Association of active mobilisation variables with adverse events and mortality in patients requiring mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Australian clinical practice guideline for physical rehabilitation and mobilisation in adult intensive care units

BACKGROUND

The evidence base for research on physical rehabilitation and mobilisation in the intensive care unit has led to uncertainty about best practice.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this guideline was to develop evidence-based recommendations to support clinical decision-making for physical rehabilitation management of adults undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation in Australian intensive care units.

METHODS

The guideline development group, comprising national representation of clinical experts, methodologists, and consumers, followed a rigorous process, adhering to Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Guidelines for Guidelines, to create the recommendations. The guideline development group determined the scope of the guideline and defined the key clinical question. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate all available evidence based on the predefined outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed using a restricted maximum likelihood approach, and results were summarised in an evidence profile. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was applied to evaluate the certainty of evidence, and the GRADE Evidence to Decision framework was used to formulate recommendations.

SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the evidence profile and GRADE Evidence to Decision framework, the group developed three conditional recommendations and 14 Good Clinical Practice statements to guide practice. The guideline provides conditional recommendations in favour of undertaking physical rehabilitation and mobilisation in adults receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit whilst acknowledging the uncertainty of evidence. It was endorsed by four key professional organisations.

CONCLUSION

The recommendations within this guideline were developed following best methodological practice. Despite the overall low certainty of evidence, the resulting guideline provides support to clinical decision-making, facilitates the translation of research into practice, and enhances the reach and impact of clinical research. Additionally, the guideline development group identified evidence gaps that could be addressed by future research.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

ICU Mobility Scale translation to French and validation

The ICU Mobility Scale (IMS) is a valid tool to describe a patient's mobility in the ICU. The primary objective of this study was to translate IMS into French and assess its inter-rater reliability. Secondary objectives included describing the mobility and suitability of IMS to French practices. French physiotherapists created a French version of IMS (IMS-FR) through a structured translation process. The English back-translation was validated by the author of the original IMS, confirming the semantic conservation. Inter-rater reliability was assessed in a multicentric prospective study across six French ICUs. The concordance of six assessors, including physiotherapists, nurses, and physicians was measured through Kendall's W and weighted kappa. A total of 92 patients were included, with a median ICU stay of 5 (2-13) days and median age of 63 (54-82) years. Median IMS-FR score was 1 (0.5-5). Overall inter-rater reliability was excellent, with a Kendall's W of 0.90. Among the same professional group, weighted kappa were 0.80 for nurses, 0.86 for physicians, and 0.97 for physiotherapists. Between different professional groups, weighted kappa were 0.82 for nurses compared to both physicians and physiotherapists and 0.89 for physicians compared to physiotherapists. An additional form was sent to 30 French physiotherapists to explore the correspondence of IMS-FR classification with their clinical practices. Their ranking of IMS-FR items was well-aligned with the original of IMS. IMS-FR is available for French ICUs, supporting the implementation of early mobilization strategies and enhancing interdisciplinary communication. Future studies should explore other psychometric properties of the IMS-FR and its impact on rehabilitation practices in ICUs.

Effects of rapid chest compression technique on intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures in acute neurocritical patients: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Some studies refer to the increase in intracranial pressure (ICP) with chest physiotherapy techniques but without any randomized controlled trials that evaluate the safety of the manual rapid chest compression technique in patients with severe acute brain injuries on invasive mechanical ventilation. Our research question examines whether intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures significantly change during rapid chest compression technique.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, single-blinded controlled trial of acute neurocritical patients under mechanical ventilation was performed. The intervention group was subjected to rapid chest compression, and the control group received mechanical passive inferior limbs mobilization. The outcomes were intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, blood partial pressure of oxygen and carbon dioxide, and inspiratory and expiratory peak flows.

RESULTS

Between May 2021 and December 2023, 50 patients (aged 56.3 years), 66% females, were randomized into two groups (25 controls and 25 interventions). The ICP and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) did not significantly differ between the groups at any of the studied times. Intragroup analysis revealed significant decreases in the ICP and CPP in the intervention group, with posterior recovery in both groups. The CPP significantly decreased in the control group but did not reach the preintervention values at the last measurement time. PaCO2 was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group at the end of the study.

