The Americleft Psychosocial Outcomes Project: A Multicenter Approach to Advancing Psychosocial Outcomes for Youth With Cleft Lip and Palate

Longitudinal psychological well-being in caregivers of young children with cleft lip and/or palate

OBJECTIVE

Caregivers of children with chronic conditions can experience psychological distress and an impact on quality of life (QoL). Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) is one of the most common congenital conditions worldwide. Utilizing data extracted from The Cleft Collective cohort studies in the United Kingdom, this study investigated longitudinal psychological well-being in caregivers of young children with CL/P, to inform screening practices and early intervention.

METHODS

Baseline (post-diagnosis) and 5-year questionnaire data were extracted for 525 caregivers (342 biological mothers, 183 fathers/partners). Outcome measures included the PedsQL-Family Impact Module, the Perceived Stress Scale, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

RESULTS

QoL significantly improved from T1 (post-birth) to T2 (5 years) as reported by mothers and fathers/partners. At T2, scores on all measures were aligned with, or more favorable than, norms. A minority continued to report clinically significant levels of distress at 5 years. Predictors of poorer outcomes on all measures included a less positive life orientation, more negative appraisals of CL/P, less favorable baseline scores, lower healthcare satisfaction, and prior mental health conditions. Outcomes were also less favorable for caregivers of children with combined cleft lip and palate compared to other cleft types. Reductions in negative appraisals of CL/P were significantly associated with improved QoL over time.

CONCLUSIONS

QoL and psychological well-being in caregivers is generally positive at 5 years. A minority experienced poorer outcomes and routine assessment by a multidisciplinary team is therefore recommended. Targeting early negative appraisals may help to facilitate long-term caregiver adjustment.

Psychosocial Outcomes in Children with Cleft Lip and/or Palate: Associations of Demographic, Cleft Morphologic, and Treatment-Related Variables

OBJECTIVE

To determine associations of demographic, morphologic, and treatment protocol parameters with quality of life (QoL), appearance/speech satisfaction, and psychological adjustment.

DESIGN

Observational study utilizing retrospective report of protocol variables and current outcome variables.

SETTING

Six North American cleft treatment clinics.

PARTICIPANTS

Children, ages 8.0-10.99 years, with Cleft Lip ± Alveolus, Cleft Palate, Cleft Lip and Palate, and parents (N = 284).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Pediatric QoL Inventory (PedsQL): Parent, Child, Family Impact Module (FIM); Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS); Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL); CLEFT-Q.

RESULTS

Outcome scores were average with few differences by cleft type. Multiple regression analyses yielded significant associations (Ps < .05) between socioeconomic status, race, and age at assessment and parent- and self-reported measures. Females had higher PROMIS Depression (β=.20) but lower CBCL Affective (β = -.16) and PROMIS Stigma scores (β= -.24). Incomplete cleft lip was associated with lower PROMIS Depression, and more positive ratings of CLEFT-Q: Nose, Nostril, Lip Scar; CBCL Competence scores, (βs = -.17 to .17). Younger Age at Lip Closure was associated with higher CBCL School Competence (β= -.18). Younger Age at Palate Closure was associated with higher Child PedsQL Total, Physical, Psychosocial QoL, and better CLEFT-Q Speech Function (βs = -.18 to -.15). Furlow Palatoplasty was associated with more CBCL Externalizing Problems (β = .17) higher CBCL Activities (β = .16). For all diagnoses, fewer Total Cleft-Related Surgeries was associated with lower PROMIS Stigma and higher CBCL Total Competence and Activities (βs = -.16 to .15).

CONCLUSIONS

Demographic characteristics, lip morphology, and treatment variables are related to later psychological functioning.

Psychosocial Issues Related to Speech and Hearing in Patients With Clefts

INTRODUCTION

Individuals with cleft lip and palate often face persistent challenges related to speech and hearing disorders, impacting various aspects of their lives. These challenges can lead to additional mental health issues such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, anxiety, and depression, as well as heightened psychosocial challenges, including appearance-related issues, bullying, workplace discrimination, and impaired social interactions. Children and adolescents with these disorders commonly experience loneliness, peer rejection, and challenges in forming friendships, particularly during adolescence, while voice disorders can diminish the quality of life in older individuals.

CASE DESCRIPTION

This case study focuses on a 17-year-old male with unilateral cleft lip and palate undergoing treatment in Medellin, Colombia, aiming to provide insights into the intricate psychosocial challenges linked to speech and hearing difficulties in individuals with cleft conditions.

DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION

Clinical evaluations identified significant challenges concerning speech difficulties and self-perception, influenced by the patient's cleft condition, which impacts his self-esteem, confidence, and social skills development. The interconnectedness between speech and hearing challenges underscores the necessity for comprehensive care to address the multifaceted psychosocial aspects experienced by individuals with cleft conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

This case study used as an example, indicates that speech difficulties and psychosocial challenges related to cleft conditions are experienced from childhood and may persist into adulthood. These challenges can have profound effects on various aspects of life, including school, social interactions, family dynamics, and even romantic relationships. Consequently, the lack of confidence, social isolation, and limited social skills may delay patients from reaching their fullest potential.

Individuals with Cleft Lip and/or Palate Demonstrated Improved Self-Reported Psychosocial Functioning Following the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Objective

To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the psychosocial functioning of individuals with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P).

Methods

Patients with CL/P ≥ 6 years old were prospectively recruited from the Cleft and Craniofacial Clinic of a tertiary children's hospital. From July-October 2021, eligible patients (or their parent/guardian) were sent a survey regarding their psychosocial functioning before and after the start of the pandemic.

Main Outcome Measure

The difference between prepandemic and intrapandemic patient-reported outcome scores.

Results

Thirty-six patients (20 female, age: 15.9 ± 9.8 years) responded. Most had cleft lip and palate (77.8%), responded online (69.4%), interacted remotely via both voice- and video-conferencing (62.9%), and wore masks routinely (77.1%). Similar numbers of patients responded independently (27.8%), responded with the help of a parent/guardian (36.1%), or had a parent/guardian respond on their behalf (36.1%). General social-emotional well-being (p = 0.004, r rb = 0.659) and satisfaction with facial appearance (p = 0.044, r rb = 0.610) significantly improved after the start of the pandemic. Compared to their general intrapandemic social-emotional well-being scores, patients reported higher scores while wearing a mask (r rb = 0.827) and lower scores while interacting remotely (r rb = 0.605), although all were still significantly improved compared to their prepandemic scores (p ≤ 0.010). Patients also reported significant improvement in social functioning while wearing a mask (p = 0.036, r rb = 0.519), whereas they did not when considering their general intrapandemic feelings/experiences (p = 0.269, r rb = 0.211).

Conclusion

Patients with CL/P demonstrated significant improvement in overall social-emotional well-being, satisfaction with facial appearance, and social functioning after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly when wearing a mask.

Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes Among Children With Cleft Differences

Introduction Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) and craniofacial differences can lead to diminished speech and swallowing function resulting in communication and social challenges throughout childhood. To monitor changes in patients' psychosocial health and velopharyngeal function, the Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC) and Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Effects on Life Outcomes (VELO) survey tools can be utilized. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between VPI quality-of-life outcomes and psychosocial disturbances through a comparative analysis of PSC and VELO parental surveys among children followed by a craniofacial team. Methods A retrospective chart review was completed using data from a single, multidisciplinary cleft and craniofacial team. Previously completed parental survey responses between 2010 and 2022 were collated and results were analyzed using a Spearman's rank correlation test (rs). Results There were 89 subjects who completed both surveys on the same day (n = 148 survey pairs (s)). Patients aged three to five years old (s = 88) had a mean VELO of 17.9 (0-65) and a mean PSC of 7.9 (0-27), while patients aged six to eight years old (s = 60) had a mean VELO of 16.6 (0-74) and a mean PSC of 12.0 (0-37). The strongest correlation observed for both age groups was between the total PSC and VELO Speech Limitations sub-scores (three to five years old: rs = 0.537, p < 0.001; six to eight years old: rs = 0.330, p = 0.010). Similarly, children in the six- to eight-year-old group with cleft lip and palate showed a correlation between the total PSC and VELO Speech Limitations (rs = 0.583, p < 0.001). Conclusion This study suggests a relationship between PSC and VELO scores among children ages three to eight years old with cleft differences and demonstrates that specific domains within the VELO questionnaire should be considered as being associated with a higher risk for psychosocial impairment. Specifically, higher VELO Speech Limitations sub-scores may portend a greater risk for poor psychosocial outcomes supporting the importance of early interventions in this group.

Screening for Academic Risk Among Students With Cleft Lip and/or Palate: Patterns of Risk and Qualities of Effective Tools

This study evaluated the effectiveness of academic screening measures in relation to parent-reported diagnoses.

