Management of children with multidrug-resistant sepsis in low-income and middle-income countries

Antimicrobial stewardship in children: more shadows than lights?

Introduction: The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes in the pediatric population in improving clinical outcomes, altering prescribing behavior, controlling antimicrobial resistance and measuring the cost-effectiveness.Areas covered: Medline Ovid MEDLINE(R), Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched on 30 September 2018 combining MeSH and free terms for 'antimicrobial stewardship', 'clinical outcomes', 'antimicrobial resistance', 'cost-effectiveness' and 'prescribing behavior'. Several studies have been conducted on the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) in children, which showed a positive impact on length of hospital stay and days of therapy. Together with ASP bundles, the introduction of fast microbiology and point-of-care tests showed a positive impact in terms of rapid identification of the pathogen, time to optimal antimicrobial therapy and reduction of antibiotic use, without worsening clinical outcomes. These improvements turned out to be limited over time. Conflicting results were observed regarding the impact of ASPs on antimicrobial resistance and on cost-effectiveness and cost-benefits, due to the lack of homogeneity between studies.Expert opinion: Evidence regarding the impact of ASPs in children is limited to single center studies, with different study designs, making it impossible to draw unequivocal conclusions. High quality studies are needed. More feasable approaches should be designed both for inpatients and outpatients and for critical patients.

Risk factors of neonatal sepsis in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The incidence of neonatal sepsis in India is the highest in the world. Evidence regarding its risk factors can guide clinical practice and prevention strategies.

OBJECTIVE

To review, assess and synthesize the available literature from India on the risk factors of sepsis among neonates.

METHODOLOGY

A systematic review was conducted. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Popline, IndMed, Indian Science Abstracts and Google Scholar from inception up to March 23, 2018 to identify observational analytical studies reporting on risk factors of laboratory-confirmed neonatal sepsis in India. Two authors independently screened studies (title, abstract and full-text stages), extracted data, and assessed quality. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed as substantial heterogeneity was anticipated. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were additionally performed. Effect size in our review included odds ratio and standardized mean difference.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included from 11,009 records, of which nine were prospective in design. Birthweight and gestational age at delivery were the most frequently reported factors. On meta-analyses, it was found that male sex (OR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.68), out born neonates (OR: 5.5, 95% CI: 2.39, 12.49), need for artificial ventilation (OR: 5.61; 95% CI: 8.21, 41.18), gestational age <37 weeks (OR: 2.05; 95% CI:1.40, 2.99) and premature rupture of membranes (OR:11.14, 95% CI: 5.54, 22.38) emerged as risk factors for neonatal sepsis. Included studies scored lowest on exposure assessment and confounding adjustment, which limited comparability. Inadequacy and variation in definitions and methodology affected the quality of included studies and increased heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Male neonates, outborn admissions, need for artificial ventilation, gestational age <37 weeks and premature rupture of membranes are risk factors for sepsis among neonates in India. Robustly designed and reported research is urgently needed to confirm the role of other risk factors of neonatal sepsis in India.

Pediatric bloodstream infections in metropolitan Australia

BACKGROUND

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) cause significant morbidity and mortality of children worldwide. The aim of this study was to investigate BSI in children and determine the identity of causative organism and their susceptibility patterns in a metropolitan public hospital in Australia.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed children aged 0-16 years admitted to a public hospital from January 1, 2010 to August 31, 2014 inclusive, and whose blood cultures revealed bacteraemia. Data were collected regarding patient demographics, species of bacteria isolated, antimicrobial susceptibility of these isolates, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Out of 96 patients with BSI, 55 (57.3%) were males. The median age was 3.35 years (IQR 0.44-7.46), and there were 2 mortalities. Common sites of infection were the respiratory tract (16.6%, n = 16), bone and joints (15.6%, n = 15) and the urinary tract (11.5%, n = 11). The most frequent isolates were Staphylococcus aureus (27.0%), Escherichia coli (14.0%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (12.0%). Whilst most bacterial isolates displayed susceptibility (> 90%) to common antimicrobial agents, only 57.1% (8/14) of Escherichia coli isolates were susceptible to ampicillin and 58.3% (7/12) were susceptible to co-trimoxazole.

CONCLUSIONS

Gram-positive bacteria accounted for the majority of pediatric BSIs, of which invasive pneumococcal disease remains a noteworthy cause. The majority of isolates, except Escherichia coli, were susceptible to commonly used antimicrobials. This study confirms the knowledge of high rates of resistance of Escherichia coli to ampicillin. Therefore, empirical treatment should still include gentamicin. Monitoring of resistance patterns is warranted to ensure that antibiotic therapy remains appropriate.