Efficacy and safety of grazoprevir (MK-5172) and elbasvir (MK-8742) in patients with hepatitis C virus and HIV co-infection (C-EDGE CO-INFECTION): a non-randomised, open-label trial

Exploring the synthetic approaches and clinical prowess of established macrocyclic pharmaceuticals

Macrocyclic compounds, characterized by cyclic structures, often originate from either modified forms of unicyclic canonical molecules or natural products. Within the field of medicinal chemistry, there has been a growing fascination with drug-like macrocycles in recent years, primarily due to compelling evidence indicating that macrocyclization can significantly influence both the biological and physiochemical properties, as well as the selectivity, when compared to their acyclic counterparts. The approval of contemporary pharmaceutical agents like Lorlatinib underscore the notable clinical relevance of drug-like macrocycles. Nonetheless, the synthesis of these drug-like macrocycles poses substantial challenges, primarily stemming from the complexity of ring-closing reactions, which are inherently dependent on the size and geometry of the bridging linker, impacting overall yields. Nevertheless, macrocycles offer a promising avenue for expanding the synthetic toolkit in medicinal chemistry, enabling the creation of bioactive compounds. To shed light on the subject, we delve into the clinical prowess of established macrocyclic drugs, spanning various therapeutic areas, including oncology, and infectious diseases. Case studies of clinically approved macrocyclic agents illustrate their profound impact on patient care and disease management. As we embark on this journey through the world of macrocyclic pharmaceuticals, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of their synthesis and clinical applications, shedding light on the pivotal role they play in modern medicine.

Contribution of alcohol use in HIV/hepatitis C virus co-infection to all-cause and cause-specific mortality: A collaboration of cohort studies

Among persons with HIV (PWH), higher alcohol use and having hepatitis C virus (HCV) are separately associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We investigated whether the association between alcohol use and mortality among PWH is modified by HCV. Data were combined from European and North American cohorts of adult PWH who started antiretroviral therapy (ART). Self-reported alcohol use data, collected in diverse ways between cohorts, were converted to grams/day. Eligible PWH started ART during 2001-2017 and were followed from ART initiation for mortality. Interactions between the associations of baseline alcohol use (0, 0.1-20.0, >20.0 g/day) and HCV status were assessed using multivariable Cox models. Of 58,769 PWH, 29,711 (51%), 23,974 (41%) and 5084 (9%) self-reported alcohol use of 0 g/day, 0.1-20.0 g/day, and > 20.0 g/day, respectively, and 4799 (8%) had HCV at baseline. There were 844 deaths in 37,729 person-years and 2755 deaths in 443,121 person-years among those with and without HCV, respectively. Among PWH without HCV, adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for mortality were 1.18 (95% CI: 1.08-1.29) for 0.0 g/day and 1.84 (1.62-2.09) for >20.0 g/day compared with 0.1-20.0 g/day. This J-shaped pattern was absent among those with HCV: aHRs were 1.00 (0.86-1.17) for 0.0 g/day and 1.64 (1.33-2.02) for >20.0 g/day compared with 0.1-20.0 g/day (interaction p < .001). Among PWH without HCV, mortality was higher in both non-drinkers and heavy drinkers compared with moderate alcohol drinkers. Among those with HCV, mortality was higher in heavy drinkers but not non-drinkers, potentially due to differing reasons for not drinking (e.g. illness) between those with and without HCV.

Impact of hepatitis C cure on risk of mortality and morbidity in people with HIV after antiretroviral therapy initiation

OBJECTIVE

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infection is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in people with HIV (PWH). Sustained virological response (SVR) decreases the risk of HCV-associated morbidity. We compared mortality, risk of AIDS-defining events, and non-AIDS nonliver (NANL) cancers between HCV-co-infected PWH who reached SVR and mono-infected PWH.

DESIGN

Adult PWH from 21 cohorts in Europe and North America that collected HCV treatment data were eligible if they were HCV-free at the time of ART initiation.

METHODS

Up to 10 mono-infected PWH were matched (on age, sex, date of ART start, HIV acquisition route, and being followed at the time of SVR) to each HCV-co-infected PWH who reached SVR. Cox models were used to estimate relative hazards (hazard ratio) of all-cause mortality, AIDS-defining events, and NANL cancers after adjustment.

RESULTS

Among 62 495 PWH, 2756 acquired HCV, of whom 649 reached SVR. For 582 of these, at least one mono-infected PWH could be matched, producing a total of 5062 mono-infected PWH. The estimated hazard ratios comparing HCV-co-infected PWH who reached SVR with mono-infected PWH were 0.29 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-0.73] for mortality, 0.85 [0.42-1.74] for AIDS-defining events, and 1.21 [0.86-1.72] for NANL cancer.

CONCLUSION

PWH who reached SVR a short time after HCV acquisition were not at higher risk of overall mortality compared with mono-infected PWH. However, the apparent higher risk of NANL cancers in HCV-co-infected PWH who reached SVR after a DAA-based treatment compared with mono-infected PWH, though compatible with a null association, suggests a need for monitoring of those events following SVR.

Effectiveness of elbasvir/grazoprevir plus ribavirin for hepatitis C virus genotype 1a infection and baseline NS5A resistance

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

In clinical trials, patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT)1a infection and baseline resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) at amino acid positions 28, 30, 31, or 93 receiving elbasvir/grazoprevir for 12 weeks achieved lower rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) than those without baseline RASs. SVR rates in patients with RASs were improved when elbasvir/grazoprevir treatment duration was extended from 12 to 16 weeks and administered concomitantly with ribavirin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational analysis using electronic health record abstraction. Patients with HCV GT1a infection and RASs at positions 28, 30, 31, or 93 who were prescribed 16 weeks of elbasvir/grazoprevir and ≥ 1 prescription for ribavirin were included. SVR was defined as HCV RNA below the lower limit of quantification ≥ 70 days after end of treatment.

RESULTS

The primary analysis included patients with baseline RASs at positions 30, 31, or 93 (n = 76); a secondary analysis included patients with RASs at positions 28, 30, 31, or 93 (n = 93). SVR was achieved by 77.6% (59/76) of patients in the primary analysis and 80.6% (75/93) of those in the secondary analysis. Of the 18 (19.4%) patients in the secondary cohort who failed to achieve SVR, 8 relapsed (4 with treatment-emergent NS5A substitutions) and 10 did not have viral sequencing to distinguish relapse from reinfection.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis highlights the opportunities in leveraging real-world data to further understand treatment outcomes in smaller, discrete subgroups of patients with HCV infection who cannot be thoroughly evaluated in clinical trials.

Elbasvir/grazoprevir in children aged 3-18 years with chronic HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection: a pharmacokinetic modeling study

BACKGROUND

Approximately 3.5 million children and adolescents worldwide are chronically infected with HCV. This study uses pharmacokinetic modeling to identify pediatric doses of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) that achieve plasma concentrations similar to those seen in adults receiving the approved fixed-dose combination regimen of EBR/GZR.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a nonrandomized, single-arm, multicenter, open-label phase 2b trial in children and adolescents aged 3 to <18 years with chronic HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection (NCT03379506). Pharmacokinetic data were used to bridge efficacy and safety data from adults to children in a stepwise (oldest to youngest) manner. A total of 57 participants were enrolled: cohort 1 (aged 12 to <18 y), n=22; cohort 2 (aged 7 to <12 y), n=17; and cohort 3 (aged 3 to <7 y), n=18.

RESULTS

Steady-state plasma exposures were achieved by week 4 for EBR and GZR in all cohorts and daily dosing achieved geometric mean steady-state area under the concentration-time curve at 0-24 hours that fell within comparability bounds established for adults. All participants achieved sustained virologic response 12 weeks after completing treatment (ie, undetectable HCV RNA 12 wk following completion of treatment). Headache (n=4), fatigue (n=4), and nausea (n=2) were the most common treatment-related adverse events (all mild or moderate); no participant discontinued because of an adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric EBR/GZR pharmacokinetic models were successfully developed based on complex adult population pharmacokinetic models. At appropriate age-related doses, EBR/GZR is safe and effective in pediatric and adolescent participants with HCV infection.

