Assessment of amifostine as protection from chemotherapy-induced toxicities after conventional-dose and high-dose chemotherapy in patients with germ cell tumor

Emerging and established therapies for chemotherapy-induced ototoxicity

PURPOSE

Ototoxicity is considered a dose-limiting side effect of some chemotherapies. Hearing loss, in particular, can have significant implications for the quality of life for cancer survivors. Here, we review therapeutic approaches to mitigating ototoxicity related to chemotherapy.

METHODS

Literature review.

CONCLUSIONS

Numerous otoprotection strategies are undergoing active investigation. However, numerous challenges exist to confer adequate protection while retaining the anti-cancer efficacy of the chemotherapy.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Ototoxicity can have significant implications for cancer survivors, notably those receiving cisplatin. Clinical translation of multiple otoprotection approaches will aid in limiting these consequences.

Loratadine for Paclitaxel-Induced Myalgias and Arthralgias

Background:

Seventy percentage of patients who receive paclitaxel have diffuse, refractory myalgias, and arthralgias. Based on anecdotal reports, this study explored whether loratadine, an antihistamine, palliates these symptoms.

Methods:

The medical records of postoperative ovarian and patients with endometrial cancer were studied, as these patients are routinely prescribed paclitaxel. Records were screened for patients who received paclitaxel and loratadine concurrently.

Results:

Forty patients are the focus of this report. Eight had paclitaxel-induced myalgias and arthralgias and then took loratadine; of these, 6 (75%; 95% confidence interval: 35%, 97%) manifested evidence of symptom improvement: “She did experience some migrating generalized body aches and pains…but this has resolved.” Of those already receiving loratadine but with no myalgias and arthralgias, only 11 of 32, or 34% (95% confidence interval: 19%, 53%), developed myalgias and arthralgias (in contrast to the previously reported symptom rate of 70%). No adverse events were clearly attributed to loratadine.

Conclusion:

These preliminary data support further study of loratadine for paclitaxel-induced myalgias and arthralgias.

Prevention of Cisplatin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury (CIA) is a serious adverse event that affects 20-40% of exposed patients, despite any implemented precaution to avoid it. The aim of this work was therefore to identify a relevant nephroprotective method for CIA.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science from 1 January 1978 to 1 June 2018, without language restriction. All studies (observational and interventional) assessing a CIA prevention method for adults receiving at least one course of cisplatin were eligible. The primary outcome was acute nephrotoxicity, as defined by the AKI-KDIGO classification (2012). The odds ratio and corresponding 95% confidence interval were used to assess the associations. We used narrative synthesis in case of heterogeneity regarding intervention, population, or outcome. When possible, a random-effects model was used to pool studies. The heterogeneity between studies was quantified (I²), and multiple meta-regressions were carried out to identify potential confounders.

RESULTS

Within 4520 eligible studies, 51 articles fulfilling the selection criteria were included in the review, assessing 21 different prevention methods. A meta-analysis could only be performed on the 15 observational studies concerning magnesium supplementation (1841 patients), and showed a significant nephroprotective effect for all combined grades of CIA (OR 0.24, [0.19-0.32], I² = 0.0%). This significant nephroprotective effect was also observed for grades 2 and 3 CIA (OR 0.22, [0.14-0.33], I² = 0.0% and OR 0.25, [0.08-0.76], I² = 0.0%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

While no method of prevention had so far demonstrated its indisputable efficacy, our results highlight the potential protective effect of magnesium supplementation on cisplatin-induced acute nephrotoxicity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is registered in PROSPERO, CRD42018090612.

Prevention of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in children and adolescents with cancer: a clinical practice guideline

Despite ototoxicity being a prevalent consequence of cisplatin chemotherapy, little guidance exists on interventions to prevent this permanent and progressive adverse event. To develop a clinical practice guideline for the prevention of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in children and adolescents with cancer, we convened an international, multidisciplinary panel of experts and patient advocates to update a systematic review of randomised trials for the prevention of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. The systematic review identified 27 eligible adult and paediatric trials that evaluated amifostine, sodium diethyldithiocarbamate or disulfiram, systemic sodium thiosulfate, intratympanic therapies, and cisplatin infusion duration. Regarding systemic sodium thiosulfate, the panel made a strong recommendation for administration in non-metastatic hepatoblastoma, a weak recommendation for administration in other non-metastatic cancers, and a weak recommendation against its routine use in metastatic cancers. Amifostine, sodium diethyldithiocarbamate, and intratympanic therapy should not be routinely used. Cisplatin infusion duration should not be altered as a means to reduce ototoxicity. Further research to determine the safety of sodium thiosulfate in patients with metastatic cancer is encouraged.

