Investigation of Self-Emulsifying Drug-Delivery System Interaction with a Biomimetic Membrane under Conditions Relevant to the Small Intestine

Estimation of the concentration boundary layer adjacent to a flat surface using computational fluid dynamics

Dissolution-permeation (D/P) experiments are widely used during preclinical development due to producing results with better predictability than traditional monophasic experiments. However, it is difficult to compare absorption across in vitro setups given the propensity to only report apparent permeability. We therefore developed an approach to predict the concentration boundary layer for any D/P device by using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The Navier-Stokes and continuity equation in 2D were solved numerically in MATLAB and by finite element methods in COMSOL v6.1 to predict the momentum [Formula: see text] and concentration ηg boundary layer for a flow over a flat plate, i.e. the classical Blasius boundary layer flow. A MATLAB algorithm was developed to calculate the edge of either boundary layer. The methodology to determine the concentration boundary layer based on Blasius's analysis provided an accurate estimate for both [Formula: see text] and ηg, resulting in, [Formula: see text] , at high Schmidt numbers (Sc ∼ 1000) within 14 % of the Blasius solution and 6.6 % of the accepted Schmidt number correlation ( [Formula: see text] ). The methodology based on the Blasius analysis of the concentration boundary layer using velocity and concentration profiles computed using CFD presented herein will enable characterization/analysis of complex D/P apparatuses used in preclinical development, where an analytical solution may not be available.

Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) disrupt the gut microbiota and trigger an intestinal inflammatory response in rats

Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (i.e. SEDDS, SMEDDS and SNEDDS) are widely employed as solubility and bioavailability enhancing formulation strategies for poorly water-soluble drugs. Despite the capacity for SEDDS to effectively facilitate oral drug absorption, tolerability concerns exist due to the capacity for high concentrations of surfactants (typically present within SEDDS) to induce gastrointestinal toxicity and mucosal irritation. With new knowledge surrounding the role of the gut microbiota in modulating intestinal inflammation and mucosal injury, there is a clear need to determine the impact of SEDDS on the gut microbiota. The current study is the first of its kind to demonstrate the detrimental impact of SEDDS on the gut microbiota of Sprague-Dawley rats, following daily oral administration (100 mg/kg) for 21 days. SEDDS comprising a lipid phase (i.e. Type I, II and III formulations according to the Lipid Formulation Classification Scheme) induced significant changes to the composition and diversity of the gut microbiota, evidenced through a reduction in operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and alpha diversity (Shannon's index), along with statistically significant shifts in beta diversity (according to PERMANOVA of multi-dimensional Bray-Curtis plots). Key signatures of gut microbiota dysbiosis correlated with the increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines within the jejunum, while mucosal injury was characterised by significant reductions in plasma citrulline levels, a validated biomarker of enterocyte mass and mucosal barrier integrity. These findings have potential clinical ramifications for chronically administered drugs that are formulated with SEDDS and stresses the need for further studies that investigate dose-dependent effects of SEDDS on the gastrointestinal microenvironment in a clinical setting.

Critical aspects involved in lipid dispersion and digestion: Emphasis on in vitro models and factors influencing lipolysis of oral lipid based formulations

Understanding the mechanisms underlying the dispersion and digestion process is vital in the development of oral lipid-based formulations (LBFs). In vitro lipolysis models mimic the digestion process in the stomach and intestine to explore the fundamental mechanism of supersaturation, solubilization, and precipitation of drugs within the LBFs. The lipid digestion is controlled by the in vitro experimental conditions, and constitution of the lipid formulations. Hence, there is a continuous upgradation in the digestion models to best extrapolate the in vivo conditions. This review covers the recent developments in digestion models with media compositions and lipid formulation components. Key findings from recent studies that thoroughly examined the relation between the digestion, solubilization, and permeation of oral LBFs in the presence of bile-lipid aggregates are presented. These developments are foremost to build the in vitro-in vivo correlation of the drugs for regulatory considerations.

