Combination of topotecan with cytarabine or etoposide in patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: results of a randomized phase I/II study

Alternative Effective and Safe Induction Regimens for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Patients With Cardiac Contraindication to Anthracyclines

INTRODUCTION

The standard first-line treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a combination of cytarabine and anthracyclines. To date, there is no commonly agreed-on regimen for patients who are ineligible for this therapy because of cardiac comorbidities or prior exposure to anthracyclines. We compared 3 anthracycline-free regimens currently used in France.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory AML were treated intensively in 3 French centers. All patients had at least one contraindication to the receipt of anthracyclines. Three regimen types were used: fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (FLAG); clofarabine and cytarabine (CLARA); and topotecan plus cytarabine (TA).

RESULTS

Thirty patients (58%) had de novo AML. The European LeukemiaNet 2013 risk categories were favorable, intermediate, and adverse in 4 (8%), 27 (52%), and 20 (39%) patients, respectively. Twenty-four patients received TA and 28 FLAG/CLARA regimens. Fifty percent of patients had cardiac dysfunction, and 50% had prior anthracycline exposure above the maximum tolerated dose. The rate of cardiac events was similar after TA (17%) and FLAG/CLARA (25%) (P = .78). The 5-year nonrelapse mortality was 17.9% and 12.5% in the TA and FLAG/CLARA groups, respectively (P = .59). In patients with previously untreated AML, complete response occurred in 18 (72%) of 25, but median overall survival was only 9.7 months.

CONCLUSION

TA, FLAG, and CLARA regimens are efficient and are associated with acceptable toxicity in AML patients ineligible for the 3 + 7 regimen as a result of cardiac comorbidities. However, long-term outcome remains disappointing, thereby highlighting the need for the development of less toxic regimens.

Applications of Ruthenium Complex in Tumor Diagnosis and Therapy

Ruthenium complexes are a new generation of metal antitumor drugs that are currently of great interest in multidisciplinary research. In this review article, we introduce the applications of ruthenium complexes in the diagnosis and therapy of tumors. We focus on the actions of ruthenium complexes on DNA, mitochondria, and endoplasmic reticulum of cells, as well as signaling pathways that induce tumor cell apoptosis, autophagy, and inhibition of angiogenesis. Furthermore, we highlight the use of ruthenium complexes as specific tumor cell probes to dynamically monitor the active biological component of the microenvironment and as excellent photosensitizer, catalyst, and bioimaging agents for phototherapies that significantly enhance the diagnosis and therapeutic effect on tumors. Finally, the combinational use of ruthenium complexes with existing clinical antitumor drugs to synergistically treat tumors is discussed.

All-trans retinoic acid synergizes with topotecan to suppress AML cells via promoting RARα-mediated DNA damage

Background

Chemotherapy is the only therapy option for the majority of AML patients, however, there are several limitations for this treatment. Our aim was to find a new chemotherapy strategy that is more effective and less toxic.

Methods

MTT assays and a xenograft mouse model were employed to evaluate the synergistic activity of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) combined with topotecan (TPT). Drug-induced DNA damage and apoptosis were determined by flow cytometry analysis with PI and DAPI staining, the comet assay and Western blots. Short hairpin RNA (shRNA) and a RARα plasmid were used to determine whether RARα expression influenced DNA damage and apoptosis.

Results

We found that ATRA exhibited synergistic activity in combination with Topotecan in AML cells, and the enhanced apoptosis induced by Topotecan plus ATRA resulted from caspase pathway activation. Mechanistically, ATRA dramatically down regulated RARα protein levels and led to more DNA damage and ultimately resulted in the synergism of these two agents. In addition, the increased antitumor efficacy of Topotecan combined with ATRA was further validated in the HL60 xenograft mouse model.

Conclusions

Our data demonstrated, for the first time, that the combination of TPT and ATRA showed potential benefits in AML, providing a novel insight into clinical treatment strategies.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-2010-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Chemical profiling of the genome with anti-cancer drugs defines target specificities

Many anticancer drugs induce DNA breaks to eliminate tumor cells. The anthracycline topoisomerase II inhibitors additionally cause histone eviction. Here, we performed genome-wide high-resolution mapping of chemotherapeutic effects of various topoisomerase I and II (TopoI and II) inhibitors and integrated this mapping with established maps of genomic or epigenomic features to show their activities in different genomic regions. The TopoI inhibitor topotecan and the TopoII inhibitor etoposide are similar in inducing DNA damage at transcriptionally active genomic regions. The anthracycline daunorubicin induces DNA breaks and evicts histones from active chromatin, thus quenching local DNA damage responses. Another anthracycline, aclarubicin, has a different genomic specificity and evicts histones from H3K27me3-marked heterochromatin, with consequences for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cells with elevated levels of H3K27me3. Modifying anthracycline structures may yield compounds with selectivity for different genomic regions and activity for different tumor types.

