Challenges and Opportunities in the Global Regulation of Crop Protection Products

Regulatory framework for the assessment of the impacts of plant protection products on biodiversity: review of strengths and limits

The placing of plant protection products (PPPs) on the market in the European Union is governed by numerous regulations. These regulations are among the most stringent in the world, however they have been the subject of criticisms especially because of the decline in biodiversity. The objectives of this work were to review (1) the functioning and actors involved in the PPP framework processes, (2) the construction of the environmental risk assessment focused on biodiversity, and (3) the suggested ways to respond to the identified limits. Both literature from social sciences and ecotoxicology were examined. Despite the protective nature of the European regulation on PPPs, the very imperfect consideration of biodiversity in the evaluation process was underlined. The main limits are the multiplicity of applicable rules, the routinization of the evaluation procedures, the lack of consideration of social data, and the lack of independence of the evaluation. Strengths of the regulation are the decision to integrate a systemic approach in the evaluation of PPPs, the development of modeling tools, and the phytopharmacovigilance systems. The avenues for improvement concern the realism of the risk assessment (species used, cocktail effects…), a greater transparency and independence in the conduct of evaluations, and the opening of the evaluation and decision-making processes to actors such as beekeepers or NGOs. Truly interdisciplinary reflections crossing the functioning of the living world, its alteration by PPPs, and how these elements question the users of PPPs would allow to specify social actions, public policies, and their regulation to better protect biodiversity.

Efficient palladium-catalyzed electrocarboxylation enables late-stage carbon isotope labelling

Carbon isotope labelling of bioactive molecules is essential for accessing the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of new drug entities. Aryl carboxylic acids represent an important class of structural motifs ubiquitous in pharmaceutically active molecules and are ideal targets for the installation of a radioactive tag employing isotopically labelled CO2. However, direct isotope incorporation via the reported catalytic reductive carboxylation (CRC) of aryl electrophiles relies on excess CO2, which is incompatible with carbon-14 isotope incorporation. Furthermore, the application of some CRC reactions for late-stage carboxylation is limited because of the low tolerance of molecular complexity by the catalysts. Herein, we report the development of a practical and affordable Pd-catalysed electrocarboxylation setup. This approach enables the use of near-stoichiometric 14CO2 generated from the primary carbon-14 source Ba14CO3, facilitating late-stage and single-step carbon-14 labelling of pharmaceuticals and representative precursors. The proposed isotope-labelling protocol holds significant promise for immediate impact on drug development programmes.

A Study in Scaffold Hopping: Discovery and Optimization of Thiazolopyridines as Potent Herbicides That Inhibit Acyl-ACP Thioesterase

In the search for new chemical entities that can control resistant weeds by addressing novel modes of action (MoAs), we were interested in further exploring a compound class that contained a 1,8-naphthyridine core. By leveraging scaffold hopping methodologies, we were able to discover the new thiazolopyridine compound class that act as potent herbicidal molecules. Further biochemical investigations allowed us to identify that the thiazolopyridines inhibit acyl-acyl carrier protein (ACP) thioesterase (FAT), with this being further confirmed via an X-ray cocrystal structure. Greenhouse trials revealed that the thiazolopyridines display excellent control of grass weed species in pre-emergence application coupled with dose response windows that enable partial selectivity in certain crops.

Are Basic Substances a Key to Sustainable Pest and Disease Management in Agriculture? An Open Field Perspective

Pathogens and pests constantly challenge food security and safety worldwide. The use of plant protection products to manage them raises concerns related to human health, the environment, and economic costs. Basic substances are active, non-toxic compounds that are not predominantly used as plant protection products but hold potential in crop protection. Basic substances' attention is rising due to their safety and cost-effectiveness. However, data on their protection levels in crop protection strategies are lacking. In this review, we critically analyzed the literature concerning the field application of known and potential basic substances for managing diseases and pests, investigating their efficacy and potential integration into plant protection programs. Case studies related to grapevine, potato, and fruit protection from pre- and post-harvest diseases and pests were considered. In specific cases, basic substances and chitosan in particular, could complement or even substitute plant protection products, either chemicals or biologicals, but their efficacy varied greatly according to various factors, including the origin of the substance, the crop, the pathogen or pest, and the timing and method of application. Therefore, a careful evaluation of the field application is needed to promote the successful use of basic substances in sustainable pest management strategies in specific contexts.

