For which patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is prophylaxis for central nervous system disease mandatory? Dutch HOVON Group

Adrenal Lymphoma: Case Reports and Mini-review

INTRODUCTION

Adrenal lymphoma is a rare condition which may occur in one of two forms; either as primary adrenal lymphoma (PAL), or secondary to a systemic lymphoma. Primary adrenal lymphoma is a very rare diagnosis and the most common histological pattern is diffuse large B-cell non‑Hodgkin lymphoma.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we represent two examples of adrenal lymphoma, primary and secondary. In addition, we have included a mini-review of the literature regarding this rare presentation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who were diagnosed with adrenal lymphoma in our hospital. We represent mainly the most two challenging cases where adrenal surgery was required to confirm the diagnosis. We have included a mini-review of the literature (PubMed data base: 1990 - 2020) on the clinical presentation and management of adrenal lymphoma cases.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients had adrenal lymphoma in our hospital; 16 of them had secondary involvement of the adrenal gland, while the last one had primary adrenal lymphoma. Patients with adrenal lymphoma mainly present with fever, lumbar pain, and/or symptoms of adrenal insufficiency. Primary adrenal lymphoma usually appears as heterogeneous complex large masses with low density on computerized tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); however, there is no pathognomonic features to diagnose PAL. The diagnosis is confirmed only with tissue biopsy. Chemotherapy is generally the standard treatment for lymphoma, while the role of surgery is limited.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of these rare cases is generally poor with only about a third of patients achieving partial or complete remission following treatment.

Extranodal Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma: Molecular Features, Prognosis, and Risk of Central Nervous System Recurrence

OPINION STATEMENT

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) arises from extranodal organs in about 30% of cases. Its prognosis and risk of recurrence in the central nervous system (CNS) vary according to the primary site of origin. Recent studies begin to clarify these differences using molecular classification. Testicular, breast, and uterine DLBCL (as well as possibly primary cutaneous DLBCL, leg-type) share a high prevalence of the non-germinal center B cell (non-GCB) phenotype and the MYD88/CD79B-mutated (MCD) genotype. These biologic features, which resemble primary CNS lymphoma, may underlie their stage-independent propensity for CNS involvement. Management of these lymphomas should involve CNS prophylaxis, preferably using systemic high-dose methotrexate to prevent intraparenchymal recurrence. Involvement of the kidneys, adrenal glands, ovary, bone marrow, lung, or pleura usually indicates disseminated disease, conferring worse prognosis. Involvement of these sites is often associated with high CNS-International Prognostic Index (IPI), concurrent MYC and BCL2 or BCL6 rearrangements, or intravascular lymphoma-risk factors warranting CNS prophylaxis. In contrast, craniofacial, thyroid, localized bone, or gastric lymphomas have a variable prevalence of the non-GCB phenotype and lack MYD88 mutations. Their outcomes with standard immunochemotherapy are excellent, and the risk of CNS recurrence is low. We recommend individualized consideration of CNS prophylaxis based on the CNS-IPI score and anatomical proximity in cases of epidural, orbital, or skull involvement. Rituximab-containing immunochemotherapy is a standard approach for all extranodal DLBCLs. Surgery is no longer required for any primary site, but routine consolidative radiation therapy is recommended for testicular lymphoma. Radiation therapy also appears to be associated with better progression-free survival in primary bone DLBCL. Future studies should better distinguish primary from secondary sites of extranodal involvement, and investigate the association of newly identified genotypes with the risk of CNS or systemic recurrence.

Integrin alpha 10, CD44, PTEN, cadherin-11 and lactoferrin expressions are potential biomarkers for selecting patients in need of central nervous system prophylaxis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Central nervous system (CNS) relapse is a devastating complication that occurs in about 5% of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Currently, there are no predictive biological markers. We wanted to study potential biomarkers of CNS tropism that play a role in adhesion, migration and/or in the regulation of inflammatory responses. The expression levels of ITGA10, CD44, PTEN, cadherin-11, CDH12, N-cadherin, P-cadherin, lactoferrin and E-cadherin were studied with IHC and IEM. GEP was performed to see whether found expressional changes are regulated at DNA/RNA level. IHC included 96 samples of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL), secondary CNS lymphoma (sCNSL) and systemic DLBCL (sDLBCL). IEM included two PCNSL, one sCNSL, one sDLBCL and one reactive lymph node samples. GEP was performed on two DLBCL samples, one with and one without CNS relapse. CNS disease was associated with enhanced expression of cytoplasmic and membranous ITGA10 and nuclear PTEN (P < 0.0005, P = 0.002, P = 0.024, respectively). sCNSL presented decreased membranous CD44 and nuclear and cytoplasmic cadherin-11 expressions (P = 0.001, P = 0.006, P = 0.048, respectively). In PCNSL lactoferrin expression was upregulated (P < 0.0005). IEM results were mainly supportive of the IHC results. In GEP CD44, cadherin-11, lactoferrin and E-cadherin were under-expressed in CNS disease. Our results are in line with previous studies, where gene expressions in extracellular matrix and adhesion-related pathways are altered in CNS lymphoma. This study gives new information on the DLBCL CNS tropism. If further verified, these markers might become useful in predicting CNS relapses.

Discordant bone marrow involvement in non-Hodgkin lymphoma

A discordant lymphoma occurs where 2 distinct histologic subtypes coexist in at least 2 separate anatomic sites. Histologic discordance is most commonly observed between the bone marrow (BM) and lymph nodes (LNs), where typically aggressive lymphoma is found in a LN biopsy with indolent lymphoma in a BM biopsy. Although the diagnosis of discordance relied heavily on histopathology alone in the past, the availability of flow cytometry and molecular studies have aided the identification of this entity. The true prevalence and clinical ramifications of discordance remain controversial as available data are principally retrospective, and there is therefore little consensus to guide optimal management strategies. In this review, we examine the available literature on discordant lymphoma and its outcome, and discuss current therapeutic approaches. Future studies in discordant lymphoma should ideally focus on a large series of patients with adequate tissue samples and incorporate molecular analyses.

