Manipulation of the adsorption of ionic surfactants onto hydrophilic silica using polyelectrolytes

Effects of surface oxidation on the pH-dependent surface charge of oxidized aluminum gallium nitride

HYPOTHESIS

The properties of the oxidized surface for common materials, such as silicon and titanium, are known to be markedly different from the reduced surface. We hypothesize that surface-oxidized aluminum gallium nitride ((oxidized-AlGaN)/GaN) surface charge behavior is different to unoxidized AlGaN (with ultrathin native oxide only), which can be validated via surfactant adsorption. Understanding these differences will explain why (oxidized-AlGaN)/GaN-based sensors are better performing than AlGaN ones, which has been previously demonstrated but not understood.

EXPERIMENTS

The surface of an AlGaN/GaN structure was oxidized with hot piranha solution and oxygen plasma. AFM force measurements and imaging were performed to probe the charge properties of the surface in aqueous solutions of varying pH containing only an acid or base, or with an added ionic surfactant: cationic cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) or anionic sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS).

FINDINGS

The (oxidized-AlGaN)/GaN surface is positively charged at pH 4 and pH 5.5, although pH 5.5 should be close to the isoelectric point of the surface. The surface is negatively charged at pH 10 and pH 12, and sufficiently charged to attract cooperative adsorption of CTAB aggregates at pH 12. At pH 2, the evidence is inconclusive, but the surface is most likely positively charged. Compared to unoxidized AlGaN, the (oxidized-AlGaN)/GaN surface shows a wider range of surface charge magnitude over pH values between 2 and 12. This suggests that the (oxidized-AlGaN)/GaN surface has a higher surface hydroxyl group density than unoxidized AlGaN, which explains the higher sensitivity for pH sensors based on (oxidized-AlGaN)/GaN structures.

Influence of synthetic wastewater on entrapped air on the isotactic and atactic polypropylene microplastic surfaces

The municipal wastewater collection system is recognized as an initial point of interaction between microplastics (MPs) and the urban wastewater matrix. The raw wastewater contains a wide variety of organic and inorganic substances including chemicals and heavy metals. However, the fate of MPs in urban sewer systems is not yet well understood. In this work two types of virgin polypropylene (PP) samples, isotactic (iPP) and atactic (aPP), were exposed to two synthetic wastewater solutions in order to study their effects on the physical properties of the hydrophobic polymer surfaces. Particular attention was paid to the pollution adhesion at the air-liquid-solid interfaces of the surface air pockets entrapped on the polymer surfaces. The first wastewater solution consists of mixed fat, oil and grease (FOG) - surfactant and another which is an exclusively contained wastewater surfactant. The interaction experiment over a period of 10 min between the polymer's air pocket and solutions indicated that the size of the bubble in the mixed FOG-surfactant solution increased more pronouncedly for iPP (%152) in contrast to aPP (%31) and was also compared with the greater surface roughness of the polymers. The size variation of the spherical cap on the immersed polymer surfaces were measured between 17 µm and 85 µm using image processing techniques while the data was analyzed by the Young-Laplace equation. The corresponding technical surface roughness of the polymers, the surface tension of the liquids and their air/water contact angle on the flat polymer surfaces were also measured. The results of this study indicated that surface air pockets influence the adsorption capacity of MPs and thus their buoyancy and contamination potential.

Multilayering of Calcium Aerosol-OT at the Mica/Water Interface Studied with Neutron Reflection: Formation of a Condensed Lamellar Phase at the CMC

Using specular neutron reflection, the adsorption of sodium and calcium salts of the surfactant bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate (Aerosol-OT or AOT) has been studied at the mica/water interface at concentrations between 0.1 and 2 CMC. The pH dependence of the adsorption was also probed. No evidence of the adsorption of Na(AOT) was found even at the critical micelle concentration (CMC) while the calcium salt was found to adsorb significantly at concentrations of 0.5 CMC and above. This interesting and somewhat unexpected finding demonstrates that counterion identity may be used to tune the adsorption of anionic surfactants on anionic surfaces. At the CMC, three condensed bilayers of Ca(AOT)₂ were adsorbed at pH 7 and 9 and four bilayers adsorbed at pH 4. Multilayering at the CMC of Ca(AOT)₂ on the mica surface is an unusual feature of this surfactant/surface combination. Only single bilayer adsorption has been observed at other surfaces at the CMC. We suggest this arises from the high charge density of mica which must provide an excellent template for the surfactant.

