Polyomavirus in kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients

Biopsy-proven BK virus nephropathy in kidney transplant patients: risk factors, prevalence and treatment approach

Purpose: BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) is a latent infection and it is closely associated with immunsuppressive therapy. We aimed in this study to evaluate biopsy-proven BKVN and investigate frequency, risk factors and treatment management. Materials and Methods: In this study, 422 kidney transplant recipients were analysed retrospectively between April 2014 and April 2020 for biopsy-proven BK virus nephropathy. Group I included 16 kidney transplant patients with biopsy-proven BK nephropathy and group II included 36 kidney transplant patients with negative BK virus nephropathy. We aimed demographic, clinical features of kidney transplant recipients with BKVN (group I, n: 16 ) and non-BKVN (group II, n:36) were compared and the factors affecting of BKVN. Results: The mean age of grup I and group II were were 41±14.8 years and 39±15.2 respectively. The patients mean follow-up period of 43±11.2 months. Serum creatinine and proteinuria degree were significantly higher in the group with BKVN. In order to reduce the dose of immunosuppression in patients with BKVN, tacrolimus treatment was discontinued in 8 patients, and they were switched to everolimus + MMF + prednisone treatment, leflunamide + MMF + prednisone treatment in 4 patients, and sirolimus + MMF + prednisone treatment in 4 patients. The mean serum creatinine level of the patients who were followed up were observed as 1.78±0.98 mg/dl in group I. Conclusion: In our center, the prevalance of BKVN was found 3.92% during the study period. Reduction of dose immunosuppressive therapy is the most effective treatment. It is thought that there was no differences between Leflunamide and other approaches for treatment. Early diagnosis and screening (frequently intervals) seems to be most effective way for BKVN.

Polyoma BK Virus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Screening, Monitoring, and Management

Polyomavirus BK virus (BKPyV) infection is an important complication of kidney transplantation and allograft failure. The prevalence of viremia is 10%-15%, compared with BK-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) at 3%-5%. Given that there are no effective antiviral prophylaxis or treatment strategies for BKPyVAN, active screening to detect BKPyV viremia is recommended, particularly during the early posttransplant period. Immunosuppression reduction to allow viral clearance may avoid progression to severe and irreversible allograft damage. The frequency and duration of screening are highly variable between transplant centers because the evidence is reliant largely on observational data. While the primary treatment goals center on achieving viral clearance through immunosuppression reduction, prevention of subsequent acute rejection, premature graft loss, and return to dialysis remain as major challenges. Treatment strategies for BKPyV infection should be individualized to the recipient's underlying immunological risk and severity of the allograft infection. Efficacy data for adjuvant therapies including intravenous immunoglobulin and cidofovir are sparse. Future well-powered and high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to inform evidence-based clinical practice for the management of BKPy infection.

Alkoxylalkyl Esters of Nucleotide Analogs Inhibit Polyomavirus DNA Replication and Large T Antigen Activities

Polyomavirus infections occur commonly in humans and are normally nonfatal. However, in immunocompromised individuals, they are intractable and frequently fatal. Due to a lack of approved drugs to treat polyomavirus infections, cidofovir, a phosphonate nucleotide analog approved to treat cytomegalovirus infections, has been repurposed as an antipolyomavirus agent. Cidofovir has been modified in various ways to improve its efficacies as a broad-spectrum antiviral agent. However, the actual mechanisms and targets of cidofovir and its modified derivatives as antipolyomavirus agents are still under research. Here, polyomavirus large tumor antigen (Tag) activities were identified as the viral target of cidofovir derivatives. The alkoxyalkyl ester derivatives of cidofovir efficiently inhibit polyomavirus DNA replication in cell-free human extracts and a viral in vitro replication system utilizing only purified proteins. We present evidence that DNA helicase and DNA binding activities of polyomavirus Tags are diminished in the presence of low concentrations of alkoxyalkyl ester derivatives of cidofovir, suggesting that the inhibition of viral DNA replication is at least in part mediated by inhibiting single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) binding activities of Tags. These findings show that the alkoxyalkyl ester derivatives of cidofovir are effective in vitro without undergoing further conversions, and we conclude that the inhibitory mechanisms of nucleotide analog-based drugs are more complex than previously believed.

Renal Allograft Biopsies with Polyomavirus BK Nephropathy: Turin Transplant Center, 2015-19

Background: In kidney transplant patients, polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) represents a serious complication; the key factor for the development of PVAN is immunosuppression level and modulation of anti-rejection treatment represents the first line of intervention. Allograft biopsy and histology remain the criterion standard for diagnosing PVAN. Methods: All consecutive renal biopsies with the diagnosis of PVAN carried out at the University Hospital City of Health and Science of Turin over a five-years period were studied. Renal allograft biopsy was performed due to renal function alterations associated to medium-high polyomavirus BK (BKV)-DNA levels on plasma specimen. Results: A total of 21 patients underwent a first biopsy to diagnose a possible BKV nephropathy, in 18, a second biopsy was made, in eight, a third biopsy, and finally, three underwent the fourth renal biopsy; following the results of each biopsies, immunosuppressant agents dosages were modified in order to reduce the effect of PVAN. Conclusions: In this study, the clinical and histological features of 21 kidney transplant recipients with BKV reactivation and development of PVAN are described. To date, the only treatment for PVAN consists in the reduction of immunosuppressive agents, constantly monitoring viral load.

Low-dose cidofovir and conversion to mTOR-based immunosuppression in polyomavirus-associated nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) remains a relevant complication following kidney transplantation with allograft loss rates of up to 50%. Reduction in overall immunosuppression is a cornerstone of therapy, whereas no specific antiviral regimen has shown conclusive benefit to date. The present case series demonstrates the efficacy of a dual therapeutic approach with low-dose cidofovir and conversion to mTOR-based immunosuppression in PVAN.

METHODS

Patients with biopsy-proven PVAN having received low-dose cidofovir (0.25 mg/kg) according to the Tübingen Cidofovir Protocol and been converted to mTOR-based immunosuppression were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients with a median follow-up of 2.24 [IQR 1.55-5.01] years were included in the analysis. Median time to PVAN diagnosis was 268 [IQR 153-869] days after transplantation. Polyomavirus clearance from plasma was achieved in 78% of patients after a median of 118 [IQR 76-293] days. Of the 23 patients, nine patients (39%) lost their allograft function during follow-up, but only three of these (13%) due to PVAN. Fourteen patients (61%) stabilized or improved allograft function. The cidofovir protocol allowed for specific antiviral therapy without adverse nephrotoxicity, even in patients with low allograft function.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose cidofovir and conversion to mTOR-based immunosuppression allow for effective virus clearance and preservation of allograft function in a high proportion of patients with PVAN and progressive allograft dysfunction and may prolong allograft survival in these patients.