Multicenter, retrospective cohort study including structured interviews, questionnaires, and chart reviews.

Six North American cleft centers.

Children (n = 391) with cleft lip and/or palate, ages 8 to 10 years of age (192 male) and their guardians were recruited during regular clinic visits.

Parent and child ratings on the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) School Scale, child report on CleftQ School Scale, parent report on the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-Third Edition Functional Academics (ABAS-FA) Scale and Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) School Competency Scale, parent interview, and medical chart review.

Risk for concerns ranged from 12% to 41%, with higher risk reflected on the CBCL-SC compared to other measures. Males with cleft palate were consistently at the highest risk. Only 9% of the sample had a parent-reported diagnosis of a learning or language disability. Ratings from the ABAS-FA and CBCL-SC had the highest utility in identifying those with language and/or learning concerns.

As cleft teams work to develop standardized batteries for screening and monitoring of patients, it is important to evaluate the effectiveness of measures in identifying those at highest risk. When screening for language and learning disorders, questions related to potential academic struggles, such as increased school effort or increased school distress, are most useful. Referrals for follow-up evaluation are recommended for those identified at high risk.

A Multisite Study Investigating Child and Parent Proxy Reported Quality of Life in Children With Cleft Lip and/or Palate

This observational, multisite cohort study explored health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P), including interrater agreement and ratings for this group relative to clinical cutoff scores and published means for healthy and chronically ill children.

Participants (338 children ages 8-10 years, 45.9% male and their parents, 82.0% female) across 6 sites completed the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scales (PedsQL).

Intraclass correlation revealed poor interrater agreement for most HRQoL domains. Although ratings were generally higher than those expected for children with a chronic illness, child ratings were below healthy means for school functioning, and parent proxy ratings were below healthy means for all domains except physical functioning. Lower ratings consistent with chronic illness means were found for self-reported emotional and psychosocial functioning in children with cleft lip and palate (CLP), as well as parent proxy-reported emotional, school, and psychosocial functioning for children with cleft palate (CP). Scores were most likely to be in the clinical range for children with CP for social, school, and total functioning.

Although parent proxy report provides important information about observed functioning, poor interrater agreement indicates that both child and parent proxy reported HRQoL should be included in outcomes assessment for CL/P. HRQoL ratings may be higher for children with CL/P compared to youth with other chronic illnesses, but psychosocial functioning may be negatively impacted when compared with healthy youth, particularly for emotional, social, and school functioning in children with CLP or CP.

Interdisciplinary Team Care for Children with Facial Differences

Children who have cleft and craniofacial diagnoses require coordinated, interdisciplinary treatment planning from birth to young adulthood. Teams that adhere to the Parameters of Care and maintain annual review by the American Cleft Palate Craniofacial Association Commission on Approval of Teams are published at www.acpa-cpf.org to assist families in obtaining that care. The six critical components to this interdisciplinary care focus on the team's composition, the team's management and responsibilities, the inclusion of patient and family/caregiver communication, an ongoing commitment to cultural competence, the importance of psychosocial and social services provided for the child and family, and the dedication to outcomes assessment. Primary care physicians are in a unique position to help direct families to this online directory for the best possible outcomes. [Pediatr Ann. 2023;52(1):e18-e22.].

Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Oral Health in Children With Cleft Lip and Palate

OBJECTIVE

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) exist to present recommendations and policies aimed at optimizing the oral health of children and adolescents born with cleft lip and/or palate. The aim of this review is to identify and assess the scope, quality, adequacy, and consistency of CPGs related to oral health in children and adolescents with clefts, along with reporting any differences and shortcomings.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature of CPGs following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines was conducted. Assessment of selected CPGs was performed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II methodological quality instrument.

RESULTS

Only 7 CPGs fulfilled the criteria. Of these, 4 were from the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, and 1 each from the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine, and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. The lowest overall mean scores were in the domain "Rigor of Development" (mean 29.58%, SD 17.11), revealing lower quality in methodology of the guideline. The domain "Clarity of Presentation" (mean 73.80%, SD 7.87) revealed the best score.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review results reveal a lack of integrated high-quality CPGs that can be used as universal guidelines by health workers in a range of disciplines for improving oral health in children and adolescents with cleft problems.