CONCLUSION

The rapid chest compression technique did not increase the ICP during its application or even 30 min after it. The ICP showed a slight significant decrease during the application of the rapid chest compression technique but reached the previous values in the posterior 30 min. CPP had a similar behavior but did not completely recover in both groups.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03609866. Registered on 08/01/2018.

Early mobilisation in patients with shock and receiving vasoactive drugs in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility and safety of early mobilisation in patients with shock requiring vasoactive drugs in the intensive care unit (ICU).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Intensive care unit (ICU).

PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients requiring vasoactive drugs who received early mobilisation in the intensive care unit.

INTERVENTIONS

A systematic search was conducted using the databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Medline Ovid, Science Direct, and CINAHL, including observational studies involving adult patients requiring vasoactive drugs who received early mobilisation. A meta-analysis was performed on the proportion of safety events and the proportion of early mobilisation in patients with high, moderate, and low doses of vasoactive drugs.

MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST

Feasibility, safety events, and the maximum level of activity achieved during early mobilisation.

RESULTS

The search yielded 1875 studies, of which 8 were included in the systematic review and 5 in the meta-analysis. The results showed that 64% (95% CI: 34%-95%, p<0.05) of patients were mobilised with low doses of vasoactive drugs, 30% (95% CI: 7%-53%, p<0.05) with moderate doses, and 7% (95% CI: 3%-16%, p 0.17) with high doses. The proportion of adverse events was low, at 2% (95% CI: 1%-4%, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Early mobilisation in patients with shock and the need for vasoactive drugs is feasible and generally safe. However, there is an emphasis on the need for further high-quality research to confirm these findings.

Optimizing infection control: Evaluating nurses' knowledge and practices for preventing infections in mechanically ventilated patients

INTRODUCTION

Infection control is crucial in healthcare, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs), where patients are at high risk of infection due to mechanical ventilation. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common hospital-acquired infections in ICUs, leading to increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and elevated healthcare costs. Nurses are essential in implementing infection control measures to prevent these infections. Evaluating their knowledge and practices is key to identifying areas for improvement.

AIM

This study assesses ICU nurses' knowledge and practices regarding infection control, particularly in preventing VAP in mechanically ventilated patients.

METHODS

A descriptive observational study was conducted at King Fahad Specialist Hospital in Saudi Arabia. Participants were selected using purposive sampling based on their experience and direct care responsibilities. Data were collected using a self-report questionnaire and an observational checklist. The questionnaire assessed knowledge across domains such as infection control principles and VAP prevention, while the checklist evaluated practices like hand hygiene and adherence to VAP bundles.

RESULTS

The study found that 61.2 % of nurses demonstrated satisfactory infection control practices, with hand hygiene showing the highest compliance (81.8 %). However, VAP bundle adherence was low (42.4 %). Knowledge gaps were also identified, especially in VAP prevention and oral care.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest a need for targeted educational programs to improve infection control practices among ICU nurses. Enhanced training could address observed gaps in knowledge and practice, particularly in VAP prevention and oral care, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Concurrent nutrition and physical rehabilitation interventions for patients with critical illness

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The effects of either physical rehabilitation or nutrition on outcomes in patients with critical illness are variable and remain unclear. The potential for the combination of exercise and nutritional delivered concurrently to provide benefit is provocative, but data are only emerging. Herein, we provide a summary of evidence from 2023 and 2024 on combined physical rehabilitation and nutrition during and following critical illness.

RECENT FINDINGS

While latest trials on physical rehabilitation alone reported conflicting findings, recent nutrition trials found no difference between higher and lower protein delivery and even suggested harm in patients with acute kidney injury. In 2023 and 2024, we identified four studies (one randomized controlled trial) combining physical rehabilitation and nutrition (mainly protein supplementation) within the ICU setting. Overall, these suggested benefits, including reduction of muscle size loss, ICU acquired weakness, delirium, and improved mobility levels, although these benefits did not extend to mortality and hospital length of stay. No recent trials combining physical rehabilitation and nutrition for patients after ICU were identified.

