A feasibility study evaluating docetaxel-based sequential and combination regimens in the adjuvant therapy of node-positive breast cancer

Taxanes for adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. Taxanes are highly active chemotherapy agents used in metastatic breast cancer. Review authors examined their role in early breast cancer. This review is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2007.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of taxane-containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for treatment of women with operable early breast cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

For this review update, we searched the Specialised Register of the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group, MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL (2018, Issue 6), the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and ClinicalTrials.gov on 16 July 2018, using key words such as 'early breast cancer' and 'taxanes'. We screened reference lists of other related literature reviews and articles, contacted trial authors, and applied no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing taxane-containing regimens versus non-taxane-containing regimens in women with operable breast cancer were included. Studies of women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias and quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Hazard ratios (HRs) were derived for time-to-event outcomes, and meta-analysis was performed using a fixed-effect model. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS); disease-free survival (DFS) was a secondary outcome measure. Toxicity was represented as odds ratios (ORs), and quality of life (QoL) data were extracted when present.

MAIN RESULTS

This review included 29 studies (27 full-text publications and 2 abstracts or online theses). The updated analysis included 41,911 randomised women; the original review included 21,191 women. Taxane-containing regimens improved OS (HR 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83 to 0.92; high-certainty evidence; 27 studies; 39,180 women; 6501 deaths) and DFS (HR, 0.88, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.92; high-certainty evidence; 29 studies; 41,909 women; 10,271 reported events) compared to chemotherapy without a taxane. There was moderate to substantial heterogeneity across studies for OS and DFS (respectively).When a taxane-containing regimen was compared with the same regimen without a taxane, the beneficial effects of taxanes persisted for OS (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.92; P < 0.001; 7 studies; 10,842 women) and for DFS (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.90; P < 0.001; 7 studies; 10,842 women). When a taxane-containing regimen was compared with the same regimen with another drug or drugs that were substituted for the taxane, a beneficial effect was observed for OS and DFS with the taxane-containing regimen (OS: HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.86; P < 0.001; 13 studies; 16,196 women; DFS: HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.88; P < 0.001; 14 studies; 16,823 women). Preliminary subgroup analysis by lymph node status showed a survival benefit with taxane-containing regimens in studies of women with lymph node-positive disease only (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.88; P < 0.001; 17 studies; 22,055 women) but less benefit in studies of women both with and without lymph node metastases or with no lymph node metastases. Taxane-containing regimens also improved DFS in women with lymph node-positive disease (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.88; P < 0.001; 17 studies; 22,055 women), although the benefit was marginal in studies of women both with and without lymph node-positive disease (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.02; 9 studies; 12,998 women) and was not apparent in studies of women with lymph node-negative disease (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.14; 3 studies; 6856 women).Taxanes probably result in a small increase in risk of febrile neutropenia (odds ratio (OR) 1.55, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.49; moderate-certainty evidence; 24 studies; 33,763 women) and likely lead to a large increase in grade 3/4 neuropathy (OR 6.89, 95% CI 3.23 to 14.71; P < 0.001; moderate-certainty evidence; 22 studies; 31,033 women). Taxanes probably cause little or no difference in cardiotoxicity compared to regimens without a taxane (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.33; moderate-certainty evidence; 23 studies; 32,894 women). Seven studies reported low-quality evidence for QoL; overall, taxanes may make little or no difference in QoL compared to chemotherapy without a taxane during the follow-up period; however, the duration of follow-up differed across studies. Only one study, which was conducted in Europe, provided cost-effectiveness data.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review of studies supports the use of taxane-containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, with improvement in overall survival and disease-free survival for women with operable early breast cancer. This benefit persisted when analyses strictly compared a taxane-containing regimen versus the same regimen without a taxane or the same regimen with another drug that was substituted for the taxane. Preliminary evidence suggests that taxanes are more effective for women with lymph node-positive disease than for those with lymph node-negative disease. Considerable heterogeneity across studies probably reflects the varying efficacy of the chemotherapy backbones of the comparator regimens used in these studies. This review update reports results that are remarkably consistent with those of the original review, and it is highly unlikely that this review will be updated, as new trials are assessing treatments based on more detailed breast cancer biology.

