Glucagon is an ACTH secretagogue as effective as hCRH after intramuscolar administration while it is ineffective when given intravenously in normal subjects

Glucagon does not directly stimulate pituitary secretion of ACTH, GH or copeptin

Glucagon is best known for its contribution to glucose regulation through activation of the glucagon receptor (GCGR), primarily located in the liver. However, glucagon's impact on other organs may also contribute to its potent effects in health and disease. Given that glucagon-based medicine is entering the arena of anti-obesity drugs, elucidating extrahepatic actions of glucagon are of increased importance. It has been reported that glucagon may stimulate secretion of arginine-vasopressin (AVP)/copeptin, growth hormone (GH) and adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) from the pituitary gland. Nevertheless, the mechanisms and whether GCGR is present in human pituitary are unknown. In this study we found that intravenous administration of 0.2 mg glucagon to 14 healthy subjects was not associated with increases in plasma concentrations of copeptin, GH, ACTH or cortisol over a 120-min period. GCGR immunoreactivity was present in the anterior pituitary but not in cells containing GH or ACTH. Collectively, glucagon may not directly stimulate secretion of GH, ACTH or AVP/copeptin in humans but may instead be involved in yet unidentified pituitary functions.

The acute effect of glucagon on components of energy balance and glucose homoeostasis in adults without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Using a systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to estimate the mean effect of acute glucagon administration on components of energy balance and glucose homoeostasis in adults without diabetes.

Methods

CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched from inception to May 2021. To be included, papers had to be a randomised, crossover, single- or double-blind study, measuring ad libitum meal energy intake, energy expenditure, subjective appetite, glucose, and/or insulin following acute administration of glucagon and an appropriate comparator in adults without diabetes. Risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized trials with additional considerations for cross-over trials. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed for outcomes with at least five studies. This study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021269623).

Results

In total, 13 papers (15 studies) were considered eligible: energy intake (5 studies, 77 participants); energy expenditure (5 studies, 59 participants); subjective appetite (3 studies, 39 participants); glucose (13 studies, 159 participants); insulin (12 studies, 147 participants). All studies had some concerns with regards to risk of bias. Mean intervention effect of acute glucagon administration on energy intake was small (standardised mean difference [SMD]: –0.19; 95% CI, –0.59 to 0.21; P = 0.345). Mean intervention effect of acute glucagon administration on energy expenditure (SMD: 0.72; 95% CI, 0.37–1.08; P < 0.001), glucose (SMD: 1.11; 95% CI, 0.60–1.62; P < 0.001), and insulin (SMD: 1.33; 95% CI, 0.88–1.77; P < 0.001) was moderate to large.

Conclusions

Acute glucagon administration produces substantial increases in energy expenditure, and in circulating insulin and glucose concentrations. However, the effect of acute glucagon administration on energy intake is unclear. Insufficient evidence was available to evaluate the acute effect of glucagon on subjective appetite.

The stimulatory effects of glucagon on cortisol and GH secretion occur independently from FGF-21

PURPOSE

Glucagon stimulation test (GST) is used to assess the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) and growth hormone (GH) axes with an incompletely defined mechanism. We aimed to assess if glucagon acted through fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF-21) to stimulate cortisol and GH secretion. The secondary outcome was to determine the relationship of FGF-21 with variable GH responses to GST in obesity.

METHODS

A total of 26 healthy participants; 11 obese (body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m²) and 15 leans (BMI < 25 kg/m²) were included. Basal pituitary and target hormone levels were measured and GST was performed. During GST, glucose, insulin, cortisol, GH, and FGF-21 responses were measured.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 26.3±3.6 years. Glucagon resulted in significant increases in FGF-21, glucose, insulin, cortisol, and GH levels. The levels of basal cortisol, GH, FGF-21, and IGF-1 were similar in the two groups. The peak GH and area under the curve (AUC)_(GH) responses to GST in the obese group were lower than those of the normal-weight group with a different pattern of response. There were no differences between the groups in terms of peak cortisol, AUC_(cortisol), peak insulin, AUC_(insulin), peak FGF-21, and AUC_(FGF21). Obesity was associated with significantly increased glucose and insulin responses and slightly decreased FGF-21 response to glucagon.

CONCLUSION

Obesity was associated with blunted and delayed GH, but preserved cortisol responses to GST. This is the first study showing that glucagon stimulates the HPA and GH axis independently from FGF-21. The delayed GH response to GST in obesity does not seem to be related to FGF-21.