SUMMARY

Current insights on combined physical rehabilitation and nutrition suggest improved clinically relevant outcomes, but further investigations across the continuum of care of patients with critical illness are warranted.

Weakness acquired in the cardiac intensive care unit: still the elephant in the room?

Over the past two decades, the cardiac critical care population has shifted to increasingly comorbid and elderly patients often presenting with nonprimary cardiac conditions that exacerbate underlying advanced cardiac disease. Consequently, the modern cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patient has poor outcome regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction. Importantly, delayed liberation from organ support, independent from premorbid health status and admission severity of illness, has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality up to years post-general critical care. Although a constellation of several acquired morbidities is at play, the most prominent enactor of poor long-term outcome in this population appears to be intensive care unit acquired weakness. Although the specific burden of ICU-acquired morbidities in CICU patients is yet to be clearly defined, it seems unfathomable that patients will not accrue some sort of ICU-related morbidity. There is hence an urgent need to better establish the exact benefit and cost of resource-intensive strategies in both short- and long-term survival of the CICU patient. Consequent and standardized documentation of admission comorbidities, severity of illness indicators, relevant ICU-related complications including weakness, and long-term post-ICU morbidity outcomes can help our understanding of the disease continuum and how to better care for the CICU survivor and their families and caregivers. Given increasing budgetary pressure on healthcare systems worldwide, interventions targeting CICU patients should focus on improving patient-centred long-term outcomes in a cost-effective manner. It will require a holistic and transmural continuity of care model to meet the challenges associated with treating critically ill cardiac patients in the future.

Intensive care unit acquired weakness and physical rehabilitation in the ICU

Approximately half of critically ill adults experience intensive care unit acquired weakness (ICUAW). Patients who develop ICUAW may have negative outcomes, including longer duration of mechanical ventilation, greater length of stay, and worse mobility, physical functioning, quality of life, and mortality. Early physical rehabilitation interventions have potential for improving ICUAW; however, randomized trials show inconsistent findings on the efficacy of these interventions. This review summarizes the latest evidence on the definition, diagnosis, epidemiology, pathophysiology, risks factors, implications, and management of ICUAW. It specifically highlights research gaps and challenges, with considerations for future research for physical rehabilitation interventions.

Updates on Post-Intensive Care Syndrome After Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Epidemiology, Core Outcomes, Interventions, and Long-Term Follow-Up

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) survivors often experience post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), is defined as new or worsened impairments in physical, cognitive and/or mental health status persisting beyond hospital discharge. These impairments negatively impact survivors' quality of life and their return to work or usual activities. Moreover, family members are also impacted as recognized by the term, PICS-Family (PICS-F). PICS poses an increased burden on the health care system and has a negative societal impact. There are ongoing efforts to understand risk factors for PICS-related impairments; design and evaluate interventions for specific impairments (including the use of an ARDS survivorship core outcome set); and refine and evaluate ICU recovery clinics to support and treat survivors and their families.

PRACTICE: Development of a Core Outcome Set for Trials of Physical Rehabilitation in Critical Illness

Rationale: Findings from individual trials of physical rehabilitation interventions in critically ill adults have limited potential for meta-analysis and informing clinical decision-making because of the heterogeneity in selection and reporting of outcomes used for evaluation. Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine a core outcome set (COS) for use in all future trials evaluating physical rehabilitation interventions delivered across the critical illness continuum of recovery. Methods: An international, two-round, online, modified Delphi consensus process, following recommended standards, was conducted. Participants (N = 329) comprised three stakeholder groups-researchers, n = 58 (18%); clinicians, n = 247 (75%); and patients and caregivers, n = 24 (7%)-and represented 26 countries and nine healthcare professions. Participants rated the importance of a range of relevant outcomes. Outcomes included in the COS were those prioritized of "critical importance" by all three stakeholder groups. Results: Survey response rates were 88% (Round 1) and 91% (Round 2). From a total of 32 initial outcomes, the following outcomes reached consensus for inclusion in the COS: physical function, activities of daily living, survival, health-related quality of life, exercise capacity, cognitive function, emotional and mental well-being, and frailty. Conclusions: This study developed a consensus-generated COS for future clinical research evaluating physical rehabilitation interventions in critically ill adults across the continuum of recovery. Ascertaining recommended measurement instruments for these core outcomes is now required to facilitate implementation of the COS.