Docetaxel: use in non—small cell lung cancer and metastatic breast cancer and formulation update

Objective. To summarize the systematic development of docetaxel as a new and effective treatment option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and breast cancer patients, and to discuss the physical and chemical stability, compatibility with drugs commonly used in cancer patients, and administration issues with the new docetaxel formulation.

Data Sources. A MEDLINE search was conducted using carboplatin, cisplatin, compatibility, docetaxel, doxorubicin, metastatic breast cancer (MBC), NSCLC, and stability as search terms. Reference lists, bibliographies of pertinent articles, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society for Medical Oncology annual meetings were also identified and reviewed. Information related to the new docetaxel formulation was obtained from the manufacturer. The clinical literature was reviewed and analyzed.

Data Synthesis. Docetaxel has recently emerged as an active agent in the treatment of advanced NSCLC and MBC. Results of phase II and III studies of single-agent docetaxel and docetaxel combinations, both as first- and second-line therapy, have produced impressive response rates and improved survival times compared with current standards of care. Docetaxel has a unique toxicity profile that includes hypersensitivity reactions, skin toxicities, and fluid retention. Because docetaxel's toxicity profile differs from that of the platinum analogs and the anthracyclines, combinations with these agents for NSCLC and MBC are well tolerated.

Docetaxel was recently reformulated, allowing for improved stability, shelf-life, and storage requirements. Compatibility studies of docetaxel with 81 commonly used drugs in cancer patients were recently reported, showing that docetaxel is compatible with all but three drugs studied—amphotericin B, nalbuphine hydrochloride, and methylprednisolone sodium succinate—when administered as Y-site injections into existing intravenous lines. With the increasing use of this agent, the new docetaxel formulation and compatibility data should facilitate ease of administration.

Dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer

Background. Adding taxanes to anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy has shown significant improvement particularly in node-positive patients, but optimal dose and schedule remain undetermined. Objectives. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer. Methods. All Patients first received 4 cycles of epirubicin (100 mg/m²) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m²) at 2-week interval then followed by docetaxel (100 mg/m²) at 2-week interval for 4 cycles, with daily Pegfilgrastim (G-CSF) that was administered in all patients on days 3–10 after each cycle of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide infusion. Results. Fifty-eight patients with axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer were enrolled in the study, of whom 42 (72.4%) completed the regimen. There were two toxicity-related deaths, one patient due to grade 4 febrile neutropenia and the other due to congestive heart failure. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were 13.8% and 5.1%. The most common grade 3/4 nonhematological complications were as follows: skin-nail disorders (48.3%), hand-foot syndrome (34.4%), paresthesia (38%), arthralgia (27.5%), and paresis (24.1%). Conclusions. Dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel with G-CSF support are not feasible, and it is not recommended for further investigation.

Feasibility and safety of dose-dense docetaxel after conventional epirubicin and cyclophosphamide as adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Although dose-dense chemotherapy may reduce breast cancer recurrence and death, phase II studies show that dose-dense docetaxel is poorly tolerated following administration of dose-dense anthracycline-based chemotherapy mainly because of cutaneous toxicity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This pilot study was designed to explore feasibility and safety of dose-dense docetaxel after conventional anthracycline-based therapy. Treatment consisted of sequential administration of 4 cycles of 3-weekly epirubicin (90 mg/m(2)) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2)), followed by 4 cycles of bi-weekly docetaxel with pelfilgrastim on day 2 of each docetaxel cycle. Two docetaxel dose levels were planned: 75 mg/m(2) (D75) and 100 mg/m(2) (D100). Patients could only be assigned to the higher docetaxel dose if no early treatment discontinuations due to toxicity were seen, and a median relative dose intensity of docetaxel >90% among the first 5 evaluable patients was achieved.