A multicentre retrospective comparison of central nervous system prophylaxis strategies among patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Background:

Central nervous system (CNS) relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a devastating complication; the optimal prophylactic strategy remains unclear.

Methods:

We performed a multicentre, retrospective analysis of patients with DLBCL with high risk for CNS relapse as defined by two or more of: multiple extranodal sites, elevated serum LDH and B symptoms or involvement of specific high-risk anatomical sites. We compared three different strategies of CNS-directed therapy: intrathecal (IT) methotrexate (MTX) with (R)-CHOP ‘group 1' R-CHOP with IT MTX and two cycles of high-dose intravenous (IV) MTX ‘group 2' dose-intensive systemic antimetabolite-containing chemotherapy (Hyper-CVAD or CODOXM/IVAC) with IT/IV MTX ‘group 3'.

Results:

Overall, 217 patients were identified (49, 125 and 43 in groups 1–3, respectively). With median follow-up of 3.4 (range 0.2–18.6) years, 23 CNS relapses occurred (12, 10 and 1 in groups 1–3 respectively). The 3-year actuarial rates (95% CI) of CNS relapse were 18.4% (9.5–33.1%), 6.9% (3.5–13.4%) and 2.3% (0.4–15.4%) in groups 1–3, respectively (P=0.009).

Conclusions:

The addition of high-dose IV MTX and/or cytarabine was associated with lower incidence of CNS relapse compared with IT chemotherapy alone. However, these data are limited by their retrospective nature and warrant confirmation in prospective randomised studies.

Ongoing challenge of optimal patient selection for CNS prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma

SUMMARY 

CNS relapse is a devastating and frequently lethal complication in patients with lymphoma, and selecting patients to receive CNS-directed prophylaxis is a common and frequently challenging decision for the clinician. Histologic subtype, anatomic location, molecular and clinical risk factors may all be used to stratify patients for CNS risk. In this paper we focus on these issues and attempt to provide practical guidance for the clinician in selecting which patients with lymphoma may benefit from CNS prophylaxis.

Guideline on the prevention of secondary central nervous system lymphoma: British Committee for Standards in Haematology

The guideline group was selected to be representative of UK-based medical experts. Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and NCBI Pubmed were searched systematically for publications in English from 1980 to 2012 using the MeSH subheading 'lymphoma, CNS', 'lymphoma, central nervous system', 'lymphoma, high grade', 'lymphoma, Burkitt's', 'lymphoma, lymphoblastic' and 'lymphoma, diffuse large B cell' as keywords, as well as all subheadings. The writing group produced the draft guideline, which was subsequently revised by consensus by members of the Haemato-oncology Task Force of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology (BCSH). The guideline was then reviewed by a sounding board of ~50 UK haematologists, the BCSH and the British Society for Haematology (BSH) Committee and comments incorporated where appropriate. The 'GRADE' system was used to quote levels and grades of evidence, details of which can be found in Appendix I. The objective of this guideline is to provide healthcare professionals with clear guidance on the optimal prevention of secondary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma. The guidance may not be appropriate to patients of all lymphoma sub-types and in all cases individual patient circumstances may dictate an alternative approach. Acronyms are defined at time of first use.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoid malignancy in adults accounting for 31% of all NHL in Western Countries. Following, morphological, biological and clinical studies have allowed the subdivision of DLBCLs into morphological variants, molecular and immunophenotypic subgroups and distinct disease entities. However, a large number of cases still remain biologically and clinically heterogeneous, for which there are no clear and accepted criteria for subclassification; these are collectively termed DLBCL, not otherwise specified (NOS). DLBCL-NOS occurs in adult patients, with a median age in the seventh decade, but the age range is broad, and it may also occur in children. Clinical presentation, behaviour and prognosis are variable, depending mainly of the extranodal site when they arise. These malignancies present in localized manner in approximately 20% of patients. Disseminated extranodal disease is less frequent, and one third of patients have systemic symptoms. Overall, DLBCLs are aggressive but potentially curable malignancies. Cure rate is particularly high in patients with limited disease with a 5-year PFS ranging from 80% to 85%; patients with advanced disease have a 5-year PFS ≈ 50%. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) and age adjusted IPI (aaIPI) are the benchmarks of DLBCL prognosis. First-line treatment for patients with DLBCL is based on the individual IPI score and age, and three major subgroups should be considered: elderly patients (>60 years, aaIPI=0-3); young patients with low risk (<60 years, aaIPI=0-1); young patients with high risk (<60 years, aaIPI=2-3). The combination of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab and CHOP chemotherapy, every 14 or 21 days, is the standard treatment for DLBCL patients. Recent randomized trials suggest that high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem cell transplant (HDC/ASCT) should not be used as upfront treatment for young high-risk patients outside prospective clinical trials. HDC/ASCT is actually recommended in young patients who did not achieve CR after first-line chemotherapy. Consolidation radiotherapy should be reserved to patients with bulky disease who did not achieve CR after immunochemotherapy. Patients with high IPI score, which indicates increased LDH serum level and the involvement of more than one extranodal site, and patients with involvement of certain extranodal sites (a.e., testes and orbit) should receive CNS prophylaxis as part of first-line treatment. HDC/ASCT should be considered the standard therapy for DLBCL patients with chemotherapy-sensitive relapse. Overall results in patients who cannot be managed with HDC/ASCT due to age or comorbidity are disappointing. New effective and less toxic chemotherapy drugs or biological agents are also worth considering for this specific and broad group of patients. Several novel agents are undergoing evaluation in DLBCL; among other, immunomodulating agents (lenalidomide), m-TOR inhibitors (temsirolimus and everolimus), proteasome inhibitors (bortezomib), histone deacetylase inhibitors (vorinostat), and anti-angiogenetic agents (bevacizumab) are being investigated in prospective trials.