Combination of cytarabine and topotecan in patients treated for acute myeloid leukemia with persistent disease after frontline induction

After a first course of induction chemotherapy, 30-40% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) do not achieve a complete response (CR). A second course of an anthracycline and intermediate-dose cytarabine (IDAC) allows a significant number of patients with persistent AML at day 14 to finally achieve a CR. We hypothesized that use of a topotecan and cytarabine combination in this setting might improve tolerance and efficacy. Cytarabine (1000 mg/m(2)/12 h days 1-4) was combined with topotecan (TA, 1.25 mg/m(2)/day by continuous intravenous infusion [CIV] days 1-4) in 31 consecutive patients with ≥ 5% marrow blasts by day 14 of induction. The median follow-up was 36 months. The CR rate was 81%, and the 2-year probability of overall survival and cumulative incidence of relapse were 66% and 38%, respectively. No unexpected toxicity was observed. Comparison with historical controls treated with the combination of a similar schedule of cytarabine and an anthracycline showed a better CR rate (p = 0.054), overall survival (p = 0.03) and cumulative incidence of relapse (p = 0.03). These results were confirmed in a multivariate analysis model. This work shows that the substitution of an anthracycline by topotecan is feasible and associated with significant efficacy for patients with AML with persistent leukemia at day 14 after standard-dose anthracycline induction.

Targeting DNA topoisomerase II in cancer chemotherapy

Recent molecular studies have expanded the biological contexts in which topoisomerase II (TOP2) has crucial functions, including DNA replication, transcription and chromosome segregation. Although the biological functions of TOP2 are important for ensuring genomic integrity, the ability to interfere with TOP2 and generate enzyme-mediated DNA damage is an effective strategy for cancer chemotherapy. The molecular tools that have allowed an understanding of the biological functions of TOP2 are also being applied to understanding the details of drug action. These studies promise refined targeting of TOP2 as an effective anticancer strategy.

Sequential topoisomerase targeting and analysis of mechanisms of resistance to topotecan in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia

Resistance to topoisomerase I (TOP1)-targeting drugs such as topotecan often involves upregulation of topoisomerase II (TOP2), with accompanying increased sensitivity to TOP2-targeting drugs such as etoposide. This trial was designed to investigate sequential topoisomerase targeting in the treatment of patients with high-risk acute myelogenous leukemia. An initial cohort of patients received topotecan and cytosine arabinoside daily for 5 days. Serial samples of circulating mononuclear cells were examined to evaluate peak elevations of TOP2-alpha protein expression. In subsequent cohorts, etoposide was administered daily for 3 days, beginning 6 h after initiation of the topotecan infusion. The etoposide dose was escalated to determine a maximum-tolerated dose. Circulating mononuclear cells were analyzed for TOP1 mutations and ABCG2 protein expression. In addition, systemic and intracellular topotecan concentrations were measured. Thirty-one patients were enrolled. On the basis of TOP1-alpha protein levels in three patients with peripheral blast counts greater than 50%, etoposide administration began 6 h after initiation of the topotecan/cytosine arabinoside infusion. Using this schedule of administration, the maximum-tolerated dose of etoposide was 90 mg/m. No TOP1 mutations were identified, but increases in ABCG2 expression during the infusion were observed in mononuclear cells from two of four evaluable patients. Administration of etoposide 6 h after initiation of a topotecan/cytosine arabinoside infusion is feasible and is associated with clinical activity. Analysis of TOP2-alpha protein levels in this small number of patients indicated that peak increases occurred earlier than expected based on earlier publications. Upregulation of ABCG2 was detected in circulating cells and may represent an inducible form of drug resistance that should be investigated further.

Topotecan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (TCE) in the treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma. Results of a phase-II trial

PURPOSE

Relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma patients still have a poor prognosis. This phase-II trial assessed a new topotecan containing chemotherapy approach in patients with active disease.