RESULTS

Fifty three patients received 4 cycles of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC). Six patients withdrew from study before commencing docetaxel: four for toxicity, and two who declined further study participation. Eight patients, 2 in the first dose level and 6 in the second dose level, stopped treatment for toxicity after the first cycle of docetaxel and before densification. Therefore these events were not considered early treatment discontinuations. No patients required dose interruption after the second docetaxel administration. Overall 5 patients in the first dose level and 34 patients in the second dose level received 4 cycles of accelerated (dose-dense) docetaxel. No grade 3 or grade 4 toxicities occurred at the first dose level. No grade 4 toxicities occurred at the second dose level, while grade 3 toxicities occurring in >2 patients were myalgia and bone pain (5 and 8 patients respectively, 13% and 20%) and skin-nail toxicity (7 patients, 21%). No dose-reductions or significant treatment delays were required, translating to median relative dose intensity of 100% for docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), and 99% for 100 mg/m(2).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) bi-weekly after conventional EC is feasible in selected early breast cancer patients. Lack of prior exposure to dose-dense anthracycline, as well as the use of stringent criteria implemented in the treatment protocol, might explain the improved safety profile and high treatment compliance observed in this study.

Docetaxel-induced skin toxicities in breast cancer patients subsequent to paclitaxel shortage: a case series and literature review

PURPOSE

As the result of a recent national shortage in paclitaxel, some patients who were receiving or scheduled to receive weekly paclitaxel were converted to every 3-week (q3w) docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. Our institution noted higher than expected incidence of severe skin toxicity events attributable to docetaxel during the shortage period among our breast cancer patients. In this report, we summarize the clinical course of the first five cases, review the literature surrounding docetaxel-induced skin toxicity, and offer possible prevention and treatment strategies to improve docetaxel tolerability.

METHODS

The observation period for this case series was August 1 through October 21, 2011. All patients treated with docetaxel were identified from our electronic medical record. Operable stage I-III breast cancer patients who received ≥ 1 dose of docetaxel monotherapy at 75-100 mg/m(2) q3w were included in this study. The cases of grade 3-4 docetaxel-induced skin toxicities identified by the treating oncologists were then contacted and signed an informed consent through an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. Five patients (14.7 %) experienced grade 3 skin toxicity events attributable to docetaxel, a significantly higher rate than previously reported for docetaxel dosed at 75-100 mg/m(2).

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel-induced dermatologic toxicity is well characterized; nonetheless, its etiology is largely unknown and evidence-based prevention and management strategies are lacking. This report shows that the use of docetaxel 75-100 mg/m(2) q3w subsequent to dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide regimen can lead to unacceptable rate of severe skin toxicity.

A randomised feasibility/phase II study (SBG 2004-1) with dose-dense/tailored epirubicin, cyclophoshamide (EC) followed by docetaxel (T) or fixed dosed dose-dense EC/T versus T, doxorubicin and C (TAC) in node-positive breast cancer

The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of tailored and dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel as adjuvant breast cancer therapy. Material and methods. Patients with node-positive breast cancer received either four cycles of biweekly and tailored EC (epirubicin 38-60-75-90-105-120 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 450-600-900-1200 mg/m(2)) followed by four cycles of docetaxel (60-75-85-100 mg/m(2)) (arm A) or the same regimen with fixed doses (E(90)C(600) + 4 → T(75) + 4) (arm B) or docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (T(75)A(50)C(500)) every three weeks for six cycles (arm C). All patients received G-CSF support and prophylactic ciprofloxacin. Results. One-hundred and twenty-four patients were randomised in the study. In the A, B and C arm, 17% 19% and 3% of the patients had one or more cycles delayed due to side-effects whereas 24%, 5% and 15% experienced a grade 3 infection or febrile neutropenia. After the introduction of an extra week between the EC and T parts in the A and B arms, grade 3 hand-foot-skin reactions were reduced from 5 to 0.2%. Twenty-nine percent (A and B) and 20% (C) of the patients were hospitalised due to side-effects. Discussion. Dose-dense and tailored EC/T can be given with manageable toxicity and is after adjustment presently studied in the phase III Panther trial.