Interventions for cisplatin-induced hearing loss in children and adolescents with cancer

The identification of preventive interventions that are safe and effective for cisplatin-induced ototoxicity is important, especially in children because hearing loss can impair speech-language acquisition development. Previous randomised trials assessed systemic drugs such as amifostine, sodium diethyldithiocarbamate or disulfiram, and sodium thiosulfate. Amifostine, sodium diethyldithiocarbamate, and disulfiram did not show hearing preservation. Paediatric trials assessing sodium thiosulfate showed efficacy in terms of hearing protection. The SIOPEL 6 trial consisted solely of patients with localised hepatoblastoma and no effects on survival were shown. In the ACCL0431 trial, which included heterogeneous patients, a post-hoc analysis showed significantly worse overall survival among patients who had disseminated disease receiving sodium thiosulfate than among controls, but not among those with localised disease. Intratympanically administered drugs have mainly been assessed in adults and include N-acetylcysteine and dexamethasone. Inconsistent effects of these drugs were identified but these studies were limited by design, small sample size, and statistical approach. Future studies of systemic drugs will need to consider the measurement of disease outcomes through study design and sample size, and ototoxicity endpoints should be harmonised to enhance comparability between trials.

Protective Effect of Nanoceria on Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity by Amelioration of Oxidative Stress and Pro-inflammatory Mechanisms

Cisplatin (CP) is one of the most important anticancer compounds with its therapeutic usefulness in diverse types of solid cancer. However, its use is limited due to nephrotoxicity induced by it. Oxidative stress is an effective participant which contributes actively to pathogenesis of CP-induced nephrotoxicity. Nanoparticle form of a rare earth metal cerium, also known as nanoceria (NC), has come up as a potential antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent. In the present study, administration of CP in Swiss mice resulted in reduction of body weight, increased oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels including IL-6 and TNF-α along with alteration in normal histological architecture of kidney. On the contrary, NC (0.2 and 2 mg/kg i.p.) ameliorated nephrotoxicity of CP which was evident by reduction in levels of renal injury markers in plasma, i.e., creatinine and blood urea nitrogen. NC ameliorated oxidative stress by showing a reduction in levels of malondialdehyde and increased levels of endogenous antioxidants reduced glutathione and catalase. Further, NC treatment also reduced the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Furthermore, protective effect of NC was also corroborated by histopathological studies wherein, kidneys from CP group showed altered tissue structure after acute as well as chronic exposure of CP while the tissues from treated groups showed absence of alterations in kidney histology. The results from present study suggested that oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory cytokines play a central role in pathogenesis of CP-induced nephrotoxicity and NC provides protection from CP-induced nephrotoxicity due to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties.

Sustained-release microspheres of amifostine for improved radio-protection, patient compliance, and reduced side effects

A biweekly administration of sustained-release microsphere dosage form of amifostine, a radioprotective drug used in radiotherapy, was performed to examine the feasibility to minimize injection frequency and blood concentration-associated side effects. Model animal trials indicated that this subcutaneously injecting microspheres, 50-100 μm in diameter, achieved bi-weekly prolonged radio-protective efficacy and, at the same time, significantly reduced skin irritation than the solution form of amifostine given by the same administration route. In addition, the hypertension associated with blood concentration of amifostine was not observed in the drug-treated rats. The animals given the amifostine microspheres and amifostine showed significantly differences in white blood cell, red blood cell, hematocrit, hemoglobin and spleen tissue histopathology after exposed under a cobalt-60 γ-radiation at a dose rate of 1.0 Gy/min for 6 min. The in vitro release profile of amifostine from the micropsheres showed a minor initial burst (less than 20% of total drug loading in the first day of administration), consisting with the side effects observations. The results suggest that amifostine encapsulated in sustained-release microspheres may be an ideal dosage form for prolonged radio-protective efficacy and improved patient compliance.

The in vitro protective effect of salicylic acid against paclitaxel and cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity

Paclitaxel (PAC) and cisplatin (CIS) are two established chemotherapeutic drugs used in combination for the treatment of various solid tumors. However, the usage of PAC and CIS are limited because of the incidence of their moderate or severe neurotoxic side effects. In this study, we aimed to assess the protective role of salicylic acid (SA) against neurotoxicity caused by PAC and CIS. For this purpose, newborn Sprague Dawley rats were decapitated in sterile atmosphere and primary cortex neuron cultures were established. On the 10th day SA was added into culture plates. PAC and CIS were added on the 12th day. The cytotoxicity was determined by using the MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] assay. Oxidative alterations were assessed using total antioxidant capacity and total oxidative stress assays in rat primary neuron cell cultures. It was shown that both concentrations of PAC and CIS treatments caused neurotoxicity. Although SA decreased the neurotoxicity by CIS and PAC, it was more effective against the toxicity caused by CIS rather than the toxicity caused by PAC. In conclusion it was clearly revealed that SA decreased the neurotoxic effect of CIS and PAC in vitro.

Interventions for preventing neuropathy caused by cisplatin and related compounds

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin and several related antineoplastic drugs used to treat many types of solid tumours are neurotoxic, and most patients completing a full course of cisplatin chemotherapy develop a clinically detectable sensory neuropathy. Effective neuroprotective therapies have been sought.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the efficacy and safety of purported chemoprotective agents to prevent or limit the neurotoxicity of cisplatin and related drugs.

SEARCH METHODS

On 4 March 2013, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and CINAHL Plus for randomised trials designed to evaluate neuroprotective agents used to prevent or limit neurotoxicity of cisplatin and related drugs among human patients.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs in which the participants received chemotherapy with cisplatin or related compounds, with a potential chemoprotectant (acetylcysteine, amifostine, adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), BNP7787, calcium and magnesium (Ca/Mg), diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC), glutathione, Org 2766, oxcarbazepine, or vitamin E) compared to placebo, no treatment, or other treatments. We considered trials in which participants underwent evaluation zero to six months after completing chemotherapy using quantitative sensory testing (the primary outcome) or other measures including nerve conduction studies or neurological impairment rating using validated scales (secondary outcomes).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed each study, extracted the data and reached consensus, according to standard Cochrane methodology.

