Population pharmacokinetic and dynamic analysis of the topoisomerase I inhibitor lurtotecan in phase II studies

Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of drug-induced adverse effects of a novel homocamptothecin analog, elomotecan (BN80927), in a Phase I dose finding study in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

To characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of elomotecan, a novel homocamptothecin analog, evaluate the dose-limiting toxicities, and establish the relationship between exposure and toxicity in the first Phase I study in patients with advanced malignant solid tumors. Preliminary antitumor efficacy results are also provided.

DESIGN

Elomotecan was administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion at doses ranging from 1.5 to 75 mg once every 3 weeks to 56 patients with advanced solid tumors. Plasma concentration data and adverse effects were modeled using the population approach.

RESULTS

Elomotecan showed linear pharmacokinetics, and clearance was decreased with age. The model predicts a 47 and 61 % reduction in CL for patients aged 60 and 80 years, respectively, when compared with younger patients (30 years). Neutropenia represented the dose-limiting toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose and the recommended dose (RD) were 75 and 60 mg, respectively. Elomotecan elicited a 20, 5, 2, and 2 % severe (grade 4) neutropenia, asthenia, nausea, and vomiting at the RD, respectively. Of the subjects in the RD cohort, 41.7 % had a stable disease mean duration of 123.6 ± 43.4 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetic parameters and the toxicity pattern of elomotecan suggest that this novel homocamptothecin analog should be further explored in the clinical setting using a dose of 60 mg administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion, once every 3 weeks.

Cancer therapies utilizing the camptothecins: a review of the in vivo literature

This review summarizes the in vivo assessment-preliminary, preclinical, and clinical-of chemotherapeutics derived from camptothecin or a derivative. Camptothecin is a naturally occurring, pentacyclic quinoline alkaloid that possesses high cytotoxic activity in a variety of cell lines. Major limitations of the drug, including poor solubility and hydrolysis under physiological conditions, prevent full clinical utilization. Camptothecin remains at equilibrium in an active lactone form and inactive hydrolyzed carboxylate form. The active lactone binds to DNA topoisomerase I cleavage complex, believed to be the single site of activity. Binding inhibits DNA religation, resulting in apoptosis. A series of small molecule camptothecin derivatives have been developed that increase solubility, lactone stability and bioavailability to varying levels of success. A number of macromolecular agents have also been described wherein camptothecin(s) are covalently appended or noncovalently associated with the goal of improving solubility and lactone stability, while taking advantage of the tumor physiology to deliver larger doses of drug to the tumor with lower systemic toxicity. With the increasing interest in drug delivery and polymer therapeutics, additional constructs are anticipated. The goal of this review is to summarize the relevant literature for others interested in the field of camptothecin-based therapeutics, specifically in the context of biodistribution, dosing regimens, and pharmacokinetics with the desire of providing a useful source of comparative data. To this end, only constructs where in vivo data is available are reported. The review includes published reports in English through mid-2009.

Control-relevant modeling of the antitumor effects of 9-nitrocamptothecin in SCID mice bearing HT29 human colon xenografts

The mathematical model structure selected to describe system behavior is at least partially dependent on the proposed use of the model. In this paper, a pharmacokinetic(PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) model for use in drug delivery algorithm synthesis is developed. The antitumor agent 9-nitrocamptothecin (9NC) was administered orally to severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice bearing subcutaneously implanted HT29 human colon xenografts, and the effect of 9NC on those xenografts was characterized. Different PK model structures were considered in characterizing the dynamics of the drug concentration in the plasma. Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) was used to select the model structure maximizing fit accuracy while simultaneously minimizing the number of model parameters. The resulting PK model was a set of coupled linear ordinary differential equations able to describe the nonlinear dynamic behavior (e.g. plateauing, etc.) of the drug concentrations observed in the plasma. Pharmacodynamics were modeled by characterizing tumor growth in both the untreated and drug-treated animals. The resulting PK/PD model related drug administration to effect, and this model has a structure that facilitates future control algorithm synthesis. Control algorithms in this context would directly utilize PK/PD model predictions. These predictions would be used to determine the amount and frequency of drug administration in order to reduce the tumor burden without violating clinically relevant constraints. This methodology could then be used to aid the clinician in selecting dose levels and schedules, and extension to patient tailored treatment may eventually be feasible with this approach.

Phase I dose-finding study and a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of the neutropenic response of intravenous diflomotecan in patients with advanced malignant tumours

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intravenous (iv) diflomotecan administered once every 3 weeks, and to characterize the relationship between pharmacokinetics and neutropenic effect, using a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Twenty-four patients received a total of 75 cycles of iv diflomotecan that was administered as 20-min infusion, once every 3 weeks at escalating doses of 2, 4, 5, and 6 mg/m2. Haematological and non-haematological toxicities were evaluated. Plasma concentrations of diflomotecan were measured after the first drug administration.

