Familial retinoblastoma: where and when?

Likelihood of germline mutation with solitary retinoblastoma based on tumour location at presentation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To evaluate the likelihood of germline mutation in patients presenting with solitary retinoblastoma based on tumour location at first examination.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of solitary unilateral retinoblastoma for likelihood of germline mutation (family history of retinoblastoma and/or genetic testing indicating germline RB1 mutation and/or development of additional new or bilateral tumours) based on tumur location at presentation (macular vs extramacular).

RESULTS

Of 480 consecutive patients with solitary retinoblastoma, 85 were in the macula (18%) and 395 were extramacular (82%). By comparison (macular vs extramacular tumours), macular tumours had smaller basal diameter (12.7 mm vs 18.9 mm, p<0.001) and smaller tumour thickness (6.1 mm vs 10.7 mm, p<0.001). Patients with macular tumours demonstrated greater likelihood for germline mutation (23% vs 12%, OR=2.18, p=0.011), specifically based on family history of retinoblastoma (13% vs 2%, OR=4.64, p=0.004), genetic testing showing germline RB1 mutation (27% vs 15%, OR=2.04 (95% CI 1.04 to 4.01), p=0.039), development of new tumours (13% vs 3%, OR=5.16 (95% CI 2.06 to 12.87), p=0.001) and/or development of bilateral disease (9% vs 2%, OR=4.98 (95% CI 1.70 to 14.65), p=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with solitary unilateral retinoblastoma, those presenting with macular tumour (compared with extramacular tumour) show 2.18 times greater likelihood for germline mutation and an even higher likelihood of development of subsequent tumours. Solitary macular retinoblastoma should raise an index of suspicion for likely germline mutation and multifocal disease.

At What Age Could Screening for Familial Retinoblastoma Be Discontinued? A Systematic Review

The aim of this systematic review is to assess the latest age at diagnosis for detection of familial retinoblastoma in order to evaluate at what age screening of at-risk children could be discontinued. Extended screening beyond this age would result in unnecessary patient burden and costs. However, discontinuing screening prematurely would have the adverse effect of missing tumors. We performed a literature search (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library) up until February of 2021 and systematically included studies where patients had a family history of retinoblastoma, a known age at diagnosis, and who were ophthalmologically screened for retinoblastoma from birth. A total of 176 familial retinoblastoma patients from 17 studies were included in this review. Based on 48 months of age being the latest age of diagnosis, ophthalmological screening for familial retinoblastoma could safely be discontinued at age four years.

Retinoblastoma and Neuroblastoma Predisposition and Surveillance

Retinoblastoma (RB) is the most common intraocular malignancy in childhood. Approximately 40% of retinoblastomas are hereditary and due to germline mutations in the RB1 gene. Children with hereditary RB are also at risk for developing a midline intracranial tumor, most commonly pineoblastoma. We recommend intensive ocular screening for patients with germline RB1 mutations for retinoblastoma as well as neuroimaging for pineoblastoma surveillance. There is an approximately 20% risk of developing second primary cancers among individuals with hereditary RB, higher among those who received radiotherapy for their primary RB tumors. However, there is not yet a clear consensus on what, if any, screening protocol would be most appropriate and effective. Neuroblastoma (NB), an embryonal tumor of the sympathetic nervous system, accounts for 15% of pediatric cancer deaths. Prior studies suggest that about 2% of patients with NB have an underlying genetic predisposition that may have contributed to the development of NB. Germline mutations in ALK and PHOX2B account for most familial NB cases. However, other cancer predisposition syndromes, such as Li-Fraumeni syndrome, RASopathies, and others, may be associated with an increased risk for NB. No established protocols for NB surveillance currently exist. Here, we describe consensus recommendations on hereditary RB and NB from the AACR Childhood Cancer Predisposition Workshop. Clin Cancer Res; 23(13); e98-e106. ©2017 AACRSee all articles in the online-only CCR Pediatric Oncology Series.

