Lesions of the pontine parabrachial nuclei eliminate successive negative contrast effects in rats

Altered reward sensitivity to sucrose outcomes prior to drug exposure in alcohol preferring rats

Addiction involves key impairments in reward sensitivity (RS). The current study explored impaired RS to natural reward as a predisposing factor to addictive-like behavior. Alcohol preferring (P) rats are selectively bred based on significantly greater ethanol consumption and preference and offer the ability to inspect differences in subjects with a positive family history of addictive-like behavior. P rat's RS was compared to RS in the well-used Sprague-Dawley (SD) strain. To assess RS in a novel manner, instrumental incentive contrast, discrimination and consumption of sucrose solution were examined. Animals performed in a free operant situation for different sucrose concentration solutions using a block of 'mixed' trials with alternating outcome concentrations (e.g., 5 and 10 % sucrose) to change outcome value in a predictable manner. Animals also performed for reward in blocks of single outcome trials (5 or 10 or 20 or 40 % sucrose daily exposure) surrounding the mixed block. RS (e.g., reward discrimination and contrast effects between and within-sessions) was measured by changes in trials completed, instrumental response latency and consumption. P rats expressed an altered profile of RS with a greater tendency toward equivalent responding to different outcomes within the same session and an absence of incentive contrast from diverse reward comparisons. In contrast, SD animals expressed within-session reward discrimination and a subset of incentive contrast effects. These effects were moderated by food deprivation more consistently in SD compared to P rats. P rat alterations in processing natural rewards could predispose them to addictive-like behaviors including greater alcohol consumption and preference.

The Functional and Neurobiological Properties of Bad Taste

The gustatory system serves as a critical line of defense against ingesting harmful substances. Technological advances have fostered the characterization of peripheral receptors and have created opportunities for more selective manipulations of the nervous system, yet the neurobiological mechanisms underlying taste-based avoidance and aversion remain poorly understood. One conceptual obstacle stems from a lack of recognition that taste signals subserve several behavioral and physiological functions which likely engage partially segregated neural circuits. Moreover, although the gustatory system evolved to respond expediently to broad classes of biologically relevant chemicals, innate repertoires are often not in register with the actual consequences of a food. The mammalian brain exhibits tremendous flexibility; responses to taste can be modified in a specific manner according to bodily needs and the learned consequences of ingestion. Therefore, experimental strategies that distinguish between the functional properties of various taste-guided behaviors and link them to specific neural circuits need to be applied. Given the close relationship between the gustatory and visceroceptive systems, a full reckoning of the neural architecture of bad taste requires an understanding of how these respective sensory signals are integrated in the brain.

Behavioral analyses of taste function and ingestion in rodent models

In 1975, at the start of my junior year in college, I took a course on experimental methods in psychology from Dr. James C. Smith, when he was a Visiting Professor at Penn State University. That experience set me on the professional path of studying the neural bases of taste function and ingestion on which I remain to this day. Along the way, I did my graduate work at Florida State University under the tutelage of Jim, I did my postdoctoral training at the University of Pennsylvania under the supervision of Harvey Grill, and I also worked closely with Ralph Norgren, who was at the Penn State Medical College. This article briefly summarizes some of the lessons I learned from my mentors and highlights a few key research findings arising from my privilege of working with gifted students and postdocs. After close to 40 years of being a student of the gustatory system and ingestive behavior, it is still with the greatest conviction that I believe rigorous analysis of behavior is indispensable to any effort seeking to understand brain function.

