Implicit Solvents for the Polarizable Atomic Multipole AMOEBA Force Field

Development of a QM/MM(ABEEM) method for the deprotonation of neutral and cation radicals in the G-tetrad and GGX(8-oxo-G) tetrad

The rapid deprotonation of G˙+ in the DNA strand impedes positive charge (hole) transfer, whereas the slow deprotonation rate of G˙+ in the G-tetrad makes it a more suitable carrier for hole conduction. The QM/MM(ABEEM) combined method, which involves the integration of QM and the ABEEM polarizable force field (ABEEM PFF), was developed to investigate the deprotonation of neutral and cation free radicals in the G-tetrad and GGX(8-oxo-G) tetrad (xanthine and 8-oxoguanine dual substituted G-tetrad). By incorporating valence-state electronegativity piecewise functions χ*(r) and implementing charge local conservation conditions, QM/MM(ABEEM) possesses the advantage of accurately simulating charge transfer and polarization effect during deprotonation. The activation energy calculated by the QM method of X˙ is the lowest among other bases in the GGX(8-oxo-G) tetrad, which is supported by the computation of the average electronegativity calculated by ABEEM PFF. By utilizing QM/MM(ABEEM) with a two-way free energy perturbation method, the deprotonation activation energy of X˙ in the GGX(8-oxo-G) tetrad is determined to be 33.0 ± 2.1 kJ mol-1, while that of G˙+ in the G-tetrad is 20.7 ± 0.6 kJ mol-1, consistent with the experimental measurement of 20 ± 1.0 kJ mol-1. These results manifest that X˙ in the GGX(8-oxo-G) tetrad exhibits a slower deprotonation rate than G˙+ in the G-tetrad, suggesting that the GGX(8-oxo-G) tetrad may serve as a more favorable hole transport carrier. Furthermore, the unequal average electronegativities of bases in the GGX(8-oxo-G) tetrad impede the deprotonation rate. This study provides a potential foundation for investigating the microscopic mechanism of DNA electronic devices.

The Importance of Charge Transfer and Solvent Screening in the Interactions of Backbones and Functional Groups in Amino Acid Residues and Nucleotides

Quantum mechanical (QM) calculations at the level of density-functional tight-binding are applied to a protein–DNA complex (PDB: 2o8b) consisting of 3763 atoms, averaging 100 snapshots from molecular dynamics simulations. A detailed comparison of QM and force field (Amber) results is presented. It is shown that, when solvent screening is taken into account, the contributions of the backbones are small, and the binding of nucleotides in the double helix is governed by the base–base interactions. On the other hand, the backbones can make a substantial contribution to the binding of amino acid residues to nucleotides and other residues. The effect of charge transfer on the interactions is also analyzed, revealing that the actual charge of nucleotides and amino acid residues can differ by as much as 6 and 8% from the formal integer charge, respectively. The effect of interactions on topological models (protein -residue networks) is elucidated.

CHARMM-GUI Implicit Solvent Modeler for Various Generalized Born Models in Different Simulation Programs

Implicit solvent models are widely used because they are advantageous to speed up simulations by drastically decreasing the number of solvent degrees of freedom, which allows one to achieve long simulation time scales for large system sizes. CHARMM-GUI, a web-based platform, has been developed to support the setup of complex multicomponent molecular systems and prepare input files. This study describes an Implicit Solvent Modeler (ISM) in CHARMM-GUI for various generalized Born (GB) implicit solvent simulations in different molecular dynamics programs such as AMBER, CHARMM, GENESIS, NAMD, OpenMM, and Tinker. The GB models available in ISM include GB-HCT, GB-OBC, GB-neck, GBMV, and GBSW with the CHARMM and Amber force fields for protein, DNA, RNA, glycan, and ligand systems. Using the system and input files generated by ISM, implicit solvent simulations of protein, DNA, and RNA systems produce similar results for different simulation packages with the same input information. Protein-ligand systems are also considered to further validate the systems and input files generated by ISM. Simple ligand root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) and molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (MM/GBSA) calculations show that the performance of implicit simulations is better than docking and can be used for early stage ligand screening. These reasonable results indicate that ISM is a useful and reliable tool to provide various implicit solvent simulation applications.