Co-adsorption of peptide amphiphile V(6)K and conventional surfactants SDS and C(12)TAB at the solid/water interface

Recent research has reported many attractive benefits from short peptide amphiphiles. A practical route for them to enter the real world of applications is through formulation with conventional surfactants. This study reports the co-adsorption of the surfactant-like peptide, V6K, with conventional anionic and cationic surfactants at the solid/water interface. The time-dependant adsorption behaviour was examined using spectroscopic ellipsometry whilst adsorbed layer composition and structural distribution of the components were investigated by neutron reflection with the use of hydrogen/deuterium labelling of the surfactant molecules. Both binary (surfactant/peptide mixtures) and sequential (peptide followed by surfactant) adsorption have been studied. It was found that at the hydrophilic SiO2/water interface, the peptide was able to form a stable, flat, defected bilayer structure however both the structure and adsorbed amount were highly dependent on the initial peptide concentration. This consequently affected surfactant adsorption. In the presence of a pre-adsorbed peptide layer anionic sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) could readily co-adsorb at the interface; however, cationic dodecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (C12TAB) could not co-adsorb due to the same charge character. However on a trimethoxy octyl silane (C8) coated hydrophobic surface, V6K formed a monolayer, and subsequent exposure to cationic and anionic surfactants both led to some co-adsorption at the interface. In binary surfactant/peptide mixtures, it was found that adsorption was dependent on the molar ratio of the surfactant and peptide. For SDS mixtures below molar unity and concentrations below CMC for C12TAB, V6K was able to dominate adsorption at the interface. Above molar unity, no adsorption was detected for SDS/V6K mixtures. In contrast, C12TAB gradually replaced the peptide and became dominant at the interface. These results thus elucidate the adsorption behaviour of V6K, which was found to dominate interfacial adsorption but its exact adsorbed amount and distribution were affected by interfacial hydrophobicity and interactions with conventional surfactants.

Adsorption and viscoelastic analysis of polyelectrolyte-surfactant complexes on charged hydrophilic surfaces

The aggregation of surfactants around oppositely charged polyelectrolytes brings about a peculiar bulk phase behavior of the complex, known as coacervation, and can control the extent of adsorption of the polyelectrolyte at an aqueous-solid interface. Adsorption kinetics from turbid premixed polyelectrolyte-surfactant mixtures have been difficult to measure using optical techniques such as ellipsometry and reflectometry, thus limiting the correlation between bulk phases and interfacial adsorption. Here, we investigated the adsorption from premixed solutions of a cationic polysaccharide (PQ10) and the anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) on an amphoteric alumina surface using quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCMD). The surface charge on the alumina was tuned by changing the pH of the premixed solutions, allowing us to assess the role of electrostatic interactions by studying the adsorption on both negatively and positively charged surfaces. We observed a maximum extent of adsorption on both negatively and positively charged surfaces from a solution corresponding to the maximum turbidity. Enhanced adsorption upon diluting the redissolved complexes at a high SDS concentration was seen only on the negatively charged surface, and not on the positively charged one, confirming the importance of electrostatic interactions in controlling the adsorption on a hydrophilic charged surface. Using the Voight based viscoelastic model, QCMD also provided information on the effective viscosity, effective shear modulus, and thickness of the adsorbed polymeric complex. The findings of viscoelastic analysis, corroborated by atomic force microscopy measurements, suggest that PQ10 by itself forms a flat, uniform layer, rigidly attached to the surface. The PQ10-SDS complex shows a heterogeneous surface structure, where the underlayer is relatively compact and tightly attached and the top is a loosely bound diffused overlayer, accounting for most of the adsorbate, which gets washed away upon rinsing. Understanding of the surface structure will have important implications toward understanding lubrication.