Spatiotemporal Patterns of Tumor Occurrence in Children with Intraocular Retinoblastoma

PURPOSE

To accurately map the retinal area covered by tumor in a prospectively enrolled cohort of children diagnosed with retinoblastoma.

METHODS

Orbital MRI in 106 consecutive retinoblastoma patients (44 bilateral) was analyzed. For MRI-visible tumors, the polar angle and angle of eccentricity of points defining tumor perimeter on the retina were determined by triangulation from images in three orthogonal planes. The centroid of the mapped area was calculated to approximate tumor origin, and the location and cumulative tumor burden were analyzed in relation to mutation type (germline vs. somatic), tumor area, and patient age at diagnosis. Location of small tumors undetected by MRI was approximated with fundoscopic images.

RESULTS

Mapping was successful for 129 tumors in 91 eyes from 67 patients (39 bilateral, 43 germline mutation). Cumulative tumor burden was highest within the macula and posterior pole and was asymmetrically higher within the inferonasal periphery. Tumor incidence was lowest in the superotemporal periphery. Tumor location varied with age at diagnosis in a complex pattern. Tumor location was concentrated in the macula and superonasal periphery in patients <5.6 months, in the inferotemporal quadrant of the posterior pole in patients 5.6-8.8 months, in the inferonasal quadrant in patients 8.8-13.2 months, and in the nasal and superotemporal periphery in patients >13.2 months. The distribution of MRI-invisible tumors was consistent with the asymmetry of mapped tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI-based mapping revealed a previously unrecognized pattern of retinoblastoma localization that evolves with age at diagnosis. The structured spatiotemporal distribution of tumors may provide valuable clues about cellular or molecular events associated with tumorigenesis in the developing retina.

Ophthalmic artery chemosurgery for retinoblastoma prevents new intraocular tumors

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence and timing of new intraocular tumor foci in genetic retinoblastoma cases after treatment with ophthalmic artery chemosurgery (OAC).

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective review of all genetic retinoblastoma cases managed at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center/Weil-Cornell Medical School since May 2006.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-one patients (80 with bilateral disease and 1 with unilateral disease with a family history) with genetic retinoblastoma, with a total of 116 eyes treated with OAC since May 2006.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-institution review of patients with bilateral retinoblastoma and unilateral retinoblastoma with a positive family history. New tumors were assessed by clinical notes, retinal drawings, and RetCam digital imaging (Clarity Medical Systems, Pleasanton, CA).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

New intraocular retinoblastoma tumors after treatment with OAC.

RESULTS

Forty-one eyes were treated primarily with OAC (treatment-naïve group) and 75 eyes were treated with OAC after prior treatment with systemic chemotherapy, external beam radiation, or both and focal techniques. Of the 41 treatment-naïve eyes, a new intraocular tumor (one focus) subsequently developed in 1 eye. Of the 75 previously treated eyes, new tumors (single focus in each eye) subsequently developed in 6 eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Eyes receiving OAC demonstrate fewer new intraocular retinoblastomas after radiation or systemic chemotherapy than has been reported in the literature. This suggests that ophthalmoscopically undetectable tumors are present at the initial diagnosis and effectively are eliminated as a result of OAC.

A novel translocation t(11;13) (q21;q14.2) in a child with suprasellar primitive neuroectodermal tumor and retinoblastoma

PURPOSE

To report on a novel translocation related to a suprasellar primitive neuroectodermal tumor (sPNET) and retinoblastoma.

DESIGN

Case report.

METHODS

A 6-year-old girl underwent genetic testing after developing unilateral retinoblastoma subsequent to treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, and stem-cell rescue) for a sPNET found at 1 year of age.

RESULTS

Genetic testing found the girl's karyotype to be 46,XX,t(11;13)(q21;q14.2); a novel translocation not previously reported in patients with either retinoblastoma or sPNET.

CONCLUSIONS

Our patient had a novel translocation affecting the retinoblastoma 1 (RB1) gene, 46,XX,t(11;13)(q21;q14.2) resulting in the late development of unilateral retinoblastoma. Although she only developed unilateral retinoblastoma, her central nervous system was affected at a very early age. How her complex mutation resulted in retinoblastoma and antecedent sPNET remains unknown.

