group A patients. The better outcomes were sustained for up to 60-months from surgery. The active contacts of Group B patients were consistently closer to the centre of the DRTT than in Group A. Speech problems were more common in Group A patients.

CONCLUSION

DTIT-guided lead placement results in better and more stable tremor control and fewer adverse effects compared to lead placement in the conventional manner. This is because DTIT-guidance allows closer and more consistent placement of leads to the centre of the DRTT than conventional methods.

Neuronal activity in vivo enhances functional myelin repair

In demyelinating diseases such as Multiple Sclerosis (MS), demyelination of neuronal fibers impairs impulse conduction and causes axon degeneration. While neuronal activity stimulates oligodendrocyte production and myelination in normal conditions, it remains unclear whether the activity of demyelinated axons restores their loss-of-function in a harmful environment. To investigate this question, we established a model to induce a moderate optogenetic stimulation of demyelinated axons in the corpus callosum at the level of the motor cortex in which cortical circuit activation and locomotor effects were reduced in adult freely moving mice. We demonstrate that a moderate activation of demyelinated axons enhances the differentiation of oligodendrocyte precursor cells onto mature oligodendrocytes, but only under a repeated stimulation paradigm. This activity-dependent increase in the oligodendrocyte pool promotes an extensive remyelination and functional restoration of conduction, as revealed by ultrastructural analyses and compound action potential recordings. Our findings reveal the need of preserving an appropriate neuronal activity in the damaged tissue to promote oligodendrocyte differentiation and remyelination, likely by enhancing axon-oligodendroglia interactions. Our results provide new perspectives for translational research using neuromodulation in demyelinating diseases.

An Unusual Case of Essential Tremor Deep Brain Stimulation: Where is the Lead?

Clinical Vignette

A 73-year-old female with essential tremor (ET) underwent bilateral thalamic ventralis intermedius (Vim) deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. The leads provided tremor benefit, but the location was suboptimal and contributed to stimulation-induced hemichorea.

Clinical Dilemma

Can patients with ET derive benefit when stimulating outside the Vim? What do we know about stimulation-induced hemichorea in the setting of ET?

Clinical Solution

Lead localization combined with advanced programming strategies can be employed to troubleshoot DBS in settings when benefits are observed along with adverse effects.

Gap in Knowledge

Sparse information exists about DBS when applied to neuroanatomic regions outside the Vim for the management of ET. Subthalamic nucleus DBS-induced chorea has been reported in multiple movement disorders, but not in ET.

Movement disorders in early MS and related diseases: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the true prevalence and clinical characteristics of movement disorders in early multiple sclerosis (MS) and related demyelinating diseases. We conducted a prospective study to fill this knowledge gap.

METHODS

A consecutive patient sample was recruited from the MS clinic within a 1-year-period. Patients diagnosed over 5 years before the study start date were excluded. Each eligible patient was interviewed by a movement disorder neurologist who conducted a standardized movement disorder survey and a focused examination. Each patient was followed prospectively for 1-4 follow-up visits. Movement disorders identified on examination were video-recorded and videos were independently rated by a separate blinded movement expert.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included (56.6% female, mean age 38.3 ± 12.7 years). Eighty percent reported one or more movement disorders on the survey and 38.3% had positive findings on examination. After excluding incidental movement disorders (e.g., essential tremor), 58.3% were thought to have demyelination-related movement disorders. The most common movement disorders in a descending order were restless legs syndrome, tremor, tonic spasms, myoclonus, focal dystonia, spontaneous clonus, fasciculations, pseudoathetosis, hyperekplexia, and hemifacial spasm. The movement disorder started 5 months following a relapse on average but in 8 patients it was the presenting symptom of a new relapse or the disease itself. The majority of movement disorders occurred secondary to spinal (85.7%) or cerebellar/brainstem lesions (34.2%). Spinal cord demyelination was the only statistically significant predictor of demyelination-related movement disorders.