Automation of AMOEBA polarizable force field for small molecules: Poltype 2

A next-generation protocol (Poltype 2) has been developed which automatically generates AMOEBA polarizable force field parameters for small molecules. Both features and computational efficiency have been drastically improved. Notable advances include improved database transferability using SMILES, robust torsion fitting, non-aromatic ring torsion parameterization, coupled torsion-torsion parameterization, Van der Waals parameter refinement using ab initio dimer data and an intelligent fragmentation scheme that produces parameters with dramatically reduced ab initio computational cost. Additional improvements include better local frame assignment for atomic multipoles, automated formal charge assignment, Zwitterion detection, smart memory resource defaults, parallelized fragment job submission, incorporation of Psi4 quantum package, ab initio error handling, ionization state enumeration, hydration free energy prediction and binding free energy prediction. For validation, we have applied Poltype 2 to ~1000 FDA approved drug molecules from DrugBank. The ab initio molecular dipole moments and electrostatic potential values were compared with Poltype 2 derived AMOEBA counterparts. Parameters were further substantiated by calculating hydration free energy (HFE) on 40 small organic molecules and were compared with experimental data, resulting in an RMSE error of 0.59 kcal/mol. The torsion database has expanded to include 3543 fragments derived from FDA approved drugs. Poltype 2 provides a convenient utility for applications including binding free energy prediction for computational drug discovery. Further improvement will focus on automated parameter refinement by experimental liquid properties, expansion of the Van der Waals parameter database and automated parametrization of modified bio-fragments such as amino and nucleic acids.

Recent progress in general force fields of small molecules

Recent advances in computational hardware and free energy algorithms enable a broader application of molecular simulation of binding interactions between receptors and small-molecule ligands. The underlying molecular mechanics force fields (FFs) for small molecules have also achieved advancements in accuracy, user-friendliness, and speed during the past several years (2018-2020). Besides the expansion of chemical space coverage of ligand-like molecules among major popular classical additive FFs and polarizable FFs, new charge models have been proposed for better accuracy and transferability, new chemical perception of avoiding predefined atom types have been applied, and new automated parameterization toolkits, including machine learning approaches, have been developed for users' convenience.

Operando Characterization of Organic Mixed Ionic/Electronic Conducting Materials

Operando characterization plays an important role in revealing the structure-property relationships of organic mixed ionic/electronic conductors (OMIECs), enabling the direct observation of dynamic changes during device operation and thus guiding the development of new materials. This review focuses on the application of different operando characterization techniques in the study of OMIECs, highlighting the time-dependent and bias-dependent structure, composition, and morphology information extracted from these techniques. We first illustrate the needs, requirements, and challenges of operando characterization then provide an overview of relevant experimental techniques, including spectroscopy, scattering, microbalance, microprobe, and electron microscopy. We also compare different in silico methods and discuss the interplay of these computational methods with experimental techniques. Finally, we provide an outlook on the future development of operando for OMIEC-based devices and look toward multimodal operando techniques for more comprehensive and accurate description of OMIECs.

How much can physics do for protein design?

Physics and physical chemistry are an important thread in computational protein design, complementary to knowledge-based tools. They provide molecular mechanics scoring functions that need little or no ad hoc parameter readjustment, methods to thoroughly sample equilibrium ensembles, and different levels of approximation for conformational flexibility. They led recently to the successful redesign of a small protein using a physics-based folded state energy. Adaptive Monte Carlo or molecular dynamics schemes were discovered where protein variants are populated as per their ligand-binding free energy or catalytic efficiency. Molecular dynamics have been used for backbone flexibility. Implicit solvent models have been refined, polarizable force fields applied, and many physical insights obtained.