Interactions of PAMAM dendrimers with SDS at the solid-liquid interface

This work addresses structural and nonequilibrium effects of the interactions between well-defined cationic poly(amidoamine) PAMAM dendrimers of generations 4 and 8 and the anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at the hydrophilic silica-water interface. Neutron reflectometry and quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring were used to reveal the adsorption from premixed dendrimer/surfactant solutions as well as sequential addition of the surfactant to preadsorbed layers of dendrimers. PAMAM dendrimers of both generations adsorb to hydrophilic silica as a compact monolayer, and the adsorption is irreversible upon rinsing with salt solution. SDS adsorbs on the dendrimer layer and at low bulk concentrations causes the expansion of the dendrimer layers on the surface. When the bulk concentration of SDS is increased, the surfactant layer consists of aggregates or bilayer-like structures. The adsorption of surfactant is reversible upon rinsing, but slight changes of the structure of the preadsorbed PAMAM monolayer were observed. The adsorption from premixed solutions close to charge neutrality results in thick multilayers, but the surface excess is lower when the bulk complexes have a net negative charge. A critical examination of the pathway of adsorption for the interactions of SDS with preadsorbed PAMAM monolayers and premixed PAMAM/SDS solutions with hydrophilic silica revealed that nonequilibrium effects are important only in the latter case, and the application of a thermodynamic model to such experimental data would be inappropriate.

Cation bridging studied by specular neutron reflection

The binding of an anionic surfactant onto an anionic surface by addition of divalent ions is reported based on experimental data from specular neutron reflection (NR) and attenuated total internal reflection IR spectroscopy (ATR-IR). Similar measurements using monovalent ions (sodium) do not show any evidence of such adsorption, even though the amount of surfactant can be much higher. This data is interpreted in terms of the so-called bridging mechanism of ion binding.

Influence of calcium ions on rhamnolipid and rhamnolipid/anionic surfactant adsorption and self-assembly

The impact of Ca(2+) counterions on the adsorption at the air-water interface and self-assembly in aqueous solution of the rhamnolipid biosurfactant and its mixture with the anionic surfactant sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, LAS, has been studied using neutron reflectometry and small-angle neutron scattering. The results illustrate how rhamnolipids are calcium tolerant and how their blending with conventional anionic surfactants improves the calcium tolerance of the anionic surfactant. Ca(2+) has relatively little effect upon the adsorption and self-assembly of the monorhamnose, R1, and dirhamnose, R2, rhamnolipids, even at high pH, due to their predominantly nonionic nature. For R1/R2 mixtures the addition of Ca(2+) has little impact upon the adsorbed amount or the surface composition. For R2/LAS mixtures the addition of Ca(2+) results in an increased adsorption and a surface slightly richer in R2. The weak binding of Ca(2+) to R1 and R2 does result in a change to the degree of ionization of the micelles and especially for mixed R1/R2 micelles at R1-rich solution compositions. The stronger binding of Ca(2+) to LAS results in the addition of Ca(2+) having a much greater impact on the self-assembly of R1/LAS and R2/LAS mixtures. For R1/LAS mixtures the addition of Ca(2+) promotes the formation of more planar structures, even at low surfactant concentrations where in the absence of Ca(2+) mixed globular micelle formation dominates. In R2/LAS mixtures, where there is a greater contrast between the high and low preferred curvatures associated with R2 and LAS, the addition of Ca(2+) results in a more complex evolution in micellar aggregation and the degree of ionization of the micelles. This results in variations in Ca(2+) binding that promotes micellar structures in which a spatial segregation of the two surfactant components within the micelle occurs.

How electrolyte and polyelectrolyte affect the adsorption of the anionic surfactant SDS onto the surface of a cellulose thin film and the structure of the cellulose film. 1. Hydrophobic cellulose

The nature of hydrophobic thin cellulose films, formed by Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) deposition on silica, has been studied using neutron reflectivity (NR). The impact of electrolyte and a polyelectrolyte, poly(dimethyldiallylammonium chloride) (polydmdaac), on the adsorption of the anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) onto the surface of the hydrophobic cellulose film and upon the structure of the cellulose film has been investigated. The results show how a combination of polyelectrolytes and electrolyte can be used to manipulate surfactant adsorption onto hydrophobic cellulose surfaces and modify the structure of the cellulose film by swelling and penetration. The results illustrate how polyelectrolytes can be used to reverse adsorption and swelling of cellulose films which are not reversible simply by dilution in solvent.