Adaptation of the Quality of Life Adolescent Cleft Questionnaire for Spanish children and adolescents with cleft lip and/or palate

BACKGROUND

The Quality of Life Adolescent Cleft Questionnaire is a measure of quality of life in cleft lip/palate (CL/P) and includes items on pre-treatment and post-treatment status. Items, however, were originally organized in a factor structure that prevents a formal pre-treatment to post-treatment comparison. Additionally, the questionnaire was tested in older patients.

AIM

We aimed to explore a factor structure that allows a comparison of pre- to post-treatment status in children and adolescents with CL/P.

DESIGN

The sample comprised 60 children and adolescents with CL/P. The scale was divided into two groups of items (24 comparing pre-treatment and post-treatment status and 26 measuring current quality of life). Two different exploratory and confirmatory analyses were conducted (one for each group of items). Sources of criterion validity were investigated with measures of self-esteem and self-efficacy.

RESULTS

The results supported a 6-factor structure for the pre-treatment and post-treatment items. In the second group of items, 9 items were removed due to inadequate functioning and a final 4-factor solution was obtained. The criterion validity of factors was good.

CONCLUSION

The proposed factor solution might be more useful to detect the perceived satisfaction in different areas and can be used in younger patients.

Chinese Color Nest Project : An accelerated longitudinal brain-mind cohort

The ongoing Chinese Color Nest Project (CCNP) was established to create normative charts for brain structure and function across the human lifespan, and link age-related changes in brain imaging measures to psychological assessments of behavior, cognition, and emotion using an accelerated longitudinal design. In the initial stage, CCNP aims to recruit 1520 healthy individuals (6-90 years), which comprises three phases: developing (devCCNP: 6-18 years, N = 480), maturing (matCCNP: 20-60 years, N = 560) and aging (ageCCNP: 60-84 years, N = 480). In this paper, we present an overview of the devCCNP, including study design, participants, data collection and preliminary findings. The devCCNP has acquired data with three repeated measurements from 2013 to 2017 in Southwest University, Chongqing, China (CCNP-SWU, N = 201). It has been accumulating baseline data since July 2018 and the second wave data since September 2020 in Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (CCNP-CAS, N = 168). Each participant in devCCNP was followed up for 2.5 years at 1.25-year intervals. The devCCNP obtained longitudinal neuroimaging, biophysical, social, behavioral and cognitive data via MRI, parent- and self-reported questionnaires, behavioral assessments, and computer tasks. Additionally, data were collected on children's learning, daily life and emotional states during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. We address data harmonization across the two sites and demonstrated its promise of characterizing the growth curves for the overall brain morphometry using multi-center longitudinal data. CCNP data will be shared via the National Science Data Bank and requests for further information on collaboration and data sharing are encouraged.

Perceptions Regarding the Academic and Cognitive Performance of Individuals With Cleft Lip and/or Palate

INTRODUCTION

Factors such as teachers' appropriate support and social interactions have an impact on the academic performance of children with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). This study was designed to investigate the perceptions of the teachers and the general public about the academic and cognitive performance of individuals with CL/P.

METHODS

This study was included 360 (male/female = 102/258) teachers and 640 (male/female = 259/381) participants that represent the general public. Anonymized web-based and paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaire that included multiple-choice and yes/no questions were administered. Within-group differences and intergroup differences were analyzed in terms of academic and cognitive performance.

RESULTS

Most of the teachers and the general public indicated that the academic and cognitive performance of individuals with CL/P is the same as their unaffected peers. A significantly higher proportion of the teachers indicated that the academic performance of children with CL/P is the same as their unaffected peers than the general public.

CONCLUSION

Considering that the general public's attitudes and appropriate teacher support are crucial to prevent adverse impacts on the lives of individuals with CL/P, it is important to support teachers with the appropriate information and to encourage the public to recognize that everybody with a facial difference should be treated as an individual rather than a disability.

Retrospective Evaluation of Number of Surgeries and Parent Ratings of Academic and Behavioral Functioning Among Children With Isolated Oral Clefts

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate possible relationships between number of surgeries and parent ratings of academic functioning among children with isolated oral clefts.

DESIGN

Multicenter, retrospective cohort study including structured interviews, questionnaires, and chart reviews.

SETTING

Completion of questionnaires occurred during clinical visits at 6 different cleft centers across North America.

PARTICIPANTS

Parents of 285 children with isolated clefts of the lip and/or palate, aged 8 to 10 years old, participated in structured interviews and completed questionnaires regarding the academic and behavioral functioning of their children.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Parent interview and medical chart review of number of surgeries to date and parent ratings on the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, Third Edition-Functional Academics Scale (ABAS-FA) and Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Competency Scale.