EuroFlow antibody panels for standardized n-dimensional flow cytometric immunophenotyping of normal, reactive and malignant leukocytes

Most consensus leukemia & lymphoma antibody panels consist of lists of markers based on expert opinions, but they have not been validated. Here we present the validated EuroFlow 8-color antibody panels for immunophenotyping of hematological malignancies. The single-tube screening panels and multi-tube classification panels fit into the EuroFlow diagnostic algorithm with entries defined by clinical and laboratory parameters. The panels were constructed in 2-7 sequential design-evaluation-redesign rounds, using novel Infinicyt software tools for multivariate data analysis. Two groups of markers are combined in each 8-color tube: (i) backbone markers to identify distinct cell populations in a sample, and (ii) markers for characterization of specific cell populations. In multi-tube panels, the backbone markers were optimally placed at the same fluorochrome position in every tube, to provide identical multidimensional localization of the target cell population(s). The characterization markers were positioned according to the diagnostic utility of the combined markers. Each proposed antibody combination was tested against reference databases of normal and malignant cells from healthy subjects and WHO-based disease entities, respectively. The EuroFlow studies resulted in validated and flexible 8-color antibody panels for multidimensional identification and characterization of normal and aberrant cells, optimally suited for immunophenotypic screening and classification of hematological malignancies.

Phase 2 study of intrathecal, long-acting liposomal cytarabine in the prophylaxis of lymphomatous meningitis in human immunodeficiency virus-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) develop central nervous system (CNS) progression or recurrence during the course of their disease. Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-NHL often develop CNS progression despite the use of prophylaxis. Liposomal cytarabine (DepoCyte) has shown activity in lymphomatous meningitis, but there are limited data for prophylaxis.

METHODS

Between May 2006 and December 2008, a phase 2 study of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine was performed at the dose of 50 mg in 30 patients with HIV-NHL, with the aim of evaluating feasibility and activity for prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Liposomal cytarabine was well tolerated, with headache grade I to III being the most frequent side effect in 40% of patients. With a median follow-up of 10.5 months, only 1 (3%) patient developed a combined systemic and meningeal recurrence. The use of liposomal cytarabine allowed significant reduction of the number of lumbar injections in comparison to the standard schedules (around 50%), improving the quality of life of patients and reducing the professional exposure risk.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first study on prophylaxis of lymphomatous meningitis in HIV-NHL, liposomal cytarabine seems safe and active; it reduces by approximately 50% the number of lumbar punctures, and exposure risk for health staff as well.

Central nervous system disease in hematologic malignancies: historical perspective and practical applications

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) 5-year survival rates are approaching 90% in children and 50% in adults who are receiving contemporary risk-directed treatment protocols. Current efforts focus not only on further improving cure rate but also on patient quality of life. Hence, all protocols decrease or limit the use of cranial irradiation as central nervous system (CNS)-directed therapy, even in patients with high-risk presenting features, such as the presence of leukemia cells in the cerebrospinal fluid (even resulting from traumatic lumbar puncture), adverse genetic features, T-cell immunophenotype, and a large leukemia cell burden. Current strategies for CNS-directed therapy involve effective systemic chemotherapy (eg, dexamethasone, high-dose methotrexate, intensive asparaginase) and early intensification and optimization of intrathecal therapy. Options under investigation for the treatment of relapsed or refractory CNS leukemia in ALL patients include thiotepa and intrathecal liposomal cytarabine. CNS involvement in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is associated with young age, advanced stage, number of extranodal sites, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and International Prognostic Index score. Refractory CNS lymphoma in patients with NHL carries a poor prognosis, with a median survival of 2 to 6 months; the most promising treatment, autologous stem cell transplant, can extend median survival from 10 to 26 months. CNS prophylaxis is required during the initial treatment of NHL subtypes that carry a high risk of CNS relapse, such as B-cell ALL, Burkitt lymphoma, and lymphoblastic lymphoma. The use of CNS prophylaxis in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is controversial because of the low risk of CNS relapse ( approximately 5%) in this population. In this article, we review current and past practice of intrathecal therapy in ALL and NHL and the risk models that aim to identify predictors of CNS relapse in NHL.

CNS events in elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma treated with modern chemotherapy (CHOP-14) with or without rituximab: an analysis of patients treated in the RICOVER-60 trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL)

One thousand two hundred twenty-two patients treated in the Rituximab with CHOP over age 60 years (RICOVER-60) trial were examined for central nervous system (CNS) disease developing during first-line therapy or after a complete or partial remission had been achieved. Patients received 6 or 8 courses of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone) administered every 2 weeks (CHOP-14) with or without rituximab. CNS prophylaxis for patients with involvement of bone marrow, testes, upper neck, or head consisted of intrathecal (i.th.) methotrexate (days 1 and 5 of first 2 courses). Fifty-eight cases of lymphoma in the CNS were observed (36/609 patients in the CHOP-14 and 22/608 patients in the arituximab–CHOP-14 [R-CHOP–14] arm). The estimated 2-year incidence of CNS disease was 6.9% (confidence interval [CI] 4.5; 9.3) after CHOP-14 and 4.1% (CI 2.3; 5.9) after R-CHOP–14. R-CHOP reduced the relative risk for CNS disease to 0.58 (95% CI 0.3; 1.0, P = .046). Cox regression analysis identified “involvement of more than 1 extranodal site” and “B-symptoms” as significant risk factors for CNS disease. Patients treated with R-CHOP–14 did not show any benefit from i.th. methotrexate. We conclude that elderly patients with aggressive CD20-positive lymphoma show a significantly lower incidence of CNS disease if treated with R-CHOP–14 instead of CHOP-14. Intrathecal methotrexate has no role in preventing CNS disease for patients treated with combined immunochemotherapy (R-CHOP–14)—with the possible exception of patients with testicular involvement. The original clinical trials are registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT000052936.