Multidimensional control of therapeutic human cell function with synthetic gene circuits

Synthetic gene circuits that precisely control human cell function could expand the capabilities of gene- and cell-based therapies. However, platforms for developing circuits in primary human cells that drive robust functional changes in vivo and have compositions suitable for clinical use are lacking. Here, we developed synthetic zinc finger transcription regulators (synZiFTRs), which are compact and based largely on human-derived proteins. As a proof of principle, we engineered gene switches and circuits that allow precise, user-defined control over therapeutically relevant genes in primary T cells using orthogonal, US Food and Drug Administration-approved small-molecule inducers. Our circuits can instruct T cells to sequentially activate multiple cellular programs such as proliferation and antitumor activity to drive synergistic therapeutic responses. This platform should accelerate the development and clinical translation of synthetic gene circuits in diverse human cell types and contexts.

An observational, prospective, multicenter study on the utilization and effectiveness of elbasvir-grazoprevir treatment association for chronic hepatitis C in France (ZEPHYR study)

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The efficacy and safety profiles of elbasvir-grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) has been established in more than 10 clinical trials. However, the characteristics of patients treated in routine clinical practice may differ. The present study was therefore designed to assess the real-life effectiveness of EBR/GZR therapy in the general population and among subgroups with a high hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence in France.

METHODS

The Zephyr study was designed as a French, multicentre, prospective, observational study on EBR/GZR use and effectiveness in current practice in chronic hepatitis C patients. These results are based on data regarding the adult patients who received at least one dose of EBR/GZR between December 2017 and June 2019 in 67 French hospitals and clinics.

RESULTS

Overall, 478 patients were included. The Full Analysis Set corresponded to the 467 patients who met all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. Gender was balanced and the mean age was 55.7 ± 13.3 years. The patients were mainly treatment-naive (89.5%) and infected with Genotype 1b (70.4%). Among the 75 patients with HCV Gt1a genotype, 56% had HCV RNA ≥ 800,000 IU/ml. F3-F4 fibrosis stage involved 24.2% of our population. Our subgroups were distributed among 110 migrants (23.6%), 58 (15.3%) using opioid agonist treatment, including people who inject drugs, 30 (6.8%) with chronic kidney disease Stages 3-5, 9 (1.9%) with an inherited blood disorder, and 4 (0.9%) coinfected with HIV. The remaining 269 (58.7%) were included in the general population subgroup. Overall, sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of treatment reached 98.0% and remained consistent among genotype, HCV RNA values, fibrosis stage, and the subgroup of interest. The rate of Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption​​​ and Life Habit questionnaire completion was high at each visit, with data suggesting alcohol consumption decrease and an improvement in quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Using real-world evidence data on a French population representative of HCV patients, we confirmed the results obtained during EBR/GZR development program.

Sustained virological response after treatment with direct antiviral agents in individuals with HIV and hepatitis C co-infection

INTRODUCTION

Randomized trials and observational studies have consistently reported rates of sustained virological response (SVR), equivalent to hepatitis C virus (HCV) cure, as high as 95% following treatment with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment in individuals with HIV and HCV co-infection. However, large studies assessing whether SVR rates differ according to demographic and clinical strata are lacking. Additionally, the SVR rates reported in the literature were typically computed in non-random samples of individuals with available post-DAA HCV-RNA measures. Here, we aimed to estimate the probability of SVR after DAA treatment initiation in persons with HIV and HCV co-infection overall and by demographic and clinical characteristics with and without adjustment for missing HCV-RNA testing.

METHODS

We included adults with HIV-HCV co-infection who received DAA treatment between 2014 and 2020 in HepCAUSAL, an international collaboration of cohorts from Europe and North America. We estimated the proportions of DAA recipients who had documented SVR (defined as an undetectable HCV-RNA at least 12 weeks after the end of DAA treatment) overall and by strata defined by age, sex, presence of cirrhosis, calendar period, mode of HIV acquisition, CD4 cell count and HCV genotype at DAA treatment. We then compared these rates with those obtained using the parametric g-formula to impute SVR status for individuals with no SVR assessment.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 4527 individuals who initiated DAA treatment (88% males, median [IQR] age 56 [50, 62] years) were included. Of the total of 642 (14%) individuals had no HCV-RNA test on or after 12 weeks after the end of treatment. The overall observed and g-formula imputed SVR rates were 93% (95% CI 93, 94) and 94% (95% CI 92, 95), respectively. SVR estimates were similarly high across all strata. A substantial proportion of individuals who received DAA treatment were never assessed for SVR post-DAA and strategies for more systematic routine HCV-RNA testing should be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Our estimates with and without adjustment for missing HCV-RNA testing indicate SVR rates of approximately 95%, like those reported in clinical trials.

The art of managing hepatitis C virus in special population groups: a paradigm shift

The first direct-acting antiviral (DAA) medications were approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in 2011. Later, the appearance of novel DAAs had revolutionized the landscape of HCV treatment whose early treatment options were limited to interferon (IFN) either alone or in combinations. This review discusses the paradigm shift in legibility for treating different groups of patients with HCV after the introduction of DAAs, along with the consequent changes in treatment guidelines. IFN-based therapy was the firstly used for treating chronic HCV. Unfortunately, it exhibited many pitfalls, such as low efficacy in some patients and unsuitability for usage in lots of patients with some specific conditions, which could be comorbidities such as autoimmune thyroiditis, or liver related as in decompensated cirrhosis. Furthermore, IFN failed to treat all the extrahepatic manifestations of HCV. Nowadays, the breakthroughs brought by DAAs have benefited the patients and enabled the treatment of those who could not be treated or did not usually respond well to IFN. DAAs achieve a high success rate of HCV eradication in addition to avoiding unfavorable harms and, sometimes, adverse effects related to the previously used PEGylated IFN regimens.

Effects of direct-acting antiviral treatment on reducing mortality among Medicare beneficiaries with HIV and HCV coinfection

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common among people living with HIV. HIV and HCV coinfected patients have higher overall mortality rates compared with HIV mono-infected patients. With its high cure rate of HCV infection, direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment provides an opportunity to improve the survival of the HIV/HCV coinfected population. The objective of this study is to investigate the association between DAA treatment and all-cause mortality among HIV/HCV coinfected people. The study included 7103 Medicare beneficiaries in the United States who were infected with both HIV and HCV between 2014 and 2017. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of death for patients with and without DAA treatment while controlling for patient characteristics. During the study period, 1675 patients initiated DAA treatment (23.6%). The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of all-cause mortality between patients with and without DAA treatment was 0.37 (95% CI, 0.29-0.48), regardless of cirrhosis status. DAA treatment was associated with a smaller reduction in all-cause mortality for females (aHR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.30-0.85]) compared with males (aHR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.25-0.46]). DAA treatment was associated with improved survival among all HIV/HCV coinfected patients regardless of sex or HCV disease progression.

Health-related quality of life in people receiving opioid agonist treatment and treatment for hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND

In people with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, viral eradication is associated with improved health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

OBJECTIVE

To assess changes in HRQOL among participants receiving opioid agonist therapy undergoing treatment for HCV infection.

METHODS

COSTAR (NCT02251990) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Adults with HCV infection on opioid agonist therapy received elbasvir (50 mg)/grazoprevir (100 mg) or placebo for 12 weeks. HRQOL was evaluated using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) Acute Form. Participants remained blinded until 4 weeks after end of treatment.