CONCLUSION

Movement disorders are more common than previously thought even in early MS. They typically begin a few months after spinal or brainstem/cerebellar relapses but may occasionally be the presenting symptom of a relapse.

A retrospective evaluation of thalamic targeting for tremor deep brain stimulation using high-resolution anatomical imaging with supplementary fiber tractography

OBJECTIVES

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate (Vim) thalamic nucleus is used to treat tremors. Here, we identified the Vim nucleus on fast gray matter acquisition T1 inversion recovery (FGATIR) images and delineated the dentate-rubrothalamic tract (DRT) to determine the DBS target. We evaluated whether this method could consistently identify the Vim nucleus by anatomical imaging and fiber tractography.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of patients who underwent unilateral thalamic DBS for severe tremor disorders. We evaluated outcomes at baseline, 6 months and 1 year following intervention, and annually thereafter. We reviewed preoperative planning to determine whether our tractography technique could consistently depict the DRT, and evaluated implanted electrode position by fusing postoperative CT scans to preoperative MR images.

RESULTS

Seven patients (three men and four women) were included; preoperative diagnoses included essential tremor (n = 3), Parkinson's (n = 2), and Holmes tremor (n = 2). All patients responded to DBS therapy; motor scores improved at 6-month and last follow-up. The Vim nucleus was successfully identified, as the DRT was depicted in all cases. Of ten active DBS contacts in seven leads, four contacts were located outside of the depicted DRT, and these contacts tended to require higher stimulation intensity.

CONCLUSIONS

The Vim nucleus was successfully identified with FGATIR. Our methods may be useful to determine optimal DBS trajectory, and potentially improve outcomes.

Confined Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Refractory Essential Tremor

BACKGROUND

Thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy for medication-refractory essential tremor (ET). However, 13-40% of patients with an initially robust tremor efficacy lose this benefit over time despite reprogramming attempts. At our institution, a cohort of ET patients with VIM DBS underwent implantation of a second anterior (ventralis oralis anterior; VOA) DBS lead to permit "confined stimulation." We sought to assess whether confined stimulation conferred additional tremor capture compared to VIM or VOA stimulation alone.

METHODS

Seven patients participated in a protocol-based programming session during which a video-recorded Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Part A (FTM-A) tremor rating scale was used in the following 4 DBS states: off stimulation, VIM stimulation alone, VOA stimulation alone, and dual lead (confined) stimulation.

RESULTS

The average (SD) baseline FTM-A off score was 17.6 (4.0). VIM stimulation alone lowered the average FTM-A total score to 6.9 (4.0). Confined stimulation further attenuated the tremor, reducing the total score to 5.7 (2.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Confined thalamic DBS can provide additional symptomatic benefits in patients with unsatisfactory tremor control from VIM or VOA stimulation alone.

Surgical treatments for tremors

Stereotactic surgery is an increasingly popular option for disabling tremors whenever it is insufficiently improved by drug treatment. Surgical approaches are expanding. Thalamic deep brain stimulation is one of the most efficacious treatments. Its recent technological advances with adaptive stimulation and new electrodes configuration will allow a more physiological stimulation. However, a reappraisal of less invasive, new lesioning procedures is underway. Gamma Knife thalamotomy and magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasounds encounter very few contraindications. Recent studies reported their efficacy on tremor control and safety profile. Besides the ventralis intermedius nucleus of the thalamus, alternative targets are also emerging. The effectiveness of surgical therapies on essential tremor and Parkinson's disease tremor is well established. For more uncommon tremors, preliminary studies are encouraging. All these surgical therapies can be proposed as treatment option for medically refractory tremors.

