Simultaneous influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in elderly individuals

Potential impact of combined influenza and pneumococcal vaccines on the severity of respiratory illness in COVID-19 infection among type 2 diabetic patients

To retrospectively assess the impact of regular yearly administration of recombinant influenza and single administration of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines on the occurrence of serious respiratory infection including COVID-19 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Hundred patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were given Vaxigrip and Prevnar13^® vaccines and were evaluated by comprehensive clinical review, airflow screening questionnaire, and routine laboratory investigations with follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic and compared to a control group of diabetic patients with the same inclusion criteria (n = 100). After Vaxigrip and Prevnar13, there is a significant improvement in respiratory symptoms and a decrease in the airflow screening questionnaire (p = 0.0001) with a significant improvement in inflammatory parameters as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, ESR, CRP, and platelet count. Four patients had mild COVID-19 (4%), mainly gastrointestinal with no complications. Twenty-one out of 32 (65.6%) patients in the control group had severe COVID-19. The hazard ratios of significant respiratory tract infection and death due to COVID-19 were 2.29 and 10.24 in the non-vaccinated control (p = 0.001).The severity of COVID-19 in diabetes correlated with HBA1C (p = 0.007), combined Vaxigrip and Prevnar13 vaccination (p = 0.0001), serum creatinine (p = 0.001), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.001), and thrombocytopenia (p = 0.003). The present study suggested that the combination of Prevnar13 and Vaxigrip may be related to decreased occurrence of serious respiratory infections including COVID-19. Further randomized control trials may be needed to establish a direct causation between the two and clarify these associations.

Age and Location in Severity of COVID-19 Pathology: Do Lactoferrin and Pneumococcal Vaccination Explain Low Infant Mortality and Regional Differences?

Two conundrums puzzle COVID-19 investigators: 1) morbidity and mortality is rare among infants and young children and 2) rates of morbidity and mortality exhibit large variances across nations, locales, and even within cities. It is found that the higher the rate of pneumococcal vaccination in a nation (or city) the lower the COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. Vaccination rates with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, poliovirus, and other vaccines do not correlate with COVID-19 risks, nor do COVID-19 case or death rates correlate with number of people in the population with diabetes, obesity, or adults over 65. Infant protection may be due to maternal antibodies and antiviral proteins in milk such as lactoferrin that are known to protect against coronavirus infections. Subsequent protection might then be conferred (and correlate with) rates of Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) (universal in infants) and pneumococcal vaccination, the latter varying widely by geography among infants, at-risk adults, and the elderly. Also see the video abstract here https://youtu.be/GODBYRbPL00.

Quadrivalent cell culture influenza virus vaccine. Comparison to egg-derived vaccine

Influenza virus infections pose a serious public health problem and vaccination is the most effective public health intervention against them. The current manufacture of influenza vaccines in embryonated chicken eggs entails significant limitations. These limitations have been overcome by producing vaccines in cell culture, which allow a faster and more flexible response to potential pandemic threats. Given the impact of influenza B virus on disease burden, the availability of quadrivalent vaccines is useful for increasing the rate of protection from disease. This paper analyzes the limitations of the current production of influenza vaccine in eggs and the advantages of vaccines developed in cell culture, as well as their safety, tolerability, efficacy and effectiveness. Additionally, we reflect on the contribution of new quadrivalent vaccines from cell culture as an alternative in seasonal vaccination campaigns against influenza.

Recommendations for influenza and Streptococcus pneumoniae vaccination in elderly people in China

Influenza and pneumonia can be prevented by vaccination, but they remain major causes of morbidity and mortality in age-related diseases. In most areas of China, the rates of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination are relatively low and public awareness of vaccination remains insufficient. Thus, it is essential to recommend influenza and Streptococcus pneumoniae vaccination to elderly people in clinical practice. Based on recently published studies and related documents issued by several vaccination authorities, such as the World Health Organization, the National Health and Wellness Committee, the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, we propose official recommendations for influenza and S pneumoniae vaccination in elderly people in China.

Immunogenicity of simultaneous versus sequential administration of a 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine and a quadrivalent influenza vaccine in older individuals: A randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial

It is unclear whether simultaneous administration of a 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) and a quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) produces immunogenicity in older individuals. This study tested the hypothesis that the pneumococcal antibody response elicited by simultaneous administration of PPSV23 and QIV in older individuals is not inferior to that elicited by sequential administration of PPSV23 and QIV. We performed a single-center, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial comprising 162 adults aged ≥65 years randomly assigned to either the simultaneous (simultaneous injections of PPSV23 and QIV) or sequential (control; PPSV23 injected 2 weeks after QIV vaccination) groups. Pneumococcal immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers of serotypes 23F, 3, 4, 6B, 14, and 19A were assessed. The primary endpoint was the serotype 23F response rate (a ≥2-fold increase in IgG concentrations 4–6 weeks after PPSV23 vaccination). With the non-inferiority margin set at 20% fewer patients, the response rate of serotype 23F in the simultaneous group (77.8%) was not inferior to that of the sequential group (77.6%; difference, 0.1%; 90% confidence interval, −10.8% to 11.1%). None of the pneumococcal IgG serotype titers were significantly different between the groups 4–6 weeks after vaccination. Simultaneous administration did not show a significant decrease in seroprotection odds ratios for H1N1, H3N2, or B/Phuket influenza strains other than B/Texas. Additionally, simultaneous administration did not increase adverse reactions. Hence, simultaneous administration of PPSV23 and QIV shows an acceptable immunogenicity that is comparable to sequential administration without an increase in adverse reactions. (This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT02592486]).

Comparison of dual influenza and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination with influenza vaccination alone for preventing pneumonia and reducing mortality among the elderly: A meta-analysis

The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of influenza vaccination alone versus influenza plus pneumococcal dual vaccination for the prevention of pneumonia and mortality in adults ≥ 65 years of age. Medline, Cochrane, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were: 1) Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 2-arm prospective studies, or retrospective cohort studies; 2) Patients were ≥ 65 years of age with or without chronic respiratory disease; 3) Patients received the influenza vaccine alone or dual pneumococcal and influenza vaccination; 4) Results included incidence of recurrent respiratory tract infections, length of hospital stay, and overall mortality rate. The outcomes were pneumonia and all-cause mortality rates. Of 142 studies identified in the database searches, 6 were ultimately included in the systematic review, and 5 were included in meta-analysis. The number of patients that received the influenza vaccination alone ranged from 211 to 29,346 (total = 53,107), and the number that received influenza+pneumococcal vaccination ranged from 246 to 72,107 (total = 102,068). Influenza+pneumococcal vaccination was associated with a significantly lower pneumonia rate than influenza vaccination alone (relative risk [RR] = 0.835, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.718–0.971, P = 0.019), and with a significantly lower all-cause mortality rate than influenza vaccination alone (relative risk [RR] = 0.771, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.707–0.842, P = 0.001). In conclusion, the results of this study support concomitant pneumococcal and influenza vaccination of the elderly as a dual vaccination strategy is associated with lower pneumonia and all-cause mortality rates.

Seasonal influenza vaccination and technologies

Seasonal influenza is a serious respiratory illness that causes annual worldwide epidemics resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Influenza pandemics occur about every 40 yrs, and may carry a greater burden of illness and death than seasonal influenza. Both seasonal influenza and pandemic influenza have profound economic consequences. The combination of current vaccine efficacy and viral antigenic drifts and shifts necessitates annual vaccination. New manufacturing technologies in influenza vaccine development employ cell culture and recombinant techniques. Both allow more rapid vaccine creation and production. In the past 5 years, brisk, highly creative activity in influenza vaccine research and development has begun. New vaccine technologies and vaccination strategies are addressing the need for viable alternatives to egg production methods and improved efficacy. At present, stubborn problems of sub-optimal efficacy and the need for annual immunization persist. There is an obvious need for more efficacious vaccines and improved vaccination strategies to make immunization easier for providers and patients. Mitigating this serious annual health threat remains an important public health priority.

Randomized, controlled trial of a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine administered concomitantly with an influenza vaccine in healthy adults

A randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial evaluated the immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) coadministered with trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) in pneumococcal vaccine-naive adults. Participants ages 50 to 59 years (n = 1,116) received TIV with PCV13 (group 1) or placebo (group 2) (1:1 randomization); 1 month later, group 1 received placebo and group 2 received PCV13. A hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay for TIV and a standardized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for pneumococcal serotype-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) were performed and opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) titers (assessed post hoc) were measured at baseline and 1 and 2 months postvaccination. The rises in HAI assay geometric mean titer (GMT) and percentage of participants in groups 1 and 2 with ≥ 4-fold increases in HAI responses (A/H1N1, 84.0% and 81.2%, respectively; A/H3N2, 71.1% and 69.5%, respectively; and B, 60.6% and 60.3%, respectively) were similar. In group 1, all serotypes met the predefined IgG geometric mean concentration (GMC) ratio noninferiority criterion relative to group 2, but GMCs were lower in group 1 than group 2. When comparing group 1 with group 2, 5 serotypes did not meet the OPA GMT ratio noninferiority criterion, and OPA GMTs were significantly lower for 10 serotypes. PCV13 injection site reactions were similar and mostly mild in both groups. Systemic events were more frequent in group 1 (86.2%) than group 2 (76.7%; P < 0.001); no vaccine-related serious adverse events occurred. Coadministration of PCV13 and TIV was well tolerated but associated with lower PCV13 antibody responses and is of unknown clinical significance. Given the positive immunologic attributes of PCV13, concomitant administration with TIV should be dictated by clinical circumstances.

