Detection of micrometastatic prostate cancer cells in the bone marrow of patients with prostate cancer

Radionuclide Therapy of Bone Metastases

The skeleton is a potential metastatic target of many malignant tumors. Up to 85% of prostate and breast cancer patients may develop bone metastases causing severe pain syndromes in many of them. In patients suffering from multilocular, mainly osteoblastic lesions and pain syndrome, radionuclide therapy is recommended for pain palliation. Low-energy beta-emitting radionuclides ((153)samarium-ethylenediaminetetrameth-ylenephosphonate (EDTMP) and (89)strontium) deliver high radiation doses to bone metastases and micrometastases in the bone marrow, but only negligible doses to the hematopoietic marrow. The response rate regarding pain syndrome is about 75%; about 25% of the patients may even become pain free. The therapy is repeatable, depending on cell counts. Concomitant treatment with modern bisphosphonates does not interfere with the treatment effects. Clinical trials using a new, not yet approved nuclide ((223)Radium) and/or combinations of chemotherapy and radionuclides are aiming at a more curative approach.

Review: Biological relevance of disseminated tumor cells in cancer patients

The prognosis of cancer patients is largely determined by the occurrence of distant metastases. In patients with primary tumors, this relapse is mainly due to clinically occult micrometastasis present in secondary organs at primary diagnosis but not detectable even with high resolution imaging procedures. Sensitive and specific immunocytochemical and molecular assays enable the detection and characterization of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) at the single cell level in bone marrow (BM) as the common homing site of DTC and circulating tumor cells (CTC) in peripheral blood. Because of the high variability of results in DTC and CTC detection, there is an urgent need for standardized methods. In this review, we will focus on BM and present currently available methods for the detection and characterization of DTC. Furthermore, we will discuss data on the biology of DTC and the clinical relevance of DTC detection. While the prognostic impact of DTC in BM has clearly been shown for primary breast cancer patients, less is known about the clinical relevance of DTC in patients with other carcinomas. Current findings suggest that DTC are capable to survive chemotherapy and persist in a dormant nonproliferating state over years. To what extent these DTC have stem cell properties is subject of ongoing investigations. Further characterization is required to understand the biology of DTC and to identify new targets for improved risk prevention and tailoring of therapy. Our review will focus on breast, colon, lung, and prostate cancer as the main tumor entities in Europe and the United States.

Prognostic value of circulating prostate cells in patients with a rising PSA after radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

To predict poor outcome in patients with a biochemical recurrence (rising PSA) after radical prostatectomy (RP), urologists rely primarily on Gleason score, PSA doubling time, and time from surgery to biochemical (i.e., PSA) recurrence. In the present study, we assess the value of RT-PCR detection circulating prostate cells in blood of patients with a rising PSA.

METHODS

RNA from blood samples was obtained from 55 patients with a rising PSA and from 45 patients without evidence of biochemical failure (PSA < 0.1 ng/ml). Both groups were matched for age, Gleason score, pT stage, and interval between radical prostatectomy and PCR testing.

RESULTS

PSA positive cells were detected in 1/45 (2%) patients without a PSA recurrence and 19/55 (34%) patients with a PSA recurrence. In the rising PSA group, mean PSA doubling time was significantly shorter in patients with positive RT-PCR (5 months) than in patients with negative RT-PCR (16 months; P = 0.001). An earlier onset of recurrence was also detected in patients with a positive RT-PCR (31 months for positive RT-PCR vs. 50 months for negative RT-PCR) but this result did not achieve statistical significance (P = 0.102). Salvage radiation therapy was administered in 15 patients. Three of the five patients with a positive RT-PCR progressed during radiotherapy whereas 7 of the 10 patients with a negative RT-PCR obtained a complete response and none have progressed.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary results suggest that RT-PCR detection of prostate cells in blood of patients after RP correlates with rapidly progressing biochemical failure after RP.

Metastasis suppression: the evolving role of metastasis suppressor genes for regulating cancer cell growth at the secondary site

PURPOSE

The prevention and treatment of prostate cancer metastasis continue to provide a significant clinical challenge. Identification of the rate limiting steps of metastasis and their underlying molecular mechanisms may lead to new therapeutic targets and also allow more accurate risk stratification for clinical metastases. We review the literature supporting growth of disseminated tumor cells at the secondary site as a key rate limiting step in metastasis. We also reviewed the definition, identification and characterization of metastasis suppressor genes, and discuss their evolving role in regulating this step.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed MEDLINE searches and manual bibliographic reviews on the specific steps of metastasis, including growth at the secondary site. In addition, we performed a comprehensive literature review to identify genes fitting the classic definition of a metastasis suppressor gene. The literature was also searched to assess the status of each gene in clinical cancer and evaluate functional support for the potential involvement of each gene in regulating growth at the secondary site.