METHODS

Chemotherapy consisted of topotecan (1.0 mg/m(2)/day 168-h continuous infusion), cyclophosphamide (100 mg/m(2)/day 1-h-infusion days 1-7 starting 6 h prior to topotecan), and etoposide (100 mg/m(2)/day 1-h-infusion days 8-10). Patients with relapsed neuroblastoma were scheduled for six cycles, untreated patients for two cycles followed by standard high-risk treatment.

RESULTS

Main toxicity observed during 153 cycles were grade 3-4 leukopenia (97% of cycles), thrombocytopenia (92%), neutropenic fever (52%), and mucositis (10%). No treatment related fatal toxicity occurred. Complete or partial response was achieved in 19 of 31 (61%) evaluable relapsed patients and 8 of 11 (72%) untreated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of topotecan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide is tolerable and effective in relapsed and untreated neuroblastoma. Myelotoxicity is the main side effect but seems justified in view of the encouraging response rates. A randomized phase-III trial in primary disease has been commenced.

Topotecan and etoposide in the treatment of relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma: results of a phase 2 trial

We initiated a phase 2 trial with a combination of topotecan and etoposide (TE) in patients with relapse after intensive first line chemotherapy for neuroblastoma. TE chemotherapy consisted of topotecan (schedule A: 1.0 mg/m2/d 30-minute-infusion days 1 to 5, B: 0.7 mg/m2/d continuous infusion days 1 to 7, and C: 1.0 mg/m2/d continuous infusion days 1 to 7) followed by etoposide (100 mg/m2/d 1-hour-infusion days 8 to 10). TE was repeated every 28 days. The treatment was continued until severe nonhematopoietic toxicity or progression occurred or the treating physician chose alternative consolidation treatment after response to TE. Forty patients received 153 TE cycles. Grades 3 to 4 leukopenia was frequently observed in all schedules (A 51% of cycles, B 48%, and C 74%, P=0.141). Thrombocytopenia (A 69%, B 63%, and C 93%, P=0.004) and neutropenic fever (A 12%, B 29%, and C 37%, P=0.048) occurred more frequently in schedule C. No treatment-related fatal toxicity was observed. Among 36 patients evaluable for response, 4 patients achieved complete and 13 patients achieved partial remission (47%). We conclude that the combination of TE is effective and tolerable in the treatment of relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma.

Seven items were identified for inclusion when reporting a Bayesian analysis of a clinical study

OBJECTIVE

(1) To generate a list of items that experts consider most important when reporting a Bayesian analysis of a clinical study, (2) to report on the extent to which we found these items in the literature, and (3) to identify factors related to the number of items in a report.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Based on opinions from 23 international experts, we determined the items considered most important when publishing a Bayesian analysis. We then performed a literature search to identify articles in which a Bayesian analysis was performed and determined the extent to which we found these items in each report. Finally, we examined the relationship between the number of items in a report and journal- and article-specific attributes.

RESULTS

Our final set of seven items described the prior distribution (specification, justification, and sensitivity analysis), analysis (statistical model and analytic technique), and presentation of results (central tendency and variance). There was >99% probability that more items were reported in studies with a noncontrolled study design and in journals with a methodological focus, lower impact factor, and absence of a word count limit.

CONCLUSION

We developed a set of seven items that experts believe to be most important when reporting a Bayesian analysis.

The therapy of relapsed acute leukaemia in adults

Although the cure of acute leukaemia has improved significantly, many patients will still relapse and die. The unraveling of the molecular pathogenesis of acute leukaemia has lead to the identification of new prognostic factors and improved the detection of minimal residual disease. The treatment of relapsed acute leukaemia with chemotherapy remains unsatisfactory. Allogeneic or autologous blood and marrow transplant (BMT) can cure a subset of patients with relapsed acute leukaemia. The identification of the graft-vs-leukaemia (GVL) effect has lead to the development of donor lymphocyte infusions to re-induce remission in patients with relapsed leukaemia after allogeneic BMT and also stimulated the development of the less toxic nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplant approach. The identification of molecular targets of therapy and the development of monoclonal antibody-directed therapy has generated optimism. It is possible that combinations of chemotherapy, molecularly directed therapy, and immunotherapy may be combined to cure an increasing proportion of patients with acute leukaemia.