Combining systemic therapies with radiation in breast cancer

Over the last years, significant survival benefits for breast cancer were derived from the use of postoperative systemic therapies and radiotherapy. Although these two modalities have been extensively used, the optimal strategies of their combining remain debatable. There have been few randomized studies addressing this issue and their results are generally inconclusive. This article reviews combining systemic therapies (chemotherapy, hormonotherapy and trastuzumab) with radiation in breast cancer patients. In clinical practice, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are most commonly used sequentially but this strategy is not based on level 1 evidence. Increased cardiotoxicity and skin reactions preclude the concomitant radiotherapy and anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Further investigations are warranted to determine the safety of taxane-based schedules used concomitantly with radiotherapy, particularly with regard to pneumotoxicity. Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy with the use of selected schemes may be considered in patients with locally advanced cancer but this strategy still needs to be verified in large randomized studies. The optimal combination of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors with radiotherapy has also not been determined in randomized trials and the results of retrospective studies are inconsistent. Finally, the data on combining targeted therapies with radiation are still scarce and do not allow for meaningful conclusions.

Toxicity of dose-dense docetaxel followed by doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in a phase II study

PURPOSE

In order to evaluate the feasibility of dose-dense docetaxel followed by dose-dense AC (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer, we conducted a phase II study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In cohort 1, 28 patients received docetaxel 100 mg/m2 followed by doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, each every 2 weeks for 4 weeks (total of 8 cycles). Enrollment was discontinued because of stopping criteria based on significant toxicity (grade 4 hematologic toxicity or grade >or= 3 nonhematologic toxicity). In cohort 2, the docetaxel dose was reduced to 75 mg/m2; enrollment was discontinued after 18 patients.

RESULTS

Significant toxicity occurred in 79% and 72% of patients in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively, resulting in treatment delays in 50% and 17% of patients, respectively. The most common grade 4 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia, which occurred in 7% and 42% of cohort 1 patients during docetaxel and AC, respectively, and in none and 19% of cohort 2 patients, respectively. The most common grade >or= 3 nonhematologic toxicity was palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, which occurred in 25% and none of cohort 1 patients during docetaxel and AC, respectively. With docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and patient education encouraging routine use of topical strategies, grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia occurred in only 11% of cohort 2 patients. Grade 2 nail changes were also debilitating and occurred in 33% of cohort 1 patients during AC.

CONCLUSION

These phase II findings suggest that dose-dense docetaxel 100 mg/m2 followed by AC is not feasible and, until more studies are conducted, should be restricted to clinical studies.

Taxanes for adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in pre- and post-menopausal women with early breast cancer. Taxanes are highly active chemotherapy agents in metastatic breast cancer. Their role in early breast cancer was examined in this review.

OBJECTIVES

To review the randomised evidence comparing taxane containing chemotherapy regimens with non-taxane containing chemotherapy regimens as adjuvant treatment of pre- or post-menopausal women with early breast cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register was searched on 9th January 2007 using the codes for 'early breast cancer' and keywords for taxanes. Details of the search strategy used to create the register are described in the Group's module in The Cochrane Library. The reference lists of other related literature reviews and articles were also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing taxane containing regimens with non-taxane containing regimens in women with operable breast cancer. Women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were collected from published trials and abstracts. Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality and the data extracted independently by two review authors. Hazard ratios (HR) were derived for time-to-event outcomes, and meta-analysis was performed using a fixed-effect model. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS); disease-free survival (DFS) was a secondary outcome measure. Toxicity and quality of life data were extracted when reported.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 20 studies, 12 of these (7 full publications, 5 abstracts) had sufficient data published for inclusion (11 for OS and 11 for DFS) in the review. The weighted average median follow up was 60.4 months. All studies fulfilled quality criteria either adequately or well. Amongst 18,304 women with 2483 deaths, the HR for OS was 0.81 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.88, P < 0.00001) favouring taxane containing regimens. Amongst 19,943 women with 4800 events, the HR for DFS was 0.81 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.86, P < 0.00001) favouring taxane containing regimens. There was no statistical heterogeneity for either OS or DFS.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis of studies supports the use of taxane containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimens with improvement of overall survival and disease-free survival for women with operable early breast cancer. The review did not identify a subgroup of patients where taxane containing treatment may have been more or less effective. Dosage and scheduling of the taxane drug is not clearly defined and we await results of the next generation of studies to determine the optimal use of taxanes in early breast cancer.

