Suppression of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by cytotoxic drugs

CAR-T Cell-Mediated B-Cell Depletion in Central Nervous System Autoimmunity

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) B-cell depletion is a remarkably successful multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, which target antigens in a non-major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-restricted manner, can penetrate tissues more thoroughly than mAbs. However, a previous study indicated that anti-CD19 CAR-T cells can paradoxically exacerbate experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) disease. We tested anti-CD19 CAR-T cells in a B-cell-dependent EAE model that is responsive to anti-CD20 B-cell depletion similar to the clinical benefit of anti-CD20 mAb treatment in MS.

METHODS

Anti-CD19 CAR-T cells or control cells that overexpressed green fluorescent protein were transferred into C57BL/6 mice pretreated with cyclophosphamide (Cy). Mice were immunized with recombinant human (rh) myelin oligodendrocyte protein (MOG), which causes EAE in a B-cell-dependent manner. Mice were evaluated for B-cell depletion, clinical and histologic signs of EAE, and immune modulation.

RESULTS

Clinical scores and lymphocyte infiltration were reduced in mice treated with either anti-CD19 CAR-T cells with Cy or control cells with Cy, but not with Cy alone. B-cell depletion was observed in peripheral lymphoid tissue and in the CNS of mice treated with anti-CD19 CAR-T cells with Cy pretreatment. Th1 or Th17 populations did not differ in anti-CD19 CAR-T cell, control cell-treated animals, or Cy alone.

DISCUSSION

In contrast to previous data showing that anti-CD19 CAR-T cell treatment exacerbated EAE, we observed that anti-CD19 CAR-T cells ameliorated EAE. In addition, anti-CD19 CAR-T cells thoroughly depleted B cells in peripheral tissues and in the CNS. However, the clinical benefit occurred independently of antigen specificity or B-cell depletion.

Role of immunosuppressive therapy for the treatment of multiple sclerosis

Immunosuppressives have been used in multiple sclerosis (MS) since 1966. Today, we have many treatments for the relapsing forms of the disease, including 8 US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies, with more soon to be introduced. Given the current treatment landscape what place do immunosuppressants have in combating MS? Trial work and our experience suggest that immunosuppressives still have an important role in treating MS. Cyclophosphamide finds use in treating patients with severe, inflammatory relapsing remitting MS or those suffering from a fulminant attack. We tend to employ mycophenolate mofetil as an add-on to injectable therapy for patients experiencing breakthrough activity. Some progressive (primary progressive multiple sclerosis or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis) patients may stabilize after treatment with either cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate. We rarely employ mitoxantrone because of potential cardiac or carcinogenic effects. We prefer to use cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil in preference to methotrexate because evidence of efficacy is limited for this drug. We have less experience with azathioprine, but it may be an alternative for patients with limited options who are unable to tolerate conventional therapies.

Intensive immunosuppression in progressive multiple sclerosis. A randomized, three-arm study of high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide, plasma exchange, and ACTH

Fifty-eight patients with severe, progressive multiple sclerosis were prospectively randomized to one of three treatments: 20 received intravenous ACTH, 20 received high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide plus ACTH, and 18 were placed on a regimen consisting of plasma exchange, low-dose oral cyclophosphamide, and ACTH. The three groups were similar in age, sex, duration and type of disease, and degree of disability. Before treatment and six months and one year after treatment, a disability-status score, ambulation index, and functional-status score were determined, and a quantitative neurologic examination was performed. In the ACTH group, the number of patients stabilized or improved was 8 of 20 at six months and 4 of 20 at one year; in the cyclophosphamide-ACTH group, 18 of 20 at six months and 16 of 20 at one year; and in the plasma exchange group, 11 of 18 at six months and 9 of 18 at one year. High-dose cyclophosphamide plus ACTH was most effective in halting progression of the disease at both 6 and 12 months (at 12 months, cyclophosphamide-ACTH vs. ACTH, P = 0.0004; cyclophosphamide-ACTH vs. plasma exchange, P = 0.087). Thus, progressive multiple sclerosis may be stabilized by short-term, intensive immunosuppression with cyclophosphamide plus ACTH.