Familial retinoblastoma: fundus screening schedule impact and guideline proposal. A retrospective study

AIMS

To assess if systematic fundus screening according to an 'intensive' schedule alters ocular outcome and to propose fundus screening schedule guidelines for children related to a retinoblastoma patient.

METHODS

For children with a positive family history of retinoblastoma, we perform fundus exams shortly after birth under general anaesthesia and then at regular intervals according to schedules based on the risk. Familial retinoblastoma cases seen at our institution from January 1995 to December 2004 were retrospectively classified as 'screened' or 'non-screened' (NS) and, among the 'screened' patients, as 'intensively screened' (IS) if screening matched our recommendations or 'non-intensively screened' (S). Groups were compared by Fisher exact test for categorical variables and Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables.

RESULTS

Among the 547 retinoblastoma patients managed at our institution during this period, 59 were familial cases. In all, 20 were in the NS group, 23 in the S group, and 16 in the IS group. The number of children enucleated was, respectively, 13, 2, and 0 (P<10(-4)); external beam radiation (EBRT) was required for, respectively, 6, 0, and 2 children (P<0.009). Chemotherapy burden and visual acuity were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

An 'intensive' fundus screening schedule decreased the need for enucleation and EBRT. Therefore, despite the heavy burden of the screening schedule, we recommend physicians and health-care professionals to better inform and refer children with a family history of retinoblastoma for genetic counselling and proper fundus screening in specialized centres.

Axenfeld-Rieger ocular anomaly and retinoblastoma caused by constitutional chromosome 13q deletion

Axenfeld-Rieger (AR) ocular anomaly might be due to deletions of different chromosomes. No association between AR, mental retardation, and retinoblastoma has been described. We report a 2-month-old female with general development delay and dysmorphic features. AR anomaly was detected, and a retinoblastoma (RB) was diagnosed in a very early stage. De novo 13q deletion was identified. Systemic chemotherapy, focal cryotherapy, transpupillary thermotherapy, brachytherapy, and intra-arterial chemotherapy were needed to control the RB. This is the first report of an association of AR, 13q deletion, and retinoblastoma, to be disclosed in patients born with such ocular and dysmorphic features.

Familial retinoblastoma in developing countries

BACKGROUND

Although screening for familial retinoblastoma has been shown to be beneficial we suspected that such screening programs may be less than optimal in developing countries (DC).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study comparing patients with familial retinoblastoma from five centers in DC (Argentina, Brazil, Turkey, Jordan, and Venezuela) versus a reference center in the USA.

RESULTS

Ninety-two (32 from the USA and 60 from DC) patients were included. Forty-one (44.6%) patients avoided enucleation, 42 (45.7%) had 1 eye removed, and 9 (9.8%) underwent bilateral enucleation. Eleven (11.9%) had major pathology risk factors at enucleation. There were no cases of metastatic disease at diagnosis. Detection via screening was significantly less common in DC than in the USA (23.3% vs. 71.8%, P < 0.0001). Patients in DC were diagnosed at a significantly later age and with more advanced intraocular disease that led to increased risk of bilateral enucleation. Patients detected by screening in DC were significantly younger at diagnosis, had less advanced intraocular disease, better ocular preservation rates and survival results than those whose retinoblastoma was not detected via early screening. Five-year pEFS was 0.92 for the patients treated in the USA and 0.81 for the patients in DC (P = 0.42). Seven events occurred (extraocular relapse four in patients from DC and second malignancies in three).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with familial retinoblastoma are less likely to be diagnosed by screening in DC and had higher morbidity and mortality caused by recurrent extraocular retinoblastoma.

Stage of presentation and visual outcome of patients screened for familial retinoblastoma: nationwide registration in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

In the Netherlands a comprehensive programme for screening just after birth for familial retinoblastoma is taking place. In this report the stage of the disease at the time of detection, by way of screening, and the long term visual outcome in these patients was evaluated.