RESULTS

Overall, 201 participants received elbasvir/grazoprevir and 100 participants received placebo. Treatment difference mean change from baseline scores (elbasvir/grazoprevir minus placebo) indicated an improvement in HRQOL at 4 weeks after end of treatment in participants receiving elbasvir/grazoprevir versus those receiving placebo, driven by declining HRQOL in those receiving placebo and improved HRQOL in certain domains among participants receiving elbasvir/grazoprevir. Notable differences in SF-36v2 scores were evident in the general health (mean treatment difference [MTD], 6.00; 95% CI, 1.37-10.63), vitality (MTD, 6.81; 95% CI, 1.88-11.75), and mental health (MTD, 5.17; 95% CI, 0.52-9.82) domains and in the mental component summary score (mean, 2.83; 95% CI, 0.29-5.37). No notable between-treatment differences were evident at treatment weeks 4 or 12.

CONCLUSION

HRQOL in patients receiving medication for opioid dependence was improved following treatment for HCV infection with elbasvir/grazoprevir, suggesting that eradication of HCV infection with direct-acting antivirals is associated with improved HRQOL.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02251990.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in people with opioid use disorder: a real-world study of elbasvir/grazoprevir in a US Department of Veterans Affairs population

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in the United States have increased in recent years, with the most rapid rise among people who inject drugs (PWIDs). Historically, there have been concerns regarding treatment adherence among PWIDs with HCV infection, leading to undertreatment of this population and increased HCV transmission. Elbasvir (EBR)/grazoprevir (GZR) has demonstrated high rates of virologic cure (sustained virologic response [SVR]) in clinical trials enrolling PWIDs with HCV infection. Objective: To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of EBR/GZR in HCV genotype (GT) 1-infected patients with a diagnosis of opioid use disorder. Methods: A retrospective analysis of electronic medical records from the US Department of Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse. Adults with chronic HCV GT1 infection, ≥1 prescription for EBR/GZR, and ≥1 clinic visit were included. All patients had ≥1 ICD-9/10 code of opioid use disorder. SVR was the primary outcome. Results: 419 patients were included; 97.1% had a history of any illicit drug use and 40.8% were receiving medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). SVR was achieved by 96.9% (406/419) of all patients, 97.0% (350/361) of those receiving EBR/GZR for 12 weeks, and 95.3% (163/171) of those receiving MOUD. SVR in patients receiving psychiatric medications ranged from 96.1% (221/230) in those taking antidepressant medications to 98.5% (128/130) in those taking mood stabilizers. Conclusion: In this real-world setting, high rates of virologic cure were achieved in patients with HCV GT1 infection on MOUD receiving EBR/GZR for 12 weeks, including patients with multiple comorbidities and high rate of psychiatric medication use.

Enhanced safety and efficacy of protease-regulated CAR-T cell receptors

Regulatable CAR platforms could circumvent toxicities associated with CAR-T therapy, but existing systems have shortcomings including leakiness and attenuated activity. Here, we present SNIP CARs, a protease-based platform for regulating CAR activity using an FDA-approved small molecule. Design iterations yielded CAR-T cells that manifest full functional capacity with drug and no leaky activity in the absence of drug. In numerous models, SNIP CAR-T cells were more potent than constitutive CAR-T cells and showed diminished T cell exhaustion and greater stemness. In a ROR1-based CAR lethality model, drug cessation following toxicity onset reversed toxicity, thereby credentialing the platform as a safety switch. In the same model, reduced drug dosing opened a therapeutic window that resulted in tumor eradication in the absence of toxicity. SNIP CARs enable remote tuning of CAR activity, which provides solutions to safety and efficacy barriers that are currently limiting progress in using CAR-T cells to treat solid tumors.

Evaluation of the hepatitis C cascade of care among people living with HIV in New South Wales, Australia: A data linkage study

People living with HIV (PLHIV) are a priority population to receive hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening and treatment. We aimed to characterize the HCV care cascade among PLHIV between 2010 and 2018 and to compare HCV testing and treatment uptake pre- and post-availability of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Records of all HCV notifications (1993-2017) were linked to HIV notifications, deaths, hospitalizations, incarcerations, opioid agonist therapy, HCV RNA testing and treatment databases. Numbers and proportions were calculated for all stages of the care cascade and factors associated with HCV testing, and DAA treatment uptake were evaluated using logistic regression. From 383 individuals with HCV notification (2009-2017), 349 (91%) were ever HCV RNA tested, 285 (74%) had an indicator of chronic HCV infection, and from those eligible for treatment, 210 (74%) received HCV treatment. HCV testing was recorded for 85% pre-DAA era and reached a cumulative proportion of 90% post-DAA while treatment uptake had a 10-fold increase from 7% pre- to 73% post-DAA era. Younger age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.98; 95% CI 0.96-0.99), female gender (aOR 1.87; 95% CI 1.10-3.19), and rural region residence at notification (aOR 1.56; 95% CI 1.03-2.36) were associated with not receiving HCV testing. No identified factor was associated with not receiving treatment post-DAA era. Removing barriers to HCV testing, expanding treatment to a variety of settings and continuous education and harm reduction are essential to achieve HCV elimination among PLHIV in Australia.

Real-world effectiveness of direct-acting antivirals in people living with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus genotype 6 infections

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 6 (HCV-6) infection is prevalent predominantly in Southeast Asia, and the data on the virologic response of HCV-6 to direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are sparse in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PLWH).

AIM

To assess the virologic response of HCV-6 to DAAs in PLWH.

METHODS

From September 2016 to July 2019, PLWH coinfected with HCV-6 initiating DAAs were included. Laboratory investigations were performed at baseline, the end of treatment, and 12 wk off-therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 349 PLWH included (mean age 48.9 years, 82.5% men), 80.5% comprised people who inject drugs, 18.1% men who have sex with men, and 1.4% heterosexuals. Coexistent hepatitis B virus infection was present in 12.3% of the included PLWH, liver cirrhosis 10.9%, hepatocellular carcinoma 0.9%, and previous HCV treatment experience 10.9%. The mean baseline plasma HCV RNA was 6.2 log₁₀ IU/mL. Treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was initiated in 51.9%, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir 41.5%, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir 6.3%, and sofosbuvir/daclatasvir 0.3%. At DAA initiation, antiretroviral therapy containing tenofovir alafenamide was given in 26.4%, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 34.4%, non-tenofovir alafenamide/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 39.3%, non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors 30.4%, protease inhibitors 4.0%, and integrase strand transfer inhibitors 66.8%; 94.8% of the included patients had CD4 counts ≥ 200 cells/mm³ and 96.0% had plasma HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL. Overall, 96.8% achieved undetectable plasma HCV RNA (< 30 IU/mL) at end of treatment; and 92.3% achieved sustained virologic response 12 wk off-therapy in the intention-to-treat analysis (93.5% in patients receiving sofosbuvir-based DAAs and 91.2% in those receiving glecaprevir/pibrentasvir).

CONCLUSION

Similar to the observation made in HIV-negative patients, sustained virologic response 12 wk off-therapy with DAAs is high in PLWH coinfected with HCV-6.

Comparison of the Efficacies of Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment for HCV Infection in People Who Inject Drugs and Non-Drug Users

Background and Objectives: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major cause of liver disease worldwide. People who inject drugs (PWIDs) constitute the majority of patients with HCV infection in the United States and Central Asia. There are several obstacles to treating HCV infection in PWIDs because PWIDs are often accompanied by concurrent infection, low compliance, substance abuse, and risky behavior. The aim of the study is to compare the efficacies of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for HCV infection in PWIDs and those without opioid injection. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included 53 PWIDs with HCV infections treated on site in a methadone program and 106 age- and sex-matched patients with HCV infections who had no history of opioid injection (ratio of 1:2). All eligible subjects received anti-HCV treatment by DAA agents in our hospital from March 2018 to December 2020. The charts of these patients were carefully reviewed for demographic data, types of DAA agents, and treatment outcomes. The primary outcome measure was sustained virological response (SVR). Results: PWIDs and non-drug users had different HCV genotype profiles (p = 0.013). The former had higher proportions of genotype 3 (18.9% vs. 7.5%) and genotype 6 (24.5% vs. 14.2%) than the latter. The two patient groups had comparable rates of complete drug refilling (100.0% vs. 91.1%) and frequency of loss to follow-up (3.8% vs. 0.9%). However, PWIDs had a lower SVR rate of DAA treatment than non-drug users (92.2% vs. 99.0%; p = 0.04). Further analysis showed that both human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection and history of PWID were risk factors associated with treatment failure. The subjects with coinfection with HIV had lower SVR rates than those without HIV infection (50.0% vs. 96.5%; p = 0.021). Conclusions: PWIDs with HCV infections have higher proportions of HCV genotype 3 and genotype 6 than non-drug users with infections. DAA therapy can achieve a high cure rate (>90%) for HCV infection in PWID, but its efficacy in PWID is lower than that in non-drug users.