RESULTS

Clinical studies in prostate cancer and other cancer types suggest that dissemination to the secondary site is often an early clinical event. However, not all patients with tumor cells at the secondary site have overt metastatic lesions even in the absence of therapy, suggesting that growth at the secondary site may be highly inefficient. Complimentary approaches have allowed researchers to document and quantify the inefficiency of cancer cell growth at the secondary site. Regarding the mechanism of growth control, many studies support a role for the interaction of a cancer cell and the microenvironment at the secondary site influencing whether growth into metastasis may occur. The 7 genes that suppress metastasis without affecting primary tumor growth that have been identified are KAI1, CD44, mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) kinase 4, nm23-H1, nm23-H2, KiSS1 and BrMS1. Three of these genes (KAI1, CD44 and MAPK kinase 4) act as metastasis suppressor genes of prostate cancer, while the remainder have yet to be tested in this cancer type. Loss of expression has been demonstrated for most of these genes during the clinical progression of prostate cancer to metastasis. MAPK kinase 4 and KiSS1 appear to suppress metastasis by inhibiting cancer cell growth at the secondary site. Interestingly many metastasis suppressor genes have common roles in growth control, adhesion and cytoskeletal reorganization, suggesting a common mechanism of metastasis suppression. Proposed candidate pathways include signaling through Src kinase and Rac GTPase.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings discussed support growth at the secondary site as a clinical target for metastasis treatment and prevention. Metastasis suppressor genes may offer valuable mechanistic insight for guiding specific therapeutic strategies, which may include drug induced reactivation of metastasis suppressor genes and their signaling pathways. Clinical assessment of metastasis suppressor gene product status in disseminated cancer cells may improve the accuracy of predicting the prognosis in patients with clinically localized disease.

Increased risk of systemic relapses associated with bone marrow micrometastasis and circulating tumor cells in localized ewing tumor

PURPOSE

The presence of metastasis is a major prognostic factor in Ewing tumor (ET). The relapse pattern of patients with localized tumors has long indicated that cases with disseminated ET cells escape detection at diagnosis. ET cells are characterized by specific gene fusions that can be detected with high sensitivity and specificity by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

RT-PCR targeting EWS-FLI-1 or EWS-ERG transcripts was used to search for occult tumor cells in peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) at diagnosis in 172 patients with ET, and the prognostic significance of this parameter was assessed.

RESULTS

As we suggested previously in a smaller series of patients, RT-PCR positivity of the BM was correlated with a high risk of adverse outcome in the overall study population (P =.007). More interestingly, among patients with otherwise localized tumors, BM micrometastasis also predicted significantly poorer disease-free survival rates (P =.043). The presence of circulating tumor cells (CTC) was more frequently observed in patients with large tumors (P =.006). CTC were associated with a poor outcome among patients with clinically localized disease (P =.045). Patients with clinically localized disease and peripheral occult tumor cells as evidenced by BM and/or PB RT-PCR positivity had axial or proximal tumors and experienced relapses at a systemic rather than at a local level.

CONCLUSION

Patients with localized ET and BM micrometastasis or CTC are comparable to patients with metastases in terms of the localization of the primary tumor, outcome, and relapse pattern.

Neoadjuvant estramustine and etoposide followed by concurrent estramustine and definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary results

PURPOSE

Current therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer is suboptimal. A treatment regimen was designed to improve systemic control by neoadjuvant targeting of hormone-sensitive and -insensitive micrometastatic disease and to improve local control by escalating the biologic effective dose to the prostate using estramustine (EMP) concurrently with radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (Stages T3/T4 or T1c/T2b/T2c with a Gleason score of > or =7 and a serum PSA >15 ng/ml) were entered onto this trial. Therapy consisted of two 21-day cycles of oral estramustine (10 mg/kg/day) in three divided doses and oral etoposide (50 mg/m(2)/day, in two divided doses), followed by concurrent estramustine (10 mg/kg/day, PO) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Two patients required discontinuation of chemotherapy due to development of Grade 3 and 4 toxicity. All others completed both components of therapy per protocol guidelines. Minor toxicities included alopecia (100% of patients), anemia (69%), leukopenia (37%), thrombocytopenia (19%), and nausea (6%) but did not require dose modifications. There were no fatalities. Actuarial 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) were 88% and 73%, respectively. Local control rate, assessed by repeated prostate biopsies at 18 months post completion of therapy, was 71%.