Identification of Leptomeningeal Disease in Aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Improved Sensitivity of Flow Cytometry

Purpose

Here, we evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a new 11-parameter flow cytometry (FCM) approach versus conventional cytology (CC) for detecting neoplastic cells in stabilized CSF samples from newly diagnosed aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL) at high risk of CNS relapse, using a prospective, multicentric study design.

Patients and Methods

Moreover, we compared the distribution of different subpopulations of CSF leukocytes and the clinico-biologic characteristics of CSF+ versus CSF−, patients, in an attempt to define new algorithms useful for predicting CNS disease.

Results

Overall, 27 (22%) of 123 patients showed infiltration by FCM, while CC was positive in only seven patients (6%), with three other cases being suspicious (2%). CC+/FCM+ samples typically had more than 20% neoplastic B cells and/or ≥ one neoplastic B cell/μL, while FCM+/CC− samples showed lower levels (P < .0001) of infiltration. Interestingly, in Burkitt lymphoma, presence of CNS disease by FCM could be predicted with a high specificity when increased serum β2-microglobulin and neurological symptoms coexisted, while peripheral blood involvement was the only independent parameter associated with CNS disease in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, with low predictive value.

Conclusion

FCM significantly improves the sensitivity of CC for the identification of leptomeningeal disease in aggressive B-NHL at higher risk of CNS disease, particularly in paucicellular samples.

Front-line therapy for nonlocalized diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: what has been demonstrated and what is yet to be established

The field of treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma has been in a continuous flux over the last 10-15 years owing to the introduction of new therapeutic approaches such as dose-dense chemotherapy, monoclonal antibodies and high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant. The use of clinical prognostic factors has improved our ability to predict the outcome of these lymphomas; moreover, the gene and protein expression pattern has been shown, at least in the pre-rituximab era, to be an independent and powerful prognostic indicator. This review will focus on results obtained in the last decade by large clinical trials evaluating the first-line therapy in nonlocalized diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; special emphasis will be placed on more mature results that can be indicated as 'standard' therapy. Ongoing studies addressing as yet unanswered or controversial questions will be analyzed, and preliminary data will be critically reviewed.

Brain parenchyma involvement as isolated central nervous system relapse of systemic non-Hodgkin lymphoma: an International Primary CNS Lymphoma Collaborative Group report

Isolated central nervous system (CNS) relapse involving the brain parenchyma is a rare complication of systemic non-Hodgkin lymphoma. We retrospectively analyzed patient characteristics, management, and outcomes of this complication. After complete response to initial non-Hodgkin lymphoma treatment, patients with isolated CNS relapse with the brain parenchyma as initial relapse site were eligible. Patients with isolated CNS relapse involving only the cerebrospinal fluid were not eligible. Information on 113 patients was assembled from 13 investigators; 94 (83%) had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Median time to brain relapse was 1.8 years (range, 0.25-15.9 years). Brain relapse was identified by neuroimaging in all patients; in 54 (48%), diagnostic brain tumor specimen was obtained. Median overall survival from date of brain relapse was 1.6 years (95% confidence interval, 0.9-2.6 years); 26 (23%) have survived 3 years or more. Median time to progression was 1.0 year (95% confidence interval, 0.7-1.7 years). Age less than 60 years (P = .006) at relapse and methotrexate use (P = .008) as front-line treatment for brain relapse were significantly associated with longer survival in a multivariate model. Our results suggest systemic methotrexate is the optimal treatment for isolated CNS relapse involving the brain parenchyma. Long-term survival is possible in some patients.

Metastatic neurologic complications of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Neurologic complications of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma represent challenging diagnostic and therapeutic issues. Leptomeningeal, epidural, and brain metastases are the most common neurologic complications, and each is associated with a poor prognosis. However, early recognition and intervention often result in improved quality of life and, for a subset of patients, an opportunity for longer survival.

Central nervous system involvement in mantle cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Extranodal involvement, including central nervous system (CNS), is a frequent event in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, the incidence, risk factors, and impact on outcome remain controversial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Main clinical, biological, and evolutive features of 82 patients (60 males/22 females; median age: 61 years) diagnosed with MCL (blastoid, 26%) in a single institution were analyzed for risk of CNS involvement and prognosis.

RESULTS

Most patients had advanced stage and intermediate or high-risk International Prognostic Index (IPI). Eleven patients eventually developed CNS involvement with an actuarial 5-year risk of 26% (95% confidence interval 10% to 42%). In one asymptomatic patient, cerebrospinal fluid infiltration was detected at staging maneuvers (1/62; 1.6%). The remaining 10 patients developed neurological symptoms during the course of the disease (median time from diagnosis, 25 months). Initial variables predicting CNS involvement were blastoid histology, high proliferative index measured by Ki-67 staining, high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and intermediate- or high-risk IPI. Histological subtype and serum LDH maintained significance in multivariate analysis. Treatment of CNS infiltration consisted of intrathecal chemotherapy (two cases), and intrathecal chemotherapy plus systemic treatment (seven cases). Median survival after CNS involvement was 4.8 months, patients with this complication having shorter survival than those with no CNS disease.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the high incidence of CNS involvement in MCL patients. Treatments aimed at preventing this complication are warranted.