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models

Deep brain stimulation (DBS), which involves insertion of an electrode to deliver stimulation to a localized brain region, is an established therapy for movement disorders and is being applied to a growing number of disorders. Computational modeling has been successfully used to predict the clinical effects of DBS; however, there is a need for novel modeling techniques to keep pace with the growing complexity of DBS devices. These models also need to generate predictions quickly and accurately. The goal of this project is to develop an image processing pipeline to incorporate structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) into an interactive, patient specific model to simulate the effects of DBS. A virtual DBS lead can be placed inside of the patient model, along with active contacts and stimulation settings, where changes in lead position or orientation generate a new finite element mesh and solution of the bioelectric field problem in near real-time, a timespan of approximately 10 seconds. This system also enables the simulation of multiple leads in close proximity to allow for current steering by varying anodes and cathodes on different leads. The techniques presented in this paper reduce the burden of generating and using computational models while providing meaningful feedback about the effects of electrode position, electrode design, and stimulation configurations to researchers or clinicians who may not be modeling experts.

Neuromodulation in multiple sclerosis

Neuromodulation, or the utilization of advanced technology for targeted electrical or chemical neuronal stimulation or inhibition, has been expanding in several neurological subspecialties. In the past decades, immune-modulating therapy has been the main focus of multiple sclerosis (MS) research with little attention to neuromodulation. However, with the recent advances in disease-modifying therapies, it is time to shift the focus of MS research to neuromodulation and restoration of function as with other neurological subspecialties. Preliminary research supports the value of intrathecal baclofen pump and functional electrical stimulation in improving spasticity and motor function in MS patients. Deep brain stimulation can improve MS-related tremor and trigeminal neuralgia. Spinal cord stimulation has been shown to be effective against MS-related pain and bladder dysfunction. Bladder overactivity also responds to sacral neuromodulation and posterior tibial nerve stimulation. Despite limited data in MS, transcranial magnetic stimulation and brain-computer interface are promising neuromodulatory techniques for symptom mitigation and neurorehabilitation of MS patients. In this review, we provide an overview of the available neuromodulatory techniques and the evidence for their use in MS.

Deep Brain Stimulation Management of Essential Tremor with Dystonic Features

Clinical Vignette

A 64-year-old female with essential tremor (ET) presents for evaluation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) candidacy. Examination revealed subtle dystonic features as well as a disabling postural-action tremor.

Clinical Dilemma

Can dystonia occur in the setting of the diagnosis of ET and can its presence alter DBS target selection?

Clinical Solution

Unilateral DBS implantation of the ventralis intermedius (Vim) led to improvement in both tremor and dystonic posturing.

Gap in Knowledge

Case reports of DBS in dystonic tremor suggest Vim, globus pallidus internus (GPi), and subthalamic targets may all be effective, to varying degrees, in improving both tremor and dystonia. More rigorous studies are needed to identify the optimal target(s).

Expert Commentary

This case underscores the limited evidence available to guide a clinician’s choice of DBS targets in patients with ET and dystonia. The severity of the dystonia and the presence of more generalized dystonia may alter the thinking about optimal targeting. Vim, GPi, and subthalamic targets appear potentially acceptable options, though Vim is usually the first target attempted when postural-action tremor is the chief complaint. Occasionally, a second rescue DBS lead may be necessary.

Multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis continues to be a challenging and disabling condition but there is now greater understanding of the underlying genetic and environmental factors that drive the condition, including low vitamin D levels, cigarette smoking, and obesity. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial and is supported by diagnostic criteria, incorporating imaging and spinal fluid abnormalities for those presenting with a clinically isolated syndrome. Importantly, there is an extensive therapeutic armamentarium, both oral and by infusion, for those with the relapsing remitting form of the disease. Careful consideration is required when choosing the correct treatment, balancing the side-effect profile with efficacy and escalating as clinically appropriate. This move towards more personalised medicine is supported by a clinical guideline published in 2018. Finally, a comprehensive management programme is strongly recommended for all patients with multiple sclerosis, enhancing health-related quality of life through advocating wellness, addressing aggravating factors, and managing comorbidities. The greatest remaining challenge for multiple sclerosis is the development of treatments incorporating neuroprotection and remyelination to treat and ultimately prevent the disabling, progressive forms of the condition.

