Extent and variability of the first-pass elimination of adinazolam mesylate in healthy male volunteers

Combination of Near Infrared Light-Activated Photodynamic Therapy Mediated by Indocyanine Green with Etoposide to Treat Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Indocyanine green (ICG) has been reported as a potential near-infrared (NIR) photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy (PDT) of cancer. However the application of ICG-mediated PDT is both intrinsically and physiologically limited. Here we report a combination of ICG-PDT with a chemotherapy drug etoposide (VP-16), aiming to enhance the anticancer efficacy, to circumvent limitations of PDT using ICG, and to reduce side effects of VP-16. We found in controlled in vitro cell-based assays that this combination is effective in killing non-small-cell lung cancer cells (NSCLC, A549 cell line). We also found that the combination of ICG-PDT and VP-16 exhibits strong synergy in killing non-small-cell lung cancer cells partially through inducing more DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), while it has a much weaker synergy in killing human normal cells (GM05757). Furthermore, by studying the treatment sequence dependence and the cytotoxicity of laser-irradiated mixtures of ICG and VP-16, we found that the observed synergy involves direct/indirect reactions between ICG and VP-16. We further propose that there exists an electron transfer reaction between ICG and VP-16 under irradiation. This study therefore shows the anticancer efficacy of ICG-PDT combined with VP-16. These findings suggest that ICG-mediated PDT may be applied in combination with the chemotherapy drug VP-16 to treat some cancers, especially the non-small-cell lung cancer.

Prediction of modified release pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics from in vitro, immediate release, and intravenous data

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the value of mechanistic simulations in gaining insight into the behaviors of modified release (MR) formulations in vivo and to use the properly calibrated models for prediction of pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). GastroPlus (Simulations Plus, Inc.) was used to fit mechanistic models for adinazolam and metoprolol that describe the absorption, PK, and PD after intravenous (i.v.) and immediate release (IR) oral (p.o.) administration. The fitted model for adinazolam was then used to predict the PD profile for a MR formulation and to design a new formulation with desired onset and duration of action. The fitted metoprolol model was used to gain insight and to explain the in vivo behaviors of MR formulations. For each drug, a single absorption/PK model was fitted that provided simulated plasma concentration-time profiles closely matching observed in vivo profiles across several different i.v. and p.o doses. Sedation score profiles of adinazolam were fitted with an indirect PD model. For metoprolol, the fitted absorption/PK model for IR p.o. doses was used to select in vitro dissolution conditions that best matched the in vivo release of MR doses. This model also explained differences in exposure after administration of MR formulations with different release rates. Mechanistic absorption/PK models allow for detailed descriptions of all processes affecting the two drugs' bioavailability, including release/dissolution, absorption, and intestinal and hepatic first pass extraction. The insights gained can be used to design formulations that more effectively overcome identified problems.

Kinetics and dynamics of intravenous adinazolam, N-desmethyl adinazolam, and alprazolam in healthy volunteers

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam mesylate (10 mg), N-desmethyl adinazolam mesylate (NDMAD, 10 mg), and alprazolam (1 mg) were investigated in 9 healthy male subjects in a randomized, blinded, single-dose, 4-way crossover study. All drugs were intravenously infused over 30 minutes. Plasma adinazolam, NDMAD, and alprazolam concentrations, electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in the beta (12-30 Hz) range, performance on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), and subjective measures of mood and sedation were monitored for 12 to 24 hours. Mean pharmacokinetic parameters for adinazolam, NDMAD, and alprazolam, respectively, were as follows: volume of distribution (L), 106, 100, and 77; elimination half-life (hours), 2.9, 2.8, and 14.6; and clearance (mL/min), 444, 321, and 84. More than 80% of the total infused adinazolam dose was converted to systemically appearing NDMAD. All 3 benzodiazepine agonists significantly increased beta EEG activity, with alprazolam showing the strongest agonist activity and adinazolam showing the weakest activity. Alprazolam and NDMAD significantly decreased DSST performance, whereas adinazolam had no effect relative to placebo. Adinazolam, NDMAD, and alprazolam all produced significant observer-rated sedation. Plots of EEG effect versus plasma alprazolam concentration demonstrated counterclockwise hysteresis, consistent with an effect site delay. This was incorporated into a kinetic-dynamic model in which hypothetical effect site concentration was related to pharmacodynamic EEG effect via the sigmoid E(max) model, yielding an effect site equilibration half-life of 4.8 minutes. The exponential effect model described NDMAD pharmacokinetics and EEG pharmacodynamics. The relation of both alprazolam and NDMAD plasma concentrations to DSST performance could be described by a modified exponential model. Pharmacokinetic-dynamic modeling was not possible for adinazolam, as the data did not conform to any known concentration-effect model. Collectively, these results indicate that the benzodiazepine-like effects occurring after adinazolam administration are mediated by mainly NDMAD.