A new multidrug reinduction protocol with topotecan, vinorelbine, thiotepa, dexamethasone, and gemcitabine for relapsed or refractory acute leukemia

We report the results of a phase 2 nonrandomized single-arm trial of a combination therapy for relapsed or refractory leukemia. From January 1999 to June 2002, 28 patients with multiple relapsed or refractory acute leukemia received a combination of topotecan, vinorelbine, thiotepa, dexamethasone, and, for patients with an M3 marrow on day 7, gemcitabine. A total of 14 patients had pre-B-ALL (acute lymphoblastic leukemia), three had T-cell leukemia, nine acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML), and two biphenotypic leukemia. In all, 13 patients achieved a significant response (10 complete responses and three partial responses). Among the responders, five had pre-B-ALL, two had T-cell leukemias, five had AML, and one had biphenotypic leukemia. In total, 10 of these patients subsequently underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and four are alive without disease. One patient died, while in remission, of complications resulting from an episode of sepsis and pneumonia that occurred during topotecan, vinorelbine, thiotepa, dexamethasone, and gemcitabine (TVTG) reinduction. Other toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia in all patients and transient grade 2 hepatotoxicity in 10 patients (36%). In summary, we report that 47% of heavily pretreated pediatric patients with multiply relapsed or refractory leukemia achieved a significant response after therapy on the TVTG protocol. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the role of the TVTG combination in the treatment of leukemia.

A Phase I-II study of sequential administration of topotecan and oral etoposide (toposiomerase I and II inhibitors) in the treatment of patients with small cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Topotecan (9-dimethylaminomethyl-10-hydroxycampthothecin) is a new topoisomerase I inhibitor with promising efficacy in the treatment of patients with small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Combination with a topoisomerase II inhibitor may potentate the therapeutic effect of topotecan, although there has been conflicting preclinical information on the combination. The objectives of this study were to establish the maximum tolerated dose and to determine the efficacy of the sequential combination of intravenous topotecan and oral etoposide in the treatment of patients with SCLC.

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed, limited or extensive stage SCLC were eligible. The dose escalation scheme of three cohorts (six patients per cohort) started at intravenous topotecan 0.5 mg/m(2) per day for 5 days and oral etoposide 50 mg twice daily for 7 days (21-day cycles). Subsequent dose levels involved escalation of topotecan to 0.75 mg/m(2) per day and 1.0 mg/m(2) per day for 5 days. A Phase II study was conducted at one dose level below the maximum tolerated dose. The authors alternated the drug sequence with each consecutive cycle and compared the hematologic toxicity between the two sequences.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (21 patients with limited disease and 15 patients with extensive disease) received a total of 173 courses of sequential combination chemotherapy (topotecan --> etoposide, 88 courses; etoposide --> topotecan, 85 courses). The authors identified dose levels for the Phase II study as follows: topotecan, 0.75 mg/m(2) per day for 5 days; and etoposide, 50 mg twice daily for 7 days. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. At this dose level, the incidence of Grade 3-4 neutropenia and the incidence of Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia were 25% and 10.9%, respectively. Two patients died from neutropenic sepsis. There was no significant difference in hematologic toxicities between the two sequences. Complete and partial response rates were 5.6% and 55.6%, respectively (limited disease, 9.5% and 66.75%; extensive disease, 0% and 40%, respectively). The median progression free survival was 31.9 weeks (limited disease, 36.1 weeks; extensive disease, 28.9 weeks; 95% confidence interval, 25.6-36.0 weeks), and the median overall survival was 52.4 weeks (limited disease, 54.9 weeks; extensive disease, 30.1 weeks; 95% confidence interval, 39.6-57.7 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with topoisomerase I and II inhibitors is a safe and effective regimen for patients with SCLC. Future research on this combination should focus on an oral regimen for patients with extensive disease and poor tolerance to cisplatin. The authors recommend an oral dosage of topotecan at 1.2 mg/m(2) per day (equivalent to intravenous topotecan at 0.75 mg/m(2) per day) for 5 days followed by etoposide 50 mg twice daily for 7 days.

