Some pearl millet-based foods promote satiety or reduce glycaemic response in a crossover trial

Effects of acute consumption of a beverage based on extruded whole-grain pearl millet flour on glycemic and insulinemic control, food intake, and appetite sensation in eutrophic adults: A randomized cross-over clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

Whole-grain pearl millet is a nutritious cereal source of dietary fiber, vitamins, minerals, and bioactive compounds. It offers health benefits such as glycemic control and satiety. Extrusion cooking for diverse formulations, including beverages, can alter its chemical composition, impacting the nutritional value. This study aimed to evaluate the sensory acceptability of an extruded millet flour beverage and its acute effects on glycemic index (GI), glycemic and insulinemic response, food intake, and subjective appetite sensations in euglycemic and eutrophic adults.

METHODS

This is an acute, single-blind, randomized, controlled, cross-over clinical study comprising 14 euglycemic and eutrophic adults. Initially, beverages based on whole extruded millet flour were developed, and sensorially and chemically analyzed. Next, a clinical trial was conducted with participants undergoing four sessions and consuming one of the following options: extruded millet beverage, a maltodextrin control beverage, or a glucose solution administered in two separate sessions. Blood glucose, insulin, and appetite responses were assessed over a 2-h period, in addition to determining the GI of the beverages and analyzing food intake in the 24 h following each session.

RESULTS

The extruded millet flour strawberry-flavored beverage had the best sensory acceptance and was classified as having as high GI. Consumption of the extruded millet beverage showed similar glycemic and insulinemic responses, as well as appetite control and food intake of the subjects, when compared with consumption of the maltodextrin control beverage.

CONCLUSIONS

Intake of the extruded millet beverage maintained glycemic and insulinemic responses, appetite control, and food intake in euglycemic and eutrophic subjects.

Designing healthier and more sustainable ultraprocessed foods

The food industry has been extremely successful in creating a broad range of delicious, affordable, convenient, and safe food and beverage products. However, many of these products are considered to be ultraprocessed foods (UPFs) that contain ingredients and are processed in a manner that may cause adverse health effects. This review article introduces the concept of UPFs and briefly discusses food products that fall into this category, including beverages, baked goods, snacks, confectionary, prepared meals, dressings, sauces, spreads, and processed meat and meat analogs. It then discusses correlations between consumption levels of UPFs and diet-related chronic diseases, such as obesity and diabetes. The different reasons for the proposed ability of UPFs to increase the risk of these chronic diseases are then critically assessed, including displacement of whole foods, high energy densities, missing phytochemicals, contamination with packaging chemicals, hyperpalatability, harmful additives, rapid ingestion and digestion, and toxic reaction products. Then, potential strategies to overcome the current problems with UPFs are presented, including reducing energy density, balancing nutritional profile, fortification, increasing satiety response, modulating mastication and digestion, reengineering food structure, and precision processing. The central argument is that it may be possible to reformulate and reengineer many UPFs to improve their healthiness and sustainability, although this still needs to be proved using rigorous scientific studies.

Finger millet-based muffin decreases insulin response in individuals with prediabetes in a randomised controlled trial

Millet is a grain high in polyphenols and antioxidants, which are bioactive compounds known to influence blood glucose response. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of finger millet muffin and wheat muffin on glycaemic response (GR), insulin response (IR), gastric emptying (GE) and satiety in healthy individuals and people with prediabetes. In a single-blind randomised controlled crossover trial at Oxford Brookes Centre for Nutrition and Health, fifteen healthy individuals and fourteen individuals with prediabetes were recruited between May and December 2017. The participants' GR (3 h), IR (3 h), GE (4 h) and satiety (4 h) were measured before and after the consumption of muffins. A mixed method ANOVA was used to compare GE and the incremental AUC (iAUC) for GR and IR between the participant groups and muffins. There was a significant interaction between participants and muffins on IR iAUC at 180 min (P = 0·042). A significant effect of muffins was found on the GR peak (P = 0·013). The millet muffin decreased the GR peak and IR iAUC compared with the wheat muffin in participants with prediabetes. A significant interaction between participants and muffins for GE ascension time Tasc (P = 0·017) was observed, with no effect of muffins on satiety AUC in the participant groups. This study suggested that polyphenol and fibre-rich finger millet may have the potential to influence the management of prediabetes.

