Biological considerations in locally advanced breast cancer treated with anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy: thymidine labelling index is an independent indicator of clinical outcome

Where Do We Look for Markers of Radiotherapy Fraction Size Sensitivity?

The response of human normal tissues to radiotherapy fraction size is often described in terms of cellular recovery, but the causal links between cellular and tissue responses to ionising radiation are not necessarily straightforward. This article reviews the evidence for a cellular basis to clinical fractionation sensitivity in normal tissues and discusses the significance of a long-established inverse association between fractionation sensitivity and proliferative indices. Molecular mechanisms of fractionation sensitivity involving DNA damage repair and cell cycle control are proposed that will probably require modification before being applicable to human cancer. The article concludes by discussing the kind of correlative research needed to test for and validate predictive biomarkers of tumour fractionation sensitivity.

Proliferation markers and survival in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 studies in 32,825 patients

We have performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of proliferation markers (Ki-67, mitotic index (MI), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and thymidine or bromodeoxyuridine labelling index (LI)) with respect to survival in early breast cancer. Eighty-five studies involving 32,825 patients were analysed. Ki-67 (43 studies, 15,790 patients), MI (20 studies, 7021 patients), and LI (11 studies, 7337 patients) were associated with significantly shorter overall and disease free survival, using results from univariate and multivariate analyses from the individual studies. PCNA (11 studies, 2677 patients) was associated with shorter overall survival by multivariate analysis only, because of lack of data. There was some evidence for publication bias, but all markers remained significant after allowing for this. Ki-67, MI, PCNA and LI are associated with worse survival outcomes in early breast cancer. However, whether these proliferation markers provide additional prognostic information to commonly used prognostic indices remains unclear.

Is the thymidine labeling index a good prognostic marker in breast cancer?

Background

The aim of the present study was to determine the prognostic relevance of thymidine labeling index (TLI) in patients with breast cancer.

Methods

TLI of the primary tumor was measured in 268 patients at the time of the surgical biopsy by an in vitro method.

Results

Fifty-four patients had stage I disease, and 138 patients had stage II disease, and 76 patients had stage III disease. One hundred-four patients were found to have low TLI-index (<3%), and 164 patients had high TLI-index (≥3%). The median follow-up was 71.5 months (range, 6–138 months). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) rates was 84% and 74%, respectively. Lymph node involvement, tumor size more than 2 cm, high nuclear grade and estrogen receptor negativity were found to be associated with poorer DFS and OS rates. On subgroup analysis, however, the 5-year OS rate was significantly higher in the low TLI-group than in the high TLI-group in patients with stage I disease (100% vs 76%, p = 0.05).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that the prognostic significance of TLI appears to be limited to early breast cancer that might help to distinguish patients who need more aggressive adjuvant treatment.

Clinical and pathological predictors of the response to neoadjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to determine clinical and histopathological characteristics correlated to responsiveness to anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied primary tumor specimens with local advanced breast cancer from 40 patients. Patients received anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant regimen consisted in 600 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil, 60 mg/m2 doxorubicin, and 600 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide (FAC). The World Health Organization criteria were used to classify the tumors. We performed immunohistochemical staining for ER, PgR, HER-2, PCNA (proliferation cell nuclear antigen), Ki-67, p53, and Bcl-2. Clinical and histopathological characteristics were associated with clinical response and histopathological changes induced by chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The mean age was 47 +/- 14 yr. Twenty-three percent of patients were in stage IIB and 77% were in stages IIIA and IIIB. Seven percent of patients had progression of the disease. Stable disease was observed in 42% of patients and 45% had partial response. Only 7% of patients had a complete response. Factors associated with a better and major percentage of clinical response were the administration of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy, administration of more than three cycles, clinical N1, atypia, more than 10 mitosis per high-power field, moderate to severe SBR grade, and a major index of cellular proliferation.

CONCLUSION

We found that tumors with large volumes, N2 node status, low cellular proliferation rate, positive immunoreactivity to p53, and low differentiation grade have a lower response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with anthracycline. These patients could benefit from a different chemotherapy scheme to obtain a better control and resection.

Evaluation of ER, PgR, HER-2 and Ki-67 as predictors of response to neoadjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy for operable breast cancer

Primary systemic therapy (PST) for operable breast cancer enables the identification of in vivo biological markers that predict response to treatment. A total of 118 patients with T2–4 N0–1 M0 primary breast cancer received six cycles of anthracycline-based PST. Clinical and radiological response was assessed before and after treatment using UICC criteria. A grading system to score pathological response was devised. Diagnostic biopsies and postchemotherapy surgical specimens were stained for oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptor, HER-2 and cell proliferation (Ki-67). Clinical, radiological and pathological response rates were 78, 72 and 38%, respectively. There was a strong correlation between ER and PgR staining (P<0.0001). Higher Ki-67 proliferation indices were associated with PgR− tumours (median 28.3%, PgR+ 22.9%; P=0.042). There was no relationship between HER-2 and other biological markers. No single pretreatment or postchemotherapy biological parameter predicted response by any modality of assessment. In all, 10 tumours changed hormone receptor classification after chemotherapy (three ER, seven PgR); HER-2 staining changed in nine cases. Median Ki-67 index was 24.9% before and 18.1% after treatment (P=0.02); the median reduction in Ki-67 index after treatment was 21.2%. Tumours displaying >75% reduction in Ki-67 after chemotherapy were more likely to achieve a pathological response (77.8 vs 26.7%, P=0.004).