Treatment of refractory acute leukemia with timed sequential chemotherapy using topotecan followed by etoposide + mitoxantrone (T-EM) and correlation with topoisomerase II levels

A phase I/II clinical study evaluated 17 patients with refractory/recurrent acute leukemia treated with 1.5 mg/m2/day topotecan on days 1-3 followed by etoposide (100 mg/m2/day)+mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2/day) on days 4, 5 and 9, 10. Timed sequential chemotherapy using the topoisomerase I-inhibitor topotecan before the topoisomerase II-inhibitors, etoposide+mitoxantrone (T-EM) treatment is proposed to induce topoisomerase II protein levels and potentiate the cytotoxic activity of the topoisomerase II-directed drugs. Fourteen patients had refractory and three had recurrent acute leukemia. The majority of patients were heavily pre-treated with greater than three re-induction chemotherapy regimens. Ten patients responded to T-EM treatment (59%). Four of seventeen (24%) had a complete remission and one had a partial remission. Four additional patients (24%) who scored complete leukemia clearance had no evidence of disease with complete white and red blood cell recovery but with platelet counts less than 100,000. The lack of platelet recovery in one patient having a partial response was scored as a partial leukemia clearance. The toxicity profile included major non-hematological toxicity including grade 3 mucositis (29%) and neutropenic fever (65%). Paired measurements of intracellular levels of topoisomerase II isoforms alpha and beta in leukemia blast cells (bone marrow) collected before (day 0) and after topotecan treatment (day 4) showed that a relative increase of topoisomerase IIalpha (Topo IIalpha) > or = 40% strongly correlated with response after T-EM treatment. Increased Topo IIalpha levels also corresponded to increased DNA fragmentation. Two patients who had an increase of Topo IIalpha of 20-25% had either a PR or PLC while patients with a < 10% increase showed no response to T-EM treatment. We conclude that timed sequential chemotherapy using topotecan followed by etoposide+mitoxantrone is an effective regimen for patients with refractory acute leukemia, and demonstrate Topo IIalpha protein level increases after topotecan treatment.

Camptothecins

Camptothecin analogues and derivatives appear to exert their antitumour activity by binding to topoisomerase I and have shown significant activity against a broad range of tumours. In general, camptothecins are not substrates for either the multidrug-resistance P-glycoprotein or the multidrug-resistance-associated protein (MRP). Because of manageable toxicity and encouraging activity against solid tumours, camptothecins offer promise in the clinical management of human tumours. This review illustrates the proposed mechanism(s) of action of camptothecins and presents a concise overview of current camptothecin therapy, including irinotecan and topotecan, and novel analogues undergoing clinical trails, such as exatecan (DX-8951f), IDEC-132 (9-aminocamptothecin), rubitecan (9-nitrocamptothecin), lurtotecan (GI-147211C), and the recently developed homocamptothecins diflomotecan (BN-80915) and BN-80927.

Phase I study of irofulven (MGI 114), an acylfulvene illudin analog, in patients with acute leukemia

Irofulven (MGI 114, 6-hydroxymethylacylfulvene, HMAF) is a semisynthetic illudin analog with broad in vitro anti-neoplastic activity. In this leukemia phase I study, we investigated the toxicity profile and activity of Irofulven in patients with primary refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Irofulven was given as an intravenous infusion over five minutes daily for five days. The starting dose was 10 mg/m2/day (50 mg/m2/course). Courses were scheduled to be given every 3-4 weeks according to toxicity and antileukemic efficacy. Twenty patients [AML: 17 patients; MDS: one patient; ALL: one patient; mixed lineage acute leukemia: one patient] were treated. Nausea, vomiting, hepatic dysfunction, weakness, renal dysfunction, and pulmonary edema were dose limiting toxicities, occurring in two of five patients treated at 20 mg/m2/day and two of three patients treated at 12.5 mg/m2/day. The MTD was defined as 10 mg/m2/day for five days. One patient with primary resistant AML achieved complete remission. Proposed phase II studies will further define the activity of Irofulven in patients with better prognosis AML and in other hematological malignancies, both as a single agent and in combination regimens, particularly with topoisomerase 1 inhibitors.

Topotecan (hycamptin) and topotecan-containing regimens in the treatment of hematologic malignancies

Single-agent topotecan is an active drug in chemotherapy-naive MDS and CMML and, to a lesser degree, in refractory/relapsed acute leukemias, low-/intermediate-grade lymphoma, and myeloma. Its combination with cytosine arabinoside induces complete remissions in high-risk MDS/CMML. A triple-combination regimen of cyclophosphamide, cytosine arabinoside, and topotecan (CAT) was extensively tested in refractory/relapsed as well as in untreated AML. By proving effective in inducing complete remission in newly diagnosed AML at rates comparable to those achieved by anthracycline-cytosine arabinoside regimens, for example, CAT offers a useful treatment alternative. Topotecan combined with paclitaxel is promising in low-/intermediate-grade lymphomas. The activity of topotecan justifies further evaluation of topotecan-containing combination regimens, particularly in MDS/CMML and acute leukemias.