MAIN RESULTS

As of 2013, the review includes 29 studies describing nine possible chemoprotective agents, as well as description of two published meta-analyses. Among these trials, there were sufficient data in some instances to combine the results from different studies, most often using data from secondary non-quantitative measures. Nine of the studies were newly included at this update. Few of the included studies were at a high risk of bias overall, although often there was too little information to make an assessment. At least two review authors performed a formal review of an additional 44 articles but we did not include them in the final review for a variety of reasons.Of seven eligible amifostine trials (743 participants in total), one used quantitative sensory testing (vibration perception threshold) and demonstrated a favourable outcome in terms of amifostine neuroprotection, but the vibration perception threshold result was based on data from only 14 participants receiving amifostine who completed the post-treatment evaluation and should be regarded with caution. Furthermore the change measured was subclinical. None of the three eligible Ca/Mg trials (or four trials if a single retrospective study was included) described our primary outcome measures. The four Ca/Mg trials included a total of 886 participants. Of the seven eligible glutathione trials (387 participants), one used quantitative sensory testing but reported only qualitative analyses. Four eligible Org 2766 trials (311 participants) employed quantitative sensory testing but reported disparate results; meta-analyses of three of these trials using comparable measures showed no significant vibration perception threshold neuroprotection. The remaining trial reported only descriptive analyses. Similarly, none of the three eligible vitamin E trials (246 participants) reported quantitative sensory testing. The eligible single trials involving acetylcysteine (14 participants), diethyldithiocarbamate (195 participants), oxcarbazepine (32 participants), and retinoic acid (92 participants) did not perform quantitative sensory testing. In all, this review includes data from 2906 participants. However, only seven trials reported data for the primary outcome measure of this review, (quantitative sensory testing) and only nine trials reported our objective secondary measure, nerve conduction test results. Additionally, methodological heterogeneity precluded pooling of the results in most cases. Nonetheless, a larger number of trials reported the results of secondary (non-quantitative and subjective) measures such as the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) for neuropathy (15 trials), and these results we pooled and reported as meta-analysis. Amifostine showed a significantly reduced risk of developing neurotoxicity NCI-CTC (or equivalent) ≥ 2 compared to placebo (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.61). Glutathione was also efficacious with an RR of 0.29 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.85). In three vitamin E studies subjective measures not suitable for combination in meta analysis each favoured vitamin E. For other interventions the qualitative toxicity measures were either negative (N-acetyl cysteine, Ca/Mg, DDTC and retinoic acid) or not evaluated (oxcarbazepine and Org 2766).Adverse events were infrequent or not reported for most interventions. Amifostine was associated with transient hypotension in 8% to 62% of participants, retinoic acid with hypocalcaemia in 11%, and approximately 20% of participantss withdrew from treatment with DDTC because of toxicity.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

At present, the data are insufficient to conclude that any of the purported chemoprotective agents (acetylcysteine, amifostine, calcium and magnesium, diethyldithiocarbamate, glutathione, Org 2766, oxcarbazepine, retinoic acid, or vitamin E) prevent or limit the neurotoxicity of platin drugs among human patients, as determined using quantitative, objective measures of neuropathy. Amifostine, calcium and magnesium, glutathione, and vitamin E showed modest but promising (borderline statistically significant) results favouring their ability to reduce the neurotoxicity of cisplatin and related chemotherapies, as measured using secondary, non-quantitative and subjective measures such as the NCI-CTC neuropathy grading scale. Among these interventions, the efficacy of only vitamin E was evaluated using quantitative nerve conduction studies; the results were negative and did not support the positive findings based on the qualitative measures. In summary, the present studies are limited by the small number of participants receiving any particular agent, a lack of objective measures of neuropathy, and differing results among similar trials, which make it impossible to conclude that any of the neuroprotective agents tested prevent or limit the neurotoxicity of platinum drugs.

Interventions for preventing neuropathy caused by cisplatin and related compounds

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin and several related antineoplastic agents used to treat many types of solid tumors are neurotoxic, and most patients completing a full course of cisplatin chemotherapy develop a clinically detectable sensory neuropathy. Effective neuroprotective therapies have been sought.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the efficacy of purported chemoprotective agents to prevent or limit the neurotoxicity of cisplatin and related agents.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (25 August 2010), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 3, 2010 in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (January 1966 to August 2010), EMBASE (January 1980 to August 2010), LILACS (January 1982 to August 2010), CINAHL (January 1982 to August 2010) for randomized trials designed to evaluate neuroprotective agents used to prevent or limit neurotoxicity of cisplatin and related agents among human patients.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Quasi-randomized or randomized controlled trials whose participants received cisplatin (or related compounds) chemotherapy with or without a potential chemoprotectant (acetylcysteine, amifostine, ACTH, BNP7787, calcium and magnesium, diethyldithiocarbamate, glutathione, Org 2766, oxcarbazepine, or vitamin E) and were evaluated zero to six months after completing chemotherapy using quantitative sensory testing (primary) or other measures including nerve conduction studies or neurological impairment rating using validated scales (secondary).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We identified 16 randomized trials involving five possible chemoprotective agents in the initial 2006 review. Each study was reviewed by two authors who extracted the data and reached consensus. The 2010 update identified 11 additional randomized trials consisting of nine possible chemoprotective agents, including three treatments (acetylcysteine, calcium and magnesium, and oxcarbazepine) not among those described in the 2006 review. The included trials in the updated review involved eight unrelated treatments and included many disparate measures of neuropathy, resulting in insufficient data for any one measure to combine the results in most instances.