Risk of HIV viral rebound in HIV infected patients on direct acting antivirals (DAAs) treatment for HCV

Background

The dynamic of HIV-viral load (VL) remains poorly investigated in HIV/HCV patients under direct acting antivirals (DAAs).

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated HIV-VL at baseline (BL) during and up to 24 weeks post-DAAs in a cohort of 305 HIV-1/HCV patients, on ART and with no HIV virological failure (VF) in the 6 months before treatment with DAAs; during the period of observation VF was defined as confirmed VL≥50 copies/mL; virological blips (VB, transient, not confirmed, VL ≥50 copies/mL). Stepwise Cox regression models were fitted to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) of VF.

Results

Fifteen VF occurred in 13 patients over 187 person-years of follow-up (PYFU): incidence rate (IR) of 8.0 per 100-PYFU (95% CI = 4.0–12.1); 29 VBs were detected in 26 patients over 184 PYFU: IR = 15.8 per 100-PYFU (95% CI = 10.0–21.5). The most prominent factor associated with VF was the presence of BL HIV residual viremia (RV = HIV-RNA detectable but not precisely quantifiable) [aHR = 12.26 (95% CI = 3.74–40.17), P<0.0001]. Other factors were ≥1 VBs in the 6 months before DAAs [aHR = 6.95 (95% CI = 1.77–27.37) P = 0.006] number of ART regimens failed before DAAs initiation [aHR (per more regimen) = 1.22 (95% CI = 1.04–1.42), P = 0.012] and age [aHR (per year older) = 1.16 (95% CI = 1.04–1.29), P = 0.010].

Conclusions

Our findings underline the importance for close monitoring HIV-VL in selected patients. Whether this phenomenon is triggered by the rapid clearance of HCV remains to be established.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Reinfection with HCV after Treatment in People Living with HIV

Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) does not induce protective immunity, and re-exposure to HCV can reinfect the population engaging in high-risk behavior. An increasing incidence of acute hepatitis C infection in people living with HIV (PLWH) has been described in recent years. This retrospective cohort study was conducted in PLWH who completed HCV therapy between June 2009 and June 2020 at an HIV care hospital, to analyze their basic characteristics and risky behavior. Of 2419 patients, 639 were diagnosed with HCV infection and 516 completed the HCV therapy with a sustained virologic response. In total, 59 patients (11.4%) were reinfected with acute hepatitis C, and the median time to reinfection was 85.3 weeks (IQR: 57–150). The incidence of reinfection was 6.7 cases/100 person-years. The factors associated with reinfection were being male (AHR, 8.02; 95% CI 1.08–59.49), DAA (direct-acting antiviral) treatment (AHR, 2.23; 95% CI 1.04–4.79), liver cirrhosis (AHR, 3.94; 95% CI 1.09–14.22), heroin dependency (AHR: 7.41; 95% CI 3.37–14.3), and HIV viral loads <50 copies/mL at the follow-up (AHR: 0.47, 95% CI 0.24–0.93) in the subgroup of people who inject drugs (PWID). Amphetamine abuse (AHR: 20.17; 95% CI 2.36–172.52) was the dominant factor in the subgroup of men who have sex with men (MSM). Our study suggests that education and behavioral interventions are needed in this population to prevent reinfection.

Pangenotypic and Genotype-Specific Antivirals in the Treatment of HCV Genotype 4 Infected Patients with HCV Monoinfection and HIV/HCV Coinfection

The introduction of the direct-acting antivirals (DAA) has substantially improved the effectiveness of the therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. We aimed to compare the efficacy of pangenotypic and genotype-specific DAA in the cohort of genotype (GT) four patients with HCV monoinfection and HIV coinfection. A total of 662 GT4-infected patients treated in 2015–2020—of whom 168 (25.3%) were coinfected with HIV, selected from the retrospective EpiTer-2 database—were enrolled in the analysis. Among HIV-coinfected patients, 54% (90) were treated with genotype-specific regimens and 46% (78) with pangenotypic options, while among HCV-monoinfected patients, the rates were 72% and 28%, respectively. Significantly higher rate of males (67.9% vs. 57.7%, p = 0.01), a lower rate of liver cirrhosis (10.2% vs. 18.1%, p = 0.02), and higher of treatment-naïve patients (87.5% vs. 76.7%, p = 0.003) were documented in the HIV coinfected population. The overall sustained virologic response after exclusion of non-virologic failures was achieved in 98% with no significant difference between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients, 96.2% vs. 98.5%, respectively. While the genotype-specific regimens resulted in a similar cure rate regardless of the HIV status, the pangenotypic options were more efficacious in patients with HCV monoinfection (99.3% vs. 94.4%, p = 0.05). Hereby, we demonstrated the high effectiveness and good safety profile of the DAA therapy in the population of HCV GT4 infected patients with HIV coinfection supporting the current recommendations to treat HCV/HIV coinfected patients with the same options as those with HCV monoinfection.

Single-pill sofosbuvir and daclatasvir for treating hepatis C in patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus

BACKGROUND

The current recommendation for treating hepatitis C virus (HCV) in HIV patients includes the combination of sofosbuvir (SOF) and daclatasvir (DCV). DCV should be used at different doses to compensate for interactions with antiretroviral therapy (ART). Up to three pills a day might be required which will significantly add to the pill burden of these patients. In this study, we have used a single-tablet approach to treating HCV-HIV coinfection.

METHODS

Patients coinfected with HIV and HCV were prospectively enrolled from 10 centers throughout the country. Patients received a single once-daily fixed dose combination (FDC) pill containing 400 mg SOF and 30, 60 or 90 mg DCV depending on the type of ART they were receiving for 12 or 24 weeks. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03369327).

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-three patients were enrolled from 10 centers. Twenty-three patients were lost to follow-up and two patients died from causes unrelated to treatment. Two hundred eight patients completed the treatment course of which 201 achieved SVR (96.6%).

CONCLUSION

Single-tablet combination of DCV and SOF is an effective and safe treatment for patients coinfected with HIV and HCV. The combination works well in patients on ART in which dose adjustment is required. Patients with cirrhosis, previous treatment failure and various genotypes respond identically. The expenses of genotyping can be saved.

Elbasvir/grazoprevir is effective and tolerable for the treatment of HCV GT1-infected patients: A real world multicenter observatory study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) by elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) was found to be efficacious and well tolerated in clinical trials. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of EBR/GZR in the treatment of HCV genotype 1-infected Taiwanese patients.

METHODS

Chronic hepatitis C patients infected with GT1b or 1a without resistance-associated substitution, and treated with 12-week EBR/GZR were enrolled from 10 hospitals in Taiwan between August 2017 and December 2018. All clinical and virologic data were collected at each participating center. Primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response at week 12 (SVR12) after end of the EBR/GZR therapy, assessed in the per-protocol population, which excluded patients with important deviations from the protocol. Analysis was also performed based on the modified full analysis set, which included all allocated patients receiving at least 4-week medication. Virologic failure was recorded as breakthrough, nonresponse, or relapse. Safety was assessed through collection of adverse events, physical examination, vital signs, and standard laboratory evaluations.