BK viremia and nephropathy in pediatric renal transplant recipients

The renal survival rate of pediatric renal transplant recipients (pRTR) has improved with the use of modern immunosuppressive agents; however, the incidence of post-transplantation viral infection has increased. This study investigated the incidence of BK viremia and BK viral-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) in pRTR. One-hundred-and-thirty-four pRTR were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 20, 14.9%) comprised those who were prospectively followed with longitudinal analyses after renal transplantation in the time period from May 2007 to June 2008, while group 2 (n = 114, 85.1%) cross-sectional study of those who were transplanted from January 1994 to April 2007. The mean ages at transplantation in groups 1 and 2 were 10.6 ± 4.7 years and 7.8 ± 4.5 years, respectively. BK viremia was detected in four (20.0%) patients in group 1, and seven (6.1%) in group 2 (P = 0.04), with increased incidence associated with induction therapy. The median time to detection of BK viremia after transplantation was 44 days in group 1 and 142 days in group 2. BKVAN was diagnosed in three patients (two in group 1 and one in group 2). All three patients diagnosed with BKVAN were receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids as maintenance immunosuppression. Reducing immunosuppression resulted in reduced BK viremia. Monitoring for BK viremia and BKVAN is important in pRTR being treated with the current immunosuppressive regimen. The first line of treatment for BK viremia remains careful reduction of immunosuppression and close monitoring of renal allograft function.

Determination of viremia cut-off for risk to develop BKPyV-associated nephropathy among kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV)-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is a consequence of BKPyV replication in the urinary tract in kidney transplant recipients (KTR).

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to determine the prevalence of BKPyV replication and BKPyVAN, risk factors associated to sustained viremia and BKPyVAN, and viremia cut-off that best predict the occurrence of sustained viremia and nephropathy in KTR of a single University Hospital Kidney Transplant Center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All KTR undergoing transplantation from August 2010 to December 2011 were enrolled and monitored up to 2 years posttransplantation for BKPyV viruria by decoy cells shedding or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and viremia by PCR. Kidney biopsy was indicated if sustained viremia (two or more viremia above 10 000 copies/mL) to confirm BKPyVAN diagnosis.

RESULTS

In this study, 326 transplants were performed and 246 patients were included. Prevalence of viruria was 36.9%, viremia 22.3% and nephropathy 3.2%. Male gender was the only risk factor associated to sustained viremia or nephropathy. Cut-off value of viremia that best discriminates the progression to sustained viremia and to BKPyVAN was 37 488 and 44 956 copies/mL, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of viruria, viremia, and nephropathy were similar to those reported in literature but the cut-off value of viremia that best discriminates the risk of progression to nephropathy was greater than the value usually reported, which is 10 000 copies/mL.

BK virus: microbiology, epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations and treatment

Background: BK virus infection is common but is usually asymptomatic. However, it can become life threatening as severe hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) or the polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) particularly in immune compromised and transplant recipients. Some investigators have studied the pathophysiology and there are anecdotal and uncontrolled studies of therapy with few conclusions allowing treatment guidelines. Objectives: Summarize literature review of current knowledge concerning the nature, epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of this common virus infection. Results: HC is a not uncommon and often misdiagnosed infection from BK virus. It is usually self limited but can become life threatening in immune compromised patients. PVAN threatens survival of transplanted kidneys and is difficult to differentiate from rejection without sophisticated molecular diagnostic technology. We have sufficient information for making a diagnosis of BK virus disease by using clinical, serological and molecular technology. Studies using manipulation of immunosuppression and a variety of antiviral agents, including cidofovir, leflunomide, intravenous immunoglobulin, vidarabine, fluroquinolones, have been published but most were uncontrolled reports of few cases. Cidofovir offers some promise but more must be learned before there is hope for evidence-based treatment guidelines.

Infection in Kidney Transplantation

Infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation. It has been estimated that 70% of kidney transplant recipients will experience an infection episode within the first 3 years after transplantation (Dharnidharka et al. 2007). After cardiovascular disease, infection is the second leading cause of death in recipients with allograft function (Snyder et al. 2009). The immunosuppressive therapy required to prevent organ rejection places the kidney transplant recipient at increased risk for donor-derived, nosocomial, and community-acquired infections as well as reactivation of latent pathogens. Pretransplant screening, immunizations, and optimal antibacterial and antiviral prophylaxis can help to reduce the impact of infection. Awareness of the approach to infection in the transplant recipient including diagnostic and management strategies is essential to optimizing outcomes.

BK viremia surveillance and outcomes in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

While screening for asymptomatic BK viremia (BKV) has been well studied in isolated kidney transplant recipients, there is a paucity of published outcomes in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients who underwent BKV screening followed by pre-emptive reduction in immunosuppression.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective review of 31 consecutive SPK recipients who were transplanted over a 5-year period following the initiation of a serum BKV screening protocol.

RESULTS

BK viremia developed in 11 (35.5%) patients, and all patients achieved complete viral clearance following reduction in immunosuppression. Two patients (6.5%) developed BK virus nephropathy, but both had preserved allograft function. One patient developed mild rejection of the kidney allograft following clearance of BKV, and two patients developed mild rejection of the pancreas allograft after reduction in immunosuppression, but there were no kidney or pancreas allograft losses due to rejection. The development of BK viremia did not impact overall patient survival or kidney and pancreas allograft survival.

CONCLUSION

Screening asymptomatic SPK recipients for BKV followed by reduction in maintenance immunosuppression appears to be an effective strategy to prevent kidney allograft dysfunction and graft loss due to BK virus nephropathy, without compromising pancreas allograft outcomes.

Sex differences in transplantation

Sex plays a role in the incidence and progression of a wide variety of diseases and conditions related to transplantation. Additionally, a growing body of clinical and experimental evidence suggests that sex can impact the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of several commonly used immunosuppressive and anti-infective drugs in transplant recipients. A better understanding of these sex differences will facilitate advances in individualizing treatment for patients and improve outcomes of solid organ transplantation. Here, we provide a review of sex-related differences in transplantation and highlight opportunities for future research directions.

Polyomavirus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation

Polyomavirus nephropathy has become an important complication in kidney transplantation, with a prevalence of 1% to 8%. Unfortunately, the risk factors for polyomavirus nephropathy and renal allograft loss are not well defined. The definitive diagnosis is made through assessment of a kidney transplant biopsy. Recently, noninvasive urine and serum markers have been used to assist in polyomavirus nephropathy diagnosis and monitoring. Primary treatment is immunosuppression reduction, but must be balanced with the risks of rejection. No antiviral treatments for polyomavirus nephropathy have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Although cidofovir has shown in vitro activity against murine polyomaviruses, and has been effective in some patients, it is associated with significant nephrotoxicity. Graft loss due to polyomavirus nephropathy should not be a contraindication to retransplantation; however, experience is limited. This review presents potential risk factors, screening, diagnostic and monitoring methods, therapeutic management, and retransplantation experience for polyomavirus nephropathy.