Interaction of the anionic surfactant SDS with a cellulose thin film and the role of electrolyte and poyelectrolyte. 2 Hydrophilic cellulose

The interaction of the anionic surfactant, sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS), with the hydrophilic surface of a thin cellulose film and the role of electrolyte (0.1 M NaCl) and the polyelectrolyte, poly(dimethyldiallyl ammonium chloride) [polydmdaac], have been studied by neutron reflectivity (NR). The thin cellulose films were prepared by Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) deposition of trimethylsilyl-cellulose (TMSC) on silicon, and the hydrophilic surface was produced by the cleaving of the terminal methyl groups of the TMSC by HCl vapor. Despite both the surfactant and cellulose surfaces being nominally anionic, SDS adsorption and swelling of the cellulose film occurred during adsorption. The results show that the nature of the adsorption and the extent of the penetration into the cellulose film can be controlled by the addition of electrolyte, NaCl, and cationic polyelectrolyte, polydmdaac.

Surface deposition and phase behavior of oppositely charged polyion-surfactant ion complexes. Delivery of silicone oil emulsions to hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces

The adsorption from mixed polyelectrolyte-surfactant solutions at hydrophobized silica surfaces was investigated by in situ null-ellipsometry, and compared to similar measurements for hydrophilic silica surfaces. Three synthetic cationic copolymers of varying hydrophobicity and one cationic hydroxyethyl cellulose were compared in mixtures with the anionic surfactant sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) in the absence or presence of a dilute silicone oil emulsion. The adsorption behavior was mapped while stepwise increasing the concentration of SDS to a polyelectrolyte solution of constant concentration. The effect on the deposition of dilution of the bulk solution in contact with the surface was also investigated by gradual replacement of the bulk solution with 1 mM aqueous NaCl. An adsorbed layer remained after complete exchange of the polyelectrolyte/surfactant solution for aqueous NaCl. In most cases, there was a codeposition of silicone oil droplets, if such droplets were present in the formulation before dilution. The overall features of the deposition were similar at hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces, but there were also notable differences. SDS molecules adsorbed selectively at the hydrophobized silica surface, but not at the hydrophilic silica, which influenced the coadsorption of the cationic polymers. The largest amount of deposited material after dilution was found for hydrophilic silica and for the least-hydrophobic cationic polymers. For the least-hydrophobic polyions, no significant codeposition of silicone oil was detected at hydrophobized silica after dilution if the initial SDS concentration was high.

Modifying the adsorption properties of anionic surfactants onto hydrophilic silica using the pH dependence of the polyelectrolytes PEI, ethoxylated PEI, and polyamines

The manipulation of the adsorption of the anionic surfactant, sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS, onto hydrophilic silica by the polyelectrolytes, polyethyleneimine, PEI, ethoxylated PEI, and the polyamine, pentaethylenehexamine, has been studied using neutron reflectometry. The adsorption of a thin PEI layer onto hydrophilic silica promotes a strong reversible adsorption of the SDS through surface charge reversal induced by the PEI at pH 7. At pH 2.4, a much thicker adsorbed PEI layer is partially swelled by the SDS, and the SDS adsorption is now no longer completely reversible. At pH 10, there is some penetration of SDS and solvent into a thin PEI layer, and the SDS adsorption is again not fully reversible. Ethoxylation of the PEI (PEI-EO(1) and PEI-EO(7)) results in a much weaker and fragile PEI and SDS adsorption at both pH 3 and pH 10, and both polymer and surfactant desorb at higher surfactant concentrations (>critical micellar concentration, cmc). For the polyamine, pentaethylenehexamine, adsorption of a layer of intermediate thickness is observed at pH 10, but at pH 3, no polyamine adsorption is evident; and at both pH 3 and pH 10, no SDS adsorption is observed. The results presented here show that, for the amine-based polyelectrolytes, polymer architecture, molecular weight, and pH can be used to manipulate the surface affinity for anionic surfactant (SDS) adsorption onto polyelectrolyte-coated hydrophilic silica surfaces.