Leg Cycle Ergometry in Critically Ill Patients - An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Cycle ergometry is a rehabilitation strategy used in the intensive care unit (ICU) which may help mitigate post-ICU impairments. We aimed to systematically review and summarize evidence examining the efficacy and safety of cycle ergometry in the ICU.

METHODS

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of critically ill adults with any diagnosis admitted to the ICU for >24 hours, comparing cycling interventions to control (no cycling). The primary outcome was physical function, using a hierarchical approach to standardize this outcome across trials. We performed random-effects meta-analyses and assessed the certainty of effect estimates using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

We included 33 RCTs that enrolled 3274 patients. Cycling may improve physical function at ICU discharge (12 RCTs, 1291 patients, standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.33 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.05 to 0.62], low certainty) and posthospital discharge (8 RCTs, 865 patients, SMD, 0.23, [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.42], low certainty). Cycling may decrease ICU length of stay (29 RCTs, 2575 patients, mean difference [MD], 1.06 days fewer [95% CI, 0.33 to 1.80 days fewer], low certainty) and probably decreases hospital length of stay (22 RCTs, 2060 patients, MD, 1.48 days fewer [95% CI, 0.47 to 2.49 days fewer], moderate certainty). Cycling may have no effect on ICU mortality (17 RCTs, 2039 patients, risk ratio, 12 fewer deaths per 1000 [95% CI, 43 fewer to 23 more], low certainty). The pooled rate of adverse events in the intervention group was 1% (11 RCTs, 4623 sessions, [95% CI, 0 to 2%], low certainty) and in the comparison group, 2% (6 RCTs, 3365 sessions, [95% CI, 0 to 5%], low certainty).

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis, we found that cycling with critically ill patients may improve physical function at ICU discharge and after hospital discharge, may reduce ICU length of stay, and probably reduces hospital length of stay, with no effect on other outcomes including mortality. We observed low to very low certainty of evidence for all but one outcome of interest. Adverse events were uncommon. (PROSPERO number, CRD 42018092132.).

Early mobilization in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage may im-prove functional status and reduce cerebral vasospasm rate: a systematic review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of early mobilization in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies and observational studies.

PATIENTS

Patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Pedro, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Screening and data extraction were performed by 2 independent reviewers.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies involving 1,757 patients were included. Meta-analysis of the data estimated that early mobilization improved mRS score at discharge (mean difference -1.39, 95% CI -2.51 to -0.28, I2 = 86%) and at 3 months (mean difference -1.10, 95% CI -1.54 to -0.66, I2 = 7%). Early mobilization was associated with a reduction in cerebral vasospasm rate, both radiological (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.96, I2 = 7%) and clinical (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.72, I2 = 8%); 6% of mobilization sessions involved adverse events, mostly haemodynamic changes.

CONCLUSION

This review found moderate-quality evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of early mobilization in patients with SAH. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to identify the appropriate mobilization strategy and confirm these results.

Meeting complex multidimensional needs in older patients and their families during and beyond critical illness

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight the emerging crisis of critically ill elderly patients and review the unique burden of multidimensional morbidity faced by these patients and caregivers and potential interventions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Physical, psychological, and cognitive sequelae after critical illness are frequent, durable, and robust across the international ICU outcome literature. Elderly patients are more vulnerable to the multisystem sequelae of critical illness and its treatment and the resultant multidimensional morbidity may be profound, chronic, and significantly affect functional independence, transition to the community, and quality of life for patients and families. Recent data reinforce the importance of baseline functional status, health trajectory, and chronic illness as key determinants of long-term functional disability after ICU. These risks are even more pronounced in older patients.