CONCLUSION

The described regimen is well tolerated, and preliminary efficacy data are encouraging. The underlying concepts of early targeting of both hormone-sensitive and -insensitive micrometastatic clones, in combination with aggressive local therapy, warrant further investigation.

Repetitive and site-specific molecular staging of prostate cancer using nested reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for prostate specific antigen and prostate specific membrane antigen

We performed repetitive molecular staging using, nested rt-PCR for PSA and PSM at the peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) of patients with prostate cancer (Pr.Ca) and benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) after transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy (TRUS-B; 6-9 biopsies/patient), Pr.Ca patients after radical prostatectomy (RP), and Pr.Ca patients with diffuse bony metastases. All BPH patients (N = 20) tested negative at BM. Of the 2 who tested positive at PB 2 weeks after TRUS-B tested negative 8 weeks after TRUS-B. Of the 17 Pr.Ca, 7 (41.2%) tested positive at PB for PSA and PSM 2 weeks after TRUS-B while only 4 (23.5%) of them tested positive at repetitive analysis 8 weeks after TRUS-B. Two (11.8%) of the 17 Pr.Ca patients had positive analysis at BM for PSA and PSM 2 and 8 weeks after TRUS-B. Of 12 Pr.Ca patients with negative pre-operative molecular staging, 7 (58.3%) tested positive at PB for PSA and PSM 2 months post-RP but only 3 (25%) of them re-tested positive 12 months post-RP. Of these 12 Pr.Ca, 4 (33.3%) tested positive at BM for PSA and PSM 2 months post-RP while none re-tested positive 12 months post-RP. All Pr.Ca (N = 20) with diffuse bony lesions tested positive at BM. At PB, 6 of them (30%) tested negative for both PSA and PSM. Our data suggest that nested rt-PCR for PSA and PSM at PB is affected by TRUS-B and RP, while such analysis at BM concerted diffuse bony disease.

Prostate tumor progression and prognosis. interplay of tumor and host factors

The prognosis for prostate cancer is largely dependent on the probability of metastatic dissemination. Prognostic markers currently in use are very poor predictors of metastatic potential, and as of yet none of the battery of new molecular markers has proven greatly superior. This may be due in part to their inability to assess the degree of interaction of subpopulations of prostate cancer cells with each other and with their microenvironment. A growing body of evidence indicates that these types of interactions are a major factor in the eventual genesis of cancer cells capable of metastasis. Recent research has demonstrated that specialized components of prostate tumors may play a critical supporting role for the overall growth of the larger tumor. The multifocal nature and apparent polyclonal origins of prostate tumors suggest that carcinogenesis and tumor progression are promoted by global influences or "field effects." It appears that these effects extend beyond the proliferating epithelial component to the tissue stroma. Prostate cancer cells and stromal cells seem to act in concert to modify the microenvironment, leading to metastasis. An understanding of this synergy may provide a new class of prognostic markers which more accurately measure the complex set of interactions that determine tumor behavior.

Detection of extraprostatic prostate cells utilizing reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction

This article reviews the utility of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in prostate cancer. RT-PCR aims to detect occult micrometastases in non-prostatic sites. Due to its exquisite analytical sensitivity, RT-PCR is able to amplify and detect even low-level, prostate-specific messages present at these extraprostatic sites. In recent years, a fair amount of data on the clinical utility of the technique had been reported. The target tissues under investigation are peripheral blood, bone marrow aspirate, and lymph nodes. Favorite markers of choice are prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), and human glandular kallikrein-2 (hK2). False positives among negative controls are low. For the most part, RT-PCR is inadequate in detecting tumor cells in the peripheral blood from patients who are known to have metastatic prostate cancer. All studies showed that RT-PCR could detect PSA, PSMA or hK2 mRNAs in the circulation of patients who have organ-confined or extraprostatic disease. Most studies showed that RT-PCR utilizing current markers could not be used as a prospective test to diagnose prostate cancer. However, a few studies also showed that the detection rate could be predictive and sensitive enough to differentiate patients with organ-confined disease from those with extraprostatic disease. Data from PSA- or PSMA-RT-PCR using lymph nodes as the tissue source is more encouraging. RT-PCR was able to detect PSA and/or PSMA positive samples that have not been detected by conventional pathology.