Relative reward effects on operant behavior: Incentive contrast, induction and variety effects

Comparing different rewards automatically produces dynamic relative outcome effects on behavior. Each new outcome exposure is to an updated version evaluated relative to alternatives. Relative reward effects include incentive contrast, positive induction and variety effects. The present study utilized a novel behavioral design to examine relative reward effects on a chain of operant behavior using auditory cues. Incentive contrast is the most often examined effect and focuses on increases or decreases in behavioral performance after value upshifts (positive) or downshifts (negative) relative to another outcome. We examined the impact of comparing two reward outcomes in a repeated measures design with three sessions: a single outcome and a mixed outcome and a final single outcome session. Relative reward effects should be apparent when comparing trials for the identical outcome between the single and mixed session types. An auditory cue triggered a series of operant responses (nosepoke-leverpress-food retrieval), and we measured possible contrast effects for different reward magnitude combinations. We found positive contrast for trials with the greatest magnitude differential but positive induction or variety effects in other combinations. This behavioral task could be useful for analyzing environmental or neurobiological factors involved in reward comparisons, decision-making and choice during instrumental, goal-directed action.

Neural substrates of psychostimulant withdrawal-induced anhedonia

Psychostimulant drugs have powerful reinforcing and hedonic properties and are frequently abused. Cessation of psychostimulant administration results in a withdrawal syndrome characterized by anhedonia (i.e., an inability to experience pleasure). In humans, psychostimulant withdrawal-induced anhedonia can be debilitating and has been hypothesized to play an important role in relapse to drug use. Hence, understanding the neural substrates involved in psychostimulant withdrawal-induced anhedonia is essential. In this review, we first summarize the theoretical perspectives of psychostimulant withdrawal-induced anhedonia. Experimental procedures and measures used to assess anhedonia in experimental animals are also discussed. The review then focuses on neural substrates hypothesized to play an important role in anhedonia experienced after termination of psychostimulant administration, such as with cocaine, amphetamine-like drugs, and nicotine. Both neural substrates that have been extensively investigated and some that need further evaluation with respect to psychostimulant withdrawal-induced anhedonia are reviewed. In the context of reviewing the various neurosubstrates of psychostimulant withdrawal, we also discuss pharmacological medications that have been used to treat psychostimulant withdrawal in humans. This literature review indicates that great progress has been made in understanding the neural substrates of anhedonia associated with psychostimulant withdrawal. These advances in our understanding of the neurobiology of anhedonia may also shed light on the neurobiology of nondrug-induced anhedonia, such as that seen as a core symptom of depression and a negative symptom of schizophrenia.

Involvement of mesolimbic structures in short-term sodium depletion: in situ hybridization and ligand-binding analyses

Acute treatment with the diuretic furosemide (Lasix) produces a reduction in plasma Na(+) and volume as well as increased thirst and salt appetite. The resulting hypovolemia stimulates the well-known counter-regulatory physiological response from the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. However, the neurochemical players underpinning the behavioral responses of thirst and salt appetite are less clear. Previously, we have reported that salt-replete deoxycorticosterone (DOCA) treatment activates mesolimbic structures associated with reward and goal-seeking behavior. The present study was designed to test whether the same brain regions are affected in a salt-depleted state. In experiment 1, two groups of adult male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were injected with Lasix (10 mg/rat, s.c.) and 18 h later were allowed access either to 2% NaCl solution ('Lasix+salt') or only to tap water ('Lasixnosalt') for 2 h. For comparison purposes, a third group received an isotonic saline injection instead of Lasix and was allowed access to the 2% salt solution (Vehicle). All groups were permitted 24 h access to tap water. We found no differences in dynorphin-mRNA levels in any striatal and accumbal regions among any of the treatment groups. However, as found previously in DOCA-treated rats, there were increased enkephalin (ENK)-mRNA and decreased dopamine transporter (DAT) binding levels throughout the striatum in Lasix+salt and decreased ENK-mRNA in Lasixnosalt rats versus Vehicle. In experiment 2, the involvement of the ENKergic and/or dopaminergic system was tested in rats divided into the same three groups described in experiment 1. However, before access to salt or water, the Lasix+salt and the vehicle groups were administered either a delta-opioid, naltrindole or a dopamine D(2) antagonist, raclopride. Only the naltrindole-treated rats showed a blunted intake of salt solution. Thus, these findings along with our neurochemical results suggest that mesolimbic enkephalin might impact salt intake through dopaminergic systems.