RESULTS

Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) following the first cycle occurred in 12 patients and a total of 16 patients experienced DLT at some point in the trial. During the first cycle of treatment the number of patients in the 5 and 6 mg/m2 dose groups that experienced DLT was 3 of 4, and 3 of 3, respectively. Therefore, the dose of 5 mg/m2 was considered the MTD and the dose of 4 mg/m2 the recommended dose (RD). During the first cycle, 12 patients experienced DLT, six had either infection of haematological toxicity and eight complained of fatigue. The best response was a partial response in one patient treated at the 6 mg/m2 dose level. Disease stabilization was observed in seven patients (four patients treated at 4 mg/m2 and one patient at each dose level of 2, 5, and 6 mg/m2). The remaining patients had all progressive disease. The median time to progression for all patients was 5.9 weeks. Pharmacokinetics of diflomotecan was described with a three-compartmental model. Mean population parameter estimates of the apparent volume of distribution of the central compartment (V c) increased linearly with body surface area (BSA) as: V c (L) = 41.5 x (BSA/1.85), and the mean population estimate of the apparent volume of distribution of the shallow compartment was lower in females (29.5 vs 48.8 L). Computer simulations showed the lack of clinical significance of these covariates. The time course of the neutropenic response was adequately described by a semi-mechanistic model that includes cellular processes and drug effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD and RD after a 20-min iv infusion of diflomotecan every 3 weeks are 4 and 5 mg/m2, respectively. Diflomotecan showed linear pharmacokinetic behaviour and the selected PK/PD model described adequately the time course of neutropenia. The mean model predicted values of nadir and time to nadir after a 20-min iv infusion of 4 mg/m2 of diflomotecan was 0.86 x 10(9) /L neutrophil cell counts and 11 days, respectively.

Randomized Trial of Two Intravenous Schedules of the Topoisomerase I Inhibitor Liposomal Lurtotecan in Women With Relapsed Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

Purpose

Liposomal lurtotecan (OSI-211) is a liposomal formulation of the water-soluble topoisomerase I inhibitor lurtotecan (GI147211), which demonstrated superior levels of activity compared with topotecan in preclinical models. We studied two schedules of OSI-211 in a randomized design in relapsed ovarian cancer to identify the more promising of the two schedules for further study.

Patients and Methods

Eligible patients had measurable epithelial ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal cancer that was recurrent after one or two prior regimens of chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either arm A (OSI-211 1.8 mg/m2/d administered by 30-minute intravenous infusion on days 1, 2, and 3 every 3 weeks) or arm B (OSI-211 2.4 mg/m2/d administered by 30-minute intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks). The primary outcome measure was objective response, which was confirmed by independent radiologic review, and a pick the winner statistical design was used to identify the schedule most likely to be superior.

Results

Eighty-one patients were randomized between October 2000 and September 2001. The hematologic toxic effects were greater on arm A than on arm B (grade 4 neutropenia, 51% v 22%, respectively), as was febrile neutropenia (26% v 2.4%, respectively). Of the 80 eligible patients, eight patients (10%) had objective responses; six responders (15.4%; 95% CI, 6% to 30%) were in arm A and two responders (4.9%; 95% CI, 1% to 17%) were in arm B.

Conclusion

The OSI-211 daily for 3 days intravenous schedule met the statistical criteria to be declared the winner in terms of objective response. This schedule was also associated with more myelosuppression than the schedule of OSI-211 administered in arm B.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of a low-clearance, unilamellar liposomal formulation of lurtotecan, a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced leukemia

BACKGROUND

OSI-211 is a low-clearance, unilamellar liposomal formulation of a water-soluble camptothecin analogue, lurtotecan. OSI-211 has significant activity in severe combined immunodeficient mouse models of human leukemia.

METHODS

This study was conducted to define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and pharmacokinetics of OSI-211 in patients with refractory myeloid leukemias. Patients with refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or chronic myelogenous leukemia in blastic phase (CML-BP) were eligible. OSI-211 was given as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes daily for 3 days. The starting dose was 1.5 mg/m2 per day (4.5 mg/m2 per course). The dose was escalated by 50% until Grade 2 toxicity was observed and then by 30-35% until the DLT was defined. Serial plasma and urine samples were collected, and drug levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (18 patients [90%] with AML, and 1 patient each [5%] with MDS and CML-BP) were treated. Mucositis and diarrhea were considered to be the DLTs. The maximum tolerated dose was 3.7 mg/m2 per day. Fourteen of 18 evaluable patients (78%) with AML or MDS achieved transient bone marrow aplasia. The mean systemic clearance of lurtotecan in plasma was 0.946 +/- 1.53 L/hour/m2. Urinary recovery of lurtotecan was 6.66% +/- 5.26% (range, 1.05-18.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Liposomal encapsulation of lurtotecan altered its metabolism significantly. There was no evident correlation between exposure, as measured by plasma pharmacokinetics of lurtotecan, and clinical response or toxicities. OSI-211 merits further study in hematologic malignancies.

Role of body surface area in dosing of investigational anticancer agents in adults, 1991-2001

The prescribed dose of anticancer agents is most commonly calculated using body surface area as the only independent variable, and it has been shown that this approach still results in large interpatient variability in drug exposure. Here, we retrospectively assessed the pharmacokinetics of 33 investigational agents tested in phase I trials from 1991 through 2001, as a function of body surface area in 1650 adult cancer patients. Twelve of the drugs were administered orally, 19 were administered intravenously, and two were administered by both routes. Body surface area-based dosing was statistically significantly associated with a reduction in interpatient variability in drug clearance for only five of the 33 agents: docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil/eniluracil, paclitaxel, temozolomide, and troxacitabine. These results do not support the use of body surface area in dose calculations and suggest that alternate dosing strategies should be evaluated. We conclude that body surface area should not be used to determine starting doses of investigational agents in future phase I studies.