Evaluation of anemia, neutropenia and skin toxicities in standard or dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC)–paclitaxel or docetaxel adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Results of CALGB 9741 demonstrated that administering standard doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC)-paclitaxel therapy for adjuvant therapy of breast cancer in a dose-dense fashion with colony-stimulating factors increases efficacy, decreases severe neutropenia, but may increase the need for blood transfusions. A chart review was performed to evaluate the rates of anemia, neutropenia and skin toxicities with dose-dense and traditional AC-taxane chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 112 patients received one of four treatments: non-dose-dense AC-paclitaxel (NDD Pac), dose-dense AC-paclitaxel (DD Pac), non dose-dense AC-docetaxel (NDD Doc), or dose-dense AC-docetaxel (DD Doc).

RESULTS

Transfusion rates were not increased in the dose-dense population; however, rates of grade 2-4 anemia (23% versus 0%, P=0.029), as well as erythropoietin use (58% versus 0%, P <0.0001), were significantly increased in the DD Pac group compared with the NDD Pac group. Grade 3 skin toxicities were significantly increased in the DD Doc group compared with the NDD Doc group (70% versus 11%, P <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that dose-dense AC-taxane therapy may increase rates of anemia and the need for erythropoietin, and decrease rates of neutropenia. The utility of DD Doc appears limited by skin toxicities and its use outside of a clinical study should not be recommended.

Perspectives on cancer therapy-induced mucosal injury: pathogenesis, measurement, epidemiology, and consequences for patients

BACKGROUND

A frequent complication of anticancer treatment, oral and gastrointestinal (GI) mucositis, threatens the effectiveness of therapy because it leads to dose reductions, increases healthcare costs, and impairs patients' quality of life. The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and the International Society for Oral Oncology assembled an international multidisciplinary panel of experts to create clinical practice guidelines for the prevention, evaluation, and treatment of mucositis.

METHODS

The panelists examined medical literature published from January 1966 through May 2002, presented their findings at two separate conferences, and then created a writing committee that produced two articles: the current study and another that codifies the clinical implications of the panel's findings in practice guidelines.

RESULTS

New evidence supports the view that oral mucositis is a complex process involving all the tissues and cellular elements of the mucosa. Other findings suggest that some aspects of mucositis risk may be determined genetically. GI proapoptotic and antiapoptotic gene levels change along the GI tract, perhaps explaining differences in the frequency with which mucositis occurs at different sites. Studies of mucositis incidence in clinical trials by quality and using meta-analysis techniques produced estimates of incidence that are presented herein for what to our knowledge may be a broader range of cancers than ever presented before.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the pathobiology of mucositis, its incidence, and scoring are essential for progress in research and care directed at this common side-effect of anticancer therapies.

