Porcine CD80: cloning, characterization, and evidence for its role in direct human T-cell activation

Membrane markers of the immune cells in swine: an update

Besides their breeding value, swine are increasingly used as biomedical models. As reported in three international swine clusters of differentiation (CD) workshops and in the animal homologue section of the last workshop for the determination of human leukocyte differentiation antigens (HLDA 8), characterisation of leukocyte surface antigens by monoclonal antibodies and other molecular studies have determined the cell lineages and blood leukocyte subsets implicated in the immune response, including cell adhesion molecules involved in cell trafficking. This review focusses on the current state of knowledge of porcine leukocyte differentiation and major histocompatibility complex (SLA) molecules. Examples of porcine particularities such as the double-positive T lymphocytes with the phenotype CD(4+)CD8(low) and CD(4-)CD8(low) alphabeta T cell subsets and the persistence of SLA class II after T-lymphocyte activation are illustrated, as well as the shared characteristics of the Artiodactyla group, such as the high proportion of gammadelta TcR (T cell receptor) T cells in blood and other lymphoid tissues. Furthermore, discrepancies between swine and humans, such as CD16 expression on dendritic cells and CD11b (wCD11R1) tissue distribution are outlined. The rapidly growing information should facilitate manipulation of the swine immune system towards improving disease control, and open new avenues for biomedical research using the pig as a model.

T-cell responses during pig-to-primate xenotransplantation

Xenotransplantation using porcine organs may resolve a chronic shortage of donor organs for clinical transplantation if significant immunological barriers can be overcome. To determine the potential role of T lymphocytes in Xenograft (Xg) rejection, we transplanted transgenic hCD46 porcine hearts heterotopically into baboon recipients.

METHODS

Recipients were treated to deplete anti-Gal antibody with a non-antigenic alpha-Gal polyethylene glycol polymer (TPC) (n = 2), TPC plus rituximab (anti-CD20) (n = 1) or were untreated (n = 1). None of the recipients received T-cell immunosuppression.

RESULTS

All Xgs failed within 7 days and showed evidence of a mixed humoral and cellular rejection process. Cellular infiltration consisting primarily of CD4+ T cells and few CD8+ T cells. Proliferation and cytotoxicity assays showed sensitization of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that reacted with porcine IFN-gamma (pIFN-gamma)-stimulated porcine aortic endothelial cells (PAEC). The CD4+ lymphocytes displayed greater cytotoxicity than CD8+ cells. An increased frequency of PAEC-specific interleukin (IL) 2 and IFN-gamma-secreting T cells was observed, suggesting a Th1 cytokine bias. An increase in the percentage of circulating CD4+CD28- cells was observed at the time of rejection and over 50% of the CD4+ cells recovered from residual pig tissue at necropsy lacked CD28 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings show that lymphocytes are efficiently stimulated by PAEC antigens and can mediate direct tissue destruction. These studies (1) provide an insight into the potential of cellular-mediated cardiac Xg rejection, (2) show for the first time the induction of cytotoxic pig-specific CD4+CD28- lymphocytes and (3) provide a rational basis for determining different modes of immunosuppression to treat Xg rejection.

Molecular cloning, expression and functional characterization of miniature swine CD86

CD86 is one of the key molecules involved in the co-stimulation of T cells. The complete cDNA encoding CD86 molecule of miniature swine was cloned and analyzed. A comparison of two CD86 amino acid sequences of miniature swine and domestic swine showed only three amino acid differences suggesting that it is unlikely to affect the major structural features of the miniature swine CD86 (msCD86). In the expression study, constitutive expression of CD86 mRNA was detected in various tissues, and the aberrant expression of the transcriptional variant (putative soluble form) was noted. The cDNA and amino acid sequences for this variant were determined and compared with those for the human soluble CD86, which was previously reported to co-stimulate the T cells. Interestingly, an alignment of the two sequences revealed that 51 amino acids corresponding to the sequence for the boundary of the extracellular and intracellular domains including the transmembrane domain are deleted at almost an identical location within the full form of CD86 from both species. This suggests the possibility of a co-stimulatory function of the putative soluble msCD86. In order to determine if the cloned msCD86 molecules has co-stimulatory activity, the proliferative responses of the human CD4(+) T cells to the msCD86-transfected COS cells were measured in the presence of Con A. The results revealed that CD86/COS, but not the mock/COS, efficiently co-stimulated the proliferation of the Con A-stimulated CD4(+) T cells and this co-stimulatory effect was blocked by CTLA4-Ig. The structural and functional information on the miniature swine CD86 from this study will enable a further genetic manipulation of CD86 as a therapeutic strategy for controlling the xenogeneic T cell immune responses mediated by the CD86-CD28 signal pathway.