MAIN RESULTS

One of four eligible amifostine trials (541 total participants in all four trials) used quantitative sensory testing and demonstrated a favorable outcome in terms of amifostine neuroprotection, but the vibration perception threshold result was based on data from only 14 participants receiving amifostine who completed the post-treatment evaluation and should be regarded with caution. Of the six eligible glutathione trials (354 participants), one used quantitative sensory testing but reported only qualitative analyses. Four eligible Org 2766 trials (311 participants) employed quantitative sensory testing reported disparate results; meta-analyses of three trials using comparable measures showed no significant vibration perception threshold neuroprotection. The remaining trial reported only descriptive analyses. The single eligible trials involving acetylcysteine (14 participants), diethyldithiocarbamate (195 participants), calcium and magnesium (33 participants), and oxcarbazepine (32 participants) and the two eligible trials involving vitamin E (57 participants) did not perform quantitative sensory testing. In all, data from 1,537 participants were included.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

At present, the data are insufficient to conclude that any of the purported chemoprotective agents (acetylcysteine, amifostine, calcium and magnesium, diethyldithiocarbamate, glutathione, Org 2766, oxycarbazepine, or Vitamin E) prevent or limit the neurotoxicity of platin drugs among human patients.

In vivo mesna and amifostine do not prevent chloroacetaldehyde nephrotoxicity in vitro

Chloroacetaldehyde (CAA) is the putative metabolite responsible for ifosfamide-induced nephrotoxicity. Whereas evidence suggests that sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate (mesna) and amifostine protect renal cells against CAA toxicity in vitro, their efficacy in clinical studies is controversial. To better understand the discrepancy between in vivo and in vitro results, we combined the in vivo intraperitoneal administration of either saline or mesna (100 mg/kg) or amifostine (200 mg/kg) in rats and the in vitro study of CAA toxicity to both proximal tubules and precision-cut renal cortical slices. The measured renal cortical concentrations of mesna and amifostine were 0.6+/-0.1 micromol/g and 1.2+/-0.2 micromol/g, respectively; these drugs did not cause renal toxicity. Despite this, none of the adverse effects of 0.5 mM CAA was prevented by the previous in vivo administration of mesna or amifostine. Toxicity of 0.5 mM CAA to rat proximal tubules was shown by the fall of cellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP), total glutathione and coenzyme A + acetyl-coenzyme A levels and by the altered metabolic viability of renal cells. Long-term exposure of cortical slices to CAA concentrations > or =30 microM caused severe cell toxicity (i.e. decrease in cellular ATP, total glutathione, and coenzyme A + acetyl-coenzyme A levels), which was not prevented by the in vivo administration of mesna or amifostine.

Paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and nedaplatin (TIN) salvage chemotherapy for patients with advanced germ cell tumors

BACKGROUND

The paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin regimen has been used to treat metastatic testicular cancer with successful results. We investigated the usefulness of a paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and nedaplatin (TIN) regimen as salvage therapy for patients with advanced testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs).

METHODS

Eight patients with advanced GCTs were treated with TIN. The treatment was performed as salvage therapy for cases refractory to therapies, such as bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin, and irinotecan with nedaplatin. The TIN regimen consisted of paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) by 24-h infusion on day 1, followed by ifosfamide (1.2 g/m(2)) infusions over 2 h on days 2-6, and nedaplatin (100 mg/m(2)) given over 2 h on day 2.

RESULTS

Seven out of eight patients achieved a disease-free status after chemotherapy, followed by surgical resection of the residual tumor. Six of the seven patients have continued to show no evidence of disease after salvage therapy, with a median follow-up period of 27 months, but one patient developed a 'growing teratoma syndrome' in the mediastinum 31 months after TIN chemotherapy. All patients developed grade 4 leukocytopenia. However, it could be managed by using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Only one patient developed grade 2 sensory neuropathy and no patient developed nephrotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

The TIN regimen was efficacious and well-tolerated as salvage chemotherapy for Japanese patients with advanced GCTs.

