Indications and management of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Cardiac implantable electronic devices in pediatric and congenital populations

Pediatric patients and children and adults with congenital heart disease often will require implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) for management of a variety of cardiac rhythm pathologies. The safe and effective use of CIEDs in these patients requires an awareness of important differences between this special population and the adult populations for whom these devices were primarily developed and in whom they have been most thoroughly studied. These include issues of body size and growth, anticipated lifespan, anatomical issues related to implantation and the epidemiology of underlying rhythm issues. In this paper, we discuss these issues in the context of the current state of the art in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients with respect to implant and lead extraction strategies, physiological cardiac pacing and resynchronization, ICD indications and use of transvenous and subcutaneous devices, and the use of implantable monitoring devices.

Arrhythmias and Sudden Death: What is New in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy?

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a complex genetic disorder that has garnered significant attention because of its diverse manifestations, including arrhythmias and heightened risk of sudden cardiac death. Advances in precision diagnostics, such as genetic testing and cardiac imaging with late gadolinium enhancement, have refined HCM diagnosis, enabling targeted therapeutic and risk stratification approaches. AF, prevalent in HCM, exacerbates symptoms and stroke risk, while ventricular arrhythmias pose a direct threat to survival. Catheter ablation offers symptom relief in AF patients with HCM, yet recurrence remains high because of unique myocardial changes, highlighting the need for refined patient selection and long-term monitoring. The risk of sudden cardiac death in HCM, particularly in younger individuals, underscores the importance of precise risk stratification tools such as the European Society of Cardiology HCM Risk-SCD model. The expanding role of ICDs and emerging pharmacological agents, including myosin inhibitors, marks a shift toward more individualised management of HCM. This review integrates recent developments in arrhythmia management, targeted therapies and risk assessment, offering a comprehensive perspective on HCM tailored to improve clinical outcomes through a precision-medicine lens.

Prognostic role of novel variables in sudden cardiac death risk associated to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

INTRODUCTION

Models for estimating the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in pediatric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) used in our setting do not consider some parameters of routine clinical practice. The objective was to identify non-classical risk factors and evaluate their prognostic value.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective observational study, including patients with isolated HCM 0-18 years old, evaluating clinical, genetic, and imaging variables. The risk of SCD or major arrhythmic cardiac events (MACEs) was estimated according to the three most widely used European models (HCM Risk-SCD, European Society of Cardiology [ESC] algorithm, and HCM Risk-Kids), analyzing their predictive capacity by adding genotyping and advanced cardiac imaging parameters.

RESULTS

The sample included 77 patients followed up for 5.25 years. Ten (13%) experienced a MACE. We found that MACE was significantly associated with myocardial deformation and positive genotype status, and associated, although not significantly, to late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in cardiac MRI (P = .062). Events were more frequent (hazard ratio = 18.5; P = .006) and occurred earlier (P = .022) in association with variants in genes other than MYBPC3. The inclusion of "genotype other than MYBPC3" and "presence of LGE" improved the predictive capacity of the models for the high-risk (C-statistic 0.94 vs 0.84 with HCM Risk-SCD; 0.88 vs 0.74 with ESC algorithm; 0.90 vs 0.80 with HCM Risk-Kids) and intermediate-risk categories (C-statistic 0.88 vs 0.51 with HCM Risk-SCD; 0.85 vs 0.64 with ESC algorithm; 0.84 vs 0.51 with HCM Risk-Kids).

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive capacity of European risk models improves by incorporating the variables "genotype other than MYBPC3" and "presence of LGE", although larger studies are required to validate their prognostic value.

Evaluation of new predictive scores for sudden cardiac death in childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a French cohort

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is rare in children, and sudden cardiac death (SCD) is difficult to predict. Two prognostic scores - HCM Risk-Kids and Precision Medicine for Cardiomyopathy (PRIMaCY) - were developed to assess the risk of SCD in the next 5 years in children with HCM.

