Hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone for community acquired pneumonia-related septic shock: a subgroup analysis of the APROCCHSS phase 3 randomised trial

Severe Pneumonia

Severe pneumonia is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Being a complex condition caused by a variety of microorganisms including bacteria, viruses, and fungi, it requires intensive care. A combination of early initiation of antimicrobial therapy and adjunctive nonantimicrobial interventions improve patient outcomes. This article reviews the most recent data on the epidemiology, microbiology, diagnosis, and management of severe pneumonia.

[Acute respiratory distress syndrome-quo vadis : Innovative and individualized treatment approaches]

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome characterized by variable pathophysiology and different therapeutic approaches. Recent guidelines emphasize the importance of prone positioning and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) for the most severe cases, while routine recruitment maneuvers and extracorporeal CO2-removal techniques are no longer recommended. To further advance the personalization of ARDS therapy, the identification of ARDS phenotypes using latent class analysis offers promising approaches for individualized treatment. Additionally, adaptive platform trials and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven decision-support systems may optimize future ARDS management. The future of ARDS treatment is becoming increasingly individualized, based on improved patient stratification, innovative study designs, and the targeted use of modern technologies. This article summarizes recent developments in ARDS therapy, particularly regarding personalized treatment strategies, new study designs, and the application of artificial intelligence.

Effect of hydrocortisone on mortality in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia : The REMAP-CAP Corticosteroid Domain Randomized Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

To determine whether hydrocortisone improves mortality in severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

METHODS

In an international adaptive randomized controlled platform trial testing multiple interventions, adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with severe CAP were randomized to a 7-day course of intravenous hydrocortisone (50 mg every 6 h) or control (no corticosteroid). The primary end point was 90-day all-cause mortality, analyzed iteratively by a Bayesian hierarchical model estimating distinct treatment effects for patients presenting with influenza (Y/N) and shock (Y/N).

RESULTS

Fixed 7-day course hydrocortisone enrollment was stopped for futility (< 5% probability of > 20% relative improvement). Of 658 patients enrolled, 536 were randomized to hydrocortisone and 122 to control. Vital status at day 90 was missing for 15 patients. Day 90 mortality was 15% (78/521) and 9.8% (12/122) for the hydrocortisone and control groups. The adjusted odds ratio ranged from 1.52 to 1.63 (with all 95% CrI crossing 1), while the probability of > 20% relative reduction of day 90 mortality ranged from 7.1 to 3.3% across influenza and shock strata. Results were consistent in sensitivity and pre-specified secondary outcomes. In exploratory analyses, the duration of shock appeared lower in the hydrocortisone group compared with control (median (IQR) of 2 (2-5) days compared to control 3 (2-6.75) days, p value = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with severe CAP, treatment with a 7-day course of hydrocortisone, compared with no hydrocortisone, appears unlikely to yield a large reduction in mortality. Smaller benefits and possible harm are not excluded.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02735707 (registration date: November 4th, 2016).

Effect of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone combination on mortality in septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the effect of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone combination therapy on the mortality of patients with septic shock.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and other databases for articles published until October 1, 2023. Only clinical studies that assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone therapy for the treatment of septic shock were included. The primary outcome was the in-hospital mortality rate.

RESULTS

Seven studies with a total of 90, 756 patients were included. The study group exhibited lower in-hospital mortality rates (40.8% vs. 42.8%; OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.92). Compared to the control group, the study group also had lower intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95), 28-day mortality (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72-1.00), 90-day mortality (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.71-1.01), 180-day mortality (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-0.90), and one-year mortality (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.42-1.16). Subgroup analyses showed a similar trend, particularly prominent in the pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials, multicenter studies, and ICU patients, the study drug regimen involved hydrocortisone at a dose of 50 mg every 6 h in combination with fludrocortisone at 50 µg daily, with the control group receiving either placebo or standard care. Hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone also increased vasopressor-free days and reduced vasopressor duration, without elevating the risk of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasizes the potential survival benefits of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone combination therapy for patients with septic shock and its additional advantages, including reduced vasopressor use.

[Septic shock]

Due to a large number of nosocomial, but also hospital-associated infections, sepsis and therefore septic shock occur frequently in everyday clinical practice. Considering the high prevalence and mortality rate of the disease and its complexity, precise knowledge of pathophysiology, diagnostics and therapy is essential for every clinical doctor.Because time in this case is such a critical factor, patients in septic shock in particular require a standardized approach and targeted, swift diagnostics to start adequate treatment as soon as possible. In addition to hemodynamic stabilization, the treatment of the infection's origin is particularly important.This article is intended to provide an overview of the most important diagnostic tools, treatment strategies and concepts, as well as practical assistance for everyday clinical practice.