RESULTS

Per protocol SVR12 rates were 99.5% (1169/1175) for all HCV genotype 1 patients. Among patients with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney diseases, 100% (107/107) achieved SVR12. In univariate analyses, variables associated with SVR12 were treatment termination (P < 0.0001) and treatment adherence (P < 0.0001) in the mFAS population. Overall, 22.3% of the patients experienced adverse events during treatment. Seven patients did not complete the treatment, five due to liver-unrelated deaths, one due to adverse event and one due to epilepsy.

CONCLUSIONS

EBR/GZR treatment was highly effective and well tolerated.

Current treatment for hepatitis C virus/human immunodeficiency virus coinfection in adults

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection is a major problem among HIV-infected patients, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality rates due to the acceleration of liver fibrosis progression by HIV, leading to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although the efficacy of direct-acting antiviral therapy in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection and HCV monoinfection are similar in terms of sustained virologic response rate, there are some additional complications that arise in the treatment of patients with HIV/HCV coinfection, including drug-drug interactions and HCV reinfection due to the high risk behavior of these patients. This review will summarize the current management of HIV/HCV coinfection.

Pharmacokinetics and renal safety of tenofovir alafenamide with boosted protease inhibitors and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir

BACKGROUND

Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir increases tenofovir plasma exposures by up to 98% with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and exposures are highest with boosted PIs. There are currently no data on the combined use of the newer tenofovir prodrug, tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), boosted PIs and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics and renal safety of TAF with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir when co-administered with boosted PIs.

METHODS

Persons with HIV between 18 and 70 years and on a boosted PI with TDF were eligible. The study was comprised of four phases: (1) TDF 300 mg with boosted PI; (2) TAF 25 mg with boosted PI; (3) TAF 25 mg with boosted PI and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir; and (4) TAF 25 mg with boosted PI. Pharmacokinetic sampling, urine biomarker collection [urine protein (UPCR), retinol binding protein (RBP) and β2 microglobulin (β2M) normalized to creatinine] and safety assessments occurred at the end of each phase. Plasma, PBMCs and dried blood spots were collected at each visit.

RESULTS

Ten participants were enrolled. Plasma tenofovir exposures were 76% lower and tenofovir-diphosphate (TFV-DP) concentrations in PBMCs increased 9.9-fold following the switch to TAF. Neither of these measures significantly increased with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir co-administration, nor did TAF plasma concentrations. No significant changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate or UPCR occurred, but RBP:creatinine and β2M:creatinine improved following the switch to TAF.

CONCLUSIONS

Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir did not significantly increase plasma tenofovir or intracellular TFV-DP in PBMCs with TAF. These findings provide reassurance that the combination of TAF, boosted PIs and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir is safe in HIV/HCV-coinfected populations.

Grazoprevir/elbasvir for the immediate treatment of recently acquired HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection in MSM

BACKGROUND

In Europe, increases in HCV infection have been observed over the last two decades in MSM, making them a key population for recently acquired HCV. Alternative combinations of direct-acting antiviral agents against early HCV infection need to be assessed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this pilot trial, MSM with recently acquired genotype 1 or 4 HCV infection were prospectively included and received 8 weeks of oral grazoprevir 100 mg and elbasvir 50 mg in a fixed-dose combination administered once daily. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response evaluated 12 weeks after the end of treatment (EOT) (SVR12). Secondary endpoints were the virological characterization of failures, the quality of life before, during and after treatment and the rate of reinfection.

RESULTS

In a 15 month period, 30 patients were enrolled, all of whom were MSM. Of the 29 patients completing follow-up, 28 (96%, 95% CI = 82%-99%) achieved SVR12. One patient interrupted follow-up (suicide) but had undetectable plasma HCV RNA at EOT. One patient with suboptimal adherence confirmed by plasma drug monitoring relapsed and developed NS3, NS5A and NS5B resistance-associated substitutions (V36M, M28V and S556G). The most common adverse events related to study drug were diarrhoea (n = 4, 13%), insomnia (n = 2, 7%) and fatigue (n = 2, 7%), although no patient discontinued treatment. No HIV RNA breakthrough was reported in the 28 patients with HIV coinfection. At Week 48, reinfection was diagnosed in three patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the use of grazoprevir/elbasvir for immediate treatment against HCV in order to reduce HCV transmission in MSM.

Treatment with Grazoprevir/Elbasvir in Post-kidney Transplant Patients with Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 4 Infection

Background: Kidney transplant (KT) recipients have a high rate of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, which can impact long-term graft and patient survival rates. Although direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are effective for treating HCV, there is limited data on their use in post-KT patients with HCV genotype 4 infection. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and occurrence of adverse events with grazoprevir/elbasvir combination treatment without ribavirin in post-KT patients with HCV genotype 4 infection. Methods: In this case series, nine therapy-naïve adult post-KT patients with HCV genotype 4 infection were recruited. They had stable graft function and received a fixed dose of grazoprevir/elbasvir (50 mg/100 mg) combination without ribavirin daily for 12 weeks. Patients co-infected with hepatitis B virus, HIV, or with evidence of decompensated liver disease were excluded from the study. Patients were monitored for viral load, laboratory values, and adverse events associated with drug treatment. The response was defined by the sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12) after the end of treatment. Results: All nine patients completed the treatment period and achieved SVR12 with no treatment failure or relapse. Of them, six patients had HCV genotype 4 infection alone, and three had HCV of mixed genotypes 1 and 4. Two (22%) patients showed a rapid HCV clearance at four weeks. No adverse events or serious adverse events were reported. The patients’ renal function was stable during and after the treatment with no deterioration of graft function, and no adjustments to the immunosuppressive therapy were required. Conclusions: Grazoprevir/elbasvir combination without ribavirin is an effective and safe treatment option for post-KT patients with genotype 4 HCV infection.

Management and Treatment of Hepatitis C: Are There Still Unsolved Problems and Unique Populations?

Direct-acting antivirals (DAA) have revolutionized the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, possibly leading to HCV elimination by 2030 as endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO). However, some patients belonging to the so-called unique or special populations are referred to as difficult-to-treat due to unreached sustained virological response, potential drug side effects or interactions or co-morbidities. Several years after the DAA introduction and on the basis of excellent findings in terms of efficacy and safety, some doubts arise around the exact meaning of the special population designation and whether this group of patients actually exists. The aim of this review is to discuss and analyze current evidence on the management and treatment of the so-called "unique populations". We placed particular emphasis on patients with decompensated cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease (CKD), coinfections, rare genotypes, and previous treatment failure, in order to provide physicians with an updated overview of the actual problems and needs in the current scenario.

Impact of recent drug use on the efficacy of elbasvir/grazoprevir for HCV-infected people on opioid agonist therapy

Elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) use in drug users on opiate agonist therapy (OAT) is supported by the C-EDGE Co-STAR trial. SVR rates in this study were within those found in the rest of patients included by the EBR/GZR development programme. In clinical practice, however, efficacy could theoretically be lower. Thus, we aimed at evaluating the SVR rates of EBR/GZR among people who injected drugs (PWID) with and without OAT in clinical practice. Patients starting EBR/GZR included in the HEPAVIR-DAA (NCT02057003), recruiting HIV/HCV-coinfected patients or the GEHEP-MONO (NCT02333292), including HCV-monoinfected individuals, prospective cohorts were analysed. Overall SVR12 (ITT), discontinuations due to adverse effects and drop-outs were evaluated. The same analysis was carried out for PWID with and without OAT. 336 patients had started EBR/GZR and reached the SVR12 evaluation date. 318 [95%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 92%-98%] patients achieved SVR12. SVR12 was 97% (95% CI: 93%-99%, n/N = 141/145) among people who never used injecting drugs, 94% (95% CI: 88%-97%, n/N = 117/125) among PWIDs without OAT and 91% (95% CI: 81%-97%, n/N = 60/66) among PWIDs with OAT (p = 0.134). Five (1.5%) patients showed relapses, and two (0.6%) individuals showed viral breakthrough. The SVR12 rate for recent drug users was 69% (n/N = 18/26) compared with 97% (n/N = 276/284) for individuals without recent drug use (in the prior year) (p < 0.001). Among recent drug users, three (12%) showed relapses, and five (19%) were lost-to-follow-up. The SVR rates achieved with EBR/GZR were high in real-world conditions of use. However, PWID with recent drug use reach suboptimal response rates with EBR/GZR.