RESULTS

Parent ratings of ABAS-FA were at or above normative expectations, while ratings across CBCL Competency Scales were lower than normative expectations. Socioeconomic status (SES), age, and race were consistent predictors of parent ratings (higher SES, older age, and Caucasian race were associated with better functioning). Number of surgeries did not add significantly to academic ratings but did significantly contribute to ratings of social and activity participation. Patients with more surgeries were rated with lower functioning in these domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings do not support a connection between number of surgeries and later ratings of academic functioning but do support a connection to social and activity involvement. Recommendations for conducting direct studies of the connection between surgeries and academic functioning as well as clinical considerations for surgeries and impact on social and activity involvement are discussed.

Personality and Cognitive-Emotional Variables in Spanish Children and Adolescents With and Without Cleft Lip and/or Palate

OBJECTIVES

To analyze personality (Big Five Model) and cognitive-emotional variables in children and adolescents with a cleft lip/palate (s) in comparison to an equivalent peer sample without an orofacial cleft.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study with data collected using self-reported questionnaires over 2 years.

SETTING

Data were collected during visits to health center dental clinics.

PATIENTS

Children and adolescents (aged 8-18 years) with nonsyndromic CL/P (n = 60) and without a cleft (n = 60).

METHOD

Patients completed questionnaires with assistance as needed from a member of the research team.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Children's Perceived Self-Efficacy, Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (child version), Big Five Questionnaire for Children, and Alexithymia Questionnaire for Children.

RESULTS

When accounting for age, children with CL/P had normative self-efficacy and cognitive-emotional regulation strategies, with the protective factor of significantly lower rumination than peers. Children with CL/P were significantly lower on the Big Five personality areas of conscientiousness, openness to experience, extraversion, and agreeableness along with significantly higher neuroticism. They were similarly significantly higher than peers for alexithymia.

CONCLUSION

Children with CL/P showed strengths in self-efficacy typical of peers and less use of some maladaptive coping strategies; however, they also had higher levels of alexithymia and risk factors associated with the Big Five Model of personality. Strategies may be clinically useful that maximize areas of strength to support children with CL/P in expressing their emotions to reduce alexithymia, coping with of negative affect, and building assertiveness.

Management of the Cleft Nasal Tip: An Overview of Classic Techniques and Strategies

The challenges of cleft reconstruction have been present for centuries. However, understanding of the cleft nasal tip and the evolution of techniques decidedly began in the 20th century and refinement continues into the present day. Although a multitude of technical descriptions and case series have been published, a compendium of seminal techniques, which have shaped modern thought, has not been compiled in the literature. In this review, we discuss the anatomical disturbances in the cleft nasal tip anomaly, the timing and strategy of tip correction, and the major classic techniques for management of the cleft nasal tip. In addition, we have categorized the classic techniques into concepts that they embody.

Identifying Psychosocial Risk Factors Among Families of Children With Craniofacial Conditions: Validation of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool-Craniofacial Version

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool-Craniofacial Version (PAT-CV), a screening instrument for psychosocial risk in families of children with craniofacial conditions, and to examine risk classification of patients in a craniofacial population.

DESIGN

Prospective, cross-sectional, single-center study.

SETTING

Interdisciplinary cleft lip and palate/craniofacial center at a US children's hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Parents/caregivers (n = 242) of 217 children ages 1 month to 17 years being treated for a congenital syndromic or nonsyndromic craniofacial condition completed the PAT-CV and validating measures from July 2015 to July 2016. The PAT-CV was completed by 121 caregivers a second time to assess test-retest reliability.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

PAT-CV, Child Behavior Checklist, Adult Self-Report, Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, Craniofacial Experiences Questionnaire, and Family Environment Scale.

RESULTS

Construct validity of the PAT-CV was supported by significant correlations ( P < .001) between PAT-CV total and subscale scores and the validated measures. PAT-CV total scores categorized 59.9% of families within the universal risk group, 32.3% within the targeted risk group, and 7.8% within the clinical range. Good criterion validity was indicated by significantly higher scores ( P < .0001) obtained on the validated measures for those in the targeted and clinical risk groups. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.86) and test-retest reliability for the PAT-CV total score ( r = 0.77, P < .0001) were acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

The PAT-CV appears to be a reliable and valid screening instrument for psychosocial risk. Accurate identification of risk and implementation of appropriate interventions may contribute to improvements in medical and psychosocial outcomes.