Safety of steroids in severe community-acquired pneumonia

The systemic use of corticosteroids for patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) remains controversial in clinical practice, particularly in terms of the safety profile of these drugs. This narrative review aims to analyse the available literature data concerning the safety of short-term steroid use in the treatment of sCAP, while also highlighting potential future research directions. Several trials and meta-analyses have evaluated corticosteroid therapy as an adjuvant treatment for sCAP, yielding heterogeneous results regarding its efficacy and safety. Despite the wide variability in results, it is generally accepted that steroids are not associated with a significant risk of healthcare-associated infections, gastrointestinal bleeding or acute kidney injury in patients with sCAP in the short term. Nevertheless, such drugs are linked to hyperglycaemia, necessitating regular monitoring and appropriate management. The influence of steroids on long-term outcomes and their potential risks in viral sCAP still needs to be investigated.

[What is confirmed in the treatment of sepsis? : An update]

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is defined as "being evoked as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by an inadequate host response to infection". The most recent German S3 guidelines were published in 2018 and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) last published the current recommendations for the treatment of sepsis and septic shock in 2021.

OBJECTIVE

This article explores and discusses which evidence in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock has been confirmed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Discussion of the 2018 German S3 guidelines, supplementation of the content of the 2021 international guidelines and recent research results since 2021.

RESULTS

The primary objective for managing sepsis and septic shock still includes rapid identification, early initiation of anti-infective treatment, and focus cleansing when feasible. In addition, the focus is on hemodynamic stabilization, including the early use of vasopressors for prevention of hypervolemia and, if necessary, the use of organ support procedures. Supportive treatment, such as the administration of corticosteroids and the use of apheresis, can be advantageous in specific scenarios. The focus is increasingly shifting towards post-intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up care, improving the quality of life after surviving sepsis and the close involvement of relatives of the patient.

CONCLUSION

Despite the fact that considerable progress has been made in understanding the pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis, the early administration of anti-infective agents, focus control, nuanced volume therapy and the use of catecholamines continue to be fundamental to sepsis management. New recommendations emphasize the early use of vasopressors (primarily norepinephrine) and the administration of corticosteroids, especially in cases of septic shock and pneumonia.

Low-Dose Corticosteroids for Critically Ill Adults With Severe Pulmonary Infections: A Review

Importance

Severe pulmonary infections, including COVID-19, community-acquired pneumonia, influenza, and Pneumocystis pneumonia, are a leading cause of death among adults worldwide. Pulmonary infections in critically ill patients may cause septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or both, which are associated with mortality rates ranging between 30% and 50%.

Observations

Corticosteroids mitigate the immune response to infection and improve outcomes for patients with several types of severe pulmonary infections. Low-dose corticosteroids, defined as less than or equal to 400 mg hydrocortisone equivalent daily, can reduce mortality of patients with severe COVID-19, community-acquired pneumonia, and Pneumocystis pneumonia. A randomized clinical trial of 6425 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who required supplemental oxygen or noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation reported that dexamethasone 6 mg daily for 10 days decreased 28-day mortality (23% vs 26%). A meta-analysis that included 7 randomized clinical trials of 1689 patients treated in the intensive care unit for severe bacterial community-acquired pneumonia reported that hydrocortisone equivalent less than or equal to 400 mg daily for 8 days or fewer was associated with lower 30-day mortality compared with placebo (10% vs 16%). In a meta-analysis of 6 randomized clinical trials, low-dose corticosteroids were associated with lower mortality rates compared with placebo for patients with HIV and moderate to severe Pneumocystis pneumonia (13% vs 25%). In a predefined subgroup analysis of a trial of low-dose steroid treatment for septic shock, patients with community-acquired pneumonia randomized to 7 days of intravenous hydrocortisone 50 mg every 6 hours and fludrocortisone 50 μg daily had decreased mortality compared with the placebo group (39% vs 51%). For patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by various conditions, low-dose corticosteroids were associated with decreased in-hospital mortality (34% vs 45%) according to a meta-analysis of 8 studies that included 1091 patients. Adverse effects of low-dose corticosteroids may include hyperglycemia, gastrointestinal bleeding, neuropsychiatric disorders, muscle weakness, hypernatremia, and secondary infections.

Conclusions and Relevance

Treatment with low-dose corticosteroids is associated with decreased mortality for patients with severe COVID-19 infection, severe community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, and moderate to severe Pneumocystis pneumonia (for patients with HIV). Low-dose corticosteroids may also benefit critically ill patients with respiratory infections who have septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or both.