The detection of prostate cells by the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in the circulation of patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether prostate cells are disseminated into the circulation of patients after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), as assessed by a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay for prostate specific antigen (PSA) mRNA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-one patients, comprising 34 with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and 17 with prostate cancer who were undergoing routine TURP, had blood samples taken before and 30 min after surgery. The blood mononuclear cell layer was isolated by density-gradient centrifugation and total RNA extracted. Complementary DNA was synthesized by RT of the RNA. The target PSA sequence was amplified by PCR with specific PSA primers and the product detected on agarose-gel electrophoresis with ethidium bromide staining.

RESULTS

Five patients (all with prostate cancer) were positive on PSA RT-PCR before surgery and remained positive after TURP. Of the remaining 46 patients, five (11%; three with BPH and two with cancer) changed from a negative to a positive result after TURP.

CONCLUSION

In a proportion of patients TURP causes the dissemination of prostate cells into the circulation which are then detectable by RT-PCR of PSA mRNA.

Prostate-specific antigen and new related markers for prostate cancer

Although prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or human kallikrein 3, is the most valuable tool available for the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer, as currently used it is insufficiently sensitive and specific for early detection or staging of the malignancy. Many new concepts have been introduced in order to optimize the clinical use of PSA measurements, but each one has its own drawbacks. The molecular forms of PSA, especially the free PSA, seem to be useful for the detection of prostate cancer in men with PSA concentrations falling in the 4-10 microg/l range. New molecular techniques, such as reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for the detection of minimal amounts of PSA messenger RNA and prostate-specific membrane antigen, offer new promise for the prognosis and possibly staging of prostate cancer. On the other hand, human kallikrein 2, a serine protease closely related to PSA that is also expressed predominantly in the prostate, may be a new adjuvant marker for prostate cancer. As for its biological functions, PSA can no longer be regarded as a specific prostate molecule associated mainly with semen liquefaction when it has a possible role as a prognostic indicator in female breast cancer. The biological role of PSA in normal tissues and tumors may be much more complex than previously thought and requires further investigation.

Quantification of prostate-specific antigen mRNA by coamplification with a recombinant RNA internal standard and microtiterwell-based hybridization

We report a quantitative analytical methodology for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) mRNA, which is based on the coamplification of the target with a recombinant RNA internal standard (IS) using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. PSA mRNA and the RNA IS contain the same primer recognition sites and generate amplification products that have identical sizes but differ in a 24-bp sequence located in the center of the molecule. Amplified sequences are labeled with biotin using a biotinylated upstream primer. The products are captured on streptavidin-coated microtiter wells and hybridized to specific probes labeled with the hapten digoxigenin. The hybrids are determined using alkaline phosphatase-labeled anti-digoxigenin antibody and time-resolved fluorometry. The ratio of the fluorescence values obtained for the PSA mRNA and the RNA IS is a linear function of the amount of PSA mRNA present in the sample. Samples containing total RNA from PSA-expressing cells (LNCaP cells) in addition to 1 μg of RNA from healthy cells give fluorescence ratios related linearly to the number of cells in the range of 4 to 3000 cells.

Utilization of polymerase chain reaction technology in the detection of solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Most cancer detection tests currently performed are based on either antibody assays to a marker protein with altered expression in cancer patients or on imaging studies to identify characteristic lesions. Generally, for a positive result, these detection assays require that a tumor have a significant volume of cancer cells. Advances in diagnostic techniques and technology may allow for cancer detection at earlier stages, when the tumor burden is smaller and potentially more curable. The molecular techniques of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) are highly sensitive methods for detecting a small number of cancer cells. Over the past few years, numerous clinical studies have used PCR techniques to detect physical alterations of genes, such as mutations, deletions, translocations and amplification, the presence of oncogenic viruses, and the expression of genes specific to tissue, cancer, and metastasis. The current status of PCR as a method for detecting marker genes in the management of solid tumors is reviewed.

METHODS

A review of the literature on the clinical utility of PCR and RT-PCR in the detection of solid tumor micrometastasis was conducted.