Risk Factors for the Development of BK Virus Nephropathy in Renal Transplant Recipients

The BK polyoma virus has, in recent years, become a significant cause of renal allograft dysfunction and failure. Among 260 adult kidney transplant recipients, those with biopsy-proven BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) were compared with those without BKVN with regard to gender, age, race, rejection episodes, time on dialysis, number of organs transplanted, HLA match, live donor versus deceased donor, cold ischemia time, delayed graft function, cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus of donor and recipient, induction therapy, and maintenance immunosuppression. Episodes of rejection (35.7% of patients with BKVN vs 8.5% of patients without BKVN; P = .01), transplantation of >1 organ (35.7% of patients with BKVN vs 9.0% of patients without BKVN; P = .01), positive CMV serology in both donor and recipient (71.4% of patients with BKVN vs 41.1% of patients without BKVN; P = .03), and a greater cumulative dose of daclizumab use at the time of induction (2.24 ± 0.05 mg/kg in patients with BKVN vs 2.03 ± 0.14 mg/kg in patients without BKVN; P = .04) were statistically significant risk factors for the development of BKVN. Those who developed BKVN received a higher mean cumulative dose of rabbit antithymoglobulin for induction therapy, but that difference failed to achieve statistical significance (P = .07).

Simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant recipients present with late-onset BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Infections have increased in simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant recipients (SPKTRs) with BK polyomavirus (BKV)-associated nephropathy (BKVN) being the most important infectious cause of allograft loss. Comparisons of BKVN with kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), however, are lacking.

METHODS

We studied all SPKTRs and KTRs at our transplant centre between 2003 and 2012. Eleven of 106 SPKTs (10.4%) and 21 of 1062 KTRs (2.0%) were diagnosed with BKVN with allograft loss in 1 SPKTR (9.1%) and 2 KTRs (9.5%). A control of 95 SPKTRs without BKVN was used for comparison.

RESULTS

SPKTRs showed an increased incidence of BKVN compared with KTRs (P < 0.001). Onset of BKVN in SPKTRs was significantly later compared with KTRs (P = 0.033). While 67% of KTRs showed early-onset BKVN, 64% of SPKTRs developed late-onset BKVN. Older recipient age and male gender increased the risk of BKVN in SPKTRs (P < 0.05). No differences were observed for patient and allograft survival (P > 0.05). However, SPKTRs with BKVN showed inferior estimated glomerular filtration rate and a higher incidence of de novo donor-specific antibodies compared with SPKTRs without BKVN in long-term follow-up (P < 0.05). SPKTRs showed higher peak BKV loads, a need for more intense therapeutic intervention and were more likely not to recover to baseline creatinine after BKVN (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest a higher incidence, more severe course and inferior outcome of BKVN in SPKTRs. An increased vulnerability of the allograft kidney due to inferior organ quality may predispose KTRs to early-onset BKVN. In contrast, SPKTRs present with late-onset BKVN in the presence of high-dose immunosuppression.

Interaction Between Human Polyomavirus BK and Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1 alpha

BK polyomavirus (BKV) has a worldwide seroprevalence of approximately 90%. After primary infection, BKV establishes a life-long latency within the urogenital tract. The severe immunological impairment occurring in renal transplant recipients leads to BKV reactivation, which may result in polyomavirus associated nephropathy (PVAN). While the transplanted kidney is transiently unperfused, Hypoxia Inducible Factors (HIFs) mediate the cellular response to hypoxia. The α-subunit of HIF isoform 1 (HIF-1α) may interact with several viruses, but until now, there has been no information regarding the interaction between BKV and HIF-1α. The aim of this study is to investigate the possible interaction between HIF-1α and BKV and its potential effect on the pathogenesis of PVAN. Screening of 17 kidney tissue samples revealed that HIF-1α expression was 13.6-fold higher in PVAN tissues compared to control tissues. A luminometric assay in co-transfected African green monkey kidney cells (VERO) demonstrated BKV promoter activation ranging from two to sixfold (P < 0.05) when HIF-1α was over-expressed. A Chromatin ImmunoPrecipitation (ChIP) assay showed structural binding between the BKV promoter and HIF-1α. The amount of BKV DNA increased by threefold in VERO infected cells that were exposed to simulated hypoxia, compared to the cells not subjected to hypoxia. Both ex vivo and in vitro interactions between HIF-1α and BKV were observed, suggesting that HIF-1α, stabilized during transplantation, may be able to bind the BKV promoter and enhance BKV replication. Thus, hypoxia should be considered a risk factor for the development of PVAN in kidney transplant recipients.

BK virus nephropathy in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplant: a potentially preventable cause of kidney allograft loss

More than half of the simultaneous pancreas kidney transplant (SPK) patients afflicted with BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) lose their kidney allograft. Fear of pancreatic rejection limits the ability to reduce immunosuppression; this may result in inadequate treatment of BKVN. This single-center retrospective review included 138 SPK patients who underwent periodic BKV screening and were managed with IS reduction alone as a treatment of choice for BKVN. All patients underwent rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) induction and were maintained on tacrolimus/sirolimus or mycophenolate. The incidence of BKVN was 4.4%. BKVN was diagnosed at a median of 11 months; mean serum creatinine 2.1 mg/dL and the geometric mean BK serum viral load at diagnosis 1,758,000 DNA copies/mL. Median time to BKV clearance was 5.6 months; there was 96% reduction in the mycophenolate dose, 100% reduction in sirolimus, and 40% reduction in the tacrolimus blood level at BKVN clearance. No BKVN-related kidney failure was noted, and patients retained excellent kidney and pancreatic allograft function till last follow-up (43 months). BKVN in SPK is a potentially preventable cause of end-stage kidney disease, and IS reduction alone is an acceptable treatment modality in SPK without a higher risk of kidney/pancreas allograft loss as long as close monitoring can be ensured.

The influence of immunosuppressive agents on BK virus risk following kidney transplantation, and implications for choice of regimen

The increasing incidence of BK-associated nephropathy following kidney transplantation has prompted an examination of strategies for risk reduction and management through immunosuppression manipulation. Evidence from retrospective and prospective studies suggests that BK viruria and viremia, and the need for BK virus treatment, are higher with tacrolimus than cyclosporine. Combined therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid may be associated with a particularly higher risk of BK infection, but data are conflicting as to whether mycophenolic acid per se is an independent risk factor. The incidence of BK-related events may be reduced in patients receiving mTOR inhibitors (everolimus or sirolimus) with cyclosporine vs a calcineurin inhibitor with mycophenolic acid. De novo immunosuppression regimens that avoid rabbit antithymocyte globulin and tacrolimus, particularly tacrolimus with mycophenolic acid, may be advantageous, whereas low-exposure cyclosporine with an mTOR inhibitor appears a favorable option. Routine screening for BK infection during the first 2 years posttransplant is recommended to allow preemptive modification of the immunosuppressive regimen. In patients at high risk of BK virus infection, appropriate de novo immunosuppression or very early conversion to an mTOR inhibitor to facilitate reduction or discontinuation of calcineurin inhibitors or antimetabolites should be considered. Extensive further research into optimal avoidance, screening, and treatment strategies is required.

BK virus nephropathy after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) was reported in up to 7.5% of patients after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK). Its management by reduction in immunosuppression might pre-dispose to pancreatic graft loss.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 178 SPK recipients was performed. All patients received thymoglobulin, daclizumab and a maintenance of low-dose steroids, tacrolimus, and either sirolimus or mycophenolate.

