High-dose intensity cyclophosphamide, epidoxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone by shortened intervals and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a phase II study

Clinical Significance of ALK-1 Gene Abnormalities in Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma

Objectives

To detect relative frequency of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK-1) gene abnormality in diffuse large cell lymphoma (DLCL) using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and correlate its presence with clinicopathological features which may be useful for choice of therapy and predict survival in newly diagnosed cases.

Patients and methods

A prospective study was done between March 2004 and October 2009. Fifty patients newly diagnosed with DLCL were enrolled into the study. Immunophenotyping was done and detection of ALK-1 gene abnormalities were carried out by immunohistochemically (IHC) and FISH. Patients that proved to be ALK-1 positive were treated with standard cyclophosphamide –hydroxy-daunorubicin- oncovin-prednisone (CHOP) protocol.

Results

All ALK +ve patients achieved complete remission (CR) vs. 93.5% CR and 6.5% partial remission (PR) for ALK −ve patients respectively. Disease free survival (DFS) at 24 months was 81.8% in the CHOP-14 group (ALK-1⁻) vs. 100% for the CHOP-21 group (ALK-1⁺). Overall survival (OS) at 30 months was 80.4% in the CHOP-14 group vs. 100% for the CHOP-21 group.

Strategies for improving outcomes with 14-day anthracycline-based regimens in patients with aggressive lymphomas

Among the strategies developed to improve results in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, increasing the dose of CHOP (cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone) regimen (dose-intense regimen) and decreasing the duration of cycles (dose-dense regimen) or doing both had been proposed before the rituximab era. With granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support, both regimens are feasible without severe hematologic toxicities. Randomized studies have shown better results than with standard CHOP with longer survivals. However, the addition of rituximab to CHOP (R-CHOP) has also dramatically improved the results without increasing the toxicity. Whether the addition of density or intensity to R-CHOP will continue to improve the results are not known, and preliminary results might challenge this hypothesis. The future benefit for patients with adverse prognostic parameters might not come from dose-dense or dose-intense CHOP-like regimens but from the addition of another drug to R-CHOP.

Dose-dense chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is a heterogeneous disease that represents the seventh leading cause of cancer death. Second-generation and third-generation chemotherapy regimens have only produced a marginal improvement in outcome over the administration of the cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone regimen in aggressive forms of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This has led to the development of different strategies for improving disease-free and overall survival in this disease. Dose intensification achieved by condensing the intervals between each chemotherapy cycle is possible with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support, which reduces neutropenia and its complications. Clinical trials indicate that this strategy may improve the outcomes in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly elderly patients. Nurses can play a major role in the implementation of evidence-based supportive care strategies in clinical practice to ensure safe use of dose-dense chemotherapy regimens.

Epidemiology of treatment-associated mucosal injury after treatment with newer regimens for lymphoma, breast, lung, or colorectal cancer

GOALS OF WORK

Oral and gastrointestinal (GI) mucositis are frequent complications of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer, contributing to not only the morbidity of treatment but its cost as well. The risk associated with specific chemotherapeutic agents, alone and in combination, has been characterized previously. In the current study, we sought to estimate the risk associated with newer regimens for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and common solid tumors.

METHODS

We reviewed published studies reporting phase II and III clinical trials of dose-dense regimens for breast cancer and NHL, TAC (docetaxel, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy for breast cancer, and infusional 5-fluorouracil-based regimens for colorectal cancer. Platinum-, gemcitabine-, and taxane-based regimens for lung cancer, either alone or in combination with radiotherapy, were also considered. Using modified meta-analysis methods, we calculated quality-adjusted estimates of the risk for oral and GI mucositis by tumor type and regimen. Case reports are used to emphasize the relevance of the findings for patient care.

MAIN RESULTS

Our findings demonstrate that mucosal toxicity remains an important complication of cancer treatment. Moreover, innovations in drug combinations, scheduling, or mode of administration significantly modulate the risk for both oral and GI mucositis.

CONCLUSIONS

Ongoing review of the clinical trial experience will remain important as newer, targeted agents enter standard clinical practice.

Chemotherapy dose intensity in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is dose intensity an emerging paradigm for better outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Higher chemotherapy dose intensity has been studied as a way of improving the clinical outcomes in various malignancies, including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).