Matched whole grain wheat and refined wheat milled products do not differ in glycemic response or gastric emptying in a randomized, crossover trial

BACKGROUND

Epidemiologic and some clinical studies support the view that whole grain foods have lower glycemic response than refined grain foods. However, from the perspective of food material properties, it is not clear why whole grain cereals containing mostly insoluble and nonviscous dietary fibers (e.g., wheat) would reduce postprandial glycemia.

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that glycemic response for whole grain wheat milled products would not differ from that of refined wheat when potentially confounding variables (wheat source, food form, particle size, viscosity) were matched. Our objective was to study the effect of whole grain wheat compared with refined wheat milled products on postprandial glycemia, gastric emptying, and subjective appetite.

METHODS

Using a randomized crossover design, healthy participants (n = 16) consumed 6 different medium-viscosity porridges made from whole grain wheat or refined wheat milled products, all from the same grain source and mill: whole wheat flour, refined wheat flour, cracked wheat, semolina, reconstituted wheat flour with fine bran, and reconstituted wheat flour with coarse bran. Postprandial glycemia, gastric emptying, and appetitive response were measured using continuous glucose monitors, the 13C-octanoic acid (8:0) breath test, and visual analog scale (VAS) ratings. Bayes factors were implemented to draw inferences about null effects.

RESULTS

Little-to-no differences were observed in glycemic responses, with lower incremental AUC between 0 and 120 min glycemic responses only for semolina [mean difference (MD): -966 mg min/dL; 95% CI: -1775, -156 mg min/dL; P = 0.02) and cracked wheat (MD: -721 mg min/dL; 95% CI: -1426, -16 mg min/dL; P = 0.04) than for whole wheat flour porridge. Bayes factors suggested weak to strong evidence for a null effect (i.e., no effect of treatment type) in glycemic response, gastric emptying, and VAS ratings.

CONCLUSIONS

Although whole grain wheat foods provide other health benefits, they did not in their natural composition confer lower postprandial glycemia or gastric emptying than their refined wheat counterparts.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03467659.

Activation of gastrointestinal ileal brake response with dietary slowly digestible carbohydrates, with no observed effect on subjective appetite, in an acute randomized, double-blind, crossover trial

PURPOSE

To test the hypothesis that oral ingestion of slowly digestible carbohydrates (SDCs) that reach the ileum triggers the ileal brake as indicated by delayed gastric emptying, reduced glycemic response, and decreased subjective appetite.

METHODS

The study was a five-arm, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial with a 1-week washout period between treatments (n = 20; 9 females, 11 males). Five treatments consisted of three SDC ingredients [raw corn starch, isomaltooligosaccharide (IMO), sucromalt], and an IMO/sucromalt combination, shown in vitro to have slow and extended digestion profiles, and a rapidly digestible carbohydrate control (maltodextrin). Carbohydrates (26 g) were incorporated into yogurt [300 g total; carbohydrate (~ 77 g), fat (~ 0.2 g), and protein (~ 9 g)] with closely matched energy content (346 kcal) and viscosity (~ 30,000 cP). Outcomes were measured in a 4 h postprandial period.

RESULTS

Mean gastric half-emptying times were moderately though significantly increased for the raw corn starch and IMO treatments (P < 0.05), but they could be sub-divided into larger effect responder (n = 11) and non-responder groups (n = 9). Longer time for glycemic response to return to baseline was associated with increased gastric half-emptying time in an exploratory subset of data removing gastric half-emptying times > 3.5 h (P = 0.02). No significant differences in appetite ratings were observed.

CONCLUSION

SDCs caused slower gastric emptying rate through activation of the ileal brake, as closely matched semi-solid yogurts were used and only rate of carbohydrate digestion differed. Extending glycemic response through consumption of SDCs was associated with triggering the ileal brake.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03630445, August 2018, retrospectively registered.