RESULTS

Two (1.1%) patients were identified with BKVN. Time of diagnosis was 22 and 45 months after transplant. Both patients had superimposed calcineurin toxicity in their graft biopsies. Immunosuppression was reduced in both patients, and leflunomide (LEF) was used in one patient. Concurrent kidney rejection episodes were treated with steroid pulses in both patients. One kidney graft improved with a last estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 43 mL/min, and another kidney graft showed limited improvement with a last GFR of 30 mL/min. Pancreatic graft function remained excellent in both patients as assessed by serum c-peptide, glycosylated hemoglobin, amylase-lipase, and urine amylase levels.

CONCLUSION

Low incidence of BKVN was observed in our SPK series. Reduction in immunosuppression and sometimes LEF can be effective. The underlying mechanism of stable pancreatic allograft function despite ongoing kidney rejection warrants further investigation.

Renal failure five years after lung transplantation due to polyomavirus BK-associated nephropathy

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN) is rare in nonrenal solid organ transplantation and only limited information is available from single cases. We describe a 67-year-old female presenting with hypertension and progressive kidney failure due to PyVAN 60 months after lung transplantation. Plasma BK virus (BKV) loads were 4.85 log¹⁰ copies/mL at diagnosis and cleared slowly over 14 months after switching from tacrolimus, mycophenolate and prednisone to low-dose tacrolimus, sirolimus and leflunomide, the latter being discontinued for anemia and diarrhea. BKV- and JC virus-specific immunoglobulins were detectable prior to transplantation. Only BKV-specific IgG and IgM increased during follow-up. BKV-specific T cells were detectable in blood following in vitro expansion, but cleared with reincreased sirolimus, yet BKV viremia remained undetectable. We identified eight other cases of PyVAN in nonrenal solid organ transplantation including lung (n = 1), heart (n = 6) and pancreas (n = 1). Overall, diagnosis was later than commonly seen in kidney transplants (median 18 months, interquartile range 10-29). Seven patients were male, five received triple immunosuppression consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate, prednisone. Immunosuppression was reduced in four cases and cidofovir and/or leflunomide administered in five and two cases, respectively. Renal function deteriorated in five requiring hemodialysis in four. We discuss mTOR inhibitors versus cidofovir and leflunomide as potential PyVAN rescue therapy.

Treatment of polyomavirus infection in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review

BACKGROUND.: Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is an important cause of kidney graft loss but there is no consensus on its management. This study aimed to systematically document all published treatments for PVAN to determine the most effective therapy. METHODS.: A computerized search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases (1950-2008) was performed. References from review articles and published abstracts from the American Transplant Congress (2005-2008) were also included. Study selection criteria included (a) population: adult (>18 years) kidney-only, primary or repeat renal transplant recipients; (b) setting: polyoma viruria, viremia or biopsy-proven PVAN or both; and (c) treatment: immunosuppression reduction alone or with adjuvant agents. The primary outcome was graft failure rate, and secondary outcomes included acute rejection rate, elimination of viruria and viremia, graft function, patient survival, and adverse events. RESULTS.: Of 555 identified citations, 40 studies examining the effect of immunosuppression reduction alone or in combination with cidofovir, leflunomide, intravenous immunoglobulin, or ciprofloxacin were included for appraisal. Pooled results found a death-censored graft loss rate of 8/100 patient-years for immunosuppression reduction alone and 8 and 13/100 patient-years for the addition of cidofovir or leflunomide, respectively. CONCLUSIONS.: There does not seem to be a graft survival benefit of adding cidofovir or leflunomide to immunosuppression reduction for the management of PVAN. However, the evidence base is poor and highlights the urgent need for adequately powered randomized trials to define the optimal treatment of this important condition.

Maintenance immunosuppressive agents as risk factors for BK virus nephropathy: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

The specific role of different immunosuppressive agents as risk factors for BK virus nephropathy (BKN) has not been well studied.

METHODS

In this case-control study, we examined the association of tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone with BKN in renal allograft recipients transplanted between 1997 and 2004 at our center who underwent biopsies for allograft dysfunction. Drug levels or doses were recorded during the 3 months before the index biopsy. Random effects logistic modeling was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

There were 33 cases with BKN, biopsied at 16.4+/-2.8 months and 66 matched controls with biopsies at 21.5+/-2.1 months posttransplant (P=0.16). After adjusting for sex, race, retransplant status, diabetes, donor source, and induction agent, TAC blood level was associated with increased risk of BKN (odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.7, P=0.03), whereas MMF dose was not (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.99-1.0, P=0.2). Moreover, prednisone dose was also found to be a significant risk factor for BKN (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.04-1.4, P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that BKN is associated with TAC level and prednisone dose and not with MMF dose. This suggests that reducing TAC and prednisone dose and maintaining MMF may be a more appropriate initial approach for the treatment of BKN. Further studies are needed to compare the efficacy and safety of this approach with the currently recommended one.

Development of BK nephropathy in recipients of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

BK nephropathy (BKVN) is a significant cause of graft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients, but its course in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) recipients is less well studied. The presence of dual organs limits the ability to reduce maintenance immunosuppression, typically the first intervention in the management of BKVN.

METHODS

A single center, retrospective review was conducted of 205 SPK transplants performed from January 1, 2000 to April 30, 2006.

RESULTS

The 5-year actuarial cumulative rate of BKVN was 5.6%. Diagnosis occurred at a median of 20 months after transplant; mean serum creatinine was 2.6, and geometric mean BK serum viral load was 709,274 copies/mL at diagnosis. There was no statistical difference in the cumulative rate according to the use of induction therapy: rabbit antilymphocyte globulin (5-year rate 6.8%, 4/59), alemtuzumab (5-year rate 5.1%, 5/146). Treatment consisted of immunosuppression reduction and half received cidofovir. Eight of nine kidney allografts eventually failed, but all patients retained pancreatic allograft function.

CONCLUSIONS

BKVN occurs in 5.6% of SPK recipients. There is no difference in the cumulative rate of BKVN between patients who received alemtuzumab or rabbit antilymphocyte globulin.

Risk factors for polyoma virus nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Polyoma virus-associated nephropathy (PVN) is a common cause of renal transplant failure. The risk factors for the development of PVN have not yet been studied in large cohorts of patients for periods of 20 years.

METHODS

We collected clinical, renal biopsy and urinary cytology data from all patients with renal transplantations performed at the University Hospital of Basel from 1985 to 2005. All patients with a renal biopsy and urine cytology were included (n = 880). Renal transplants were divided into three groups, according to evidence of polyoma virus (PV) infection (decoy cells in the urine) and biopsy-proven PVN: Renal transplants without evidence of a PV infection (n = 751). Renal transplants with PV reactivation, e.g. decoy cell (DC) found by urinary cytology, but without PVN (n = 90). Renal transplants with PVN (n = 39).