Emerging role of taxanes in adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: the potential and the questions

Adjuvant chemotherapy has gained increasing prominence in the treatment of nonmetastatic breast cancer, producing gradual improvement in the survival of these patients. The taxanes offer great hope for adding to the progress in adjuvant treatment, but data have been conflicting. Early results of multi-center trials testing the sequential addition of paclitaxel to anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy have perhaps been prematurely reported, but have already made a major impact on patterns of care for node-positive and even some node-negative patients. The early dramatic improvements in CALG 9344 are fading with time, however, and have not been confirmed by a second similar trial, NSABP B-28. Moreover, it cannot be stated with certainty whether the modest improvements observed by sequential addition of paclitaxel reflect the ability of this drug to kill anthracycline-resistant cancer cells or the increased total duration and amount of treatment. By contrast, the early results of the BCIRG 001 trial suggest that combining docetaxel with doxorubicin may significantly increase survival, but these early results should be viewed with caution and do not necessarily mean that docetaxel is superior to paclitaxel. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer has also expanded over the past 2 decades, from its initial use for inoperable locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) to its current use for patients with large operable tumors to make BCT feasible. The neoadjuvant approach also has an important role in clinical trials, where it will allow more rapid comparison of treatment regimens than can be accomplished in the adjuvant setting and provides an opportunity to analyze biologic markers as predictors of response. The value of this approach, however, will ultimately depend on a clear demonstration, not yet available, that a change in therapy that increases primary tumor response will also lead to improved long-term survival. The roles of docetaxel and paclitaxel in the neoadjuvant setting has been actively investigated over the past 5 to 10 years, and exciting results are beginning to emerge. Clearly, docetaxel has potent antitumor activity against breast cancer. Several preliminary results suggest that addition of docetaxel to an anthracycline-based regimen, particularly when added sequentially, as in NASBP B-27 and the Aberdeen trial, results in higher clinical and pathologic response rates. Whether this will translate into increased long-term survival, as suggested by the early results of the Aberdeen trial, remains to be seen. Whether sequential addition of docetaxel to doxorubicin is more or less effective than combining these drugs also has not been established. The results from M.D. Anderson suggesting that paclitaxel given on a weekly schedule was more effective than the same drug given every 3 weeks are particularly intriguing, and they may help to explain why the adjuvant studies with paclitaxel given every 3 weeks have not produced more dramatic results, whereas several studies with docetaxel (also given every 3 weeks) seem so positive. It may be that paclitaxel, with activity that is highly schedule-dependent and for which cell killing is more dependent on the duration of exposure, works best when given weekly, whereas the efficacy of docetaxel depends less on scheduling. If this is the case, then weekly paclitaxel may turn out to be equally effective as docetaxel appears to be even when given every 3 weeks. Alternatively, if docetaxel is simply a more active drug, then giving docetaxel weekly may be the most effective taxane regimen. Whether routine use of weekly chemotherapy administration in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting is practical or not is largely subjective, but at least it appears that the toxicity of this approach is acceptable. These issues are also being addressed in ongoing trials. Finally, taxanes have produced dramatic increases in response rates in the neoadjuvant setting, but, except for the Aberdeen trial, survival benefits have not yet been shown. If, however, the high pCR rates do translate into overall survival benefits that are greater than adding taxanes to postoperative adjuvant therapy, it might suggest that, unlike other drugs, taxanes are actually more effective before surgery than after, as predicted originally based on laboratory experiments. Clearly, much work remains to be done in this area of research on breast cancer therapy.

Neo-adjuvant therapy with dose-dense docetaxel plus short-term filgrastim rescue for locally advanced breast cancer