Ifosfamide toxicity in cultured proximal renal tubule cells

Renal injury is a common side effect of the chemotherapeutic agent ifosfamide. Current evidence suggests that ifosfamide metabolites, particularly chloroacetaldehyde, produced within the kidney contribute to nephrotoxicity. The present study examined the effects of ifosfamide and its metabolites, chloroacetaldehyde and acrolein, on rabbit proximal renal tubule cells in primary culture, using a transwell culture system that allows separate access to apical and basolateral cell surfaces. The ability of the uroprotectant medications sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate (mesna) and amifostine to prevent chloroacetaldehyde-and acrolein-induced renal cell injury was also assessed. Ifosfamide (2,000-4,000 microM) did not affect transcellular inulin diffusion but caused a modest but significant impairment in organic ion transport; this impairment was greater when ifosfamide was added to the basolateral compartment of the transwell. Chloroacetaldehyde and acrolein (6.25-100 microM) produced dose-dependent impairments in transcellular inulin diffusion and organic ion transport. Chloroacetaldehyde was a more potent toxin than acrolein. Co-administration of mesna or amifostine prevented metabolite toxicity. Amifostine was only protective when added to the apical compartment of transwells. These results show that ifosfamide is taken up by renal tubule cells preferentially through their basolateral surfaces, and supports the hypothesis that chloroacetaldehyde is primarily responsible for ifosfamide-induced nephrotoxicity. The protective effect of mesna and amifostine in vitro contrasts with clinical experience showing that these medications do not eliminate ifosfamide nephrotoxicity in vivo.

Interventions for preventing neuropathy caused by cisplatin and related compounds

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin and several related antineoplastic agents used to treat many types of solid tumors are neurotoxic, and most patients completing a full course of cisplatin chemotherapy develop a clinically detectable sensory neuropathy. Effective neuroprotective therapies have been sought.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the efficacy of purported chemoprotective agents to prevent or limit the neurotoxicity of cisplatin and related agents among human patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Register (January 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1 2005), MEDLINE from (January 1966 to March 2005), EMBASE (from January 1980 to March 2005), LILACS (from January 1982 to March 2005), CINAHL (from January 1982 to March 2005) for randomized trials designed to evaluate neuroprotective agents used to prevent or limit neurotoxicity of cisplatin and related agents among human patients.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Quasi-randomized or randomized controlled trials whose participants received cisplatin (or related compounds) chemotherapy with or without a potential neuroprotectant (amifostine, diethyldithiocarbamate, glutathione, Org 2766, or vitamin E) and were evaluated zero to six months after completing chemotherapy using quantitative sensory testing (primary) or other measures including nerve conduction studies or neurological impairment rating using validated scales (secondary).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We identified 16 randomized trials involving five possible chemoprotective agents. Each study was reviewed by two authors who extracted the data and reached consensus. The included trials involved five unrelated treatments and included many disparate measures of neuropathy, resulting in insufficient data for any one measure to combine the results in most instances.

MAIN RESULTS

The one of five eligible amifostine trials (541 participants) using quantitative sensory testing demonstrated a favorable outcome in terms of amifostine neuroprotection, but the subclinical result was based on 14 participants receiving amifostine. Of the five eligible glutathione trials (327 participants), one used quantitative sensory testing but reported only qualitative analyses. Four eligible Org 2766 trials (311 participants) employed quantitative sensory testing reported disparate results; meta-analyses of three trials using comparable measures showed no significant vibration perception threshold neuroprotection. The remaining trial reported only descriptive analyses. The one eligible diethyldithiocarbamate trial (214 participants) and the one eligible vitamin E trial (27 participants) did not perform quantitative sensory testing.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

At present, the data are insufficient to conclude if any of the purported neuroprotective agents (amifostine, diethyldithiocarbamate, glutathione, Org 2766, or Vitamin E) prevent or limit the neurotoxicity of platin drugs among human patients.

Peripheral neuropathy induced by paclitaxel: recent insights and future perspectives

Paclitaxel is an antineoplastic agent derived from the bark of the western yew, Taxus brevifolia, with a broad spectrum of activity. Because paclitaxel promotes microtubule assembly, neurotoxicity is one of its side effects. Clinical use of paclitaxel has led to peripheral neuropathy and this has been demonstrated to be dependent upon the dose administered, the duration of the infusion, and the schedule of administration. Vehicles in the drug formulation, for example Cremophor in Taxol, have been investigated for their potential to induce peripheral neuropathy. A variety of neuroprotective agents have been tested in animal and clinical studies to prevent paclitaxel neurotoxicity. Recently, novel paclitaxel formulations have been developed to minimize toxicities. This review focuses on recent advances in the etiology of paclitaxel-mediated peripheral neurotoxicity, and discusses current and ongoing strategies for amelioration of this side effect.

Neuroprotection with amifostine in the first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer with carboplatin/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy--a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II study from the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologoie (AGO) Ovarian Cancer Study Group

GOALS OF WORK

Neurotoxicity is a common side effect of platinum/taxane-based therapy of ovarian cancer. We performed a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the influence of the cytoprotectant amifostine on the neurotoxicity of first-line therapy of ovarian cancer with paclitaxel/carboplatin with or without epirubicin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of 72 patients randomized, 71 were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC5 with or without epirubicin 60 mg/m2 (q21 x 6) and randomized for i.v. premedication with amifostine 740 mg/m2 or placebo. Assessment included a questionnaire, NCI-CTC, tendon reflex activity (TRA), two-point discrimination (2-PD), measurement of vibration perception threshold (VPT) and vibration disappearance threshold (VDT), and quality of life.

RESULTS

The majority of neurotoxicity criteria showed a significant impairment during therapy in both treatment arms. A significant protective effect of amifostine was observed for 2-PD, TRA, VPT and VDT. Amifostine failed to improve the 'global health status quality of life' score significantly. Toxicities according to NCI-CTC showed improved sensory neuropathy (P = 0.0046) but a worsening in terms of nausea (P = 0.0005) and vomiting (P = 0.0083). No significant differences were observed for single sensory and motor symptoms, except for a better skilfulness in the amifostine group (P = 0.0404).