RESULTS

The prevalence of biopsy-proven PVN in this cohort of patients was 3.3%. Immunosuppression with mycophenolate and/or tacrolimus, ATGAM, male gender of the recipient and a higher number of transplant rejection episodes were factors significantly associated with PVN development.

CONCLUSIONS

The most important risk factors for the development of PVN are acute rejection and ATGAM used as induction therapy as well as tacrolimus and mycophenolate as maintenance therapy. Therefore, we conclude that patients with tacrolimus and mycophenolate maintenance therapy should be carefully monitored for the development of PVN.

The effect of low-dose cidofovir on the long-term outcome of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) has an unfavourable impact on graft survival. The cornerstone of therapy is early reduction of immunosuppressive medications; however, the rate of graft failure is still high. Antiviral drugs, such as cidofovir, are thought to have therapeutic effects, but the benefits of cidofovir in retarding the deterioration of PVAN are still a controversial issue.

METHODS

Fourteen renal kidney recipients were diagnosed to have biopsy-proven PVAN between 2001 and 2006 in Chung-Shan Medical University Center with nearly 600 renal transplant recipients. After the diagnosis of PVAN, all patients were treated with a reduction of their original immunosuppressive medications with/without converting tacrolimus to cyclosporine. Eight of the 14 patients agreed to receive low-dose cidofovir (0.5 mg/kg) every 2 weeks for a total of six doses.

RESULTS

During 30 +/- 18 months of follow-up, three (37%) patients in the cidofovir-treated and three (50%) patients in the non-cidofovir-treated group experienced graft loss (P = 0.64). The rejection rate before PVAN diagnosis or other baseline characteristics of the patients between two groups were not significantly different. The long-term survival rate to graft loss and major graft functional decline with Kaplan-Meier analysis between the two groups were not significantly different (P = 0.898 and P = 0.243). In all demographic and clinical characteristics, we found that there was a tendency towards long-term major graft functional decline in the patients with acute rejection prior to PVAN diagnosis (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that (1) there was no obvious effect of low-dose cidofovir on long-term graft survival in patients with PVAN, and (2) acute rejection prior to PVAN diagnosis was a potential risk factor for poorer long-term graft outcome.

Postoperative infectious complications of abdominal solid organ transplantation

There is a rapidly growing population of immunocompromised organ transplant recipients. These patients are at risk of a large variety of infections that have significant consequences on mortality, graft dysfunction, and graft loss. The diagnosis and treatment of these infections are facilitated by an understanding of the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative risk factors; the typical pathogens; and their characteristic time of presentation. On the basis of these factors, we put forth an algorithm for diagnosing and treating suspected infections in solid organ transplant recipients.

BK virus nephropathy in renal transplant patients in London

BACKGROUND

BK nephropathy (BKN) is an important cause of renal transplant dysfunction, believed to be associated with higher levels of immunosuppression. We assessed the experience of BKN in renal transplant patients in the London region.

METHODS

All six London transplant centers participated and case notes of patients with BKN in 2004 to 2005 were reviewed.

RESULTS

There were 17 cases of BKN, giving an incidence of 2.1%. Median time to diagnosis was 9 months. Median baseline creatinine rose from 150 to 196 mumol/L. At diagnosis, 16 patients were on tacrolimus, 15 on mycophenolate mofetil, and 10 on triple therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone. Management of BKN involved reducing immunosuppression; cidofovir was used in two patients and methylprednisolone in five for acute rejection. Median follow-up time was 29.2 months. Creatinine returned to baseline in four patients, remained elevated in 12 and one patient lost his graft. The new median baseline creatinine was 216 mumol/L. Eight patients underwent repeat biopsies of which four became negative for BKV and three subsequently cleared the virus on blood and urine polymerase chain reaction and urine decoy cells. Overall, eight patients cleared the virus. None of age, sex, viral load, or biopsy characteristics (Banff ct score, Drachenberg grade, and number of BKV positive cells) were associated with poorer outcome when patients with increase in creatinine of less than 30% (n=7) or more than 30% (n=10) from baseline were compared.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of BKN in this study is comparable with previous studies, with more favorable outcomes. It supports the association of BKN with potent immunosuppression.

The prevalence of BK polyomavirus infection in outpatient kidney transplant recipients followed in a single center

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection has emerged as an important cause of renal allograft loss. There is no proven therapy, and much basic clinical information is still lacking.

METHODS

We serially enrolled 95 outpatient renal transplant recipients (43% of whom were African American) in a single center cross-sectional screening study to determine the prevalence of BKV infection by whole blood polymerase chain reaction, and the prevalence of decoy cells by urinalysis and cytology. We also investigated the demographic and clinical factors associated with BKV infection, and the performance of urinalysis for decoy cells as a screening test for BKV infection.

RESULTS

The point prevalence of active BKV viremia was 7.4%. When subjects without active viremia but with a history of viremia and/or nephropathy were included, the overall prevalence was 15.8%. Urinary decoy cells were common, present in 50% of subjects at study entry. Urinalysis for decoy cells as a screen for BKV viremia had a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 52%, positive predictive value of 13% and negative predictive value of 98%.

CONCLUSIONS

Decoy cells on urinalysis were the only factor independently associated with an increased risk of BKV infection on multivariate analysis. Although associated with BKV infection on univariate analysis, thymoglobulin, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus use were not independently associated with BKV infection on multivariate analysis, neither were history of acute rejection, gender, race, nor cause of end-stage renal disease.

Viral infection after renal transplantation: surveillance and management

Viral infections remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality following renal transplantation. Although cytomegalovirus is the most common opportunistic pathogen seen in transplant recipients, numerous other viruses have also affected outcomes. In some cases, preventive measures such as pretransplant screening, prophylactic antiviral therapy, or post transplant viral monitoring may limit the impact of these infections. Recent advances in laboratory monitoring and antiviral therapy have improved outcomes. This review will summarize the major viral infections seen following transplant and discuss strategies for prevention and management of these potential pathogens.

Polyomavirus polymerase chain reaction as a surrogate marker of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is a significant cause of allograft loss after renal transplantation. A noninvasive assay that can guide the evaluation of PVAN would be of clinical value. We compared the utility of BK virus (BKV) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and urine cytology in screening for concurrent PVAN.

METHODS

We used PCR to test urine and plasma samples from renal recipients simultaneously for BKV DNA. Additionally, we tested urine samples for decoy cells. Sample results were correlated with biopsy-proven PVAN. Receiver-operator characteristic curves were used to determine viral load thresholds associated with concurrent PVAN.

RESULTS

In this cross-sectional study, BKV viruria, viremia, and urinary decoy cells were detected in 24%, 9%, and 13% of renal recipients, respectively. Among 114 patients who had renal allograft biopsy, four (3.5%) were diagnosed with PVAN. Using pathology as gold standard for the diagnosis of PVAN, BKV viremia threshold of >1.6E+04 copies/mL had 100% sensitivity, 96% specificity, 50% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. A BKV viruria threshold of >2.5E+07 copies/mL had 100% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 31% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. In contrast, urine decoy cells had 25% sensitivity, 84% specificity, 5% positive predictive value, and 97% negative predictive value for the diagnosis of concurrent PVAN.

