1
|
Drexl K, Ralisa V, Rosselet-Amoussou J, Wen CK, Urben S, Plessen KJ, Glaus J. Readdressing the Ongoing Challenge of Missing Data in Youth Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies: Meta-Analysis Update. J Med Internet Res 2025; 27:e65710. [PMID: 40305088 PMCID: PMC12079076 DOI: 10.2196/65710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2024] [Revised: 01/17/2025] [Accepted: 02/14/2025] [Indexed: 05/02/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is pivotal in longitudinal health research in youth, but potential bias associated with nonparticipation, omitted reports, or dropout threatens its clinical validity. Previous meta-analytic evidence is inconsistent regarding specific determinants of missing data. OBJECTIVE This meta-analysis aimed to update and expand upon previous research by examining key participation metrics-acceptance, compliance, and retention-in youth EMA studies. In addition, it sought to identify potential moderators among sample and design characteristics, with the goal of better understanding and mitigating the impact of missing data. METHODS We used a bibliographic database search to identify EMA studies involving children and adolescents published from 2001 to November 2023. Eligible studies used mobile-delivered EMA protocols in samples with an average age up to 18 years. We conducted separate meta-analyses for acceptance, compliance, and retention rates, and performed meta-regressions to address sample and design characteristics. Furthermore, we extracted and pooled sample-level effect sizes related to correlates of response compliance. Risk of publication bias was assessed using funnel plots, regression tests, and sensitivity analyses targeting inflated compliance rates. RESULTS We identified 285 samples, including 17,441 participants aged 5 to 17.96 years (mean age 14.22, SD 2.24 years; mean percentage of female participants 55.7%). Pooled estimates were 67.27% (k=88, 95% CI 62.39-71.96) for acceptance, 71.97% (k=216, 95% CI 69.83-74.11) for compliance, and 96.57% (k=169, 95% CI 95.42-97.56) for retention. Despite overall poor moderation of participation metrics, acceptance rates decreased as the number of EMA items increased (log-transformed b=-0.115, SE 0.036; 95% CI -0.185 to -0.045; P=.001; R2=19.98), compliance rates declined by 0.8% per year of publication (SE 0.25, 95% CI -1.3 to -0.3; P=.002; R2=4.17), and retention rates dropped with increasing study duration (log-transformed b=-0.061, SE 0.015; 95% CI -0.091 to 0.032; P<.001; R2=10.06). The benefits of monetary incentives on response compliance diminished as the proportion of female participants increased (b=-0.002, SE 0.001; 95% CI -0.003 to -0.001; P=.003; R2=9.47). Within-sample analyses showed a small but significant effect indicating higher compliance in girls compared to boys (k=25; g=0.18; 95% CI 0.06-0.31; P=.003), but no significant age-related effects were found (k=14; z score=0.05; 95% CI -0.01 to 0.16). CONCLUSIONS Despite a 5-fold increase in included effect sizes compared to the initial review, the variability in rates of missing data that one can expect based on specific sample and design characteristics remains substantial. The inconsistency in identifying robust moderators highlights the need for greater attention to missing data and its impact on study results. To eradicate any health-related bias in EMA studies, researchers should collectively increase transparent reporting practices, intensify primary methodological research, and involve participants' perspectives on missing data. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42022376948; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022376948.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantin Drexl
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Vanisha Ralisa
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Joëlle Rosselet-Amoussou
- Medical Library-Cery, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Prilly, Switzerland
| | - Cheng K Wen
- Dornsife Center for Self-Report Science, College of Letters, Arts,. and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Sébastien Urben
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Kerstin Jessica Plessen
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jennifer Glaus
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Coppersmith DD, Bentley KH, Kleiman EM, Jaroszewski AC, Daniel M, Nock MK. Automated Real-Time Tool for Promoting Crisis Resource Use for Suicide Risk (ResourceBot): Development and Usability Study. JMIR Ment Health 2024; 11:e58409. [PMID: 39481100 PMCID: PMC11565085 DOI: 10.2196/58409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 08/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/16/2024] [Indexed: 11/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-time monitoring captures information about suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) as they occur and offers great promise to learn about STBs. However, this approach also introduces questions about how to monitor and respond to real-time information about STBs. Given the increasing use of real-time monitoring, there is a need for novel, effective, and scalable tools for responding to suicide risk in real time. OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to develop and test an automated tool (ResourceBot) that promotes the use of crisis services (eg, 988) in real time through a rule-based (ie, if-then) brief barrier reduction intervention. METHODS ResourceBot was tested in a 2-week real-time monitoring study of 74 adults with recent suicidal thoughts. RESULTS ResourceBot was deployed 221 times to 36 participants. There was high engagement with ResourceBot (ie, 87% of the time ResourceBot was deployed, a participant opened the tool and submitted a response to it), but zero participants reported using crisis services after engaging with ResourceBot. The most reported reasons for not using crisis services were beliefs that the resources would not help, wanting to handle things on one's own, and the resources requiring too much time or effort. At the end of the study, participants rated ResourceBot with good usability (mean of 75.6 out of 100) and satisfaction (mean of 20.8 out of 32). CONCLUSIONS This study highlights both the possibilities and challenges of developing effective real-time interventions for suicide risk and areas for refinement in future work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kate H Bentley