Investigation of the Hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis: a contemporary synthesis

The hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is one of the main components of the stress system. Maintenance of normal physiological events, which include stress responses to internal or external stimuli in the body, depends on appropriate HPA axis function. In the case of severe cortisol deficiency, especially when there is a triggering factor, the patient may develop a life-threatening adrenal crisis which may result in death unless early diagnosis and adequate treatment are carried out. The maintenance of normal physiology and survival depend upon a sufficient level of cortisol in the circulation. Life-long glucocorticoid replacement therapy, in most cases meeting but not exceeding the need of the patient, is essential for normal life expectancy and maintenance of the quality of life. To enable this, the initial step should be the correct diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency (AI) which requires careful evaluation of the HPA axis, a highly dynamic endocrine system. The diagnosis of AI in patients with frank manifestations is not challenging. These patients do not need dynamic tests, and basal cortisol is usually enough to give a correct diagnosis. However, most cases of secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI) take place in a gray zone when clinical manifestations are mild. In this situation, more complicated methods that can simulate the response of the HPA axis to a major stress are required. Numerous studies in the assessment of HPA axis have been published in the world literature. In this review, the tests used in the diagnosis of secondary AI or in the investigation of suspected HPA axis insufficiency are discussed in detail, and in the light of this, various recommendations are made.

Role of Glucagon in Catabolism and Muscle Wasting of Critical Illness and Modulation by Nutrition

RATIONALE

Critical illness is hallmarked by muscle wasting and disturbances in glucose, lipid, and amino acid homeostasis. Circulating concentrations of glucagon, a catabolic hormone that affects these metabolic pathways, are elevated during critical illness. Insight in the nutritional regulation of glucagon and its metabolic role during critical illness is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether macronutrient infusion can suppress plasma glucagon during critical illness and study the role of illness-induced glucagon abundance in the disturbed glucose, lipid, and amino acid homeostasis and in muscle wasting during critical illness.

METHODS

In human and mouse studies, we infused macronutrients and manipulated glucagon availability up and down to investigate its acute and chronic metabolic role during critical illness.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In critically ill patients, infusing glucose with insulin did not lower glucagon, whereas parenteral nutrition containing amino acids increased glucagon. In critically ill mice, infusion of amino acids increased glucagon and up-regulated markers of hepatic amino acid catabolism without affecting muscle wasting. Immunoneutralizing glucagon in critically ill mice only transiently affected glucose and lipid metabolism, did not affect muscle wasting, but drastically suppressed markers of hepatic amino acid catabolism and reversed the illness-induced hypoaminoacidemia.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that elevated glucagon availability during critical illness increases hepatic amino acid catabolism, explaining the illness-induced hypoaminoacidemia, without affecting muscle wasting and without a sustained impact on blood glucose. Furthermore, amino acid infusion likely results in a further breakdown of amino acids in the liver, mediated by increased glucagon, without preventing muscle wasting. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00512122).

A possible primary cause of cancer: deficient cellular interactions in endocrine pancreas

Background

Cancer is a devastating type of disease. New and innovative ways to tackle cancers that have so far proved refractive to conventional therapies is urgently needed. It is becoming increasingly clear that, in addition to conventional therapeutics targeting by small molecules, that tumor cell metabolism presents new opportunities to target selectively specific cancer cell populations. Metabolic defects in cancer cells can be manifested in many ways that might not be readily apparent, such as altering epigenetic gene regulation for example.

The complex rewiring of metabolic pathways gives tumor cells a special advantage over differentiated cells, since they deplete body stores as fuel for their growth and proliferation. Tumor metabolism looks simpler when we consider that some enzymatic switches are in a neoglucogenic direction thereby depleting body stores. However, these pathways may be inadequately switched on by catabolic hormones (glucagon, epinephrine and cortisol) in a specific situation where anabolism is activated by, for example insulin released from beta pancreatic cells or IGF, inducing mitosis and synthesis that are powered by glucose catabolism. Such a hybrid metabolic situation would be reached if a pancreatic beta cell mechanism, mediated by GABA, failed to silence neighboring alpha cells and delta cells. The inhibitory transmitter GABA hyperpolarizes alpha and delta cells via their GABA A receptors, and blocks the release of glucagon and somatostatin. Alternatively, an anomaly of alpha cell channels, would lead to a similar situation. Whatever is the alteration, anabolism fails to silence catabolism and enzymatic switches controlled by kinases and phosphatases adopt an inadequate direction, leading to a hybrid metabolic rewiring found in cancer. It is daring to formulate such a hypothesis as this. However, it is quite possible that the starting point in cancer is an alteration of the endocrine pancreas, suppressing the mechanism by which beta cells silence the neighboring alpha and delta cells, with GABA and Zn²⁺.

Is there any relationship between imatinib mesylate medication and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction?

BACKGROUND

Imatinib mesylate [tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitor] is a novel medication in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukaemia (CML). TK is also essential in hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate HPA axis in patients treated with imatinib. Twenty-five patients were included in this study.