CONCLUSION

BKV PCR may be a clinically useful noninvasive test to identify renal recipients with concurrent PVAN. BKV DNA >1.6E+04 copies/mL of plasma and >2.5E+07 copies/mL of urine were highly associated with concurrent PVAN whereas a negative PCR test makes the diagnosis of PVAN highly unlikely.

BK Virus–Associated Nephropathy in Sirolimus-Treated Renal Transplant Patients: Incidence, Course, and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Because the course of polyoma virus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) has not been evaluated in a large cohort of patients receiving sirolimus (SRL)-based regimens, we have herein presented the incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of 378 renal transplant recipients treated with SRL-based immunosuppression.

METHODS

This retrospective single center study evaluated 344 kidney alone (KTX) and 34 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantations performed between June 2000 and December 2004.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 43.3 months, six kidney (1.7%) and three kidney-pancreas (9.0%) transplanted patients displayed biopsy-proven PVAN. The mean time to diagnosis after transplantation was 18.2 months (range: 3.5-31.1 months), with a higher incidence among patients exposed (4.23%) versus not exposed to rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG; 0.53%; P=0.019) or SPK (9.0%) versus KTX (1.7%) recipients (odds ratio: 5.43; confidence interval: 1.29-22.8; P=0.038). Despite treatment with cidofovir, reduced immunosuppression and maintenance therapy with no agents other than SRL (C0=10.2+/-2.7 ng/dL) plus modest doses of prednisone (< or =5 mg), five patients (55.5%) experienced renal allograft failure. No rejection episodes were documented during the PVAN treatment and pancreatic function continued to be excellent among the SPK patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with SRL-based immunosuppression showed an incidence at the lower end of the range described with various other contemporaneous immunosuppressive regimens and with other cohorts not undergoing BK virus polymerase chain reaction surveillance. Exposure to rATG and SPK transplantation represented risk factors for the occurrence of PVAN, which showed a pernicious course despite withdrawal of calcineurin antagonists and/or mycophenolate mofetil.

Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy in Renal Transplantation

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is an emerging disease in renal transplant patients with variable prevalence of 1-10% and graft loss up to 80%. BK virus (BKV) is the primary etiologic agent, but JC virus (JCV) and possibly simian virus SV40 may account for some cases. Intense immunosuppression is viewed as the most important risk factor. However, the preferential manifestation in renal transplants as compared to other allografts or to autologous kidneys of other organ transplants suggests that organ determinants and immunologic factors synergize: Renal tubular epithelial cells and their compensatory proliferation to restore tubular integrity after immunologic, ischemic or toxic injury may provide the critical cellular milieu supporting polyomavirus replication while immune control is impaired due to maintenance immunosuppression, anti-rejection treatment and HLA-mismatches. Patient determinants (older age, male gender, seronegative recipient), and viral factors (genotype, serotype) may have a contributory role. The definitive diagnosis of PVAN requires allograft biopsy which is, however, challenged by (i) limited sensitivity due to (multi-)focal involvement (sampling errors); (ii) varying presentations with cytopathic-inflammatory and/or fibrotic/scarring patterns; (iii) coexisting acute rejection which is difficult to differentiate, but impacts on intervention strategies. Screening for polyomavirus replication in the urine and in the plasma complements allograft biopsy by high sensitivity and allows for noninvasive monitoring. Thus, we suggest a terminology similar to invasive fungal diseases where viruria ("decoy cells") defines patients at risk ("possible PVAN") who should be evaluated for plasma viral load. Increasing BK viremia (>10,000 copies/mL) or urine VP-1 mRNA (>6.5x10(5) copies/ng total RNA) load defines "presumptive PVAN" for which an intervention of reducing immunosuppression should be considered even if the diagnosis could not be confirmed by allograft biopsy ("definitive PVAN"). The response to intervention should be monitored using plasma DNA or urine mRNA load.

Latent and Productive Polyomavirus Infections of Renal Allografts

Polyomavirus allograft nephropathy, also termed BK virus nephropathy (BKN) after the main causative agent, the polyoma-BK-virus strain, is a major complication following kidney transplantation. BKN is the most common viral infection affecting the renal allograft with a reported prevalence of 1% up to 10%. It often leads to chronic allograft dysfunction and graft loss. BKN is most likely caused by the reactivation of latent BK viruses which, under sustained and intensive immunosuppression, enter a replicative/productive cycle. Viral disease, i.e., BKN, is typically limited to the kidney transplant. It is histologically defined by the presence of intranuclear viral inclusion bodies in epithelial cells and severe tubular injury. Virally induced tubular damage is the morphological correlate for allograft dysfunction. In this chapter, different variants of polyomavirus intranuclear inclusion bodies [types 1 through 4] and adjunct techniques [immunohistochemistry, in-situ hybridization, electron microscopy and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)] that are used for proper characterization of disease are described. Special emphasis is placed on the clinical and pathophysiological significance of different histological stages of BKN.

Infecciones en el paciente con trasplante renal y pancreático

Infection can lead to graft loss and death in patients undergoing kidney and double kidney-pancreas transplantation. In this review, the prophylactic measures, the post-transplant timeline for the development of infections, and the most frequent infectious complications in patients with kidney and pancreas transplantation are described. Although great advances have been achieved in the prevention of infections, new problems have developed. Nosocomial bacterial infection with multidrug-resistant bacteria is an emerging complication. Cytomegalovirus is still the most frequent viral infection despite the advances in prevention measures. Moreover, in recent years polyomavirus type BK infection has been recognized as a major cause of renal graft loss. Knowledge of the infectious complications associated with these transplants and the risk factors for their occurrence will allow optimal therapeutic management of this patient population.

Prevalence and clinical course of BK virus nephropathy in pancreas after kidney transplant patients

The influence of BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) in pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation is unclear. A retrospective analysis of PAK transplants performed at our center was conducted to determine the impact of BKVN. Among 40 PAK transplants performed using sequential immunosuppression, four patients developed BKVN, as defined by a >20% rise in serum creatinine and BK viremia (BK plasma load >4 log copies/mL), at a median of 19 months following PAK. In all four patients, treatment of BKVN consisted of reduction in tacrolimus, cessation of mycophenolate mofetil, and introduction of leflunomide. With this approach, two patients experienced improvement or stabilization of renal function. The remaining two patients progressed to dialysis dependence despite treatment. Plasma BK load < or =5 log copies/mL was associated with graft preservation. Gender, age, delay between transplants, cumulative Thymoglobulin dose, and type of kidney donor were not associated with BK virus infection. Pancreas graft rejection or dysfunction was not observed with the above immunosuppression modification. Mean amylase and lipase > or =6 months following BKVN treatment remained normal. BKVN is an important cause of kidney allograft loss in PAK patients. Screening and early treatment of BKVN may enable preservation of kidney and pancreas grafts.