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Evan M Kleiman
- Department of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States
| | - Adam C Jaroszewski
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Merryn Daniel
- Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Matthew K Nock
- Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Franciscan Children's Hospital, Brighton, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Andrewes HE, Cavelti M, Hulbert C, Cotton SM, Betts JK, Jackson HJ, McCutcheon L, Gleeson J, Davey CG, Chanen AM. An analysis of real-time suicidal ideation and its relationship with retrospective reports among young people with borderline personality disorder. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2024; 54:468-478. [PMID: 38375970 DOI: 10.1111/sltb.13058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to analyze the real-time variability of suicidal ideation intensity and the relationship between real-time and retrospective reports of suicidal ideation made on the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS), among young people with borderline personality disorder (BPD). METHODS Young people (15-25-year olds) with BPD (N = 46), recruited from two government-funded mental health services, rated the intensity of their suicidal ideation six times per day for 7 days before completing the BSS. RESULTS For 70% of participants, suicidal ideation changed in intensity approximately five times across the week, both within and between days. BSS ratings were most highly correlated with the highest real-time ratings of suicidal ideation. However, this was not significantly different from the relationship between the BSS and both the average and most recent ratings. Median ratings of suicidal ideation intensity were higher on the BSS compared with an equivalent question asked in real time. CONCLUSION Findings suggest that young people with BPD experience high levels of fluctuation in their intensity of suicidal ideation across a week and that retrospective reports of suicidal ideation might be more reflective of the most intense experience of suicidal ideation across the week.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly E Andrewes
- Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marialuisa Cavelti
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Translational Research Centre, University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Carol Hulbert
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan M Cotton
- Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer K Betts
- Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Henry J Jackson
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louise McCutcheon
- Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - John Gleeson
- Healthy Brain and Mind Research Centre and School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christopher G Davey
- Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew M Chanen
- Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen T, Niu L, Zhu J, Hou X, Tao H, Ma Y, Silenzio V, Lin K, Zhou L. Effects of frequent assessments on the severity of suicidal thoughts: an ecological momentary assessment study. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1358604. [PMID: 38827619 PMCID: PMC11141048 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1358604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective In recent years, there has been a significant increase in research using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to explore suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs). Meanwhile, concerns have been raised regarding the potential impacts of frequent and intense STBs assessments on the study participants. Methods From November 2021 to June 2023, a total of 83 adolescent and young adult outpatients (Mage = 21.0, SDage = 6.3, 71.1% female), who were diagnosed with mood disorders, were recruited from three psychiatric clinics in China. Smartphone-based EMA was used to measure suicidal thoughts three times per day at randomly selected times. We examined the change of suicidal thoughts in each measurement and within 1 day to evaluate potential adverse effects using Bayesian multilevel models. Results The 3,105 effective surveys were nested in 83 participants (median follow-up days: 14 days). The results of two-level models indicated that suicidal thoughts decreased during the monitoring period. However, this effect varied among different individuals in the two-level model. Conclusion Our findings did not support the notion that repeated assessment of suicidal thoughts is iatrogenic, but future research should continue to investigate the impact of frequent assessment on suicidal thoughts, taking into account individual differences and utilizing larger sample sizes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tengwei Chen
- Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Lu Niu
- Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jiaxin Zhu
- Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiaofei Hou
- Tianjin Anding Hospital, Mental Health Center of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Haojuan Tao
- National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, and Department of Psychiatry, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yarong Ma
- The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Vincent Silenzio
- Urban-Global Public Health, Rutgers School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, United States
| | - Kangguang Lin
- The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- School of Health and Life Sciences University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, China
| | - Liang Zhou
- The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|