Surface adsorption and phase separation of oppositely charged polyion-surfactant ion complexes: 3. Effects of polyion hydrophobicity

The adsorption to hydrophilic silica surfaces in relation to the bulk phase behavior was investigated by in situ null ellipsometry and bulk turbidity measurements for four cationic copolymers of varying hydrophobicity in mixtures with anionic surfactant sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS). The purpose was to reveal the effect of polyion hydrophobicity on the association with surfactant at surfaces and in the bulk. All polyelectrolytes contained 20 wt % cationic units and had similar molecular weights. An increase in surfactant concentration by the stepwise addition of SDS to a dilute polyelectrolyte solution led to an increase in both the adsorbed amount and bulk turbidity, starting at a defined SDS concentration, as a result of the formation of insoluble polyion-surfactant ion complexes. At some higher SDS concentration, the formed aggregates started to redissolve gradually in the bulk and desorb from the surface because of the overcharging of the complexes. The SDS concentration at which the maxima in adsorption and turbidity occurred increased with decreasing polyion hydrophobicity; the more hydrophobic polyions bound excess SDS more readily, and the aggregates therefore redissolved at a lower SDS concentration. The adsorption from polyelectrolyte-SDS solutions, premixed at SDS concentrations above the adsorption maximum, which occurred on diluting the solution by "rinsing" the ellipsometer cuvette with 1 mM NaCl, was also investigated. On dilution, both the turbidity and the adsorbed amount increased as the excess surfactant in the polyion-surfactant ion complexes progressively decreased. More efficient deposition was achieved if the initial SDS concentration was close to the adsorption maximum. The latter situation could be achieved either by adjusting the SDS concentration or, at a fixed SDS concentration, by choosing a polyion with the appropriate hydrophobicity.

Quantitative in situ attenuated total internal reflection Fourier transform infrared study of the isotherms of poly(sodium 4-styrene sulfonate) adsorption to a TiO2 surface over a range of cetylpyridinium bromide monohydrate concentration

Quantitative in situ attenuated total internal reflection Fourier transform infrared (ATR FTIR) spectroscopy has been used to study the isotherm of poly(sodium 4-styrene sulfonate), PSS, adsorption to a TiO(2) surface in aqueous solution at a pH of 3.5. The effect of adding surfactant cetylpyridinium bromide monohydrate (CPBM) on the adsorption isotherm of PSS was investigated at CPBM concentrations of 3.60 x 10(-7), 1.02 x 10(-5), and 1.04 x 10(-4) M. The use of in situ ATR FTIR allowed for the calculation of the concentration of both PSS and CPBM at the TiO(2)/water interface over the entire course of all experiments. It was found that the addition of a small amount of CPBM, 3.60 x 10(-7) M, to PSS solutions resulted in 23 +/- 3% less PSS accumulating at the TiO(2)/water interface compared to isotherm studies with no CPBM present. The mole ratio of CPBM to PSS varies from 4 +/- 1 to 1 to 20 +/- 4 to 1 in a stepwise manner as the solution concentration of PSS is increased for solutions with a CPBM concentration of 3.60 x 10(-7). The addition of CPBM at concentrations of 1.02 x 10(-5) and 1.04 x 10(-4) M showed distinct differences in the behavior of the PSS isotherm, but at the highest solution PSS concentrations, the amount of PSS at the TiO(2)/water interface compared to that of PSS solutions with no CPBM added is indistinguishable within the experimental uncertainties. For these higher concentrations of CPBM, both PSS and CPBM appear to come to the TiO(2) surface as aggregates and the mole ratio of CPBM to PSS at the TiO(2)/water interface decreases as the concentration of PSS is increased. For a CPBM concentration of 1.02 x 10(-5) M, the mole ratio of CPBM to PSS changes from 139 +/- 29 to 1 to 33 +/- 7 to 1 as the solution PSS concentration is increased. For a CPBM concentration of 1.04 x 10(-4) M, the mole ratio of CPBM to PSS changes from 630 +/- 130 to 1 to 110 +/- 21 to 1 as the solution PSS concentration is increased. Despite the large differences in the CPBM to PSS mole ratios, the amount of PSS that adsorbs to the surface is statistically indistinguishable for CPBM concentrations of 0, 1.02 x 10(-5), and 1.04 x 10(-4) M, indicating that the structure of the PSS molecules in each of the systems does not significantly change in the presence of CPBM.