CONCLUSION

Amifostine improved sensory neuropathy according to NCI-CTC and with regard to objective neurological assessment, but there were almost no differences in self-estimated specific sensory or motor symptoms. Disadvantages with regard to non-neurological toxicities and inconsistent results for quality of life demand further evaluation of neuroprotection with amifostine as well as alternative approaches to prevent platinum-taxane induced neurotoxicity.

Severe neurotoxicity, ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity following high-dose cisplatin and amifostine

Cisplatin in higher doses have been used routinely in the treatment of childhood tumours including neuroblastoma and germ cell tumors. Amifostine, a broad-spectrum cytoprotector of normal tissues, has been approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in patients receiving cisplatin. Such administration of amifostine has been reported to reduce cisplatin-related toxicities in some studies, but not all. The authors report a case of severe toxicity with cisplatin in a girl with epithelial cell carcinoma of the ovary despite the use of amifostine.

Neurophysiological study of peripheral neuropathy after high-dose Paclitaxel: lack of neuroprotective effect of amifostine

PURPOSE

To determine if there is a beneficial effect of amifostine in preventing or reducing the neuropathy induced by high-dose paclitaxel.

METHODS

Breast cancer patients receiving high-dose infusional paclitaxel (725 mg/m(2)/24 h) in combination with doxorubicin (165 mg/m(2)/96 h) and cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg/2 h; ACT) were studied on two autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant protocols, one with and one without amifostine (740 mg/m(2) administered over 10 min before and 12 h after initiation of the paclitaxel infusion). Patients were evaluated before ACT and 20-40 days later with neurological examination, a composite peripheral neuropathy score, peroneal and sural nerve conduction studies, and quantitative sensory testing.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in paclitaxel maximum concentration, systemic clearance, or area under the curve determinations. Narcotic requirement as well as recovery of hematopoietic counts were also similar in subjects with or without amifostine. After ACT was administered, there was a decrease in peroneal nerve compound muscle action potential amplitude and sural nerve sensory action potential amplitude, as well as an increase in vibratory and cold detection thresholds. Clinical composite peripheral neuropathy scores were similar despite amifostine treatment; and logarithm to the base 2 ratios post/pre ACT showed no significant effect of amifostine on peroneal nerve compound muscle action potential, sural nerve sensory action potential, vibratory detection thresholds, or cold detection thresholds. All subjects had acroparesthesias and lost their ankle deep-tendon reflexes after administration of ACT.

CONCLUSIONS

Single high-dose paclitaxel produces predictable clinical and neurophysiological changes so that patients receiving high-dose therapy are ideal subjects to test the effectiveness of neuroprotective agents. Amifostine was ineffective in preventing or reducing the neurotoxicity of high-dose paclitaxel.

WR-1065, the active form of amifostine, protects HL-60 cells but not peripheral blood mononuclear cells from radiation and etoposide-induced apoptosis

PURPOSE

Developing myeloid cells are particularly sensitive to chemotherapy and ionizing radiation. Mature cells of the hematopoietic lineages, such as are found in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), are much less sensitive for reasons that are not yet understood. Protecting the myeloid precursors from radiation or chemotherapy is an important goal.

METHODS

We have used fluorescence microscopy to assess the ability of WR-1065, the active metabolite of amifostine (Ethyol), to protect cultured myeloid leukemic HL-60 cells or freshly isolated PBMCs from the induction of apoptosis by ionizing radiation or etoposide.

RESULTS

WR-1065 greatly reduced the percentage of radiation-induced apoptosis in the p53 negative HL-60 cells 24 h after exposure to 8 Gy. WR-1065 also greatly reduced the percentage of HL-60 cells undergoing apoptosis 24 h after a 1-h exposure to 1 microM etoposide. The pan-caspase inhibitor ZVAD-fmk completely inhibited radiation-induced apoptosis in HL-60 cells when present for the first hour after exposure to radiation, but had no effect on cell survival. In contrast, neither WR-1065 nor ZVAD-fmk reduced the level of radiation-induced apoptosis in normal human PBMCs.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that pro-apoptotic pathways are present in immature myeloid cells that can be selectively protected from radiation or chemotherapy-induced apoptosis.

WR-2721 (Amifostine) ameliorates cisplatin-induced hearing loss but causes neurotoxicity in hamsters: dose-dependent effects