Breakthroughs and challenges in the management of pediatric viral hepatitis

Chronic infections by hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) major causes of advanced liver disease and mortality worldwide. Although regarded as benign infections in children, their persistence through adulthood is undoubtedly of concern. Recent advances in HCV treatment have restored the visibility of these conditions and raised expectations for HBV treatment, which is currently far from being curative. Herein we describe direct-acting antivirals available for pediatric HCV (sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir) and their real-world use. A critical review of the HBV pediatric classification is provided. Anti-HBV investigational compounds are reviewed in light of the pathophysiology in the pediatric population, including capsid assembly modulators, antigen secretion inhibitors, silencing RNAs, and immune modifiers. Recommendations for screening and management of immunosuppressed children or those with other risk factors or comorbidities are also summarized.

Blinding in Clinical Trials for Chronic Liver Diseases

Within the field of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), the randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial is considered the most efficient means of simultaneously assessing the efficacy and safety of a medical therapy in a single trial. While many RCTs are conducted without blinding (open label), it is rare to encounter a blinded trial that does not randomize its subjects. Clinical trials for chronic liver diseases have adopted many of the practices set forth by RCTs in other chronic diseases, but blinding has often been difficult to properly implement. This review examines the rationale for blinding, common challenges to successful blinding, different mechanisms of unintentional unblinding in clinical trials for viral hepatitis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and recommendations for blinding and design in future trials of treatments for liver disease.

HCV Seroprevalence among HIV Patients and Associated Comorbidities at One Primary Health Facility in Rwanda

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV have emerged as major viral infections within the past two decades, and their coinfection poses a big challenge with a significant impact in terms of morbidity and mortality associated with liver disease and renal failure. The current study aimed at assessing the prevalence of HCV infection and associated comorbidities among HIV patients at one primary health facility in Rwanda. In total, 417 HIV-positive patients were recruited and included in the study from January 1, 2019 up to June 30, 2019. All participants were screened for HCV infection by using the SD Bioline HCV antibody rapid test. In addition, underlying medical conditions were also recorded as comorbidities. Among 417 participants, 52 exhibited HCV-positive results (12.5%). The group of 41- to 50- and 51- to 60-year-olds had higher prevalence of HIV/HCV coinfection than other age-groups with 3.6% and 4.6%, respectively. Furthermore, five underlying medical conditions were found as comorbidities among the study participants. Those with HIV/HCV coinfection showed higher comorbidities than those with mono-infection including liver toxicity, P value 0.005; tuberculosis, P value 0.005; renal failure, P value 0.003; hypertension, P value 0.001; and diabetes mellitus, P value 0.001. The relative risk ratio of having comorbidities in those groups was 4.09. To conclude, the prevalence of HCV/HIV coinfection is high, and there was a statistical significant association of having comorbidities in HIV/HCV-coinfected group compared with the group of HIV mono-infection, which suggests more intervention in this vulnerable group of patients.

Well tolerability and highly effective treatment response for hepatitis C virus-human immunodeficiency virus-coinfected patients treated by all-oral direct-acting antivirals

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection is common because the two pathogens share their transmission route. Studies have suggested that coinfection is associated with accelerated hepatic fibrosis, increased hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma development. Historically, the sustained virological response (SVR) rates for patients undergoing pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)-based therapy are poor owing to advanced liver disease, immune dysfunction, and poor medical adherence. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of oral direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in HCV-HIV-coinfected patients.

METHODS

Between January 2017 and February 2020, 52 consecutive HCV-HIV-coinfected patients treated with oral DAAs (paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir: 7; daclatasvir and asunaprevir: 1; glecaprevir and pibrentasvir: 15; and sofosbuvir-based drugs: 29) were enrolled. The DAA regimen was selected based on the genotype/subtypes, patient characteristics, potential drug-drug interaction profiles, and health insurance reimbursement criteria. SVR12 was defined as undetectable HCV RNA (<15 IU/mL) at the end of therapy and 12 weeks after therapy completion.

RESULTS

The mean age of the enrolled patients was 42 ± 10.2 years; 92.3% of the patients were male and 32.7% had advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. Nine (17.3%) patients had failed previous IFN therapy. The genotype distribution was as follows: 1a: 8; 1b: 23; 2: 14; 3: 1; and 6: 6. The baseline HCV RNA level before DAA administration was 6.56 ± 0.9 log10 IU/mL, and 67.3% of patients had baseline HCV RNA >2 000 000 IU/mL. After posttreatment follow-up, all 52 patients (100%) achieved SVR12. Subjective and laboratory adverse events during therapy were generally mild, and none of the patients terminated therapy early.

CONCLUSION

A highly effective treatment response and good tolerability were achieved using the oral DAAs for the HCV-HIV-coinfected patient population, which has been considered difficult to treat using IFN-based therapy in the past with urgent unmet medical needs.

Recent advances in the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection for special populations and remaining problems

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is one of the primary causes of liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and liver transplantation (LT). The rate of HCV infection is high in patients on hemodialysis and in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). In liver transplant patients with HCV infection, recurrent HCV infection of the transplanted liver is universal and results in rapid liver fibrosis progression. In patients with HCV/HIV coinfection as well, liver fibrosis advances rapidly. Thus, there is an urgent need for prompt HCV infection treatment in these special populations (i.e. HIV/HCV coinfection, HCV infection after LT, and dialysis patients). Interferon (IFN)-based therapy for HCV infection could not achieve a high rate of sustained viral response and could cause severe adverse events in the aforementioned special populations. Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have recently been developed, and clinical trials have shown that IFN-free DAA-based therapies are associated with a significantly better safety and therapeutic profile than IFN-based therapies. However, the majority of the initial DAA trials excluded special populations; thus, the efficacy and safety of IFN-free DAA-based therapy in special populations remained to be clearly established. Although recent clinical trials and clinical studies have shown the high efficacy and safety of this therapy even in special populations, several unresolved problems, including emergence of resistance-associated variants after failure to respond to DAAs and HCC occurrence after DAA therapy, still exist. Hence, in this review, we discuss the recent advances in anti-HCV therapy for special populations and the remaining problems regarding this therapy.

A Review of Chronic Comorbidities in Adults Living With HIV: State of the Science

ABSTRACT

People living with HIV are living longer, high-quality lives; however, as they age, this population is at increased risk for developing chronic comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease, certain types of cancer (e.g., lung, anal, and liver), and diabetes mellitus. The purpose of this state-of-the-science review is to provide an evidence-based summary on common physical comorbidities experienced by people living and aging with HIV. We focus on those chronic conditions that are prevalent and growing and share behavioral risk factors that are common in people living with HIV. We will discuss the current evidence on the epidemiology, physiology, prevention strategies, screening, and treatment options for people living with HIV across resource settings.

Predictors of hepatitis C treatment outcomes in a harm reduction-focused primary care program in New York City

Background

The social determinants of health that influence steps in the entire Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) treatment cascade must be identified to achieve HCV elimination goals. This project aimed to evaluate the association of these factors with HCV treatment completion and return for sustained virologic response (SVR) testing.

Methods

We used retrospective cohort data from our primary care-based HCV treatment program that provides comprehensive harm reduction care to those who use or formerly used drugs. Among persons who began direct-acting antiviral HCV treatment between December 2014 and March 2018, we identified two outcomes: HCV treatment completion and return for SVR assessment 12 weeks after treatment end. Several predictors were ascertained including sociodemographic information, substance use, psychiatric symptoms and history, housing instability, and HCV treatment regimen. We then evaluated associations between predictors and outcomes using univariate and multivariable statistical methods.