Differential effects of diazepam infused into the amygdala and hippocampus on negative contrast

Behavioral suppression is observed when animals shift from a high to a lower magnitude of reward in comparison to animals that continuously receive the lower magnitude reward. As previously reported, systemic administration of benzodiazepines promotes recovery from this negative contrast. This study aimed to assess where the neural substrate(s) located in the limbic areas for diazepam to induce such recovery effects on negative contrast. With food-deprived rats, the negative contrast procedure was conducted by comparing a group consuming a 32% sucrose solution which was shifted to 4% with a group consuming only 4% sucrose throughout the experiment. Represented mainly by a decreased number of licks, the negative contrast effects were clearly shown in the control groups receiving the vehicle. Systemic injection of diazepam dose-dependently reduced this contrast. Further, this negative contrast effect was significantly attenuated by local infusion of diazepam (30 microg) into the amygdala, but no such effect was confirmed when diazepam was infused into the hippocampus. Together, the present study shows that a reliable anti-contrast effect can be induced by diazepam administration peripherally or locally infused into the amygdala. These data indicate that the amygdala is involved in the recovery effects of benzodiazepines on consummatory negative contrast.

Increased successive negative contrast in rats withdrawn from an escalating-dose schedule of D-amphetamine

The exposure of humans and animals to high doses of psychostimulant drugs, followed by their withdrawal, leads to a number of aversive psychological symptoms. These symptoms include increased anxiety and anhedonia, and may be manifested behaviorally as a decreased interest in normally rewarding stimuli. In the present study, we determine the effects of withdrawal from an escalating-dose schedule of D-amphetamine on the consumption of a 4% sucrose solution under normal conditions, and after an incentive downshift. The downshift was induced by subjecting animals to a consumatory negative contrast paradigm, by switching them from a familiar 32% sucrose solution to a novel 4% solution. In unshifted animals, there was no effect of D-amphetamine withdrawal on consumption of the 4% solution. In contrast, drug-withdrawn animals displayed an exaggerated negative contrast effect, primarily reflected as a delayed recovery from the downshift lasting for at least 60 h. This effect is interpreted as a consequence of the increased emotionality of withdrawn animals, and may be related to disruption of normal search behaviors.

Parabrachial nucleus lesions block taste and attenuate flavor preference and aversion conditioning in rats

Rats with ibotenic acid lesions of the parabrachial nucleus (PBN) failed to learn a taste aversion induced by lithium chloride (LiCl) toxicosis. The same rats also did not learn to prefer a taste that was paired with intragastric (IG) carbohydrate infusions during 22 hr/day trials. The PBN-lesioned rats did learn to prefer a flavor (odor + taste) paired with the IG carbohydrate infusions over a different flavor paired with IG water. The PBN-lesioned rats also learned to avoid a flavor paired with IG LiCl infusions during 22 hr/day trials. The flavor preference and aversion, however, were less pronounced than those displayed by control rats. These data indicate that the PBN is essential for forming orosensory-viscerosensory associations when taste is the primary cue but is less critical when more complex flavor cues are available.

The hedonic impact and intake of food are increased by midazolam microinjection in the parabrachial nucleus

Benzodiazepines have been reported to induce eating when administered into the brainstem of rats (either the fourth ventricle or the parabrachial nucleus). Benzodiazepines in the brainstem also have been reported to enhance the hedonic impact of taste, as measured by hedonic/aversive taste reactivity patterns, when administered to the fourth ventricle. The present study examined whether the parabrachial nucleus in particular is a brainstem site of the benzodiazepine-produced enhancement of eating and palatability. Food intake (cereal mash) was measured after brainstem microinjections of midazolam or vehicle (0.0, 7.5, and 15.0 microg) into the parabrachial nucleus, the nucleus of the solitary tract, the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus, or the fourth ventricle (60 microg). We used the taste reactivity paradigm to measure hedonic/aversive affective reactions elicited from rats by oral infusions of a bittersweet solution (7% sucrose-0.01% quinine). Positive hedonic reactions and negative aversive reactions to sucrose-quinine were also measured after microinjections of midazolam (0.0, 7.5, and 15 microg) into the parabrachial nucleus. Midazolam increased food intake and selectively enhanced positive hedonic taste reactivity patterns to the bittersweet solution when microinjections were delivered to the parabrachial nucleus. When administered to the other brainstem sites at the same doses, however, midazolam had no effect. We therefore conclude that the parabrachial nucleus can mediate the benzodiazepine-induced enhancement of the hedonic impact of taste as well as mediating the enhancement of eating behavior.