Transforming the evaluation of agrochemicals

The present agrochemical safety evaluation paradigm is long-standing and anchored in well-established testing and evaluation procedures. However, it does not meet the present-day challenges of rapidly growing populations, food insecurity, and pressures from climate change. To transform the current framework and apply modern evaluation strategies that better support sustainable agriculture, the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) assembled a technical committee to reframe the safety evaluation of crop-protection products. The committee is composed of international experts from regulatory agencies, academia, industry and nongovernmental organizations. Their mission is to establish a framework that supports the development of fit-for-purpose agrochemical safety evaluation that is applicable to changing global, as well as local needs and regulatory decisions, and incorporates relevant evolving science. This will be accomplished through the integration of state-of-the-art scientific methods, technologies and data sources, to inform safety and risk decisions, and adapt them to evolving local and global needs. The project team will use a systems-thinking approach to develop the tools that will implement a problem formulation and exposure driven approach to create sustainable, safe and effective crop protection products, and reduce, replace and refine animal studies with fit-for-purpose assays. A new approach necessarily will integrate the most modern tools and latest advances in chemical testing methods to guarantee the robust human and environmental safety and risk assessment of agrochemicals. This article summarizes the challenges associated with the modernization of agrochemical safety evaluation, proposes a potential roadmap, and seeks input and engagement from the broader community to advance this effort. © 2022 Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Late-Stage Carbon-14 Labeling and Isotope Exchange: Emerging Opportunities and Future Challenges

Carbon-14 (¹⁴C) is a gold standard technology routinely utilized in pharmaceutical and agrochemical industries for tracking synthetic organic molecules and providing their metabolic and safety profiles. While the state of the art has been dominated for decades by traditional multistep synthetic approaches, the recent emergence of late-stage carbon isotope labeling has provided new avenues to rapidly access carbon-14-labeled biologically relevant compounds. In particular, the development of carbon isotope exchange has represented a fundamental paradigm change, opening the way to unexplored synthetic transformations. In this Perspective, we discuss the recent developments in the field with a critical assessment of the literature. We subsequently discuss research directions and future challenges within this rapidly evolving field.

Grandmother's pesticide exposure revealed bi-generational effects in Daphnia magna

Man-made chemicals are a significant contributor to the ongoing deterioration of numerous ecosystems. Currently, risk assessment of these chemicals is based on observations in a single generation of animals, despite potential adverse intergenerational effects. Here, we investigate the effect of the fungicide prochloraz across three generations of Daphnia magna. We studied both the effects of continuous exposure over all generations and the effects of first-generation (F0) exposure on two subsequent generations. Effects at different levels of biological organization from genome-wide gene expression, whole organism metabolite levels, CYP enzyme activity and key phenotypic effects, such as reproduction, were monitored. Acclimation to prochloraz was found after continuous exposure. Following F0-exposure, embryonically exposed F1-offspring showed no significant effects. However, in the potentially germline exposed F2 animals, several parameters differed significantly from controls. A direct association between these F2 effects and the toxic mode of action of prochloraz was found, showing that chemicals can be harmful not only to the directly exposed generation, but also to prenatally exposed generations and in that way effects may even appear to skip a generation. This implies that current risk assessment practices are neglecting an important aspect of toxicity, such as delayed effects across generations due to a time gap between chemical exposure and emergence of effects.

Synthesis and biological evaluation of stilbene-based peptoid mimics against the phytopathogenic bacterium Xanthomonas citri pv. citri

BACKGROUND

The emergence of drug-resistant phytopathogenic bacteria and the need for new types of biological disease-control agents have accelerated efforts toward searching for alternative candidates with a low propensity for resistance development. In this study, a new series of stilbene-based peptoid mimics were synthesized, and their biological activities were evaluated against citrus pathogenic bacteria in vitro and in vivo.

RESULTS

Antibacterial bioassay results showed that the dicationic peptoid mimics 9a and 9b displayed excellent bioactivity against Xanthomonas citri pv. citri, with the minimum inhibitory concentration values of 25 μM, which were superior to those of commercial copper biocides Delite (200 μM) and Kasumin Bordeaux (100 μM). In vivo bioassay further confirmed their control efficacy against plant bacterial diseases. In addition, the antibacterial mechanism of action elucidated their membrane-disruption effects resulting in the leakage of the bacterial membranes, which was similar to that of antimicrobial peptides. Moreover, the inhibition effect on biofilm formation of peptoid mimics has also been demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

Stilbene-based peptoid mimics synthesized in this study showed promising antibacterial activity with a potent membrane-disruptive mechanism. The results suggested that stilbene-based peptoid mimics have the potential as a candidate new type of bactericide for citrus disease protection.