METHODS

A nationwide, retrospective study. From January 1992-July 2004, patients at risk for familial retinoblastoma were screened 1-2 weeks after birth, and investigated for laterality, Reese-Ellsworth classification/International Classification of Retinoblastoma, macular involvement, age of primary retinoblastoma, initial therapy, and visual outcome.

RESULTS

17 patients were diagnosed with familial retinoblastoma. 88.3% developed bilateral, 11.7% unilateral retinoblastoma. Of the 34 eyes, 56% were R-E group I, 16% were group II A-B, 16% were group III A-B, 9% were group IV, 3% were group V. Using the International Classification of Retinoblastoma, 72% were group A, 19% were group B, 6% were group C, 3% were group E. The visual outcome revealed 73.5% of eyes with 20/20-20/40, 26.5% eyes with < or = 20/100-no light perception; 5.9% of eyes were enucleated, all other eyes were treated with local or conservative treatment methods. Of all eyes, 59% had extramacular retinoblastoma, 98% of patients had at least one eye with extramacular retinoblastoma.

CONCLUSION

Most familial retinoblastoma patients present as a R-E group I or group A when screened within 2 weeks after birth. Nearly 90% of patients had a long term visual acuity of 20/20-20/40. Despite the common occurrence of macula involvement, bilateral macula involvement was infrequent, and since most eyes were salvaged, good vision was obtained in the majority of patients.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for retinoblastoma: the first reported liveborn

PURPOSE

To develop an accurate mutation analysis procedure for retinoblastoma gene (RB1) mutation, which is sensitive at the single-cell level, and to use in vitro fertilization (IVF) and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to achieve pregnancies without retinoblastoma.

DESIGN

Case report.

METHODS

Twelve day 3 embryos, obtained by IVF with intracytoplasmic sperm injection, underwent single-cell DNA testing via polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis to detect the presence of a paternal RB1 mutation. Embryos were diagnosed as being unaffected and were transferred to the uterus on day 5.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Achieving a healthy pregnancy and delivery, assessed by clinical presentation, fundus photography, and RB1 molecular analysis.

RESULTS

A singleton pregnancy was achieved, and a child without retinoblastoma was born. The absence of the paternal RB1 mutation was confirmed on a sample of peripheral blood from the newborn.

CONCLUSIONS

We are first to report a successful human liveborn, delivered after IVF with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for retinoblastoma. The successful result indicates that preimplantation genetic diagnosis exists for this genetic disease and may represent a viable alternative to prenatal diagnosis with the subsequent option of terminating an affected pregnancy.

Screening for retinoblastoma: presenting signs as prognosticators of patient and ocular survival

OBJECTIVE

To correlate 3 common presenting signs of retinoblastoma with patient and ocular survival and to assess the efficacy of current pediatric screening practices for retinoblastoma.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted of 1831 retinoblastoma patients from our center (1914-June 2000). Patient survival (excluding deaths from other primary neoplasms) and ocular survival (presenting eyes) rates were calculated and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Leukocoria correlated with excellent patient survival (>86%, 5 years) but poor ocular survival in unilateral (4%, 5 years) and bilateral patients (29%, 5 years). A total of 308 (19%) of 1654 patients presented with strabismus: patient survival was excellent (90%, 5 years), and ocular survival was poor (17%, 5 years) yet better than leukocoria. Patients who had a family history of retinoblastoma and were clinically screened for retinal tumors from birth were diagnosed younger (8 months of age) and earlier (Reese Ellsworth group 1 = 26 [58%] of 45) and had better ocular survival than nonscreened patients with a family history. More patients were initially detected by family/friends (1315 [80%] of 1632) than pediatricians (123 [8%] of 1632) or ophthalmologists (156 [10%] of 1632).

CONCLUSION

Most US children whose retinoblastoma is diagnosed initially present with leukocoria detected by a parent, despite routine pediatric screening for leukocoria via the red reflex test. Initial disease detection at the point of leukocoria or strabismus correlated with high patient survival rates and poor ocular survival rates for the presenting eye. Saving eyes and vision requires disease recognition before leukocoria, as demonstrated by the better ocular salvage rate among patients who had a positive family history and received clinical surveillance via early, routine dilated funduscopic examinations by an ophthalmologist.