Results

From a cohort of 329 patients treated in an urban primary care center, multivariable analysis identified housing instability as a single significant predictor for HCV treatment completion (odds ratio [OR]: 0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1–0.9). Among patients completing treatment, 226 (75%) returned for SVR assessment; the sole predictor of this outcome was Medicaid as primary insurance (compared to other insurances; OR 0.3; 0.1–0.7).

Conclusions

Innovative strategies to help unstably housed persons complete HCV treatment are urgently needed in order to reach HCV elimination targets. Educational and motivational strategies should be developed to promote individuals with Medicaid in particular to return for SVR viral load testing, a critical post-treatment component of the HCV treatment cascade.

Trial registration Not applicable.

Baseline Hepatitis C Virus NS5A Resistance-Associated Polymorphisms in Patients With and Without Human Immunodeficiency Virus Coinfection in Mexico

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the frequency and associated factors of baseline NS5A resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) monoinfection with genotype 1b (GT1b) or genotype 1a (GT1a). Moreover, we performed a phylogenetic analysis to evaluate the pattern of clustering among samples of patients with RASs. Results: Fifty-five patients were infected with GT1a, of whom 44 (80%) were HIV-infected patients. RAS prevalence in GT1a was 14% (6/44) and distributed as follows: 5 (11%) harbored M28V and 1 (2%) A92T. Twenty-four patients were infected with HCV GT1b, of whom only 5 (21%) were HIV coinfected; RASs were found in 17/24 (71%) patients, as follows: Y93H+F37L+Q54H (1/24), Y93H+F37L (1/24), P58S (1/24), L31F+F37L (1/24), F37L+H/Q54H (3/24), and F37L (10/24). Only GT1b was significantly associated with RASs (adjusted odds ratio 16.37; 95% confidence interval 2.74-97.48; p = 0.002) in the multivariate analysis. A cluster of sequences from HIV/HCV GT1a patients was found; however, we did not find phylogenetic relationships among sequences with NS5A RASs. Conclusions: In our population of HCV-infected patients, the frequency of NS5A RASs at baseline was somewhat similar to the previously reported worldwide rate. HCV GT1b showed the most significant association with harboring of NS5A RASs. Of note, despite there being clusters among sequences of HIV-coinfected patients, NS5A RASs were not transmitted.

Utilization and effectiveness of elbasvir/grazoprevir and adoption of resistance-associated substitutions testing in real-world treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 1A infection: results from the German Hepatitis C-Registry

BACKGROUND

For treatment of genotype 1a (GT1a) infection with elbasvir/grazoprevir, the German guidelines recommend a differentiated approach depending on baseline viral load (BVL). For low BVL ≤800 000 IU/mL, treatment with 12 weeks elbasvir/grazoprevir should be considered, whereas for high BVL >800 000 IU/mL, this regimen is only recommended in nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) absence. With present NS5A RAS or when RAS-testing is not available, 16 weeks elbasvir/grazoprevir + ribavirin is preferred. Here, we investigated the adherence to these recommendations and the effectiveness of elbasvir/grazoprevir in a large German Hepatitis C-Registry GT1a cohort.

METHODS

From September 2016 until July 2018, 195 GT1a-infected patients were treated with elbasvir/grazoprevir ± ribavirin for 12-16 weeks. The primary outcome was per protocol SVR12 or SVR24.

RESULTS

Mean age was 50 years, 89% were male, 19% had cirrhosis, 72% were treatment-naïve. Forty-five percent had low BVL ≤800 000 IU/mL, 55% high BVL >800 000 IU/mL, of whom 49 vs. 42% were baseline RAS-tested. Four patients with high (7.7%) and two with low BVL (5%) had NS5A RAS of whom 50% received elbasvir/grazoprevir+ribavirin, respectively. Ninety-four percent of patients with low and 65% with high BVL received elbasvir/grazoprevir without ribavirin. Thirty-five percent of patients with high BVL received ribavirin, mostly without prior RAS-testing. Per protocol sustained virologic response (SVR) by low vs. high BVL was 98.8 and 95.1%. All patients with NS5A RAS achieved SVR.

CONCLUSIONS

In German, real-world most patients received elbasvir/grazoprevir without ribavirin. Ribavirin was mainly added in GT1a patients >800 000 IU/mL, who were not NS5A RAS tested. SVR rates were consistently high and comparable to clinical trial results.

Effectiveness and Safety of Interferon-Free Direct-Acting Antiviral Hepatitis C Virus Therapy in HIV/Hepatitis C Virus Coinfected Individuals: Results From a Pan-European Study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effectiveness, safety, and reasons for premature discontinuation of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in a diverse population of HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfected individuals in Europe.

METHODS

All HIV/HCV coinfected individuals in the EuroSIDA study that started interferon free DAA treatment between January 6, 2014, and January 3, 2018, with ≥12 weeks of follow-up after treatment stop were included in this analysis. Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as a negative HCV-RNA result ≥12 weeks after stopping treatment (SVR12). Logistic regression was used to explore factors associated with SVR12.

RESULTS

1042 individuals started interferon-free DAA treatment after 1/6/2014 and were included, 862 (82.2%) had a known response to treatment, and 789 [91.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 89.7 to 93.4] of which achieved SVR12. There were no differences in SVR12 across regions of Europe (P = 0.84). After adjustment, the odds of achieving SVR12 was lower in individuals that received sofosbuvir/simeprevir ± ribavirin (RBV) [adjusted odds ratio 0.21 (95% CI: 0.08 to 0.53)] or ombitasvir/paritaprevir/dasabuvir ± RBV [adjusted odds ratio 0.46 (95% CI: 0.22 to 1.00)] compared with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir ± RBV. Forty-three (4.6%) individuals had one or more components of their HCV regimen stopped early, most commonly because of toxicity (n = 14); of these 14, 11 were treated with ribavirin. Increased bilirubin was the most common grade 3 or 4 laboratory adverse event (n = 15.3%) and was related to treatment with atazanavir and ribavirin.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings from real-world data on HIV/HCV coinfected individuals across Europe show DAA treatment is well tolerated and that high rates of SVR12 can be achieved in all regions of Europe.

Drug-Drug Interactions of Newly Approved Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents in Patients with Hepatitis C

Hepatitis C is a major health problem worldwide, frequently resulting in cirrhosis and increasing the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma significantly. In recent years, the advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has dramatically improved the therapeutic outcomes in hepatitis C patients. In the last two years, several new DAA combinations have been approved for the treatment of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, including elbasvir/grazoprevir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir, and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. The newly approved DAA regimens may be prescribed with other drugs simultaneously, increasing the potential of pharmacokinetic interactions. Therefore, the knowledge and management of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with DAAs should be considered a key issue in HCV therapy. This review summarizes researches of DDIs focusing on newly approved DAAs (elbasvir, grazoprevir, velpatasvir, voxilaprevir, glecaprevir, pibrentasvir) for patients undergoing HCV treatment to provide clinical consideration for comedication. With respect to DDIs, newly approved DAA regimens, including elbasvir/grazoprevir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir, and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, are safely applicable.

Prevention of Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Liver Cancer

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most prevalent cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide.

Elbasvir and grazoprevir for the treatment of hepatitis C

Introduction: Hepatitis C is one of the leading causes of chronic liver disease. The direct-acting-antivirals has revolutionized the chronic hepatitis C treatment. DAAs can achieve a sustained virological response rate >95% in different populations.Area covered: This review summarizes the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir (EBR/GZR).Expert opinion: EBR/GZR is a combination of NS5A and NS3/4A inhibitors. The performance in the EBR/GZR combination's safety and tolerability is appreciated in clinical treatment. EBR/GZR also has a higher barrier to resistance-associated substitutions. Based on clinical trials and real-world experience, elbasvir/grazoprevir is effective in the HCV GT1, 4 infections.