Deep brain stimulation in uncommon tremor disorders: indications, targets, and programming

BACKGROUND

In uncommon tremor disorders, clinical efficacy and optimal anatomical targets for deep brain stimulation (DBS) remain inadequately studied and insufficiently quantified.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of PubMed.gov and ClinicalTrials.gov. Relevant articles were identified using the following keywords: "tremor", "Holmes tremor", "orthostatic tremor", "multiple sclerosis", "multiple sclerosis tremor", "neuropathy", "neuropathic tremor", "fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome", and "fragile X."

RESULTS

We identified a total of 263 cases treated with DBS for uncommon tremor disorders. Of these, 44 had Holmes tremor (HT), 18 orthostatic tremor (OT), 177 multiple sclerosis (MS)-associated tremor, 14 neuropathy-associated tremor, and 10 fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). DBS resulted in favorable, albeit partial, clinical improvements in HT cases receiving Vim-DBS alone or in combination with additional targets. A sustained improvement was reported in OT cases treated with bilateral Vim-DBS, while the two cases treated with unilateral Vim-DBS demonstrated only a transient effect. MS-associated tremor responded to dual-target Vim-/VO-DBS, but the inability to account for the progression of MS-associated disability impeded the assessment of its long-term clinical efficacy. Neuropathy-associated tremor substantially improved with Vim-DBS. In FXTAS patients, while Vim-DBS was effective in improving tremor, equivocal results were observed in those with ataxia.

CONCLUSIONS

DBS of select targets may represent an effective therapeutic strategy for uncommon tremor disorders, although the level of evidence is currently in its incipient form and based on single cases or limited case series. An international registry is, therefore, warranted to clarify selection criteria, long-term results, and optimal surgical targets.

Potential indications for deep brain stimulation in neurological disorders: an evolving field

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for appropriately selected patients with movement disorders and neuropsychiatric conditions. Although the exact mechanisms and biology of DBS are not fully understood, it is a safe and well-tolerated therapy for many refractory cases of neuropsychiatric disease. Increasingly, DBS has been explored in other conditions with encouraging results. In this paper, available data is reviewed and new DBS targets, challenges and future directions in neurological disorders are explored. A detailed search of the medical literature discussing the potential use of DBS for neurological disorders excluding accepted indications was conducted. All reports were analyzed individually for content and redundant articles were excluded by examining individual abstracts. The level of evidence for each indication was summarized. Multiple studies report promising preliminary data regarding the safety and efficacy of DBS for a variety of neurological indications including chronic pain, tinnitus, epilepsy, Tourette syndrome, Huntington's disease, tardive dyskinesia and Alzheimer's disease. The initial results of DBS studies for diverse neurological disorders are encouraging but larger, controlled, prospective, homogeneous clinical trials are necessary to establish long-term safety and effectiveness. The field of neuromodulation continues to evolve and advances in DBS technology, stereotactic techniques, neuroimaging and DBS programming capabilities are shaping the present and future of DBS research and use in practice.

Postoperative rehabilitation after deep brain stimulation surgery for movement disorders

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a highly efficient, evidence-based therapy for a set of neurological and psychiatric conditions and especially movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease, essential tremor and dystonia. Recent developments have improved the DBS technology. However, no unequivocal algorithms for an optimized postoperative care exist so far. The aim of this review is to provide a synopsis of the current clinical practice and to propose guidelines for postoperative and rehabilitative care of patients who undergo DBS. A standardized work-up in the DBS centers adapted to each patient's clinical state and needs is important, including a meticulous evaluation of clinical improvement and residual symptoms with a definition of goals for neurorehabilitation. Efficient and complete information transfer to subsequent caregivers is essential. A coordinated therapy within a multidisciplinary team (trained in movement disorders and DBS) is needed to achieve the long-range maximal efficiency. An optimized postoperative framework might ultimately lead to more effective results of DBS.