AIMS

To test the ability of these scores to predict SCD in children with HCM. Also, to identify factors associated with a severe cardiac rhythmic event (SCRE) (ventricular fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia, heart transplant for rhythmic reasons or SCD).

METHODS

Retrospective, multicentre, observational study at 10 medical centres in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais region, France.

RESULTS

This study included 72 paediatric patients with HCM during 2009-2019 who were followed for a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 8.5 (5.0-16.2) years. Eleven patients (15.3%) presented with SCRE. HCM Risk-Kids was high, with a median (IQR) score of 6.2% (2.1-12.8%; significant threshold≥6.0%) and the PRIMaCY median (IQR) score was 7.1% (2.6-15.0%; significant threshold≥8.3%). The positive predictive value was only 27.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.5-32.5%) for HCM Risk-Kids (with a threshold of≥6.0%) and 33.2% (95% CI 27.1-38.9%) for the PRIMaCY score (with a threshold of≥8.3%). The negative predictive values were 95.4% (95% CI 92.3-97.7%) and 93.0% (95% CI 89.8-96.2%), respectively. Three of 28 patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) experienced complications (including inappropriate shocks).

CONCLUSION

HCM Risk-Kids and the PRIMaCY score have low positive predictive values to predict SCD in paediatric patients. If used alone, they could increase the rate of ICD implantation and thus ICD complications. Therefore, the scores should be used in combination with other data (genetic and magnetic resonance imaging results).

Inherited Arrhythmias in the Pediatric Population: An Updated Overview

Pediatric cardiomyopathies (CMs) and electrical diseases constitute a heterogeneous spectrum of disorders distinguished by structural and electrical abnormalities in the heart muscle, attributed to a genetic variant. They rank among the main causes of morbidity and mortality in the pediatric population, with an annual incidence of 1.1-1.5 per 100,000 in children under the age of 18. The most common conditions are dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Despite great enthusiasm for research in this field, studies in this population are still limited, and the management and treatment often follow adult recommendations, which have significantly more data on treatment benefits. Although adult and pediatric cardiac diseases share similar morphological and clinical manifestations, their outcomes significantly differ. This review summarizes the latest evidence on genetics, clinical characteristics, management, and updated outcomes of primary pediatric CMs and electrical diseases, including DCM, HCM, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), Brugada syndrome (BrS), catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), long QT syndrome (LQTS), and short QT syndrome (SQTS).

Analysis of risk stratification and prevention of sudden death in pediatric patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Dilemmas and clarity

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has been considered the most common cause of sudden death (SD) in the young. However, introduction of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in HCM has proved highly effective and the mainstay of preventing SD in children, adolescents, and adults by terminating malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Nevertheless, ICD decision making is generally regarded as more difficult in pediatrics, and the strategy for selecting ICD patients from this population remains without consensus. Prospective studies in HCM children and adolescents have shown the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology traditional major risk marker strategy to be reliable with >90% sensitivity in selecting patients for SD prevention. International data in >2000 young HCM patients assembled over 20 years who were stratified by major risk markers showed ICDs effectively prevented SD in 20%. Alternatively, novel quantitative risk scoring initiatives provide 5-year risk estimates that are potentially useful as adjunctive tools to facilitate discussion of prophylactic ICD risks vs benefit but are as yet unsupported by prospective outcome studies. Risk scoring strategies are characterized by reasonable discriminatory statistical power (C-statistic 0.69-0.76) for identifying patients with SD events but with relatively low sensitivity, albeit with specificity comparable with the risk marker strategy. While some reticence for obligating healthy-appearing young patients to lifelong device implants is understandable, underutilization of the ICD in high-risk children and adolescents can represent a lost opportunity for fulfilling the long-standing aspiration of SD prevention. This review provides a critical assessment of the current strengths and weaknesses of SD risk stratification strategies in young HCM patients in an effort to clarify clinical decision making in this challenging subpopulation.