METHODS

We reviewed clinical trials that have studied the relation between dose and response in cancer chemotherapy, the theory behind dose-intense chemotherapy, and the clinical results with dose-escalated and dose-dense therapy in aggressive NHL.

RESULTS

Myeloablative high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation produces higher 5-year survival rates than standard salvage chemotherapy in relapsed aggressive lymphoma, but its role as initial therapy is not yet clear. Nonmyeloablative dose-escalated chemotherapy is feasible with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support, but this approach does not improve outcomes. Dose-dense (14-day) CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) with G-CSF support produces better results than 21-day CHOP in patients with previously untreated aggressive lymphoma, without additional toxicity. The addition of etoposide to dose-dense CHOP may provide further benefits in younger patients. The addition of rituximab to G-CSF-supported dose-dense CHOP is feasible. Preliminary data suggest the feasibility of dose-dense chemotherapy for NHL with the once-per-cycle G-CSF, pegfilgrastim.

CONCLUSION

Dose-dense chemotherapy with G-CSF support produced better clinical outcomes in both younger and older patients. Phase 3 trials of dose-dense CHOP plus rituximab with CSF support are warranted.

A randomized controlled trial investigating the survival benefit of dose-intensified multidrug combination chemotherapy (LSG9) for intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9002

The effect of enhancing the dose intensity (DI) of the key drugs in multidrug combination chemotherapy for malignant lymphoma is uncertain. We investigated the survival benefit of dose-intensified multidrug combination chemotherapy for intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Patients without any prior chemotherapy were randomly assigned either to dose-intensified multidrug combination chemotherapy, LSG9 (VEPA-B/FEPP-AB/M-FEPA, treated 3 times every 10 weeks for 28 weeks total), or to control-arm combination chemotherapy, mLSG4 (VEPA-B/FEPP-B/M-FEPA, treated 4 times every 14 weeks for 54 weeks total). The planned DI of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide were 1.96 and 1.47 times higher, respectively, in LSG9 than in mLSG4. Overall survival, complete response (CR) rate, and toxicities were evaluated. The 447 patients (230 for LSG9 and 217 for mLSG4) were enrolled between February 1991 and March 1995. The 5-year overall survival rates were 56.8% for LSG9 patients and 55.1% for mLSG4 patients (log-rank P = .42). The rates for CR plus uncertain CR were 70.0% for LSG9 and 64.5% for mLSG4. The toxicities of both regimens were similar and tolerable. The median actual DI of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide were 1.56 and 1.17 times higher, respectively, in LSG9 than in mLSG4. Compared with the control regimen mLSG4, the dose-intensified regimen LSG9 did not show significant survival benefit. An increase in the DI of doxorubicin in multidrug combination chemotherapy did not improve the survival of patients with intermediate- or high-grade NHL.

EORTC Cancer in the Elderly Task Force guidelines for the use of colony-stimulating factors in elderly patients with cancer

Increasing age is not, in itself, a contraindication to cancer chemotherapy. Myelosuppression, however, a common adverse consequence of the administration of many standard-dose chemotherapy regimens to both young and elderly patients with cancer, increases with age. The risk of development of febrile neutropenia may contribute to a reluctance to administer chemotherapy in the elderly patient population. We conducted a detailed literature search (1992-2002) to derive evidence-based conclusions on the value of prophylactic colony-stimulating factor (CSF) administration in elderly patients receiving chemotherapy. Sufficient evidence allows us to affirm that prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) reduces the incidence of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and infections in elderly patients receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) or urothelial tumours. Lack of available trial data does not allow similar conclusions to be drawn for other cancers studied, but it is likely that similar benefits would accrue from the use of prophylactic G-CSF. There is insufficient evidence to extend this recommendation to include the use of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). There are insufficient data available to allow the evaluation of the impact of prophylactic CSF on the incidence of toxic deaths in elderly patients with cancer and this is a crucial question for geriatric oncology practice. There is no evidence in elderly patients that the delivery of standard-dose chemotherapy on schedule improves efficacy measures. The data show that febrile neutropenic events are more likely to occur during the first and second cycles of chemotherapy, thus prophylactic measures should be considered early in the course of treatment. Furthermore, since systematic dose reduction can impact on outcome, primary prophylactic use of G-CSF for all elderly patients receiving curative myelotoxic chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (CHOP) or CHOP-like) is indicated and we suggest a risk-adapted strategy with primary prophylactic G-CSF administration in high-risk patients. Dose intensification, through dose interval reduction, facilitated by prophylactic G-CSF, improved survival in elderly patients with some specific diseases. There is a need for further well-designed studies to identify the elderly patients who will benefit most from prophylactic G-CSF. To achieve this, we strongly urge the design of and participation in further trials.