Central nervous system occurrence in elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma and a long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Secondary central nervous system (CNS) involvement by aggressive lymphoma is a well-known and dreadful clinical complication. The incidence and risk factors for CNS manifestation were studied in a large cohort of elderly (>60 years) patients with aggressive lymphoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 444 previously untreated patients were randomized to receive 3-weekly combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone or cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, vincristine and prednisone (CNOP) (doxorubicin substituted by mitoxantrone) chemotherapy with or without filgrastim. Prophylactic intrathecal methotrexate was given to patients with lymphoma involvement of bone marrow, testis and CNS near sites.

RESULTS

In all 29 of 444 (6.5%) developed CNS disease after a median observation time of 115 months. CNS was the only site of progression/relapse in 13 patients while part of a systemic disease manifestation in 16 patients. In univariate risk factor analysis, CNS occurrence was associated with extranodal involvement of testis (P = 0.002), advanced clinical stage (P = 0.005) and increased age-adjusted International Prognostic Index score (aaIPI; P = 0.035). In multivariate analysis, initial involvement of testis remained significant and clinical stage was of borderline significance. The median survival time was 2 months after presentation of CNS disease.

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of elderly patients with advanced aggressive lymphoma will develop CNS disease. CNS occurrence is related to testis involvement, advanced clinical stage and high aaIPI and the prognosis is dismal.

Is bone marrow biopsy obligatory in all patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma?

Bone marrow biopsy (BMB) is recommended as a part of the workup diagnosis in all patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). This is an invasive procedure that is mostly stressful for the patient and very rarely is associated with severe bleeding. We suggest that the clinician needs to weigh up the potential benefit of this procedure in each case in terms of changing therapeutic approach and prognosis. We think BMB is not mandatory in every patient with NHL and suggest recommendations for which patients we should continue to perform this procedure on.

CNS prophylaxis in lymphoma: Who to target and what therapy to use

The purpose of this article is to review the current data on the risk of CNS relapse in patients with lymphoma and the efficacy of CNS directed prophylactic therapy. CNS relapse occurred in 30-50% of those with Burkitt lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma prior to the introduction of intensified regimens that include CNS prophylaxis. Most patients with AIDS-related-lymphoma receive a short course of intrathecal prophylaxis but a re-evaluation of type and targeting of CNS prophylaxis is needed. Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have a 5% overall risk of CNS relapse but a high risk sub-population can be identified on the basis of raised LDH and >1 extranodal site, testicular or primary breast involvement. CNS prophylaxis for selected patients with DLBCL may be justified by risk but its benefit is not yet proven. Intravenous methotrexate > or = 3 g/m(2) achieves therapeutic levels in CSF and parenchyma and in combination with intrathecal methotrexate would be a reasonable option for prophylaxis.

Incidence and risk factors of central nervous system recurrence in aggressive lymphoma--a survey of 1693 patients treated in protocols of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL)

BACKGROUND

Central nervous system (CNS) relapse is a devastating and usually fatal complication of aggressive lymphoma. The extent of the disease, the proliferation rate and the sites of extranodal involvement have been discussed as risk factors. We analyzed the patients treated on protocols of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL) between 1990 and 2000, evaluated the rate and prognostic factors for CNS recurrence and developed a risk model trying to identify subsets of patients suitable for future prophylactic strategies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1993 to 2000, 1399 patients [<or=60 years with normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and >60 years irrespective of LDH] were randomized to receive six cycles of combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP)-21, CHOP-14 or six cycles of CHOP+etoposide (CHOEP)-21, CHOEP-14 in a 2x2 factorial study design in the NHL-B1/B2 studies. From 1990 to 1997, 312 patients<or=60 years with an elevated LDH were randomized to five cycles CHOEP+involved field (IF) radiotherapy or three cycles CHOEP followed by high-dose BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan (BEAM) and autologous stem-cell transplantation (NHL-A study).

RESULTS

A total number of 1711 patients were initially eligible for this study, of whom 18 patients had to be excluded due to primary CNS involvement. In the remaining 1693 assessable patients, 37 cases of relapse or progression to the CNS (2.2%) were observed. The protocol asked for an intrathecal (i.th.) prophylaxis in patients with lymphoblastic lymphoma only (n=17), but overall 71 patients (71 of 1693=4.2%) received prophylaxis by decision of the treating physicians. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified increased LDH (P<0.001) and involvement of more than one extranodal site (P=0.002) as independent predictors of CNS recurrence in the NHL-B1/B2 study population. Treatment with etoposide also evolved as a prognostic factor because the risk of CNS failure was significantly reduced after CHOEP (P=0.017). Elderly patients presenting with both an elevated LDH and lymphoma involvement in liver, bladder or adrenals had an up to 15-fold risk of spread of the disease to the CNS.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of CNS relapse in 1693 patients treated for aggressive lymphomas on DSHNHL protocols from 1990 to 2000 was low (2.2%), although CNS prophylaxis was administered to <5% of patients. Thus, a general prophylaxis for all patients is not warranted, the less so since the effectiveness of i.th. prophylaxis itself is judged controversially. Increased LDH and involvement of more than one extranodal site were confirmed as independent risk factors. A cumulative 20% incidence of CNS disease in certain prognostic subgroups of elderly patients may render these candidates for i.th. prophylaxis; however, this approach would imply a potential overtreatment of approximately 80% of these patients deemed at high risk.