Human variability and noncancer risk assessment- An analysis of the default uncertainty factor

A 10-fold uncertainty factor is used for noncancer risk assessments to allow for possible interindividual differences between humans in the fate of the chemical in the body (kinetics) and target organ sensitivity (dynamics). Analysis of a database on the variability in each of these aspects is consistent with an even subdivision of the 10-fold factor into 10(0.5) (3.16) for kinetics and 10(0.5) (3.16) for dynamics. Analysis of the number of subjects in a normally and log-normally distributed population which would not be covered by factors of 3.16 supports this subdivision and also the use of a 10-fold factor to allow for both aspects. Analysis of kinetic data for subgroups of the population indicates that the standard default value of 3.16 for kinetics will not be adequate for all routes of elimination and all groups of the population. A scheme is proposed which would allow the selection of appropriate default uncertainty factors based on knowledge of the biological fate and effects of the chemical under review. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam: multi-ethnic comparisons

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam and N-demethyladinazolam (NDMAD), its major active metabolite, were compared in 39 healthy male volunteers (13 Asian, 12 Caucasian and 14 African-American). In a four-way, double-blind crossover design, subjects were administered (1) 30 mg oral adinazolam mesylate SR tablets, (2) 10 mg parenteral (i.v.) adinazolam mesylate, (3) 30 mg i.v. NDMAD and (4) placebo. Venous blood samples were collected at specific time intervals after drug administration and assayed for adinazolam and NDMAD concentrations. Sedation was rated at the time of each blood draw according to the Nurse-Rated Sedation Scale, and the digit-symbol substitution test was administered to evaluate psychomotor performance. After i.v. administration of adinazolam, Asians manifested significantly higher Cmax, larger AUC and lower CL of both adinazolam and NDMAD than their Caucasian and African-American counterparts. Likewise, after i.v. NDMAD Asians had significantly higher NDMAD Cmax and AUC than Caucasians and African-Americans. Most of these differences remained statistically significant after controlling for body surface area. With PO adinazolam, Asians also manifested substantially higher Cmax, larger AUC and lower CL for both adinazolam and NDMAD; however, with the exception of Cmax, these differences did not reach statistical significance. These results are in accordance with previous observations for ethnic-related differences in drug pharmacokinetics. In contrast, pharmacodynamic differences were not noted among the three study groups.

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of whole and half tablets of sustained-release adinazolam mesylate

The mechanism of release from sustained-release adinazolam mesylate tablets was assessed by the Higuchi equation and by analysis of drug release profiles through 60% released using the Peppas equation. Computed values of the diffusional exponent, n, ranged from 0.59 to 0.66. Values of n in this range are consistent with a mixed mechanism of release, with diffusion of drug through the hydrated polymer matrix and relaxation of this matrix being the principal processes controlling release. The rate of in vitro drug release was increased for half tablets relative to whole tablets and is attributed to an increase in the surface to volume ratio of half tablets of about 16%. This increase in surface-to-volume ratio of half tablets was reflected by an increase in the constant, k, from the Peppas equation of 20-23% and by an increase in the slope of Higuchi plots of 12-18% for four lots of tablets. In vivo/in vitro relationships from two bioavailability studies were thoroughly evaluated. Using either a linear or a quadratic relationship, an in vivo/in vitro correlation exists for sustained-release adinazolam mesylate tablets.