METHODS

Glucagon stimulation test (GST) and low-dose (1 microg) adrenocorticotropin test (LDSST) were used to assess the HPA gland axis.

RESULTS

Seventeen (68%) subjects had impaired peak response when a cortisol cut-off value is accepted as 500 nmol/L. Twelve (48%) out of 17 subjects also failed to show a response to LDSST. Therefore, 12 patients (48%) were defined as HPA deficient. Only two of these 25 patients had morning serum cortisol < 200 nmol/l (7.22 microg/dl), and failed the GST and/or LDSST, indicating that the majority had partial glucocorticoid deficiency. If the cut-off presume for LDSST is from 500 to 600 nmol/l, 16 patients (64%) would have failed both the GST and LDSST.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate an increased prevalence of subclinical glucocorticoid deficiency in patients receiving imatinib mesylate for CML. Therefore under stressed conditions, such as intercurrent illness state, overt and untreated partial glucocorticoid deficiency in CML patients become life threatening.

Glucagon inhibits ghrelin secretion in humans

OBJECTIVE

It is well known that i.m. glucagon administration stimulates GH and cortisol release in humans, although the mechanisms are unclear. These effects are similar to those described for ghrelin on somatotroph and corticotroph function. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of ghrelin in mediating the stimulatory effects of glucagon and to evaluate the effect of glucagon on ghrelin secretion.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We studied the endocrine and metabolic response to i.m. glucagon administration in 24 subjects (14 men, 10 women; age 19-65 years; body mass index, 25.3 +/- 1 kg/m(2)), who were shown to have an intact anterior pituitary function as evaluated before enclosure.

RESULTS

Serum ghrelin concentrations fell significantly at 30, 60, 120 and 180 min after glucagon administration (means +/- s.e.m.; baseline, 377.9 +/- 34.5 pg/ml; nadir, 294.6 +/- 28.3 pg/ml (60 min); P < 0.01). Conversely, i.m. glucagon elicited an increase in GH (baseline, 1.5 +/- 0.4 microg/l; peak, 14.2 +/- 2.7 microg/l (180 min); P < 0.01) and cortisol concentrations (baseline, 452.6 +/- 35.2 nmol/l; peak, 622.1 +/- 44 nmol/l (180 min); P < 0.01). The changes in ghrelin concentration at both 120 and 180 min were still significant after correction for glucose and insulin (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We show that i.m. glucagon decreases ghrelin significantly. Therefore, the already known stimulatory effects of i.m. glucagon on cortisol and GH are not mediated by a change in ghrelin concentrations. The mechanisms underlying the ghrelin suppression after i.m. glucagon are unlikely to include glucose or insulin variations and need to be further elucidated.

Ghrelin Is Suppressed by Glucagon and Does Not Mediate Glucagon-Related Growth Hormone Release

BACKGROUND

Glucagon stimulation is routinely used as a provocative test to assess growth hormone (GH) sufficiency in pediatrics. Ghrelin also markedly stimulates GH secretion. Because glucagon stimulates the promoter of the ghrelin gene in vitro as well as ghrelin secretion by the perfused rat stomach, we sought to determine whether ghrelin mediates glucagon-induced GH secretion.

METHODS

We compared ghrelin, GH, insulin and glucose responses following administration of 0.03 mg/kg intravenously (iv; max. 1 mg) and 0.1 mg/kg intramuscularly (im; max. 2 mg) of glucagon in two groups (n = 10-11/group) of GH-sufficient children. We also measured ghrelin before and 6 min after iv administration of 1 mg glucagon in 21 adult subjects.

RESULTS

In children, glucagon caused a 26% decrease in ghrelin and a 72% increase in glucose concentrations that were independent of the dose or administration route of glucagon. In contrast, the insulin response was 2-3 times higher following administration of 0.1 mg/kg im compared to 0.03 mg/kg of glucagon iv. There was a significant correlation between the maximum decrease in ghrelin and increases in glucose (p = 0.03) but not in insulin. There was a significant correlation between ghrelin and GH area under the curve after controlling for the dose of glucagon (p = 0.03) but not for the maximum increase in glucose.In normal adults, glucagon administration caused a 7% decrease in ghrelin concentrations after 6 min (p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSION

Ghrelin does not play a causal role in the GH response to pharmacological glucagon administration, which suppresses ghrelin levels starting a few minutes after injection.