New retinoblastoma tumor formation in children initially treated with systemic carboplatin

PURPOSE

To determine the frequency and timing of new intraocular tumor formation in children with hereditary retinoblastoma initially treated with systemic carboplatin.

DESIGN

Retrospective, noncomparative case series.

PARTICIPANTS

This study included 34 children (57 eyes) with hereditary bilateral retinoblastoma initially treated with systemic carboplatin at the Robert M. Ellsworth Ophthalmic Oncology Center at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital from 1994 through 2000.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

New tumor formation after initial treatment with systemic carboplatin.

RESULTS

There were a total of 165 tumors in 57 eyes. There were 63 new tumors in 27 eyes (47%) after administration of systemic carboplatin, for a mean of 1.1 new tumors per eye. The mean patient age at time of new tumor presentation was 9 months, with 57% of new tumors developing within 4 months of carboplatin treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that children who were treated when younger than 6 months of age were more likely to have new tumors (60%) compared with those treated after 6 months of age (31%; P = 0.0182).

CONCLUSIONS

New intraocular tumors continue to develop after systemic carboplatin; most new tumors appeared within 4 months of treatment.

At what age could screening for familial retinoblastoma be stopped? A register based study 1945-98

AIM

To evaluate until what age children in families with retinoblastoma should be screened.

METHODS

A register based cohort (n= 685) study of Dutch retinoblastoma patients (1945-1998). The records of all familial hereditary retinoblastoma patients from 1945 were reviewed and the age at diagnosis and either they were screened from birth determined.

RESULTS

75 patients had the familial hereditary form of retinoblastoma. The mean age at diagnosis in patients with fundus screening (n=50) from birth on was 4.9 months (median 1.9 months; range 1 day to 48 months). Thus, 4 years was the latest onset of familial retinoblastoma properly evaluated from birth. This mean age was significantly different (p<0.0001) from the mean age at diagnosis in patients without fundus screening (n=25) from birth (mean 17.2 months; median 10.0 months; range 1.5-63.0 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Ophthalmological screening of children and sibs at risk for familial hereditary retinoblastoma is recommended until the age of 4 years in order to detect retinoblastoma as early as possible.

Chemoreduction and local ophthalmic therapy for intraocular retinoblastoma

PURPOSE

To study the effectiveness of combined systemic chemotherapy and local ophthalmic therapy for retinoblastoma with the goal of avoiding enucleation and external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, nonrandomized, single-arm clinical trial. Seventy-five eyes were followed in 47 children. Patients were treated with a six-cycle protocol of vincristine, etoposide, and carboplatin. Most (83%) also received ophthalmic treatment (cryotherapy, laser photocoagulation, thermotherapy, or plaque radiation therapy) during and/or after the chemotherapy.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 13 months, event-free survival was 74%, with an event defined as enucleation and/or EBRT. Six children required EBRT in seven eyes (9%); five required enucleation of one eye (7%); five required a combination of EBRT and enucleation in six eyes (8%). Reese-Ellsworth groups 1, 2, and 3 eyes had excellent results, with avoidance of EBRT or enucleation in all 39. Treatment of groups 4 and 5 was less successful, with 33% of six eyes and 53% of 30 eyes, respectively, requiring EBRT and/or enucleation. Toxicities from chemotherapy were mild and included cytopenias (89%), fever and neutropenia (28%), infection (9%), and gastrointestinal symptoms, dehydration, and vincristine neurotoxicity (40%). No patients developed a second malignancy, metastatic disease, renal disease, or ototoxicity.

CONCLUSION

In retinoblastoma patients with Reese-Ellsworth eye groups 1, 2, or 3, systemic chemotherapy used with local ophthalmic therapies can eliminate the need for enucleation or EBRT without significant systemic toxicity. More effective therapy is required for Reese-Ellsworth eye groups 4 and 5.