RESULTS

Amplification by PCR is a highly sensitive method to determine gene expression. A single cell expressing a tumor marker among 10-100 million lymphocytes can be detected by the PCR assay. This approach has been used to detect tumor cells in approximately 18 different solid tumor types, with melanoma and carcinoma of the breast and prostate the most widely investigated to date. PCR-based assays have been used to detect cancer cells in biopsies of solid tissue, lymph nodes, bone marrow, peripheral blood, and other body fluids. Several studies have reported a high specificity and sensitivity of tumor marker detection and a high correlation between PCR results and the presence of metastatic disease. However, in a few studies, PCR assays have not consistently demonstrated a higher sensitivity and specificity of detection than traditional modalities for many types of cancer. There has been a wide range in sensitivity and specificity among the studies, which may be partly attributed to the lack of uniformity among the PCR protocols used in different studies.

CONCLUSIONS

PCR can detect tumor marker-expressing cells that are otherwise undetectable by other means in patients with localized or metastatic cancer. Reports from various study groups have lacked uniformity in their protocols, and this has prevented adequate comparison. The clinical utility of this assay as a tool for the prognosis and management of cancer patients remains and area of active investigation. PCR is a powerful tool in the study of the biology of cancer metastasis and will likely serve as a useful adjunct to clinical decision-making in the future.

Utilization of polymerase chain reaction technology in the detection of solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Most cancer detection tests currently performed are based on either antibody assays to a marker protein with altered expression in cancer patients or on imaging studies to identify characteristic lesions. Generally, for a positive result, these detection assays require that a tumor have a significant volume of cancer cells. Advances in diagnostic techniques and technology may allow for cancer detection at earlier stages, when the tumor burden is smaller and potentially more curable. The molecular techniques of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) are highly sensitive methods for detecting a small number of cancer cells. Over the past few years, numerous clinical studies have used PCR techniques to detect physical alterations of genes, such as mutations, deletions, translocations and amplification, the presence of oncogenic viruses, and the expression of genes specific to tissue, cancer, and metastasis. The current status of PCR as a method for detecting marker genes in the management of solid tumors is reviewed.

METHODS

A review of the literature on the clinical utility of PCR and RT-PCR in the detection of solid tumor micrometastasis was conducted.

RESULTS

Amplification by PCR is a highly sensitive method to determine gene expression. A single cell expressing a tumor marker among 10-100 million lymphocytes can be detected by the PCR assay. This approach has been used to detect tumor cells in approximately 18 different solid tumor types, with melanoma and carcinoma of the breast and prostate the most widely investigated to date. PCR-based assays have been used to detect cancer cells in biopsies of solid tissue, lymph nodes, bone marrow, peripheral blood, and other body fluids. Several studies have reported a high specificity and sensitivity of tumor marker detection and a high correlation between PCR results and the presence of metastatic disease. However, in a few studies, PCR assays have not consistently demonstrated a higher sensitivity and specificity of detection than traditional modalities for many types of cancer. There has been a wide range in sensitivity and specificity among the studies, which may be partly attributed to the lack of uniformity among the PCR protocols used in different studies.

CONCLUSIONS

PCR can detect tumor marker-expressing cells that are otherwise undetectable by other means in patients with localized or metastatic cancer. Reports from various study groups have lacked uniformity in their protocols, and this has prevented adequate comparison. The clinical utility of this assay as a tool for the prognosis and management of cancer patients remains and area of active investigation. PCR is a powerful tool in the study of the biology of cancer metastasis and will likely serve as a useful adjunct to clinical decision-making in the future.

Clinical usefulness of RT-PCR detection of hematogenous prostate cancer spread

Understaging is commonly associated with therapeutic failure of surgical intervention in apparently localized prostate cancers. Methods that specifically detect prostate cancer cells in the circulation may be able to identify metastatic cancers and thus aid in the selection of the most adequate therapy. The high sensitivity and specificity of the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) encouraged various groups to investigate the mRNA expression of prostate-specific markers in the peripheral blood of patients with prostate cancer. However, probably due to methodological differences, many contradictory results have been obtained with the markers studied so far: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSM). For this reason, clinical decisions should not be based yet on RT-PCR results. Future research and long-term follow-up on the patients may point out whether RT-PCR assays, following appropriate standardization, will have an additive value in prostate cancer staging and in prediction of tumor progression.