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy risk in kidney transplants: the influence of recipient age and donor gender

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is a frequent cause of kidney transplant failure. We determined the risk factors for biopsy-proven PVAN among 1027 recent kidney transplant recipients by univariate and multivariate analyses. The rate of PVAN was determined over an univariate and multivariate analysis over an average of 30 months of follow-up of patients receiving predominantly living donor grafts with antibody induction and sequential surveillance biopsies to detect subclinical graft disease. Seventy-four transplant recipients were diagnosed with PVAN with the finding made on surveillance biopsy in 40 patients. These 40 cases did not differ from the 34 non-surveillance cases with respect to baseline clinical characteristics or initial histological features. Older recipient age and female donor gender were independent risks associated with PVAN. Factors not linked to PVAN risk included the use and type of induction agent, use of tacrolimus vs sirolimus, the number of human lympocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches, or the frequency of acute rejection. We conclude that PVAN preferentially affects older age patients and allografts from female donors but is unrelated to immunological risk, choice of immunosuppression, or rejection history.

Polyomavirus nephropathy in native kidneys and renal allografts: an update on an escalating threat

Polyomavirus nephropathy, also termed BK-virus nephropathy (BKN) after the main causative agent, the polyoma-BK-virus strain, is a significant complication after kidney transplantation. BKN is the most common viral infection that affects renal allografts with a prevalence of 1-9% on average 8-13 months post surgery. It can also occur sporadically in native kidneys. Viral nephropathy is caused by the (re)activation of latent BK viruses that enter into a replicative cycle under sustained and intensive immunosuppression. Pure productive kidney infections with JC- and SV-40 polyomaviruses are exceptionally rare. BKN is morphologically defined by the presence of intranuclear viral inclusion bodies in epithelial cells and tubular injury, which is the morphological correlate for renal dysfunction. Renal disease can progress through different histologic stages (from early BKN stage A to late fibrotic stage C) that carry prognostic significance; disease stages B and C often result in chronic kidney (allograft) dysfunction and end-stage renal disease. The clinical goal is to diagnose viral nephropathy in disease stage A and to limit chronic renal injury. Strategies to recognize, classify, and manage BKN are critically discussed including ancillary techniques for risk assessment and patient monitoring: (i) urine cytology and the search for so-called 'decoy cells'; (ii) PCR analyses for viral load measurements in the plasma and urine; and (iii) negative staining urine electron microscopy to identify viral particles.

Infections Complicating Solid Organ Transplantation

The requirements for immune suppression after solid organ transplantation increases the risk of infection with a myriad of organisms. There are many unique and evolving aspects of infection after solid organ transplantation. Advances in immunosuppressive therapy and improved protocols for infection prophylaxis have resulted in changes in the timing and clinical presentation of opportunistic infections. Vigilance in the diagnostic evaluation of suspected infection in the solid organ transplant recipient is essential. This article reviews the basic evaluation and treatment options for many of the infectious conditions peculiar to the immunosuppressed patient.

Low incidence of BK virus nephropathy after simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND

BK virus renal allograft nephropathy (BKVAN) in the setting of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT) has been inadequately studied and reported. We analyzed our data on the incidence of BKVAN and its outcome in SKPT recipients at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) and affiliated centers and report significant differences compared to previous studies.

METHODS

This study used retrospective review and case studies.

RESULTS

A review of 243 consecutive SKPT recipients from January 1, 1996 to December 31, 2004 identified seven cases (three females; ages = 23-54 yrs) of BKVAN following SKPT (incidence = 2.9%). The immunosuppressive protocols during this period were divided into: Period I (pre-August 2001) with no antibody induction and Period II (post-August 2001) with alemtuzumab or antithymocyte globulin induction with steroid avoidance. One BKVAN case was diagnosed in Period II (incidence = 1.4%). Six of seven patients were treated with intravenous cidofovir (0.20-0.50 mg/kg) every two to four weeks over one to six months. Three patients lost the renal allograft 8-22 months following diagnosis of BKVAN, whereas four patients had prolonged allograft survival. Pancreatic function was well preserved in five; one patient lost the pancreatic function due to surgical complications and one has had partial preservation.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a relatively lower incidence of BKVAN among SKPT patients at our center. Although overall graft loss rate was comparable to other series, BKVAN patients had a slightly prolonged graft life. The BKVAN incidence was further reduced in patients receiving modified immunosuppression with antibody preconditioning. The underlying reasons may include less toxic immunosuppressive protocols, earlier diagnosis and the use of antiviral therapy.

Pharmacotherapeutic options for the management of human polyomaviruses

Polyomaviruses [BK virus (BKV), JC virus (JCV) and simian virus 40 (SV40)] have been known to be associated with diseases in humans for over thirty years. BKV-associated nephropathy and JCV-induced progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) were for many years rare diseases occurring only in patients with underlying severe impaired immunity. Over the past decade, the use of more potent immunosuppression (IS) in transplantation, and the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) epidemic, have coincided with a significant increase in the prevalence of these viral complications. Prophylactic and therapeutic interventions for human polyomavirus diseases are limited by our current understanding of polyomaviral pathogenesis. Clinical trials are limited by small numbers of patients affected with clinically significant diseases, lack of defined risk factors and disease definitions, no proven effective treatment and the overall significant morbidity and mortality associated with these diseases. This chapter will focus on a review of the current and future research related to therapeutic targets and interventions for polyomavirus-associated diseases.

Kidney transplant function and histological clearance of virus following diagnosis of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN)

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is managed by reduced immunosuppression with or without antiviral therapy. Data from 55 patients with biopsy-proven PVAN were analyzed for adverse outcomes and influence of baseline variables and interventions. During 20+/-11 months follow-up, the frequencies of graft loss, major and any functional decline were 15%, 24% and 38%, respectively. Repeat biopsies were performed in 45 patients with persistent PVAN in 47%. Low-dose cidofovir, IVIG and cyclosporine conversion were used in 55%, 20% and 55% of patients. No single intervention was associated with improved outcome. Of the variables examined, only degree of interstitial fibrosis at diagnosis was associated with kidney function decline. In contrast, donor source, interstitial fibrosis, proportion of BKV positive tubules and plasma viral load at diagnosis were all associated with failure of histological viral clearance. This retrospective, nonrandomized analysis suggests that: (i) Graft loss within 2 years of PVAN diagnosis is now uncommon, but ongoing functional decline and persistent infection occur frequently. (ii) Low-dose cidofovir, IVIG and conversion to cyclosporine do not abrogate adverse outcomes following diagnosis. (iii) Fibrosis at the time of diagnosis predicts subsequent functional decline. Further elucidation of the natural history of PVAN and its response to individual interventions will require prospective clinical trials.

Recommendations for Outpatient Monitoring of Kidney Transplant Recipients

Clinical and laboratory outpatient monitoring is an important tool in the prevention and management of complications associated with kidney transplantation and immunosuppressive therapy. In the absence of standard protocols for outpatient surveillance of kidney transplant recipients, recommendations for frequency and type of monitoring are determined by the likelihood of problems that are unique to the individual transplant recipient and the particular posttransplantation period. In addition, it is imperative to maintain the transplant recipient's overall health by screening for conditions or diseases that can be linked to prior renal disease, immunosuppressive therapies, and general health maintenance.