Adsorption studies of a polymerizable surfactant by optical reflectivity and quartz crystal microbalance

A quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) and an optical reflectometer (OR) have been used to investigate the adsorption behavior of two different variants of the surfactant-hydrotropic counterion system, alkane trimethylammonium vinylbenzoate (CnTVB), onto silica surfaces. The C18TVB variant, with a longer hydrocarbon tail, produced a three-stage adsorption isotherm in the OR, whereas the C16TVB surfactant showed a two-stage adsorption isotherm. This was explained in terms of the greater degree of hydrophobicity of the C18 carbon chain requiring a significantly higher concentration of surfactant to be present on the surface before any further adsorption can occur. A concentration dependent adsorption rate was observed for both surfactants, with the faster adsorption rate being detected for C18TVB. The OR data showed that each surfactant could be completely rinsed off with the flow of water into the OR cell. This was not observed with the QCM data, where only a partial rinse off was seen. The difference between the two techniques was hypothesized to be due to the ability of the QCM to detect both interfacial and bulk behavior thus complicating the interpretation of the adsorption data.

Interactions between chitosan and SDS at a low-charged silica substrate compared to interactions in the bulk--the effect of ionic strength

The effect of ionic strength on association between the cationic polysaccharide chitosan and the anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS, has been studied in bulk solution and at the solid/liquid interface. Bulk association was probed by turbidity, electrophoretic mobility, and surface tension measurements. The critical aggregation concentration, cac, and the saturation binding of surfactants were estimated from surface tension data. The number of associated SDS molecules per chitosan segment exceeded one at both salt concentrations. As a result, a net charge reversal of the polymer-surfactant complexes was observed, between 1.0 and 1.5 mM SDS, independent of ionic strength. Phase separation occurs in the SDS concentration region where low charge density complexes form, whereas at high surfactant concentrations (up to several multiples of cmc SDS) soluble aggregates are formed. Ellipsometry and QCM-D were employed to follow adsorption of chitosan onto low-charged silica substrates, and the interactions between SDS and preadsorbed chitosan layers. A thin (0.5 nm) and rigid chitosan layer was formed when adsorbed from a 0.1 mM NaNO3 solution, whereas thicker (2 nm) chitosan layers with higher dissipation/unit mass were formed from solutions at and above 30 mM NaNO3. The fraction of solvent in the chitosan layers was high independent of the layer thickness and rigidity and ionic strength. In 30 mM NaNO3 solution, addition of SDS induced a collapse at low concentrations, while at higher SDS concentrations the viscoelastic character of the layer was recovered. Maximum adsorbed mass (chitosan + SDS) was reached at 0.8 times the cmc of SDS, after which surfactant-induced polymer desorption occurred. In 0.1 mM NaNO3, the initial collapse was negligible and further addition of surfactant lead to the formation of a nonrigid, viscoelastic polymer layer until desorption began above a surfactant concentration of 0.4 times the cmc of SDS.

Surfactant adsorption onto cellulose surfaces

The adsorption of the cationic surfactant, hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide, C16TAB, onto model cellulose surfaces, prepared by Langmuir-Blodgett deposition as thin films, has been investigated by neutron reflectivity. Comparison between the adsorption of C16TAB onto hydrophilic silica, a hydrophobic cellulose surface, and a regenerated (hydrophilic) cellulose surface is made. Adsorption onto the hydrophilic silica and onto the hydrophilic cellulose surfaces is similar, and is in the form of surface aggregates. In contrast, the adsorption onto the hydrophobic cellulose surface is lower and in the form of a monolayer. The impact of the surfactant adsorption and the in situ surface regeneration on the structure of the cellulose thin films and the nature of solvent penetration into the cellulose films are also investigated. For the hydrophobic cellulose surface, intermixing between the cellulose and surfactant occurs, whereas there is little penetration of surfactant into the hydrophilic cellulose surface. Measurements show that solvent exchange between the partially hydrated cellulose film and the solution is slow on the time scale of the measurements.