Excitotoxic lesions of the hippocampus disrupt runway but not consummatory contrast

Rats shifted from a 12-pellet to a 1-pellet reward for running in a straight runway showed a decrease in start, run, and goal speed to levels below rats that received only the 1-pellet reward throughout training (a negative contrast effect). Contrast was greatest in the goal region of the runway. Rats with damage to the hippocampus produced by the excitotoxin ibotenic acid failed to show a negative contrast effect under these conditions. The same lesioned rats tested in a consummatory, contrast procedure following a shift from 32% to 4% sucrose showed a negative contrast effect equivalent to sham-lesioned rats. These data suggest that the hippocampus is necessary for behavioral outcomes based on encoding or comparison that affect approach behavior, but not for such outcomes that affect consummatory behavior.

Preproenkephalin messenger RNA-expressing neurons in the rat parabrachial nucleus: subnuclear organization and projections to the intralaminar thalamus

The pontine parabrachial nucleus, which is a key structure in the central processing of autonomic, nociceptive and gustatory information, is rich in a variety of neuropeptides. In this study we have analysed the distribution of parabrachial neurons that express preproenkephalin messenger RNA, which encodes for the precursor protein for enkephalin opioids. Using an in situ hybridization method, we found that preproenkephalin messenger RNA-expressing neurons were present in large numbers in four major areas of the parabrachial nucleus: the Kölliker-Fuse nucleus, the external lateral subnucleus, the ventral lateral subnucleus, and in and near the internal lateral subnucleus. Many preproenkephalin messenger RNA-expressing neurons were also seen in the central lateral subnucleus, and in the medial and external medial subnuclei. Few labeled neurons were found in the dorsal and superior lateral subnuclei. Injection of the retrograde tracer substance cholera toxin subunit B into the midline and intralaminar thalamus demonstrated that the enkephalinergic neurons in and near the internal lateral subnucleus were thalamic-projecting neurons. Taken together with the results of previous tract-tracing studies, the present findings show that many of the enkephalinergic cell groups in the parabrachial nucleus are located within the terminal zones of the ascending projections that originate from nociresponsive neurons in the medullary dorsal horn and spinal cord, as well as from viscerosensory neurons within the nucleus of the solitary tract. The enkephalinergic neurons in the parabrachial nucleus may thus transmit noci- and visceroceptive-related information to their efferent targets. On the basis of the present and previous observations, we conclude that these targets include the intralaminar and midline thalamus, the ventrolateral medulla and the spinal cord. Through these connections, nociceptive and visceroceptive stimuli may influence several functions, such as arousal, respiration and antinociception.

Gustatory function in the parabrachial nuclei: implications from lesion studies in rats

In rodents, third order gustatory neurons reside in the parabrachial nuclei of the dorsal pons. Lesions in this area of the brain have a variety of consequences on taste-related behaviors. Some behaviors are severely impaired, such as the expression of either conditioned taste aversion or depletion-induced sodium appetite. Other taste-based behaviors are less affected or not influenced at all. Although the lesion-behavior approach possesses serious methodological limitations, the constellation of findings from studies employing this experimental strategy in the PBN has promising implications. Foremost among these is the suggestion that the neural circuitry subserving performance in some of these taste-guided behavioral paradigms is dissociable. This paper critically reviews this body of behavioral research and discusses the conceptual ramifications of the results.