Immunogenicity and safety of seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with classic Kaposi's sarcoma

Classic Kaposi's sarcoma (cKS) is a human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8)-associated lympho-angioproliferative tumor typically occurring in the elderly. It is associated with HHV-8-driven perturbed balance of peripheral B-cell subsets, which may have an impact on immune responses to antigenic stimulation. We took advantage of the common practice of cKS patients to undergo seasonal influenza vaccination because of advanced age and analyzed the immunogenicity and safety of licensed trivalent influenza vaccine in 46 cKS patients and 44 matched controls. Licensure criteria for immunogenicity were fulfilled in both groups. Four weeks after vaccination, hemagglutination-inhibition antibody titers against each viral strain contained in the vaccine increased in patients and controls (all P<0.001). Protection against at least one strain was achieved by 96% of cKS and 91% of control subjects. Protection against all strains persisted after 12 weeks, demonstrating a long-lasting response to vaccination. The vaccine was equally well tolerated by patients and controls, as assessed by evaluating solicited local and systemic reactions to the vaccine, and appearance or increase of antinuclear autoantibodies. HHV-8 virological rebound was observed in four cKS patients, but was not accompanied by progression of KS lesions. We conclude that seasonal influenza vaccine given to cKS patients is immunogenic and safe.

Safety assessment and immunogenicity of a cell-culture-derived influenza vaccine in adults and elderly subjects over three successive influenza seasons

BACKGROUND

Adult and elderly subjects previously immunized with cell culture-derived (CCIV; Optaflu(®)) or egg-derived (TIV; Agrippal(®)) trivalent influenza vaccines were enrolled in two extension studies (E1 and E2) to evaluate safety and immunogenicity after revaccination with CCIV/TIV alone or in combination with concomitant pneumococcal vaccine (PV).

METHODS

Adults and elderly subjects (n = 2609) were randomized 1:1 in E1 and allocated 3:1 in E2 to receive CCIV/TIV. In E2, a subset of elderly subjects was randomized to receive CCIV/TIV, with or without PV. Adverse reactions were monitored for six months and immunogenicity was assessed by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay using CHMP criteria.

RESULTS

Overall, the safety profile of both vaccines was similar, no serious adverse events related to either vaccine occurred. Mild or moderate pain was the most commonly reported reaction. Reactogenicity was slightly higher in elderly subjects receiving CCIV/TIV concomitantly with PV [46% vs. 37%; p = non-significant (NS)]. Both vaccines met CHMP licensure criteria for adults and elderly subjects. With concomitant CCIV and PV, all three CHMP criteria were met for A/H1N1 and A/H3N2, whereas the B strain only met seroprotection and GMR criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Safety and immunogenicity of CCIV was not influenced by the type of vaccine received previously or by concomitant PV administration.

Streptococcus pneumoniae vaccination in older adults

BACKGROUND

Streptococcus pneumoniae infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults. Vaccination in older adults is intended to prevent S pneumoniae infections, yet little information is available regarding its efficacy in this patient population.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article was to review the current literature to determine the efficacy and tolerability of S pneumoniae vaccination in older adults.

METHODS

PubMed (1950-present) and EMBASE (1974-present) were searched using the search terms Streptococcus pneumoniae immunization, pneumococcus immunization, pneumococcus vaccine, and aged. Additional articles were identified from the reference lists of included studies. Studies were included if they reported information in older (55-<65 years) and elderly (≥65 years) adults and were related to at least 1 of the following topics: epidemiology of S pneumoniae, estimates of vaccine coverage, recommendations for vaccination, tolerability, and efficacy and/or effectiveness of vaccination against S pneumoniae.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials and 18 observational studies that evaluated the efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination in older and elderly adults were reviewed. Findings from evaluations of efficacy, as measured by clinical outcomes and immunogenicity, in older adults have been conflicting, with some subsets of prospective, well-controlled studies finding little benefit, whereas findings from several retrospective studies have suggested significant benefit. This discord may have been a result of the limited power of the prospective subanalyses to detect significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

In light of the potential clinical benefit and few reports of serious adverse events, vaccination in older adults is likely warranted. Prospective, well-controlled studies are needed to better quantitatively evaluate the benefit of pneumococcal vaccine in older adults.

Adverse reactions to simultaneous influenza and pneumococcal conjugate vaccinations in children: randomized double-blind controlled trial

In a randomized double-blind controlled trial, the safety was assessed of simultaneous administration of influenza and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in children with previous physician-diagnosed respiratory tract infections. In total, 579 children aged 18-72 months were assigned to receive simultaneous intramuscular influenza and pneumococcal heptavalent conjugate vaccinations (IV + PV), influenza and placebo vaccinations (IV + plac) or control hepatitis B and placebo vaccinations (HepB + plac) in separate extremities. Local and systemic adverse events were recorded in parental diaries for 7 days after vaccination. No immediate adverse reactions were recorded. In most children local adverse reactions disappeared 2 days after vaccination. Local and systemic reactions were more prevalent (30% and 10% more) in the IV + PV group compared with the IV + plac and HepB + plac group. These results are important for designing future vaccination schedules.