Chemoprotective agents reduce the toxic side effects of chemotherapy agents such as cisplatin. The conventional belief is that the chemoprotective agent WR-2721 (Amifostine), while protecting against most cisplatin-induced side effects, does not protect against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity (i.e., hearing loss). There is no knowledge, however, about the efficacy of high doses of WR-2721 (WR) in possibly protecting against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Thus, the dose-dependent effects of WR in possibly ameliorating cisplatin-induced ototoxicity were investigated. Hamsters were given a series of 5 cisplatin injections (3 mg/kg/injection once every other day, i.p.) either alone or in combination with 18, 40, 80, or 400 mg/kg/injection of the rescue agent WR ( n = 5 or 10/group). Other groups received either 80 mg/kg/injection WR alone ( n = 5) or were untreated ( n = 14). Ototoxicity was assessed by auditory brain stem responses (ABR). WR provided dose-dependent rescue from cisplatin's ototoxicity with no protection at the low dose of 18 mg/kg, moderate protection at 40 mg/kg, and nearly complete protection at 80 and 400 mg/kg. However, WR doses of 40 mg/kg or higher caused neurotoxicity as evidenced by prolongations in the ABR's interpeak latencies. Thus, high doses of WR provided the beneficial effect of protecting against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity, but had the harmful side effect of neurotoxicity. Previous failures to find chemoprotection from cisplatin-induced ototoxicity were likely due to the use of WR doses that were too small. The clinical implications of the beneficial and harmful effects of high doses of WR are discussed.

Amifostine: is there evidence of tumor protection?

A large body of experimental evidence suggests that amifostine (Ethyol, WR-2721; MedImmune, Inc, Gaithersburg, MD) is a selective cytoprotector of normal tissues. Nevertheless, several experimental studies, most of which were conducted in the early 1980s, suggest that amifostine may protect tumor tissues, although to a much lower degree than its protective effect on normal tissues. Based on a critical literature review, we conclude that any experimental evidence suggesting tumor protection is weak. The effects of anesthesia and hypotension on normal and tumor tissue oxygenation status of animals, the consequences of such events on amifostine activity, and the impact of this complex situation on host immunity and radiotherapy efficacy in the experimental setting do not reliably simulate the clinical setting. Analyses of radiobiologic and histologic results of the Canine Sarcoma Study show that, if any conclusion is to be made, amifostine protected normal tissues and preserved (or even enhanced) the antitumor activity of radiotherapy. The Ormaplatin Study clearly showed a 10-fold decreased concentration of platinum in tumor compared with normal tissues, and does not therefore support evidence of lack of amifostine selectivity. Finally, not one clinical study suggests tumor protection with amifostine. On the contrary, the majority of clinical data strongly suggest that patients who receive amifostine with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy do better than controls. Rather than organizing large-scale, randomized clinical trials to exclude tumor protection by amifostine, it seems more useful to design trials that would measure amifostine benefits in terms of improved quality of life, tumor control, and survival rates in patients being treated with standard or novel chemotherapy/radiotherapy regimens.

Treatment and care of neurotoxicity from taxane anticancer agents

Taxane anticancer agents play a central role in drug therapy for breast cancer today; however, they have a dose-limiting neurotoxicity that is difficult to prevent and treat. To protect against this neurotoxicity it is important to avoid large doses greater than 200 mg/m2, and to adopt 24-hour administration regimens. Care is also needed with regard to the cumulative dose. Glutamine and amitriptyline are two of the very few drugs that have been found to be clinically effective against drug-induced peripheral neuropathy. Drugs are discontinued if neuropathy appears. If administration is to be later restarted, it is recommended that combined use of glutamine or amitriptyline be considered and that patients be given guidance for daily life.

Neurotoxic complications of chemotherapy in patients with cancer: clinical signs and optimal management

Neurotoxic side effects of chemotherapy occur frequently and are often a reason to limit the dose of chemotherapy. Since bone marrow toxicity, as the major limiting factor in most chemotherapeutic regimens, can be overcome with growth factors or bone marrow transplantation, the use of higher doses of chemotherapy is possible, which increases the risk of neurotoxicity. Chemotherapy may cause both peripheral neurotoxicity, consisting mainly of a peripheral neuropathy, and central neurotoxicity, ranging from minor cognitive deficits to encephalopathy with dementia or even coma. In this article we describe the neurological adverse effects of the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents. The vinca-alkaloids, cisplatin and the taxanes are amongst the most important drugs inducing peripheral neurotoxicity. These drugs are widely used for various malignancies such as ovarian and breast cancer, and haematological cancers. Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy is clearly related to cumulative dose or dose-intensities. Patients who already have neuropathic symptoms due to diabetes mellitus, hereditary neuropathies or earlier treatment with neurotoxic chemotherapy are thought to be more vulnerable for the development of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Methotrexate, cytarabine (cytosine arabinoside) and ifosfamide are primarily known for their central neurotoxic side effects. Central neurotoxicity ranges from acute toxicity such as aseptic meningitis, to delayed toxicities comprising cognitive deficits, hemiparesis, aphasia and progressive dementia. Risk factors are high doses, frequent administration and radiotherapy preceding methotrexate chemotherapy, which appears to be more neurotoxic than methotrexate as single modality. Data on management and neuroprotective agents are discussed. Management mainly consists of cumulative dose-reduction or lower dose-intensities, especially in patients who are at higher risk to develop neurotoxic side effects. None of the neuroprotective agents described in this article can be recommended for standard use in daily practise at this moment, and further studies are needed to confirm some of the beneficial effects described.