Oral delivery of calcitonin-ion pairs: In vivo proof of concept for a highly lipophilic counterion

Hydrophobic ion pairing and subsequent incorporation into self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) is a promising strategy to orally deliver hydrophilic macromolecular drugs. Within this study, hydrophobic ion pairs (HIP) between salmon calcitonin (sCT) and highly lipophilic sulfosuccinate counterions were formed and compared to frequently applied commercially available counterions. Bis(isotridecyl) sulfosuccinate resulted in HIPs of the highest lipophilicity and in significantly higher solubility in lipophilic co-solvents. Thus, bis(isotridecyl) sulfosuccinate allowed efficient solubilization of sCT in a SEDDS preconcentrate based on a lipophilic co-solvent and an indigestible lipid, but omitting hydrophilic co-solvents. In addition to the increased solubility in the lipidic matrix, markedly reduced dissociation in biorelevant media resulted in high distribution coefficients between oil droplet and FaSSGF or FaSSIF (logD) of 2.98 ± 0.12 or 2.77 ± 0.14, respectively. The composition of the lipidic matrix preserved integrity of the oil droplets after emulsification and subsequent lipolysis, allowing to fully exploit the potential of the HIP attributed to the high logD. Oral administration of the HIP-loaded SEDDS resulted in an excellent relative pharmacological activity of 13.8 ± 5.6 % measured as hypocalcaemic effect in rats.

Developing a Selective Zirconium Phosphate Cation Exchanger to Adsorb Ammonium: Effect of a Gas-Permeable and Hydrophobic Coating

A sorbent with a high enough capacity for NH₄⁺ could serve as an oral binder to lower urea levels in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients. A hydrogen-loaded cation exchanger such as zirconium phosphate Zr(HPO₄)₂·H₂O (ZrP) is a promising candidate for this application. However, the NH₄⁺ binding selectivity versus other ions must be improved. Here, we have developed a gas-permeable and hydrophobic surface coating on an amorphous form of ZrP using tetraethyl orthosilicate and methoxy-terminated polydimethylsiloxane. The hydrophobic coating serves as a barrier to ions in water solution from reaching the ion-exchanger's surface. Meanwhile, its gas-permeable nature allows for gaseous ammonia transfer to the cation exchanger. In vitro studies were designed to replicate the small intestine's expected ion concentrations and exposure time to the sorbent. The effectiveness of the coating was measured with NH₄⁺ and Ca²⁺ solutions and uncoated ZrP as the negative control. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy measurements show that the coating successfully modifies the surface of the cation exchanger─ZrP. Water contact angle studies indicate that coated ZrP is hydrophobic with an angle of (149.8 ± 2.5°). Simulated small intestine solution studies show that the coated ZrP will bind 94% (±11%) more NH₄⁺ than uncoated ZrP in the presence of Ca²⁺. Meanwhile, Ca²⁺ binding decreases by 64% (±6%). The nearly fourfold increase in NH₄⁺ selectivity can be attributed to the gas-permeable and hydrophobic coating applied on the ZrP surface. This work suggests a novel pathway to develop a selective cation exchanger for treating ESKD patients.

Digestion of lipid excipients and lipid-based nanocarriers by pancreatic lipase and pancreatin

The digestion behaviour of lipid-based nanocarriers (LNC) has a great impact on their oral drug delivery properties. In this study, various excipients including surfactants, glycerides and waxes, as well as various drug-delivery systems, namely self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS), solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) were examined via the pH-stat lipolysis model. Lipolysis experiments with lipase and pancreatin revealed the highest release of fatty acids for medium chain glycerides, followed by long chain glycerides and surfactants. Waxes appeared to be poor substrates with a maximum digestion of up to 10% within 60 min. Within the group of surfactants, the enzymatic cleavage decreased in the following order: glycerol monostearate > polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monostearate > PEG-35 castor oil > sorbitan monostearate. After digestion experiments of the excipients, SEDDS, SLN and NLC with sizes between 30 and 300 nm were prepared. The size of almost all formulations was increasing during lipolysis and levelled off after approximately 15 min except for the SLN and NLC consisting of cetyl palmitate. SEDDS exceeded 6000 nm after some minutes and were almost completely hydrolysed by pancreatin. No significant difference was observed between comparable SLN and NLC but surfactant choice and selection of the lipid component had an impact on digestion. SLN and NLC with cetyl palmitate were only digested by 5% whereas particles with glyceryl distearate were decomposed by 40-80% within 60 min. Additionally, the digestion of the same SLN or NLC, only differing in the surfactant, was higher for SLN/NLC containing polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monostearate than PEG-35 castor oil. This observation might be explained by the higher PEG content of PEG-35 castor oil causing a more pronounced steric hindrance for the access of lipase. Generally, digestion experiments performed with pancreatin resulted in a higher digestion compared to lipase. According to these results, the digestion behaviour of LNC depends on both, the type of nanocarrier and on the excipients used for them.