Hepatitis C Virus Treatment: Simplifying the Simple and Optimizing the Difficult

The availability of safe, efficacious, oral direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have ushered in a new era of hepatitis C treatment with potential to eliminate hepatitis C as a public health threat. To achieve population-level effectiveness of these oral DAAs, hepatitis C treatment by a wide range of providers in different settings will be essential to increase the number of persons treated. We provide a clinical review of hepatitis C treatment with a focus on practical tools for management of hepatitis C in majority of currently infected individuals who can be easily cured and optimization of treatment for those in whom treatment may not be as simple.

Safety and tolerability of elbasvir/grazoprevir in chronic hepatitis C virus therapy: Integrated analysis from clinical trials

Direct-acting antiviral treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are generally safe; however, understanding the safety profile of each regimen is essential for their continued use. Safety data were pooled from 12 clinical trials of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) that enrolled adult participants with HCV infection. Pooled analyses are presented for participants receiving EBR/GZR for 12 weeks and those receiving EBR/GZR plus ribavirin (RBV) for 16-18 weeks. Safety data are also presented for participants with comorbidities receiving EBR/GZR for 12 weeks in individual clinical trials (chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage 4/5, inherited blood disorders [IBLD] or receiving opioid agonist therapy [OAT]). Among 1743 participants receiving EBR/GZR for 12 weeks, 1068 (61.3%) reported ≥1 adverse event (AE) and 491 had AEs (28.2%) considered drug-related. The most frequent AEs were headache (10.6%), fatigue (8.7%), nasopharyngitis (5.8%), nausea (5.1%) and diarrhoea (5.0%). Serious AEs were reported by 37 participants (2.1%), and 12 (0.7%) discontinued treatment due to an AE. In populations with CKD 4/5 or IBLD or receiving OAT, safety was similar in participants receiving EBR/GZR for 12 weeks and those receiving placebo. Some AEs occurred at higher frequencies in participants receiving RBV compared with those receiving EBR/GZR alone: fatigue (32.7% vs 8.7%); headache (21.6% vs 10.6%); and nausea (15.8% vs 5.1%). Safety was similar in participants with and those without cirrhosis. Grade 3/4 alanine aminotransferase elevations were reported in 0.7% participants. EBR/GZR is a safe treatment option for individuals with HCV genotype (GT) 1 or GT4 infections, even those with challenging comorbidities such as CKD or IBLD and those receiving OAT.

EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C: Final update of the series☆

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of chronic liver disease, with approximately 71 million chronically infected individuals worldwide. Clinical care for patients with HCV-related liver disease has advanced considerably thanks to an enhanced understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease, as well as developments in diagnostic procedures and improvements in therapy and prevention. These therapies make it possible to eliminate hepatitis C as a major public health threat, as per the World Health Organization target, although the timeline and feasibility vary from region to region. These European Association for the Study of the Liver recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C describe the optimal management of patients with recently acquired and chronic HCV infections in 2020 and onwards.

Efficacy of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir in Early Chronic G1/G4 Hepatitis C infection in HIV/HCV co-infected patients with mild fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Acute hepatitis C virus (AHC) infection is increasingly common among HIV+ men who have sex with men (MSM). Until 2017, the guidelines recommended therapy with pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin with a mild sustained virological response (SVR). This prompted many patients to reject that treatment, at that time, waiting to be treated with better and safer options with new Direct-Acting-Antivirals (DAA).

OBJECTIVES

Assess the efficacy and safety of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir to treat recent chronic hepatitis C infection, genotype 1 or 4, in HIV+ MSM patients.

METHODS

Prospective, open-labeled, two center, pilot study. SVR is analyzed for treatment with Elbasvir/Grazoprevir (8 weeks in GT1b or 12 in GT1a or GT4) in patients with a recent chronic HCV infection, defined as HCV infection lasting less than 4 years and mild liver fibrosis (liver stiffness <8kPa).

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were included (May 2017-March 2018): 2 GT1b, 24 GT1a and 22 GT4. HCV-RNA>800000UI in 63% and medium liver stiffness 4.9kPa. The SVR was 98%, one patient failed due to poor adherence. 67% of patients had adverse effects, but only 16% treatment related. The most frequent side effects were gastrointestinal (19%), related with the central nervous system (18%), respiratory (16%) and systemic symptoms (15%). During one year of follow-up post-therapy, 4 AHC and 18 patients with sexually transmitted diseases (STD) were diagnosed.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with Elbasvir/Grazoprevir in this scenario is highly effective and safe. Patients with risky sexual practices must remain linked to the medical care system to detect new STD and HCV reinfection.

Efficacy and safety of direct acting antiviral regimens for hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus co-infection: systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Various all-oral direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens are being widely used in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infected patients; however, the comparative efficacy and safety of different types and combinations of DAAs are not completely clear. There is still a lack of integration of evidence for optimized therapies for HIV/HCV co-infection.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search in several databases up to January 1, 2020. All the studies that reported the sustained virologic response (SVR) and adverse events of DAAs in HIV/HCV co-infected patients were included. The Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo method was used for the pooled estimates of network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 33 eligible articles with 7 combinations of all-oral DAAs for the analyses of efficacy and safety. Grazoprevir-elbasvir ± ribavirin (GZR/EBR ± RBV: 95.6%; 95% CrI, 91.7-98.1%), ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir ± ribavirin (3D ± RBV: 95.3%; 95% CrI, 93.4-96.9%), sofosbuvir-ledipasvir ± ribavirin (SOF/LDV ± RBV: 95.2%; 95% CrI, 93.7-96.6%), and sofosbuvir-daclatasvir ± ribavirin (SOF/DCV ± RBV: 94.8%; 95% CrI, 92.5-96.6%) were the most effective combinations for HIV/HCV co-infected patients, with SVR rates of approximately 94% and above while severe adverse events were rare. However, the SVR rates of sofosbuvir-ribavirin (SOF/RBV) and sofosbuvir-simeprevir ± ribavirin (SOF/SMV ± RBV) both failed to reach 90%, and the incidences of adverse events were higher than 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Efficacy and safety of all-oral DAAs were in prospect for HIV/HCV co-infection patients. GZR/EBR ± RBV was the optimal combination recommended for HIV/HCV co-infected patients based on the excellent treatment effects and insignificant adverse events.

Hepatitis C treatment outcome in former or current intravenous drug users coinfected with HIV, with or without directly observed therapy

BACKGROUND

Intravenous drug users (IDUs) with hepatitis C virus (HCV)/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-coinfection are recognised as a high-risk, vulnerable group.

METHODS

Between February 2015 and April 2018, a single-centre, non-interventional cohort study was conducted in an outpatient setting, to evaluate the sustained virologic response (SVR12) and assess treatment uptake models. The study included 385 former or recent IDUs divided into two groups: A-without use of opioid substitution treatment (OST) and B-patients taking opioid substitution; patients in group B received OST and self-administered therapy (B1) or OST and therapy under DOT (B2). Patients were characterised by demographic and clinical features and compared for treatment response. Correlations between SVR12 and independent variables were determined by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Patients were mostly males (88.3%) with a mean age of 46 ± 5 years and HCV genotype 1a (63.7%). Approximately 28% were treatment-experienced and 84.9% received sofosbuvir/ledipasvir. The mean CD4⁺T count was 649 cells/mm³, and most individuals were on antiretroviral therapy with undetectable viral loads (97.4%). SVR12 was achieved in 94.8%, and only eight patients relapsed. No significant differences were found in treatment effect between individuals taking opioid substitutes under different treatment models. Correlations were found between HCV viral response and both HIV suppression and albumin levels.

CONCLUSIONS

IDU with HCV/HIV coinfection, including individuals on self-administration of HCV therapy and opioid substitution treatments or in DOT programmes, are no longer considered a difficult-to-treat group, as they achieve high rates of SVR12.

Elbasvir/Grazoprevir in People With Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection and Child-Pugh Class B Cirrhosis: The C-SALT Study

Treatment options are limited for people infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) with decompensated liver disease. The C-SALT study assessed elbasvir (EBR) plus grazoprevir (GZR) in individuals with HCV genotype 1 infection and Child-Pugh class B (CP-B) cirrhosis.