Thickening of multiple cranial nerves in a patient with extranodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma

A 57-year-old male became aware of a subcutaneous tumor in March 2001. Histopathological examination showed peripheral T-cell lymphoma. He achieved complete remission after chemotherapy. Later the lymphoma relapsed in the subcutaneous lesion and chemotherapy was performed again. In April 2003, he developed diplopia, dysarthria, and dysphagia. Abnormal lymphoid cells were found in the cerebrospinal fluid. An immunophenotypical study disclosed that CD2, CD3, CD5, and CD8 were positive. Rearrangement of TCR was detected by Southern blotting. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging did not detect any intraparenchymal lesions, but thickening of multiple cranial nerves was detected. These nerves were homogeneously enhanced by gadolinium-DTPA. After intrathecal chemotherapy, atypical cells disappeared from the cerebrospinal fluid and thickening of the cranial nerves was resolved. Finally, lymphoma spread to the bone marrow, and the patient died in July 2003.

Central nervous system chemoprophylaxis in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: current practice in the UK

Central nervous system (CNS) involvement in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a well-recognised complication. There is no consensus regarding indications for prophylaxis or a standard CNS chemoprophylaxis regimen. Current UK practice was evaluated using a questionnaire. A total of 223 questionnaires were sent to clinicians who administered chemotherapy to patients with NHL; 158 (71%) evaluable questionnaires were returned. The overwhelming majority of respondents used prophylaxis in all cases of lymphoblastic lymphoma (97%) and Burkitt lymphoma (96%). Ninety-six per cent of respondents required risk factors to be present before prophylaxis was initiated in cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The commonest risk factor was site of involvement (paranasal sinus 88%, testicular 85%, orbital cavity 78%, bone marrow 65% and bone 28%). Other risk factors included stage IV, high International Prognostic Index score, >1 extranodal site and raised lactate dehydrogenase levels (34%, 21%, 16% and 10%). A total of 82% did not give prophylaxis in follicular lymphoma and 90% used intrathecal chemotherapy as their preferred method of prophylaxis. The most popular regimen was 12.5 mg methotrexate with each cycle of chemotherapy for six courses. Thirty-nine per cent used systemic chemotherapy for CNS prophylaxis either alone (4%) or as an adjunct to intrathecal prophylaxis (35%). These variations in the indications and methods of prophylaxis indicate that this subject deserves further review.

Central nervous system-directed preventative therapy in adults with lymphoma

All adult patients with Burkitt lymphoma or lymphoblastic lymphoma should receive central nervous system (CNS)-directed therapy with both intrathecal and high-dose systemic chemotherapy. There is no evidence to support the routine use of prophylactic CNS-directed therapy in any specific subgroup of adult patients with 'low grade' lymphomas. There are some anatomical sites where involvement by lymphoma is associated with a higher risk of CNS relapse. These probably include testis, breast, paranasal sinuses and the epidural space. Multivariate analyses strongly support a raised serum lactate dehydrogenase level and the involvement of more than one extranodal site as the strongest predictors of subsequent CNS relapse. A high International Prognostic Index score may replace the use of the above two factors in combination. There is evidence of good efficacy when intrathecal chemotherapy and high-dose systemic chemotherapy are used in combination. It is not clear how the best balance between the 'sensitivity' and 'specificity' of the choice of patients to receive CNS-directed therapy can be achieved.

Retrospective study of prognostic factors in non-Hodgkin lymphoma secondarily involving the central nervous system

The aim of this retrospective single-center study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and outcome of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients with central nervous system (CNS) involvement and to identify prognostic factors for survival. We searched our hospital records for NHL patients diagnosed with CNS involvement from 1982 to 2004, and 43 patients were identified. The median age was 63 years (range 23-88) and the median Karnofsky performance status was 55% (range 10-90). Treatment of CNS lymphoma included intrathecal chemotherapy in 33 patients (77%), systemic chemotherapy in 25 (58%), and radiotherapy in 16 (37%). Twenty-six patients showed a CNS response. The median survival after CNS manifestation was 5 months (range 2 days-82.5+months). Nine patients achieved long-term survival. Low lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) at CNS manifestation and a CNS response to therapy were favorable independent prognostic factors for survival in multivariate analysis (p = 0.051 and p < 0.0005, respectively), whereas a young age at initial diagnosis, initial CNS involvement, an initially normal LDH, and high-dose chemotherapy for CNS involvement were significant in univariate analysis. In conclusion, long-term survival can be achieved in patients with secondary CNS lymphoma. LDH at CNS manifestation and a CNS response to therapy were significantly associated with survival.

Secondary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: Risk Factors and Prophylaxis

Patients diagnosed with diffuse large-cell lymphoma, peripheral T-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or mantle cell lymphoma (either with a high serum lactate dehydrogenase level), more than one extranodal site, or who are a high risk according to the international Prognostic Index, should receive central nervous system prophylaxis either with intrathecal or high-dose systemic chemotherapy. The appropriateness of the same prophylaxis at relapse needs to be addressed in further studies.

Incidence and risk factors for central nervous system occurrence in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: influence of rituximab

BACKGROUND

The incidence of secondary central nervous system (CNS) occurrences in diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma is not sufficiently high to warrant the use of CNS prophylaxis in all patients. The addition of rituximab increases the complete response rate and prolongs event-free and overall survival in elderly patients with such lymphoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed a cohort of 399 elderly patients with lymphoma prospectively treated with eight cycles of CHOP with or without rituximab in order to assess if rituximab decreases the risk of CNS localization. Prophylaxis of CNS disease was not part of the treatment protocol.

RESULTS

We observed 20 CNS occurrences: 12 on therapy, four after partial remission and four following complete remission. In three patients, the CNS was the only site of relapse. In a multivariate analysis, increased age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI) was the only independent predictive factor of CNS recurrence. Only three of 20 patients are alive with a follow-up of 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab did not influence the risk of CNS occurrence, possibly because of low rituximab diffusion. Direct intrathecal administration of rituximab could overcome this problem. We also confirmed that CNS occurrence is related to IPI as well as very poor prognosis of relapses occurring on therapy.