Polymer-surfactant complexation in polyelectrolyte multilayer assemblies

Layer-by-layer self-assembly can be used to incorporate amphiphilic molecules into multilayered polyelectrolyte architectures. This review examines equilibrium LbL assemblies constructed by direct adsorption from aqueous solution. LbL systems have not only provided fundamental insight into the nature of polyion-surfactant complexation, but have also yielded functional materials with useful surface, optical, and electronic properties.

Formation of polyelectrolyte-surfactant complexes on surfaces

The interfacial behavior of polyelectrolytes, mainly cationic with varying content of amphiphilic groups, and their complexes with oppositely charged surfactant are discussed. Both the kinetics and the reversibility aspect of the adsorption are considered. The structure of adsorbed layer formed was found to be dependent not only on the bulk solution phase behavior, but also on the pre-applied conditions, i.e., the path used to obtain a particular solution condition (e.g., by changing pH and concentration of salt, surfactant or polymer). Polyelectrolyte adsorption appears only partly reversible, due to its high affinity to the surface, which slows down the adsorption process. In general, relaxation occurs more easily if the direction of the process is from low to high surface coverage. Association of the surfactant with the polymer, which depends on the surfactant concentration, can completely alter the interfacial behavior. Maximum adsorption occurs generally at a surfactant concentration just before the expected phase separation region, while the complex in some cases could desorb from the surface at high enough surfactant concentration (above the cmc). Different results were obtained for coadsorption of amphiphilic polyelectrolytes when surfactant was added to the preadsorbed polymer layers and when complexes were pre-formed in the solution prior to exposing the surface to the polymer-surfactant solution.

Molecular Dynamics Study of Surfactant Monolayers Adsorbed at the Oil/Water and Air/Water Interfaces

Atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have been carried out to investigate the physical properties of monolayers of monododecyl diethylene glycol (C(12)E(2)) surfactants adsorbed at the oil/water and air/water interfaces. The study shows that the surfactant molecules exhibit more extended conformations with a consequent increase of the thickness of the monolayer in the presence of the oil medium. It is noticed that the hydrocarbon tails of the surfactants are more vertically oriented at the oil/water interface. Interestingly, we notice that the presence of the oil medium has a strong influence in restricting both the translational and reorientational motions of the water molecules present in the hydration layer close to the surfactant headgroups.

Polyelectrolyte modified solid surfaces: the consequences for ionic and mixed ionic/nonionic surfactant adsorption

This paper describes how the cationic polyelectrolyte, polyDMDAAC (poly(dimethyl diallylammonium chloride)), is used to manipulate the adsorption of the anionic surfactant SDS and the mixed ionic/nonionic surfactant mixture of SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate)/C(12)E(6) (monododecyl hexaethylene glycol) onto the surface of hydrophilic silica. The deposition of a thin robust polymer layer from a dilute polymer/surfactant solution promotes SDS adsorption and substantially modifies the adsorption of SDS/C(12)E(6) mixtures in favor of a surface relatively rich in SDS compared to the solution composition. Different deposition conditions for the polyDMDAAC layer are discussed. In particular, at higher solution polymer concentrations and in the presence of 1 M NaCl, a thicker polymer layer is deposited and the reversibility of the surfactant adsorption is significantly altered.

Adsorption of nonionic surfactant mixtures at the hydrophilic solid-solution interface

The adsorption of the mixed nonionic surfactants, monododecyl triethylene glycol (C2EO3) and monododecyl octaethylene glycol (C12EO8), at the hydrophilic silica-solution interface has been studied by specular neutron reflectivity. The adsorption at the solid-solution interface is compared with that previously measured at the air-solution interface. The marked differences that are observed are explained in terms of the different packing constraints or preferred curvature arising from the disparity in the respective headgroup dimensions.