Obese patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome show a peculiar alteration of the corticotroph but not of the thyrotroph and lactotroph function

OBJECTIVE

Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) is strongly associated with obesity (OB) and is characterized by several changes in endocrine functions, e.g. GH/IGF-I axis, adrenal and thyroid activity. It is still unclear whether these alterations simply reflect overweight or include peculiar hypoxia-induced hormonal alterations. Hormonal evaluations have been generally performed in basal conditions but we have recently reported that OSAS is characterized by a more severe reduction of the GH releasable pool in comparison to simple obesity. We aimed to extend our evaluation of anterior pituitary function to corticotroph, thyrotroph and lactotroph secretion under dynamic testing in OSAS in comparison with simply obese and normal subjects.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In 15 male patients with OSAS [age, mean +/- SEM 43.5 +/- 1.6 years; body mass index (BMI) 39.2 +/- 3.1 kg/m2; apnoea/hypopnoea index, (AHI) 53.4 +/- 8.7], 15 male patients with simple obesity (OB, age 39.7 +/- 1.2 years; BMI 41.2 +/- 2.0 kg/m2; AHI 3.1 +/- 1.2 events/h of sleep) and in 15 normal lean male subjects (NS, age 38.2 +/- 1.4 years; BMI 21.2 +/- 0.8 kg/m2; AHI 1.9 +/- 0.8 events/h of sleep) we evaluated: (a) the ACTH and cortisol responses to CRH [2 microg/kg intravenously (i.v.)] and basal 24 h UFC levels; (b) the TSH and PRL responses to TRH (5 microg/kg iv) as well as FT3 and FT4 levels.

RESULTS

Twenty-four-hour UFC levels in OSAS and OB were similar and within the normal range. Basal ACTH and cortisol levels were similar in all groups. However, the ACTH response to CRH in OSAS (Deltapeak: 30.3 +/- 3.8 pmol/l; DeltaAUC: 682.8 +/- 128.4 pmol*h/l) was markedly higher (P < 0.001) than in OB (Deltapeak: 9.3 +/- 1.4 pmol/l; DeltaAUC 471.5 +/- 97.3 pmol*h/l), which, in turn, was higher (P < 0.05) than in NS (Deltapeak: 3.3 +/- 0.9 pmol/l; DeltaAUC 94.7 +/- 76.7 pmol*h/l). On the other hand, the cortisol response to CRH was not significantly different in the three groups. Basal FT3 and FT4 levels as well as the TSH response to TRH were similar in all groups. Similarly, both basal PRL levels and the PRL response to TRH were similar in the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

With respect to patients with simple abdominal obesity, obese patients with OSAS show a more remarkable enhancement of the ACTH response to CRH but a preserved TSH and PRL responsiveness to TRH. These findings indicate the existence of a peculiarly exaggerated ACTH hyper-responsiveness to CRH that would reflect hypoxia- and/or sleep-induced alterations of the neural control of corticotroph function; this further alteration is coupled to the previously described, peculiar reduction of somatotroph function.

Glucagon administration elicits blunted GH but exaggerated ACTH response in obesity

Reduction in both spontaneous and stimulated GH secretion in obesity has been clearly demonstrated. Mild hyperactivity of hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis has been also reported. Glucagon, at least after im administration, induces clear increase in either GH or ACTH and F levels but its effect on somatotroph and corticotroph secretion in obesity has never been studied. In 7 patients with abdominal obesity (OB, aged 24-42 yr, BMI: 29.1-43.9 kg/m2, waist/hip ratio [WHR]: 0.86-1.00) we studied the GH, ACTH and F responses to the im administration of glucagon (0.017 mg/kg at 0 min). The results in OB were compared with those in a group of 6 age-matched controls normal subjects (Ns aged 26-32 yr, BMI 19.7-22.5 kg/m2). In Ns glucagon administration induced clear increase in GH (peak vs baseline, mean+/-SE: 11.6+/-3.4 vs 3.3+/-0.7 microg/l, p<0.02), and ACTH (52.9+/-15.2 vs 19.0+/-1.5 pg/ml, p<0.02) levels which peaked at +150 and +165 min, respectively. Increase in F levels (222.3+/-23.8 vs 158.3+/-7.0 ng/ml, p<0.05) was also recorded but peaked at +180 min. In OB glucagon administration induced GH response (7.4+/-2.3 vs 0.8+/-0.6 microg/l) lower (p<0.05) than that recorded in Ns; when the GH responses were evaluated by co-variance analysis, a significant difference between the 2 groups was recorded in term of peaks but not of AUCs. On the other hand, the ACTH response to glucagon in OB was higher than that in Ns (11452.6+/-2447.7 vs 4892.2+/-719.4 pg/ml x min, p<0.05). The F response to glucagon in OB and Ns was, however, similar (24057.9+/-4109.1 vs 29835.9+/-1566.0 ng/ml x min). In conclusion, this study demonstrates that in obese patients the im administration of glucagon elicits blunted GH response but exaggerated ACTH increase which is uncoupled with the adrenal response. These findings agree with the existence of concomitant GH insufficiency and altered corticotroph function in obesity.