Primary Adrenal Lymphoma

Primary adrenal lymphoma is a rare extranodal lymphoma with characteristic clinical features including a high incidence of bilateral involvement, predominantly diffuse large B-cell histology, and a low incidence of extra-adrenal disease at diagnosis. Patients are most commonly older men presenting with fever, lumbar pain, and/or symptoms of adrenal insufficiency. Prolonged disease-free survival appears uncommon, which may reflect a publication bias and/or the presence of additional adverse prognostic factors at diagnosis in most patients. Given the rarity of this disease, no prospective chemotherapy studies have been reported. Unresolved therapeutic issues include the optimal chemotherapy regimen (with vs. without monoclonal antibody), the role of bilateral adrenalectomy and/or adjuvant radiation therapy, and the need for central nervous system prophylaxis, given recent reports raising the possibility of a high risk of parenchymal or meningeal relapse. Multicenter collaborative retrospective reviews and prospective trials are needed to address these issues.

Central nervous system lymphoma

Central nervous system involvement with malignant lymphoma whether primary or secondary is an uncommon but not rare complication observed in the management of patients with hematological malignancy. Its importance lies in the considerable morbidity and mortality with which it is associated and the inadequacy of therapy. In Section I, Dr. Lauren Abrey addresses the totality of the problem of primary central nervous system lymphoma, with emphasis on strategies increasingly dependent on systemic chemotherapy. In Section II, Dr. John Sandlund reviews the success of sequential clinical trials of overall therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood, identifying those patients at high risk of central nervous system leukemia and the development of a rational therapeutic strategy for prevention. In Section III, Dr. Andrew Lister discusses the issue of secondary central nervous system involvement with lymphoma and the indications for prophylaxis.

Primary breast lymphoma

Primary breast lymphoma (PBL) is a rare form of localized extranodal lymphoma. Few reports are available in the literature concerning its treatment and outcome. Of the 34 cases of PBL seen at our institution over a 25-year period, 20 consecutive cases were treated with CHOP or CHOP-like chemotherapy regimen and had adequate biopsy specimens for histological review. All these 20 PBL were of B-cell origin including one case of Burkitt lymphoma, and 2 cases of low-grade histologic type. Sixteen of the 20 patients achieved a complete remission (CR) and 2 achieved a partial remission (PR) (>75% tumor regression). Two patients had progressive disease while on therapy. With a median follow-up period of 80 months, 6 patients relapsed. Median time to relapse from diagnosis was 23 months (range, 3-41 months). Two of the relapses involved the central nervous system (CNS): isolated CNS relapse in one case and associated with other relapse sites in 1 case. The two patients who achieved a PR after chemotherapy also had disease progression to the CNS, 4 and 8 months after the end of CHOP chemotherapy. All 4 patients died of their disease 3, 6, 10 and 13 months after CNS involvement. Of the 16 centroblastic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLCL), 3 had CNS disease at relapse. Three (15%) of our study patients developed a controlateral breast relapse. Twelve of the initial 20 patients were alive, including 11 with a persistent CR, 6 patients died of their lymphoma and 2 of unrelated diseases. In conclusion, we observed a high incidence of CNS relapse in this group of localized extranodal lymphoma, strongly suggesting that CNS prophylaxis should be associated with systemic chemotherapy in localized PLB.

CNS prophylaxis and treatment in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: variation in practice and lessons from the literature

Practices regarding central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis and treatment for non-"high-grade" lymphomas are not standardized. We designed a survey to address the CNS surveillance, prophylaxis and treatment (S + P + T) habits of Ontario oncologists, to compare tertiary with community care and gauge interest in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). We mailed 145 questionnaires to oncologists/hematologists registered at the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario between 1980 and 1999. The questionnaire posed questions of S + P + T for a variety of histologies, locations and risk factors. Results showed that 49/77 respondents treated adult NHL, (19 community, 30 tertiary care). Surveillance LP's were commonly done in testicular, orbital, sinus and epidural sites of presentation (76, 69, 71, 80%, respectively), but these were less commonly prophylaxed (45, 33, 29 and 41%). HIV associated NHL received surveillance and prophylaxis by 51 and 33% of respondents. Stage IV disease, increased LDH and extranodal-sites warranted infrequent S + P. IT chemotherapy via LP was the most commonly used form of prophylaxis (74%) or treatment (84%). Twenty percent used systemic agents that cross the blood brain barrier for prophylaxis, and 45% for treatment. A vast heterogeneity of practice within and between tertiary care and community physicians' practices was documented. Ninety percent of physicians indicated willingness to participate in a RCT. In conclusion, CNS surveillance and prophylaxis in non-"high-grade" NHL is highly variable, probably because there are poorly defined risk factors, inconclusive prophylaxis efficacy and the inconvenience/toxicity of therapy. Patients at high risk by International prognostic index criteria are at an increased risk for CNS relapse. A RCT comparing standard chemotherapy with or without CNS prophylaxis in selected patients is needed.