Fourteen-Day CHOP Supported with Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Patients with Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Results of a Phase II Study

The safety and efficacy of compressed-cycle (14-day) standard-dose CHOP (cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone) supported with prophylactic recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) were evaluated in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Patients with intermediate- or high-grade NHL (Working Formulation groups D-H and J; N = 120), accrued from 25 clinical practices, were given 6 cycles of standard-dose CHOP every 14 days. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 microg/kg was given daily subcutaneously in each cycle, starting on day 2 and continuing until the absolute neutrophil count was = 10000/microL. The overall response rate was 89%, with complete responses (CRs) in 52 of 120 patients (43%) and partial responses in 55 (46%). These results are consistent with previously reported outcomes from trials in this population. Of the 720 chemotherapy cycles planned for all patients, 615 (85%) were given on time at full dose. The median relative dose intensity (RDI) of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin was 99%; the RDI of vincristine was 73%. In the 53 patients = 60 years of age, 80% of the chemotherapy cycles were given on time at full dose, with median RDIs similar to those in the entire population. Response rates in the older patients were also similar, with CRs in 24 patients (45%) and partial responses in 21 (40%). Hematologic toxicity was significant but tolerable, with no treatment-related deaths. At a median follow-up of 20.6 months, 77% of patients were still alive. Standard-dose CHOP administered every 14 days with prophylactic G-CSF support was delivered as planned in most patients and produced response rates comparable with those with CHOP given every 3 weeks, without exceptional toxicity.

Randomized phase II study of biweekly CHOP and dose-escalated CHOP with prophylactic use of lenograstim (glycosylated G-CSF) in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9505

BACKGROUND

CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) is accepted as the best available standard treatment for first-line chemotherapy in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). However, the therapeutic efficacy of CHOP remains unsatisfactory, particularly in high-intermediate risk and high risk patients, and a new strategy is warranted in this patient population. The aim of the present study was to explore a suitable therapeutic-intensified regimen for the treatment of aggressive NHL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between May 1995 and July 1998, a total of 70 patients with high-intermediate risk or high risk aggressive NHL, according to the International Prognostic Index, were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either eight cycles of standard CHOP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2), vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) and prednisolone 100 mg for 5 days) every 2 weeks, or six cycles of dose-escalated CHOP (cyclophosphamide 1500 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 70 mg/m(2), vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) and prednisolone 100 mg for 5 days) every 3 weeks. Lenograstim (glycosylated rHuG-CSF), at a dose of 2 micro g/kg/day s.c., was administered daily from day 3 until day 13 with biweekly CHOP and until day 20 with the dose-escalated CHOP. The primary endpoint was complete response rate.

RESULTS

The complete response rate was 60% [21 of 35; 95% confidence interval (CI) 42% to 76%] with biweekly CHOP and 51% (18 of 35; 95% CI 34% to 69%) with dose-escalated CHOP. The major toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia and was more frequent in the dose-escalated CHOP arm (86%) than in the biweekly CHOP arm (50%). Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was also more frequent in the dose-escalated CHOP arm (20%) than the biweekly CHOP arm (3%). Non-hematological toxicities were acceptable in both arms. One treatment-related death (due to cardiac arrhythmia) was observed in a dose-escalated CHOP patient. Progression-free survival at 3 years was 43% (95% CI 27% to 59%) in the biweekly CHOP arm and 31% (95% CI 16% to 47%) in the dose-escalated CHOP arm. Although seven patients were deemed ineligible by central review of the pathological diagnosis, the results for both eligible and all enrolled patients were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar complete response rates and progression-free survival rates, but lower toxicity, indicated that biweekly CHOP was superior to dose-escalated CHOP in the treatment of aggressive NHL. Based on these results, the Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group is conducting a randomized phase III study comparing biweekly CHOP with standard CHOP in newly diagnosed patients with advanced-stage aggressive NHL.