Feasibility of amifostine administration in conjunction with high-dose rate brachytherapy

This ongoing study was initiated to determine the feasibility of administering amifostine (Ethyol, WR-2721; MedImmune, Inc, Gaithersburg, MD) with monomodal high-dose rate (mHDR) brachytherapy and to assess the tolerability and side effects of this combination. To date, 18 patients suitable for prostate implant brachytherapy (<or=T2aN0; prostate-specific antigen <or= 10 ng/mL; Gleason score <or= 6) have been treated with mHDR brachytherapy, receiving four 9-Gy fractions administered twice daily for 2 days. Amifostine (500 mg) is administered subcutaneously on the day before implant and 30 to 60 minutes before the first and third mHDR treatments. All 18 patients have received amifostine and brachytherapy as planned. Nausea was manageable with oral prochlorperazine in the pretreatment phase and our standard antiemesis protocol (intravenous promethazine, with granisetron if needed) during the implant; hypotension and asthenia were not problematic. During the 2-week post-treatment phase, grade 1 cystitis occurred in eight of 18 patients; grades 1 and 2 proctitis occurred in six of 18 and five of 18 patients, respectively. Six patients developed urinary obstruction symptoms. Preliminary results support the feasibility and tolerability of subcutaneous amifostine in conjunction with mHDR brachytherapy. Total accrual goal is 50 patients to assess long-term efficacy. Additional studies of HDR with amifostine are planned for patients with recurrent prostate and gynecologic cancer.

Comparative toxicity of ifosfamide metabolites and protective effect of mesna and amifostine in cultured renal tubule cells

Renal injury is a common side effect of the chemotherapeutic agent ifosfamide. Current evidence suggests that the ifosfamide metabolite chloroacetaldehyde contributes to this nephrotoxicity. The present study examined the effects of chloroacetaldehyde and acrolein, another ifosfamide metabolite, on rabbit proximal renal tubule cells in primary culture. The ability of the uroprotectant medications sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate (mesna) and amifostine to prevent chloroacetaldehyde- and acrolein-induced renal cell injury was also assessed. Chloroacetaldehyde and acrolein (25-200 M) produced dose-dependent declines in neutral red dye uptake, glucose transport and glutathione content. Chloroacetaldehyde was a more potent toxin than acrolein. Pretreatment of cells with the glutathione-depleting agent buthionine sulfoximine enhanced the toxicity of both chloroacetaldehyde and acrolein while co-administration of mesna or amifostine prevented metabolite toxicity. These results support the hypothesis that chloroacetaldehyde is responsible for ifosfamide-induced nephrotoxicity. The protective effect of mesna and amifostine in vitro contrasts with clinical experience showing that these medications do not eliminate ifosfamide nephrotoxicity.

Alpha-tocopherol protects against cisplatin-induced toxicity without interfering with antitumor efficacy

Our aim was 2-fold: to investigate the role of alpha-tocopherol supplementation on the antitumor activity of DDP and to evaluate the effect of alpha-tocopherol on the survival and neurotoxicity of DDP-treated mice. Experiments performed on the M14 human melanoma line demonstrated that alpha-tocopherol supplementation did not influence the efficacy of DDP; the inhibition of cell survival and of the in vivo tumor growth after treatment with alpha-tocopherol and DDP combination was similar to that observed after DDP alone. Conversely, alpha-tocopherol was also able to increase survival of mice treated with a high dose of DDP. While DDP alone produced death in about 70% of mice, the combination reduced deaths to about 30%. Analysis of oxidative stress markers and peroxidative damage in organs indicated that the protective effect of alpha-tocopherol was mainly related to its antioxidant activity. A significant increase in the concentration of TBARS and decreased PUFAs and catalase activity were observed after DDP treatment, while with alpha-tocopherol the levels of these markers were comparable to those observed in untreated mice. Histologic analysis performed on peripheral nerve revealed that alpha-tocopherol also protected mice from severe neurologic damage induced by DDP treatment. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that alpha-tocopherol protects against the systemic toxicity and neurotoxicity induced by DDP without interfering with its antitumor activity and suggest that this combination is a promising strategy to improve the therapeutic index of DDP-based chemotherapy.

Pelvic tumours in adolescence

Malignant pelvic tumours in adolescents are rare. Cancers most commonly associated with adolescent women are ovarian germ-cell tumours, ovarian stromal tumours, genital rhabdomyosarcomas and cervico-vaginal clear-cell adenocarcinomas. The incidence of the last of these has reduced with the abandonment of diethylstilbestrol (stilboestrol) therapy in pregnancy. With sexual activity among adolescent women increasing, the incidence of cervical cancer and gestational trophoblastic tumours is rising. Treatment for pelvic cancers in adolescence should be in a multidisciplinary setting and in most cases surgery should be conservative with the aim of preserving sexual and reproductive function. With a few notable exceptions, the prognosis for most malignant pelvic tumours that occur in adolescence is good and treatment is with curative intent.

Chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or relapsed germ-cell tumours

The optimal treatment in patients with poor prognosis germ-cell tumours (GCT), according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) classification, and in patients with refractory or relapsed disease after cisplatin-based chemotherapy is controversial. As the majority of patients will suffer systemic relapses, chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment. However, the question of whether or not to use conventional-dose or high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in these patients arises. Prognostic factors have recently been recognised to aid in this decision. However, reliable data on chemotherapy as primary treatment in poor prognosis patients and as the first-salvage attempt in patients with relapsed or refractory GCT are lacking. This report reviews the recent developments in first-line and salvage HDCT strategies and discusses the role of predictive factors for treatment outcome.