Intermediate-dose cidofovir without probenecid in the treatment of BK virus allograft nephropathy

BK virus allograft nephropathy (BKVAN) is a rising complication in kidney transplant recipients. Reducing immunosuppression has been the initial form of therapy in most cases, but is not always associated with improvement in graft function. Anti-viral therapy with low-dose cidofovir (0.25-0.42 mg/kg/dose) has been used successfully in some patients, but dose-related nephrotoxicity has limited its use. We present our experience with 3 kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with BKVAN who received intermediate-dose cidofovir (0.75-1.0 mg/kg/dose) without probenecid, and without concomitant nephrotoxicity. Three female patients, ages 8, 19 and 20 yr, presented with elevated serum creatinine (SCr) values, BK virus stain positive on renal biopsy and high plasma BK viral loads. As a result of viral loads being >2 million copies/ml in two patients and a lack of response to reduction in immunosuppression in the third, we initiated therapy with low-dose cidofovir. Because of persistent positive BK stain and positive plasma viral load, we then administered intermediate-dose cidofovir, without probenecid, for several subsequent doses (seven to 15 infusions till date). All patients tolerated the intermediate-dose cidofovir with no significant rise in SCr during the course of the infusions. The most recent SCr values in all three patients were improved from those at the initial diagnosis of BKVAN. All three patients showed a marked drop in BK viral loads when on intermediate-dose cidofovir, with complete clearing of viremia in two patients. In our experience, intermediate-dose cidofovir without probenecid, used judiciously, is not associated with additional nephrotoxicity and may provide an additional alternative for treatment.

Malignant melanoma in a patient with polyomavirus-BK-associated nephropathy

A possible relationship between malignant melanoma and polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in a renal transplant patient is presented. It is possible that BK polyomavirus (BKV) nephropathy and malignant melanoma developed independently. The coincidence may be related to over-immunosuppression. The presented case suggests careful oncological surveillance in patients with BKV nephropathy.

Immunocytological Urinalysis and Monocyte Chemotactic Peptide-1 in Renal Transplant Recipients With Polyomavirus Replication

In some patients polyomavirus replication induces chronic tubulointerstitial inflammation in the transplanted kidney. The aim of this study was to investigate whether immunocytological urinalysis and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) assays could be used for an early diagnosis of nephropathy for patients with polyomavirus replication. We analyzed 1189 urine sediments from 174 renal allograft recipients who were transplanted between 2000 and 2005. Decoy cells were identified by an immunofluorescence method using specific antibodies (JC/BK monoclonal antibody). A similar method was used to detect CD3(+), CD14(+), and HLA-DR(+) cells with appropriate antibodies. The urinary excretion of MCP-1 was assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The results of urine sediment analysis and MCP-1 concentrations were compared with those of patients with stable graft function (control group n = 65). In 17 patients (10%) decoy cells were identified in urine. In 12 patients polyomavirus DNA was detected in plasma or urine by a polymerase chain reaction method. Polyomavirus nephropathy was diagnosed in eight patients by the presence of intranuclear viral inclusions or immunohistochemical staining with SV40 large T-antigen specimens from a renal biopsy, as well as by clinical and histopathological evidence (group I). Polyomavirus replication was diagnosed in four patients by urinary excretion of decoy cells and polyomavirus DNA detection (group III). In five patients only decoy cells were found. The patients of groups I and II showed an increased number of CD3, CD14, HLA-DR surface antigen-positive cells and greater excretion of MCP-1 compared with the control group (P < .02). The number of excreted cells was higher among patients with more severe infiltration. The results of patients from group III were similar to the control group. In conclusion, increased excretion of cells with CD3, CD14, and HLA-DR surface antigens and of MCP-1 were associated with intragraft tubulointerstitial inflammation in patients with polyomavirus nephropathy. Asymptomatic polyomavirus replication was associated with hidden tubulointerstitial inflammation. Monitoring cell excretion and chemokine content may be utilized for early detection of polyomavirus-induced nephropathy.

Adjuvant low-dose cidofovir therapy for BK polyomavirus interstitial nephritis in renal transplant recipients

BK virus interstitial nephritis (BKVIN) is a serious complication after kidney grafting, necessitating drastic reduction of immunosuppressive therapy in order to enable viral clearance. Despite these measures, progressive graft dysfunction and graft loss occur in the majority of recipients. We diagnosed BKVIN in 21 recipients grafted between 1998 and 2004. Eight of 21 patients were treated with weekly, adjuvant low-dose cidofovir in addition to reduction of immunosuppressive therapy. BKVIN caused irreversible deterioration of graft function in all patients but renal function stabilized after antiviral treatment (creatinine clearance: 51.8-32 mL/min; p=0.001) and no graft loss occurred in cidofovir-treated recipients during 24.8 (8-41) months follow-up. Peak serum cidofovir concentrations were dose-dependent and attained approximately one-tenth of thein vitroEC50 for cidofovir against BK-virus, while pre-treatment with probenecid did not alter peak serum concentrations nor affected the incidence of nephrotoxicity. In fact, no cidofovir-related renal toxicity occurred; few patients had minor transient side effects (nausea, skin rash). In contrast, 9 of 13 patient who received no adjuvant cidofovir therapy lost their graft after median 8 (4-40) months. In this selected group of recipients with BKVIN, the use of adjuvant low-dose cidofovir therapy resulted in prolonged graft survival and stabilized graft function.

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in renal transplantation: interdisciplinary analyses and recommendations

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is an emerging cause of kidney transplant failure affecting 1-10% of patients. As uncertainty exists regarding risk factors, diagnosis, and intervention, an independent panel of experts reviewed the currently available evidence and prepared this report. Most cases of PVAN are elicited by BK virus (BKV) in the context of intense immunosuppression. No specific immunosuppressive drug is exclusively associated with PVAN, but most cases reported to date arise while the patient is on triple immunosuppressive combinations, often comprising tacrolimus and/or mycophenolate mofetil plus corticosteroids. Immunologic control of polyomavirus replication can be achieved by reducing, switching, and/or discontinuing components of the immunosuppressive regimen, but the individual's risk of rejection should be considered. The success rate of this intervention is increased with earlier diagnosis. Therefore, it is recommended that all renal transplant recipients should be screened for BKV replication in the urine: 1) every three months during the first two years posttransplant; 2) when allograft dysfunction is noted; and 3) when allograft biopsy is performed. A positive screening result should be confirmed in <4 weeks and assessed by quantitative assays (e.g. BKV DNA or RNA load in plasma or urine). Definitive diagnosis of PVAN requires allograft biopsy. If PVAN and concurrent acute rejection is diagnosed, antirejection treatment should be considered, coupled with subsequently reducing immunosuppression. The antiviral cidofovir is not approved for PVAN, but investigational use at low doses (0.25-0.33 mg/kg intravenously biweekly) without probenicid should be considered for refractory cases. Retransplantation after renal allograft loss to PVAN remains a treatment option for patients clearing polyomavirus replication.