Meningococcal A vaccination response is enhanced by acute stress in men

OBJECTIVE

To determine if acute stress experienced at the time of antigenic challenge augments the subsequent immune response.

METHODS

Sixty healthy young adults were randomized to exercise (n = 20), mental stress (n = 20) or control (n = 20) before meningococcal A+C vaccination. Antibody concentration was measured by microsphere-based antibody quantification assay at prevaccination, 4 and 20 weeks post vaccination.

RESULTS

Meningococcal serogroup A antibody responses were enhanced by exercise and mental stress in men but not women (F(2,51) = 4.00, p = .02, eta(2) = 0.135).

CONCLUSIONS

Stress-induced immune enhancement has now been demonstrated in the antibody response to thymus-independent as well as thymus-dependent vaccines. These findings indicate that this effect is not specific to T-cell involvement.

Comparative reactogenicity and immunogenicity of 23 valent pneumococcal vaccine administered by intramuscular or subcutaneous injection in elderly adults

23 Valent pneumococcal vaccine is provided to the elderly through public health programs in many countries. However there is no clear recommendation regarding its route of administration (subcutaneous or intramuscular). In a randomised, observer blind study of 254 elderly subjects, the immunogenicity of a 23 valent pneumococcal vaccine was not influenced by its route of administration. A low rate of systemic adverse reactions was observed with the vaccine (subcutaneous and intramuscular both 6.3%). Local adverse reaction rates were; intramuscular 7.1% and subcutaneous 18.9% and these were predicted by: * Pre-vaccination antibody titres>1 microg/ml, odds ratio 22.4 (8.06-74.84) compared with pre-vaccination antibody titre<1 microg/ml. * Female gender, odds ratio 5.0 (1.85-14.83) compared with male gender. * Subcutaneous injection route, odds ratio 3.20 (1.13-9.13) compared with intramuscular injection route. * Female gender subcutaneous injection route, odds ratio 2.99 (1.10-8.70) compared with female gender intramuscular injection route. These data support the intramuscular injection of 23 valent pneumococcal vaccine, especially in elderly females.

Simultaneous vaccination in Japanese travelers

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous vaccination is not common in Japan because there is little information available on its effects. Some people are quite concerned about the possibility of adverse reactions due to simultaneous vaccination. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the frequency and severity of adverse effects are increased by simultaneous vaccination in comparison to single vaccination.

METHOD

A retrospective observational study was conducted in 399 asymptomatic travelers who visited the travel clinic during the period January-July 2005. One hundred forty-two participants were given a single vaccination, 257 participants were given simultaneous vaccination. Travel-specific vaccinations were for hepatitis A, hepatitis B, tetanus, rabies and Japanese encephalitis, and routine vaccines were for diphtheria+tetanus, measles, mumps and oral polio vaccine. To evaluate adverse effects, travelers were asked to complete a prepared questionnaire after vaccination.

RESULTS

Adverse effects were reported by 26.3% of travelers, with 21.8% reporting local reactions and 4.5% reporting systemic reactions. The simultaneous vaccination group reported significantly more frequent adverse effects than those reported by the single vaccination group. Particularly, tetanus vaccination was shown to significantly raise the risk of adverse effects (P<0.001). However, no serious adverse effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous vaccination was feasible for Japanese travelers because most problems were generally minor and related to local reactions at the sites of injections. Provision of a simultaneous vaccination schedule should motivate more Japanese travelers to obtain immunizations and thereby reduce the risk of vaccine-preventable diseases.

Reactions after pneumococcal vaccine alone or in combination with influenza vaccine

We studied adverse reactions to immunisation in 541 individuals receiving simultaneous pneumococcal and influenza vaccination, and in 320 recipients of pneumococcal vaccine alone. Five days after immunisation, the participants completed a questionnaire covering systemic and local reactions to vaccination. Adverse effects were rated as mild if they did not interfere with the participant's daily activities, and moderate or serious if they moderately or markedly restricted these activities. There were no differences between the groups regarding general malaise, headache, myalgias and elevated body temperature. Redness at the injection site, but not soreness or swelling, occurred more frequently in individuals immunised simultaneously with both vaccines. Except for fever and local swelling, adverse reactions were significantly more frequent in women than in men in study groups. The rate of adverse reactions was higher in individuals less then 65 years of age than in older participants. Local reactions were reported by 358 (41.6%) participants, but they were mild and soon subsided. No serious reactions were reported. pneumococcal and influenza vaccine can be safely administered simultaneously.