SUMMARY

The current article is an overview of the outcomes of older survivors of critical illness, putative interventions to mitigate the long-term morbidity of patients, and the consequences for families and caregivers. A multimodal longitudinal approach designed to follow patients for one or more years may foster a better understanding of multidimensional morbidity faced by vulnerable older patients and families and provides a detailed understanding of recovery trajectories in this unique population to optimize outcome, goals of care directives, and ongoing informed consent to ICU treatment.

Early In-Bed Cycle Ergometry in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

BACKGROUND

Critical illness requiring invasive mechanical ventilation can precipitate important functional disability, contributing to multidimensional morbidity following admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). Early in-bed cycle ergometry added to usual physiotherapy may mitigate ICU-acquired physical function impairment.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 360 adult ICU patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation to receive 30 minutes of early in-bed Cycling + Usual physiotherapy (n=178) or Usual physiotherapy alone (n=182). The primary outcome was the Physical Function ICU Test-scored (PFIT-s) at 3 days after discharge from the ICU (the score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better function).

RESULTS

Cycling began within a median (interquartile range) of 2 (1 to 3) days of starting mechanical ventilation; patients received 3 (2 to 5) cycling sessions for a mean (±standard deviation) of 27.2 ± 6.6 minutes. In both groups, patients started Usual physiotherapy within 2 (2 to 4) days of mechanical ventilation and received 4 (2 to 7) Usual physiotherapy sessions. The duration of Usual physiotherapy was 23.7 ± 15.1 minutes in the Cycling + Usual physiotherapy group and 29.1 ± 13.2 minutes in the Usual physiotherapy group. No serious adverse events occurred in either group. Among survivors, the PFIT-s at 3 days after discharge from the ICU was 7.7 ± 1.7 in the Cycling + Usual physiotherapy group and 7.5 ± 1.7 in the Usual physiotherapy group (absolute difference, 0.23 points; 95% confidence interval, -0.19 to 0.65; P=0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Among adults receiving mechanical ventilation in the ICU, adding early in-bed Cycling to usual physiotherapy did not improve physical function at 3 days after discharge from the ICU compared with Usual physiotherapy alone. Cycling did not cause any serious adverse events. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03471247 [full randomized clinical trial] and NCT02377830 [CYCLE Vanguard 46-patient internal pilot].).

Assessing the safety of physical rehabilitation in critically ill patients: a Delphi study

BACKGROUND

Physical rehabilitation of critically ill patients is implemented to improve physical outcomes from an intensive care stay. However, before rehabilitation is implemented, a risk assessment is essential, based on robust safety data. To develop this information, a uniform definition of relevant adverse events is required. The assessment of cardiovascular stability is particularly relevant before physical activity as there is uncertainty over when it is safe to start rehabilitation with patients receiving vasoactive drugs.

METHODS

A three-stage Delphi study was carried out to (a) define adverse events for a general ICU cohort, and (b) to define which risks should be assessed before physical rehabilitation of patients receiving vasoactive drugs. An international group of intensive care clinicians and clinician researchers took part. Former ICU patients and their family members/carers were involved in generating consensus for the definition of adverse events. Round one was an open round where participants gave their suggestions of what to include. In round two, participants rated their agreements with these suggestions using a five-point Likert scale; a 70% consensus agreement threshold was used. Round three was used to re-rate suggestions that had not reached consensus, whilst viewing anonymous feedback of participant ratings from round two.

RESULTS

Twenty-four multi-professional ICU clinicians and clinician researchers from 10 countries across five continents were recruited. Average duration of ICU experience was 18 years (standard deviation 8) and 61% had publications related to ICU rehabilitation. For the adverse event definition, five former ICU patients and one patient relative were recruited. The Delphi process had a 97% response rate. Firstly, 54 adverse events reached consensus; an adverse event tool was created and informed by these events. Secondly, 50 risk factors requiring assessment before physical rehabilitation of patients receiving vasoactive drugs reached consensus. A second tool was created, informed by these suggestions.

CONCLUSIONS

The adverse event tool can be used in studies of physical rehabilitation to ensure uniform measurement of safety. The risk assessment tool can be used to inform clinical practise when risk assessing when to start rehabilitation with patients receiving vasoactive drugs. Trial registration This study protocol was retrospectively registered on https://www.researchregistry.com/ (researchregistry2991).