Thymidine labeling index: prognostic role in breast cancer

The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic role of thymidine labeling index in patients with breast cancer. Cellular proliferation rates in 155 breast cancer specimens were investigated by 3H-thymidine labeling index (3H-TLI). Median age was 47 years (range: 23-76). At presentation, 11 patients (7.1%) had stage I disease, 76 (49%) had stage II, 64 (41.3%) had stage III disease, and 4 (2.6%) had metastatic involvement. Patients were placed in 2 groups based on their proliferative indices. The cut-off level was assigned as the median TLI value of the whole group. Correlations between proliferative activity of the tumors based on 3H-TLI levels and various previously established prognostic factors, as well as the influence of proliferative activity on survival as a clinical outcome, were analyzed. The mean and median TLI values for the whole group of patients were 4.36 +/- 4.96% and 2.76% (range: 0-23.6), respectively. There was a significant association of nuclear grade with TLI (P = 0.04). Patients who were alive with no sign of disease at the final follow-up examination had a significantly lower median TLI rate than those who were either alive with disease or those who had eventually died with disease progression (3.7% versus 1.9%, respectively; P = 0.04). Patients with locally advanced disease (N2 + N3 involvement) had a significantly higher median TLI rate than those with local nodal involvement (N1) (3.4% versus 1.7%, respectively, P = 0.026). Furthermore, TLI levels showed a significant association with overall survival in patients with node-negative disease (P = 0.02). Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that TLI plays a significant prognostic role in a subset of patients with node-negative breast cancer. Furthermore, TLI appears to have a predictive value for the clinical outcome of patients with breast cancer. These findings may justify a more aggressive therapeutic approach in patients with high TLI levels. Further large-scale, prospective studies are required before a definite conclusion can be reached.reached.

Update on locally advanced breast cancer

Locally advanced breast cancer remains a clinical challenge as the majority of patients with this diagnosis develop distant metastases despite appropriate therapy. Patients with locally advanced disease encompass a wide range of clinical scenarios including advanced primary tumors (stage T4), advanced nodal disease (fixed axillary nodes or involvement of ipsilateral supraclavicular, infraclavicular, or internal mammary nodes), and inflammatory carcinomas. The prognoses of women with locally advanced breast tumors are also heterogeneous and depend on tumor size, extent of lymph node involvement, and the presence or absence of inflammatory carcinoma. Women with locally advanced disease require multimodal therapy, and coordinated treatment planning among the medical oncologist, surgical oncologist, and radiation oncologist is necessary to optimize patient care. In this article, the epidemiology, evaluation, prognostic factors, and treatment for locally advanced breast cancer are discussed. Inflammatory cancer is also reviewed, but is considered separately due to its distinct biology and clinical behavior.

A Pilot Study of Dose Intense Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Infusional Paclitaxel in High-Risk Primary Breast Cancer

We conducted a pilot study of dose dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) combination chemotherapy followed by infusional paclitaxel (T) in primary breast cancer to determine its safety and feasibility. Twenty-two subjects (10 with stage II and > or = 4 positive lymph nodes, and 12 with stage III disease) were treated with AC (A 60 mg/m2 and C 2000 mg/m2) with filgrastim every 14 days for three cycles followed by infusional paclitaxel (140 mg/m2 over 96 h) every 14 days for three cycles. Mean overall cycle length was 15.3 days and mean duration of therapy was 92 days. Dose reductions of C or T were required in 7/132 (5.3%) cycles for mucositis, diarrhea, or failure to recover platelets by day 15. Ninety-five percent of subjects had grade 4 neutropenia and 1 subject had a platelet nadir of < 20,000. Actual delivered dose intensity (DI) over six cycles was: A 27 mg/m2 per week; C 892 mg/m2 per week; T 64 mg/m2 per week (90.6, 89.2, and 91.4% of planned DI, respectively). Average total dose administered was: A 180 mg/m2; C 5880 mg/m2; T 403 mg/m2 (100, 98, and 96% of planned total doses, respectively). Clinical response rate in 10 subjects receiving neoadjuvant therapy was 100% (4 complete response, 6 partial response). Four subjects had a pathologic complete response (three subjects without evidence of malignancy and one subject with ductal carcinoma in situ.) Administration of dose dense AC followed by infusional paclitaxel in 14-day cycles is feasible and this regimen is active in breast cancer.

Inflammatory breast cancer: results of antracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Twenty-three patients with inflammatory breast cancer treated with a combined modality approach including anthracycline-based induction chemotherapy-surgery-chemotherapy-radiotherapy were reviewed. Twelve patients (52.2%) received FAC (5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide) and 11 patients (47.8%) were treated with FEC (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide) induction chemotherapy for three cycles every 3 weeks. Surgery was followed by the initial chemotherapy or second-line chemotherapy for an additional six cycles to complete nine cycles and radiotherapy, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) time was 27 months and the median disease-free survival (DFS) was 13 months. Furthermore, patients treated with FAC induction chemotherapy have been found to have longer median OS and DFS periods compared to patients with FEC induction chemotherapy in both univariate and multivariate analysis. In conclusion, the superiority of doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy over epirubicin-containing chemotherapy should be established in larger randomized studies and more effective chemotherapeutic agents such as taxans are required for better survival rates in inflammatory breast cancer patients.