Intrathecal chemotherapy alone is inadequate central nervous system prophylaxis in patients with intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Central nervous system (CNS) relapse of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is usually fatal despite therapy and effective prophylaxis is desirable. Patients at high-risk usually receive intrathecal (i.t.) prophylaxis, although its efficacy is unproven. We therefore analyzed the outcome of all patients with newly diagnosed "intermediate-grade" NHL receiving i.t. prophylaxis from 1991 to 1999. Twenty-six patients were identified and analyzed. All were free of CNS involvement at diagnosis with negative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology. Disease stage was IE in 7, and IV in 19, with a median of two extranodal sites involved. Serum lactate dehydrogenase was elevated in 65%, and the median International Prognostic Factors Index score was 3 (range 0-5). Anthracycline-based chemotherapy was used in all cases and included high-dose methotrexate +/- ara-C in six patients. The median number of i.t. treatments was 5 (range 1-12) and comprised methotrexate +/- steroid in 15, together with ara-C in 11. The actuarial 3-year CNS-relapse rate was 26 +/- 10%. Six CNS-relapses were observed and involved the spinal cord or brain parenchyma in two cases each, and the leptomeninges in four patients. Treatment-related variables associated with higher CNS-relapse rates (34-50%) were: delay of > or = 14 days from diagnosis to first i.t. injection, < 5 i.t. treatments, delay of i.t. prophylaxis until after attaining CR and systemic treatment lacking high-dose methotrexate +/- ara-C (each P < or = 0.17). I.t. CNS prophylaxis, as used here, was inadequate. Alternative approaches should be pursued.

Prophylactic intrathecal methotrexate and hydrocortisone reduces central nervous system recurrence and improves survival in aggressive non-hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Central nervous system (CNS) recurrence is almost invariably fatal in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Although some protocols are intended to prevent CNS disease, the value of CNS prophylaxis in patients with aggressive NHL remains to be determined.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 68 adults with NHL who had been treated uniformly with systemic chemotherapy and had attained complete remission (CR) of disease. Patients ranged in age from 15 to 77 years (median, 56 years). Median follow-up after CR was 40 months. After CR was attained, 29 patients (Group A) received CNS prophylaxis consisting of four doses of intrathecal methotrexate 10 mg/m(2) and hydrocortisone 15 mg/m(2) as soon as they could tolerate it. The other 39 patients (Group B) did not receive CNS prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Although bulky mass (45% vs. 21%, P = 0.03) was more frequent in Group A than in Group B, none of the patients in Group A experienced CNS recurrence (0%), whereas CNS recurrence occurred in six patients in Group B (15%). This difference was significant (P = 0.03). Multivariate logistic regression analysis for CNS recurrence identified no CNS prophylaxis (P = 0.01) and bone marrow involvement (P = 0.02) as independent predictors. Among patients without CNS disease, systemic recurrence occurred in 5 patients in Group A and in 11 patients in Group B (P = 0.12). The 5-year overall survival rate from CR was 80% in Group A and 58% in Group B (P = 0.05). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate from CR was 85% in Group A and 51% in Group B (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic intrathecal methotrexate and hydrocortisone injection reduces the incidence of CNS recurrence following CR in patients with aggressive NHL and improves the chance of long-term survival.

Central nervous system involvement following diagnosis of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a risk model

BACKGROUND

To determine the incidence and risk factors for central nervous system (CNS) relapse in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patient records were registered prospectively in successive patients with NHL admitted to the Norwegian Radium Hospital from 1980 to 1996. A total of 2514 patients had no CNS involvement at diagnosis and were treated according to standard protocols. The incidence and risk factors for CNS progression or relapse were examined retrospectively.

RESULTS

In low-grade (L)-NHL, the risk of CNS involvement was low (2.8%). In high-grade (H)-NHL, lymphoblastic and Burkitt's NHL patients had a high risk of CNS recurrence (24.4%) at 5 years, and prophylaxis seemed to reduce this risk. For the other patients with H-NHL, the proportion with CNS involvement at 5 years was 5.2%. Multivariate analysis identified five independent risk factors, each present in >5% of patients: elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase, serum albumin <35 g/l, <60 years of age, retroperitoneal lymph node involvement and involvement of more than one extranodal site. If four or five of these risk factors were present, the risk of CNS recurrence was in excess of 25% at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of CNS involvement in this study is comparable with the results from other large series. CNS prophylaxis is not recommended in any subgroup of L-NHL. The risk of CNS involvement among patients with either Burkitt's or lymphoblastic lymphomas is considerable and these patients should therefore receive intensive chemotherapy including systemic and intrathecal methotrexate. Patients with other types of H-NHL should receive adequate CNS prophylaxis if at least four of the five risk factors identified are present.

Central nervous system prophylaxis in haematological malignancies

Given the poor prognosis of central nervous system (CNS) involvement in haematological malignancies, management is directed towards prevention. CNS prophylaxis may take the form of intrathecal therapy, cranial irradiation, systemic therapy or some combination of these. The toxicity of these methods is an important consideration. A risk-orientated approach to the delivery of CNS prophylaxis in each disorder is required.

Primary breast lymphoma: a report of 20 cases

Limited data are available concerning treatment and outcome of primary lymphoma of the breast (PLB), especially after CHOP (cyclophosphamide, hydroxydoxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy. We retrospectively reviewed 20 consecutive cases of localized PLB seen at our institution over a 20 year period. All PLB were of B-cell origin: treatment was CHOP or a CHOP-like regimen in all patients. Sixteen of the 20 patients achieved complete remission (CR) and two achieved partial remission (> 75% tumour regression). Two patients had progressive disease on therapy. With a median follow-up of 54 months, six patients relapsed after 8-66 months. Two of the relapses involved the central nervous system (CNS) (isolated in one case, associated with other sites of relapse in the other). The two patients who achieved partial remission also had progression in the CNS, 4 and 8 months after the end of CHOP chemotherapy. All four patients have died as a result of their disease 3, 6, 10 and 13 months after CNS relapse. Of the 16 centroblastic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLCL), three had CNS disease at relapse. We also observed three (15%) controlateral breast relapses. Thirteen of the initial 20 patients are alive in CR, six patients have died as a result of their lymphoma and one of unrelated disease. In conclusion, we observed a high incidence of CNS relapse in this group of localized extranodal lymphoma, strongly suggesting that CNS prophylaxis should be associated with systemic chemotherapy in localized PLB.