Neo-adjuvant, dose-dense docetaxel, 100 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks x 4 cycles, was administered to 12 patients with locally advance breast cancer (LABC) (10 stage IIIa and three stage IIIb). Eligibility requirements included a PS 0-2, normal hepatic and renal function, and radiologic absence of metastatic disease. Filgrastim [granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)] was started 1 day after chemotherapy and was given for 6 days. Complete blood counts were determined weekly. Surgery was planned upon recovery from the last dose of docetaxel and followed by 4 cycles of adjuvant doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC) and radiotherapy. Patients with ER status received tamoxifen. The median age was 45 (range 34-73) and pre-treatment pathology revealed poorly differentiated infiltrating duct carcinoma in 11 and infiltrating lobular cancer in one, with positive ER/PR status in five. Twelve patients were treated, and all are evaluable for response and toxicity. Nine patients had a major clinical tumor response with five PR and four pathologic complete responses (pCR rate of 33%). Three patients (of whom two with stage IIIb) had progressive disease and went on to receive neo-adjuvant therapy with AC. There was one instance of grade 3 hematologic toxicity (neutropenic fever in one G-CSF non-compliant patient). There were two instances of grade 3 extra-hematologic toxicity: one patient had severe pain and one had treatment-related fatigue. After a median follow-up of 20 months (range 7-49 months) all patients are alive and eight of nine responders remain progression-free. Despite the small size of our study, we believe that dose-dense neo-adjuvant docetaxel is well tolerated and its activity warrants confirmation in a larger number of patients.

Sequential or alternating administration of docetaxel (Taxotere) combined with FEC in metastatic breast cancer: a randomised phase II trial

The aim of this study, using a Fleming single-stage design, was to explore the efficacy and safety of Taxotere 100 x mg x m(-2) docetaxel and FEC 75 cyclophosphamide 500 mg x m(-2), fluorouracil 500 x mg x m(-2) and epirubicin 75 mg x m(-2), in alternating and sequential schedules for the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. One hundred and thirty-six women were randomly allocated, to one of three treatment regimens: DTX 100 plus FEC 75, alternated for eight courses (ALT); four courses of DTX 100 followed by four courses of FEC 75 (SEQ T); or four courses of FEC 75 followed by four courses of DTX 100 (SEQ F). One hundred and thirty-one women were evaluable for tumour response. Although the treatment outcome was equivalent in the two sequential arms and the alternating regimen (P=0.110, not significant), the response rate was less encouraging in the SEQ F arm (52.3%) than in the other two arms (71.1% for ALT and 70.5% for SEQ T), in which docetaxel was administered first. Time to progression was similar in the ALT, SEQ T and SEQ F arms (9.5, 9.3 and 10.4 months respectively). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in nearly all patients; febrile neutropenia occurred in 9% (ALT), 16% (SEQ T) and 2% (SEQ F) of patients. Few patients (< or =9%) developed grade 3-4 non-haematological toxicities. Relative dose intensity was 97-99% for all regimens. All treatment regimens were active and well tolerated.

Phase II study of sequential administration of docetaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a sequential administration of four cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks) followed by four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC; 60/600 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks), with subsequent consolidation with docetaxel or AC, as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients received 443 cycles of chemotherapy (median, 11 cycles/patient; range, 1 to 13 cycles). A total of 267 cycles of docetaxel (60.3%) and 176 of AC (39.7%) were given. Consolidation therapy was given to 33 patients (29 with docetaxel).

RESULTS

Grade 4 neutropenia was the most frequent toxicity (83% of patients). This was not cumulative and was rarely complicated by febrile neutropenia or severe infection. The nonhematologic safety profile was favorable: there were no grade 4 adverse events, and grade 3 episodes were infrequent. Docetaxel-specific toxicities were generally not severe. With a median cumulative doxorubicin dose of 397 mg/m(2) (range, 150 to 543 mg/m(2)), two incidences of unrelated congestive heart failure after further treatment with anthracyclines and two of asymptomatic left ventricular ejection fraction decrease were observed. Among the 42 assessable patients, five (12%) had complete and 25 (60%) had partial responses, for an overall response rate of 71% (95% confidence interval, 55% to 84%). Median duration of response was 53 weeks (range, 12 to 72 weeks), and median time to progression was 46 weeks (range, 3 of 72 weeks). With a median follow-up of 40.4 months, median survival was 32 months (range, 2 to 55 months).

CONCLUSION

This docetaxel-based sequential schedule is safe and effective in first-line therapy for MBC, without incurring cumulative toxicity, and provides a feasible chemotherapeutic option in this clinical setting.